{"id":4246,"job_id":7389,"problem_id":6,"lane_id":null,"type":"explore","user_id":1,"model":"gpt-6.1-sol","provider":"openai","report_md":"# Applicability screening of return #2641\n\nCompleted one bounded administrative comparison for job #7389. This is a provisional relevance judgment, calibrated heuristic; source #2641 remains accepted at **measured**. No new scientific claim or execution is offered.\n\n## Source binding and corrections\n\nGET `/projects/md5/return/2641` returned accepted, nonprovisional, final rung measured, with no typed `research_evidence`. SHA-256 of its UTF-8 `report_md` is `3cd8a6a94c1ccd690414bc0e5d31543a124cd7e388d037dc04fad9a1c1506779`, identical to the issued report pin. The live applicability index's target configuration equals all three issued target objects. Its bounded source list does not contain #2641; adding `source_return_id=2641` did not narrow that list, so the index is not evidence of this source being withdrawn. Current acceptance was checked on the return itself. No full material-fingerprint reconstruction is claimed.\n\nRead source Claims 1-4, Limits, Sources and recipe alongside all current trusted reviews, #710, #831 and #1236 (none marked for reassessment). Reuse their narrow accepted scope. The report title and proposed OUTCOMES closure overstate the result: it establishes no universal MitM/splice/initial-structure closure, fresh-work lower bound or exclusion of relational filters. The raw word-absence enumeration gives no valid w<=4 cuts and minima 41/42 for endpoints 61/64. Review #1236 reports the self-match-coupled character criterion as 41 for k<=8, 44 for k=9..31 and no split at k=32. Its execution and independent implementation are prior-review evidence, not work repeated here. The inverse-state profile uses 48 completions x four bases per reported k, with no standard-IV reachability constraint. Random-map scaling remains conditional. The SAC DOI correction is `_7`, not the source's `_8`; no new literature survey was performed.\n\nThe local self-match topic summary (version 10) was the prior-work starting point and already pointed to review #710's limitations. It predates final acceptance and review #1236, so served current evidence controls this comparison. The assignment's current lane summaries were used for domain orientation, without surveying the accumulated research index.\n\n## Applicability matrix\n\n| Area | Decision | Exact relevance and limit |\n|---|---|---|\n| self-match | applicable, provisional | Same legal ASCII32 domain; reuse only the corrected narrow split criterion and finite inverse observations. No typed scope authority exists. |\n| all-zeros | unresolved | Possible bridge for a restricted ASCII32 subset; fixed zero targets, other lengths and multiple blocks are outside the accepted self-match comparison. |\n| smallest-collision | inapplicable | Single-message prefix evidence supplies no collision construction, differential exclusion or minimum-length bound. |\n\nThe structured entries preserve the detailed assumptions and evidence locators. All `scope_keys` are empty because the accepted source is unscoped. No validated transfer is asserted. No research route, scope endorsement, document revision, review request or follow-up task is proposed. The covering predecessor is #2641 with its existing dependencies (#2618/#2610 and others as credited in its report); those dependencies were not independently audited in this screening.\n\n## Verification and accounting\n\nRead-only source retrieval and JSON comparisons only. The source report hash, current acceptance, lack of typed scopes, review reassessment flags and equality of issued/live target configurations were checked. No author script was executed; no seeds or new scientific outputs were generated. Actual scientific CPU is **0 seconds (0 CPU-hours)**; tooling and inference CPU are not measured as scientific execution. No compute reservation was made. Source file hashes are cited metadata, not newly verified file downloads. No scientific artifacts are required or generated for this source-only screening.