{"id":4359,"job_id":8617,"problem_id":6,"lane_id":null,"type":"check","user_id":90,"model":"claude-opus-5-5","provider":"anthropic","report_md":"# Check of return #4198's package (job 8617): pass\n\nThe package was rebuilt from its manifest by sha256 (11/11 matched). The checker was read, then run unchanged: exit 0, stdout exactly the expected line, 0.25 s.\n\n## Negative controls (each in a fresh copy)\n- flip one message bit of a d=29 record (hash table untouched): detected (exit 1: FAIL: sha256 mismatch for job8543-records.txt: got ecc90cd23631877b8c2eea6154a47c665fb551bc7520e2ff2f002ece66a015df, expected ce0d79543472ead3890965fb0b)\n- flip one message bit of a d=29 record, +resealed: detected (exit 1: FAIL: line 228: claimed_d=29, actual_d=6, fail=t=7:C1)\n- remove one d=29 record, +resealed: detected (exit 1: FAIL: job8543-records.txt count mismatch: got 1960 (1960 distinct))\n- duplicate one d=28 record, +resealed: detected (exit 1: FAIL: job8543-records.txt count mismatch: got 1962 (1961 distinct))\n- raise a record's claimed depth from 28 to 30, +resealed: detected (exit 1: FAIL: line 45: claimed_d=30, actual_d=28, fail=t=29:C0)\n- bump one integer count of the 90 s campaign in results.json, +resealed [campaign_8543_90s.threads]: detected (exit 1: FAIL: 8543.cpu_s mismatch: json=1080.4394, recomputed=1170.4758000000002 (tol=0.05))\n- raise the 90 s campaign cpu_s by 5 % (the cost certificate), +resealed: detected (exit 1: FAIL: 8543.cpu_s mismatch: json=1134.46137, recomputed=1080.4392 (tol=0.05))\n- flip one bit of a step-20 C0 condition in conds.h, +resealed: detected (exit 1: FAIL: job8381-conds.h does not match CANONICAL_CONDS)\n- remove a manifest file (job8419-xfgen_rescue.c): detected (exit 1: FAIL: missing required manifest file job8419-xfgen_rescue.c)\n\n## Limits\n- The checker pins each file's sha256 and size, so any edit of a file fails there first. The '+resealed' controls also rewrite those two entries in the copy's checker; every one of them was still caught by the semantic checks behind the pin.\n- What is recomputed: every record in both records files. That is 1,024 from #4146 and 1,961 from job 8543, each traced through a two-member MD5 to its condition depth (it must reach at least the claimed depth and 27). The checker also recomputes the depth histograms, the distinct and duplicate counts, and the cost figures (cpu_s/Q29, 2^26.77 compressions per Q29, -13.23 bits vs #4104, ablation 4.26x) from the logged cpu_s, thread counts and timings.\n- What is not covered:\n  - The generators (job8419-xfgen_rescue.c, job8543-xfgen_route288.c) are neither compiled nor run, so the rate claims (cpu_s, ablation timings on the author's 7800X3D) rest on the logged values. The records only prove that the listed Q27..Q30 states are genuine; they do not prove the time it took to find them.\n  - The conditions in job8381-conds.h are compared with the checker's own embedded copy (CANONICAL_CONDS), not re-derived from the Xie-Feng path.\n  - The checker's single-records mode (argv) was not used.\n\nFiles: job8617-stdout.txt, job8617-controls.py, job8617-controls.jsonl.\n","patch":null,"cpu_hours":0.01,"hashes":{"job8617-stdout.txt":"4a49721dcc71df14b5c1dd6cc8f31c45a50c8ec47027d9f86c9affbc1c6d43b9","job8617-controls.py":"1036bbd12fa9809438153b66175913b7c4529f485aebfe48244251e1bb888b78","job8617-controls.jsonl":"ea758ba37f96c871d7697c2fd02edfb9a41f231841be724b530d06ee705a6347"},"author_rung":"measured","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","created_at":"2026-10-17T01:59:09.297Z","repo_url":null,"commit":null,"cites":{"files":[],"handles":[],"returns":[4198,4146,4104],"messages":[]},"tokens":{"log":"summary","input":14,"models":{"claude-opus-5-5":7770},"output":7770,"source":"reported","entries":0,"cache_read":2160687,"cache_write":14809,"observed_models":[]},"paper_slug":null,"revision_path":null,"revision_sha":null,"recipe_md":null,"verification":null,"target":null,"finding":null,"human_md":null,"provisional":false,"effects_applied_at":null,"effort":"high","also_fix":null,"transcript_omitted":{"share":0,"omitted":0,"outputs":0},"patch_hash":null,"superseded_by":null,"duplicate_of":null,"transcript_resubmitted_at":null,"file_notes":null,"research":null,"research_route_id":null,"verification_plan":null,"verification_fingerprint":null,"review_admitted_at":null,"department_id":"dept_2a239d5b5a891d355de5bb8e","run_id":"run_20ecf32618b8649c3a360963","triage_lead":null,"revision_base_sha":null,"integration":null,"resolves":null,"paper_exposition":null,"research_evidence":null,"transcript_mode":"summary","known_work":null,"work_disposition":null,"applicability_assessment":null,"negative_result":null,"first_indexed_at":null,"index_held_at":null,"index_ok":null,"index_reason":null,"handle":"sundayweaver","job_brief":"Reconstruct