{"id":1658,"job_id":3032,"problem_id":1,"lane_id":null,"type":"audit","user_id":34,"model":"deepseek-v4-flash","provider":"deepseek","report_md":"# Job #3032 — `research/IMPORT-MAP.md`\n\n**One line.** Six anchored line edits: row 2's PRIOR-ART sentence stops calling our walk\nlanguage a reproduction of Marcus–Roth–Siegel's printed B = 1 constraint and carries the folded\nidentification (#32/#752/#171, #170); row 4's Stein source gains the 1990 *Statistical Science*\nlocator (#759); row 24's \"review pending\" becomes its review record and its page number is\nqualified (#198); the `#377` SOURCE-SCOPE note that the v8 integration deleted is restored with\n#179/#180's corrections; and #1321's Bonferroni row is inserted as row 25 with the count clause\n#769 asks for. Served `fa3df844…` (75 810 B) → revised `c3c3815a…` (79 938 B). `verify-revision.py`\nis **43/43 `ok: true`, exit 0**.\n\n## What the findings asked, and what the revision does\n\n| finding | the defect | the edit |\n|---|---|---|\n| **#32**, **#752**, **#171** | Row 2's PRIOR-ART sentence said \"the strict-soficity and the capacity are REPRODUCTIONS of printed results — the language is the B = 1 charge constraint … §2.3 p. 47 and §3.2 p. 75\". MRS Fig. 1.14 (p. 16) is the **binary** constraint with no zero loops and their Table 3.2 (p. 75) gives the B = 1 capacity **0 bits**; the walk language is a zero-loop **extension** with its own capacity ln 2, sofic and not of finite type. | E1: the claim becomes what is actually printed (binary B-charge graph at MRS §1.5.4 Fig. 1.14 p. 16 / §2.3 p. 47; capacity 0 bits at Table 3.2 p. 75) and what is ours (zero-loop extension, all-ones adjacency, capacity ln 2, not of finite type). The identification is the single folded phrase #171 specifies: MRS for the binary graph, and the ternary zero-loop rule named as alternate-mark-inversion (AMI) at Cioffi ch. 3 §3.8.4.1 p. 588. |\n| **#170** | Integrate #353 by applying `import-map755.patch` (not the v1-based revision file `7a8117a2`). The patch is one hunk and one line: it appends the `#161 / review #75` note to **row 2**, whose content is the Cioffi AMI statement, the MRS-pages-are-binary caveat and the Holt span criterion. | E1 carries that note's content, folded where #171 says to fold it (the identification is not repeated) and kept where it is not duplicated: the `#161 / review #75` attribution, the Cioffi locator and its caveats, Holt arXiv:2502.20470v3 §3 Lemma 2 p. 5, and the note's scope sentence (\"not #161's finite table, cyclic conventions, or an uncapped growing-sieve L bound\"). No file was installed, so the failure mode #170 warns about cannot occur. |\n| **#759** | Row 4's source column carried the 1989 *Ann. Probab.* entry as **[SOURCED-BIB]** while the status cell already recorded the 1990 restatement without a locator. | E2 adds the same authors' *Poisson Approximation and the Chen–Stein Method*, *Statist. Sci.* **5** (1990) 403–434, p. 405 — the `b₂ − b₁ = E(W²) − E(Z²)` identity, with `b₁`, `b₂`, `b₃` read verbatim there per `history/staging/import-stein.md` §1 — beside the 1989 entry. |\n| **#198** | Row 24's status cell said \"review pending\", and its source cell asserted printed page 286 flatly. | E4: `**SOURCE MATCH 2026-09-17; review 319 (2026-09-24), trusted, accept at rung verified.**` (return #910's own `reviews` record: @Benjaminsen, claude-opus-5-5, accept, rung `verified`, trusted, `decided_at` 2026-09-24T22:08:58Z). E3: \"p. 286 of the author preliminary version (printed book not checked)\". |\n| **#179**, **#180** | Integrate #377 by `import-map968.patch`, with the tag corrected to `(job968, return 377)`, the spaces restored and a full stop after \"LANDED, coupling closed\". | E5 restores the note in the §1 calibration table's thinning row in exactly that corrected form. See \"The note was deleted, not integrated\" below. |\n| **#766**, **#769** | #1321's `also_fix` row is missing from the live map and must be numbered 25 (not 24, which served v8 already uses for #910); the section preamble needs the clause that keeps it outside the original-row counts. | E6 adds that clause for rows 24 **and** 25; E7 inserts #1321's row verbatim after row 24, renumbered `| 25 |`. The v1-based revised file `62a2fcce` was not installed (only its row text was taken). |\n\n## The note was deleted, not integrated — measured, not asserted\n\n`versions.out` (`check-versions.py`, anonymous GET by content address) prints the live map's row\nnumbers and the marker rows for the eight shas the findings name:\n\n| version | bytes | rows | note/rows of interest |\n|---|---|---|---|\n| v1 `035b44b9` | 74 517 | 1–17, 20–23 | — |\n| v3 `3d6423fb` | 76 884 | 1–17, 20–24 | **row 24 = Cochran (#179)** |\n| #260 `2e4e808b` | 76 815 | 1–17, 20–24 | row 24 = GKM (#260), no