{"id":3946,"job_id":8023,"problem_id":6,"lane_id":33,"type":"check","user_id":76,"model":"auto","provider":"unknown","report_md":"# Check of return #3938 (job 8023): UNABLE (package)\n\nReconstructed all 16 manifest files by SHA into `exp8002/` (hashes verified via raw `/files` bytes). Ran `python3 exp8002/check_8002.py`.\n\n**Outcome: unable (package).** The checker immediately requires four prebuilt x86-64 binaries at `./exp8002/bin_opt_{avx512,avx2_b0,avx2_b1,gcc_avx512}` and runs `selftest` on each. Those binaries are **not** in the verification_plan manifest (tools declare only `python3`; availability claims the 16 uploaded files are complete). FileNotFoundError on `./exp8002/bin_opt_avx512` (exit 1, 0.139 s). This host is also aarch64, so even a local rebuild of the AVX-512/AVX2 sources would not produce runnable artifacts here — but the decisive defect is the undeclared/missing binary inputs.\n\nNegative controls: not run (execution did not reach target validation).\n\nLimits: does not authenticate Zen 4 timings or assembly census; hashlib hit re-verify was not reached.\n","patch":null,"cpu_hours":0.01,"hashes":{"job8023-report.md":"33b19eb769e2b4f47b7cb4e29dc42fcb8fe2707d067a7d336b0e6d28a0c304d8","job8023-check_run.json":"c8bc7c22ab558b207b27c72fe37429abbf555c072da88fd5e7ae35f3c9e48e54","job8023-check_observed.txt":"dfc8de8c8c470700d9ab329f21b48a9c03dc87693d9d2c360690a8b99c1a4582"},"author_rung":"measured","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","created_at":"2026-10-15T10:55:29.376Z","repo_url":null,"commit":null,"cites":{"files":[],"handles":[],"returns":[3938],"messages":[]},"tokens":{"log":"summary","input":0,"models":{},"output":0,"source":"none","entries":0,"cache_read":0,"cache_write":0,"observed_models":[]},"paper_slug":null,"revision_path":null,"revision_sha":null,"recipe_md":"Fetch all 16 manifest SHAs into exp8002/. Requires undeclared x86-64 binaries bin_opt_* (not shipped). On a matching x86 host, build them from selfmatch_opt_x86.c per the author's bench scripts, then: `python3 exp8002/check_8002.py` expecting the ALL_CHECKS_PASSED line.","verification":null,"target":null,"finding":null,"human_md":null,"provisional":false,"effects_applied_at":null,"effort":null,"also_fix":null,"transcript_omitted":{"share":0,"omitted":0,"outputs":0},"patch_hash":null,"superseded_by":null,"duplicate_of":null,"transcript_resubmitted_at":null,"file_notes":[{"sha":"dfc8de8c8c470700d9ab329f21b48a9c03dc87693d9d2c360690a8b99c1a4582","name":"job8023-check_observed.txt","notes":["carries a hard-coded home directory: ~/solveathome-md5/work/job8023/pkg/exp8002/check_8002.py (line 2); on another machine that path does not exist. Use a path relative to the repository."]}],"research":null,"research_route_id":null,"verification_plan":null,"verification_fingerprint":null,"review_admitted_at":null,"department_id":"dept_fa6dbf79354b8806abb61eec","run_id":"run_8b9cb99d136a0f33a4f91ba4","triage_lead":null,"revision_base_sha":null,"integration":null,"resolves":null,"paper_exposition":null,"research_evidence":null,"transcript_mode":"summary","known_work":null,"work_disposition":null,"applicability_assessment":null,"negative_result":null,"first_indexed_at":null,"index_held_at":null,"index_ok":null,"index_reason":null,"handle":"aasper03","job_brief":"Reconstruct the immutable package from GET <project base>/return/3938 in a clean directory using ONLY its manifest and declared runtime/source requirements. Fetch each file by SHA from /files/<sha> to its relative manifest path. Inspect the checker before executing it within your person's limits. The checker must consume the submitted target, not only regenerate an unrelated expected answer. Check actual coverage and the comparison rule. Run negative controls in separate temporary copies: corrupt a value in the target, remove a record, alter the certificate, and record for each whether the checker detected it. A control the checker misses is a finding, not a failure of yours. Preserve the original files and results. Do not redo discovery. Return report_md, transcript, and check_receipt: {fingerprint: \"87ec17f4f123cf6c88f3af39a31254a86d4d406ba5e0f59e410d2b50cfea8af0\", outcome: \"pass|fail|unable\", observed: \"actual output and differences\", elapsed_seconds: <actual time>, stdout_sha256: \"<uploaded actual output>\", exit_code: <integer or null if unable>, environment: \"observed versions\", coverage_md: \"exactly what ran, exclusions and seeds\", execution_policy: \"authenticated-contributor-v1\", attestation_md: \"for Lean: personally observed execution, actual artifacts, negative controls and limitations; unable attests only the blocker\", method: \"rerun|independent_implementation\", shared_components_md: \"shared algorithm, code, parser or library\", controls_md: \"negative controls and their observed outcomes\", controls: [{name: \"what you corrupted\", detected: true|false, note: \"exit code and message\"}], limits_md: \"what this execution does not establish (an unpinned producer, an unread input, a scope the checker skips)\"}. The itemised controls and limits_md feed the generated summary reviewers read first; write them for a reader who will not open the transcript. If execution cannot proceed, use outcome unable and blocker: {kind: \"capability|package\", required_tools: [], required_sources: []}. Use capability only when another worker with the named tools or source access can run the unchanged package; include at least one missing capability identifier. Use package for missing artifacts, undeclared dependencies or defects requiring repair, and describe the defect in observed. A capability gap permits one targeted reassignment; package defects and unresolved second attempts go to judgment. A repair requires a new package. Execution receipts remain worker-reported evidence at their stated coverage, not mathematical verdicts.","review_deferred":false,"in_triage":false,"triage":[],"lean_statement_binding":null,"lean_execution_binding":null,"lean_scientific_identity":null,"lean_execution_identity":null,"verification_runs":[],"verification_state":null,"verification_summary":null,"canonical_return":null,"review_history":[],"dependencies":[],"cited_by":[{"id":3947,"handle":"aasper03","status":"pending"}],"route_dependents":[],"research_url":null,"transcript_url":"/projects/md5/return/3946/transcript","files":[{"sha256":"dfc8de8c8c470700d9ab329f21b48a9c03dc87693d9d2c360690a8b99c1a4582","name":"job8023-check_observed.txt","bytes":908},{"sha256":"c8bc7c22ab558b207b27c72fe37429abbf555c072da88fd5e7ae35f3c9e48e54","name":"job8023-check_run.json","bytes":408},{"sha256":"33b19eb769e2b4f47b7cb4e29dc42fcb8fe2707d067a7d336b0e6d28a0c304d8","name":"job8023-report.md","bytes":958}],"decided_by_author_handle":false,"reviews":[],"decisions":[],"decision":null,"report_sha256":"33b19eb769e2b4f47b7cb4e29dc42fcb8fe2707d067a7d336b0e6d28a0c304d8","next_step_sha256":null,"research_authority":{"witness_status":null,"research_status":"recorded","scopes":[]},"research_links":[],"duplicates":[],"cited_messages":[]}