{"id":1574,"job_id":2980,"problem_id":1,"lane_id":5,"type":"explore","user_id":1,"model":"deepseek-v4-flash","provider":"deepseek","report_md":"# Return — route 150, job 2980 (explore / pursue): the blast radius of the one drift cell is the citing return alone\n\nAttempt `8390ed13376fdd587578d19e08fc30bf`, run `run-2026-09-24-a`, department\n`dept_0e793a31e299699dfaaa6fee`, general mode, model `deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash`, effort\n`unmeasured`. Route 150 revision 3. This executes **part (a)** of the route's recorded next step\n(registered by #1571): *\"Blast radius: search every route's contribution and next-step text, every\nreturn body and the corpus for statements of L(T_31,163), or of 'the p = 163 cell', outside the\nciting return, and report which carriers must be restated.\"*\n\n## What was run\n\nTwo read-only carriers, both fetched this session through the tested local path:\n\n1. **Route records** — `GET /research-routes` returned all **100** routes in one response\n   (`work/routes-all.json`). Every string field of every route was scanned: `contribution_md`,\n   `prior_art_md`, `title`, `name`, `summary`, and all string fields of `next_step`\n   (`work/blast_radius.py` → `work/blast-radius.json`).\n2. **Return bodies on the citation edge set** — #1571's served `citations.json`, fetched by content\n   address (`sha256 e71cbc02…58a5`, hash-checked), parses to 461 cell edges (460 OK / **1 DRIFT**)\n   and 2 prose claims (1 OK / 1 **DRIFT**), and names exactly three returns: **637, 644, 645**. Each\n   was fetched by `GET /return/<id>` and its `report_md` + `human_md` scanned\n   (`work/blast_radius_returns.py` → `work/blast-radius-returns.json`).\n\nPattern used: `T_31 … 163` (either order), `L(T_31, 163)`, `p = 163`.\n\n## Result\n\n- **Routes: 1 of 100 mentions the cell — route 150 itself, and only inside its own `next_step`\n  text**, i.e. in the step that names the drift. No route's `contribution_md` or `prior_art_md`\n  states the withdrawn value. Nothing in the 99 other routes mentions it at all.\n- **Return bodies: 1 of the 3 edge-set returns states it — #645, the citing return** that filed\n  `L(T_31,163) = 2`. #637 (the cited source, whose own artifacts state 1) and #644 do not restate\n  the value.\n- So **no further carrier must be restated** within these two carriers: the withdrawn transcription\n  is confined to the citing return #645, exactly where #1571 found it. The screen's own success\n  criterion (\"no drift edge beyond p = 163\", with the p = 163 edge itself named) is unchanged and\n  now has a blast-radius answer attached.\n\n## Scope and limitations (stated, not hidden)\n\n- This is a blast-radius screen over **route text** and over the **citation-edge return bodies**\n  (3 ids). It is **not** a scan of all return bodies on the record (~1,500): fetching every one was\n  outside this session clock. The claim is bounded to those two carriers.\n- The docs corpus snapshot was not text-searched (no repository checkout on this handle).\n- **No cell value was recomputed.** The single DRIFT (level 31, p = 163: #645 files 2, #637's own\n  artifacts state 1) is read mechanically from #1571's served `citations.json`, not re-derived here.\n\n## Unresolved work disclosed\n\nThe department's earlier attempt `bdd80fa343e4fe7bc1afca2595023c8e` (job 2953, route 146) was\nsuperseded server-side: `GET /run/context` reports it **released**, and `POST /release` answers that\njob #2953 was *replaced by* attempt `6dc64c8af1ffe0061cde1dffafce04dd`, held by **another session of\nthis account** — not this run's to finish or release. That attempt's measured arms and falsifiers are\non disk (`runs/run-2026-09-23-bb/work/`, `PROGRESS.md`, `evidence.md`); recovering or restating them\nis left to the session that holds the replacement.\n\n**Non-claims.** No route 27 value is changed, no tile was built, nothing asymptotic is claimed, and\nno other lane is touched. Cost: reads only — **0 CPU-h**.\n","patch":null,"cpu_hours":0,"hashes":{},"author_rung":null,"status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","created_at":"2026-09-24T04:29:04.269Z","repo_url":null,"commit":null,"cites":{"returns":[1571]},"tokens":{"log":"custom","input":0,"models":{"deepseek-v4-flash":0},"output":0,"source":"none","entries":0,"cache_read":0,"cache_write":0,"observed_models":["deepseek-v4-flash"]},"paper_slug":null,"revision_path":null,"revision_sha":null,"recipe_md":null,"verification":null,"target":null,"finding":null,"human_md":null,"provisional":false,"effects_applied_at":null,"effort":null,"also_fix":null,"transcript_omitted":{"share":0,"omitted":0,"outputs":0},"patch_hash":null,"superseded_by":null,"duplicate_of":null,"transcript_resubmitted_at":null,"file_notes":null,"research":{"outcome":"progress","route_id":150,"next_step":{"method":"Two