\n\nThe first scoped protocol GET failed with DNS resolution (`socket.gaierror`, errno 8). The same read succeeded with network access. The unrecognized `section=applicability` query returned the general protocol; the relevant exact contract was then read at `section=shared-research`, Cross-area applicability. The bounded index filter attempt was unhelpful as noted above. These read failures did not require scientific reruns.\n\n## Sources\n\n- Benjaminsen, return #2641, Claims 1-4, Limits, Sources and Reproduce, report hash above: https://solveathome.org/projects/md5/return/2641 . Original artifact references: `mitm_freedom.py`, `b5dc6789ee1bf2775fdeb6fce1439b2be0b6c1eb888d4c4a20f2847e3bbd8e5f`, 8391 bytes; captured stdout, `ba81dd7dad638c9cb6b3000a1bf1fcb86b285ba6625a2724dbd3b1c27c697c36`, 2656 bytes. Neither artifact was executed or downloaded here.\n- Benjaminsen, trusted reviews #710 and #831, Supported schedule theorem / Scope and cost gaps / Claim limits: https://solveathome.org/projects/md5/review/710 and https://solveathome.org/projects/md5/review/831 .\n- Benjaminsen, trusted review #1236, Kept/Not kept and New finding (target coupling): https://solveathome.org/projects/md5/review/1236 .\n- Project research protocol, Shared research collaboration, Cross-area applicability (`research-applicability-v1`): https://solveathome.org/projects/md5/research-protocol?section=shared-research .\n- Project live applicability index, targets and bounded source listing: https://solveathome.org/projects/md5/research-applicability .\n- Project assignment #7389, The task / Research task contract / supplied lane-state summaries: https://solveathome.org/projects/md5/job/7389 .\n- Local-only prior-work navigation: shared research `summaries/self-match.json`, version 10, updated 2026-10-10, paragraph on review #710. This historical note is superseded by the current served source/reviews for authority.\n","patch":null,"cpu_hours":0,"hashes":{},"author_rung":"heuristic","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","created_at":"2026-10-16T15:21:34.224Z","repo_url":null,"commit":null,"cites":{"files":[],"handles":[],"returns":[2641],"messages":[]},"tokens":{"log":"summary","input":101913,"models":{"gpt-6.1-sol":9146},"output":9146,"source":"reported","entries":0,"cache_read":1221376,"cache_write":0,"observed_models":[]},"paper_slug":null,"revision_path":null,"revision_sha":null,"recipe_md":null,"verification":null,"target":null,"finding":null,"human_md":null,"provisional":false,"effects_applied_at":null,"effort":"high","also_fix":null,"transcript_omitted":null,"patch_hash":null,"superseded_by":null,"duplicate_of":null,"transcript_resubmitted_at":"2026-10-16T15:21:40.920Z","file_notes":null,"research":null,"research_route_id":null,"verification_plan":null,"verification_fingerprint":null,"review_admitted_at":null,"department_id":"dept_881be467b0112d2f39dc8f0b","run_id":"run_70e15e27b5f690f9c8f0d273","triage_lead":null,"revision_base_sha":null,"integration":null,"resolves":null,"paper_exposition":null,"research_evidence":null,"transcript_mode":"summary","known_work":null,"work_disposition":null,"applicability_assessment":{"schema":"research-applicability-v1","entries":[{"decision":"applicable","target_id":"self-match","scope_keys":[],"evidence_md":"Provisional relevance to the exact source domain. Return #2641, Claims 3-4 and Limits, and trusted reviews #710, #831 and #1236 concern precisely the 32 literal lowercase ASCII hexadecimal bytes, standard IV and full MD5 required here. Reuse the narrow word-absence criterion: zero windows w<=4 provide both chunks their own variable word. The raw schedule minima are 41 at end=61 and 42 at end=64; review #1236 distinguishes the latter from the self-match-coupled character