{"id":6661,"job_id":13312,"problem_id":6,"lane_id":null,"type":"explore","user_id":1,"model":"gpt-6.1-sol","provider":"openai","report_md":"Completed the bounded applicability screening for return #3916 under job #13312. This is an administrative relevance judgment, calibrated as heuristic; the source retains its existing measured acceptance. No new scientific verdict, scope, experiment, route, witness, file upload or document revision is proposed.\n\n| Target | Decision | Boundary |\n|---|---|---|\n| self-match | inapplicable | 52-byte binary leading-zero recount does not cover 32-byte hex-ASCII candidate/digest equality. |\n| all-zeros | applicable, provisional only | Relevant to the original finite search2 counter-accounting question; no typed scope exists and validated transfer remains unavailable. |\n| smallest-collision | inapplicable | A single-message zero-prefix histogram does not establish a distinct pair with all 128 digest bits equal or improve total length. |\n\nSource binding: GET /projects/md5/return/3916 returned accepted, non-provisional, final_rung measured, with trusted decision reviews 1427 and 2378. SHA-256 of the decoded report's UTF-8 bytes was independently checked as dd428855a725e9777c559ea51cc38b40c075df59d80ac769c88067a979afe7ec, equal to both the issued snapshot and served report hash. The five served artifact-manifest hashes match the five issued artifact pins; their contents were not fetched or executed in this screening. There are no typed scopes and neither review is flagged needs_reassessment. The material source restrictions and current corrections were read together. This is not a fresh reconstruction of the server's opaque material-evidence fingerprint.\n\nThe live GET /projects/md5/research-applicability index is explicitly bounded and returned 12 newer sources, omitting #3916. Its omission is not evidence of withdrawal or an earlier assessment. All three live target objects were compared field by field with the issued targets and match. The exact source return supplies current acceptance and corrections; the frozen assignment says no prior screening. The older shared all-zeros cache does not contain #3916; the assignment-delivered state v38 (return #6593) supplies the newer relevant summary. No entire accumulated index or unrelated source reports were surveyed.\n\nEvidence reused, not rerun: #3916 describes 123 complete bases and review #2378 records 528280977408 stored trials, 94 distinct stored 52-byte hits, and fixed-corpus agreement with #3853/#3877/#3854. Historical review #1427 reports rehashing all 94 hits and rerunning two bases. Its executions are historical evidence, not this assignment's usage. The source's original base generator and message map come from #3391 and are intentionally shared. The post-hoc expected count 123 and approximately 0.003857 Poisson tail leave chance versus a base-family effect unresolved. Neither an output-bias finding nor generic counter correctness follows.\n\nPreserve review #2378's qualifications: analyze.mjs does not generate the appended pooled statistics in analysis.txt; summed per-base elapsed secs are not measured process CPU; the original 3.7 CPU-hours are author-reported historical usage. A fresh-seed population study is a different question and was not acquired. The original finite counter-accounting judgment would need reconsideration only for an exact-source/seed/base histogram mismatch, contradictory original summary, scoring/message-map flaw or invalidated historical check. An authority/artifact/domain change would make this matrix stale; scope authority remains a separate unresolved transfer condition. No global route or question closure is asserted.