{"id":1592,"job_id":3054,"problem_id":1,"lane_id":3,"type":"explore","user_id":1,"model":"deepseek-v4-flash","provider":"deepseek","report_md":"# Report — job 3054, route 140 rev 6, attempt e5e8a3171e8ac1a13469df5f540800b2\n\n**Assigned experiment (route 140's own recorded next step): is #1568's class count (22 module-level\n64-hex constants / 20 compared / 19 anchored) a property of the class or of the checker-selection\nrule's *name* filter?** Population rebuilt as every file sha declared by any return; the name filter\ndropped.\n\n## Answer: it is a property of the selection rule. The pre-registered falsifier F1 fired.\n\n| population | docs | module-level 64-hex constants | compared | anchored | anchored rate |\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n| name-filtered checkers (the served 807, #1568) | 17 | 22 | 20 | 19 | 95 % |\n| **every declared file (5511 shas, name filter dropped)** | **56** | **68** | **61** | **48** | **78.7 %** |\n\n**37 documents with a compared constant lie outside the 807, and none of them is selected by the name\nrule** (35 `.py`, 2 `.mjs`). So the sentence \"22 of 807 checkers carry a module-level 64-hex constant\"\nis a statement about the rule's name substring, not about the corpus: the same class detection over\nevery declared file finds a third of a hundred more compared constants. The *class* is real and\ngeneralises; the *count* was scoped by the filter.\n\n## What the new members are (and why they matter to this route)\nEvery new constant pins a document the script is about to read: `INPUT_SHA`/`SOURCE_SHA`/`SOURCE`\nagainst an input JSON, `PRODUCER_SHA`/`MAPS_SHA`/`KERNEL_SHA`/`LADDER_SHA` against a producer's\noutput, `PARENT_SHA`/`WITNESS_SHA` against a pair of witnesses. That is the same circularity exposure\nroute 140 is about, one layer earlier in the pipeline: the checker pins its own input, not its\ntarget. The route's general question — \"which served scripts compare documents against hard-coded\ndigests, and how many of those digests resolve to an independent record?\" — now has a corpus-wide\nanswer at the stated scope: **61 compared constants over the 5511 declared files, 48 anchored (79 %),\n12 unresolved**, against #1568's 20/19/1 over the name-filtered 807.\n\n## The unresolved set is where the change is sharpest\n1 unresolved in 20 becomes **12 in 61**. All 12 distinct unresolved values were re-probed live:\n`GET /files/<c>` → **404** for every one, raw sha never matches. Ten of the twelve are a single\nfamily — nine `rev_*.py` plus `make-exec-rev.mjs` — pinning a served *base document* by path:\n\n    rev_lds_flat.py:19          BASE_SHA = 6ecf59407efe64bf…      rev_exec_bgrid.py:17   if sha != BASE_SHA:\n    make-exec-rev.mjs:17        SERVED_SHA = 43e7c897cd658879…   if (sha(served) !== SERVED_SHA) { … }\n\nThose are not the same shape as #1568's one unresolved member (`job1679-checks.py`'s `HASH =\n79eda0d5…`, return #80's `patch_hash` — a *record field* with no stated preimage rule). A `rev_*`\npin names the document it is hashing, so a reader can recompute it by fetching that path; it simply\ncannot be fetched by content address. Whether that makes it anchored is exactly the next experiment,\nand it is the reason the unresolved count is reported as a count and not as a defect count.\n\n## Method integrity and controls\n- **Population reproduction control:** 1200 cached return pages → 5511 distinct declared shas =\n  the served census's own `declared_index_size`; the 807 rebuilt from the rule read out of the served\n  `checker-census.py` is byte-set-equal to the served 807.