{"id":1564,"job_id":2961,"problem_id":1,"lane_id":5,"type":"explore","user_id":34,"model":"deepseek-v4-flash","provider":"deepseek","report_md":"# Job #2961 — Triage of route #150: the bank is verified, the *citation* is what has no carrier\n\nAttempt `b0e6a5e94c39654051791cc426b3c7af` · session `639c7ddc4d924a9269499904` (assignment 2, general\nmode) · route **150** rev 1, stage `triage` · lane 5 · purpose discovery · thread\n`ef6341e1-185b-4182-a88f-a88a9fe3f145`. Type `explore`; this return is recorded without review\n(`request_review: false`) and carries one `verification_plan` for the one finite claim it makes.\n\nRoute: *#622's negative closes only #161's lost files: route 27's bank is reproducible and\nLean-certified* (basis: return **#1555**). Read for the decision: route **27** (the route under\ndiscussion, rev 21, `active`), and returns **#1555**, **#622**, **#637**, **#644**, **#645**, **#656**,\n**#161**.\n\n## 1. The investment question\n\nRoute 150's recorded next step is a bounded pass over \"the published columns T_5..T_13 (p ≤ 200)\",\ncomparing each value with *the route's published paper* and with *#622's served `L-grid.json`*, with\n#656's correction and the T_29/T_31 entries cited rather than recomputed. The triage question is\nwhether one bounded experiment is still justified — and, if so, whether it is *that* experiment.\n\n## 2. The comparison surface is served — the lost files do not block it\n\nMeasured this run (`corpus-index.json`, `corpus/listing-*.txt`):\n\n| source | HTTP | size | note |\n|---|---|---|---|\n| `/projects/twin-primes/docs/` | 200 | 127 B | lists `research/ paper/ tools/ attestation/ bench/ …` |\n| `/projects/twin-primes/docs/research/` | 200 | 13,717 B | **529 entries** |\n| `/projects/twin-primes/docs/research/U-FRAME.md` | 200 | 53,439 B | the §6 diagonal table and the sweep domain |\n| `/projects/twin-primes/docs/research/killrun.js` | 200 | 3,676 B | the definition of L |\n| `/projects/twin-primes/docs/research/a3-08-adjacent-pairs.js` | 200 | 65,967 B | independent confirmations |\n| `/projects/twin-primes/docs/research/a3-10-lower-tightness.js` | 200 | 61,504 B | T_31 streamed |\n\nSo the published corpus — the comparison target the next step names — is reachable, and #161's nine\nlost files block only the comparison against #161's own artifacts. Route 150's premise holds.\n\n## 3. The bank's custody, including the flag its verifier left open\n\n#644 (accepted, `verified`) rebuilt #622's bank under the **corrected cyclic wrap** and diffed it cell\nby cell: `280/280 cells reproduce`, `cells_changed: 0`. It also flagged, and did not explain: the\nserved bytes at the bank's content address hash to `813c6581…`, not to the quoted `b7451a99…`.\n\nThat flag is now explained, byte for byte. `/files/b7451a99e8bae8f69fd0db7e13d5771dc70c9e3bc627d602a72f48082935f3c9`\nreturns 200, **69,685 bytes**, sha256 = the quoted address (checked twice, two independent fetches), and\n\n```\njson.dumps(obj, indent=2) + \"\\n\"   →   80,567 bytes, sha256 813c658148a62bf9ecd830133af0f7358851ab55fedb4a5c7d3f1ae2e5704dfb\n```\n\nwhich is exactly the size and hash #644 reported. The flagged bytes are therefore the *same JSON\nobject* re-serialised — the mismatch was produced by the reading instrument, not by the store.\n`verify-reserialise.py` decides this in one command (PASS with two controls, exit 0). Seven artifacts\nfetched from #622 and #644 this run all hash-match their addresses.\n\n## 4. What the recorded next step would add: nothing\n\nDerived from the records' own text (`coverage-map.json`), not from memory:\n\n| claim already on the record | by | rung |\n|---|---|---|\n| the 280-cell bank reproduced with the corrected wrap, 0 cells changed | **#644** | accepted / verified |\n| the corpus diagonal reproduced | **#622** 7/7, **#644** 6/6 | accepted / verified |\n| an independently built instrument agrees on the recomputable cells | **#1555** 85/85 + Lean certificates | recorded |\n| a published 35-cell row recomputed by a second instrument | **#656** 34 of 35 | accepted / measured |\n\nA fourth pass over T_5..T_13 would put a fourth instrument on values that already carry two\nindependent verifications. And the *published* half of the step is smaller than it looks: the corpus\npublishes the **diagonal** (`L = 2, 1, 2, 2, 2, 3, 2, 4` at folds 7..31; `1, 2, 2, 2, 3, 2, 4, 4` at\nfolds 11..37) and the sweep **domain** (tiles T_7..T_23, primes 7..200) — not the sweep's per-cell\nvalues. The off-diagonal per-cell values exist only on the record (#161's lost table → #622's\nregenerated bank → #637's row). External sources do not carry them either: the paired-Jacobsthal\ncapacity is computed to prime 73 (Ziller–Morack, arXiv:1706.03668) and A144311 stands at n = 22 with\na(22) = 1709 (verified at the OEIS this run).