{"id":1639,"job_id":3013,"problem_id":1,"lane_id":null,"type":"audit","user_id":34,"model":"deepseek-v4-flash","provider":"deepseek","report_md":"# Job #3013 — research/fold-profile-13-hotspot-sweep.js\n\n**One line.** Reading 4's six seam $z$ values now quote the values the embedded table prints\n($-1.42, -0.07, -0.13$ at T₁₉; $-0.68, +0.26, -0.53$ at T₂₃), the FIGURE PROVENANCE note records\nthat the six retired digits are the pre-2026-08-20 plain-multiply LCG's own output and not a\ndifferent draw, and the four grouped figures pin their locale so the pasted block reproduces byte\nfor byte on a host that does not group with commas. Revised bytes `2a370a98…` from served\n`0ebd5120…`.\n\n## What the reviewer found, and what the revision does about it\n\nThe finding (review #227 / return #1074, \"Reading 4\"): replace $z = -1.41, -0.19, -0.09$ (T₁₉) and\n$-0.65, +0.13, -0.50$ (T₂₃) with the embedded table's values, and add to FIGURE PROVENANCE that\nthe old values are the exact output of the pre-2026-08-20 plain-multiply LCG\n(`seed * 1103515245`), not a different random draw.\n\nFive anchored edits (`apply-revision.py` refuses unless every anchor matches the served text):\n\n1. **Reading 4, the six digits** — `-1.41, -0.19, -0.09` → `-1.42, -0.07, -0.13` and\n   `-0.65, +0.13, -0.50` → `-0.68, +0.26, -0.53`, from the block at lines 250–252 and 264–266.\n2. **Reading 4, the two digits that restate them** — the fusion sentence names the two extremes\n   ($-1.42$ at T₁₉ half-width 3,000, $+0.26$ at T₂₃ half-width 30,000), so it moves with them, plus\n   a two-line pointer to the provenance note for a reader who remembers the retired pair.\n3. **FIGURE PROVENANCE, a new paragraph** recording what the retired digits were, the exact\n   pre-2026-08-20 form $seed = (seed \\cdot 1103515245 + 12345) \\bmod 2^{31}$, why it is inexact from the\n   second call (the product passes $2^{53}$), that it reproduces all six digits exactly, that\n   today's `Math.imul` form is deterministic and prints the table's six, and that no verdict moves\n   (both LCGs put every seam inside 3 sd of the null).\n4. **Four grouped figures pin `toLocaleString('en-US')`** (see below).\n\n## The provenance claim, verified rather than asserted\n\n`reproduce-retired.py` (`reproduce-retired.out`) restores each candidate LCG form in a scratch copy\nof the served file and prints the two SEAMS blocks:\n\n| `rnd` form | T₁₉ | T₂₃ |\n|---|---|---|\n| `Math.imul` (served) | -1.42, -0.07, -0.13 | -0.68, 0.26, -0.53 |\n| `(seed*1103515245 + 12345) % 2**31` | **-1.41, -0.19, -0.09** | **-0.65, 0.13, -0.50** |\n| `% 0x80000000`, `% 2**31`, `& 0x7fffffff` | same six (the four spellings are one function) | same six |\n| `& 0xffffffff`, `% 2**32`, `| 0` | no seam block printed | no seam block printed |\n\nSo the retired row is the old LCG's own printed output, exactly as the reviewer says, and the\ncurrent row is the seeded `Math.imul` run's. (`+0.13` is the reading's sign convention; the table\nprints `0.13`.)\n\n## Second change, disclosed: the grouped figures were host-locale dependent\n\nThe assignment asks for stdout that \"reproduces byte for byte elsewhere\", and on this host it did\nnot. `T17: W = 510,510` is printed by a bare `toLocaleString()`, which follows the **host locale**,\nnot `LANG`: on this fr-FR machine it prints `510 510` (U+202F), and the gate says\n\n    out-sha256   DIFFERS — this run does not reproduce the pasted block\n\non the untouched served file. `embed.js`'s environment guard exempts `LANG`, which does not reach\nNode's default locale on Windows, so the exemption does not cover this. Pinning the four call sites\n(and only those four; no other printed byte is locale-dependent) fixes it:\n\n* `reproduce-block.base.out` — served file, this host: plain **does not reproduce**;\n  grouping pinned to en-US **matches** the recorded `out-sha256` `2f869b3a…`.\n* `reproduce-block.revised.out` — revision: plain **matches**, pinned **matches**.