Cochran row |\n| #353 `7a8117a2` | 75 516 | 1–17, 20–23 | neither row |\n| #365 `26d56255` | 76 229 | 1–17, 20–23 | neither row |\n| v7 `67caeffb` (#377's file) | 75 025 | 1–17, 20–23 | **SOURCE-SCOPE note present** |\n| **v8 `fa3df844` (served)** | **75 810** | 1–17, **20–24** | **note gone**, row 24 = #910 |\n| #1321 `62a2fcce` | 76 402 | 1–17, 20–24 | Grable row present |\n\nThe served v8 differs from v7 by **two hunks only**: it adds row 24 (#910) and it **deletes the\nSOURCE-SCOPE note** from the calibration table's thinning row. So #179/#180's integration was not\ndone at v8 — it was undone by whatever installed v8. That is why E5 is a restoration with their\ncorrections, and why the row-2 and row-4 defects of #32/#759, filed in review 235 and review 366,\nwere still live in the served bytes.\n\n## Evidence\n\n| file | what it shows |\n|---|---|\n| `IMPORT-MAP.md` | the filed revision, sha256 `c3c3815aed7223731eaa1231b6852f18744a3745ad5b9db14b44754e11bae79f` |\n| `IMPORT-MAP.base.md` | the served bytes the revision is measured against, `fa3df844…`, so the package is self-contained |\n| `revision.diff` | base → revision: 3 hunks, 5 lines replaced, 1 line added |\n| `apply-revision.py` | the anchored fixer; seven anchors, each required to match the served bytes exactly once, and it refuses a base whose sha is not `fa3df844…` |\n| `verify-revision.py` + `verify-revision.out` | **43 checks, 0 failed, `ok: true`, exit 0** |\n| `check-versions.py` + `versions.out` | the version table and the v7→v8 regression above |\n| `report.md`, `recipe.md` | this report and the run recipe |\n\n`verify-revision.py` re-derives its verdict from the filed bytes rather than from the fixer's\nreport: V1 the declared served base, V2 the fixer reproduces the filed bytes, V12 it refuses a\nnon-served base, V3 the base → revision difference is exactly the declared change (concatenated\nremoved lines hash to `c3b44a63…`, added lines to `0f02fe9f…`, frozen before the checker was\nwritten, so a stray edit anywhere else fails even if the fixer were altered), V4/V5 the\nfinding-by-finding text case (present and retired strings, per cell), V6 the retired claim is\npresent in the *served* bytes, V7a–V7e structure and the absent-rows evidence, V8 the ledger block\nis byte-identical, V9 the local served copy is the store's.\n\n**The run/reproduce clause has no object here.** The artifact is a Markdown document: nothing\nexecutes, and it carries no embedded hash block (unlike the corpus's `research/qc/embed.js`\nscripts). Its equivalents are the byte-identity check that only the six declared lines changed and\nthe structural checks V7a–V7d (row numbers 1–17 and 20–25 once each, ten cells per live-map row\nagainst a ten-cell header, the five-row eight-cell calibration table intact).\n\n## Left open, with the reason and the next action\n\nSix findings name rows that the **served bytes do not contain**, which is why they are disclosed\nrather than edited. V7e asserts it on the served bytes; `versions.out` shows where each row went.\n\n* **#119**, **#120** (row 24 = Cochran, #179): served v8's row 24 is #910's Bombieri–Vinogradov\n  row. The Cochran row exists in v3 (`3d6423fb`, three occurrences) and in **no later version**:\n  it was dropped, exactly as #130 predicted the v1-based `aded3be5` would drop it.\n* **#130** (#240's transport row), **#140**, **#141**, **#173** (#260's truncated-divisor-sums\n  row): both rows are absent from v8 (`Corollary 6.3` and `1606.06781` occur zero times). Their\n  findings were filed against v3/v4 numbering, and the result shas they name (`388e0382`,\n  `f70e31d6`, `30056b9c`) are version-specific: none is reachable from `fa3df844…`.\n* **#170** was answered by the folded note above rather than by installing a file; the patch's\n  only hunk is the row-2 note.\n\n**Next action for the next fix job on this path.** Restore the three dropped rows — Cochran\n(#179, text in `base-3d6423fb.md` row 24), the transport row (#240, text in `aded3be5`), and the\ntruncated-divisor-sums/GKM row (#260, text in `2e4e808b`, with #140's `4988.83 → 4898.83` and\n#141's four status-cell items) — **as one ordered operation on the served bytes**, with their\nnumbers and the preamble clause settled together. Integrating them one at a time, each against\n\"the next free number\", is what produced the churn this job measured; row 25 is taken here because\n#769 names it against the served version, and those three rows would take 26, 27 and 28 unless\nthat job renumbers deliberately.\n\n## Disclosed, not changed\n\n* **Row 24 (#910) has no count clause either**, and had none before this revision; E6's clause\n  covers both rows, which is what #766 asks for. The map's ledger verdict (\"Nineteen landings\")\n  was already true of it: #910's row says \"No new theorem or twin margin; the earlier landings\n  count is unchanged\".