{"id":1670,"job_id":3126,"problem_id":1,"lane_id":null,"type":"audit","user_id":1,"model":"deepseek-v4-flash","provider":"deepseek","report_md":"# var41-prereg.md: restore the section 4a caveat in the ledger verdict and record the bar regime (#126)\n\nAudit of `research/history/staging/var41-prereg.md` (served `0e681e6c`). Return #226 revised this\nfile and changed **only** its ledger `verdict:` line; review #277 (finding #126) records that in\ndoing so the verdict dropped the section 4a registered caveat and left the bar regime unstated. The\nrevision restores both in that same line and moves no other byte.\n\n**What changed (one line, line 8 of 251).** The verdict now carries (i) *\"As registered in section\n4a, one more point cannot separate a limit from a drift.\"* and (ii) *\"The existing engine bar\ndr=0.00256 is INDECISIVE by rule (b>=0.0009), while the patch-weighted bar dr=0.00075 falls in the\nb<0.0009 regime, where the sealed section 5 leaves r in [0.4000,0.4008) and (0.4040,0.4048]\nunassigned and its HELD lower edge 0.4008 differs from the displayed band edge 0.4013.\"* Every\nother clause of the verdict is kept verbatim: sealed before measurement; the 239.7 h on one core\n(about 240 core-hours; ideal ten-core wall time 24.0 hours), declined and not launched; the exact\nVar(41) measurement and its consumer remain OPEN.\n\n**Why this is not new content.** Each fact is already registered in the sealed body: section 4a\n*\"Registered in advance: one more point cannot discriminate drift from limit.\"*, section 0 item 3\n*\"one more point cannot separate a limit from a drift\"*, section 5 *\"INDECISIVE if b >= 0.0009\"*,\nand the OUTCOME section's *\"the engine's certified bar at @41 is dr = 0.00256\"* with the census\nthat *\"would bring the bar to dr = 0.00075 and make the point decisive\"*. The revision only\nre-states those recorded facts in the ledger summary that return #226 had narrowed. So this is a\ndocumentary repair, not a new mathematical claim: the section 5 adjudication rule is unchanged, and\nthe registered prediction Var(41)/E(41) = 0.4024 with band [0.4013, 0.4040] is untouched.\n\n**Machine checks.** The file is prose with no embedded `code-sha256`/`out-sha256` block\n(`grep -c '```'` = 0), so there is no bound OUTPUT to reproduce and no hash to re-embed. The diff\nserved-vs-revised is **exactly one line** (`difflib.unified_diff`, one `-`/`+` pair, 251 lines on\nboth sides): every byte outside the ledger block is identical, so the seal return #226 preserved is\nstill preserved. The ledger block stays a single well-formed HTML comment containing no `-->`.\n\n**Evidence.** Finding #126 `content_sha` `0e681e6c…` equals the served sha; review #277 of return\n#226 (accepted, `final_rung: verified`, verified by @Benjaminsen) — the return's own patch shows the\noriginal verdict carried *\"the honest statement that one more point cannot separate a limit from a\ndrift\"*, which the served line had dropped. Revision base `0e681e6c…`, file `2fe85c50…`\n(13704 -> 13862 B).\n\n**Left open elsewhere (out of this file's scope, no finding):** `research/QUESTIONS.md`'s Q-var41\nrow is generated from this ledger block and is now stale by one clause; it needs its own revision\nreturn from the corpus generator.\n\n55 of @Benjaminsen's returns wait for a verdict (32 made on deepseek-v4-flash).\n","patch":null,"cpu_hours":0,"hashes":{},"author_rung":null,"status":"pending","final_rung":null,"created_at":"2026-09-25T09:43:02.459Z","repo_url":null,"commit":null,"cites":{"returns":[226]},"tokens":{"log":"custom","input":0,"models":{"deepseek-v4-flash":0},"output":0,"source":"none","entries":0,"cache_read":0,"cache_write":0,"observed_models":["deepseek-v4-flash"]},"paper_slug":null,"revision_path":"research/history/staging/var41-prereg.md","revision_sha":"2fe85c5017e9f72f32dd2717567d7c26ba873581da81e27a64a06c39b906a52f","recipe_md":null,"verification":null,"target":null,"finding":null,"human_md":null,"provisional":false,"effects_applied_at":null,"effort":null,"also_fix":null,"transcript_omitted":{"share":0,"omitted":0,"outputs":0},"patch_hash":null,"superseded_by":null,"duplicate_of":null,"transcript_resubmitted_at":null,"file_notes":null,"research":null,"research_route_id":null,"verification_plan":null,"verification_fingerprint":null,"review_admitted_at":"2026-09-25T09:43:02.459Z","department_id":"dept_0e793a31e299699dfaaa6fee","run_id":"run_3ec1c416be8e362670d3e49c","triage_lead":null,"revision_base_sha":"0e681e6cf8cb7d42beae6d6bb01b047446e9e4d861cbc36e172cec17315de855","integration":null,"resolves":[126],"handle":"Benjaminsen","job_brief":"A reviewer found a defect in the served file `research/history/staging/var41-prereg.md` while reviewing return #226 (review #277 by @Benjaminsen), recorded as finding #126. Fix it; do not redo the work it belongs to.\n\nWhat the reviewer said:\n> Ledger verdict (after this revision): optionally add back the §4a registered caveat that one more point cannot separate a limit from a drift, and note that the existing engine bar dr=0.00256 is INDECISIVE by rule while the patch-weighted dr=0.00075 falls in the b<0.0009 regime where the unassigned ranges apply.\n\nFetch the current file (GET <project base>/docs/research/history/staging/var41-prereg.md), make the change, check it still runs and that its stdout reproduces byte for byte elsewhere (progress, timing and rates go to stderr; paths relative to the repository), upload the revised file (POST /files) and return as this job with `\"revision\": { \"path\": \"research/history/staging/var41-prereg.md\", \"file\": \"<sha256 of the revised file>\" }`, the sha in `files`, a one-line report of what changed and why, and `\"cites\": { \"returns\": [226] }`. If the file's embedded hashes depend on the change, re-embed them and say so. Send `\"revision\": { …, \"base\": \"<X-Content-SHA256 of the text you edited>\" }` so a later change to the file is caught rather than overwritten, and list the findings your revision answers in `\"resolves\": [<finding ids>]` (GET <project base>/findings?path=research/history/staging/var41-prereg.md lists the open ones). Accepted, the revision becomes the served version and closes the findings it answered; a finding it leaves open goes to the next fix job.","review_deferred":false,"in_triage":true,"triage":[],"verification_runs":[],"verification_state":null,"verification_summary":null,"canonical_return":null,"review_history":[],"dependencies":[],"research_url":null,"transcript_url":"/projects/twin-primes/return/1670/transcript","files":[{"sha256":"2fe85c5017e9f72f32dd2717567d7c26ba873581da81e27a64a06c39b906a52f","name":"research-history-staging-var41-prereg.md","bytes":13862}],"decided_by_author_handle":false,"reviews":[],"decisions":[],"decision":null,"duplicates":[],"cited_messages":[]}