\n* `check-revised.out` — `node research/qc/embed.js --check` on the revision: **exit 0**,\n  `code-sha256 matches`, `body matches`, `out-sha256 matches`.\n\nThat is worse than cosmetic: a false `DIFFERS` on a file nobody touched is the class of gate the\ncorpus's own `verify-the-verifier-embeds.md` argues against. It is a separate change from the\nfinding, it is confined to four identifiers, and it can be dropped without touching the other four\nedits if the reviewer judges it out of scope for this job.\n\n## The re-embed\n\n`code-sha256` covers every byte above the OUTPUT banner, so the code change required the sanctioned\ntool (`--streams both`), and `reembed.diff` is its whole effect: `code-sha256` → `992248af…`,\n`body-lines: 86` added (the field the current writer records), `node:`/`embedded:`/`elapsed:`\nrefreshed to this run, and in the pasted body **only** the four timestamp lines\n(`done in 3.9s` → `4.6s`, the three `[TIME]` progress lines). Every content line is byte-identical,\nwhich the unchanged `out-sha256` `2f869b3a…` states and the four-line body hunk of\n`reembed.diff` shows.\n\n## Evidence\n\n| file | what it shows |\n|---|---|\n| `fold-profile-13-hotspot-sweep.js` | the filed revision, `2a370a98d97a84fdb6bd7aac58dc34fdc18e804aee5e3062ad5f9605e64c2114` |\n| `fold-profile-13-hotspot-sweep.base.js` | the served bytes the revision is measured against, `0ebd5120…` |\n| `revision.diff` / `reembed.diff` | base → pre-embed (the five anchors) and pre-embed → filed (the fingerprint refresh) |\n| `apply-revision.py` | the anchored fixer; refuses a non-served base or any anchor that does not match once |\n| `verify-revision.py` + `.out` | **13/13 checks, `ok: true`, exit 0** |\n| `reproduce-block.js` + `.out` | the locale evidence above |\n| `reproduce-retired.py` + `.out` | the LCG provenance table above |\n| `report.md`, `recipe.md` | this report and the run recipe |\n\n`verify-revision.py` re-derives its verdict from the returned bytes and the corpus's own tooling:\nV1 the declared served base, V2 the fixer reproduces the filed pre-embed bytes, V3 the base →\nrevision difference is exactly the declared anchors (the concatenated removed and added lines hash\nto frozen values, so a stray edit anywhere else fails even if the fixer were altered), V4\n`code-sha256` recomputed here from the bytes above the banner, `out-sha256` the frozen block hash,\nV5 the re-embed moved only fingerprint fields and timestamps, V6 reading 4's six values are read\nback out of the embedded block and compared, V7 the retired six appear nowhere in the block, V8 the\nprovenance note records them, V9 `embed.js --check` exits 0, V10 the block reproduces plain and\npinned, V11 the retired six reproduce from the old LCG.\n\n## Disclosed, not fixed\n\n* **The readings advisory moves 32 → 35 tokens** on this file. The three new ones are `1074` (the\n  return this audit cites), `1103515245` and `12345` (the LCG constants in the provenance note) —\n  records of what is deliberately *not* in the block, which is what the advisory counts. No token\n  leaves the list, and no reading figure newly becomes untraceable.\n* **Two other served documents quote the retired range and are now one digit stale each**:\n  `research/GLOSSARY.md` (\"puts the seams at z = −1.41 to +0.13 across T₁₉ and T₂₃\") and\n  `paper/moire-primes.md` (\"at T₁₉ and T₂₃ it puts the seams within −1.41 to +0.13 standard\n  deviations of the control mean\"). Both need `−1.41` → `−1.42` and `+0.13` → `+0.26` and nothing\n  else: the sentences around them already flag the two-tile fusion, and the extremes are still T₁₉\n  at half-width 3,000 and T₂₃ at 30,000. They are separate artifacts on this job's `revision.path`\n  and were not touched; this is the next step for whoever holds them.\n* **Usage of this assignment's turn is not claimable here.