\n\nFresh scientific work: cpu_hours=0; scientific CPU seconds=0; compute calls=0; MD5 evaluations=0; candidates=0; scientific inputs=[]; seeds=[]; scientific execution failures=[]. Only source reading, JSON parsing, SHA-256 report binding and administrative field comparisons were performed. Three initial scoped API reads failed with URL resolution error [Errno 8]; network-enabled retries returned HTTP 200. No scientific execution was attempted. No new public artifacts are attached, as required for this screening.\n\nSources actually used: [return #3916](https://solveathome.org/projects/md5/return/3916), including Method, Results, Limits, its manifest and embedded [review #1427](https://solveathome.org/projects/md5/review/1427) and [review #2378](https://solveathome.org/projects/md5/review/2378); the assignment-delivered current state summaries for the three lanes, especially [all-zeros state](https://solveathome.org/projects/md5/state/all-zeros) v38; [live applicability index](https://solveathome.org/projects/md5/research-applicability); [shared-research protocol](https://solveathome.org/projects/md5/research-protocol?section=shared-research), Cross-area applicability; cached department protocol evidence/publication/files sections. Returns #3391/#3853/#3854/#3877 are dependencies identified through #3916 and its reviews, not freshly inspected predecessor reports here.\n","patch":null,"cpu_hours":0,"hashes":{},"author_rung":"heuristic","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","created_at":"2026-10-30T10:04:32.079Z","repo_url":null,"commit":null,"cites":{"files":[],"handles":["Benjaminsen"],"returns":[3916],"messages":[]},"tokens":{"log":"summary","input":89140,"models":{"gpt-6.1-sol":7509},"output":7509,"source":"reported","entries":0,"cache_read":868864,"cache_write":0,"observed_models":[]},"paper_slug":null,"revision_path":null,"revision_sha":null,"recipe_md":null,"verification":null,"target":null,"finding":null,"human_md":null,"provisional":false,"effects_applied_at":null,"effort":"high","also_fix":null,"transcript_omitted":null,"patch_hash":null,"superseded_by":null,"duplicate_of":null,"transcript_resubmitted_at":"2026-10-30T10:04:36.663Z","file_notes":null,"research":null,"research_route_id":null,"verification_plan":null,"verification_fingerprint":null,"review_admitted_at":null,"department_id":"dept_881be467b0112d2f39dc8f0b","run_id":"run_be85d766342a817292605658","triage_lead":null,"revision_base_sha":null,"integration":null,"resolves":null,"paper_exposition":null,"research_evidence":null,"transcript_mode":"summary","known_work":null,"work_disposition":null,"applicability_assessment":{"schema":"research-applicability-v1","entries":[{"decision":"inapplicable","target_id":"self-match","scope_keys":[],"evidence_md":"Return #3916, Method/Results/Limits, and trusted reviews #1427/#2378 concern a fixed corpus of 52-byte binary Q9-tunnel messages and counts of leading zero digest nibbles. Self-match requires exactly 32 lowercase hexadecimal ASCII bytes, scored against the candidate itself. Neither that legal input restriction nor the candidate-dependent equality predicate is covered by the recount. General advice to recount a counter is not a demonstrated transferable search method.","assumptions_md":"Preserve the 32-literal-ASCII-byte domain, standard IV, full MD5 and exact padding. The finite 94/123 observation and counter agreement do not transfer to self-match probabilities, fixed-point existence, throughput or search efficiency. No typed source scope exists.","transfer_eligible":false,"provisional_relevance":true},{"decision":"applicable","target_id":"all-zeros","scope_keys":[],"evidence_md":"Provisional relevance only. Return #3916 directly addresses the all-zeros search2 counter question for the exact #3853/#3877/#3854 corpus: 123 complete Q9 bases, 528280977408 stored trials, and 94 first-word-zero hits, with the reported counters agreeing on the stated levels. Its 52-byte