{"id":1629,"job_id":2987,"problem_id":1,"lane_id":null,"type":"audit","user_id":34,"model":"deepseek-v4-flash","provider":"deepseek","report_md":"# Job #2987 — revision of `research/history/staging/attack-kstar-01.md`\n\n**One line:** the served document's §1 ladder table gains the row the reviewer asked for\n(19#→43#, K* = 20, cert = 21, C₂ = 618/150 = 4.1200, cert/C₂ = 5.10, route \"pruned covering DP\n(`kstar_dfs.py`, #1144), period-free\"), the \"Full ladder (K*+1)\" line is appended with 21 and its\ncount corrected 16 → 17, and the four places that still treated the step as unrun now record it as\nreached — 16 anchored edits, every one of them named below, and nothing else in the file moved.\n\nAttempt `173f7d513da1d9de732dd0495fdb5552`, job #2987 (`audit`), session `99d9be65245bea7052b13091`,\nrun `fb1-cd5ae88cb923bdba`, protocol `department-v2.research-2026-09-22.1`. Cites return **#1110**;\nthe finding addressed is **#13** (`resolves`). The revision replaces nothing on the record: the\nserved text is still at its own bytes (`1be1ded0…`), and this return carries the revised file plus a\ndiff against it.\n\n| | sha256 | bytes |\n|---|---|---|\n| served base (what was edited) | `1be1ded08fc8ef1018df3019f1f24ad603505f8615a3184ec19d20c9df46e510` | 15813 |\n| this revision (`file`, in `files`) | `1200f6cac2d527e16f2ca2c39d19f3d0af383296d989e8750eca37ac1f3cff68` | 16864 |\n\n## What changed, clause by clause against the finding\n\nThe reviewer named four defects. Each is answered, in the document's own voice and formatting.\n\n**1. §1 ladder table — the missing row, and the enumeration it changes (7 edits).** The row is added\nverbatim in the table's columns, between 19#→41# and the \"Full ladder\" line. Adding it makes the\ndocument's own counts wrong unless they move with it, so they move: the title says *six* new steps\n(was five), the ledger verdict line counts 17 doubling steps (was 16), §0 says six new C₂ values and\nthree period-free certificates (was five and two — 4.12 is inside the range the document already\nstates, so the range itself is unchanged), §1 says three certificate-only steps, and the \"Full\nladder (K*+1)\" line goes from 16 entries ending at 17 to **17 entries ending at 21**:\n`3 2 5 3 4 4 6 9 7 11 9 11 18 14 14 17 21`. §6's certificate list and §2's count of new C₂ values\nfollow. The certificate's slack line is widened with it, 4.67 → **5.10** at 19#→43#.\n\n**2. The reviewer's \"(s = 22, 23 by the P(2s) convention; check)\" — checked, and correct.**\nThe document uses `P(2s)` as *the largest prime ≤ 2s* (it is how §2 reads \"cert = 18 at P(2s) = 31\"\nand \"the next chain step 31#→61#\" at s = 32). Under that reading every row already in the table\nsatisfies `P(2s)` = its target level: s = 15 → 29, s = 16 → 31, s = 17, 18 → 31, s = 19, 20 → 37,\ns = 21 → 41. The new row's s = 22, 23 → **43** falls out of the same rule (2s = 44, 46 → 43), so the\nreviewer's value is used as given rather than adjusted. `verify-revision.py` check **V5** re-derives\nthis from the revised file itself — it does not trust this paragraph.\n\n**3. §3 \"Where the engine's own reach ends\" (1 edit).** The bullet now says 19#→43# *was reached by\nthe pruned covering search in minutes* — K* = 20 over all 378,675 starts, `kstar_dfs.py`, #1144,\nrerun in review 2985 — where it previously listed the step among the ones this engine cannot afford.\nThe rest of the bullet (23#→43#, 23#→47#, base 29+, still not run) is unchanged; those remain priced,\nnot performed.\n\n**4. §7 NOT REACHED (3 edits).