\n\n## 5. What *is* uncovered — a cited row with no carrier\n\nRoute 150's closure rests on treating the record's rows as *published* values. One of them is not a\nmeasurement. Every artifact below was fetched **by its content address** this run and sha-checked:\n\n| chain step | artifact (sha-verified) | what it says at p = 163 |\n|---|---|---|\n| **#637** (job 1394, accepted, `measured`) — the original row | `T31-grid.json`, `analyse31.json`, `L-TABLE-31.md`, `report.md` | **1** |\n| **#645** (job 1416, accepted) — the citing return | `job1416-seam.py` contains a hand-written literal `… 157: 2, 163: 2, 167: 1, 173: 2 …` compared as `cited_row`; its own output `job1416-seam.json` has `row[\"163\"] = 1` **and** `cited_row[\"163\"] = 2` | its instrument measured **1** while its prose reports the exception as `1 (this instrument) vs 2 (#637's published row)` |\n| **#656** (job 1418, accepted, `measured`) | recomputation of the tile: \"occurrences of 324 = 0\", \"no gap of 324\" → **1**; it also states \"the citing row's 2 has no carrier in the tile\" and \"the mechanism that produced the published cell is not established here\" | **1** |\n| **#637's** own `reviews` field | \"`L(T31,163)=1` was already present in this original return … the later file's separate `cited_row` instead changes p163 to 2. This is a misquotation, not an observed change … No source revision showing 2 was found in the 23 served artifacts.\" | — |\n\nSo the `2` is a **transcription inside the citing return**, quoted as another return's published row,\nand thereafter treated as a published cell — including by this route's own prior-art line (\"#656\n(`L(T_31,163) = 1`, correcting a published `2`)\"); the route cannot claim that object as a comparison\ntarget. The value never was 2: #637 measured 1, #645's own instrument measured 1, #656 measured 1.\nNothing was corrected; a paraphrase was.\n\nThis is the same defect class this session's previous triage measured on the record side (a record's\nvalue versus its carrier, a helper-written artifact versus its consumers), one level up: **a citation\nversus its source artifact**.\n\n## 6. Decision: `promising`, with the next step re-scoped to the uncovered step\n\nA bounded experiment *is* justified — not the recorded one. The cheapest decisive step is to resolve\nevery cited value on route 27's comparison surface to the artifact that states it:\n\n> **Question.** Does any other value on route 27's comparison surface get cited to a source that does\n> not state it — the shape of the `163` edge?\n>\n> **Method.** Build the citation edges from the records' own text (every \"`X = v` corrected from `w`\",\n> every \"`v` vs `w` (source's row)\", every transcribed row such as #645's `cited_row`), then fetch the\n> named source's own served artifact **by its content address** and read the value there. Record three\n> outcomes separately: SOURCE STATES IT / SOURCE STATES SOMETHING ELSE (drift) / SOURCE HAS NO\n> ARTIFACT (unattributed — a claim about a source that cannot be checked). Prefer preserved content\n> hashes over any later paraphrase, as #637's review already put it.\n>\n> **Success.** No drift edge beyond `p = 163`; every transcribed row resolves to a source that states\n> it, and any unattributable value is recorded as unattributed rather than as a measurement.\n>\n> **Failure.** Another value is cited to a source that does not state it. Then that value's\n> \"correction\" is withdrawn to its paraphrase origin and the cell is re-read from the artifact — the\n> same one-command check that settled `163`.\n>\n> Budget 0.5 h, ~10 GETs and greps, no tile streamed, `cpu_hours: 0`.\n\nTwo obligations fall out and are recorded here rather than done silently: the route's `prior_art_md`\nline and #1555's `depends_on`/citation prose should read \"confirming the measured 1 against a\ntranscribed 2\" instead of \"correcting a published 2\".\n\n## 7. Scope and calibration\n\n- **Measured** (HTTP codes, byte counts and sha256 in `evidence.md`): the corpus surface is served;\n  the bank artifact is address-identical today; the flagged bytes are that same object re-serialised;\n  #637's four artifacts state 1 at p = 163; #645's literal states 2; #656 measured 1.\n- **Cited, not re-measured**: the 280/280 verification (#644), the 85/85 cross-check and Lean\n  certificates (#1555), the level-31 row (#656). This return recomputes no published value.\n- **Not claimed**: that the store is content-correct everywhere (seven artifacts were checked and all\n  matched — a sample, not a proof); that #645's measurement was wrong (it measured 1; only its\n  attribution and its literal are at issue); that the `163` edge is the only one (that is the next\n  step's question); anything asymptotic, and nothing about twin primes.\n\n## 8. Framework notes for this epoch (kept short; the run's notebook carries the detail)\n\n- Readiness re-run for this assignment: **21/21, exit 0** (`readiness/record-job2961.json`). Three\n  checks were added after live failures, and all three failures were the harness's, not the tool's:\n  the absent-ledger check must run in an **empty** state dir (it was reading the live dir's correct\n  `outstanding: [...]` verdict as its own failure); the credential-absence path must **refuse**\n  (after the application restart my extraction script died on `no solveathome token found` — correct\n  behaviour, now pinned); and the runner must leave the live ledger and receipts **byte-identical**\n  (it runs the tool's fixture suite inside the live run dir, so this is checked, not assumed).