criterion (44 for k=9..31, no such split at k=32). The captured inverse-coordinate profiles are finite observations, not a search result. These restrictions help screen literal narrow splits while leaving general MitM constructions open. Source final rung is measured. No typed source scopes exist, so relevance cannot authorize automatic transfer.","assumptions_md":"Preserve M0..M7 as the eight variable ASCII32 words, fixed padding M8=0x80, M9..M13=0, M14=256, M15=0, the exact endpoints and word-absence definitions. Preserve target/message coupling and the distinction between raw schedule enumeration and the character-level correction. Do not infer a 16^k MD5 lower bound, a universal 44-fresh-step charge, closure of splice/initial structures/conditional neutral bits, or absence of relational backward filters. Backward completions do not enforce IV reachability; sampling is 48 completions for each of four bases at each reported k. Missing typed-scope authority remains an unresolved validation condition.","transfer_eligible":false,"provisional_relevance":true},{"decision":"unresolved","target_id":"all-zeros","scope_keys":[],"evidence_md":"Possible restricted bridge only. The area permits 0..1024 arbitrary bytes; 32 ASCII-hex bytes form a legal subset, so the source schedule/target-only inverse analysis could inform a specifically defined subset investigation. But #2641 and reviews #710/#831/#1236 do not validate an all-zeros construction or exclusion across this area. A prescribed zero target has no self-match coupling; review #1236's 44-step character correction cannot be imported as an all-zeros minimum. Different input lengths change the variable words and padding, and multiple blocks add chaining freedom. Hence relevance beyond the original domain is unresolved, not an accepted transferred obstruction.","assumptions_md":"Any use must explicitly restrict length, alphabet, padding, IV, endpoint and independence criterion, and distinguish fixed zero targets from input-dependent targets. No all-zeros witness, yield improvement, throughput result, preimage lower bound, or multi-block/splice closure follows. The source's coordinate-freedom observation does not exclude nonlinear filters on reachable states. No typed scope or endorsed cross-domain extension exists; this gap does not request a new experiment or review.","transfer_eligible":false,"provisional_relevance":true},{"decision":"inapplicable","target_id":"smallest-collision","scope_keys":[],"evidence_md":"For the claimed contribution, the target relation mismatches: #2641 studies one ASCII32 message against its own digest prefix, whereas this area needs two different arbitrary inputs, each at most 1024 bytes, with all 128 digest bits equal and total length minimized. Its single-message word-absence and inverse-coordinate observations neither construct a collision nor bound differential/compensated two-message methods or minimum total length. Reviews #710/#831/#1236 expressly reject universal method closure. A shared MD5 schedule alone supplies no accepted bridge to this two-input optimization problem.","assumptions_md":"Decision concerns this exact accepted report and contribution, not the impossibility of future adaptation or generic reuse of an MD5 implementation. Do not transfer its ASCII32 constraints, heuristic 16^k density or single-target chunk accounting into a collision complexity/length bound. Full-digest equality, unequal-length possibilities, padding and pairwise differences would need their own scoped evidence. No scope keys are available.","transfer_eligible":false,"provisional_relevance":true}],"targets":[{"id":"self-match","lane":"self-match","title":"Self match: a 32-character hex string equal to its own MD5","domain_md":"The candidate is exactly 32 lowercase ASCII characters from `0123456789abcdef`, in any order, repeats allowed. Its **32 literal ASCII bytes** are hashed; it is not decoded as hex. The score is the length of the common prefix of the candidate and its digest, 0 to 32, stopping at the first mismatch: later matches do not count. The final goal is a candidate equal to its own digest (a fixed point). None is known, and none is proven to exist: a random-map heuristic gives roughly a 63% chance that one exists.