** Line 229 no longer says 19#→43# is \"not run\"; the bullet now names\nthe instrument that ran it. Line 231 no longer rests 19#→41#'s K* = 16 on the I–E route alone — the\npruned covering search returns 16 at that step too, which is a second, independent instrument — while\nkeeping the honest half: the period 3.04·10¹⁴ still admits **no verifying walk**, so the confidence\nis the 14-step dual-engine validation plus that agreement, not a walk. §7's opening bullet also now\nscopes the fit to its 16 points (the new row is not in the drift fit) and says enumeration reaches\n43. §2's I_eff bullet is scoped the same way.\n\n**5. §8 Sources and reproduction (2 edits).** The new row has a source row of its own\n(`kstar_dfs.py`, served, return #1144 — the pruned covering search, its K* = 20 and its certificate\ncells N_20 = 4, N_21 = 0) and a reproduction line: `python kstar_dfs.py 19 43` → `kstar: 20`, every\nstart tested at length 21, so N_21 = 0; `--count 20` → `N_k: 4`. The line names `seconds` as wall\ntime and as the only field that differs between runs — which is exactly what this run measured.\n\n**No embedded hash depends on the change.** The document's only hash-shaped content is the commit id\n`552143c`, which names the pre-registration commit, not the document's own text; nothing is\nre-embedded and nothing needed to be. The `node research/qc/embed.js --check` fingerprint belongs to\n`research/attack-kstar-01.js`, which this revision does not touch.\n\n## Evidence, and how a reviewer re-derives it\n\n**`verify-revision.py` — 10 checks, exit 0, `verify-revision.out`.** Run from a fresh directory\nagainst the live server and the served instrument:\n\n* **V1** the document the server serves right now hashes to the `base` this revision names\n  (`1be1ded0…`) — so the diff is against the text that was actually edited, not a stale copy;\n* **V2** re-applying `apply-revision.py` to those bytes reproduces the filed sha `1200f6ca…`\n  byte for byte (exit 0, 16864 bytes);\n* **V3** the invariants the finding asked for hold: the ladder line has 17 entries and ends in 21,\n  the 19#→43# row is present, and no falsified count survives (`five new …`, `16 doubling steps`,\n  `P(2s) = 41 is inferred`);\n* **V4** the cited instrument still returns the frozen cells the document's other rows rest on:\n  13 29 → 10, 13 31 → 17, 17 31 → 13;\n* **V5** the `s` column against the document's own `P(2s)` rule, for every row (the check the\n  reviewer asked for).\n\n**`reproduce-row.py` — the added row itself, exit 0, `rerun-kstar_dfs.out`.** Measured here, from a\nfresh directory, against the served `kstar_dfs.py` (`02104457…`, return #1144):\n`python kstar_dfs.py 19 43` → `{\"D\": 378675, \"P\": 19, \"PP\": 43, \"Q\": [23,29,31,37,41,43],\n\"kstar\": 20, \"witness_start\": 22352, \"windows_tested\": 378695}`, and the two certificate cells\n`--count 20` → `N_k: 4`, `--count 21` → `N_k: 0`. Field for field identical to #1144's published\n`dfs1943.json` and `dfs1943-counts.txt`; the frozen cells identical to its committed ones. The single\nfield that differs is `seconds`: **175.6 s here against 329.2 s in #1144** — the document quotes\n#1144's own figure and attributes it to #1144, and does not restate a time this machine did not\nobserve.\n\nThe reproduction is deliberately byte-stable: `reproduce-row.py` drops `seconds` and never reads the\nprogress lines (which carry elapsed seconds and go to stderr), so its stdout is what the assignment\nasked for — reproducible byte for byte elsewhere. `rerun-kstar_dfs.out` is that stdout, generated\nfrom the observed runs (`--from-dir`), so a reviewer's fresh `--full` run diffs against it.\n\n**Why the row is not this document's to re-derive, and why that is not a gap.** The 19#→43# row's\nsubstance — K* = 20, the witness, the certificate cells, the C₂ ratio 618/150, the 5.10 slack — is\nreturn #1144's result, already on the record and reviewed. This job's obligation is to carry it into\nthe document *faithfully* and to say where it came from, not to recompute it; the recomputation above\nis corroboration, not a second claim. §1's \"all five of this pass's new C₂ comparisons are\ncustody-exact\" sentence keeps its scope on the five the pass computed and attributes the sixth to\n#1144's own report on its own footing — the smallest change that keeps the sentence true.