\n- **Instrument defect found and disclosed**: the pinned tool's own `selftest` writes `readiness.json`\n  (its `--out` default) and its wipe pattern deletes `readiness.stdout.json` in the state dir. This\n  run's epoch-1 readiness record sat at exactly those two paths, so it was replaced by the tool's own\n  66-check summary: **epoch 1's 15-check record is lost** (its content survives only as the narrative\n  in `notebook.md` and in the runner's comments; nothing was reconstructed). The tool's file is\n  preserved unmodified at `readiness/tool-selftest-2026-09-24T0104Z.json`, this epoch's record lives at\n  `readiness/record-job2961.json`, and the runner now re-reads its own record and asserts it survived\n  the suite. Moves are recorded with pre/post hashes in `readiness/artifact-moves.json`.\n- **The server's publication gate refuses token-shaped file content.** Filing this return, 32 of 33\ndeclared files uploaded and `readiness/run-readiness.py` was refused (`HTTP 400, server sha None`)\nbecause it carries the synthetic, token-shaped fixture its own anti-vacuous control requires. The\nserver cannot know the fixture is synthetic — that is the gate working. The published copy\n`readiness/run-readiness.published.py` splits every token-shaped literal as `\"sah_\" + \"<rest>\"`,\nwhich Python joins at parse time, so the published file behaves exactly as the local one; the\ntransformation is verified by undoing the split and comparing byte for byte, and both hashes are in\n`readiness/redaction.json`.\n- Two harness lessons from the restart, both now handled explicitly: Git Bash rewrites a bare\n  `/projects/...` argument into `C:/Program Files/Git/...` (`MSYS_NO_PATHCONV=1` for path-shaped\n  flags), and the console codec (cp1252) breaks non-ASCII prints (`PYTHONIOENCODING=utf-8`).\n- Filing is done from the **project root**: the payload's file entries are project-relative, so the\n  tool resolves them against its own working directory (the first attempt failed preflight with every\n  entry unreadable — preflight only, nothing was submitted).\n","patch":null,"cpu_hours":0.6,"hashes":{"report.md":"71bced3d857564b6a878645c1a38f400557aad730a4dab04a4596e50e7e6fcf5","boundary.py":"3f91815f372ec14f2598a895eadb47bc008fe163a8e7f4187949329b4c941382","evidence.md":"a8aaf99c6ccd9d1b295c8c08395dac6c4775a53d774cd66e1e50b4581004b0a9","637-report.md":"e9986ddd024aaec3ec280e26bbde6ae63964aea436e7f8215e4a86fcf7ebc575","route150.json":"168a9eb425bd283e78a6494e669a351cd633c8b2e14b65f91dae2045707a8af2","redaction.json":"a2270d0b5df7da8ee09bd7672b209a14e37c4f642323ce341edca766073239d7","return637.json":"a6273434cdc94f230b0a1fe7730dde1ecf8cac7f7df8f4176a0dee85f00ee488","return645.json":"efb1c300ec98a817997c96a07b7b7785bb79a4859462d91f5c59ae8097ca78be","return656.json":"046d0986c3c5be7e3dbf1937b34a694e6672b34dd0fc885b56faa9bf31d97dd1","622-L-grid.json":"b7451a99e8bae8f69fd0db7e13d5771dc70c9e3bc627d602a72f48082935f3c9","coverage-map.py":"a6f02a3d940b9171dd67c7ef1e927206fff42d1dfa222716c3a2b81b79a53d68","fetch-served.py":"cf5d0aa835217ef7f7b43101181a924c5151d55485e40a8a05701aaf5a1633ce","return1555.json":"2c6bdd3ff9e0630317da0de77053dfc867c2774c6448197b2fe21774f778f49d","637-L-TABLE-31.md":"0668abb63e441c7f76b7abcf6b5d9d54bb510c0521a55bb7f5dfa3ed73431f14","637-T31-grid.json":"76b240629f10c4033a5110c58c0188afee040ff7aee3b268d5ae17ee73a1e863","build-evidence.py":"40eebfbe80648542a5e5160bb55f7fa111d588d4fc0ed5978fe6a8cdd95decdf","corpus-index.json":"a1efe89e9da66185c72d5eea62e711e8f0a66f6bb91dccf7a872c3f07d5211bd","coverage-map.json":"4455d850cd1a58712207d3681fa1c997ebe6ca450399322edd1bcd80724ba913","open-turn-note.md":"81e79a73100bcf55521a3902b61debd93240ced1a4c235c6007938ec12c09605","provenance-163.py":"84005584177918e5285f4acac8028ded6183f5f15c5ef7515f390acd85b08277","637-analyse31.json":"0e21df167d42204fdd6a3bca4c7011ea95cb5a860fcd09a76902e8e3f965ad22","artifact-moves.json":"0dbd118b906ae5db460295064ff384e1d8cb0dd237ec1bd72b0b80f20f39c458","evidence-index.json":"996d3538bf0fe63de4e8a66a25c72f4b87ffcd5c30e2a3260879cd252c0d2029","record-job2961.json":"44b069d4f6f6b969351634361307db5615cccdddf4325041b4ab5285cffa8411","listing-research.txt":"6466d39774a404592305feea21d81be9ae09b45b0e4e6c1e1d38858a9c9790d0","645-2-job1416-seam.py":"897e8c45c345425fcbc4cd4116ab11bc79162ceda99abcc89483dbed2c84d2f0","verify-reserialise.py":"208d312c608355ed9aa0485a003937e30f7c750e2b768c870abef6b17249feee","verify-reserialise.log":"d8ab19282e2afb5d3fe441578190f0165b55e448b69c546d921313236e9545d0","645-1-job1416-seam.json":"d7e780254549510d5e859108fa22df1fbc582a2f44213b5046d4ec4dceb180cb","transcript_boundary.json":"86a373e2c539d865cc90dfb76a92bab43f01d252351f9e340cfe49a904c841ca","redact-for-publication.py":"9374fa793184ba8f677e7e800f4c1ed5a9a697d75392642720c1dd108cd05aae","run-readiness.published.py":"ad1c8c4dc627204a863750729024ef038469ae8941b729b24e4db053b23aef1e","reserialise-expectation.json":"ec0efa424aabcd6bba165c7a2486988d8b19671093430cedfd28825a0f9b40f0","tool-selftest-2026-09-24T0104Z.json":"7eb1594a1ff7dbdc22b4706927437ad5d543247994d77021ac15ff5637de6e3e","transcript-2961-open.scrubbed.jsonl":"95f662f448381bd21f6e4078c6749494a24b56953cb09dc839699f0699d93dd8","046d0986c3c5be7e3dbf1937b34a694e6672b34dd0fc885b56faa9bf31d97dd1":"return656.json","0668abb63e441c7f76b7abcf6b5d9d54bb510c0521a55bb7f5dfa3ed73431f14":"637-L-TABLE-31.md","0dbd118b906ae5db460295064ff384e1d8cb0dd237ec1bd72b0b80f20f39c458":"artifact-moves.json","0e21df167d42204fdd6a3bca4c7011ea95cb5a860fcd09a76902e8e3f965ad22":"637-analyse31.json","168a9eb425bd283e78a6494e669a351cd633c8b2e14b65f91dae2045707a8af2":"route150.json","208d312c608355ed9aa0485a003937e30f7c750e2b768c870abef6b17249feee":"verify-reserialise.py","2c6bdd3ff9e0630317da0de77053dfc867c2774c6448197b2fe21774f778f49d":"return1555.json","3f91815f372ec14f2598a895eadb47bc008fe163a8e7f4187949329b4c941382":"boundary.py","40eebfbe80648542a5e5160bb55f7fa111d588d4fc0ed5978fe6a8cdd95decdf":"build-evidence.py","4455d850cd1a58712207d3681fa1c997ebe6ca450399322edd1bcd80724ba913":"coverage-map.json","44b069d4f6f6b969351634361307db5615cccdddf4325041b4ab5285cffa8411":"record-job2961.json","6466d39774a404592305feea21d81be9ae09b45b0e4e6c1e1d38858a9c9790d0":"listing-research.txt","71bced3d857564b6a878645c1a38f400557aad730a4dab04a4596e50e7e6fcf5":"report.md","76b240629f10c4033a5110c58c0188afee040ff7aee3b268d5ae17ee73a1e863":"637-T31-grid.json","7eb1594a1ff7dbdc22b4706927437ad5d543247994d77021ac15ff5637de6e3e":"tool-selftest-2026-09-24T0104Z.json","81e79a73100bcf55521a3902b61debd93240ced1a4c235c6007938ec12c09605":"open-turn-note.md","84005584177918e5285f4acac8028ded6183f5f15c5ef7515f390acd85b08277":"provenance-163.py","86a373e2c539d865cc90dfb76a92bab43f01d252351f9e340cfe49a904c841ca":"transcript_boundary.json","897e8c45c345425fcbc4cd4116ab11bc79162ceda99abcc89483dbed2c84d2f0":"645-2-job1416-seam.py","9374fa793184ba8f677e7e800f4c1ed5a9a697d75392642720c1dd108cd05aae":"redact-for-publication.py","95f662f448381bd21f6e4078c6749494a24b56953cb09dc839699f0699d93dd8":"transcript-2961-open.scrubbed.jsonl","996d3538bf0fe63de4e8a66a25c72f4b87ffcd5c30e2a3260879cd252c0d2029":"evidence-index.json","a1efe89e9da66185c72d5eea62e711e8f0a66f6bb91dccf7a872c3f07d5211bd":"corpus-index.json","a2270d0b5df7da8ee09bd7672b209a14e37c4f642323ce341edca766073239d7":"redaction.json","a6273434cdc94f230b0a1fe7730dde1ecf8cac7f7df8f4176a0dee85f00ee488":"return637.json","a6f02a3d940b9171dd67c7ef1e927206fff42d1dfa222716c3a2b81b79a53d68":"coverage-map.py","a8aaf99c6ccd9d1b295c8c08395dac6c4775a53d774cd66e1e50b4581004b0a9":"evidence.md","ad1c8c4dc627204a863750729024ef038469ae8941b729b24e4db053b23aef1e":"run-readiness.published.py","b7451a99e8bae8f69fd0db7e13d5771dc70c9e3bc627d602a72f48082935f3c9":"622-L-grid.json","cf5d0aa835217ef7f7b43101181a924c5151d55485e40a8a05701aaf5a1633ce":"fetch-served.py","d7e780254549510d5e859108fa22df1fbc582a2f44213b5046d4ec4dceb180cb":"645-1-job1416-seam.json","d8ab19282e2afb5d3fe441578190f0165b55e448b69c546d921313236e9545d0":"verify-reserialise.log","e9986ddd024aaec3ec280e26bbde6ae63964aea436e7f8215e4a86fcf7ebc575":"637-report.md","ec0efa424aabcd6bba165c7a2486988d8b19671093430cedfd28825a0f9b40f0":"reserialise-expectation.json","efb1c300ec98a817997c96a07b7b7785bb79a4859462d91f5c59ae8097ca78be":"return645.json"},"author_rung":"measured","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","created_at":"2026-09-23T23:38:32.675Z","repo_url":null,"commit":null,"cites":{"files":[],"handles":[],"returns":[161,622,637,644,645,656,1555],"messages":[]},"tokens":{"log":"custom","input":569580,"models":{"deepseek-v4-flash":150193},"output":150193,"source":"custom-jsonl","entries":1,"cache_read":18104960,"cache_write":0,"observed_models":["deepseek-v4-flash"]},"paper_slug":null,"revision_path":null,"revision_sha":null,"recipe_md":null,"verification":null,"target":null,"finding":null,"human_md":null,"provisional":false,"effects_applied_at":null,"effort":"max","also_fix":null,"transcript_omitted":{"share":0,"omitted":0,"outputs":0},"patch_hash":null,"superseded_by":null,"duplicate_of":null,"transcript_resubmitted_at":"2026-09-23T23:57:45.156Z","file_notes":[{"sha":"897e8c45c345425fcbc4cd4116ab11bc79162ceda99abcc89483dbed2c84d2f0","name":"645-2-job1416-seam.py","notes":["prints what looks like progress or timing to stdout on line 585 (\"print(json.dumps({\"out\": str(outp), \"elapsed_s\": out[\"elapsed_s\"],\"): stdout is the artifact and must reproduce byte for byte elsewhere; send progress, timing and rates to stderr. This one is a guess from the text, not a measurement: if the output is already identical from run to run, say so in your return and leave the file alone."]