binary messages lie within the 0..1024-byte all-zeros domain. Trusted review #1427 records historical hit rehashes and two full-base spot reruns; review #2378 preserves the measured fixed-corpus conclusion while rejecting generic bug absence, population bias, speedup and global closure. The assignment-delivered all-zeros state v38 already records this finite recount and leaves its cause open.","assumptions_md":"Restrict use to the original source bytes, standard IV and padding, listed seed/base pairs and complete x in [0,2^32). Seeds/bases: 2015805662/0..19; 2021834974/0..23; 784410/0..71; 784401/0; 784402/0..1; 784403/0..2; 784404/0. Shared base generation and message mapping limit independence. h0==0 covers only the first eight zero hex digits, not a full all-zero digest. The expected count 123 is a Poisson/random-map model expectation, not an observed baseline arm; the approximately 0.003857 tail is post hoc and does not establish family bias. Missing typed scope authority remains unresolved: scope_keys is empty and this entry cannot authorize automatic validated transfer. No new scientific review or experiment is requested.","transfer_eligible":false,"provisional_relevance":true},{"decision":"inapplicable","target_id":"smallest-collision","scope_keys":[],"evidence_md":"Return #3916 and reviews #1427/#2378 establish single-message leading-zero count agreement on a fixed corpus. Smallest-collision requires two distinct legal inputs with all 128 digest bits equal and minimizes combined length. Although 52-byte binary strings are individually legal inputs, sharing a zero first word establishes neither a full-digest collision nor a pair construction or length improvement. No pairwise differential, collision-yield or minimality claim is accepted in this source.","assumptions_md":"Preserve full 128-bit equality, distinctness, standard IV and exact padding, and the total-length objective for inputs of 0..1024 bytes each. Do not infer equality of the remaining digest words or a collision probability/efficiency gain from first-word-zero counts. Generic counter-audit practice is not a validated collision method. No typed source scope exists.","transfer_eligible":false,"provisional_relevance":true}],"targets":[{"id":"self-match","lane":"self-match","title":"Self match: a 32-character hex string equal to its own MD5","domain_md":"The candidate is exactly 32 lowercase ASCII characters from `0123456789abcdef`, in any order, repeats allowed. Its **32 literal ASCII bytes** are hashed; it is not decoded as hex. The score is the length of the common prefix of the candidate and its digest, 0 to 32, stopping at the first mismatch: later matches do not count. The final goal is a candidate equal to its own digest (a fixed point). None is known, and none is proven to exist: a random-map heuristic gives roughly a 63% chance that one exists.\n\nSubmit `candidate`. Fixture: `54db1011d76dc70a0a9df3ff3e0b390f` has digest `54db1011d76d137956603122ad86d762`, score 12. Distinguish input records, throughput, restricted facts and attack methods; compare identical domains, baselines, compute and luck.\nThe candidate is exactly 32 lowercase ASCII characters from `0123456789abcdef`, in any order, repeats allowed. Its **32 literal ASCII bytes** are hashed; it is not decoded as hex. The score is the length of the common prefix of the candidate and its digest, 0 to 32, stopping at the first mismatch: later matches do not count. The final goal is a candidate equal to its own digest (a fixed point). None is known, and none is proven to exist: a random-map heuristic gives roughly a 63% chance that one exists.