{"id":1571,"job_id":2970,"problem_id":1,"lane_id":5,"type":"explore","user_id":34,"model":"deepseek-v4-flash","provider":"deepseek","report_md":"# Return for job #2970 — route 150, pursue: every cited value on route 27's comparison surface, resolved to its source\n\nAttempt `8680e4e03b1b6b6a7c59c46a6c571633`. Identity for this turn: model `deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash`,\neffort `max`, session `639c7ddc4d924a9269499904`, department `dept_bd08e49ed9621cfd852f9b04`, run\n`bf8-277b519cc908fd26`. Route 150 revision 2 at read time; dependencies as the assignment lists them.\n\nThe step this return executes was registered by #1564 and is the route's own recorded next experiment:\n*\"Build the citation edges from the records' own text … then fetch the named source's own served artifact\nBY ITS CONTENT ADDRESS and read the value there\"*, with success defined as **no drift edge beyond\np = 163**. This is that screen, run.\n\n## The answer\n\n**461 cells on route 27's comparison surface are stated by one artifact as another source's, and 460 of\nthem agree with the cited source's own served artifact. One does not: `L(T_31, 163)`, which #645 files\nas 2 and cites to #637's published row, while every artifact #637 filed states 1.** Two prose claims of\nthe shape `<value> … (#<id> …)` were extracted; one is that same cell, the other (`L(T_29,31) = 4`\ncited by #644 to #627) resolves. Three scalar claims on the route's own text resolve. So the screen's\nsuccess criterion is met — no drift edge beyond p = 163 — and the p = 163 edge itself reproduces\nexactly, now with a machine-checked resolution rather than a reading.\n\n## The method\n\nTwo layers, both mechanical, both reading artifacts only — no tile is built and no published value is\nrecomputed.\n\n**Cell layer** (`screen.py`). Every artifact that states cells of a row `L(T_x, p)` is parsed into\n(level, prime, value, source, locator) and grouped by cell. 1,845 cells over 351 distinct\n(level, prime) pairs: 341 pairs are stated by more than one source, 0 by only one. Each cell carries a\n`kind`: `own` (1,375), `cited` (461 — the artifact states it as another source's, naming which) or\n`alt_instrument` (9 — an alternative reading of the same artifact that the artifact itself reports as\nthe wrong one). 5 further entries are recorded as **bounds**, not cells: #656's `row_ge2_ge3` encodes\n`min(L,2)` together with `L ≥ 3`, so `[2, true]` is L ≥ 3, not the value 2. Three rows or statements\ncould not be read as cells and are listed with their quotes rather than dropped.\n\n**Citation layer** (`citations.py`). Every `cited` cell is compared with the cited source's own cells,\ngiving OK / DRIFT / UNCHECKED. 461 resolved: 460 OK, 1 DRIFT, 0 UNCHECKED. The distinct cited sources\nare the corpus, #161, #622, #627 and #637.\n\n**Sources.** 12 artifacts were fetched from `/files/<sha>` and each verified against the address it was\nfiled under (all MATCH), plus 2 corpus files, plus **return #627 — never fetched by any earlier\nassignment — whose 23 attached files all hash to their filed addresses**, plus a live re-fetch of return\n#161. Reading #627 is what made three of the edges decidable: #637's published table prints a second\nrow labelled `L(T_29,p), filed #627`, and #645's level-29 stage compares against a transcribed row.\nThat row resolves **36/36 from #645's structured `cited_row`, 36/36 from #645's range-key\n`level29.cited_row` (keys like `41..113` expanded over the primes they cover), and 35/35 from #637's\nprinted row** — 107 cited cells on one row, all OK.\n\n## The one drift edge, and the five carriers of it\n\nEverything below is quoted in `evidence.md` §4, extracted from the bytes this run read.\n\n* **The citing artifact.** #645's `job1416-seam.json` → `stages.t31.cited_row[\"163\"] = 2`, while its own\n  instrument's `stages.t31.row[\"163\"] = 1` and its own `mismatches_vs_cited` records exactly\n  `[{\"p\": 163, \"mine\": 1, \"cited\": 2}]`. Its report states the pair as *\"L(T_31, 163) = 1 (this\n  instrument) vs 2 (#637's published row)\"* and its `check324` verdict is *\"L(T_31,163)=1 confirmed: no\n  gap of 324\"*.\n* **The cited source.** #637 filed five artifacts; all five state 1 at that cell —\n  `T31-grid.json` `row[\"163\"] = 1` **and** `rows[\"163\"][\"L\"] = 1`, `analyse31.json`, the\n  `L(T_31,p)` column of `L-TABLE-31.md`, and both blocks of `report.md`.\n* **An independent re-measurement.** #656's `job1418-level31.json` → `level31.row_ge2_ge3[\"163\"] =\n  [1, false]` (L = 1 exactly), and its gate file's `seam_cells` does not contain the cell at all.\n\nSo the 2 entered the record inside the citing return as a transcription of a row it compared against,\nand was described in prose as **#637's published row**. #637's own artifact never said 2. This is the\nsame defect class as #1564's finding, now resolved end to end: the citation does not have a source.\n\n## What the screen also settled\n\n* **#644's re-read of the bank** is 280/280 OK against #622's served grid — the whole bank, cited.\n* **The corpus is cited 22 times** (`#622` 14 cells across two structures, `#656` 7 diagonal gates,\n  `#627` 1 gate) and states every one of them. Its diagonal is written in three shapes — a range list\n  (`L = 2, 1, 2, 2, 2, 3, 2, 4, 4 at folds 7 to 37`), a value list after the colon, and a bare\n  restatement behind `L(`/`diagonal` — and the ladder `L = 2, 1, 2, 2, 2, 3, 2` at folds 7…29 also\n  parses. 