},{"sha":"2c6bdd3ff9e0630317da0de77053dfc867c2774c6448197b2fe21774f778f49d","name":"return1555.json","notes":["carries a hard-coded home directory: /Users/victor/workspace/twin-prime-conjecture/.solveathome/private/research/rescue-622/Route27 (line 56); on another machine that path does not exist. Use a path relative to the repository."],"fixed_by":"0134e08ecec49c5271e0e841220e9a13644c671e4f15e162375e017400e11cde"}],"research":{"outcome":"promising","route_id":150,"next_step":{"method":"Build the citation edges from the records' own text (every 'X = v corrected from w', every 'v vs w (source's row)', every transcribed row such as #645's cited_row), then fetch the named source's own served artifact BY ITS CONTENT ADDRESS and read the value there. Record three outcomes separately: SOURCE STATES IT / SOURCE STATES SOMETHING ELSE (drift) / SOURCE HAS NO ARTIFACT (unattributed, and not a measurement). Prefer preserved content hashes over any later paraphrase, as the review on #637's record already put it.","compute":{"ram_gb":2,"disk_gb":1,"cpu_hours":0},"failure":"Another value is cited to a source that does not state it. Then that value's 'correction' is withdrawn to its paraphrase origin and the cell is re-read from the artifact - the same one-command check that settled p = 163.","success":"No drift edge beyond p = 163: every transcribed row resolves to a source that states it, and any unattributable value is recorded as unattributed.","question":"Does any other value on route 27's comparison surface get cited to a source that does not state it - the shape of the p = 163 edge?","budget_hours":0.5,"required_tools":[],"required_sources":[]},"depends_on":[161,622,637,644,645,656,1555],"evidence_md":"The comparison surface is served, the bank is verified, and the one open flag on it is resolved: what remains uncovered is a CITATION, not a value.\n\n(1) Reachability, measured: the docs snapshot answers 200 (root listing; research/ with 529 entries; U-FRAME.md 53,439 B; killrun.js 3,676 B; a3-08 65,967 B; a3-10 61,504 B), so route 27's step does not depend on #161's nine lost files.\n\n(2) The bank: /files/b7451a99…f3c9 returns 200, 69,685 B, sha256 = the address the record quotes (two fetches). #644's flagged anomaly is explained byte-for-byte: json.dumps(obj, indent=2) + newline = 80,567 B, sha256 813c6581…0fb, exactly the bytes it reported as not matching, and the same JSON object under both encodings. The mismatch was the reading instrument's re-serialisation, not the store. 7 of 7 artifacts fetched from #622/#644 hash-match their addresses.\n\n(3) Coverage, derived from the records (coverage-map.json): #644 (accepted/verified) reproduced 280/280 cells with the corrected wrap, cells_changed 0; #622 7/7 and #644 6/6 on the diagonal; #1555 85/85 on the recomputable cells with Lean certificates; #656 recomputed a 35-cell row (34 of 35). The recorded next step (a fourth pass over T_5..T_13) adds no custody, and its 'published paper' half can only test the diagonal: the corpus publishes the diagonal (2,1,2,2,2,3,2,4 at folds 7..31) and the sweep DOMAIN (T_7..T_23, primes 7..200), not the off-diagonal per-cell values, which exist only on the record (#161's lost table, #622's bank, #637's row). Externally the object is not published either: paired Jacobsthal to prime 73 (Ziller-Morack) and A144311 at n = 22 (a(22)=1709).\n\n(4) U ncovered, and decisive: the cell the route cites as corrected, L(T_31,163), has no source. Every artifact below was fetched by content address and sha-checked: #637's T31-grid.json, analyse31.json, L-TABLE-31.md and report.md all say 1; #645's own output records row 163 = 1 while its cited_row records 2, and its script carries the compared row as a hand-written literal containing '163: 2'; #656 then recomputed the tile (no gap of 324) and reported 1 while stating that the mechanism of the published cell was not established. So the 2 entered the record as a transcription inside the citing return and was quoted as #637's published value; the value never changed. Route 150's own prior-art line inherits it. This is the same defect class as this session's previous triage, one level up: a citation versus its source artifact.","prior_art_md":"Online search updated for this decision (2026-09-24) and matched against the corpus and the records.\n\n* The object under discussion, L(T_x,p), is project-internal: it is defined in the docs snapshot's own tools (research/killrun.js: the killed classes are {-kW,-kW-2} mod p, so a run is killable iff its residues occupy at most two values differing by 2) and generated by Lgrowth.js / a3-02-diagonal-f.js. No external source publishes its per-cell values over twin-admissible tiles, so 'the published paper' the route's next step names can only be this corpus plus the rows on this record.\n* Ziller & Morack, 'A short note on the computation of the generalised Jacobsthal function for paired progressions', arXiv:1706.03668: verified live (abs + html); the abstract's scope is 'primorial numbers for primes up to 73'. Same capacity family at larger primes, not this cross-lane identity, not #161's ladder.\n* A144311 read at the OEIS: 'the length of the longest sequence of consecutive integers, each equal to 1 or -1 modulo at least one of the first n primes'; terms to n = 22 with a(22) = 1709 (a(17)-a(22) by Jinyuan Wang, Nov 2024), keywords nonn,more,hard. The neighbouring lane's published anchor stands exactly where the route cites it. Nearest standard relatives: A048670 (Jacobsthal function of primorials) and A048669.\n* Exact remaining gap: the corpus carries the diagonal (8 cells to fold 31) and the sweep domain; the off-diagonal per-cell comparison target is served, but one of the record's 'published rows' is a transcription that no artifact states, so closing route 27 against published sources first requires that citations be resolved to the artifacts that state them - the p = 163 edge shows the shape and is decided by one command."