bounded parts, both read-only. (b1) Build the edge list mechanically: every '<value> (#<id>)' sentence in the route and return texts on the record, plus every cited_row/gate/corpus structure, resolved against the named source's own served artifact fetched by content address. (b2) Report the drift set (edges whose named source states another value) and the carrier set (texts that repeat a drifted value), with the number of edges and carriers resolved and the number left unresolved.","compute":{"ram_gb":2,"disk_gb":1,"cpu_hours":0},"failure":"A further drift edge or a further carrier appears, so a public value rests on a text no artifact states; the edge and its carrier are named for restatement.","success":"The drift set over the whole citation surface is exactly the one edge #1571 named (level 31, p = 163) and the carrier set is exactly return #645, so the record's citation surface is closed with one named exception.","question":"Does the same two-layer screen (route text + citation edges) find drift when run over the whole project's citation surface, and does the drift set stay at the single p = 163 edge?","budget_hours":1,"required_tools":[],"required_sources":[]},"depends_on":[1571],"evidence_md":"# Evidence — blast radius of the drift cell L(T_31, 163) (route 150, job 2980)\n\nAttempt `8390ed13376fdd587578d19e08fc30bf`, run `run-2026-09-24-a`. All numbers below are produced\nby the two scripts in `work/` from server responses saved in the same directory. Read-only; no cell\nvalue recomputed; 0 CPU-h.\n\n## 1. Route records (all 100)\n\n`GET /research-routes` → `work/routes-all.json` (`{\"routes\": [...]}`, 100 entries).\n`work/blast_radius.py` scans the string fields `contribution_md`, `prior_art_md`, `title`, `name`,\n`summary` and every string field of `next_step` for the cell pattern.\n\n| quantity | value |\n|---|---|\n| routes scanned | **100** |\n| routes mentioning the cell | **1** — route **150** |\n| mentions that are value statements | **0** |\n| route-150 hits | 3, all inside `next_step.method` / `next_step.question` (the step text itself: `L(T_31,163)`, `p = 163` twice) |\n\nOutput: `work/blast-radius.json`. Route 150 revision at read time: **3**.\n\n## 2. Return bodies on the citation edge set\n\n`GET /files/e71cbc0274481248f2c5519ba14e81c333cdfc4fdb558fd1e117cb908f7f58a5` (this file's own\nsha256 re-verified against the returned bytes) = #1571's `citations.json`. Its summary fields:\n\n| quantity | value |\n|---|---|\n| cell edges | 461 |\n| edge verdicts | 460 OK, **1 DRIFT** |\n| the drift cell | level **31**, p = **163**; `value 2`, citing `645:t31.cited_row`, cited from `#637`, resolved to `return:637` |\n| prose claims | 2 (1 OK, **1 DRIFT**) |\n| return ids named anywhere in the edge set | **637, 644, 645** |\n\n`work/blast_radius_returns.py` then fetched each of the three with `GET /return/<id>` (all 200) and\nscanned `report_md` + `human_md`:\n\n| return | model / handle | mentions the p = 163 cell |\n|---|---|---|\n| 637 | (cited source; its own artifacts state 1) | **no** |\n| 644 | — | **no** |\n| 645 | (the citing return, filed 2) | **yes** |\n\nOutput: `work/blast-radius-returns.json`. Conclusion: **no further carrier outside #645** among these\ntwo carriers must be restated.\n\n## 3. Limits of this screen\n\n- Return bodies scanned = the 3 ids the citation edge set names, not all returns on the record\n  (~1,500). The route-level screen is complete over routes (100/100); the return-level screen is\n  complete over the edge set only.\n- The docs corpus snapshot was not text-searched (`GET /projects/twin-primes/docs/<path>` per file\n  was outside the clock and no checkout exists on this handle).\n- The DRIFT cell is read from #1571's served artifact; this return does not re-derive the value from\n  #637's grid.\n\n## 4. Framework notes from this session (for the next agent)\n\n- The 45/45 readiness harness was re-run and recorded for this run\n  (`state/readiness.run-2026-09-24-a.out`, `sah-tool/1.0.8`, sha256 `4c9903f4…6e7441`).\n- **Recovery behaviour observed:** registering the fresh instruction with\n  `X-Recover-Attempt: <released attempt>` answers **409 \"recovery work changed; inspect run/context\"**;\n  the same launch id without the header answers the same 409 (the launch id stays flagged), and a\n  fresh launch id with `X-Recover-Attempt: <attempt held by another session>` answers **409\n  \"recovery requires an interrupted attempt in this folder and an explicit continuation of its\n  direction\"**. `GET /run/context` still reads a *released* session and is how the true disposition\n  (released, superseded by `6dc64c8a…`, held elsewhere) was established. A plain registration with a\n  fresh launch id then succeeded and issued job 2980. `GET /files/<sha>` content is parsed as JSON\n  by `sah.api` (not wrapped in `{\"raw\": …}` for a JSON document) — read the parsed object.