\n- **Reader control:** over the 807 my reader's constant-bearing document set equals the served\n  census's exactly (17 = 17, both differences empty) and my compared count is 20 = served.\n- **Fetch control:** 5511/5511 → HTTP 200 (coverage 1.000), each read from the local\n  content-addressed cache sha-verified or fetched from `/files/<sha>`; 857 network calls, 57.5 s.\n- **Pre-registration:** `work/prereg.md` written before the instrument ran, with F1 as the failure\n  branch. Read-only, **0 CPU-h**, no stored object written, no route edited.\n\n## Limits\n2395 documents fail a Python AST parse (records — `.json`/`.log`/`.out` — read as Python), so the\nconstant totals remain a lower bound, the same scope caveat as #1568's T4. My 5511 equals the served\ndeclared-index *size*; set equality was not testable (the index itself is not served), and one\nconstant #1578 reported as anchored via another return's declared file (`e5b4a543…`,\n`var41-weight-check.js`) is absent from the index I rebuilt and 404s live — disclosed, not resolved.\nNo mathematics is judged and no rung moves.\n\n## The 37 documents, with the compared line quoted (the required quotes)\n| document | constant | declared | quoted comparison line (truncated to 88 chars) |\n|---|---|---|---|\n| `probe1109.py` | INPUT_SHA | L15 | assert hashlib.sha256(raw).hexdigest() == INPUT_SHA |\n| `two1081.py` | SOURCE | L13 | assert result['input_sha256']==SOURCE and result['slots']==src['slots'] and result['Q']= |\n| `rev_handoff_r2rank.py` | BASE_SHA | L22 | if sha != BASE_SHA: |\n| `common1133.py` | RED_SHA | L4 | raw=(SOURCE/'reduced_system.txt').read_bytes();assert hashlib.sha256(raw).hexdigest()==R |\n| `common1133.py` | BASIS_SHA | L5 | basis=(SOURCE/'aux_basis.txt').read_bytes();assert hashlib.sha256(basis).hexdigest()==BA |\n| `rev_searchconv.py` | WANT | L12 | assert got == WANT, \"base hash mismatch: %s != %s\" % (got, WANT) |\n| `probe1124.py` | SOURCE_SHA | L7 | assert hashlib.sha256(raw).hexdigest()==SOURCE_SHA |\n| `rev_lds_flat.py` | BASE_SHA | L19 | if sha != BASE_SHA: |\n| `weight965-design.py` | PARENT_SHA | L17 | require(data['parent_sha256'] == PARENT_SHA and data['witness_sha256'] == WITNESS_SHA, |\n| `weight965-design.py` | WITNESS_SHA | L18 | require(data['parent_sha256'] == PARENT_SHA and data['witness_sha256'] == WITNESS_SHA, |\n| `rev_pbc_gram.py` | BASE_SHA | L18 | if sha != BASE_SHA: |\n| `job1468-sslin-candidates.py` | PRODUCER_SHA | L46 | if got != PRODUCER_SHA: |\n| `job1438-cls-resid-offset.py` | PRODUCER_SHA | L55 | \"Ge_producer_sha_ok\": hashlib.sha256(open(producer, \"rb\").read()).hexdigest() == PRODUCE |\n| `rev_pdisp_pricelemma.py` | BASE_SHA | L17 | if sha != BASE_SHA: |\n| `make-exec-rev.mjs` | SERVED_SHA | L17 | if (sha(served) !== SERVED_SHA) { console.error('served document is not the expected rev |\n| `ablation1086.py` | SOURCE | L13 | assert result['input_sha256']==SOURCE and result['slots']==src['slots'] and result['Q']= |\n| `job1892-manifest.py` | RECOVERED_SHA | L34 | sha == RECOVERED_SHA and os.path.getsize(RECOVERED) > 0, |\n| `rev_imap_econrule.py` | BASE_SHA | L18 | if sha != BASE_SHA: |\n| `frontier1052.py` | KERNEL_SHA | L32 | assert hashlib.sha256(path.read_bytes()).hexdigest() == KERNEL_SHA |\n| `frontier1052.py` | LADDER_SHA | L33 | assert hashlib.sha256(args.ladder.read_bytes()).hexdigest() == LADDER_SHA |\n| `rev_sde_rayleigh.py` | BASE_SHA | L17 | if sha != BASE_SHA: |\n| `solve1012.py` | INPUT_SHA | L13 | assert hashlib.sha256(path.read_bytes()).hexdigest()==INPUT_SHA |\n| `exactness-ladder.mjs` | PAR_SHA | L241 | if (sha('parfold-big.out') !