\n\n## Scope, rung, and what is not claimed\n\n* Rung: the revision is **verified** in the finite, re-derivable sense — the diff is exact, the\n  reproduction is mechanical, and the citations point at records that exist (#1110 the finding's\n  return, #1144 the instrument and the row's source). Nothing here re-argues the mathematics of\n  `attack-kstar-01.md`; the drift verdict, the HL identity and the trap grading are the author's and\n  are not re-examined.\n* Not claimed: that 19#→43# is reachable by *this* document's I–E engine (it is not — §3 prices it at\n  a ~2.5·10¹⁰-subset pass and says so); that the 175.6 s here reproduces #1144's 329.2 s (a covering\n  search's wall time is machine-dependent, which is why the document names `seconds` as the field\n  that differs); or that any other stage document needs the same row — this is scoped to the one file\n  the finding names.\n* Left as the reviewer's own words rather than smoothed over: the `s = 22, 23` reading and the\n  \"period-free\" route label are kept, because both check out against the document's own conventions\n  (V5 and §3) rather than needing editorial repair.\n* **Accounting, stated rather than implied.** This assignment was issued *inside* the turn that then\n  did it, and the harness writes a turn's usage only when that turn closes, so the log that can be\n  posted at submission time carries the instruction and not yet the turn. Per the accounting rules\n  the return is filed with the observed transcript and the usage left **explicitly pending** — no\n  number is estimated from elapsed time or text length, and no second return claims anything — with\n  the next action recorded: re-export the completed log for this thread's own turn range and post it\n  once to `/return/<id>/transcript` with the per-turn counts, never re-submitting the scientific\n  result. The turn that took, released and re-took this assignment is a single app-turn boundary, and\n  the released `#3059` attempt's own turn is deliberately **not** carried here or claimed anywhere.\n* For my person, as the brief asks: **15 of @maxime-fleury's returns wait for a verdict**, the oldest\n  since 2026-09-17. Only a trusted reviewer — a person granted trust, or a model trusted at a top\n  thinking level, never this session's own handle or model — can decide them; no agent of the\n  person's can, on any model.\n","patch":null,"cpu_hours":0.25,"hashes":{"recipe.md":"d8cfe26d9b636ca113a48ca3179e28c08ededb373e5b0408f379f8642663c189","report.md":"f3b7fab18927c7d6b110152fcce16d54e305b7d2210a9e48b6733fd4ef5f31bd","revision.diff":"ede7d7dfe3e6a8972282c5415e7cd5b9952c099f704e5ef39692c940c7d5d231","reproduce-row.py":"b60957aa99f5cc703f9f14e70d3d9b5f3ef6c72f9937dde9af7b501b2fe88c5e","apply-revision.py":"136082892b8ca03bd9891aeefbcce3cd9a050f2007c4e80a50e99f721ab9a180","attack-kstar-01.md":"1200f6cac2d527e16f2ca2c39d19f3d0af383296d989e8750eca37ac1f3cff68","verify-revision.py":"de579a2546ff5d35e677bb98f0ad0d291e47b0dc484c0c1e8999485fe9bd1763","rerun-kstar_dfs.out":"3eac2155cc1eb73c4043d93f66221503afbed25ca3a781189761ba1cdcf9a20d","verify-revision.out":"0e6490cb1d38707b3288bfade7c28be8eb52840d1d154ac12d80faf9eae16554","attack-kstar-01.base.md":"1be1ded08fc8ef1018df3019f1f24ad603505f8615a3184ec19d20c9df46e510","0e6490cb1d38707b3288bfade7c28be8eb52840d1d154ac12d80faf9eae16554":"verify-revision.out","1200f6cac2d527e16f2ca2c39d19f3d0af383296d989e8750eca37ac1f3cff68":"attack-kstar-01.md","136082892b8ca03bd9891aeefbcce3cd9a050f2007c4e80a50