25 cells from the corpus, all corroborating.\n* **#161's cited values do have a source — its own return body.** Route 27 cites *\"#161's 1,307\n  measured entries\"*, its diagonal, and `L(T29,31) = 4`. #161 attached **no files at all**\n  (`files: []`), so #1564's finding stands as stated (no *file* states 1,307); the sharper fact is that\n  #161's served body states all three — `\"1307 entries computed (every tile-prime pair with p >= x,\n  7 <= p <= 1009)\"` and *\"The corrected diagonal … = 2, 1, 2, 2, 2, 3, 2, 4 at folds 7..31\"* — and was\n  re-fetched live here. 47 cells and 3 scalars from #161, all OK.\n* **The route's own superlative holds**: \"the largest single-prime capacity on record\" is 4, and the\n  cells attaining 4 on this surface are `(T_29, 31)` and `(T_31, 37)`.\n* **The nine convention-sensitive cells are named independently by two returns.** #645's\n  `gates.bank.unshifted_wrong` and #656's `gates.seam_cells` are the *same* nine cells —\n  (T_7,11) (T_11,31) (T_11,37) (T_11,191) (T_13,41) (T_13,43) (T_13,61) (T_19,199) (T_23,173) —\n  computed here as a set equality, not asserted. They are why the cell layer reports ten\n  disagreements and the citation layer only one: nine of the ten are a self-declared instrument\n  difference (`unshifted_matches: 271` of 280, in the artifact's own gate file), not drift.\n\n## The screen's own defects, and the controls for them\n\nThe first run of this screen reported seven \"disagreements\". Four parser defects produced or hid them,\nand each is now a control in `parser-controls.py` (log in `parser-controls.log`, `VERDICT: PASS`):\n\n1. **A data row read as a table header.** #622's per-level summary row `| T_5 | 3 | 43 | 2 | 7 | 42 | 1\n   | 0 |` is all-numeric, so the first parser took it as the column key and invented cells at p = 43\n   whose values were the `entries` column (43, 42, 41, 40, …). A header is now recognised only when the\n   line below it is a markdown separator; that table is no longer classified as a prime grid.\n2. **A loose integer reader on a witness row.** `72,150,222` was read as the value 72, giving cell\n   values far outside any possible L. Values must now be exactly one integer; `intval` is asserted to\n   refuse `72,150,222` and `-`.\n3. **Positional pairing of a report's rows.** #637's report prints two rows per block, so pairing each\n   value line with the line above paired it with the *other row*, inventing an impossible\n   (T_29, p = 2). The prime line is now found by walking upward to the nearest all-prime line of\n   matching arity — and the parser is asserted to still recover all 35 cells of that row.\n4. **#656's two-verdict encoding read as values.** Treating `row_ge2_ge3` as a row invented five\n   disagreements; the five `[2, true]` entries are recorded as bounds and the correct rule is asserted\n   to produce none of those five disagreements.\n\nHonest residual: two `at folds` occurrences in the corpus are in none of the four recognised statement\nshapes and are listed as unparsed with their quotes — they are an excess sequence (`6, 0, 0, 12, …, 120\nat folds 7 to 37`) and a value-less sentence, i.e. not statements about L. The prose layer recognises one\ncitation sentence shape; 22 marker occurrences of broader phrasings were enumerated and quoted in\n`citations.json`, and inspection shows they are embedded program text and log output in #161's report, a\nfilename, and a size comparison — not citation sentences. That count is on the record so the screen does\nnot claim to have read \"every\" phrasing.\n\n## Scope\n\nThis is a **citation** screen: it reads artifacts and compares statements. It recomputes nothing, so it\ncannot detect a value that every artifact states wrongly, and it says nothing about whether any row is\nmathematically right — only about whether each cited value has a source that says it. Its coverage is\nthe artifacts enumerated in `evidence.md` §1–§2: the served bodies of #161, #622, #627, #637, #644, #645,\n#656, route 27's `contribution_md`/`uncertainty_md`, the corpus's `U-FRAME.md`, and the files above.\nCell statements that exist only in un-fetched prose (for instance a return's `human_md`, or corpus files\nnot fetched here) are outside it. The nine instrument cells are reported as such and deliberately not\ncounted as drift. No asymptotic claim is made anywhere; the object is a finite-period one.\n\n## Prior art, updated 2026-09-24\n\nOnline search re-run for this decision, and the corpus's own recorded link to it checked.\n\n* The object is project-internal: `L(T_x,p)` is defined by the docs snapshot's own tools and generated by\n  `Lgrowth.js` / `a3-02-diagonal-f.js`. No external publication carries its per-cell values, so the\n  comparison targets can only be this corpus plus the rows on this record.\n* **A288815** (\"Paired Jacobsthal function applied to the product of the first n primes\") read live at\n  the OEIS: terms `2, 6, 18, 30, 66, 150, 192, 258, 366, 450, 570, 708, 894, 1044, 1284, 1422, 1656,\n  1902, 2190, 2460, 2622`, table to n = 21 — i.e. to prime **73**, matching Ziller–Morack, with the\n  formula `a(n) = 6·A072753(n) + 6` and the recorded comment that `a(n) < p_n² − p_n` for n ≥ 3 would\n  imply both Goldbach and the twin-prime conjecture. That is the neighbouring lane's published anchor,\n  and it stops at prime 73 while this record's rows run to prime 199.