** It ran inside the turn that files it\n  (the harness writes an assistant row when the turn closes), and that same turn is the one return\n  #1637 records as pending usage — one turn's usage may be credited once, so this return claims\n  none. Recorded as a pending row with its next action, never estimated.\n\n## The queue, for @maxime-fleury\n\n16 of this handle's returns wait for a verdict, the oldest since 2026-09-18. Nothing for our person\nto do.\n","patch":null,"cpu_hours":0.05,"hashes":{"recipe.md":"5bd7e18dad3ffe175532b59a1ad1aa2308702fb21fdd44609e205c9043839763","report.md":"a18a8ce3b89a6fae77aa69f2c4e3b318d055397b6c0a047c0a4d187107ecd015","reembed.diff":"4f9e6c6c7d5b00c032323229aa089ed4c034b96291030b28df139f850cc8e5a7","revision.diff":"f23057059f20b4c4ef9432c1172943224476f3d9a4d500ab4de99e5e7623511d","apply-revision.py":"7181130cadc8bc90db1a449cd98ee8f46c25f1ef17a9209fb74d9004df54e548","reproduce-block.js":"7cf20956a8aea872b7d4a16e152e30db713ddf5bb68a0110f045424a3cdbc275","verify-revision.py":"985f8b74d703f19a9693fabf8cce70c0b525d3cd55fcc6e10dc24c5b03c31efa","reproduce-block.out":"e579458cf143aeeea75a41a18e3a6d1e14a7e27a529a7e606b4370bb4043a4b2","verify-revision.out":"856b9ed0dcadf88c2567198bbdcb540fd17d40671ca1b4b890ca3ca33791f890","reproduce-retired.py":"e1ab80e5834c3330ce95f0d64e9e8d9471330f64a6ad9518d603acb370bdf9f1","reproduce-retired.out":"a5dc9205816c33896d3a294c3c0e7ef985d4f910603c27f3dcfb05fab47db3be","fold-profile-13-hotspot-sweep.js":"2a370a98d97a84fdb6bd7aac58dc34fdc18e804aee5e3062ad5f9605e64c2114","fold-profile-13-hotspot-sweep.base.js":"0ebd512033257c82aca3130512fd917c239b81f0e23bcd25e7200d5c43472177","0ebd512033257c82aca3130512fd917c239b81f0e23bcd25e7200d5c43472177":"fold-profile-13-hotspot-sweep.base.js","2a370a98d97a84fdb6bd7aac58dc34fdc18e804aee5e3062ad5f9605e64c2114":"fold-profile-13-hotspot-sweep.js","4f9e6c6c7d5b00c032323229aa089ed4c034b96291030b28df139f850cc8e5a7":"reembed.diff","5bd7e18dad3ffe175532b59a1ad1aa2308702fb21fdd44609e205c9043839763":"recipe.md","7181130cadc8bc90db1a449cd98ee8f46c25f1ef17a9209fb74d9004df54e548":"apply-revision.py","7cf20956a8aea872b7d4a16e152e30db713ddf5bb68a0110f045424a3cdbc275":"reproduce-block.js","856b9ed0dcadf88c2567198bbdcb540fd17d40671ca1b4b890ca3ca33791f890":"verify-revision.out","985f8b74d703f19a9693fabf8cce70c0b525d3cd55fcc6e10dc24c5b03c31efa":"verify-revision.py","a18a8ce3b89a6fae77aa69f2c4e3b318d055397b6c0a047c0a4d187107ecd015":"report.md","a5dc9205816c33896d3a294c3c0e7ef985d4f910603c27f3dcfb05fab47db3be":"reproduce-retired.out","e1ab80e5834c3330ce95f0d64e9e8d9471330f64a6ad9518d603acb370bdf9f1":"reproduce-retired.py","e579458cf143aeeea75a41a18e3a6d1e14a7e27a529a7e606b4370bb4043a4b2":"reproduce-block.out","f23057059f20b4c4ef9432c1172943224476f3d9a4d500ab4de99e5e7623511d":"revision.diff"},"author_rung":"verified","status":"pending","final_rung":null,"created_at":"2026-09-24T23:20:31.352Z","repo_url":null,"commit":null,"cites":{"files":[],"handles":[],"returns":[1074],"messages":[]},"tokens":{"log":"custom","input":772001,"models":{"deepseek-v4-flash":0},"output":199775,"source":"reported","entries":0,"cache_read":36280704,"cache_write":0,"observed_models":["deepseek-v4-flash"]},"paper_slug":null,"revision_path":"research/fold-profile-13-hotspot-sweep.js","revision_sha":"2a370a98d97a84fdb6bd7aac58dc34fdc18e804aee5e3062ad5f9605e64c2114","recipe_md":"# Recipe — job #3013, every step from the served bytes\n\nPaths are relative to the repository root; nothing here needs a credential, and the only tools are\n`python3` (stdlib) and `node`. The served bytes are in this package as\n`fold-profile-13-hotspot-sweep.base.js` (`0ebd5120…`), so the whole revision is reproducible\noffline; to start from the store instead, fetch\n`GET <project base>/docs/research/fold-profile-13-hotspot-sweep.js` and check the sha.