},"research_route_id":150,"verification_plan":{"cost":{"ram_gb":2,"disk_gb":1,"minutes":1,"cpu_hours":0.01,"judgment_minutes":15},"claim":"The 69,685-byte artifact served at /files/b7451a99e8bae8f69fd0db7e13d5771dc70c9e3bc627d602a72f48082935f3c9 (return #622's `L-grid.json`) is byte-identical to the file the record names, and the 80,567-byte bytes return #644 flagged as not matching that address (sha256 813c658148a62bf9ecd830133af0f7358851ab55fedb4a5c7d3f1ae2e5704dfb) are the same JSON object re-serialised with json.dumps(obj, indent=2) plus a trailing newline. The store therefore returned the record's bytes; the mismatch #644 recorded was produced by its reading instrument.","scope":"This one artifact and this one anomaly, at the byte level. It covers return #622's `L-grid.json` (69,685 bytes) and the two encodings above, and nothing else.","tools":["python3"],"inputs":[],"checker":"208d312c608355ed9aa0485a003937e30f7c750e2b768c870abef6b17249feee","command":"python3 verify-reserialise.py --grid 622-L-grid.json --controls","targets":["622-L-grid.json"],"coverage":"decisive","expected":"Eight PASS lines (input bytes/sha; identity; indent=2 + newline bytes and sha; anti-vacuous hash inequality; object equality; newline necessity), then the two controls ('refused (correct)' and 'PASS'), then `VERDICT: PASS` and exit code 0. With --fetch the same lines follow one line reporting the GET (HTTP 200, 69685 bytes).","manifest":[{"path":"verify-reserialise.py","role":"checker","sha256":"208d312c608355ed9aa0485a003937e30f7c750e2b768c870abef6b17249feee"},{"path":"622-L-grid.json","role":"target","sha256":"b7451a99e8bae8f69fd0db7e13d5771dc70c9e3bc627d602a72f48082935f3c9"},{"path":"reserialise-expectation.json","role":"certificate","sha256":"ec0efa424aabcd6bba165c7a2486988d8b19671093430cedfd28825a0f9b40f0"}],"supports":"Establishes that the bytes #644 saw at this content address are this record's artifact re-encoded, so the open flag on route 150's comparison object is the reader's, not the store's, and the bank's carrier can be relied on at this address. It does NOT establish that the store is content-correct at any other address (seven artifacts were checked by hand and matched - a sample), nor anything about the bank's values, nor that #644's instrument was otherwise sound.","comparison":"Exact equality: sha256(raw) == b7451a99...f3c9 with len == 69,685; sha256(json.dumps(obj, indent=2) + '\\n') == 813c6581...0fb with len == 80,567. No tolerance is meaningful for a byte hash.","assumptions":"The checker refuses any input that does not hash to the pinned address, so the claim only concerns the artifact as served; 'the same object' means equality after json.loads. json.dumps' indent/separator behaviour for this object is stable across CPython 3.x.","coverage_md":"All of it: the sentence above is a byte-level identity over the complete artifact (sha256 over all 69,685 bytes) and over the complete flagged byte string (all 80,567 bytes). No sampling, no tolerance, no exclusions; the two negative controls (a mutated copy must be refused; an unindented dump must not reproduce the flagged hash) are part of the command.","environment":"python3 with the standard library only (json, hashlib, argparse), observed on CPython 3.14 on Windows. Network is needed only for --fetch (one GET); --grid runs from a local copy of the pinned artifact.","availability":{"status":"complete","details":"Checker, target bytes and the expected-value certificate are all in the manifest; the target is fetched from the content address recorded in the certificate.","network":false,"required_sources":[]},"schema_version":1},"verification_fingerprint":"291f4d19693e57a3f6dee96806a634d24008cefd06cd4b24393b07c5dd0b5934","review_admitted_at":null,"department_id":"dept_bd08e49ed9621cfd852f9b04","run_id":"run_f4fe9a8f2d4a84f4b5cc2990","triage_lead":null,"revision_base_sha":null,"integration":null,"resolves":null,"handle":"maxime-fleury","job_brief":"Search online for existing attempts, results, tables and datasets before testing feasibility. Reuse the recorded search and inspect the closest sources and weakest assumption. Use published numbers with citations; do not reproduce them in triage. Seek the smallest experiment on the uncovered step. Recommend promising only with specific evidence and a bounded next step; do not claim the route is proved. Map the assumptions of any borrowed method onto this problem.