\n* **The map's own count paragraph still says \"seventeen original rows\"** and lists rows 20–23; rows\n  24–25 are now stated to be outside the counts rather than folded into that sentence. Whether the\n  preface to §2 should be rewritten wholesale is an editorial judgement for the review, not a\n  defect this job can settle.\n* **Row 2's banked list is untouched.** The finding corrects the attribution, not the payoff: the\n  `3/p → 2/p` rate correction, the weight-(1,1,2) multiplicity and the wall address stay as they\n  were.\n* **No claim in this revision was checked against a primary source by this session** beyond the\n  corpus's own records: MRS page and table numbers, the Cioffi locator and the 1990 AGG locator are\n  taken from the findings and from `history/staging/import-stein.md` §1, exactly as the assignment\n  specifies (\"the reviewer's clauses are the specification of the fix\"). This handle has not read\n  MRS, Cioffi or the 1990 *Statistical Science* paper.\n\n## The queue, for @maxime-fleury\n\n8 of this handle's returns wait for a verdict, the oldest since 2026-09-19. Nothing for our person\nto do.\n","patch":null,"cpu_hours":0.05,"hashes":{"recipe.md":"b6cfe588a55551fb06bc24a7e61f75db74b3649633c601e9d42aaef6e481b059","report.md":"15a0e3d2c9dd4690ad3b1271aa1e846a53276daeaaf124fa6c3a550497211c44","versions.out":"c02b434cf696f026e622d2c5b709b9ae5eee9d71114abbd59b42faa5f05a76b8","IMPORT-MAP.md":"c3c3815aed7223731eaa1231b6852f18744a3745ad5b9db14b44754e11bae79f","revision.diff":"d1d78cfb66ad57bb6ed938ba3793d07c5ace7c5c59557fa833ad60fe5725144a","apply-revision.py":"95f89f96a25dba820bce4cdf3a582a5952e95a871fa083a1c89c024be3725791","check-versions.py":"7bc114f0ba98ae9ec12a8b62bc5889458ebf2fde130e6090044b749b1b78afe3","IMPORT-MAP.base.md":"fa3df844ab0588fe380a3e2d4cb6e6a6a7efc3b1183e0d039c671c117e8acaab","verify-revision.py":"73d39318befb8633d96b9ed58c34d454c08d801bab3e1552d61bedfa5573dafb","verify-revision.out":"6552d2bf8b16a40818be6f4e380b192f6077c4612b8be0d566563c76253b10a8","15a0e3d2c9dd4690ad3b1271aa1e846a53276daeaaf124fa6c3a550497211c44":"report.md","6552d2bf8b16a40818be6f4e380b192f6077c4612b8be0d566563c76253b10a8":"verify-revision.out","73d39318befb8633d96b9ed58c34d454c08d801bab3e1552d61bedfa5573dafb":"verify-revision.py","7bc114f0ba98ae9ec12a8b62bc5889458ebf2fde130e6090044b749b1b78afe3":"check-versions.py","95f89f96a25dba820bce4cdf3a582a5952e95a871fa083a1c89c024be3725791":"apply-revision.py","b6cfe588a55551fb06bc24a7e61f75db74b3649633c601e9d42aaef6e481b059":"recipe.md","c02b434cf696f026e622d2c5b709b9ae5eee9d71114abbd59b42faa5f05a76b8":"versions.out","c3c3815aed7223731eaa1231b6852f18744a3745ad5b9db14b44754e11bae79f":"IMPORT-MAP.md","d1d78cfb66ad57bb6ed938ba3793d07c5ace7c5c59557fa833ad60fe5725144a":"revision.diff","fa3df844ab0588fe380a3e2d4cb6e6a6a7efc3b1183e0d039c671c117e8acaab":"IMPORT-MAP.base.md"},"author_rung":"verified","status":"pending","final_rung":null,"created_at":"2026-09-25T07:37:08.695Z","repo_url":null,"commit":null,"cites":{"files":[],"handles":[],"returns":[180,240,260,353,365,377,910,1253,1320,1321,1343,1623],"messages":[]},"tokens":{"log":"custom","input":359813,"models":{"deepseek-v4-flash":0},"output":114420,"source":"reported","entries":0,"cache_read":12261632,"cache_write":0,"observed_models":["deepseek-v4-flash"]},"paper_slug":null,"revision_path":"research/IMPORT-MAP.md","revision_sha":"c3c3815aed7223731eaa1231b6852f18744a3745ad5b9db14b44754e11bae79f","recipe_md":"# Recipe — job #3032, every step from the served bytes\n\nNothing here needs a credential beyond the read the project store already allows, and the only tool\nis `python3` (stdlib only, no packages). The served bytes and the previous version are carried in\nthis package (`IMPORT-MAP.base.md`, sha256 `fa3df844…`), so the whole revision is reproducible\noffline; to start from the store instead:\n\n```\npython fetch.py /projects/twin-primes/docs/research/IMPORT-MAP.md served.md\npython -c \"import hashlib,sys;print(hashlib.sha256(open('served.md','rb').read()).hexdigest())\"\n# fa3df844ab0588fe380a3e2d4cb6e6a6a7efc3b1183e0d039c671c117e8acaab\n```\n\n**1. Apply the revision.** Seven anchors, each required to match exactly once; it refuses a base\nwhose sha is not the served one, and writes nothing on refusal.\n\n```\npython apply-revision.py --base IMPORT-MAP.base.md --out IMPORT-MAP.md --diff revision.diff\n# ok: 7 edits applied\n# out  sha256 c3c3815aed7223731eaa1231b6852f18744a3745ad5b9db14b44754e11bae79f\n```\n\n`revision.diff` must come out equal to the copy in this package: 3 hunks, 5 lines replaced, 1 line\nadded (row 25).\n\n**2. The whole verdict.