\n\nLay out the scratch tree the corpus paths expect (the sweep and the two QC modules it needs):\n\n```\nmkdir -p /tmp/f13/research/qc\ncp fold-profile-13-hotspot-sweep.base.js          /tmp/f13/research/fold-profile-13-hotspot-sweep.js\ncp <served research/qc/embed.js>                  /tmp/f13/research/qc/embed.js\ncp <served research/qc/tailfmt.js>                /tmp/f13/research/qc/tailfmt.js\n```\n\n**1. See the defect and the gate's own verdict on the served file.**\n\n```\ncd /tmp/f13\nnode research/qc/embed.js --check research/fold-profile-13-hotspot-sweep.js\n```\n\n`code-sha256 matches`, `body matches out-sha256`, then `out-sha256 DIFFERS` on this build (see step\n5 — it is the host locale, not the code), and the advisory lists the READINGS figures the block does\nnot carry.\n\n**2. Apply the revision.**\n\n```\ncd /tmp/f13\npython apply-revision.py --base research/fold-profile-13-hotspot-sweep.js \\\n                         --out  research/fold-profile-13-hotspot-sweep.rev.js --diff rev.diff\n```\n\nFive anchors, each required to match exactly once; it refuses a base whose sha is not `0ebd5120…`.\n`rev.diff` should equal `revision.diff` in this package, and the output sha should be\n`300f20fd…` (the pre-embed revision).\n\n**3. Re-embed, because the code above the banner changed.**\n\n```\ncp research/fold-profile-13-hotspot-sweep.rev.js research/fold-profile-13-hotspot-sweep.js\nnode research/qc/embed.js --streams both research/fold-profile-13-hotspot-sweep.js\ndiff <(# the pre-embed file) research/fold-profile-13-hotspot-sweep.js    # == reembed.diff\n```\n\n`out-sha256` must come out **unchanged** at `2f869b3a…`; that is the proof the pasted block is the\nsame run. What changes is `code-sha256`, the added `body-lines: 86`, `node:`/`embedded:`/`elapsed:`\nand the four timestamp lines of the body — nothing else.\n\n**4. The gate, now green.**\n\n```\nnode research/qc/embed.js --check research/fold-profile-13-hotspot-sweep.js   # exit 0\n```\n\n**5. Reproduce the locale finding on any non-comma host.** On a host whose default locale groups\nwith U+202F (fr-FR here), the *served* file fails step 1 for that reason alone:\n\n```\nnode reproduce-block.js --repo /tmp/f13 research/fold-profile-13-hotspot-sweep.js\n```\n\non the served bytes: `plain does not reproduce`, `grouping pinned to en-US MATCHES`. On the\nrevision both lines match. `reproduce-block.js` pins the grouping only in the child process\n(`node -r <temp shim>`); it never edits the tree.\n\n**6. The provenance claim.**\n\n```\npython reproduce-retired.py --served research/fold-profile-13-hotspot-sweep.base.js\n```\n\nEach candidate form of `rnd` is written into a scratch copy and the two SEAMS blocks are printed.\nThe `mod 2**31` family (four spellings) reproduces all six retired digits; the served `Math.imul`\nform reproduces the table's six; `& 0xffffffff`, `% 2**32` and `| 0` print no seam block at all.\n\n**7. The whole verdict.**\n\n```\npython verify-revision.py --file fold-profile-13-hotspot-sweep.js \\\n       --base fold-profile-13-hotspot-sweep.base.js \\\n       --apply apply-revision.py --retired reproduce-retired.py --repo /tmp/f13\n```\n\nExit 0 and stdout identical to `verify-revision.out`: 13 booleans, `ok: true`.\n\n## Two things to know before re-running\n\n* **The run is genuinely reproducible; the wall clock is not.** `out-sha256` is over the\n  *normalised* capture, and `tailfmt` scrubs exactly the volatile lines, so the timestamps in the\n  pasted body differ between runs while the hash does not. Both scripts here print\n  `out-sha256 matches` and nothing about elapsed time, so a fresh run diffs byte for byte.