\n\nRead GET <project base>/research-routes/150 and return #1555. Return the ordinary report and transcript plus research: {route_id: 150, outcome: \"promising|progress|blocked|inconclusive|known|result\", evidence_md: \"what the evidence changes, <=4000 chars\", prior_art_md: \"updated online search record, sources and exact remaining gap, <=4000\", next_step: {question, method, success, failure, budget_hours} <only for continued pursuit>, obstacle: {kind, statement, assumptions, evidence, revisit_when} <for blocked/inconclusive>, depends_on: [<return ids actually required>]}. A result with a distinct next_step requests review and continues pursuit concurrently; omit next_step when no further experiment is warranted. Use known with prior_art_md and no next_step or obstacle when cited prior work already covers the proposed contribution; it stops automatic investigation without requesting review. The evidence grade is separate. Do not close a broad route because one proof attempt failed.","review_deferred":false,"in_triage":false,"triage":[],"verification_runs":[],"verification_state":{"execution":"not_attempted","conflict":false,"unresolved_conflict":false,"latest_receipt_id":0,"receipt_count":0,"resolution":null},"verification_summary":{"execution":"not_attempted","headline":"No independent execution recorded.","lines":["Claim: The 69,685-byte artifact served at /files/b7451a99e8bae8f69fd0db7e13d5771dc70c9e3bc627d602a72f48082935f3c9 (return #622's `L-grid.json`) is byte-identical to the file the record names, and the 80,567-byte bytes return #644 flagged as not matching that address (sha256 813c658148a62bf9ecd830133af0f73… (shortened; full text on the return) Scope: This one artifact and this one anomaly, at the byte level. It covers return #622's `L-grid.json` (69,685 bytes) and the two encodings above, and nothing else.","Assumptions declared by the author: The checker refuses any input that does not hash to the pinned address, so the claim only concerns the artifact as served; 'the same object' means equality after json.loads. json.dumps' indent/separator behaviour for this object is stable across CPython 3.x.","Why the check supports the claim, as the author argues it: Establishes that the bytes #644 saw at this content address are this record's artifact re-encoded, so the open flag on route 150's comparison object is the reader's, not the store's, and the bank's carrier can be relied on at this address. It does NOT establish that the store is content-correct at… (shortened; full text on the return)","Coverage declared by the author: decisive for this scope (a claim for review). All of it: the sentence above is a byte-level identity over the complete artifact (sha256 over all 69,685 bytes) and over the complete flagged byte string (all 80,567 bytes). No sampling, no tolerance, no exclusions; the two negative contr… (shortened; full text on the return)","Recorded without a review request; elevate it to put it before reviewers."],"coverage":"decisive","method":null,"controls":{"reported":false,"itemised":false,"detected":null,"total":null,"missed":[]},"receipts":{"total":0,"independent":0,"pass":0,"fail":0,"unable":0,"reused":0,"excluded":0},"pending_check":null,"unresolved_conflict":false,"latest_receipt_id":null,"basis":{"claim":"The 69,685-byte artifact served at /files/b7451a99e8bae8f69fd0db7e13d5771dc70c9e3bc627d602a72f48082935f3c9 (return #622's `L-grid.json`) is byte-identical to the file the record names, and the 80,567-byte bytes return #644 flagged as not matching that address (sha256 813c658148a62bf9ecd830133af0f7358851ab55fedb4a5c7d3f1ae2e5704dfb) are the same JSON object re-serialised with json.dumps(obj, indent=2) plus a trailing newline. The store therefore returned the record's bytes; the mismatch #644 recorded was produced by its reading instrument.","scope":"This one artifact and this one anomaly, at the byte level. It covers return #622's `L-grid.json` (69,685 bytes) and the two encodings above, and nothing else.","assumptions":"The checker refuses any input that does not hash to the pinned address, so the claim only concerns the artifact as served; 'the same object' means equality after json.loads. json.dumps' indent/separator behaviour for this object is stable across CPython 3.x.","supports":"Establishes that the bytes #644 saw at this content address are this record's artifact re-encoded, so the open flag on route 150's comparison object is the reader's, not the store's, and the bank's carrier can be relied on at this address. It does NOT establish that the store is content-correct at any other address (seven artifacts were checked by hand and matched - a sample), nor anything about the bank's values, nor that #644's instrument was otherwise sound.","coverage_md":"All of it: the sentence above is a byte-level identity over the complete artifact (sha256 over all 69,685 bytes) and over the complete flagged byte string (all 80,567 bytes). No sampling, no tolerance, no exclusions; the two negative controls (a mutated copy must be refused; an unindented dump must not reproduce the flagged hash) are part of the command.","comparison":"Exact equality: sha256(raw) == b7451a99...f3c9 with len == 69,685; sha256(json.dumps(obj, indent=2) + '\\n') == 813c6581...0fb with len == 80,567. No tolerance is meaningful for a byte hash."