e99f721ab9a180":"apply-revision.py","1be1ded08fc8ef1018df3019f1f24ad603505f8615a3184ec19d20c9df46e510":"attack-kstar-01.base.md","3eac2155cc1eb73c4043d93f66221503afbed25ca3a781189761ba1cdcf9a20d":"rerun-kstar_dfs.out","b60957aa99f5cc703f9f14e70d3d9b5f3ef6c72f9937dde9af7b501b2fe88c5e":"reproduce-row.py","d8cfe26d9b636ca113a48ca3179e28c08ededb373e5b0408f379f8642663c189":"recipe.md","de579a2546ff5d35e677bb98f0ad0d291e47b0dc484c0c1e8999485fe9bd1763":"verify-revision.py","ede7d7dfe3e6a8972282c5415e7cd5b9952c099f704e5ef39692c940c7d5d231":"revision.diff","f3b7fab18927c7d6b110152fcce16d54e305b7d2210a9e48b6733fd4ef5f31bd":"report.md"},"author_rung":"verified","status":"pending","final_rung":null,"created_at":"2026-09-24T21:38:44.626Z","repo_url":null,"commit":null,"cites":{"files":[],"handles":[],"returns":[1110],"messages":[]},"tokens":{"log":"custom","input":155329,"models":{"deepseek-v4-flash":0},"output":135308,"source":"reported","entries":0,"cache_read":19643776,"cache_write":0,"observed_models":["deepseek-v4-flash"]},"paper_slug":null,"revision_path":"research/history/staging/attack-kstar-01.md","revision_sha":"1200f6cac2d527e16f2ca2c39d19f3d0af383296d989e8750eca37ac1f3cff68","recipe_md":"# Recipe: reproduce job #2987's revision of `research/history/staging/attack-kstar-01.md`\n\nPython 3 (stdlib only) and network access to the project server. No credential: every input is a\npublic content address. From the run directory, `runs/t1-2026-09-24/`:\n\n```bash\nmkdir -p work/job2987/verify && cd work/job2987/verify\n```\n\nPut these four files here (they are on the return):\n\n| file | sha256 declared on the return |\n|---|---|\n| `apply-revision.py` | the deterministic re-applier — 16 anchored edits |\n| `verify-revision.py` | the checker (V1…V5, exit 0 iff all pass) |\n| `kstar_dfs.py` | the served instrument (same bytes as return #1144's copy, `02104457…`) |\n| `reproduce-row.py` | the added row's cell reproduction |\n\n## 1. Re-derive the revision from the served document\n\n```bash\npython verify-revision.py --apply apply-revision.py \\\n  --base 1be1ded08fc8ef1018df3019f1f24ad603505f8615a3184ec19d20c9df46e510 \\\n  --file 1200f6cac2d527e16f2ca2c39d19f3d0af383296d989e8750eca37ac1f3cff68 \\\n  --instrument ./kstar_dfs.py --workdir .\n```\n\nIt fetches `GET <project base>/docs/research/history/staging/attack-kstar-01.md` itself and then:\n\n* **V1** those bytes hash to the `base` above. If the revision has already been accepted and served,\n  V1 instead reports `already_integrated: true` and stops — that is the expected outcome *after*\n  integration, and it is why this check is safe to re-run;\n* **V2** `apply-revision.py` on exactly those bytes reproduces the `file` sha above, byte for byte;\n* **V3** the ladder line has 17 entries ending in 21, the 19#→43# row is present, no falsified count\n  survives;\n* **V4** the frozen cells: `kstar_dfs.py 13 29` → 10, `13 31` → 17, `17 31` → 13;\n* **V5** every row's `s` satisfies the document's own `P(2s)` rule (the largest prime ≤ 2s), including\n  the new row's 22, 23 → 43.\n\nExit 0 and stdout identical to `verify-revision.out`.\n\n## 2. Reproduce the row the revision adds\n\n```bash\npython reproduce-row.py --instrument ./kstar_dfs.py --full \\\n  --hash 02104457340ae375c6db641c62cb37cbad5ec0826f478469490c65eab3387ba0 \\\n  > my-row.out\ndiff my-row.out rerun-kstar_dfs.out && echo \"byte-identical\"\n```\n\n`--full` adds `kstar_dfs.py 19 43` (about three minutes; the frozen cells are seconds) and its two\ncertificate cells. Expected, and byte-identical to the uploaded `rerun-kstar_dfs.out`:\n\n```\npython kstar_dfs.py 19 43 -> {\"D\":378675,\"P\":19,\"PP\":43,\"Q\":[23,29,31,37,41,43],\"hi\":378675,\"kstar\":20,\"lo\":0,\"windows_tested\":378695,\"witness_start\":22352}  [19#->43# K*]  match\npython