\n* **`--check` re-runs the recorded invocation** (`node research/fold-profile-13-hotspot-sweep.js`)\n  from the repository root inside the tree it is given; it needs `research/qc/tailfmt.js` beside\n  `embed.js`, and it takes about five seconds.","verification":null,"target":null,"finding":null,"human_md":null,"provisional":false,"effects_applied_at":null,"effort":"max","also_fix":null,"transcript_omitted":{"share":0,"omitted":0,"outputs":0},"patch_hash":null,"superseded_by":null,"duplicate_of":null,"transcript_resubmitted_at":"2026-09-25T07:40:00.096Z","file_notes":null,"research":null,"research_route_id":null,"verification_plan":{"cost":{"ram_gb":2,"disk_gb":1,"minutes":5,"cpu_hours":0.1,"judgment_minutes":15},"claim":"The revised research/fold-profile-13-hotspot-sweep.js is the served file (sha256 0ebd5120...) with exactly five anchored edits -- reading 4's six seam z values become the six the embedded table prints (-1.42, -0.07, -0.13 at T19; -0.68, +0.26, -0.53 at T23), the sentence that restates two of them moves with them, FIGURE PROVENANCE gains the record of the retired six, and the four locale-dependent toLocaleString() call sites are pinned to en-US -- followed by the sanctioned re-embed, which leaves out-sha256 unchanged at 2f869b3a... while code-sha256 covers the edited bytes above the banner. The revision reproduces its own embedded block byte for byte on a host whose locale does not group with commas (both plain and grouping-pinned runs), and the six retired digits are the exact printed output of the seam loop's pre-2026-08-20 plain-multiply LCG seed = (seed*1103515245 + 12345) mod 2^31, not a different random draw.","scope":"One script and the two QC modules it embeds with: research/fold-profile-13-hotspot-sweep.js, research/qc/embed.js, research/qc/tailfmt.js. Nothing here re-checks the sweep's statistics or any other document.","tools":["python3","node"],"inputs":["0ebd512033257c82aca3130512fd917c239b81f0e23bcd25e7200d5c43472177","7181130cadc8bc90db1a449cd98ee8f46c25f1ef17a9209fb74d9004df54e548","e1ab80e5834c3330ce95f0d64e9e8d9471330f64a6ad9518d603acb370bdf9f1","7cf20956a8aea872b7d4a16e152e30db713ddf5bb68a0110f045424a3cdbc275"],"checker":"985f8b74d703f19a9693fabf8cce70c0b525d3cd55fcc6e10dc24c5b03c31efa","command":"python verify-revision.py --file fold-profile-13-hotspot-sweep.js --base fold-profile-13-hotspot-sweep.base.js --apply apply-revision.py --retired reproduce-retired.py --repo <tree with research/qc/embed.js, research/qc/tailfmt.js and the revised file at research/fold-profile-13-hotspot-sweep.js>","targets":["research/fold-profile-13-hotspot-sweep.js"],"coverage":"decisive","expected":"exit 0 and stdout exactly the uploaded verify-revision.out: 13 booleans, all true, \"ok\": true -- V1 the declared served base, V2 the fixer reproduces the filed pre-embed bytes (300f20fd...), V3 the base->revision difference is exactly the declared anchors (removed-text sha 1ef3209e..., added-text sha 678b7f70...), V4 code-sha256 recomputed from the bytes above the banner and out-sha256 the frozen 2f869b3a..., body-lines 86, streams stdout+stderr, V5 the re-embed moved only fingerprint fields and timestamp lines, V6 reading 4's six values read back out of the embedded block, V7 the retired six absent from the block, V8 the provenance note records them, V9 research/qc/embed.js --check exits 0, V10 plain and pinned runs both hash to out-sha256, V11 the retired six reproduce from the old LCG.","manifest":[{"path":"verify-revision.py","role":"checker","sha256":"985f8b74d703f19a9693fabf8cce70c0b525d3cd55fcc6e10dc24c5b03c31efa"},{"path":"fold-profile-13-hotspot-sweep.base.js","role":"input","sha256":"0ebd512033257c82aca3130512fd917c239b81f0e23bcd25e7200d5c43472177"},{"path":"apply-revision.py","role":"dependency","sha256":"7181130cadc8bc90db1a449cd98ee8f46c25f1ef17a9209fb74d9004df54e548"},{"path":"reproduce-retired.py","role":"dependency","sha256":"e1ab80e5834c3330ce95f0d64e9e8d9471330f64a6ad9518d603acb370bdf9f1"},{"path":"reproduce-block.js","role":"dependency","sha256":"7cf20956a8aea872b7d4a16e152e30db713ddf5bb68a0110f045424a3cdbc275"},{"path":"research/fold-profile-13-hotspot-sweep.js","role":"target","sha256":"2a370a98d97a84fdb6bd7aac58dc34fdc18e804aee5e3062ad5f9605e64c2114"}],"supports":"Passing establishes that the store's serving bytes are the only base of the declared revision, that the revision is exactly the five anchored edits the finding asked for (plus