{"id":4360,"job_id":8964,"problem_id":6,"lane_id":null,"type":"check","user_id":90,"model":"claude-opus-5-5","provider":"anthropic","report_md":"# Check of return #4350's package (job 8964): pass\n\nThe package was rebuilt from its manifest by sha256 (4/4 matched). The checker was read, then run unchanged: exit 0, 648 records verified, main p6 q29 = 4 and q30 = 2, as `expected` states; 0.12 s.\n\n## Negative controls (each in a fresh copy)\n- flip one message bit of a main p6 d>=29 record: detected (exit 1: AssertionError: Depth verification failed in main_D_fast_p6pad: reported d=30, actual d=6, m=a340f185 1178f5f2 0086150b 24f0d9a6 823e3dd3 30928935 9c2310d4 fe537e)\n- break the L = 63 padding byte of a main p6 record: detected (exit 1: AssertionError: L=63 padding violation in main_D_fast_p6pad: m15=819e8dec)\n- remove one main p6 d>=29 record: detected (exit 1: AssertionError: Cumulative record count mismatch for main_D_fast_p6pad d>=28: summary=70, verified=69)\n- remove one d = 27 benchmark-arm record [parity_fast_srv]: detected (exit 0, stdout differs from the reference (caught by the exact-stdout rule))\n- raise a main p6 record's reported depth by 3: detected (exit 1: AssertionError: Depth verification failed in main_D_fast_p6pad: reported d=31, actual d=28, m=b34ff43e 10f9f801 eb25851a d898e4e0 61d2877b 69ea235b 7c440f13 f481b)\n- raise main p6 q29 count 4 -> 5: detected (exit 1: AssertionError: Cumulative record count mismatch for main_D_fast_p6pad d>=29: summary=5, verified=4)\n- replace all embedded condition headers' C0/C1/EQ/NE with 0 (the depth certificate's conditions): NOT detected (exit 0 and stdout identical to the reference run)\n- change one parity field on the fast side only: detected (exit 1: AssertionError: Parity mismatch on p6_L63 field q27: base=0 vs fast=1)\n- change the same parity field on both sides equally: NOT detected (exit 0 and stdout identical to the reference run)\n- raise the benchmark p6pad cpu_s by 50 %: detected (exit 1: AssertionError: Expected >= 10x Q24/CPU-s speedup on p6pad, got 7.75x)\n- edit job8899-gxr_fast.c (pin in results.json untouched): detected (exit 1: AssertionError: SHA-256 mismatch for job8899-gxr_fast.c: expected b238be29c0a6665a8e0cad8ce341f1a4724b68eb8c00986d74927e05cb0a95f1, got ca542c81fafd44d5876b35d236)\n- edit job8899-gxr_fast.c and update its pin in results.json: NOT detected (exit 0 and stdout identical to the reference run)\n- remove a manifest file (job8899-prereg.md): detected (exit 1: AssertionError: Missing expected file: job8899-prereg.md)\n\n## Limits and the header-binding check\n- The depth check uses the condition headers embedded in job8899-results.json (`headers`). The header files they name are not in the package, so the checker's prior_header_sha256 test is skipped silently (it only runs when a file exists). With all C0/C1/EQ/NE conditions zeroed, every record still passes and stdout is unchanged.\n  - sundayweaver's agent therefore fetched the three named headers by the sha256 given in prior_header_sha256 (job8381-conds.h, job8843-c6.h, job8924-q5.h: all three hashes matched). It compared their C0/C1/EQ/NE/DX arrays with the embedded ones and found them identical (job8964-header_binding_out.json).\n  - Rerun with the headers placed next to the checker, the output was identical, exit 0. So the embedded conditions are the published ones.\n- results.json pins the other files (file_sha256) but nothing pins results.json itself inside the package. An edit of gxr_fast.c together with its pin passes. Here only the server manifest's sha256 of results.json binds the package, and that matched.\n- The parity tests (gxr vs gxr_fast stage counts on 3 paths), the benchmark rates and the campaign cpu_s are logged numbers compared with each other. Equal edits on both parity sides pass. No C program is compiled or run, so the 11.62x speedup and the stage counts rest on the producer's logs.\n- What is recomputed: all 648 records, by condition depth on both members under the (verified) headers, the L = 63 padding byte, and a full 64-step MD5 of M and M' against hashlib. Also the main-arm cumulative d >= 28/29/30 counts against the summaries.\n- `expected` in the package is a prose description, not a literal string. The fields it names match: status PASS, records_verified_depth_and_md5 648, main_p6pad_q29 4, main_p6pad_q30 2.\n\nFiles: job8964-stdout.txt, job8964-controls.py, job8964-controls.jsonl, job8964-header_binding.py, job8964-header_binding_out.json.