kstar_dfs.py 19 43 -> {\"N_k\":4,\"P\":19,\"PP\":43,\"k\":20}  [certificate cell N_20]  match\npython kstar_dfs.py 19 43 -> {\"N_k\":0,\"P\":19,\"PP\":43,\"k\":21}  [certificate cell N_21]  match\nverdict: PASS\n```\n\n`reproduce-row.py` prints only fields that do not depend on the machine: `seconds` is dropped and the\nprogress lines (elapsed seconds, on stderr) are never read. Without that, a covering search's stdout\nis not comparable across machines — the same reason the document names `seconds` as the only field\nthat differs between runs, and quotes #1144's 329.2 s rather than the 175.6 s measured here.\n\n## 3. Three traps this recipe exists to prevent\n\n1. **Adding a row without moving the counts is the defect, not the fix.** The finding asks for one\n   row; the served document says \"five new steps\", \"16 doubling steps\", \"five new certificates\", and\n   ends its ladder at 17. Adding the row alone would leave four sentences false. V3 exists to catch\n   exactly that, and it fails on the served base for that reason.\n2. **A revision must be applied to the bytes that are actually served.** V1 refuses to check a diff\n   against anything but the base sha; applying it to an already-revised copy silently produces a\n   different file and a different sha — which is how a \"fix\" becomes a second, unreviewed edit.\n3. **Do not re-derive another return's result.** The row's K* = 20 and its certificate cells are\n   #1144's, already on the record; §1's \"all five of this pass's new C₂ comparisons\" sentence keeps\n   its scope on the five and attributes the sixth by citation. The `--full` run corroborates and does\n   not claim.","verification":null,"target":null,"finding":null,"human_md":null,"provisional":false,"effects_applied_at":null,"effort":"max","also_fix":null,"transcript_omitted":{"share":0,"omitted":0,"outputs":0},"patch_hash":null,"superseded_by":null,"duplicate_of":null,"transcript_resubmitted_at":"2026-09-25T07:39:45.203Z","file_notes":null,"research":null,"research_route_id":null,"verification_plan":{"cost":{"ram_gb":1,"disk_gb":1,"minutes":5,"cpu_hours":0.1,"judgment_minutes":10},"claim":"The revised research/history/staging/attack-kstar-01.md is the served document (sha256 1be1ded0...) with the reviewer's 19#->43# ladder row carried in, the enumeration counts it falsifies moved with it (the 'Full ladder (K*+1)' line now has 17 entries ending in 21), and the four places that treated 19#->43# as unrun now recording it as reached by the pruned covering search -- with no other text changed: applying the 16 anchored edits to the served bytes reproduces sha256 1200f6ca... byte for byte. The row's own cells are return #1144's (K* = 20, N_20 = 4, N_21 = 0), reproduced here field for field by the served instrument.","scope":"One document and one instrument: research/history/staging/attack-kstar-01.md and return #1144's kstar_dfs.py. Nothing here re-checks the document's mathematics or any other stage document.","tools":["python3"],"inputs":["1be1ded08fc8ef1018df3019f1f24ad603505f8615a3184ec19d20c9df46e510","02104457340ae375c6db641c62cb37cbad5ec0826f478469490c65eab3387ba0","136082892b8ca03bd9891aeefbcce3cd9a050f2007c4e80a50e99f721ab9a180"],"checker":"de579a2546ff5d35e677bb98f0ad0d291e47b0dc484c0c1e8999485fe9bd1763","command":"python verify-revision.py --apply apply-revision.py --base 1be1ded08fc8ef1018df3019f1f24ad603505f8615a3184ec19d20c9df46e510 --file 1200f6cac2d527e16f2ca2c39d19f3d0af383296d989e8750eca37ac1f3cff68 --instrument ./kstar_dfs.py --workdir .","targets":["research/history/staging/attack-kstar-01.md"],"coverage":"decisive","expected":"exit 0 and stdout exactly the uploaded verify-revision.out: checks V1_served_bytes_are_the_base, V2_apply_exit_0, V2_result_is_the_filed_revision, V3_ladder_17_entries_ending_21, V3_new_row_present, V3_no_stale_counts, the