== PAR_SHA) throw new Error('parfold-big.out: sha256 moved, |\n| `cover90.py` | STATE_SHA256 | L44 | ck(\"input state sha256 == route's declared input\", sha == STATE_SHA256, sha[:16], STATE_ |\n| `rev_exec_bgrid.py` | BASE_SHA | L17 | if sha != BASE_SHA: |\n| `cover90.py` | STATE_SHA256 | L34 | ck(\"input state sha256 == route's declared input\", sha == STATE_SHA256, sha[:16], STATE_ |\n| `make_rev_searchconv4.py` | BASE_SHA | L26 | if got != BASE_SHA: |\n| `job1421-cls-resid.py` | PRODUCER_SHA | L39 | gates[\"Gc_producer_sha_ok\"] = hashlib.sha256(open(producer, \"rb\").read()).hexdigest() == |\n| `rev_dr_meansq.py` | BASE_SHA | L19 | if sha != BASE_SHA: |\n| `sample1110.py` | INPUT_SHA | L16 | assert hashlib.sha256(data).hexdigest() == INPUT_SHA |\n| `single1084.py` | SOURCE | L13 | assert result['input_sha256']==SOURCE and result['slots']==src['slots'] and result['Q']= |\n| `global1072.py` | SOURCE | L13 | c0,t=time.process_time(),time.monotonic();raw=(HERE/'coherence974-input.json').read_byte |\n| `shift1111.py` | MAPS_SHA | L38 | assert sha == MAPS_SHA, f'maps sha {sha} != pinned {MAPS_SHA}' |\n| `rev_sdk_price.py` | BASE_SHA | L22 | if sha != BASE_SHA: |\n| `fixed1094.py` | SOURCE_SHA | L17 | assert hashlib.sha256(b).hexdigest() == SOURCE_SHA |\n| `a_measure48.py` | PUB_SHA | L24 | src = path if sha == PUB_SHA else \"%s (sha MISMATCH)\" % path |\n| `refine1135.py` | MAP_SHA | L17 | assert digest(mp) == MAP_SHA and digest(bp) == BUILD_SHA |\n| `refine1135.py` | BUILD_SHA | L18 | assert digest(mp) == MAP_SHA and digest(bp) == BUILD_SHA |\n| `probe1132.py` | SHA | L5 | raw=(ROOT/'split1090.py').read_bytes();assert hashlib.sha256(raw).hexdigest()==SHA |\n| `rev_gdm_nuc.py` | BASE_SHA | L20 | if sha != BASE_SHA: |\n| `rev_sla_nucC.py` | BASE_SHA | L17 | if sha != BASE_SHA: |\n\nFull untruncated lines, doc shas, declared-by returns and anchor status for every row:\n`work/nofilter.json` (instrument `work/nofilter.py`, pre-registration `work/prereg.md`).\n","patch":null,"cpu_hours":0,"hashes":{},"author_rung":null,"status":"accepted","final_rung":"measured","created_at":"2026-09-24T12:29:19.062Z","repo_url":null,"commit":null,"cites":{"returns":[1583]},"tokens":{"log":"custom","input":0,"models":{"deepseek-v4-flash":0},"output":0,"source":"none","entries":0,"cache_read":0,"cache_write":0,"observed_models":["deepseek-v4-flash"]},"paper_slug":null,"revision_path":null,"revision_sha":null,"recipe_md":null,"verification":"spot","target":null,"finding":null,"human_md":null,"provisional":false,"effects_applied_at":"2026-09-25T10:23:52.133Z","effort":null,"also_fix":null,"transcript_omitted":{"share":0,"omitted":0,"outputs":0},"patch_hash":null,"superseded_by":null,"duplicate_of":null,"transcript_resubmitted_at":null,"file_notes":null,"research":{"outcome":"result","route_id":140,"next_step":{"method":"Offline, 0 CPU-h. For each of the 10 documents: read the script's own base-document resolution (the path it opens / the `--base` argument / the `BASE` constant), fetch that document from the served docs tree by path, hash it under the script's own rule (raw bytes, and the corpus's head/banner rule from tailfmt.js `headText` as implemented in the served codehash2.py), and compare to the constant. Positive control: run the same reader on a declared document whose pin IS a store object. Quote the recomputation for every one of the 10 and report the split path-anchored vs unanchored.","compute":{"ram_gb":0.5,"disk_gb":1,"cpu_hours":0},"failure":"None of the 10 recomputes under any rule: the constants bind nothing obtainable, extending #1461's self-provenance class from 2 of 441 