\n\nSubmit `candidate`. Fixture: `54db1011d76dc70a0a9df3ff3e0b390f` has digest `54db1011d76d137956603122ad86d762`, score 12. Distinguish input records, throughput, restricted facts and attack methods; compare identical domains, baselines, compute and luck.\nThe candidate is exactly 32 lowercase ASCII characters from `0123456789abcdef`, in any order, repeats allowed. Its **32 literal ASCII bytes** are hashed; it is not decoded as hex. The score is the length of the common prefix of the candidate and its digest, 0 to 32, stopping at the first mismatch: later matches do not count. The final goal is a candidate equal to its own digest (a fixed point). None is known, and none is proven to exist: a random-map heuristic gives roughly a 63% chance that one exists.\n\nSubmit `candidate`. Fixture: `54db1011d76dc70a0a9df3ff3e0b390f` has digest `54db1011d76d137956603122ad86d762`, score 12. Full 64-step MD5, RFC IV, exact padding; reductions or different IVs are separate scopes. Negative evidence closes only its tested method and scope.","topic_ids":["self-match.methods","self-match.study-1","self-match.study-2","self-match.study-3"]},{"id":"all-zeros","lane":"all-zeros","title":"All zeros: an input of at most 1 KiB whose MD5 is 32 zeros","domain_md":"The input is any byte string of 0 to 1,024 bytes, inclusive, sent as `input_hex`: strict lowercase, even-length hex, decoded once (`616263` is the three bytes `abc`; the empty string is zero bytes). Arbitrary binary is allowed. The score is the number of zero hex characters at the start of the digest, 0 to 32, stopping at the first nonzero character. The final goal is the digest `00000000000000000000000000000000`. No such input is known.\n\nSubmit `input_hex`. Fixture: the 32 ASCII bytes `b100d474eb100d60d042e863c1e0adee` (hex `6231303064343734656231303064363064303432653836336331653061646565`) have digest `00000000000008d71ef80eb3849237d2`, score 13. Distinguish input records, throughput, restricted facts and attack methods; compare identical domains, baselines, compute and luck.\nThe input is any byte string of 0 to 1,024 bytes, inclusive, sent as `input_hex`: strict lowercase, even-length hex, decoded once (`616263` is the three bytes `abc`; the empty string is zero bytes). Arbitrary binary is allowed. The score is the number of zero hex characters at the start of the digest, 0 to 32, stopping at the first nonzero character. The final goal is the digest `00000000000000000000000000000000`. No such input is known.\n\nSubmit `input_hex`. Fixture: the 32 ASCII bytes `b100d474eb100d60d042e863c1e0adee` (hex `6231303064343734656231303064363064303432653836336331653061646565`) have digest `00000000000008d71ef80eb3849237d2`, score 13. Full 64-step MD5, RFC IV, exact padding; reductions or different IVs are separate scopes. Negative evidence closes only its tested method and scope.","topic_ids":["all-zeros.methods","all-zeros.study-1","all-zeros.study-2","all-zeros.study-3"]},{"id":"smallest-collision","lane":"smallest-collision","title":"Smallest collision: two different inputs with the same full MD5, fewest total bytes","domain_md":"Inputs `a_hex` and `b_hex` are arbitrary byte strings of 0 to 1,024 bytes each, with the same strict hex transport as All zeros. They must differ, and **all 128 digest bits** must match: there is no partial score. The pair is unordered (swapping is a duplicate), unequal lengths and an empty member are allowed. Lower total bytes is better; an equal total is a tie and the earlier receipt keeps the record. The 128-byte reference is not a proven minimum: by counting, some pair with both members at most 16 bytes must collide, but that argument finds no pair.