\n* Ziller & Morack, arXiv:1706.03668 (verified live: abs + html): algorithms plus computed paired\n  Jacobsthal values for primorials up to prime 73. Companion arXiv:1706.00317.\n* Exact remaining gap, unchanged by this return and now sharper: the record's cited values are all\n  attributable to served artifacts except one cell, which has no source in its cited return. What the\n  external literature cannot supply is the off-diagonal per-cell target — so closing route 27 against\n  published sources is not blocked by prior art but by needing the record's citations to hold, which\n  this return establishes for 460 of 461.\n\n## Next step\n\n`{\"question\": \"Does the withdrawn p = 163 transcription have further carriers on the record, and can the same one-command method be run over the whole project's citation surface rather than route 27's?\", \"method\": \"Two bounded parts. (a) Blast radius: search every route contribution/next-step text, every return body and the corpus for statements of L(T_31,163) or of 'the p = 163 cell' other than the citing return's, and report which carriers must be restated. (b) Generalisation: lift screen.py's two layers to the whole-route surface by taking every `cited_row`/`gate`/`corpus` structure and every '<v> (#<id>)' sentence on the record as the edge list, then resolving each against the named source's artifact fetched by content address. Report the drift set; each drift is a value whose correction must be withdrawn to its paraphrase origin.\", \"success\": \"No carrier repeats the 2 outside the citing return, and the generalised screen reports no drift edge beyond the ones already known.\", \"failure\": \"A route text or another return repeats the transcription, so a public claim rests on a value no artifact states; that text is named for restatement.\", \"compute\": {\"ram_gb\": 2, \"disk_gb\": 1, \"cpu_hours\": 0}, \"budget_hours\": 0.5}`\n\n## Cost, controls and outstanding\n\nMeasured in this turn: no large computation — the heaviest step is 39 HTTP GETs (12 artifacts by content\naddress, the 23 files #627 attached, 2 corpus files, and the #627 and #161 records) and five local passes\nover about 1 MB of fetched artifacts; peak resident well below the 2 GB hint, disk about 1 MB added. Every fetch's\naddress is checked before use and every hash is in `fetched-artifacts.json` / `fetched-627-161.json`. The\nparser controls are anti-vacuous in both directions: each reproduces the wrong result before asserting\nthe corrected parser does not produce it.\n\nReadiness for this epoch was re-run against the shared tool: `readiness/record-job2970.json` **21/21**,\nno failed checks (the pinned tool's `selftest` also re-verified, 66/66). No process was left running.\n\nUsage: this turn was still open at submission, so the transcript carries `usage: null` by design; the\nassignment's usage is **pending** and will be credited by the documented transcript-correction path once\nthe turn closes. It is not estimated here. The `outstanding` check over all issued attempts is run and\nrecorded; one issued attempt on this run is closed by this return.\n\nFor the person reading this: 88 returns of @maxime-fleury wait for a verdict. That queue is not ours to\nwork — verdicts come from trusted reviewers only — and nothing needs doing about it.\n","patch":null,"cpu_hours":0.2,"hashes":{"report.md":"38b20712861240335c8be54478ac7cb75bf98703a060e92c9708accc85d21003","screen.py":"f65a4b36440d4d72939c8942aa290674299e044318347301d35bac184019c0f6","cells.json":"285a272f65db946550e891ec4842b16525cf02f6db091adc39bd1c95a3440ba3","boundary.py":"78e2833789dcc1c63083ec4d634eea29be563552863839e8c704f29679ad6e08","evidence.md":"c9fecb8cf46c905b214c37e1b16eb43eb986c2fc541ff80ebd19c903127989f7","screen.json":"88cb39bcc214530b528025599227e9dc286860c83a0c35e19dbe7a4b62ea0d0c","citations.py":"64d451308e2bb67e9a51009a234be1dfa03941f0ea37eab4edb2f89fdb3fe349","637-report.md":"ca8cb2e0358e83d47cdb45435b8cd24fe47f92201067c27767faf878d65ffc6b","fetch-more.py":"8de92047bfb425c867b3302f82b9c2fd763d641b3e43f9e79cf8b5c21640cbeb","622-L-TABLE.md":"0978ace4e1a440524165b4156e612a8edb5b08f00937678214ecd7ce64e4da66","citations.json":"e71cbc0274481248f2c5519ba14e81c333cdfc4fdb558fd1e117cb908f7f58a5","622-L-grid.json":"b7451a99e8bae8f69fd0db7e13d5771dc70c9e3bc627d602a72f48082935f3c9","627-L-TABLE-29.md":"712016a85725077a93958e503b7a1743cfc8f98825ac8ee127e41176cf453a31","627-T29-grid.json":"22c08f836947f3517b2853cd16499169321fe0b7cf96b3c813792a1fefafeca7","637-L-TABLE-31.md":"b286e28d911935f62d0d0fbf88e18a57f6fa9602a00de91e5f14c3ef8b639080","637-T31-grid.json":"44257ab731e126d59dd5d237b9517f642e1e6c497f9c3f1c54ad44691062cca9","open-turn-note.md":"bb072d4b3e7213941af819e6b5818425a7f0299970affad2f4282f97e2c74314","637-analyse31.json":"76609756adbbc00e0b5bc2c45666779076d3e29eef96450a4bbb37f68d52cb06","parser-controls.py":"2d3165182c1225442c5da0323eddf5cd0c0a0b53be3ddc4bb5953ed5712066e8","evidence-index.json":"a0d596656f5bc9f9c52131a18ffc564c2ab91f460f44e08e64aee718f6c084a0","fetch-by-address.py":"cc5027637d0355a3c14dc5bb3a4422e0880115cafe8e6a6c5285768590afe3e3","parser-controls.log":"319738a0b1d34882c1f86d282263a73b7e37e0c3d00faac57a1eeed0d6c588fb","record-job2970.json":"37eed8debe2a6919b726f124fec6c6e0e11df5d4e0ad926e5802d409586a9a7c","fetched-627-161.json":"b6e98fa51090d85d9fe398531d43fc9ff27a3ca1ec14978b48fed572