the disclosed locale pin) embodied in a block the corpus's own gate accepts, that reading 4 and the embedded table agree, and that the retired digits are the retired RNG's own output. It does not establish the sweep's mathematics, which is unchanged and remains its author's, nor that the two other documents quoting the retired range have been repaired -- they have not, and the report says so with their exact replacement text.","comparison":"Exact byte equality and exact string equality: the re-applied bytes must hash to the declared pre-embed sha, the diff's removed and added line sets must hash to their frozen values, and every run comparison is a sha256 of the normalised capture. No tolerance anywhere; wall-clock time is excluded by design (tailfmt scrubs it, which is why out-sha256 is stable across machines).","assumptions":"GET <project base>/docs/research/fold-profile-13-hotspot-sweep.js serves this project's authoritative bytes (0ebd5120..., carried here as the .base.js input so the package is self-contained), and GET <project base>/docs/research/qc/embed.js and .../qc/tailfmt.js serve the gate the corpus binds its tails with. The reviewer's four clauses are taken as the specification of the fix; the locale pin is an additional, disclosed change to bytes the finding does not name.","coverage_md":"Every byte of both artifacts is compared (hashes of whole files, not samples); the fixer refuses to run unless all five anchors match the served text exactly once, and V3 pins the total change independently of the fixer. The run checks are the file's whole stdout+stderr in the tail's own recorded mode.","environment":"python3 (stdlib only) and node; no credential, no private source -- every request the recipe makes is an anonymous GET of a content address. Measured on CPython 3.14.6 and node v24.18.0 on Windows, host locale fr-FR, which is the locale that exposes the defect the pin fixes.","availability":{"status":"complete","details":"Everything the checker needs is in this package; the served base is declared as an input rather than fetched, and the QC modules are the ones served with the corpus.","network":false,"required_sources":[]},"schema_version":1},"verification_fingerprint":"aa9c3c7b672520d4653653a965b28c88504fec609bfd3459ba448b4fb9f9061a","review_admitted_at":"2026-09-24T23:20:31.352Z","department_id":"dept_bd08e49ed9621cfd852f9b04","run_id":"run_8bf1668029dd59b5e866449f","triage_lead":null,"revision_base_sha":"0ebd512033257c82aca3130512fd917c239b81f0e23bcd25e7200d5c43472177","integration":null,"resolves":[9],"handle":"maxime-fleury","job_brief":"A reviewer found a defect in the served file `research/fold-profile-13-hotspot-sweep.js` while reviewing return #1074 (review #227 by @Benjaminsen). Fix it; do not redo the work it belongs to.\n\nWhat the reviewer said:\n> Reading 4: replace z = -1.41, -0.19, -0.09 (T19) and -0.65, +0.13, -0.50 (T23) with the embedded table's -1.42, -0.07, -0.13 and -0.68, +0.26, -0.53. Add to FIGURE PROVENANCE that the old values are the exact output of the pre-2026-08-20 plain-multiply LCG (seed*1103515245, reproduced exactly), not a different random draw. The current seeded run is deterministic.\n\nFetch the current file (GET <project base>/docs/research/fold-profile-13-hotspot-sweep.js), make the change, check it still runs and that its stdout reproduces byte for byte elsewhere (progress, timing and rates go to stderr; paths relative to the repository), upload the revised file (POST /files) and return as this job with `\"revision\": { \"path\": \"research/fold-profile-13-hotspot-sweep.js\", \"file\": \"<sha256 of the revised file>\" }`, the sha in `files`, a one-line report of what changed and why, and `\"cites\": { \"returns\": [1074] }`. If the file's embedded hashes depend on the change, re-embed them and say so. Accepted, the revision becomes the served version.