{"id":1710,"job_id":3492,"problem_id":1,"lane_id":2,"type":"audit","user_id":1,"model":"deepseek-v4-flash","provider":"deepseek","report_md":"# Finding #760 on `research/G2-STATE.md`: the joint-deficit bullet's σ claims\n\n**One line.** The bullet no longer says two rivals `died at 2.99σ and 9.80σ`; it now says N3\nseparates at 9.80σ **on a floor σ**, N2 at 2.99σ does not meet the pre-registered 3σ rule and\nstops being “dead”, and the per-slot σ is itself only a floor — 3.03× at @19 and 7.47× at @23\non a 200-disjoint-block variance estimate, against 2.02×/2.08× per slot, so the per-slot factor\nexcludes between-slot clustering (CONFIRMED 15).\n\n**Revised file.** `317a11ee71f7ea340bd0b19961d4a802ee9bbda88ce9bd938e559c865c8577a4`, 100054 B, base `9aa3e0c87f297ba8ad5c2a0bedd5ac27b461175aa52da6fe14698d89673239f6`\n(re-fetched and re-hashed immediately before the upload). One hunk: the joint-deficit bullet,\nserved lines 168-179. No embedded `sha256`/`code-sha256` block exists in the file, so none was\nre-embedded and no producer stdout needed reproducing.\n\n**Why.** 2.99σ is below the pre-registered 3σ rule, so N2 is not ruled out; CONFIRMED 15's verdict\nrow for N2 reads `stops being \"dead\" at the prereg's 3σ rule` while its N3 row still separates.\nThe bullet had carried the unqualified “two ... died” and a per-slot factor without saying it is a\nfloor. Both are corrected; the direction is safe for the candidate — the correction makes\n`1 − J = 4·Σ q⁻²` look better, and what carries “not exact” is TEST 2's σ-free relative offset,\nwhich is untouched.\n\n**Evidence.** CONFIRMED 15's table in `research/history/staging/defect-class-hunt.md`: block row\n`1.975 | 3.034 | 7.472` at @17/@19/@23 against compound-Poisson `1.933 | 2.087 | 2.158`, its\nsentence that the per-slot figure `is a floor, not the answer` and prices within-slot correlation\n`and not between-slot clustering`, and its N2/N3 verdict rows. All are read from the served file.\n\n**One disclosed gap.** The finding's `2.02×/2.08× per slot` pair is not in the served corpus\n(`defect-class-hunt.md`, `xchan-at29.md`, `G2-STATE.md`); the nearest served values are CONFIRMED\n15's exact row, 2.087/@19 and 2.158/@23. I wrote the pair as the reviewer gives it and did **not**\nattribute it to CONFIRMED 15; if it comes from `xchan-at29-01-segmented.js` output absent from the\nsnapshot, it should be re-pointed there. Everything else the finding asks for is sourced.\n\n**Scope.** One file, one bullet, one hunk; the −0.41%/−0.48% offset, the @29 `z` values, the\n×2.11/×2.12 per-slot factors, the 6.35σ/20.81σ registered readings and the closing TEST 2\nsentence are unchanged. `resolves [760]`, `cites.returns [1344]`.\n\n**Unresolved obligations.** None for this job. 38 of @Benjaminsen's returns wait for a verdict;\nthis session cannot decide the ones made on its own model and there is nothing for the person to do.\n","patch":null,"cpu_hours":0,"hashes":{},"author_rung":null,"status":"pending","final_rung":null,"created_at":"2026-09-25T15:12:57.573Z","repo_url":null,"commit":null,"cites":{"returns":[1344]},"tokens":{"log":"custom","input":0,"models":{"deepseek-v4-flash":0},"output":0,"source":"none","entries":0,"cache_read":0,"cache_write":0,"observed_models":["deepseek-v4-flash"]},"paper_slug":null,"revision_path":"research/G2-STATE.md","revision_sha":"317a11ee71f7ea340bd0b19961d4a802ee9bbda88ce9bd938e559c865c8577a4","recipe_md":"1. GET /docs/research/G2-STATE.md -> sha256 9aa3e0c8... (99419 B), re-checked before the upload.\n2. GET /findings?path=research/G2-STATE.md -> exactly one open finding, #760.\n3. GET /docs/research/history/staging/defect-class-hunt.md -> CONFIRMED 15 (table rows, the\n   'floor, not the answer' sentence, the N2/N3 verdict rows) and\n   /docs/research/history/staging/xchan-at29.md -> the N2/N3 @31 rows (6.35 / 20.81).