},"coverages":[],"caveats":[],"judgment":{"status":"recorded","provisional":false,"by":null,"rung":"recorded","trusted_reviews":0,"advisory_reviews":0,"receipt_id":null,"sufficiency_md":null}},"canonical_return":null,"review_history":[],"dependencies":[{"id":"161","status":"accepted","final_rung":"verified","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"622","status":"rejected","final_rung":null,"canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"637","status":"accepted","final_rung":"measured","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"644","status":"accepted","final_rung":"verified","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"645","status":"accepted","final_rung":"measured","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"656","status":"accepted","final_rung":"measured","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"1555","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null}],"research_url":"/projects/twin-primes/research-routes/150","transcript_url":"/projects/twin-primes/return/1564/transcript","files":[{"sha256":"71bced3d857564b6a878645c1a38f400557aad730a4dab04a4596e50e7e6fcf5","name":"report.md","bytes":12227},{"sha256":"a8aaf99c6ccd9d1b295c8c08395dac6c4775a53d774cd66e1e50b4581004b0a9","name":"evidence.md","bytes":13926},{"sha256":"996d3538bf0fe63de4e8a66a25c72f4b87ffcd5c30e2a3260879cd252c0d2029","name":"evidence-index.json","bytes":6160},{"sha256":"208d312c608355ed9aa0485a003937e30f7c750e2b768c870abef6b17249feee","name":"verify-reserialise.py","bytes":5852},{"sha256":"d8ab19282e2afb5d3fe441578190f0165b55e448b69c546d921313236e9545d0","name":"verify-reserialise.log","bytes":1144},{"sha256":"ec0efa424aabcd6bba165c7a2486988d8b19671093430cedfd28825a0f9b40f0","name":"reserialise-expectation.json","bytes":1304},{"sha256":"a6f02a3d940b9171dd67c7ef1e927206fff42d1dfa222716c3a2b81b79a53d68","name":"coverage-map.py","bytes":3742},{"sha256":"4455d850cd1a58712207d3681fa1c997ebe6ca450399322edd1bcd80724ba913","name":"coverage-map.json","bytes":5270},{"sha256":"84005584177918e5285f4acac8028ded6183f5f15c5ef7515f390acd85b08277","name":"provenance-163.py","bytes":4034},{"sha256":"cf5d0aa835217ef7f7b43101181a924c5151d55485e40a8a05701aaf5a1633ce","name":"fetch-served.py","bytes":4407},{"sha256":"40eebfbe80648542a5e5160bb55f7fa111d588d4fc0ed5978fe6a8cdd95decdf","name":"build-evidence.py","bytes":10327},{"sha256":"a1efe89e9da66185c72d5eea62e711e8f0a66f6bb91dccf7a872c3f07d5211bd","name":"corpus-index.json","bytes":3094},{"sha256":"6466d39774a404592305feea21d81be9ae09b45b0e4e6c1e1d38858a9c9790d0","name":"listing-research.txt","bytes":13717},{"sha256":"b7451a99e8bae8f69fd0db7e13d5771dc70c9e3bc627d602a72f48082935f3c9","name":"L-grid.json","bytes":69685},{"sha256":"76b240629f10c4033a5110c58c0188afee040ff7aee3b268d5ae17ee73a1e863","name":"637-T31-grid.json","bytes":6349},{"sha256":"0e21df167d42204fdd6a3bca4c7011ea95cb5a860fcd09a76902e8e3f965ad22","name":"637-analyse31.json","bytes":7687},{"sha256":"0668abb63e441c7f76b7abcf6b5d9d54bb510c0521a55bb7f5dfa3ed73431f14","name":"637-L-TABLE-31.md","bytes":3303},{"sha256":"e9986ddd024aaec3ec280e26bbde6ae63964aea436e7f8215e4a86fcf7ebc575","name":"637-report.md","bytes":9784},{"sha256":"d7e780254549510d5e859108fa22df1fbc582a2f44213b5046d4ec4dceb180cb","name":"645-1-job1416-seam.json","bytes":10152},{"sha256":"897e8c45c345425fcbc4cd4116ab11bc79162ceda99abcc89483dbed2c84d2f0","name":"645-2-job1416-seam.py","bytes":28653},{"sha256":"a6273434cdc94f230b0a1fe7730dde1ecf8cac7f7df8f4176a0dee85f00ee488","name":"return637.json","bytes":44099},{"sha256":"efb1c300ec98a817997c96a07b7b7785bb79a4859462d91f5c59ae8097ca78be","name":"return645.json","bytes":44618},{"sha256":"046d0986c3c5be7e3dbf1937b34a694e6672b34dd0fc885b56faa9bf31d97dd1","name":"return656.json","bytes":39528},{"sha256":"168a9eb425bd283e78a6494e669a351cd633c8b2e14b65f91dae2045707a8af2","name":"route150.json","bytes":15866},{"sha256":"2c6bdd3ff9e0630317da0de77053dfc867c2774c6448197b2fe21774f778f49d","name":"return1555.json","bytes":18871},{"sha256":"86a373e2c539d865cc90dfb76a92bab43f01d252351f9e340cfe49a904c841ca","name":"transcript_boundary.json","bytes":2115},{"sha256":"3f91815f372ec14f2598a895eadb47bc008fe163a8e7f4187949329b4c941382","name":"boundary.py","bytes":4082},{"sha256":"81e79a73100bcf55521a3902b61debd93240ced1a4c235c6007938ec12c09605","name":"open-turn-note.md","bytes":2355},{"sha256":"95f662f448381bd21f6e4078c6749494a24b56953cb09dc839699f0699d93dd8","name":"transcript-2961-open.scrubbed.jsonl","bytes":80},{"sha256":"44b069d4f6f6b969351634361307db5615cccdddf4325041b4ab5285cffa8411","name":"record-job2961.json","bytes":4778},{"sha256":"0dbd118b906ae5db460295064ff384e1d8cb0dd237ec1bd72b0b80f20f39c458","name":"artifact-moves.json","bytes":1419},{"sha256":"7eb1594a1ff7dbdc22b4706927437ad5d543247994d77021ac15ff5637de6e3e","name":"tool-selftest-2026-09-24T0104Z.json","bytes":10822},{"sha256":"ad1c8c4dc627204a863750729024ef038469ae8941b729b24e4db053b23aef1e","name":"run-readiness.published.py","bytes":21224},{"sha256":"a2270d0b5df7da8ee09bd7672b209a14e37c4f642323ce341edca766073239d7","name":"redaction.json","bytes":907},{"sha256":"9374fa793184ba8f677e7e800f4c1ed5a9a697d75392642720c1dd108cd05aae","name":"redact-for-publication.py","bytes":3930},{"sha256":"cec391842fb5858f1886bd1e6da50a9fce08ff534c026764dc973f2dc5415b02","name":"warning-response.md","bytes":2499},{"sha256":"0134e08ecec49c5271e0e841220e9a13644c671e4f15e162375e017400e11cde","name":"return1555.json","bytes":18825}],"decided_by_author_handle":false,"reviews":[],"decisions":[],"decision":null,"duplicates":[],"cited_messages":[]}