b9e4b3db","645-job1416-seam.json":"34c1baa8352f63d84f9d47b1a68e053456761012649ba51b414d24cb69fa1b02","645-job1416-gates.json":"06eea4a7f80855b6ae5e0eadfd8972637f7721a2de78ae028d0d1cd49f23f762","656-job1418-gates.json":"2521cd704e75256e5f6d05d9ba09cb64dcf87a1ffc90e1886b9443df33c621e4","fetched-artifacts.json":"bf33568616d569dce03b90e91211a5979ddb3687e85d298be240e833078c233f","screen-expectation.json":"cd431877831f27f941a0773688d4fdd3fb39d18b9f1505ec22445ffb53a4af90","656-job1418-level29.json":"bf08583a73d7bdfeb326cf389242a90d80fd36ff3c0dc663021ededa3880b494","656-job1418-level31.json":"384ead8300ab20009a6cdc550fdcf04f566274e2a946d13b2e4ddf985549bdd7","transcript_boundary.json":"c8499578c7ccb0f86fa1549ee3f6f615919b9a24e60904d822e009aaadd0f522","644-job1415-bank-diff.json":"471a01d8241506e7c03a0077bc88546dd54c61f9a7eb27b26ef8559deb63abca","transcript-2970-open.scrubbed.jsonl":"034d50bee1a411146ec6a8cfdf7056d48feb01bca2481b575632753fb756cb4e","034d50bee1a411146ec6a8cfdf7056d48feb01bca2481b575632753fb756cb4e":"transcript-2970-open.scrubbed.jsonl","06eea4a7f80855b6ae5e0eadfd8972637f7721a2de78ae028d0d1cd49f23f762":"645-job1416-gates.json","0978ace4e1a440524165b4156e612a8edb5b08f00937678214ecd7ce64e4da66":"622-L-TABLE.md","22c08f836947f3517b2853cd16499169321fe0b7cf96b3c813792a1fefafeca7":"627-T29-grid.json","2521cd704e75256e5f6d05d9ba09cb64dcf87a1ffc90e1886b9443df33c621e4":"656-job1418-gates.json","285a272f65db946550e891ec4842b16525cf02f6db091adc39bd1c95a3440ba3":"cells.json","2d3165182c1225442c5da0323eddf5cd0c0a0b53be3ddc4bb5953ed5712066e8":"parser-controls.py","319738a0b1d34882c1f86d282263a73b7e37e0c3d00faac57a1eeed0d6c588fb":"parser-controls.log","34c1baa8352f63d84f9d47b1a68e053456761012649ba51b414d24cb69fa1b02":"645-job1416-seam.json","37eed8debe2a6919b726f124fec6c6e0e11df5d4e0ad926e5802d409586a9a7c":"record-job2970.json","384ead8300ab20009a6cdc550fdcf04f566274e2a946d13b2e4ddf985549bdd7":"656-job1418-level31.json","38b20712861240335c8be54478ac7cb75bf98703a060e92c9708accc85d21003":"report.md","44257ab731e126d59dd5d237b9517f642e1e6c497f9c3f1c54ad44691062cca9":"637-T31-grid.json","471a01d8241506e7c03a0077bc88546dd54c61f9a7eb27b26ef8559deb63abca":"644-job1415-bank-diff.json","64d451308e2bb67e9a51009a234be1dfa03941f0ea37eab4edb2f89fdb3fe349":"citations.py","712016a85725077a93958e503b7a1743cfc8f98825ac8ee127e41176cf453a31":"627-L-TABLE-29.md","76609756adbbc00e0b5bc2c45666779076d3e29eef96450a4bbb37f68d52cb06":"637-analyse31.json","78e2833789dcc1c63083ec4d634eea29be563552863839e8c704f29679ad6e08":"boundary.py","88cb39bcc214530b528025599227e9dc286860c83a0c35e19dbe7a4b62ea0d0c":"screen.json","8de92047bfb425c867b3302f82b9c2fd763d641b3e43f9e79cf8b5c21640cbeb":"fetch-more.py","a0d596656f5bc9f9c52131a18ffc564c2ab91f460f44e08e64aee718f6c084a0":"evidence-index.json","b286e28d911935f62d0d0fbf88e18a57f6fa9602a00de91e5f14c3ef8b639080":"637-L-TABLE-31.md","b6e98fa51090d85d9fe398531d43fc9ff27a3ca1ec14978b48fed572b9e4b3db":"fetched-627-161.json","b7451a99e8bae8f69fd0db7e13d5771dc70c9e3bc627d602a72f48082935f3c9":"622-L-grid.json","bb072d4b3e7213941af819e6b5818425a7f0299970affad2f4282f97e2c74314":"open-turn-note.md","bf08583a73d7bdfeb326cf389242a90d80fd36ff3c0dc663021ededa3880b494":"656-job1418-level29.json","bf33568616d569dce03b90e91211a5979ddb3687e85d298be240e833078c233f":"fetched-artifacts.json","c8499578c7ccb0f86fa1549ee3f6f615919b9a24e60904d822e009aaadd0f522":"transcript_boundary.json","c9fecb8cf46c905b214c37e1b16eb43eb986c2fc541ff80ebd19c903127989f7":"evidence.md","ca8cb2e0358e83d47cdb45435b8cd24fe47f92201067c27767faf878d65ffc6b":"637-report.md","cc5027637d0355a3c14dc5bb3a4422e0880115cafe8e6a6c5285768590afe3e3":"fetch-by-address.py","cd431877831f27f941a0773688d4fdd3fb39d18b9f1505ec22445ffb53a4af90":"screen-expectation.json","e71cbc0274481248f2c5519ba14e81c333cdfc4fdb558fd1e117cb908f7f58a5":"citations.json","f65a4b36440d4d72939c8942aa290674299e044318347301d35bac184019c0f6":"screen.py"},"author_rung":"measured","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","created_at":"2026-09-24T01:09:45.455Z","repo_url":null,"commit":null,"cites":{"files":[],"handles":[],"returns":[161,622,627,637,644,645,656,1564],"messages":[]},"tokens":{"log":"custom","input":0,"models":{},"output":0,"source":"none","entries":0,"cache_read":0,"cache_write":0,"observed_models":[]},"paper_slug":null,"revision_path":null,"revision_sha":null,"recipe_md":null,"verification":null,"target":null,"finding":null,"human_md":null,"provisional":false,"effects_applied_at":null,"effort":"max","also_fix":null,"transcript_omitted":{"share":0,"omitted":0,"outputs":0},"patch_hash":null,"superseded_by":null,"duplicate_of":null,"transcript_resubmitted_at":null,"file_notes":null,"research":{"outcome":"progress","route_id":150,"next_step":{"method":"Two bounded parts. (a) Blast radius: search every route's contribution and next-step text, every return body and the corpus for statements of L(T_31,163), or of 'the p = 163 cell', outside the citing return, and report which carriers must be restated. (b) Generalisation: take every cited_row/gate/corpus structure and every '<v> (#<id>)' sentence on the record as the edge list, resolve each against the named source's artifact fetched by content address, and report the drift set.","compute":{"ram_gb":2,"disk_gb":1,"cpu_hours":0},"failure":"A route text or another return repeats the transcription, so a public claim rests on a value no artifact states; that text is named for restatement.","success":"No carrier repeats the 2 outside the citing return, and the generalised screen reports no drift beyond the edges already known.","question":"Does the withdrawn p = 163 transcription have further carriers on the record, and does the same two-layer screen find drift when run over the whole project's citation surface instead of route 27's?","budget_hours":0.5,"required_tools":[],"required_sources":[]},"depends_on":[161,622,627,637,644,645,656,1564],"evidence_md":"The route's recorded next experiment is run: every value route 27's comparison surface cites to another source, resolved against that source's OWN artifact, fetched by content address.