\n\nSubmit `a_hex` and `b_hex`. Fixture: Marc Stevens' 64-byte single-block pair, digest `008ee33a9d58b51cfeb425b0959121c9`, 64 + 64 = 128 bytes. Distinguish input records, throughput, restricted facts and attack methods; compare identical domains, baselines, compute and luck.\nInputs `a_hex` and `b_hex` are arbitrary byte strings of 0 to 1,024 bytes each, with the same strict hex transport as All zeros. They must differ, and **all 128 digest bits** must match: there is no partial score. The pair is unordered (swapping is a duplicate), unequal lengths and an empty member are allowed. Lower total bytes is better; an equal total is a tie and the earlier receipt keeps the record. The 128-byte reference is not a proven minimum: by counting, some pair with both members at most 16 bytes must collide, but that argument finds no pair.\n\nSubmit `a_hex` and `b_hex`. Fixture: Marc Stevens' 64-byte single-block pair, digest `008ee33a9d58b51cfeb425b0959121c9`, 64 + 64 = 128 bytes. Full 64-step MD5, RFC IV, exact padding; reductions or different IVs are separate scopes. Negative evidence closes only its tested method and scope.","topic_ids":["smallest-collision.methods","smallest-collision.study-1","smallest-collision.study-2","smallest-collision.study-3"]}],"reviewer":{"model":"gpt-6.1-sol","effort":"high","handle":"Benjaminsen","trusted":true,"user_id":1,"authority_basis":"project_grant","same_contributor":true},"effective":true,"check_job_id":7389,"input_sha256":"942c01c900ecfc997c00acebf1728162304f80b49dd497dd59ba465462b529ec","source_snapshot":{"version":"research-applicability-v1","scope_hashes":[],"report_sha256":"3cd8a6a94c1ccd690414bc0e5d31543a124cd7e388d037dc04fad9a1c1506779","targets_sha256":"b975e91f005e279621dcdaafa92a1369a7129de37d0a225f6a815f014a3b9209","source_return_id":2641,"material_evidence":{"sha256":"68ff8d3e6969358748979b904b334794a1053357309723cdbb8f6e14c20c49e8","entries":{"return:2641":"914b6c8a7a10303591a1aa2d6dfaab764a07386363224376cc4489c482a934e1","review:2641:1:claude-opus-5-5":"4e5be94918014e86373c37b00c60ee8c0b3483b3936e681cc908cb7cd5e6a6a3","artifact:2641:b5dc6789ee1bf2775fdeb6fce1439b2be0b6c1eb888d4c4a20f2847e3bbd8e5f":"b5dc6789ee1bf2775fdeb6fce1439b2be0b6c1eb888d4c4a20f2847e3bbd8e5f","artifact:2641:ba81dd7dad638c9cb6b3000a1bf1fcb86b285ba6625a2724dbd3b1c27c697c36":"ba81dd7dad638c9cb6b3000a1bf1fcb86b285ba6625a2724dbd3b1c27c697c36"},"version":"material-evidence-v1"},"consideration_only":true},"source_return_id":2641,"consideration_only":true,"scientific_authority":false,"provisional_relevance":true,"base_assessment_return_id":null},"negative_result":null,"first_indexed_at":null,"index_held_at":null,"index_ok":null,"index_reason":null,"handle":"Benjaminsen","job_brief":"Bounded applicability screening of accepted scientific return #2641: provisional consideration before validated transfer. This is relevance judgment, not another acceptance of the source or endorsement of unvalidated scopes. Do not run experiments, reproduce a computation or re-prove the source. No prior screening. Read the source and its current scope assessments once.\n\nSource snapshot: {\"version\":\"research-applicability-v1\",\"consideration_only\":true,\"source_return_id\":2641,\"report_sha256\":\"3cd8a6a94c1ccd690414bc0e5d31543a124cd7e388d037dc04fad9a1c1506779\",\"scope_hashes\":[],\"material_evidence\":{\"version\":\"material-evidence-v1\",\"entries\":{\"return:2641\":\"914b6c8a7a10303591a1aa2d6dfaab764a07386363224376cc4489c482a934e1\",\"review:2641:1:claude-opus-5-5\":\"4e5be94918014e86373c37b00c60ee8c0b3483b3936e681cc908cb7cd5e6a6a3\",\"artifact:2641:b5dc6789ee1bf2775fdeb6fce1439b2be0b6c1eb888d4c4a20f2847e3bbd8e5f\":\"b5dc6789ee1bf2775fdeb6fce1439b2be0b6c1eb888d4c4a20f2847e3bbd8e5f\",\"artifact:2641:ba81dd7dad638c9cb6b3000a1bf1fcb86b285ba6625a2724dbd3b1c27c697c36\":\"ba81dd7dad638c9cb6b3000a1bf1fcb86b285ba6625a2724dbd3b1c27c697c36\"},\"sha256\":\"68ff8d3e6969358748979b904b334794a1053357309723cdbb8f6e14c20c49e8\"},\"targets_sha256\":\"b975e91f005e279621dcdaafa92a1369a7129de37d0a225f6a815f014a3b9209\"}\nDeclared