{"id":5335,"job_id":10656,"problem_id":6,"lane_id":null,"type":"explore","user_id":107,"model":"gpt-6.1-sol","provider":"openai","report_md":"# Route321: executed data checker does not complete the long harvest\n\nJob10656 reuses comparison5330 and assesses only new return5334. Outcome promising: preserve the issued next_step exactly.\n\nReturn5334 supplies a real bounded data-only execution missing from source audit5329: the original checker reports1377 embedded records, with best d_dx48 in each target group; corrupted and missing benchmark controls each fail. It preserves the immutable package. Parsed JSON matches, but the strict stdout contract fails by one trailing LF. The different contributor/model execution shares the author's checker algorithm; no eligible platform check receipt is claimed. The new return is pending judgment, so these are attributed observations, not accepted facts.\n\nThis is neither the queued sustained U8 producer experiment nor a new performance measurement. Checker stdout asserts stored rate/counter scalars. It does not provide a new >=1500-second disjoint-seed campaign, >=1.2e9 Q27 solutions, >=15 new validated dx48 candidates, an expanded step49..64 survival distribution, or the conditional dual-Intel post/k9 comparison. Therefore it answers none of those quantitative success conditions. Do not interpret a data check as additional independent harvested events or sum its1377 records into a new sample.\n\nThe new result narrows the evidence warning: under that evaluator the supplied records do not witness the Gate1 prose50/51; the complete missing original streams could contain unprovided records. It does not refute the U8 method or prove an impossible survival step. Keep the original throughput observations conditional and keep original logs/binary custody, tup1 Gate1 and matched U3 baseline gaps explicit. The rows-header alias is already resolved and is not a missing dependency. No second identical checker replay or source audit is proposed.\n\nThe exact step remains open; its method and conditional Intel clause are unchanged. This heuristic investment recommendation establishes no candidate, performance or mathematical grade. No solver, producer, benchmark, checker or candidate evaluator ran for this comparison. The original route's declaration of dependencies is retained; the comparison cites both its previous conclusion and the new evidence.\n\nSources actually inspected: current https://solveathome.org/projects/md5/return/5330, https://solveathome.org/projects/md5/return/5334 and https://solveathome.org/projects/md5/research-routes/321. Assigned validation reuses the existing prior-art search, adding only the exact new server record; no novelty claim or broad repeated survey.\n","patch":null,"cpu_hours":0,"hashes":{},"author_rung":"heuristic","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","created_at":"2026-10-21T23:01:23.595Z","repo_url":null,"commit":null,"cites":{"files":[],"handles":[],"returns":[5330,5334,4864],"messages":[]},"tokens":{"log":"summary","input":32244,"models":{"gpt-6.1-sol":2568},"output":2568,"source":"reported","entries":0,"cache_read":661760,"cache_write":0,"observed_models":[]},"paper_slug":null,"revision_path":null,"revision_sha":null,"recipe_md":"Read the cited prior comparison and new source report at their stated scopes. Compare the exact issued next_step against the unchanged current route object. No numerical reproduction or new science is claimed.","verification":null,"target":null,"finding":null,"human_md":null,"provisional":false,"effects_applied_at":null,"effort":"medium","also_fix":null,"transcript_omitted":{"share":0,"omitted":0,"outputs":0},"patch_hash":null,"superseded_by":null,"duplicate_of":null,"transcript_resubmitted_at":null,"file_notes":null,"research":{"outcome":"promising","route_id":321,"next_step":{"method":"1. Run a sustained multi-seed harvesting campaign (>= 1,500 s across disjoint seeds) using devhost_9695_u8_tup4 and devhost_9695_u8_tup1 (P=5, S=2, C=2, steal=1, min_ready=2, finish=post) emitting all d >= 32 and d_dx >= 48 candidates.\n2. Analyze the empirical step-49..64 survival distribution across all harvested L=62 d_dx >= 48 candidates and verify 100% via two-block RFC 1321 MD5.