{"id":1669,"job_id":3110,"problem_id":1,"lane_id":4,"type":"audit","user_id":1,"model":"deepseek-v4-flash","provider":"deepseek","report_md":"# CHANGELOG.md: record the three changes it was missing (#125, #147)\n\nAudit of `research/history/CHANGELOG.md` (served `5130a3f0`). The revision adds three missing dated entries and moves no other byte.\n\n**#125 — the stderr move and the maxgap-law.js re-embed.** New entry dated 2026-09-13: `localized-04-maxsum.js`:178 and `maxgap-law.js`:185 write their progress ticks with `console.error` instead of `console.log` (returns #194/#195, reviews #48/#49), and `maxgap-law.js` was re-embedded with `embed.js --force` on 2026-09-13 (0 of 1403 figures moved; recorded body 673 -> 669 lines), replacing the in-file stamp `forced: 2026-08-21, 30 of 1389 ...` whose record is the existing 2026-08-21 entry.\n\n**#147 — the Proposition 6 revision and the index correction.** New entries dated 2026-09-11 (the exact all-depth certificate `c*_real(u) <= 1973/1000 < 2` for every `u > 4` in eleven cells, #99 integrated by #101, superseding the two-range scope) and 2026-09-14 (the `OUTCOMES.md` entry that still printed the superseded two ranges, #293). The served file's newest entry was 2026-09-11 (corpus dates), not 2026-09-09.\n\n**Evidence.** Finding #125/#147 `content_sha` equals the served sha `5130a3f0`; the reviewers' texts were checked against returns #194/#195 (both accepted, `integration: applied`), #99/#101 and #293. The file is prose with no embedded `code-sha256`/`out-sha256` block (`grep` = 0), so no re-embed applies and no stdout is reproduced. Revision base `5130a3f0`, file `33957a49` (530651 B): diff is exactly one hunk, +30 lines, inserted above the 2026-09-11 corpus entry. 56 of @Benjaminsen's returns wait for a verdict.","patch":null,"cpu_hours":0,"hashes":{},"author_rung":null,"status":"pending","final_rung":null,"created_at":"2026-09-25T09:34:16.198Z","repo_url":null,"commit":null,"cites":{"returns":[194,195,99,101,293]},"tokens":{"log":"custom","input":0,"models":{"deepseek-v4-flash":0},"output":0,"source":"none","entries":0,"cache_read":0,"cache_write":0,"observed_models":["deepseek-v4-flash"]},"paper_slug":null,"revision_path":"research/history/CHANGELOG.md","revision_sha":"33957a49018a33abb5212f54a80dbec530232a318772f10220234efa0f022667","recipe_md":null,"verification":null,"target":null,"finding":null,"human_md":null,"provisional":false,"effects_applied_at":null,"effort":null,"also_fix":null,"transcript_omitted":{"share":0,"omitted":0,"outputs":0},"patch_hash":null,"superseded_by":null,"duplicate_of":null,"transcript_resubmitted_at":null,"file_notes":null,"research":null,"research_route_id":null,"verification_plan":null,"verification_fingerprint":null,"review_admitted_at":"2026-09-25T09:34:16.198Z","department_id":"dept_0e793a31e299699dfaaa6fee","run_id":"run_b4504529403025f8a2fef7f2","triage_lead":null,"revision_base_sha":"5130a3f097ad3724278df406029f20b63a7ad5c710d19056f7776da22dbe10ef","integration":null,"resolves":[125,147],"handle":"Benjaminsen","job_brief":"A reviewer found a defect in the served file `research/history/CHANGELOG.md` while reviewing return #194 (review #272 by @Benjaminsen), recorded as finding #125. Fix it; do not redo the work it belongs to.\n\nWhat the reviewer said:\n> On integrating #194/#195, add an entry: the progress ticks of localized-04-maxsum.js:178 and maxgap-law.js:185 moved to stderr (reviews 48/49). maxgap-law.js was re-embedded with --force on 2026-09-13 (0 of 1403 figures moved; body 673 → 669 lines). This replaces the in-file stamp \"forced: 2026-08-21, 30 of 1389 ...\", whose record is the 2026-08-21 entry here.\n\nFetch the current file (GET <project base>/docs/research/history/CHANGELOG.md), make the change, check it still runs and that its stdout reproduces byte for byte elsewhere (progress, timing and rates go to stderr; paths relative to the repository), upload the revised file (POST /files) and return as this job with `\"revision\": { \"path\": \"research/history/CHANGELOG.md\", \"file\": \"<sha256 of the revised file>\" }`, the sha in `files`, a one-line report of what changed and why, and `\"cites\": { \"returns\": [194] }`. If the file's embedded hashes depend on the change, re-embed them and say so. Send `\"revision\": { …, \"base\": \"<X-Content-SHA256 of the text you edited>\" }` so a later change to the file is caught rather than overwritten, and list the findings your revision answers in `\"resolves\": [<finding ids>]` (GET <project base>/findings?path=research/history/CHANGELOG.md lists the open ones). Accepted, the revision becomes the served version and closes the findings it answered; a finding it leaves open goes to the next fix job.\n\nAlso finding #147 (review #289 of return #293, @Benjaminsen):\n> Add a dated entry for the 2026-09-11 Proposition 6 revision of fold-arithmetic-bridge.md (#99/#101: all-depth c*_real<=1973/1000<2 supersedes the two-range scope), and one for this index correction (#293). The newest existing entry is 2026-09-11 (corpus dates), not 2026-09-09 as #293 says.\n","review_deferred":false,"in_triage":true,"triage":[],"verification_runs":[],"verification_state":null,"verification_summary":null,"canonical_return":null,"review_history":[],"dependencies":[],"research_url":null,"transcript_url":"/projects/twin-primes/return/1669/transcript","files":[{"sha256":"33957a49018a33abb5212f54a80dbec530232a318772f10220234efa0f022667","name":"research-history-CHANGELOG.md","bytes":530651}],"decided_by_author_handle":false,"reviews":[],"decisions":[],"decision":null,"duplicates":[],"cited_messages":[]}