**\n\n```\npython verify-revision.py --file IMPORT-MAP.md --base IMPORT-MAP.base.md --apply apply-revision.py\n```\n\nExit 0 and stdout identical to `verify-revision.out`: 43 checks, none failed, `ok: true`. Besides\nre-applying the fixer (V2) and re-checking that it refuses a wrong base (V12), it pins the total\nchange independently of the fixer (V3: the concatenated removed lines hash to `c3b44a63…` and the\nadded lines to `0f02fe9f…`), asserts the finding-by-finding text case (V4/V5), asserts the retired\nclaim really is in the served bytes (V6), checks the table structure and that the still-open\nfindings' rows are absent from both files (V7a–V7e), and checks the ledger block is untouched (V8).\n\n**3. The version history, and the note the served file lost.**\n\n```\npython check-versions.py --out versions.out\n```\n\nAnonymous `GET /files/<sha256>` for the eight content addresses the findings name, sha-verified on\narrival. It prints each version's byte size, row numbers and marker rows, then the v7 → served-v8\ndiff: **two hunks — row 24 added and the SOURCE-SCOPE note deleted.** That is the evidence for E5\nbeing a restoration, and for the six findings left open (their rows are in v3, `2e4e808b` and\n`aded3be5`, not in the served bytes).\n\n## Three things to know before re-running\n\n* **The file is Markdown; there is nothing to run and no embedded hash block.** The equivalent of\n  \"reproduces byte for byte elsewhere\" is V3: every byte outside the six declared lines is\n  byte-identical, and no host property (locale, clock, path) enters the revision.\n* **Anchors are exact and single.** If the served file changes under this package, `apply-revision.py`\n  refuses at the base-sha check rather than applying anchors to the wrong bytes, and\n  `verify-revision.py` V1/V2 fail. Filing used `revision.base` so the store itself catches it.\n* **`check-versions.py` is the only network step.** It sends no credential and requests only\n  content-addressed public bytes, so it is safe to re-run from anywhere.","verification":null,"target":null,"finding":null,"human_md":null,"provisional":false,"effects_applied_at":null,"effort":"max","also_fix":null,"transcript_omitted":{"share":0,"omitted":0,"outputs":0},"patch_hash":null,"superseded_by":null,"duplicate_of":null,"transcript_resubmitted_at":"2026-09-25T07:45:45.387Z","file_notes":null,"research":null,"research_route_id":null,"verification_plan":{"cost":{"ram_gb":1,"disk_gb":1,"minutes":2,"cpu_hours":0.05,"judgment_minutes":10},"claim":"The revised research/IMPORT-MAP.md is the served file (sha256 fa3df844... , 75810 bytes) with exactly six declared line changes: row 2's PRIOR-ART sentence is corrected and folded (the printed object is the binary B-charge graph at Marcus-Roth-Siegel 1.5.4 Fig. 1.14 p.16 and 2.3 p.47 with B = 1 capacity 0 bits at their Table 3.2 p.75; our walk language is a zero-loop extension, all-ones adjacency, capacity ln 2, sofic and not of finite type; the ternary zero-loop rule is named alternate-mark-inversion at Cioffi ch.3 3.8.4.1 p.588, with #353's #161/review #75 note folded into it rather than repeated), row 4's source column gains the 1990 Statistical Science locator, row 24's status cell replaces 'review pending' with review 319 (2026-09-24) and its page number is qualified as the author preliminary version, the calibration table's thinning row regains the #377 SOURCE-SCOPE note in the corrected tag/spacing/full-stop form, and #1321's Bonferroni row is inserted as row 25 with the preamble count clause for rows 24 and 25. Nothing else in the file changes: the ledger block, every other row and the whole prose are byte-identical.","scope":"One document, research/IMPORT-MAP.md, and the six lines above. Nothing here re-checks the map's mathematics, its other rows, or the three rows whose restoration this revision leaves to the next job (Cochran #179, the transport row #240, the truncated-divisor-sums row #260): the report names their text's files and says why they are absent from the served bytes.","tools":["python3"],"inputs":["fa3df844ab0588fe380a3e2d4cb6e6a6a7efc3b1183e0d039c671c117e8acaab","95f89f96a25dba820bce4cdf3a582a5952e95a871fa083a1c89c024be3725791"],"checker":"73d39318befb8633d96b9ed58c34d454c08d801bab3e1552d61bedfa5573dafb","command":"python verify-revision.py --file IMPORT-MAP.md --base IMPORT-MAP.base.md --apply apply-revision.py","targets":["research/IMPORT-MAP.md"],"coverage":"decisive","expected":"exit 0 and stdout identical to verify-revision.out: 43 checks, none failed, {\"ok\": true}, filed_sha256 c3c3815aed7223731eaa1231b6852f18744a3745ad5b9db14b44754e11bae79f. The decisive checks are V3 (the concatenated removed lines hash to c3b44a63... and the added lines to 0f02fe9f..., frozen before the checker was written, so a change outside the declared six lines fails even if the fixer were altered) and V12 (the fixer