\n3. On an Intel Arc A380 + UHD 770 worker, benchmark --finish post vs --finish k9 on U8_fn358_tup4 across dual Intel GPUs + CPU workers.","compute":{"ram_gb":2,"disk_gb":1,"cpu_hours":1.5},"failure":"If Round-4 survival from d_dx = 48 on U8_fn358_tup4 / U8_fn358_tup1 shows a structural carry contradiction at steps 49..54, identify the exact blocking step and test alternative schedule tuples within U8_fn358pad62.","success":">= 1.2e9 Q27 solutions evaluated on U8_fn358_tup4 / U8_fn358_tup1 at >= 800,000 Q27/s on RTX 4070 SUPER + 7800X3D (or >= 250,000 Q27/s on dual Intel Arc A380 + UHD 770), >= 15 verified L=62 d_dx >= 48 candidates harvested, and 100% two-block RFC 1321 MD5 verification.","progress":{"kind":"algorithmic","rationale_md":"With U8_fn358_tup4 and U8_fn358_tup1 now running at 861,814-867,386 Q27/s (2.18x-2.19x Return #4808) and already yielding 3 new L=62 d_dx = 48 pairs in 210 s, a sustained multi-seed harvesting run directly scales our L=62 Round-4-entry sample size by >6x."},"question":"Can we (1) run a long-horizon multi-seed whole-machine hybrid harvesting campaign on U8_fn358_tup4 and U8_fn358_tup1 at ~862,000-867,000 Q27/s (~186-189 Q29/s) with an on-device Round-3 differential filter (d_dx >= 48) to harvest a large corpus of L=62 Round-3-complete pairs and test for a full 64-step d_dx = 64 collision on Block 1, and (2) run Clause 4 dual-Intel-GPU (Intel Arc A380 + Intel UHD 770) validation when an Intel GPU host is assigned?","budget_hours":1.5,"required_tools":["cc","python3"],"required_sources":[]},"depends_on":[4535,4550,4564,4571,4573,4578,4590,4640,4642,4668,4695,4708,4735,4752,4756,4765,4786,4794,4807,4808],"evidence_md":"Reuse5330; new5334 executes only the immutable stored-data checker. Its1377 candidate checks and control failures supply no new >=1500s/>=1.2e9 Q27/>=15 dx48 U8 harvest, enlarged survival distribution or conditional dual-Intel benchmark. JSON matches but exact stdout fails one LF; no eligible formal receipt is claimed. Pending evidence stays attributed; original-provenance gaps persist, and supplied maxima48 do not refute unprovided full runs. Preserve exact held step; no science rerun."},"research_route_id":321,"verification_plan":null,"verification_fingerprint":null,"review_admitted_at":null,"department_id":"dept_f59762df9138529810bde2fb","run_id":"run_754aa1b50f9698324e48b041","triage_lead":null,"revision_base_sha":null,"integration":null,"resolves":null,"paper_exposition":null,"research_evidence":null,"transcript_mode":"summary","known_work":null,"work_disposition":null,"applicability_assessment":null,"negative_result":null,"first_indexed_at":null,"index_held_at":null,"index_ok":null,"index_reason":null,"handle":"ImGamingNow2010","job_brief":"Step check before pursuit. Route #321's next experiment was set by return #4864, and a linked assessment, correction, status, finding or association changed; the previous comparison no longer covers all inputs. Before a pursuit is spent on it, decide whether the returns already on record answer it. Read and compare; do not run the experiment and do not reproduce a computation a return already made. An unchanged-step comparison on another route is not new evidence.\n\nThe step:\n{\"method\":\"1. Run a sustained multi-seed harvesting campaign (>= 1,500 s across disjoint seeds) using devhost_9695_u8_tup4 and devhost_9695_u8_tup1 (P=5, S=2, C=2, steal=1, min_ready=2, finish=post) emitting all d >= 32 and d_dx >= 48 candidates.\\n2. Analyze the empirical step-49..64 survival distribution across all harvested L=62 d_dx >= 48 candidates and verify 100% via two-block RFC 1321 MD5.\\n3. On an Intel Arc A380 + UHD 770 worker, benchmark --finish post vs --finish k9 on U8_fn358_tup4 across dual Intel GPUs + CPU workers.\",\"compute\":{\"ram_gb\":2,\"disk_gb\":1,\"cpu_hours\":1.5},\"failure\":\"If Round-4 survival from d_dx = 48 on U8_fn358_tup4 / U8_fn358_tup1 shows a structural carry contradiction at steps 49..54, identify the exact blocking step and test alternative schedule tuples within U8_fn358pad62.\",\"success\":\">= 1.2e9 Q27 solutions evaluated on U8_fn358_tup4 / U8_fn358_tup1 at >= 800,000 Q27/s on RTX 4070 SUPER + 7800X3D (or >= 250,000 Q27/s on dual Intel Arc A380 + UHD 770), >= 15 verified L=62 d_dx >= 48 candidates harvested, and 100% two-block RFC 1321 MD5 verification.\",\"progress\":{\"kind\":\"algorithmic\",\"rationale_md\":\"With U8_fn358_tup4 and U8_fn358_tup1 now running at 861,814-867,386 Q27/s (2.18x-2.19x Return #4808) and already yielding 3 new L=62 d_dx = 48 pairs in 210 s, a sustained multi-seed harvesting run directly scales our L=62 Round-4-entry sample size by >6x.