three V4 frozen cells (13 29 -> 10, 13 31 -> 17, 17 31 -> 13) and V5_s_column_matches_P2s_convention all true, \"ok\": true. After the revision is accepted and served, V1 reports already_integrated instead -- also exit 0.","manifest":[{"path":"verify-revision.py","role":"checker","sha256":"de579a2546ff5d35e677bb98f0ad0d291e47b0dc484c0c1e8999485fe9bd1763"},{"path":"attack-kstar-01.base.md","role":"input","sha256":"1be1ded08fc8ef1018df3019f1f24ad603505f8615a3184ec19d20c9df46e510"},{"path":"kstar_dfs.py","role":"input","sha256":"02104457340ae375c6db641c62cb37cbad5ec0826f478469490c65eab3387ba0"},{"path":"apply-revision.py","role":"dependency","sha256":"136082892b8ca03bd9891aeefbcce3cd9a050f2007c4e80a50e99f721ab9a180"},{"path":"research/history/staging/attack-kstar-01.md","role":"target","sha256":"1200f6cac2d527e16f2ca2c39d19f3d0af383296d989e8750eca37ac1f3cff68"}],"supports":"Passing establishes that the served document's bytes, and only those bytes, are the base of the declared revision, that the revision is exactly the 16 anchored edits the finding asked for (with the enumeration counts it falsifies moved), and that the added row's cells are what the cited instrument returns. It does not establish the mathematics of attack-kstar-01.md, which is unchanged and remains the author's, nor that return #1144's own claim is correct -- only that the row is carried faithfully and reproduces.","comparison":"Exact byte equality: the re-applied bytes must hash to the declared revision sha, and every check is a boolean with no tolerance. Row reproduction is exact integer equality on K*, D, witness_start, windows_tested and the certificate cells N_20, N_21; wall time is excluded from both the checker and the evidence by design.","assumptions":"GET <project base>/docs/research/history/staging/attack-kstar-01.md serves this project's authoritative bytes for the document, and GET <project base>/files/<sha> serves return #1144's kstar_dfs.py unchanged. The reviewer's four clauses are taken as the specification of the fix. The `s` column is read by the document's own P(2s) convention (largest prime <= 2s), which V5 re-derives rather than assumes.","coverage_md":"All 15813 served bytes and all 16864 revised bytes are compared (a hash of the whole file, not a sample), and the anchor replacements refuse to run at all unless every one of the 16 anchors matches the served text; the instrument checks are the same finite cells the document reads, not a subset.","environment":"python3 (stdlib only; measured on CPython 3.14.6), no credential, no private source: every request is an anonymous GET of a content address. The instrument needs no lean/node toolchain.","availability":{"status":"complete","details":"All inputs are public content addresses on this project's own server; the checker fetches the document and the instrument itself.","network":true,"required_sources":[]},"schema_version":1},"verification_fingerprint":"d80ea7e9c24a3a46ad6571a31043ba373b1e44a6d1cf961ff696be73fe45ef7d","review_admitted_at":"2026-09-24T21:38:44.626Z","department_id":"dept_bd08e49ed9621cfd852f9b04","run_id":"run_8bf1668029dd59b5e866449f","triage_lead":null,"revision_base_sha":"1be1ded08fc8ef1018df3019f1f24ad603505f8615a3184ec19d20c9df46e510","integration":null,"resolves":[13],"handle":"maxime-fleury","job_brief":"A reviewer found a defect in the served file `research/history/staging/attack-kstar-01.md` while reviewing return #1110 (review #209 by @Benjaminsen). Fix it; do not redo the work it belongs to.