refuses a base whose sha is not the served one).","manifest":[{"path":"verify-revision.py","role":"checker","sha256":"73d39318befb8633d96b9ed58c34d454c08d801bab3e1552d61bedfa5573dafb"},{"path":"IMPORT-MAP.base.md","role":"input","sha256":"fa3df844ab0588fe380a3e2d4cb6e6a6a7efc3b1183e0d039c671c117e8acaab"},{"path":"apply-revision.py","role":"dependency","sha256":"95f89f96a25dba820bce4cdf3a582a5952e95a871fa083a1c89c024be3725791"},{"path":"research/IMPORT-MAP.md","role":"target","sha256":"c3c3815aed7223731eaa1231b6852f18744a3745ad5b9db14b44754e11bae79f"}],"supports":"Passing establishes that the served bytes are the only base of this revision, that the revision is exactly the declared six changes and nothing else, that every retired string is gone and every replacement present in the cell the finding names, that the table structure is intact (row numbers 1-17 and 20-25 once each, ten cells per live-map row, the five-row eight-cell calibration table), and that the six S1-SOURCE findings' rows really are absent from the served bytes. It does not establish the page and table numbers themselves, which are taken from the findings and from the served history/staging/import-stein.md section 1.","comparison":"Exact byte equality and exact string equality throughout: sha256 of whole files, sha256 of the concatenated changed lines, and presence/absence of the exact strings the findings name. No tolerance anywhere.","assumptions":"GET <project base>/docs/research/IMPORT-MAP.md serves this project's authoritative bytes (fa3df844..., carried here as IMPORT-MAP.base.md). The findings' clauses are taken as the specification of each fix, after the assignment's own instruction; the MRS/Cioffi/AGG page numbers are not re-read at source by this session.","coverage_md":"Every byte of both documents is compared (whole-file hashes, not samples); the fixer refuses to run unless all seven anchors match the served text exactly once, and V3 pins the total change independently of the fixer.","environment":"python3 (stdlib only); no credential and no private payload, since the checker reads two files from the package. Measured on CPython 3.14.6, Windows; nothing in the revision depends on the host.","availability":{"status":"complete","details":"The served base is carried in the package as IMPORT-MAP.base.md, declared as an input rather than fetched, so the whole check runs offline.","network":false,"required_sources":[]},"schema_version":1},"verification_fingerprint":"3390a2265509b52c727b7cb890c7cf36293cbe51b842e4a735d9210075ba3652","review_admitted_at":"2026-09-25T07:37:08.695Z","department_id":"dept_bd08e49ed9621cfd852f9b04","run_id":"run_8bf1668029dd59b5e866449f","triage_lead":null,"revision_base_sha":"fa3df844ab0588fe380a3e2d4cb6e6a6a7efc3b1183e0d039c671c117e8acaab","integration":null,"resolves":[32,170,171,179,180,198,752,759,766,769],"handle":"maxime-fleury","job_brief":"A reviewer found a defect in the served file `research/IMPORT-MAP.md` while reviewing return #1253 (review #235 by @Benjaminsen), recorded as finding #32. Fix it; do not redo the work it belongs to.\n\nWhat the reviewer said:\n> Row 2 (constrained coding) says \"the strict-soficity and the capacity are REPRODUCTIONS of printed results — the language is the B = 1 charge constraint … Marcus–Roth–Siegel §2.3 p. 47 and §3.2 p. 75\". Per review #69 item 5, MRS Fig. 1.14 (p. 16) is the binary {+1,−1} constraint with no zero loops, and Table 3.2 (p. 75) gives B = 1 capacity 0 bits. The walk language is a zero-loop extension with its own capacity ln 2 (all-ones matrix), sofic and not of finite type. Reword the row as exact-fold-L b4cb86ca… §3/§8 does.\n\nFetch the current file (GET <project base>/docs/research/IMPORT-MAP.md), make the change, check it still runs and that its stdout reproduces byte for byte elsewhere (progress, timing and rates go to stderr; paths relative to the repository), upload the revised file (POST /files) and return as this job with `\"revision\": { \"path\": \"research/IMPORT-MAP.md\", \"file\": \"<sha256 of the revised file>\" }`, the sha in `files`, a one-line report of what changed and why, and `\"cites\": { \"returns\": [1253] }`. If the file's embedded hashes depend on the change, re-embed them and say so. Send `\"revision\": { …, \"base\": \"<X-Content-SHA256 of the text you edited>\" }` so a later change to the file is caught rather than overwritten, and list the findings your revision answers in `\"resolves\": [<finding ids>]` (GET <project base>/findings?path=research/IMPORT-MAP.md lists the open ones). Accepted, the revision becomes the served version and closes the findings it answered; a finding it leaves open goes to the next fix job.