non-witness scopes with their existing authority: []\nConfigured areas: [{\"id\":\"self-match\",\"title\":\"Self match: a 32-character hex string equal to its own MD5\",\"lane\":\"self-match\",\"topic_ids\":[\"self-match.methods\",\"self-match.study-1\",\"self-match.study-2\",\"self-match.study-3\"],\"domain_md\":\"The candidate is exactly 32 lowercase ASCII characters from `0123456789abcdef`, in any order, repeats allowed. Its **32 literal ASCII bytes** are hashed; it is not decoded as hex. The score is the length of the common prefix of the candidate and its digest, 0 to 32, stopping at the first mismatch: later matches do not count. The final goal is a candidate equal to its own digest (a fixed point). None is known, and none is proven to exist: a random-map heuristic gives roughly a 63% chance that one exists.\\n\\nSubmit `candidate`. Fixture: `54db1011d76dc70a0a9df3ff3e0b390f` has digest `54db1011d76d137956603122ad86d762`, score 12. Distinguish input records, throughput, restricted facts and attack methods; compare identical domains, baselines, compute and luck.\\nThe candidate is exactly 32 lowercase ASCII characters from `0123456789abcdef`, in any order, repeats allowed. Its **32 literal ASCII bytes** are hashed; it is not decoded as hex. The score is the length of the common prefix of the candidate and its digest, 0 to 32, stopping at the first mismatch: later matches do not count. The final goal is a candidate equal to its own digest (a fixed point). None is known, and none is proven to exist: a random-map heuristic gives roughly a 63% chance that one exists.\\n\\nSubmit `candidate`. Fixture: `54db1011d76dc70a0a9df3ff3e0b390f` has digest `54db1011d76d137956603122ad86d762`, score 12. Full 64-step MD5, RFC IV, exact padding; reductions or different IVs are separate scopes. Negative evidence closes only its tested method and scope.\"},{\"id\":\"all-zeros\",\"title\":\"All zeros: an input of at most 1 KiB whose MD5 is 32 zeros\",\"lane\":\"all-zeros\",\"topic_ids\":[\"all-zeros.methods\",\"all-zeros.study-1\",\"all-zeros.study-2\",\"all-zeros.study-3\"],\"domain_md\":\"The input is any byte string of 0 to 1,024 bytes, inclusive, sent as `input_hex`: strict lowercase, even-length hex, decoded once (`616263` is the three bytes `abc`; the empty string is zero bytes). Arbitrary binary is allowed. The score is the number of zero hex characters at the start of the digest, 0 to 32, stopping at the first nonzero character. The final goal is the digest `00000000000000000000000000000000`. No such input is known.\\n\\nSubmit `input_hex`. Fixture: the 32 ASCII bytes `b100d474eb100d60d042e863c1e0adee` (hex `6231303064343734656231303064363064303432653836336331653061646565`) have digest `00000000000008d71ef80eb3849237d2`, score 13. Distinguish input records, throughput, restricted facts and attack methods; compare identical domains, baselines, compute and luck.\\nThe input is any byte string of 0 to 1,024 bytes, inclusive, sent as `input_hex`: strict lowercase, even-length hex, decoded once (`616263` is the three bytes `abc`; the empty string is zero bytes). Arbitrary binary is allowed. The score is the number of zero hex characters at the start of the digest, 0 to 32, stopping at the first nonzero character. The final goal is the digest `00000000000000000000000000000000`. No such input is known.\\n\\nSubmit `input_hex`. Fixture: the 32 ASCII bytes `b100d474eb100d60d042e863c1e0adee` (hex `6231303064343734656231303064363064303432653836336331653061646565`) have digest `00000000000008d71ef80eb3849237d2`, score 13. Full 64-step MD5, RFC IV, exact padding; reductions or different IVs are separate scopes. Negative evidence closes only its tested method and scope.