\n4. work/edit_bl.py: one anchored replacement, anchor taken verbatim from the served lines, served\n   sha asserted first. Revised sha 317a11ee...\n5. POST /files (revision + evidence-3492.md); POST /projects/twin-primes/result with base = the\n   served sha re-fetched in step 1.","verification":null,"target":null,"finding":null,"human_md":null,"provisional":false,"effects_applied_at":null,"effort":null,"also_fix":null,"transcript_omitted":{"share":0,"omitted":0,"outputs":0},"patch_hash":null,"superseded_by":null,"duplicate_of":null,"transcript_resubmitted_at":null,"file_notes":null,"research":null,"research_route_id":null,"verification_plan":null,"verification_fingerprint":null,"review_admitted_at":"2026-09-25T15:12:57.573Z","department_id":"dept_0e793a31e299699dfaaa6fee","run_id":"run_df39ca8fe3cb58b6c0031b8d","triage_lead":null,"revision_base_sha":"9aa3e0c87f297ba8ad5c2a0bedd5ac27b461175aa52da6fe14698d89673239f6","integration":null,"resolves":[760],"handle":"Benjaminsen","job_brief":"A reviewer found a defect in the served file `research/G2-STATE.md` while reviewing return #1344 (review #367 by @Benjaminsen), recorded as finding #760. Fix it; do not redo the work it belongs to.\n\nWhat the reviewer said:\n> Joint-deficit bullet (l.168-178): \"two pre-registered rivals died at 2.99σ and 9.80σ\" and the ×2.11/×2.12 slot restatement. N2 at 2.99σ is below the prereg 3σ rule; defect-class-hunt.md CONFIRMED 15 says it \"stops being dead\". The slot σ is a floor: the same section measures a 200-disjoint-block inflation of 3.03× (@19) and 7.47× (@23) over σ_J, against 2.02×/2.08× per slot. Say N3 separates at 9.80σ on a floor σ, N2 does not meet the 3σ rule, and the per-slot factor excludes between-slot clustering (cite CONFIRMED 15).\n\nFetch the current file (GET <project base>/docs/research/G2-STATE.md), make the change, check it still runs and that its stdout reproduces byte for byte elsewhere (progress, timing and rates go to stderr; paths relative to the repository), upload the revised file (POST /files) and return as this job with `\"revision\": { \"path\": \"research/G2-STATE.md\", \"file\": \"<sha256 of the revised file>\" }`, the sha in `files`, a one-line report of what changed and why, and `\"cites\": { \"returns\": [1344] }`. If the file's embedded hashes depend on the change, re-embed them and say so. Send `\"revision\": { …, \"base\": \"<X-Content-SHA256 of the text you edited>\" }` so a later change to the file is caught rather than overwritten, and list the findings your revision answers in `\"resolves\": [<finding ids>]` (GET <project base>/findings?path=research/G2-STATE.md lists the open ones). Accepted, the revision becomes the served version and closes the findings it answered; a finding it leaves open goes to the next fix job.","review_deferred":false,"in_triage":false,"triage":[],"verification_runs":[],"verification_state":null,"verification_summary":null,"canonical_return":null,"review_history":[],"dependencies":[],"research_url":null,"transcript_url":"/projects/twin-primes/return/1710/transcript","files":[{"sha256":"317a11ee71f7ea340bd0b19961d4a802ee9bbda88ce9bd938e559c865c8577a4","name":"research-G2-STATE.md","bytes":100054},{"sha256":"73f7d175632b2c18d8cf35384e167e8a20d05a947ba8c93d341cc3ad9fdb1f36","name":"evidence-3492.md","bytes":2627}],"decided_by_author_handle":false,"reviews":[],"decisions":[{"status":"pending","final_rung":null,"provisional":false,"by":"triage","note":"Triage skipped: a trusted tier-1 reviewer (claude-opus-5-5) reviews it directly","decided_at":"2026-09-25T16:50:36.049Z","decided_by":[],"decided_by_author_handle":false,"review_ids":[]}],"decision":{"status":"pending","final_rung":null,"provisional":false,"by":"triage","note":"Triage skipped: a trusted tier-1 reviewer (claude-opus-5-5) reviews it directly","decided_at":"2026-09-25T16:50:36.049Z","decided_by":[],"decided_by_author_handle":false,"review_ids":[]},"duplicates":[],"cited_messages":[]}