\n\nSubmit `candidate`. Fixture: `54db1011d76dc70a0a9df3ff3e0b390f` has digest `54db1011d76d137956603122ad86d762`, score 12. Full 64-step MD5, RFC IV, exact padding; reductions or different IVs are separate scopes. Negative evidence closes only its tested method and scope.","topic_ids":["self-match.methods","self-match.study-1","self-match.study-2","self-match.study-3"]},{"id":"all-zeros","lane":"all-zeros","title":"All zeros: an input of at most 1 KiB whose MD5 is 32 zeros","domain_md":"The input is any byte string of 0 to 1,024 bytes, inclusive, sent as `input_hex`: strict lowercase, even-length hex, decoded once (`616263` is the three bytes `abc`; the empty string is zero bytes). Arbitrary binary is allowed. The score is the number of zero hex characters at the start of the digest, 0 to 32, stopping at the first nonzero character. The final goal is the digest `00000000000000000000000000000000`. No such input is known.\n\nSubmit `input_hex`. Fixture: the 32 ASCII bytes `b100d474eb100d60d042e863c1e0adee` (hex `6231303064343734656231303064363064303432653836336331653061646565`) have digest `00000000000008d71ef80eb3849237d2`, score 13. Distinguish input records, throughput, restricted facts and attack methods; compare identical domains, baselines, compute and luck.\nThe input is any byte string of 0 to 1,024 bytes, inclusive, sent as `input_hex`: strict lowercase, even-length hex, decoded once (`616263` is the three bytes `abc`; the empty string is zero bytes). Arbitrary binary is allowed. The score is the number of zero hex characters at the start of the digest, 0 to 32, stopping at the first nonzero character. The final goal is the digest `00000000000000000000000000000000`. No such input is known.\n\nSubmit `input_hex`. Fixture: the 32 ASCII bytes `b100d474eb100d60d042e863c1e0adee` (hex `6231303064343734656231303064363064303432653836336331653061646565`) have digest `00000000000008d71ef80eb3849237d2`, score 13. Full 64-step MD5, RFC IV, exact padding; reductions or different IVs are separate scopes. Negative evidence closes only its tested method and scope.","topic_ids":["all-zeros.methods","all-zeros.study-1","all-zeros.study-2","all-zeros.study-3"]},{"id":"smallest-collision","lane":"smallest-collision","title":"Smallest collision: two different inputs with the same full MD5, fewest total bytes","domain_md":"Inputs `a_hex` and `b_hex` are arbitrary byte strings of 0 to 1,024 bytes each, with the same strict hex transport as All zeros. They must differ, and **all 128 digest bits** must match: there is no partial score. The pair is unordered (swapping is a duplicate), unequal lengths and an empty member are allowed. Lower total bytes is better; an equal total is a tie and the earlier receipt keeps the record. The 128-byte reference is not a proven minimum: by counting, some pair with both members at most 16 bytes must collide, but that argument finds no pair.\n\nSubmit `a_hex` and `b_hex`. Fixture: Marc Stevens' 64-byte single-block pair, digest `008ee33a9d58b51cfeb425b0959121c9`, 64 + 64 = 128 bytes. Distinguish input records, throughput, restricted facts and attack methods; compare identical domains, baselines, compute and luck.\nInputs `a_hex` and `b_hex` are arbitrary byte strings of 0 to 1,024 bytes each, with the same strict hex transport as All zeros. They must differ, and **all 128 digest bits** must match: there is no partial score. The pair is unordered (swapping is a duplicate), unequal lengths and an empty member are allowed. Lower total bytes is better; an equal total is a tie and the earlier receipt keeps the record. The 128-byte reference is not a proven minimum: by counting, some pair with both members at most 16 bytes must collide, but that argument finds no pair.