\n\n(1) The screen, mechanically. 1,845 cells parsed from 12 artifacts fetched from /files/<sha> (all matching their addresses), #627's 23 attached files (all matching; #627 had never been fetched in this folder), 2 corpus files, the served bodies of #161/#622/#627/#637/#644/#645/#656 and route 27's own text. 351 distinct (level, prime) pairs; 341 stated by more than one source, none by only one. 461 of those cells are stated as ANOTHER source's; 460 agree with the cited source and exactly one does not. 2 prose claims of the shape '<v> ... (#<id> ...)' were extracted, one of which is that same cell; 3 scalar claims on the route's own text all resolve. 0 checks were left UNCHECKED.\n\n(2) The one drift edge is L(T_31, 163). #645's stages.t31.cited_row records 2 while its own instrument records 1 and its own mismatches_vs_cited records [{p:163, mine:1, cited:2}]; its report states '1 (this instrument) vs 2 (#637's published row)'. All five artifacts #637 filed state 1 (T31-grid.json row[163]=1 AND rows[163].L=1, analyse31.json, L-TABLE-31.md, report.md), and #656's independent re-measurement states 1 with no raw code 324 in the tile. So the 2 exists only inside the citing return's transcription of a row it compared against, and is described there as the source's published value.\n\n(3) Everything else on the surface holds. #644's re-read of the bank: 280/280 cited cells OK. The corpus: 22 cited cells OK, its diagonal stated in four shapes. #627's T_29 row: 107 cited cells OK across #645's structured row, #645's range-key row ('41..113' expanded over primes) and #637's printed row. #161: attached no files at all, yet its served body states every value the route cites from it, including '1307 entries computed (every tile-prime pair with p >= x, 7 <= p <= 1009)' and the corrected diagonal. The route's superlative 'largest single-prime capacity on record = 4' holds (attained at T_29/31 and T_31/37). The nine cells two returns independently name as convention-sensitive (#645's unshifted reading, #656's seam gate) are the same nine cells, so nine of the ten cell-layer disagreements are a self-declared instrument difference rather than drift.\n\n(4) The screen corrected its own instrument first. Its first run reported seven disagreements; four parser defects made or hid them (a data row read as a markdown header; a loose integer reader on a witness-gap row; positional pairing of a two-row report block, which invented an impossible (T_29, p=2); and #656's two-verdict row_ge2_ge3 read as values, which invented five). Each defect is now an anti-vacuous control in parser-controls.py (VERDICT: PASS), and two 'at folds' occurrences that match no statement shape are listed unparsed with their quotes rather than dropped.\n\nScope: this is a citation screen. It reads artifacts and recomputes nothing, so it cannot detect a value every artifact states wrongly; its coverage is the artifacts enumerated in the enclosed evidence.","prior_art_md":"Online search re-run for this decision (2026-09-24) and matched against the corpus's own recorded links.\n\n* The object, L(T_x,p), is project-internal: defined by the docs snapshot's own research/killrun.js and generated by Lgrowth.js / a3-02-diagonal-f.js. No external publication carries its per-cell values, so the comparison targets can only be this corpus plus the rows on the record.\n* A288815 read live at the OEIS, 'Paired Jacobsthal function applied to the product of the first n primes': 2, 6, 18, 30, 66, 150, 192, 258, 366, 450, 570, 708, 894, 1044, 1284, 1422, 1656, 1902, 2190, 2460, 2622 with table to n = 21, i.e. to prime 73 (formula a(n) = 6*A072753(n) + 6; the recorded comment that a(n) < p_n^2 - p_n for n >= 3 would imply both Goldbach and the twin-prime conjecture). Same capacity family, and it stops at prime 73 while this record's rows run to prime 199.\n* Ziller & Morack, arXiv:1706.03668 (abs + html verified live): algorithms and computed paired Jacobsthal values for primorials to prime 73; companion arXiv:1706.00317. Neither carries an L(T_x,p) table over twin-admissible tiles.\n* Exact remaining gap: what no external source can supply is the off-diagonal per-cell target, so route 27 cannot be closed against published literature; it can be closed against the record's own artifacts, and this return establishes that for 460 of 461 cited cells and names the one that fails. The gap is now a single citation, not a literature search."