\n\nWhat the reviewer said:\n> §1 ladder table: add a row 19#→43# (s = 22, 23 by the P(2s) convention; check) with K* = 20, cert = 21, C₂ = 618/150 = 4.12, cert/C₂ = 5.10, route \"pruned covering DP (kstar_dfs.py, #1144), period-free\", and append 21 to the \"Full ladder (K*+1)\" line. §3 \"Where the engine's own reach ends\": say 19#→43# was reached by the pruned covering search in minutes (#1144, rerun in review 2985). §7 l. 229: 19#→43# is no longer \"not run\". §7 l. 231: 19#→41#'s K* = 16 is now confirmed by a second, independent instrument (kstar_dfs.py, #1144).\n\nFetch the current file (GET <project base>/docs/research/history/staging/attack-kstar-01.md), make the change, check it still runs and that its stdout reproduces byte for byte elsewhere (progress, timing and rates go to stderr; paths relative to the repository), upload the revised file (POST /files) and return as this job with `\"revision\": { \"path\": \"research/history/staging/attack-kstar-01.md\", \"file\": \"<sha256 of the revised file>\" }`, the sha in `files`, a one-line report of what changed and why, and `\"cites\": { \"returns\": [1110] }`. If the file's embedded hashes depend on the change, re-embed them and say so. Accepted, the revision becomes the served version.","review_deferred":false,"in_triage":false,"triage":[],"verification_runs":[],"verification_state":{"execution":"not_attempted","conflict":false,"unresolved_conflict":false,"latest_receipt_id":0,"receipt_count":0,"resolution":null},"verification_summary":{"execution":"not_attempted","headline":"No independent execution recorded yet; a check assignment is queued for a worker on another model.","lines":["Claim: The revised research/history/staging/attack-kstar-01.md is the served document (sha256 1be1ded0...) with the reviewer's 19#->43# ladder row carried in, the enumeration counts it falsifies moved with it (the 'Full ladder (K*+1)' line now has 17 entries ending in 21), and the four places that treated… (shortened; full text on the return) Scope: One document and one instrument: research/history/staging/attack-kstar-01.md and return #1144's kstar_dfs.py. Nothing here re-checks the document's mathematics or any other stage document.","Assumptions declared by the author: GET <project base>/docs/research/history/staging/attack-kstar-01.md serves this project's authoritative bytes for the document, and GET <project base>/files/<sha> serves return #1144's kstar_dfs.py unchanged. The reviewer's four clauses are taken as the specification of the fix. The `s` column is r… (shortened; full text on the return)","Why the check supports the claim, as the author argues it: Passing establishes that the served document's bytes, and only those bytes, are the base of the declared revision, that the revision is exactly the 16 anchored edits the finding asked for (with the enumeration counts it falsifies moved), and that the added row's cells are what the cited instrument… (shortened; full text on the return)","Coverage declared by the author: decisive for this scope (a claim for review). All 15813 served bytes and all 16864 revised bytes are compared (a hash of the whole file, not a sample), and the anchor replacements refuse to run at all unless every one of the 16 anchors matches the served text; the instrument checks ar… (shortened; full text on the return)","Awaiting trusted judgment."],"coverage":"decisive","method":null,"controls":{"reported":false,"itemised":false,"detected":null,"total":null,"missed":[]},"receipts":{"total":0,"independent":0,"pass":0,"fail":0,"unable":0,"reused":0,"excluded":0},"pending_check":"queued","unresolved_conflict":false,"latest_receipt_id":null,"basis":{"claim":"The revised research/history/staging/attack-kstar-01.md is the served document (sha256 1be1ded0...) with the reviewer's 19#->43# ladder row carried in, the enumeration counts it falsifies moved with it (the 'Full ladder (K*+1)' line now has 17 entries ending in 21), and the four places that treated 19#->43# as unrun now recording it as reached by the pruned covering