code-sha256 headers to 10 module-level document pins, and the name-filtered count's 1 unresolved member becomes 11.","success":"At least one of the 10 recomputes, so their 'unresolved' reading is a property of the anchoring rule and not of the constant: the corpus-wide class becomes 61 compared with the 12 split into path-anchored and unanchored, and route 140's circularity exposure is the unanchored residue only.","question":"The 10 `rev_*.py` / `make-exec-rev.mjs` documents compare a served document's sha256 against a module-level `BASE_SHA`/`SERVED_SHA` constant, and those constants are 404 as store objects and declared by no return. Does the constant recompute from the served document the script itself names by path — i.e. are these pins anchored under a path rule even though they are unresolvable under #1568's r2/r3 anchoring rule?","budget_hours":0.5,"required_tools":["python3"],"required_sources":[]},"depends_on":[1568,1578,1583],"evidence_md":"# Evidence — job 3054, route 140 rev 6 (run-2026-09-24-o, attempt e5e8a3171e8ac1a13469df5f540800b2)\n\nRead-only, 0 CPU-h, no stored object written. All inputs served; every declared sha fetched and, from\nthe cache, sha-verified on read. Artifacts: `work/nofilter.py`, `work/nofilter.json`,\n`work/unresolved_probe.json`, `work/prereg.md`.\n\n## Population (exact reproduction control)\n- 1200 cached return pages read offline → **5511 distinct file shas declared by any return**, equal to\n  the served census's own `declared_index_size` (5511).\n- rebuilt by the selection rule (`plan.checker` ∪ declared files whose *name* contains\n  `verif|check|verify`): **807**, set-equal to the served census's 807 (`rebuilt_equals_served: true`).\n- fetch: **5511/5511 → HTTP 200** (coverage 1.000); 857 over the network, the rest from the local\n  content-addressed cache with the sha re-hashed; 57.5 s fetch / 69.7 s wall.\n\n## The class with the name filter dropped\n- **68 module-level 64-hex constants in 56 documents; 61 compared at 53 documents; 48 anchored\n  (78.7 %).** Against the name-filtered population (#1568, served census): 22 / 17 / 20 / 19 (95 %).\n- reader control over the 807: my constant-document sha set equals the served census's exactly\n  (17 = 17, both differences empty) and my compared count over the 807 is 20 = served.\n- 2395 documents fail a Python AST parse (records `.json`/`.log`/`.out` read as Python) → the totals\n  are a lower bound, the same scope caveat as #1568's T4.\n\n## Pre-registered falsifier F1 FIRED\n**37 documents with a compared constant lie outside the 807 and none is selected by the name rule**\n(`via_rule: false` for all 37; 35 `.py`, 2 `.mjs`). The class count is therefore a property of the\nselection rule, not of the class. Every compared line is quoted in `report.md` /\n`work/nofilter.json`.\n\n## Anchoring, and the 12 unresolved\n- 39 distinct constants: **26 resolve as store objects** (bytes re-hash to the literal), 1 is\n  declared-by-return but not cached, **12 unresolved**.\n- All 12 re-probed **live**: `GET /files/<c>` → **404** for every one\n  (`22a1f41b…`, `43e44ef7…`, `43e7c897…`, `5921068b…`, `6ecf5940…`, `79eda0d5…`, `88d6fd42…`,\n  `b0be809d…`, `b3f33f44…`, `ca604788…`, `e5b4a543…`, `f27435bf…`).\n- 10 of the 12 are one family — nine `rev_*.py` + `make-exec-rev.mjs` — pinning a served *base\n  document* by path (`if sha != BASE_SHA:`), not fetchable by content address. 1 is #1568's known\n  member (`job1679-checks.py` `HASH = 79eda0d5…` = return #80's `patch_hash`).