},"research_route_id":150,"verification_plan":{"cost":{"ram_gb":2,"disk_gb":1,"minutes":3,"cpu_hours":0.05,"judgment_minutes":20},"claim":"On route 27's comparison surface, 461 cells are stated by one artifact as another source's. 460 agree with the cited source's own served artifact; exactly one does not -- L(T_31, 163), which return #645 cites to return #637 as 2 while all five artifacts #637 filed state 1. Nine further cell-layer disagreements are a self-declared alternative instrument (the same nine cells are listed by #645's unshifted reading and #656's seam gate), not drift.","scope":"The artifacts enumerated in evidence.md (12 fetched by content address, #627's 23 files, 2 corpus files, the served bodies of #161/#622/#627/#637/#644/#645/#656 and route 27's text) and the cell statements their own text carries. It recomputes no value: it resolves citations.","tools":["python3"],"inputs":[],"checker":"f65a4b36440d4d72939c8942aa290674299e044318347301d35bac184019c0f6","command":"python3 parser-controls.py && python3 screen.py && python3 citations.py","targets":["637-T31-grid.json","645-job1416-seam.json","622-L-grid.json","627-T29-grid.json","656-job1418-level31.json"],"coverage":"decisive","expected":"parser-controls.py prints `VERDICT: PASS` (four anti-vacuous controls, each also reproducing the wrong first-run result); screen.py prints `cells parsed 1845`, `distinct cells 351`, `DISAGREEMENTS 10`, `bounds recorded (not cells) 5`; citations.py prints `cited cells resolved: 461 {'OK': 460, 'DRIFT': 1}`, `DRIFT: 2` (one structured row and one prose sentence, the same cell), `UNCHECKED: 0`, and the nine instrument cells identical across #645 and #656.","manifest":[{"path":"screen.py","role":"checker","sha256":"f65a4b36440d4d72939c8942aa290674299e044318347301d35bac184019c0f6"},{"path":"citations.py","role":"dependency","sha256":"64d451308e2bb67e9a51009a234be1dfa03941f0ea37eab4edb2f89fdb3fe349"},{"path":"parser-controls.py","role":"dependency","sha256":"2d3165182c1225442c5da0323eddf5cd0c0a0b53be3ddc4bb5953ed5712066e8"},{"path":"cells.json","role":"dependency","sha256":"285a272f65db946550e891ec4842b16525cf02f6db091adc39bd1c95a3440ba3"},{"path":"citations.json","role":"dependency","sha256":"e71cbc0274481248f2c5519ba14e81c333cdfc4fdb558fd1e117cb908f7f58a5"},{"path":"screen-expectation.json","role":"certificate","sha256":"cd431877831f27f941a0773688d4fdd3fb39d18b9f1505ec22445ffb53a4af90"},{"path":"637-T31-grid.json","role":"target","sha256":"44257ab731e126d59dd5d237b9517f642e1e6c497f9c3f1c54ad44691062cca9"},{"path":"645-job1416-seam.json","role":"target","sha256":"34c1baa8352f63d84f9d47b1a68e053456761012649ba51b414d24cb69fa1b02"},{"path":"622-L-grid.json","role":"target","sha256":"b7451a99e8bae8f69fd0db7e13d5771dc70c9e3bc627d602a72f48082935f3c9"},{"path":"627-T29-grid.json","role":"target","sha256":"22c08f836947f3517b2853cd16499169321fe0b7cf96b3c813792a1fefafeca7"},{"path":"656-job1418-level31.json","role":"target","sha256":"384ead8300ab20009a6cdc550fdcf04f566274e2a946d13b2e4ddf985549bdd7"}],"supports":"Establishes that the record's cited values on this surface have sources, that the single exception is the p = 163 transcription, and that the exception is decidable in one command. It does NOT establish that any row is mathematically correct -- no tile is built and no published value is recomputed -- nor that the surface is exhaustive: statements in artifacts not enumerated here are outside it.","comparison":"Exact integer equality per cell between the citing artifact's stated value and the cited source's own value; disagreements are reported, never resolved by preference. Counts are exact over the enumerated artifacts, and the nine instrument cells are compared as SETS between two returns.","assumptions":"The server served each artifact at the sha256 the record filed it under (checked before use, every fetch). Cell statements are parsed mechanically by the layers above; the two statement shapes the prose layer does not read are counted and listed in citations.json rather than claimed as covered.","coverage_md":"Decisive for the question it asks, over a stated surface: every cell the enumerated artifacts state as another source's (461 of 461) is compared, and every parsed row's provenance is in cells.json with a locator. It is not a proof about values: a value stated wrongly by every artifact is invisible to a citation screen, and that limit is stated in the report.","environment":"python3 standard library only (json, os, re, hashlib). Network is needed only for the two fetchers; the screen and the citation layer run from the local copies under raw/.","availability":{"status":"complete","details":"Checkers, outputs and the expectation certificate are in the manifest; every target is fetched from the content address the record filed it under, and the local copies are served with this return.","network":false,"required_sources":[]},"schema_version":1},"verification_fingerprint":"16aa97ce8f25023ed0431a96e6e801093fbb30b7fbe60e8ca2e8498b1cbe7ee5","review_admitted_at":null,"department_id":"dept_bd08e49ed9621cfd852f9b04","run_id":"run_f4fe9a8f2d4a84f4b5cc2990","triage_lead":null,"revision_base_sha":null,"integration":null,"resolves":null,"handle":"maxime-fleury","job_brief":"First update the online prior-work search for this experiment. If existing work covers it, record that and stop; otherwise run this bounded sprint on the uncovered uncertainty. Use cited published numbers during pursuit; their reproduction belongs in later validation. Build on the supplied findings; do not reconstruct earlier research. Return concrete progress and its cheapest credible check, a useful result for review, or a precisely scoped obstacle. Continued investment requires a distinct experiment.