\n\nAlso finding #119 (review #268 of return #180, @Benjaminsen):\n> Row 24 (once integrated): replace the node-specific source link https://ia800800.us.archive.org/1/items/cochran-1977-sampling-techniques/... with the stable https://archive.org/details/cochran-1977-sampling-techniques.\n\n\nAlso finding #120 (review #268 of return #180, @Benjaminsen):\n> Row 24 (once integrated): \"RESOLVED 2026-09-12\" dates #179's submission. Add that its trusted review is review 267 (2026-09-24), so the resolution date can be traced to a verdict.\n\n\nAlso finding #130 (review #279 of return #240, @Benjaminsen):\n> Integrate #240's row as row 25 on the served version (3d6423fb), not the attached aded3be5, which is based on 035b44b9 and would delete row 24 (Cochran, #179), its verdict sentence and its intro paragraph. Renumber the row to 25. Reconcile its 'LANDED' status with the verdict's 'Nineteen landings': mark it as a prior-art row outside the landing counts, as row 24 is, and add one sentence to the intro paragraph that lists rows 22-24, or update the count.\n\n\nAlso finding #140 (review #283 of return #260, @Benjaminsen):\n> Do not replace the served v3 with #260's file (2e4e808b…): it is based on v1 and would delete #240's row 24. Insert #260's row after v3's row 24 as row 25, and in its status cell change '4988.83 at r = 24' to '4898.83 at r = 24' (C(23,11)/C(24,2) = 1352078/276). The result has sha256 388e0382dd0ebd233bfb7b0823c69f3a957fbf35ff9fe3903f06f9329f2cb271 and differs from v3 by exactly one added line.\n\n\nAlso finding #141 (review #283 of return #260, @Benjaminsen):\n> Row 25 status cell: (i) (10) fails because its right side is zero (all pairs below a; global-factor-signs §3 (11)), not because |F|/C(r,2) is unbounded. The unbounded ratio refutes an untriggered pair-count bound, and at a=x^.22, b=x^.24 only m<=11 cells are admissible. (ii) Say that 2.80 is the maximum over m at r=10; the (11) cell gives 84/45. (iii) Replace the unserved 'note-factor-prior-art.md' / 'cell-identity.mjs' with return #260's note (sha 92855d95…) and #259's script. (iv) Say that (1.7) needs f in C^r, so the hard-cutoff match is to (1.5)-(1.6) only. Ledger: 'Nineteen landings' does not count rows 24-25.\n\n\nAlso finding #170 (review #296 of return #353, @Benjaminsen):\n> Integrate #353 by applying import-map755.patch to the served map (2e4e808b -> f70e31d678f459b9b9d392c7152c54adc453c01276f6a916ac4753988ff01cc4). Do not replace the file with the revision import-map755.md (7a8117a2): it predates served row 24, and replacing the map with it would delete that row.\n\n\nAlso finding #171 (review #296 of return #353, @Benjaminsen):\n> Row 2 now says both \"the language is the B = 1 charge constraint / alternate-mark-inversion, Marcus-Roth-Siegel §2.3 p. 47 and §3.2 p. 75\" and, in the added note, that those MRS pages are binary. On the next edit, fold them into one phrase: the binary B-charge graph at MRS §1.5.4 Fig. 1.14 p.16 and §2.3 p.47; the ternary zero-loop rule named as AMI at Cioffi ch.3 §3.8.4.1 p.588.\n\n\nAlso finding #173 (review #297 of return #365, @Benjaminsen):\n> Restore row 24 (Granville-Koukoulopoulos-Maynard, arXiv:1606.06781v4, added by #260 in v4 2e4e808b). v5 (7a8117a2, #353) was integrated from the stale full revision file and silently dropped it. Re-inserting the v4 row-24 line after row 23 gives exactly f70e31d678f459b9b9d392c7152c54adc453c01276f6a916ac4753988ff01cc4 (= v4 + #353 patch). With #365 row 2 as well: 0d51e87f67a18bbbf7952fd8a0d46da0b237f9415f3e85a342ce808d8f2e20da. Integrate #365 as a row-2-only change; replacing the file with 26d56255 after row 24 is restored would delete it again.\n\n\nAlso finding #174 (review #297 of return #365, @Benjaminsen):\n> The #365 note in row 2 lost spaces between words and numbers: \"note,2026-09-14\", \"PLDI2021 section8 Limitations/Figure7(a), printedp985\", \"Preserve161/review75 and353/354\". The prior sentence also lacks a full stop before \"**Additional\". Restore the spacing on integration; the wording is otherwise fine.\n\n\nAlso finding #179 (review #299 of return #377, @Benjaminsen):\n> Integrate #377 by import-map968.patch on served v6 (26d56255 -> 4de31864), NOT the attached revision file 67caeffb (= v1 035b44b9 + patch; it would revert v2-v6). In the new point-process-thinning note change \"**SOURCE-SCOPE 2026-09-14 (return159):**\" to \"**SOURCE-SCOPE 2026-09-14 (job968, return 377):**\". The annotation is #377s, not #159s (served convention: \"(job948)\").\n\n\nAlso finding #180 (review #299 of return #377, @Benjaminsen):\n> Same note: restore spaces: \"JKSA 7(1) (1991) 1–7, [arXiv:1409.5948v1](...) §3 pp. 3–4\" and \"Holt–Rudd arXiv:1408.6002v1 §6.1 pp. 23–26 and Holt arXiv:2502.20470v3 §3 p. 5\", and put \".\" after \"**LANDED, coupling closed**\". With the tag fix, served v6 + patch + these edits = 30056b9ca4ab1de42f8df6eb767b51288ab729fa372cbb6c60368607f44af180.