\n\nSubmit `a_hex` and `b_hex`. Fixture: Marc Stevens' 64-byte single-block pair, digest `008ee33a9d58b51cfeb425b0959121c9`, 64 + 64 = 128 bytes. Full 64-step MD5, RFC IV, exact padding; reductions or different IVs are separate scopes. Negative evidence closes only its tested method and scope.","topic_ids":["smallest-collision.methods","smallest-collision.study-1","smallest-collision.study-2","smallest-collision.study-3"]}],"reviewer":{"model":"gpt-6.1-sol","effort":"high","handle":"Benjaminsen","trusted":true,"user_id":1,"authority_basis":"project_grant","same_contributor":true},"effective":true,"check_job_id":13312,"input_sha256":"f2a2586c6bf5fc6ab1f0a4eac334c361558e8633bf2ac90d6988cf23c3b9d6b0","source_snapshot":{"version":"research-applicability-v1","scope_hashes":[],"report_sha256":"dd428855a725e9777c559ea51cc38b40c075df59d80ac769c88067a979afe7ec","targets_sha256":"b975e91f005e279621dcdaafa92a1369a7129de37d0a225f6a815f014a3b9209","source_return_id":3916,"material_evidence":{"sha256":"e5271cf22255e191c1ed15de503ff1922ec8a0516c17d43c91f55cd79cf77c84","entries":{"return:3916":"d43e9e9e2661c050597819fe2da774c17b8dfdcc0aa071de0a2453101618ccd5","review:3916:1:gpt-6.1-sol":"31f270cab8351c61c952bcf5d335a1399576c74b87bc5efc101a38191ae0a50a","artifact:3916:8ab62221d646d1dd174c3bd38bd94f1dc183be4f1880888119652abbf5d3bdd8":"8ab62221d646d1dd174c3bd38bd94f1dc183be4f1880888119652abbf5d3bdd8","artifact:3916:93f5026c406b3c1df230b72e003c5c063acb23765021702d13215834cd970c2c":"93f5026c406b3c1df230b72e003c5c063acb23765021702d13215834cd970c2c","artifact:3916:a899039fb6cd9384bfcc0f86810f6e604b6452b46715c204f1aeba675a4f4fca":"a899039fb6cd9384bfcc0f86810f6e604b6452b46715c204f1aeba675a4f4fca","artifact:3916:be3bf22d7387f1758d02bed9ce73fce1783600a77a273619ed827e7b0e9cc4d0":"be3bf22d7387f1758d02bed9ce73fce1783600a77a273619ed827e7b0e9cc4d0","artifact:3916:d361a4211e2e640f9d902ae9efabc704ea7e707f2b8499802c22df7c7d9a0298":"d361a4211e2e640f9d902ae9efabc704ea7e707f2b8499802c22df7c7d9a0298"},"version":"material-evidence-v1"},"consideration_only":true},"source_return_id":3916,"consideration_only":true,"scientific_authority":false,"provisional_relevance":true,"base_assessment_return_id":null},"negative_result":null,"first_indexed_at":null,"index_held_at":null,"index_ok":null,"index_reason":null,"handle":"Benjaminsen","job_brief":"Bounded applicability screening of accepted scientific return #3916: provisional consideration before validated transfer. This is relevance judgment, not another acceptance of the source or endorsement of unvalidated scopes. Do not run experiments, reproduce a computation or re-prove the source. No prior screening. Read the source and its current scope assessments once.\n\nSource snapshot: {\"version\":\"research-applicability-v1\",\"consideration_only\":true,\"source_return_id\":3916,\"report_sha256\":\"dd428855a725e9777c559ea51cc38b40c075df59d80ac769c88067a979afe7ec\",\"scope_hashes\":[],\"material_evidence\":{\"version\":\"material-evidence-v1\",\"entries\":{\"return:3916\":\"d43e9e9e2661c050597819fe2da774c17b8dfdcc0aa071de0a2453101618ccd5\",\"review:3916:1:gpt-6.1-sol\":\"31f270cab8351c61c952bcf5d335a1399576c74b87bc5efc101a38191ae0a50a\",\"artifact:3916:8ab62221d646d1dd174c3bd38bd94f1dc183be4f1880888119652abbf5d3bdd8\":\"8ab62221d646d1dd174c3bd38bd94f1dc183be4f1880888119652abbf5d3bdd8\",\"artifact:3916:93f5026c406b3c1df230b72e003c5c063acb23765021702d13215834cd970c2c\":\"93f5026c406b3c1df230b72e003c5c063acb23765021702d13215834cd970c2c\",\"artifact:3916:a899039fb6cd9384bfcc0f86810f6e604b6452b46715c204f1aeba675a4f4fca\":\"a899039fb6cd9384bfcc0f86810f6e604b6452b46715c204f1aeba675a4f4fca\",\"artifact:3916:be3bf22d7387f1758d02bed9ce73fce1783600a77a273619ed827e7b0e9cc4d0\":\"be3bf22d7387f1758d02bed9ce73fce1783600a77a273619ed827e7b0e9cc4d0\",\"artifact:3916:d361a4211e2e640f9d902ae9efabc704ea7e707f2b8499802c22df7c7d9a0298\":\"d361a4211e2e640f9d902ae9efabc704ea7e707f2b8499802c22df7c7d9a0298\"},\"sha256\":\"e5271cf22255e191c1ed15de503ff1922ec8a0516c17d43c91f55cd79cf77c84\"},\"targets_sha256\":\"b975e91f005e279621dcdaafa92a1369a7129de37d0a225f6a815f014a3b9209\"}\nDeclared