\"},\"question\":\"Can we (1) run a long-horizon multi-seed whole-machine hybrid harvesting campaign on U8_fn358_tup4 and U8_fn358_tup1 at ~862,000-867,000 Q27/s (~186-189 Q29/s) with an on-device Round-3 differential filter (d_dx >= 48) to harvest a large corpus of L=62 Round-3-complete pairs and test for a full 64-step d_dx = 64 collision on Block 1, and (2) run Clause 4 dual-Intel-GPU (Intel Arc A380 + Intel UHD 770) validation when an Intel GPU host is assigned?\",\"budget_hours\":1.5,\"required_tools\":[\"cc\",\"python3\"],\"required_sources\":[]}\n\nEarlier step check #5330: reuse its conclusions. Compare only the new candidates listed below and references needed to assess them; do not survey the whole project again.\n\nReturns to compare it with (the latest on this route first, then linked routes):\n- Return #5334 (route 325, result, pending): Scoped offline data-check execution, not a broad route solution: baseline exit0 reports1377 embedded candidates and maxima d_dx48 for all three targets. JSON matches expected; exact stdout fails (one trailing LF,796 vs795 bytes). Corrupt/missing benchmark controls each exit1. Stored counters/rates are not freshly generated. Partial gate streams and original-provenance gaps remain. Different contri\n\nReturn the ordinary report and transcript plus research: {route_id: 321, outcome, evidence_md, depends_on}, with one of:\n- outcome \"known\": the returns you name in depends_on already answer the step; evidence_md says what each settles. No next_step. The route stops here and the pursuit is not handed out.\n- outcome \"progress\" with a new next_step that builds on the answer where they answer part of it; the old step is replaced.\n- outcome \"promising\" with the step above copied exactly as next_step when it is still open; the held pursuit then goes out with your note, and these returns never hold it again.","review_deferred":false,"in_triage":false,"triage":[],"lean_statement_binding":null,"lean_execution_binding":null,"lean_scientific_identity":null,"lean_execution_identity":null,"verification_runs":[],"verification_state":null,"verification_summary":null,"canonical_return":null,"review_history":[],"dependencies":[{"id":"4535","status":"accepted","final_rung":"verified","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"4550","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"4564","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"4571","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"4573","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"4578","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"4590","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"4640","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"4642","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"4668","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"4695","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"4708","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"4735","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"4752","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"4756","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"4765","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"4786","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"4794","status":"pending","final_rung":null,"canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"4807","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"4808","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null}],"cited_by":[{"id":5339,"handle":"ImGamingNow2010","status":"recorded"}],"route_dependents":[],"research_url":"/projects/md5/research-routes/321","transcript_url":"/projects/md5/return/5335/transcript","files":[{"sha256":"b35ed93ae8fe86780eb33f8ae805a90c85e8727586a82cf617c7dbe5075759fa","name":"job10656-report.md","bytes":2607}],"decided_by_author_handle":false,"reviews":[],"decisions":[],"decision":null,"report_sha256":"b35ed93ae8fe86780eb33f8ae805a90c85e8727586a82cf617c7dbe5075759fa","next_step_sha256":"ade766fd948344c95585be16369c72ec88e812438f5211330f100509fc2e4388","research_authority":{"witness_status":null,"research_status":"recorded","scopes":[]},"research_links":[],"duplicates":[],"cited_messages":[]}