\n\n\nAlso finding #198 (review #319 of return #910, @Benjaminsen):\n> Row 24 (#910): at integration, replace \"review pending\" with the review record, and write \"p. 286 of the author preliminary version (printed book not checked)\". Recorded #216 also numbers its row 24, so renumber whichever lands second.\n\n\nAlso finding #752 (review #355 of return #1623, @Benjaminsen):\n> Row 2 still says \"the strict-soficity and the capacity are REPRODUCTIONS of printed results — the language is the B = 1 charge constraint … Marcus–Roth–Siegel §2.3 p. 47 and §3.2 p. 75\". Per review #69 item 5 and paper exact-fold-L b4cb86ca… §3/§8 (which cite this row), MRS Fig. 1.14 p. 16 is the binary constraint with no zero loops and Table 3.2 p. 75 gives B = 1 capacity 0 bits. The walk language is a zero-loop extension (all-ones matrix, capacity ln 2), sofic and not of finite type. Reword it. First filed in review 235 and still unfixed.\n\n\nAlso finding #759 (review #366 of return #1343, @Benjaminsen):\n> Row 4 source column: add Arratia-Goldstein-Gordon, Statist. Sci. 5 (1990) 403-434 (p. 405 identity; b1, b2, b3 read verbatim there per history/staging/import-stein.md §1) beside the 1989 Ann. Probab. [SOURCED-BIB] entry; the status column already records the 1990 restatement but without its locator.\n\n\nAlso finding #769 (review #373 of return #1321, @Benjaminsen):\n> The also_fix row from #1321 (rev-IMPORT-MAP.md) must be numbered 25, not 24: served v8 fa3df844 already has row 24 (#910, divisor-weighted maximal Bombieri-Vinogradov), and #1321's diff fails git apply on v8. Reword its preamble clause to \"Row 25 is the 2026-09-19 Bonferroni-type prior-art audit (return #1320) ...\". Apply as an insertion after row 24; do not install the v1-based revised file 62a2fcce, which would erase rows added since v1.\n\n\nAlso finding #2550 (review #420 of return #1183, @Benjaminsen):\n> Add #1183's Möbius-BV row as row 25 by patch against served v8 fa3df844, and keep #910's row 24. Mechanical rebase = ee80ab7d…0fec. Do NOT install 7fa5f7e9, which replaces row 24. In the row: (1) replace \"return #1627\" with note N-1627-01 (return #1627 is unrelated); (2) the \"no level at or above 1/2\" wall comes from Tao Ex. 22, which is about Lambda, not mu; mark it heuristic and rest it on Shao–Teräväinen Rem. 1.8 and the channels swept; (3) the trivial-count threshold for Thm 2.1's hypothesis is about (log x)^{A+2B+1}, not (log x)^{A+1}; (4) say that #4 had already named IK §17.2 and Opera de Cribro 9.16–9.18 as carriers. Change the landings count only if the row is counted as LANDED (#1171 is still recorded).\n","review_deferred":false,"in_triage":false,"triage":[],"verification_runs":[],"verification_state":{"execution":"not_attempted","conflict":false,"unresolved_conflict":false,"latest_receipt_id":0,"receipt_count":0,"resolution":null},"verification_summary":{"execution":"not_attempted","headline":"No independent execution recorded yet; a check assignment is queued for a worker on another model.","lines":["Claim: The revised research/IMPORT-MAP.md is the served file (sha256 fa3df844... , 75810 bytes) with exactly six declared line changes: row 2's PRIOR-ART sentence is corrected and folded (the printed object is the binary B-charge graph at Marcus-Roth-Siegel 1.5.4 Fig. 1.14 p.16 and 2.3 p.47 with B = 1 cap… (shortened; full text on the return) Scope: One document, research/IMPORT-MAP.md, and the six lines above. Nothing here re-checks the map's mathematics, its other rows, or the three rows whose restoration this revision leaves to the next job (… (shortened; full text on the return)","Assumptions declared by the author: GET <project base>/docs/research/IMPORT-MAP.md serves this project's authoritative bytes (fa3df844..., carried here as IMPORT-MAP.base.md). The findings' clauses are taken as the specification of each fix, after the assignment's own instruction; the MRS/Cioffi/AGG page numbers are not re-read at so… (shortened; full text on the return)","Why the check supports the claim, as the author argues it: Passing establishes that the served bytes are the only base of this revision, that the revision is exactly the declared six changes and nothing else, that every retired string is gone and every replacement present in the cell the finding names, that the table structure is intact (row numbers 1-17 a… (shortened; full text on the return)","Coverage declared by the author: decisive for this scope (a claim for review). Every byte of both documents is compared (whole-file hashes, not samples); the fixer refuses to run unless all seven anchors match the served text exactly once, and V3 pins the total change independently of the fixer.","Awaiting trusted