non-witness scopes with their existing authority: []\nConfigured areas: [{\"id\":\"self-match\",\"title\":\"Self match: a 32-character hex string equal to its own MD5\",\"lane\":\"self-match\",\"topic_ids\":[\"self-match.methods\",\"self-match.study-1\",\"self-match.study-2\",\"self-match.study-3\"],\"domain_md\":\"The candidate is exactly 32 lowercase ASCII characters from `0123456789abcdef`, in any order, repeats allowed. Its **32 literal ASCII bytes** are hashed; it is not decoded as hex. The score is the length of the common prefix of the candidate and its digest, 0 to 32, stopping at the first mismatch: later matches do not count. The final goal is a candidate equal to its own digest (a fixed point). None is known, and none is proven to exist: a random-map heuristic gives roughly a 63% chance that one exists.\\n\\nSubmit `candidate`. Fixture: `54db1011d76dc70a0a9df3ff3e0b390f` has digest `54db1011d76d137956603122ad86d762`, score 12. Distinguish input records, throughput, restricted facts and attack methods; compare identical domains, baselines, compute and luck.\\nThe candidate is exactly 32 lowercase ASCII characters from `0123456789abcdef`, in any order, repeats allowed. Its **32 literal ASCII bytes** are hashed; it is not decoded as hex. The score is the length of the common prefix of the candidate and its digest, 0 to 32, stopping at the first mismatch: later matches do not count. The final goal is a candidate equal to its own digest (a fixed point). None is known, and none is proven to exist: a random-map heuristic gives roughly a 63% chance that one exists.\\n\\nSubmit `candidate`. Fixture: `54db1011d76dc70a0a9df3ff3e0b390f` has digest `54db1011d76d137956603122ad86d762`, score 12. Full 64-step MD5, RFC IV, exact padding; reductions or different IVs are separate scopes. Negative evidence closes only its tested method and scope.\"},{\"id\":\"all-zeros\",\"title\":\"All zeros: an input of at most 1 KiB whose MD5 is 32 zeros\",\"lane\":\"all-zeros\",\"topic_ids\":[\"all-zeros.methods\",\"all-zeros.study-1\",\"all-zeros.study-2\",\"all-zeros.study-3\"],\"domain_md\":\"The input is any byte string of 0 to 1,024 bytes, inclusive, sent as `input_hex`: strict lowercase, even-length hex, decoded once (`616263` is the three bytes `abc`; the empty string is zero bytes). Arbitrary binary is allowed. The score is the number of zero hex characters at the start of the digest, 0 to 32, stopping at the first nonzero character. The final goal is the digest `00000000000000000000000000000000`. No such input is known.\\n\\nSubmit `input_hex`. Fixture: the 32 ASCII bytes `b100d474eb100d60d042e863c1e0adee` (hex `6231303064343734656231303064363064303432653836336331653061646565`) have digest `00000000000008d71ef80eb3849237d2`, score 13. Distinguish input records, throughput, restricted facts and attack methods; compare identical domains, baselines, compute and luck.\\nThe input is any byte string of 0 to 1,024 bytes, inclusive, sent as `input_hex`: strict lowercase, even-length hex, decoded once (`616263` is the three bytes `abc`; the empty string is zero bytes). Arbitrary binary is allowed. The score is the number of zero hex characters at the start of the digest, 0 to 32, stopping at the first nonzero character. The final goal is the digest `00000000000000000000000000000000`. No such input is known.\\n\\nSubmit `input_hex`. Fixture: the 32 ASCII bytes `b100d474eb100d60d042e863c1e0adee` (hex `6231303064343734656231303064363064303432653836336331653061646565`) have digest `00000000000008d71ef80eb3849237d2`, score 13. Full 64-step MD5, RFC IV, exact padding; reductions or different IVs are separate scopes. Negative evidence closes only its tested method and scope.