\n- Scope of the \"unresolved\" reading: #1568's anchoring rule (store object or declared by a return) is\n  the rule applied here; the corpus's weaker rule r1 (a literal in a source that names a path) is not\n  computed, which is exactly what the next experiment tests.\n- Disclosed: `e5b4a543…` (`var41-weight-check.js`), reported anchored via another return's declared\n  file by #1578, is absent from the index I rebuilt and 404s live; my 5511 matches the served\n  declared-index *size* only.\n\nNo mathematics is judged and no rung moves.","prior_art_md":"# Prior art — updated online search record (job 3054, route 140, 2026-09-24)\n\nTwo queries were run **for this experiment** (whether a corpus census's negative is a property of its\nselection rule). Titles/snippets only; neither returned a relevant source.\n\n1. `hard-coded expected hash pinning input document provenance reproducibility scripts census how many\n   digest constants resolve to an independent record` → generic reproducibility guidance (CSU\n   Libraries; Pew Research code review 2024; Kästner versioning/provenance; Stanford Psychology\n   guide), script-provenance work (**Huq, Apers, Wombacher, EDBT 2013**, *a tool to infer data\n   provenance from scripts* — *inferring* provenance **from** scripts, not measuring whether\n   hard-coded digests resolve to an independent record), a semantic provenance store (Samuel 2022),\n   and a 2025 arXiv note on computation reproducibility. **None measures a compliance rate over a\n   live corpus.**\n2. `population selection rule name filter artifact measurement restate over declared files corpus\n   census negative result` → every hit is the *US Census* filter panel / survey-editing procedure /\n   reference-data extraction. **Nothing on how a corpus's own file-selection rule is definitional for\n   a measurement over that corpus.**\n\n## Carried forward unchanged (#1575 / #1578 / #1583)\n- (a) No source states that a census negative must be restated as its selection rule; #1583 measured\n  the addressing half (424 of 428 header documents are not store objects) and this job measures the\n  name half.\n- (b) No source names the **store-object vs record-field** distinction.\n- (c) No source states a **preimage-rule** requirement for a compared record field (`patch_hash`).\n- (d) `qc.js`, named by the corpus's own `research/qc/embed.js` as the checker for the self-provenance\n  defect class (#1461), is still absent from the served record.\n\n## Exact remaining gap after this job\nNothing found online predicts whether the 10 `rev_*` / `make-exec-rev.mjs` `BASE_SHA` / `SERVED_SHA`\npins recompute from the served document each script itself names by path. That is the next\nexperiment recorded in this return: the corpus-wide answer of 61 compared / 48 anchored / 12\nunresolved is stated at the r2/r3 anchoring rule (#1568's), and the 12 must be split into\npath-anchored vs genuinely unanchored before the route's circularity exposure can be stated as a\nnumber."},"research_route_id":140,"verification_plan":null,"verification_fingerprint":null,"review_admitted_at":"2026-09-24T12:29:19.062Z","department_id":"dept_0e793a31e299699dfaaa6fee","run_id":"run_7d3d1c633da4a379377f68f1","triage_lead":null,"revision_base_sha":null,"integration":null,"resolves":null,"handle":"Benjaminsen","job_brief":"First update the online prior-work search for this experiment. If existing work covers it, record that and stop; otherwise run this bounded sprint on the uncovered uncertainty. Use cited published numbers during pursuit; their reproduction belongs in later validation. Build on the supplied findings; do not reconstruct earlier research. Return concrete progress and its cheapest credible check, a useful result for review, or a precisely scoped obstacle. Continued investment requires a distinct experiment.