\n\nRead GET <project base>/research-routes/150 and return #1564. Return the ordinary report and transcript plus research: {route_id: 150, outcome: \"promising|progress|blocked|inconclusive|known|result\", evidence_md: \"what the evidence changes, <=4000 chars\", prior_art_md: \"updated online search record, sources and exact remaining gap, <=4000\", next_step: {question, method, success, failure, budget_hours} <only for continued pursuit>, obstacle: {kind, statement, assumptions, evidence, revisit_when} <for blocked/inconclusive>, depends_on: [<return ids actually required>]}. A result with a distinct next_step requests review and continues pursuit concurrently; omit next_step when no further experiment is warranted. Use known with prior_art_md and no next_step or obstacle when cited prior work already covers the proposed contribution; it stops automatic investigation without requesting review. The evidence grade is separate. Do not close a broad route because one proof attempt failed.","review_deferred":false,"in_triage":false,"triage":[],"verification_runs":[],"verification_state":{"execution":"not_attempted","conflict":false,"unresolved_conflict":false,"latest_receipt_id":0,"receipt_count":0,"resolution":null},"verification_summary":{"execution":"not_attempted","headline":"No independent execution recorded.","lines":["Claim: On route 27's comparison surface, 461 cells are stated by one artifact as another source's. 460 agree with the cited source's own served artifact; exactly one does not -- L(T_31, 163), which return #645 cites to return #637 as 2 while all five artifacts #637 filed state 1. Nine further cell-layer d… (shortened; full text on the return) Scope: The artifacts enumerated in evidence.md (12 fetched by content address, #627's 23 files, 2 corpus files, the served bodies of #161/#622/#627/#637/#644/#645/#656 and route 27's text) and the cell stat… (shortened; full text on the return)","Assumptions declared by the author: The server served each artifact at the sha256 the record filed it under (checked before use, every fetch). Cell statements are parsed mechanically by the layers above; the two statement shapes the prose layer does not read are counted and listed in citations.json rather than claimed as covered.","Why the check supports the claim, as the author argues it: Establishes that the record's cited values on this surface have sources, that the single exception is the p = 163 transcription, and that the exception is decidable in one command. It does NOT establish that any row is mathematically correct -- no tile is built and no published value is recomputed… (shortened; full text on the return)","Coverage declared by the author: decisive for this scope (a claim for review). Decisive for the question it asks, over a stated surface: every cell the enumerated artifacts state as another source's (461 of 461) is compared, and every parsed row's provenance is in cells.json with a locator. It is not a proof about va… (shortened; full text on the return)","Recorded without a review request; elevate it to put it before reviewers."],"coverage":"decisive","method":null,"controls":{"reported":false,"itemised":false,"detected":null,"total":null,"missed":[]},"receipts":{"total":0,"independent":0,"pass":0,"fail":0,"unable":0,"reused":0,"excluded":0},"pending_check":null,"unresolved_conflict":false,"latest_receipt_id":null,"basis":{"claim":"On route 27's comparison surface, 461 cells are stated by one artifact as another source's. 460 agree with the cited source's own served artifact; exactly one does not -- L(T_31, 163), which return #645 cites to return #637 as 2 while all five artifacts #637 filed state 1. Nine further cell-layer disagreements are a self-declared alternative instrument (the same nine cells are listed by #645's unshifted reading and #656's seam gate), not drift.","scope":"The artifacts enumerated in evidence.md (12 fetched by content address, #627's 23 files, 2 corpus files, the served bodies of #161/#622/#627/#637/#644/#645/#656 and route 27's text) and the cell statements their own text carries. It recomputes no value: it resolves citations.","assumptions":"The server served each artifact at the sha256 the record filed it under (checked before use, every fetch). Cell statements are parsed mechanically by the layers above; the two statement shapes the prose layer does not read are counted and listed in citations.json rather than claimed as covered.","supports":"Establishes that the record's cited values on this surface have sources, that the single exception is the p = 163 transcription, and that the exception is decidable in one command. It does NOT establish that any row is mathematically correct -- no tile is built and no published value is recomputed -- nor that the surface is exhaustive: statements in artifacts not enumerated here are outside it.","coverage_md":"Decisive for the question it asks, over a stated surface: every cell the enumerated artifacts state as another source's (461 of 461) is compared, and every parsed row's provenance is in cells.json with a locator. It is not a proof about values: a value stated wrongly by every artifact is invisible to a citation screen, and that limit is stated in the report.","comparison":"Exact integer equality per cell between the citing artifact's stated value and the cited source's own value; disagreements are reported, never resolved by preference. Counts are exact over the enumerated artifacts, and the nine instrument cells are compared as SETS between two returns."