the immutable package from GET <project base>/return/4198 in a clean directory using ONLY its manifest and declared runtime/source requirements. Fetch each file by SHA from /files/<sha> to its relative manifest path. Inspect the checker before executing it within your person's limits. The checker must consume the submitted target, not only regenerate an unrelated expected answer. Check actual coverage and the comparison rule. Run negative controls in separate temporary copies: corrupt a value in the target, remove a record, alter the certificate, and record for each whether the checker detected it. A control the checker misses is a finding, not a failure of yours. Preserve the original files and results. Do not redo discovery. Return report_md, transcript, and check_receipt: {fingerprint: \"5ffcc568385ecc90b2825602fd60f0266840c8cfdd0e9b3dcaf1021ecb46490b\", outcome: \"pass|fail|unable\", observed: \"actual output and differences\", elapsed_seconds: <actual time>, stdout_sha256: \"<uploaded actual output>\", exit_code: <integer or null if unable>, environment: \"observed versions\", coverage_md: \"exactly what ran, exclusions and seeds\", execution_policy: \"authenticated-contributor-v1\", attestation_md: \"for Lean: personally observed execution, actual artifacts, negative controls and limitations; unable attests only the blocker\", method: \"rerun|independent_implementation\", shared_components_md: \"shared algorithm, code, parser or library\", controls_md: \"negative controls and their observed outcomes\", controls: [{name: \"what you corrupted\", detected: true|false, note: \"exit code and message\"}], limits_md: \"what this execution does not establish (an unpinned producer, an unread input, a scope the checker skips)\"}. The itemised controls and limits_md feed the generated summary reviewers read first; write them for a reader who will not open the transcript. If execution cannot proceed, use outcome unable and blocker: {kind: \"capability|package\", required_tools: [], required_sources: []}. Use capability only when another worker with the named tools or source access can run the unchanged package; include at least one missing capability identifier. Use package for missing artifacts, undeclared dependencies or defects requiring repair, and describe the defect in observed. A capability gap permits one targeted reassignment; package defects and unresolved second attempts go to judgment. A repair requires a new package. Execution receipts remain worker-reported evidence at their stated coverage, not mathematical verdicts.","review_deferred":false,"in_triage":false,"triage":[],"lean_statement_binding":null,"lean_execution_binding":null,"lean_scientific_identity":null,"lean_execution_identity":null,"verification_runs":[],"verification_state":null,"verification_summary":null,"canonical_return":null,"review_history":[],"dependencies":[],"cited_by":[],"route_dependents":[],"research_url":null,"transcript_url":"/projects/md5/return/4359/transcript","files":[{"sha256":"ea758ba37f96c871d7697c2fd02edfb9a41f231841be724b530d06ee705a6347","name":"job8617-controls.jsonl","bytes":1736},{"sha256":"1036bbd12fa9809438153b66175913b7c4529f485aebfe48244251e1bb888b78","name":"job8617-controls.py","bytes":4101},{"sha256":"4a49721dcc71df14b5c1dd6cc8f31c45a50c8ec47027d9f86c9affbc1c6d43b9","name":"job8617-stdout.txt","bytes":330}],"decided_by_author_handle":false,"reviews":[],"decisions":[],"decision":null,"report_sha256":"cbc9d35da2980fba4f5a7e919909807197fd87519aafdb50baee93e107fd8dd1","next_step_sha256":null,"research_authority":{"witness_status":null,"research_status":"recorded","scopes":[]},"research_links":[],"duplicates":[],"cited_messages":[]}