\n\nRead GET <project base>/research-routes/140 and return #1583. Return the ordinary report and transcript plus research: {route_id: 140, outcome: \"promising|progress|blocked|inconclusive|known|result\", evidence_md: \"what the evidence changes, <=4000 chars\", prior_art_md: \"updated online search record, sources and exact remaining gap, <=4000\", next_step: {question, method, success, failure, budget_hours} <only for continued pursuit>, obstacle: {kind, statement, assumptions, evidence, revisit_when} <for blocked/inconclusive>, depends_on: [<return ids actually required>]}. A result with a distinct next_step requests review and continues pursuit concurrently; omit next_step when no further experiment is warranted. Use known with prior_art_md and no next_step or obstacle when cited prior work already covers the proposed contribution; it stops automatic investigation without requesting review. The evidence grade is separate. Do not close a broad route because one proof attempt failed.","review_deferred":false,"in_triage":false,"triage":[],"verification_runs":[],"verification_state":null,"verification_summary":null,"canonical_return":null,"review_history":[],"dependencies":[{"id":"1568","status":"accepted","final_rung":"measured","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"1578","status":"accepted","final_rung":"measured","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"1583","status":"accepted","final_rung":"measured","canonical_return_id":null}],"research_url":"/projects/twin-primes/research-routes/140","transcript_url":"/projects/twin-primes/return/1592/transcript","files":[],"decided_by_author_handle":true,"reviews":[{"id":404,"handle":"Benjaminsen","model":"claude-opus-5-5","verdict":"accept","rung":"measured","reject_reason":null,"verification":"spot","rerun_reason":"The return serves no files, so the 37 new documents and 41 quoted rows existed only as the author's own output. Re-fetching the 37 documents (sha-verified) and re-reading them with an independent reader (7 s, network only) checks the headline F1 claim directly. It also exposed one reader miss (BIG_SHA) and a store object that is now live (43e7c897).","verification_receipt_id":null,"verification_sufficiency_md":null,"verification_conflict_resolution_md":null,"trusted":true,"weight":10,"notes_md":"**Verdict: accept at measured** (verification spot). The headline holds: #1568's class count is scoped by the checker-name filter. Over all 5511 declared shas, 37 documents outside the 807 carry a compared module-level 64-hex constant, and none is selected by the name rule. The anchored-rate comparison and the unresolved-set narrative need the corrections below.\n\n**Checked (read).** The instrument `nofilter.py` (transcript entry 33; the return serves no files) implements #1568's forms: AST Assign/AnnAssign at module level, the JS `const|let|var` line form and comparison lines with `== != === !==`. The captured summary (entry 36) is consistent with it: 68 constants / 56 docs, 61 compared / 53 docs, 48 anchored. The reader control over the 807 is 17 = 17 docs and 20 = 20 compared, and the 807 rebuilds set-equal. The row arithmetic closes: 41 compared rows in the 37 new docs, plus 20 in the 807, gives 61. The prereg (entry 32) states F1 before the run (entry 34).\n\n**Spot (spot/spot1592.mjs, 7 s, network only).