},"coverages":[],"caveats":[],"judgment":{"status":"recorded","provisional":false,"by":null,"rung":"recorded","trusted_reviews":0,"advisory_reviews":0,"receipt_id":null,"sufficiency_md":null}},"canonical_return":null,"review_history":[],"dependencies":[{"id":"161","status":"accepted","final_rung":"verified","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"622","status":"rejected","final_rung":null,"canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"627","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"637","status":"accepted","final_rung":"measured","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"644","status":"accepted","final_rung":"verified","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"645","status":"accepted","final_rung":"measured","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"656","status":"accepted","final_rung":"measured","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"1564","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null}],"research_url":"/projects/twin-primes/research-routes/150","transcript_url":"/projects/twin-primes/return/1571/transcript","files":[{"sha256":"38b20712861240335c8be54478ac7cb75bf98703a060e92c9708accc85d21003","name":"report.md","bytes":13889},{"sha256":"c9fecb8cf46c905b214c37e1b16eb43eb986c2fc541ff80ebd19c903127989f7","name":"evidence.md","bytes":27425},{"sha256":"a0d596656f5bc9f9c52131a18ffc564c2ab91f460f44e08e64aee718f6c084a0","name":"evidence-index.json","bytes":8293},{"sha256":"f65a4b36440d4d72939c8942aa290674299e044318347301d35bac184019c0f6","name":"screen.py","bytes":42331},{"sha256":"64d451308e2bb67e9a51009a234be1dfa03941f0ea37eab4edb2f89fdb3fe349","name":"citations.py","bytes":14065},{"sha256":"2d3165182c1225442c5da0323eddf5cd0c0a0b53be3ddc4bb5953ed5712066e8","name":"parser-controls.py","bytes":7737},{"sha256":"319738a0b1d34882c1f86d282263a73b7e37e0c3d00faac57a1eeed0d6c588fb","name":"parser-controls.log","bytes":2468},{"sha256":"cd431877831f27f941a0773688d4fdd3fb39d18b9f1505ec22445ffb53a4af90","name":"screen-expectation.json","bytes":1903},{"sha256":"88cb39bcc214530b528025599227e9dc286860c83a0c35e19dbe7a4b62ea0d0c","name":"screen.json","bytes":114715},{"sha256":"285a272f65db946550e891ec4842b16525cf02f6db091adc39bd1c95a3440ba3","name":"cells.json","bytes":375851},{"sha256":"e71cbc0274481248f2c5519ba14e81c333cdfc4fdb558fd1e117cb908f7f58a5","name":"citations.json","bytes":285250},{"sha256":"cc5027637d0355a3c14dc5bb3a4422e0880115cafe8e6a6c5285768590afe3e3","name":"fetch-by-address.py","bytes":4537},{"sha256":"8de92047bfb425c867b3302f82b9c2fd763d641b3e43f9e79cf8b5c21640cbeb","name":"fetch-more.py","bytes":4627},{"sha256":"bf33568616d569dce03b90e91211a5979ddb3687e85d298be240e833078c233f","name":"fetched-artifacts.json","bytes":3220},{"sha256":"b6e98fa51090d85d9fe398531d43fc9ff27a3ca1ec14978b48fed572b9e4b3db","name":"fetched-627-161.json","bytes":5266},{"sha256":"78e2833789dcc1c63083ec4d634eea29be563552863839e8c704f29679ad6e08","name":"boundary.py","bytes":4604},{"sha256":"c8499578c7ccb0f86fa1549ee3f6f615919b9a24e60904d822e009aaadd0f522","name":"transcript_boundary.json","bytes":2701},{"sha256":"bb072d4b3e7213941af819e6b5818425a7f0299970affad2f4282f97e2c74314","name":"open-turn-note.md","bytes":1802},{"sha256":"034d50bee1a411146ec6a8cfdf7056d48feb01bca2481b575632753fb756cb4e","name":"transcript-2970-open.scrubbed.jsonl","bytes":217},{"sha256":"37eed8debe2a6919b726f124fec6c6e0e11df5d4e0ad926e5802d409586a9a7c","name":"record-job2970.json","bytes":4778},{"sha256":"b7451a99e8bae8f69fd0db7e13d5771dc70c9e3bc627d602a72f48082935f3c9","name":"L-grid.json","bytes":69685},{"sha256":"0978ace4e1a440524165b4156e612a8edb5b08f00937678214ecd7ce64e4da66","name":"L-TABLE.md","bytes":3044},{"sha256":"22c08f836947f3517b2853cd16499169321fe0b7cf96b3c813792a1fefafeca7","name":"T29-grid.json","bytes":32527},{"sha256":"712016a85725077a93958e503b7a1743cfc8f98825ac8ee127e41176cf453a31","name":"L-TABLE-29.md","bytes":5756},{"sha256":"44257ab731e126d59dd5d237b9517f642e1e6c497f9c3f1c54ad44691062cca9","name":"T31-grid.json","bytes":5139},{"sha256":"76609756adbbc00e0b5bc2c45666779076d3e29eef96450a4bbb37f68d52cb06","name":"analyse31.json","bytes":6525},{"sha256":"b286e28d911935f62d0d0fbf88e18a57f6fa9602a00de91e5f14c3ef8b639080","name":"L-TABLE-31.md","bytes":3128},{"sha256":"ca8cb2e0358e83d47cdb45435b8cd24fe47f92201067c27767faf878d65ffc6b","name":"report.md","bytes":9505},{"sha256":"471a01d8241506e7c03a0077bc88546dd54c61f9a7eb27b26ef8559deb63abca","name":"job1415-bank-diff.json","bytes":26962},{"sha256":"34c1baa8352f63d84f9d47b1a68e053456761012649ba51b414d24cb69fa1b02","name":"job1416-seam.json","bytes":9694},{"sha256":"06eea4a7f80855b6ae5e0eadfd8972637f7721a2de78ae028d0d1cd49f23f762","name":"job1416-gates.json","bytes":27210},{"sha256":"bf08583a73d7bdfeb326cf389242a90d80fd36ff3c0dc663021ededa3880b494","name":"job1418-level29.json","bytes":2111},{"sha256":"384ead8300ab20009a6cdc550fdcf04f566274e2a946d13b2e4ddf985549bdd7","name":"job1418-level31.json","bytes":3623},{"sha256":"2521cd704e75256e5f6d05d9ba09cb64dcf87a1ffc90e1886b9443df33c621e4","name":"job1418-gates.json","bytes":839}],"decided_by_author_handle":false,"reviews":[],"decisions":[],"decision":null,"duplicates":[],"cited_messages":[]}