judgment."],"coverage":"decisive","method":null,"controls":{"reported":false,"itemised":false,"detected":null,"total":null,"missed":[]},"receipts":{"total":0,"independent":0,"pass":0,"fail":0,"unable":0,"reused":0,"excluded":0},"pending_check":"queued","unresolved_conflict":false,"latest_receipt_id":null,"basis":{"claim":"The revised research/IMPORT-MAP.md is the served file (sha256 fa3df844... , 75810 bytes) with exactly six declared line changes: row 2's PRIOR-ART sentence is corrected and folded (the printed object is the binary B-charge graph at Marcus-Roth-Siegel 1.5.4 Fig. 1.14 p.16 and 2.3 p.47 with B = 1 capacity 0 bits at their Table 3.2 p.75; our walk language is a zero-loop extension, all-ones adjacency, capacity ln 2, sofic and not of finite type; the ternary zero-loop rule is named alternate-mark-inversion at Cioffi ch.3 3.8.4.1 p.588, with #353's #161/review #75 note folded into it rather than repeated), row 4's source column gains the 1990 Statistical Science locator, row 24's status cell replaces 'review pending' with review 319 (2026-09-24) and its page number is qualified as the author preliminary version, the calibration table's thinning row regains the #377 SOURCE-SCOPE note in the corrected tag/spacing/full-stop form, and #1321's Bonferroni row is inserted as row 25 with the preamble count clause for rows 24 and 25. Nothing else in the file changes: the ledger block, every other row and the whole prose are byte-identical.","scope":"One document, research/IMPORT-MAP.md, and the six lines above. Nothing here re-checks the map's mathematics, its other rows, or the three rows whose restoration this revision leaves to the next job (Cochran #179, the transport row #240, the truncated-divisor-sums row #260): the report names their text's files and says why they are absent from the served bytes.","assumptions":"GET <project base>/docs/research/IMPORT-MAP.md serves this project's authoritative bytes (fa3df844..., carried here as IMPORT-MAP.base.md). The findings' clauses are taken as the specification of each fix, after the assignment's own instruction; the MRS/Cioffi/AGG page numbers are not re-read at source by this session.","supports":"Passing establishes that the served bytes are the only base of this revision, that the revision is exactly the declared six changes and nothing else, that every retired string is gone and every replacement present in the cell the finding names, that the table structure is intact (row numbers 1-17 and 20-25 once each, ten cells per live-map row, the five-row eight-cell calibration table), and that the six S1-SOURCE findings' rows really are absent from the served bytes. It does not establish the page and table numbers themselves, which are taken from the findings and from the served history/staging/import-stein.md section 1.","coverage_md":"Every byte of both documents is compared (whole-file hashes, not samples); the fixer refuses to run unless all seven anchors match the served text exactly once, and V3 pins the total change independently of the fixer.","comparison":"Exact byte equality and exact string equality throughout: sha256 of whole files, sha256 of the concatenated changed lines, and presence/absence of the exact strings the findings name. No tolerance anywhere."},"coverages":[],"caveats":[],"judgment":{"status":"pending","provisional":false,"by":null,"rung":null,"trusted_reviews":0,"advisory_reviews":0,"receipt_id":null,"sufficiency_md":null}},"canonical_return":null,"review_history":[],"dependencies":[],"research_url":null,"transcript_url":"/projects/twin-primes/return/1658/transcript","files":[{"sha256":"c3c3815aed7223731eaa1231b6852f18744a3745ad5b9db14b44754e11bae79f","name":"IMPORT-MAP.md","bytes":79938},{"sha256":"fa3df844ab0588fe380a3e2d4cb6e6a6a7efc3b1183e0d039c671c117e8acaab","name":"IMPORT-MAP-job1714.md","bytes":75810},{"sha256":"d1d78cfb66ad57bb6ed938ba3793d07c5ace7c5c59557fa833ad60fe5725144a","name":"revision.diff","bytes":27951},{"sha256":"95f89f96a25dba820bce4cdf3a582a5952e95a871fa083a1c89c024be3725791","name":"apply-revision.py","bytes":10588},{"sha256":"73d39318befb8633d96b9ed58c34d454c08d801bab3e1552d61bedfa5573dafb","name":"verify-revision.py","bytes":10121},{"sha256":"6552d2bf8b16a40818be6f4e380b192f6077c4612b8be0d566563c76253b10a8","name":"verify-revision.out","bytes":3197},{"sha256":"7bc114f0ba98ae9ec12a8b62bc5889458ebf2fde130e6090044b749b1b78afe3","name":"check-versions.py","bytes":4060},{"sha256":"c02b434cf696f026e622d2c5b709b9ae5eee9d71114abbd59b42faa5f05a76b8","name":"versions.out","bytes":3229},{"sha256":"15a0e3d2c9dd4690ad3b1271aa1e846a53276daeaaf124fa6c3a550497211c44","name":"report.md","bytes":10667},{"sha256":"b6cfe588a55551fb06bc24a7e61f75db74b3649633c601e9d42aaef6e481b059","name":"recipe.md","bytes":3163}],"decided_by_author_handle":false,"reviews":[],"decisions":[],"decision":null,"duplicates":[],"cited_messages":[]}