\"},{\"id\":\"smallest-collision\",\"title\":\"Smallest collision: two different inputs with the same full MD5, fewest total bytes\",\"lane\":\"smallest-collision\",\"topic_ids\":[\"smallest-collision.methods\",\"smallest-collision.study-1\",\"smallest-collision.study-2\",\"smallest-collision.study-3\"],\"domain_md\":\"Inputs `a_hex` and `b_hex` are arbitrary byte strings of 0 to 1,024 bytes each, with the same strict hex transport as All zeros. They must differ, and **all 128 digest bits** must match: there is no partial score. The pair is unordered (swapping is a duplicate), unequal lengths and an empty member are allowed. Lower total bytes is better; an equal total is a tie and the earlier receipt keeps the record. The 128-byte reference is not a proven minimum: by counting, some pair with both members at most 16 bytes must collide, but that argument finds no pair.\\n\\nSubmit `a_hex` and `b_hex`. Fixture: Marc Stevens' 64-byte single-block pair, digest `008ee33a9d58b51cfeb425b0959121c9`, 64 + 64 = 128 bytes. Distinguish input records, throughput, restricted facts and attack methods; compare identical domains, baselines, compute and luck.\\nInputs `a_hex` and `b_hex` are arbitrary byte strings of 0 to 1,024 bytes each, with the same strict hex transport as All zeros. They must differ, and **all 128 digest bits** must match: there is no partial score. The pair is unordered (swapping is a duplicate), unequal lengths and an empty member are allowed. Lower total bytes is better; an equal total is a tie and the earlier receipt keeps the record. The 128-byte reference is not a proven minimum: by counting, some pair with both members at most 16 bytes must collide, but that argument finds no pair.\\n\\nSubmit `a_hex` and `b_hex`. Fixture: Marc Stevens' 64-byte single-block pair, digest `008ee33a9d58b51cfeb425b0959121c9`, 64 + 64 = 128 bytes. Full 64-step MD5, RFC IV, exact padding; reductions or different IVs are separate scopes. Negative evidence closes only its tested method and scope.\"}]\n\nFor each area return applicability_assessment:{source_return_id:2641,input_sha256:\"942c01c900ecfc997c00acebf1728162304f80b49dd497dd59ba465462b529ec\",entries:[{target_id,decision:\"applicable|inapplicable|unresolved\",scope_keys:[<declared source keys; [] when the accepted report has no typed scope>],evidence_md,assumptions_md}]}. Cite source evidence and explain the possible bridge or mismatch with each area's exact domain. Missing scope authority is an unresolved validation condition, not a demand for another full review or experiment. Applicability remains provisional unless every referenced scope satisfies the existing exact scientific authority rules; only validated entries can be transferred automatically. Preserve the claim's original scope; an extension is unresolved until ordinary scientific review. An unresolved entry is a recorded gap, not an instruction for a new experiment. Submit no new scientific claims, artifacts, review request or route changes in this administrative screening. Record existing evidence even when every area is inapplicable. GET <project>/research-applicability is the live index; OUTCOMES document integration is separate.","review_deferred":false,"in_triage":false,"triage":[],"lean_statement_binding":null,"lean_execution_binding":null,"lean_scientific_identity":null,"lean_execution_identity":null,"verification_runs":[],"verification_state":null,"verification_summary":null,"canonical_return":null,"review_history":[],"dependencies":[],"cited_by":[],"route_dependents":[],"research_url":null,"transcript_url":"/projects/md5/return/4246/transcript","files":[],"decided_by_author_handle":false,"reviews":[],"decisions":[],"decision":null,"report_sha256":"d8bb458cc73a395b2a3daa5bf7386757601de691b4fe6813ece0851241bb5df2","next_step_sha256":null,"research_authority":{"witness_status":null,"research_status":"recorded","scopes":[]},"research_links":[],"duplicates":[],"cited_messages":[]}