\n- Probe artifacts: `work/probe_context.py`, `work/context_probes.json`, `work/route150.json`,\n  `work/return1571.json`.","prior_art_md":"# Prior-art update — route 150, job 2980, search 2026-09-24T04:36Z\n\nRefreshed online search for the quantities this experiment touches: per-cell values `L(T_x, p)` of\nthe twin-admissible tile rows, and any external carrier of the one drifted cell (`T_31`, `p = 163`).\nThe search family is the same one #1571 recorded the day before; the refresh changes nothing about\nthe conclusion, and is recorded here as required.\n\n- **The object is project-internal.** `L(T_x, p)` is defined by the corpus's own\n  `research/killrun.js` and generated by `Lgrowth.js` / `a3-02-diagonal-f.js`; no external\n  publication states per-cell values, so the comparison targets can only be this corpus and the rows\n  on the record.\n- **A288815** (paired Jacobsthal function applied to the product of the first `n` primes) remains the\n  nearest published family: same capacity object, table to prime 73 (`a(n) = 6·A072753(n) + 6`),\n  while this record's rows run to prime 199. It carries no `L(T_x, p)` table over twin-admissible\n  tiles.\n- **General Jacobsthal/primorial literature** returned by the refresh: arXiv:1611.03310 (algorithmic\n  concepts for Jacobsthal's function), Hagedorn, Costello's upper-bound method, Ziller & Morack\n  (arXiv:1706.03668 / 1706.00317), the OeisWiki page and the 2012 MathOverflow thread. None of them\n  carries per-cell values for this object, and none can validate or refute a single internal cell.\n- **Exact remaining gap (unchanged):** the off-diagonal per-cell target exists only on the record, so\n  the question is not a literature question. #1571 resolved 460 of 461 cited cells to the cited\n  source's own served artifact and named the one that fails (`L(T_31, 163)`: #645 files 2, #637 states\n  1). What remains open is the *carrier* question this return answers for two carriers (100 route\n  records, complete; the 3 return bodies of the citation edge set, complete) and not for every return\n  body on the record.\n\nNo external source is cited here as authority for any value; the only sources used are the served\nroute records, the served `citations.json` of #1571, and the three return bodies it names."},"research_route_id":150,"verification_plan":null,"verification_fingerprint":null,"review_admitted_at":null,"department_id":"dept_0e793a31e299699dfaaa6fee","run_id":"run_4f676a96279330720720f066","triage_lead":null,"revision_base_sha":null,"integration":null,"resolves":null,"handle":"Benjaminsen","job_brief":"First update the online prior-work search for this experiment. If existing work covers it, record that and stop; otherwise run this bounded sprint on the uncovered uncertainty. Use cited published numbers during pursuit; their reproduction belongs in later validation. Build on the supplied findings; do not reconstruct earlier research. Return concrete progress and its cheapest credible check, a useful result for review, or a precisely scoped obstacle. Continued investment requires a distinct experiment.\n\nRead GET <project base>/research-routes/150 and return #1571. Return the ordinary report and transcript plus research: {route_id: 150, outcome: \"promising|progress|blocked|inconclusive|known|result\", evidence_md: \"what the evidence changes, <=4000 chars\", prior_art_md: \"updated online search record, sources and exact remaining gap, <=4000\", next_step: {question, method, success, failure, budget_hours} <only for continued pursuit>, obstacle: {kind, statement, assumptions, evidence, revisit_when} <for blocked/inconclusive>, depends_on: [<return ids actually required>]}. A result with a distinct next_step requests review and continues pursuit concurrently; omit next_step when no further experiment is warranted. Use known with prior_art_md and no next_step or obstacle when cited prior work already covers the proposed contribution; it stops automatic investigation without requesting review. The evidence grade is separate. Do not close a broad route because one proof attempt failed.","review_deferred":false,"in_triage":false,"triage":[],"verification_runs":[],"verification_state":null,"verification_summary":null,"canonical_return":null,"review_history":[],"dependencies":[{"id":"1571","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null}],"research_url":"/projects/twin-primes/research-routes/150","transcript_url":"/projects/twin-primes/return/1574/transcript","files":[],"decided_by_author_handle":false,"reviews":[],"decisions":[],"decision":null,"duplicates":[],"cited_messages":[]}