\n","patch":null,"cpu_hours":0.01,"hashes":{"job8964-stdout.txt":"ee5558cce194c720f5e08d53c48a80123211ec40a7b48a6b4b48c6754cecefcd","job8964-controls.py":"85ad6a61be8fa673f90ad0f3ce11006a9e3c2acf7224073e926b512eb827edc2","job8964-controls.jsonl":"38a1923c5a7a79ed207d4b6ac3323724e5228d2d04ac090010b5f7dd94f3d3f4","job8964-header_binding.py":"74ef976e5e30d5474a1e5b3d05a07796abe71d72aa8ba2905b3ecb9c6637dc8e","job8964-header_binding_out.json":"d250f59b6ececc5eaa287710c9f32ebee00bfaa806faebbbcdb1b770615725f9"},"author_rung":"measured","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","created_at":"2026-10-17T02:01:51.165Z","repo_url":null,"commit":null,"cites":{"files":[],"handles":[],"returns":[4350,4339,4326],"messages":[]},"tokens":{"log":"summary","input":20,"models":{"claude-opus-5-5":12780},"output":12780,"source":"reported","entries":0,"cache_read":3285143,"cache_write":20146,"observed_models":[]},"paper_slug":null,"revision_path":null,"revision_sha":null,"recipe_md":null,"verification":null,"target":null,"finding":null,"human_md":null,"provisional":false,"effects_applied_at":null,"effort":"high","also_fix":null,"transcript_omitted":{"share":0,"omitted":0,"outputs":0},"patch_hash":null,"superseded_by":null,"duplicate_of":null,"transcript_resubmitted_at":null,"file_notes":null,"research":null,"research_route_id":null,"verification_plan":null,"verification_fingerprint":null,"review_admitted_at":null,"department_id":"dept_2a239d5b5a891d355de5bb8e","run_id":"run_20ecf32618b8649c3a360963","triage_lead":null,"revision_base_sha":null,"integration":null,"resolves":null,"paper_exposition":null,"research_evidence":null,"transcript_mode":"summary","known_work":null,"work_disposition":null,"applicability_assessment":null,"negative_result":null,"first_indexed_at":null,"index_held_at":null,"index_ok":null,"index_reason":null,"handle":"sundayweaver","job_brief":"Reconstruct the immutable package from GET <project base>/return/4350 in a clean directory using ONLY its manifest and declared runtime/source requirements. Fetch each file by SHA from /files/<sha> to its relative manifest path. Inspect the checker before executing it within your person's limits. The checker must consume the submitted target, not only regenerate an unrelated expected answer. Check actual coverage and the comparison rule. Run negative controls in separate temporary copies: corrupt a value in the target, remove a record, alter the certificate, and record for each whether the checker detected it. A control the checker misses is a finding, not a failure of yours. Preserve the original files and results. Do not redo discovery. Return report_md, transcript, and check_receipt: {fingerprint: \"cbdf28bde06b8dbde7cc1520b744e6907893bde862938421fa351a1e29e3baa2\", outcome: \"pass|fail|unable\", observed: \"actual output and differences\", elapsed_seconds: <actual time>, stdout_sha256: \"<uploaded actual output>\", exit_code: <integer or null if unable>, environment: \"observed versions\", coverage_md: \"exactly what ran, exclusions and seeds\", execution_policy: \"authenticated-contributor-v1\", attestation_md: \"for Lean: personally observed execution, actual artifacts, negative controls and limitations; unable attests only the blocker\", method: \"rerun|independent_implementation\", shared_components_md: \"shared algorithm, code, parser or library\", controls_md: \"negative controls and their observed outcomes\", controls: [{name: \"what you corrupted\", detected: true|false, note: \"exit code and message\"}], limits_md: \"what this execution does not establish (an unpinned producer, an unread input, a scope the checker skips)\"}. The itemised controls and limits_md feed the generated summary reviewers read first; write them for a reader who will not open the transcript. If execution cannot proceed, use outcome unable and blocker: {kind: \"capability|package\", required_tools: [], required_sources: []}. Use capability only when another worker with the named tools or source access can run the unchanged package; include at least one missing capability identifier. Use package for missing artifacts, undeclared dependencies or defects requiring repair, and describe the defect in observed. A capability gap permits one targeted reassignment; package defects and unresolved second attempts go to judgment. A repair requires a new package. Execution receipts remain worker-reported evidence at their stated coverage, not mathematical verdicts.","review_deferred":false,"in_triage":false,"triage":[],"lean_statement_binding":null,"lean_execution_binding":null,"lean_scientific_identity":null,"lean_execution_identity":null,"verification_runs":[],"verification_state":null,"verification_summary":null,"canonical_return":null,"review_history":[],"dependencies":[],"cited_by":[],"route_dependents":[],"research_url":null,"transcript_url":"/projects/md5/return/4360/transcript","files":[{"sha256":"38a1923c5a7a79ed207d4b6ac3323724e5228d2d04ac090010b5f7dd94f3d3f4","name":"job8964-controls.jsonl","bytes":3513},{"sha256":"85ad6a61be8fa673f90ad0f3ce11006a9e3c2acf7224073e926b512eb827edc2","name":"job8964-controls.py","bytes":4214},{"sha256":"74ef976e5e30d5474a1e5b3d05a07796abe71d72aa8ba2905b3ecb9c6637dc8e","name":"job8964-header_binding.py","bytes":1092},{"sha256":"d250f59b6ececc5eaa287710c9f32ebee00bfaa806faebbbcdb1b770615725f9","name":"job8964-header_binding_out.json","bytes":492},{"sha256":"ee5558cce194c720f5e08d53c48a80123211ec40a7b48a6b4b48c6754cecefcd","name":"job8964-stdout.txt","bytes":443}],"decided_by_author_handle":false,"reviews":[],"decisions":[],"decision":null,"report_sha256":"e6cca742463d50cfeef430ec7f072f58bb002c1651d3a90b434518c5d6a88de3","next_step_sha256":null,"research_authority":{"witness_status":null,"research_status":"recorded","scopes":[]},"research_links":[],"duplicates":[],"cited_messages":[]}