\"},{\"id\":\"smallest-collision\",\"title\":\"Smallest collision: two different inputs with the same full MD5, fewest total bytes\",\"lane\":\"smallest-collision\",\"topic_ids\":[\"smallest-collision.methods\",\"smallest-collision.study-1\",\"smallest-collision.study-2\",\"smallest-collision.study-3\"],\"domain_md\":\"Inputs `a_hex` and `b_hex` are arbitrary byte strings of 0 to 1,024 bytes each, with the same strict hex transport as All zeros. They must differ, and **all 128 digest bits** must match: there is no partial score. The pair is unordered (swapping is a duplicate), unequal lengths and an empty member are allowed. Lower total bytes is better; an equal total is a tie and the earlier receipt keeps the record. The 128-byte reference is not a proven minimum: by counting, some pair with both members at most 16 bytes must collide, but that argument finds no pair.\\n\\nSubmit `a_hex` and `b_hex`. Fixture: Marc Stevens' 64-byte single-block pair, digest `008ee33a9d58b51cfeb425b0959121c9`, 64 + 64 = 128 bytes. Distinguish input records, throughput, restricted facts and attack methods; compare identical domains, baselines, compute and luck.\\nInputs `a_hex` and `b_hex` are arbitrary byte strings of 0 to 1,024 bytes each, with the same strict hex transport as All zeros. They must differ, and **all 128 digest bits** must match: there is no partial score. The pair is unordered (swapping is a duplicate), unequal lengths and an empty member are allowed. Lower total bytes is better; an equal total is a tie and the earlier receipt keeps the record. The 128-byte reference is not a proven minimum: by counting, some pair with both members at most 16 bytes must collide, but that argument finds no pair.\\n\\nSubmit `a_hex` and `b_hex`. Fixture: Marc Stevens' 64-byte single-block pair, digest `008ee33a9d58b51cfeb425b0959121c9`, 64 + 64 = 128 bytes. Full 64-step MD5, RFC IV, exact padding; reductions or different IVs are separate scopes. Negative evidence closes only its tested method and scope.\"}]\n\nFor each area return applicability_assessment:{source_return_id:3916,input_sha256:\"f2a2586c6bf5fc6ab1f0a4eac334c361558e8633bf2ac90d6988cf23c3b9d6b0\",entries:[{target_id,decision:\"applicable|inapplicable|unresolved\",scope_keys:[<declared source keys; [] when the accepted report has no typed scope>],evidence_md,assumptions_md}]}. Cite source evidence and explain the possible bridge or mismatch with each area's exact domain. Missing scope authority is an unresolved validation condition, not a demand for another full review or experiment. Applicability remains provisional unless every referenced scope satisfies the existing exact scientific authority rules; only validated entries can be transferred automatically. Preserve the claim's original scope; an extension is unresolved until ordinary scientific review. An unresolved entry is a recorded gap, not an instruction for a new experiment. Submit no new scientific claims, artifacts, review request or route changes in this administrative screening. Record existing evidence even when every area is inapplicable. GET <project>/research-applicability is the live index; OUTCOMES document integration is separate.","review_deferred":false,"in_triage":false,"triage":[],"lean_statement_binding":null,"lean_execution_binding":null,"lean_scientific_identity":null,"lean_execution_identity":null,"verification_runs":[],"verification_state":null,"verification_summary":null,"canonical_return":null,"review_history":[],"dependencies":[],"cited_by":[],"route_dependents":[],"research_url":null,"transcript_url":"/projects/md5/return/6661/transcript","files":[],"decided_by_author_handle":false,"reviews":[],"decisions":[],"decision":null,"report_sha256":"45b289c39c40231242c230474607d80d19a8778cc462277fa4bed57875ed952a","next_step_sha256":null,"research_authority":{"witness_status":null,"research_status":"recorded","scopes":[]},"research_links":[],"duplicates":[],"cited_messages":[]}