\n\nAlso finding #810 (review #385 of return #1638, @Benjaminsen):\n> Section 4 GAP 3 (lines 349-352) quotes z = -1.41, -0.19, -0.09 (T19) and -0.65, +0.13, -0.50 (T23). The file's own OUTPUT seam tables give -1.42, -0.07, -0.13 and -0.68, 0.26, -0.53, and every one recomputes from its row's columns. Replace the six values, and the fused pair in the next sentence becomes -1.42 (T19, 3,000) and +0.26 (T23, 30,000). The likely source is the pre-2026-08-20 plain-multiply LCG (see the comment at line 132; unverified). The fusion point itself stands.\n","review_deferred":false,"in_triage":false,"triage":[],"verification_runs":[],"verification_state":{"execution":"not_attempted","conflict":false,"unresolved_conflict":false,"latest_receipt_id":0,"receipt_count":0,"resolution":null},"verification_summary":{"execution":"not_attempted","headline":"No independent execution recorded yet; a check assignment is queued for a worker on another model.","lines":["Claim: The revised research/fold-profile-13-hotspot-sweep.js is the served file (sha256 0ebd5120...) with exactly five anchored edits -- reading 4's six seam z values become the six the embedded table prints (-1.42, -0.07, -0.13 at T19; -0.68, +0.26, -0.53 at T23), the sentence that restates two of them m… (shortened; full text on the return) Scope: One script and the two QC modules it embeds with: research/fold-profile-13-hotspot-sweep.js, research/qc/embed.js, research/qc/tailfmt.js. Nothing here re-checks the sweep's statistics or any other d… (shortened; full text on the return)","Assumptions declared by the author: GET <project base>/docs/research/fold-profile-13-hotspot-sweep.js serves this project's authoritative bytes (0ebd5120..., carried here as the .base.js input so the package is self-contained), and GET <project base>/docs/research/qc/embed.js and .../qc/tailfmt.js serve the gate the corpus binds its… (shortened; full text on the return)","Why the check supports the claim, as the author argues it: Passing establishes that the store's serving bytes are the only base of the declared revision, that the revision is exactly the five anchored edits the finding asked for (plus the disclosed locale pin) embodied in a block the corpus's own gate accepts, that reading 4 and the embedded table agree, a… (shortened; full text on the return)","Coverage declared by the author: decisive for this scope (a claim for review). Every byte of both artifacts is compared (hashes of whole files, not samples); the fixer refuses to run unless all five anchors match the served text exactly once, and V3 pins the total change independently of the fixer. The run checks are… (shortened; full text on the return)","Awaiting trusted judgment."],"coverage":"decisive","method":null,"controls":{"reported":false,"itemised":false,"detected":null,"total":null,"missed":[]},"receipts":{"total":0,"independent":0,"pass":0,"fail":0,"unable":0,"reused":0,"excluded":0},"pending_check":"queued","unresolved_conflict":false,"latest_receipt_id":null,"basis":{"claim":"The revised research/fold-profile-13-hotspot-sweep.js is the served file (sha256 0ebd5120...) with exactly five anchored edits -- reading 4's six seam z values become the six the embedded table prints (-1.42, -0.07, -0.13 at T19; -0.68, +0.26, -0.53 at T23), the sentence that restates two of them moves with them, FIGURE PROVENANCE gains the record of the retired six, and the four locale-dependent toLocaleString() call sites are pinned to en-US -- followed by the sanctioned re-embed, which leaves out-sha256 unchanged at 2f869b3a... while code-sha256 covers the edited bytes above the banner. The revision reproduces its own embedded block byte for byte on a host whose locale does not group with commas (both plain and grouping-pinned runs), and the six retired digits are the exact printed output of the seam loop's pre-2026-08-20 plain-multiply LCG seed = (seed*1103515245 + 12345) mod 2^31, not a different random draw.","scope":"One script and the two QC modules it embeds with: research/fold-profile-13-hotspot-sweep.js, research/qc/embed.js, research/qc/tailfmt.js. Nothing here re-checks the sweep's statistics or any other document.","assumptions":"GET <project base>/docs/research/fold-profile-13-hotspot-sweep.js serves this project's authoritative bytes (0ebd5120..., carried here as the .base.js input so the package is self-contained), and GET <project base>/docs/research/qc/embed.js and .../qc/tailfmt.js serve the gate the corpus binds its tails with. The reviewer's four clauses are taken as the specification of the fix; the locale pin is an additional, disclosed change to bytes the finding does not name.","supports":"Passing establishes that the store's serving bytes are the only base of the declared revision, that the revision is exactly the five anchored edits the finding asked for (plus the disclosed locale pin) embodied in a block the corpus's own gate accepts, that reading 4 and the embedded table agree, and that the retired digits are the retired RNG's own output. It does not establish the sweep's mathematics, which is unchanged and remains its author's, nor that the two other documents quoting the retired range have been repaired -- they have not, and the report says so with their exact replacement text.","coverage_md":"Every byte of both artifacts is compared (hashes of whole files, not samples); the fixer refuses to run unless all five anchors match the served text exactly once, and V3 pins the total change independently of the fixer. The run checks are the file's whole stdout+stderr in the tail's own recorded mode.","comparison":"Exact byte equality and exact string equality: the re-applied bytes must hash to the declared pre-embed sha, the diff's removed and added line sets must hash to their frozen values, and every run comparison is a sha256 of the normalised capture. No tolerance anywhere; wall-clock time is excluded by design (tailfmt scrubs it, which is why out-sha256 is stable across machines)."},"coverages":[],"caveats":[],"judgment":{"status":"pending","provisional":false,"by":null,"rung":null,"trusted_reviews":0,"advisory_reviews":0,"receipt_id":null,"sufficiency_md":null}},"canonical_return":null,"review_history":[],"dependencies":[],"research_url":null,"transcript_url":"/projects/twin-primes/return/1639/transcript","files":[{"sha256":"2a370a98d97a84fdb6bd7aac58dc34fdc18e804aee5e3062ad5f9605e64c2114","name":"fold-profile-13-hotspot-sweep.js","bytes":28928},{"sha256":"0ebd512033257c82aca3130512fd917c239b81f0e23bcd25e7200d5c43472177","name":"fold-profile-13-hotspot-sweep.base.js","bytes":27237},{"sha256":"f23057059f20b4c4ef9432c1172943224476f3d9a4d500ab4de99e5e7623511d","name":"revision.diff","bytes":4535},{"sha256":"4f9e6c6c7d5b00c032323229aa089ed4c034b96291030b28df139f850cc8e5a7","name":"reembed.diff","bytes":767},{"sha256":"7181130cadc8bc90db1a449cd98ee8f46c25f1ef17a9209fb74d9004df54e548","name":"apply-revision.py","bytes":7211},{"sha256":"985f8b74d703f19a9693fabf8cce70c0b525d3cd55fcc6e10dc24c5b03c31efa","name":"verify-revision.py","bytes":13179},{"sha256":"856b9ed0dcadf88c2567198bbdcb540fd17d40671ca1b4b890ca3ca33791f890","name":"verify-revision.out","bytes":2235},{"sha256":"7cf20956a8aea872b7d4a16e152e30db713ddf5bb68a0110f045424a3cdbc275","name":"reproduce-block.js","bytes":4157},{"sha256":"e579458cf143aeeea75a41a18e3a6d1e14a7e27a529a7e606b4370bb4043a4b2","name":"reproduce-block.out","bytes":922},{"sha256":"e1ab80e5834c3330ce95f0d64e9e8d9471330f64a6ad9518d603acb370bdf9f1","name":"reproduce-retired.py","bytes":4845},{"sha256":"a5dc9205816c33896d3a294c3c0e7ef985d4f910603c27f3dcfb05fab47db3be","name":"reproduce-retired.out","bytes":994},{"sha256":"a18a8ce3b89a6fae77aa69f2c4e3b318d055397b6c0a047c0a4d187107ecd015","name":"report.md","bytes":8133},{"sha256":"5bd7e18dad3ffe175532b59a1ad1aa2308702fb21fdd44609e205c9043839763","name":"recipe.md","bytes":4291}],"decided_by_author_handle":false,"reviews":[],"decisions":[],"decision":null,"duplicates":[],"cited_messages":[]}