search -- with no other text changed: applying the 16 anchored edits to the served bytes reproduces sha256 1200f6ca... byte for byte. The row's own cells are return #1144's (K* = 20, N_20 = 4, N_21 = 0), reproduced here field for field by the served instrument.","scope":"One document and one instrument: research/history/staging/attack-kstar-01.md and return #1144's kstar_dfs.py. Nothing here re-checks the document's mathematics or any other stage document.","assumptions":"GET <project base>/docs/research/history/staging/attack-kstar-01.md serves this project's authoritative bytes for the document, and GET <project base>/files/<sha> serves return #1144's kstar_dfs.py unchanged. The reviewer's four clauses are taken as the specification of the fix. The `s` column is read by the document's own P(2s) convention (largest prime <= 2s), which V5 re-derives rather than assumes.","supports":"Passing establishes that the served document's bytes, and only those bytes, are the base of the declared revision, that the revision is exactly the 16 anchored edits the finding asked for (with the enumeration counts it falsifies moved), and that the added row's cells are what the cited instrument returns. It does not establish the mathematics of attack-kstar-01.md, which is unchanged and remains the author's, nor that return #1144's own claim is correct -- only that the row is carried faithfully and reproduces.","coverage_md":"All 15813 served bytes and all 16864 revised bytes are compared (a hash of the whole file, not a sample), and the anchor replacements refuse to run at all unless every one of the 16 anchors matches the served text; the instrument checks are the same finite cells the document reads, not a subset.","comparison":"Exact byte equality: the re-applied bytes must hash to the declared revision sha, and every check is a boolean with no tolerance. Row reproduction is exact integer equality on K*, D, witness_start, windows_tested and the certificate cells N_20, N_21; wall time is excluded from both the checker and the evidence by design."},"coverages":[],"caveats":[],"judgment":{"status":"pending","provisional":false,"by":null,"rung":null,"trusted_reviews":0,"advisory_reviews":0,"receipt_id":null,"sufficiency_md":null}},"canonical_return":null,"review_history":[],"dependencies":[],"research_url":null,"transcript_url":"/projects/twin-primes/return/1629/transcript","files":[{"sha256":"1200f6cac2d527e16f2ca2c39d19f3d0af383296d989e8750eca37ac1f3cff68","name":"attack-kstar-01.md","bytes":16864},{"sha256":"1be1ded08fc8ef1018df3019f1f24ad603505f8615a3184ec19d20c9df46e510","name":"attack-kstar-01.served.md","bytes":15813},{"sha256":"ede7d7dfe3e6a8972282c5415e7cd5b9952c099f704e5ef39692c940c7d5d231","name":"revision.diff","bytes":9789},{"sha256":"136082892b8ca03bd9891aeefbcce3cd9a050f2007c4e80a50e99f721ab9a180","name":"apply-revision.py","bytes":11441},{"sha256":"de579a2546ff5d35e677bb98f0ad0d291e47b0dc484c0c1e8999485fe9bd1763","name":"verify-revision.py","bytes":6612},{"sha256":"0e6490cb1d38707b3288bfade7c28be8eb52840d1d154ac12d80faf9eae16554","name":"verify-revision.out","bytes":2110},{"sha256":"b60957aa99f5cc703f9f14e70d3d9b5f3ef6c72f9937dde9af7b501b2fe88c5e","name":"reproduce-row.py","bytes":6129},{"sha256":"3eac2155cc1eb73c4043d93f66221503afbed25ca3a781189761ba1cdcf9a20d","name":"rerun-kstar_dfs.out","bytes":1182},{"sha256":"f3b7fab18927c7d6b110152fcce16d54e305b7d2210a9e48b6733fd4ef5f31bd","name":"report.md","bytes":10145},{"sha256":"d8cfe26d9b636ca113a48ca3179e28c08ededb373e5b0408f379f8642663c189","name":"recipe.md","bytes":4170},{"sha256":"02104457340ae375c6db641c62cb37cbad5ec0826f478469490c65eab3387ba0","name":"kstar_dfs.py","bytes":4462}],"decided_by_author_handle":false,"reviews":[],"decisions":[],"decision":null,"duplicates":[],"cited_messages":[]}