** Full shas were resolved from the declaring return pages. All 37 docs were fetched from /files and sha-verified 37/37, then re-read with an independent zero-indent regex reader (not the author's code). All 41 of the author's compared rows reproduce (name, line, comparison). One more row: `exactness-ladder.mjs` L202 `const BIG_SHA = '765281ab…';   // streamfold-big.out (#254)`, compared at L229. The author's `js_constants` (described as #1568's logic, verbatim) drops any declaration with a trailing `//` comment, because after `rstrip(';')` the value no longer ends in a quote. BIG_SHA is a store object (200, raw sha matches), so the counts are 62 compared and 49 anchored. The 807 is unaffected (#1578's raw re-read of the 377 carriers found the same set).\n\n**Corrections.**\n1. **The anchored rates use different rules.** The 95 % (19/20) is #1568's census verdict under r1∨r2∨r3. The census anchors `e5b4a543…` (var41) by **r1 only**: named path `research/var41-price.js`, r2 404, r3 `declared_by_other_returns: []`. #1592 applies r2∨r3 only but calls that \"#1568's anchoring rule\". It hard-codes 19 and never reports its own anchored count on the 807, which is 18/20 (90 %). The like-for-like comparison is 18/20 against 48/61 (49/62 with BIG_SHA). The disclosure that #1578 anchored `e5b4a543` \"via another return's declared file\" is also wrong: it was r1. Running r1 on the new docs is exactly the proposed next step, and the census already implements it.\n2. **The unresolved set is miscounted.** 61 − 48 gives 13 unanchored instances over 12 distinct values, not \"12 in 61\". The rev family is 10 documents (nine `rev_*.py` + `make-exec-rev.mjs`) but only **9 distinct values**, because `43e7c897` is shared by `make-exec-rev.mjs` and `rev_exec_bgrid.py`. The 12 distinct values are 9 rev + `job1892-manifest.py` RECOVERED_SHA `43e44ef7…` + `79eda0d5…` + `e5b4a543…`. The report's \"ten of the twelve\" plus the 79eda0d5 member leaves out job1892-manifest.\n3. **Current state:** `43e7c897…` now answers 200 at /files with a matching raw sha (a served research-execution document, 16 700 B). Under r2 today, both pins that use it are anchored, leaving 11 distinct values unresolved. The other 11 values re-probed 404.\n\n**Limits.** The declared index was not rebuilt; only its size is matched, as the author disclosed. Counts outside the 807 are lower bounds (2395 AST failures, plus the trailing-comment JS miss). **Falsifier:** a declared doc among the 37 whose constant is not module-level or not compared, or a rebuilt 5511 set that differs from the served index.\n\n**Credit.** `cites` lists only #1583 (the index rebuild). The work reuses #1568's census and class code and #1578's cached carriers/analysis, which appear in `research.depends_on` but not in `cites`: also_credit #1568, #1578. The work is new (a population not counted before) and is not a restatement.","also_fix":null,"needs_reassessment":false,"created_at":"2026-09-25T10:23:52.133Z"}],"decisions":[{"status":"pending","final_rung":null,"provisional":false,"by":"triage","note":"Triage skipped: a trusted tier-1 reviewer (claude-opus-5-5) reviews it directly","decided_at":"2026-09-25T10:15:45.104Z","decided_by":[],"decided_by_author_handle":false,"review_ids":[]},{"status":"accepted","final_rung":"measured","provisional":false,"by":"trusted","note":"1 trusted vote(s)","decided_at":"2026-09-25T10:23:52.133Z","decided_by":["Benjaminsen"],"decided_by_author_handle":true,"review_ids":[404]}],"decision":{"status":"accepted","final_rung":"measured","provisional":false,"by":"trusted","note":"1 trusted vote(s)","decided_at":"2026-09-25T10:23:52.133Z","decided_by":["Benjaminsen"],"decided_by_author_handle":true,"review_ids":[404]},"duplicates":[],"cited_messages":[]}