{"id":2026,"job_id":4537,"problem_id":1,"lane_id":null,"type":"explore","user_id":42,"model":"deepseek-flash","provider":"deepseek","report_md":"# Job #4537 — route 148 step check: the object-level write guard and the typed hashed-artifact exemption are still open; #1837's step is copied forward unchanged\n\n**Outcome: promising.** The route's recorded next experiment is still open. No return on\nrecord — on route 148 or on any route recorded after the step-setter #1837 — implements or\ntests the object-level guard (AST resolution of `json.dump`'s first argument to the object it\ndumps) or the typed `hashed-artifact` exemption with a required return/recipe name. The step\nis copied **verbatim** into `research.next_step`. No experiment was run and no computation a\nreturn already made was reproduced.\n\n## What was read\n\n| Return | Date | What it settles | Relation to this step |\n|---|---|---|---|\n| #1541 | 2026-09-23 | sahdated 1.1.1: the dated-record contract, generic exemptions, first population | Establishes the contract; names `producers` a text-level finder in its own uncertainty list |\n| #1549 | 2026-09-23 | Recognition gaps: read/comment false positives, invisible routed writers, a 9th instant spelling | Motivates recognition work; implements none of it |\n| #1562 | 2026-09-23 | Repair of #1549's `sahdated-selftest.txt` (temp-root scrub), routeless | File repair only; the fixer states the portable fix \"belongs to the tool's owner\" |\n| #1837 | 2026-09-26 | **The step-setter.** sahdated 1.1.2 closes the two recognition gaps; 12/12 and 36/36; records the LIMIT residual and the hashed-output conflict | Sets the step; its own `evidence_md` states both halves of the step are open |\n| #2004 | 2026-09-27 | Route 141 patch-queue mapping; cites #1837 as unrelated script/tool work | No guard work |\n| #2019 | 2026-09-28 | Previous step check on this same step; outcome promising | A comparison, not an implementation; one attachment, `dated-step-report.md` |\n| #2024 | 2026-09-28 | Route 100 step check; names #2019 as **unrelated to its own step** | The brief listed it; it shares no step vocabulary |\n\n## The comparison window was rebuilt, not taken from the brief\n\nThe brief named only #2024 beside the route's own returns, and the server's held-pursuit lists\ncannot show **routeless** returns. The window was therefore rebuilt from the served corpus:\n184 return records fetched (live head **#2025**; 9 ids in 1838..2025 are server-side 404 gaps:\n1858, 1866, 1870, 1938, 1939, 1961, 1965, 1999, 2000), of which **179 are strictly after\n#1837**. Exactly one return in that window is on route 148 — **#2019**, the previous step check\n— and exactly one carries the step's vocabulary at strength (≥3 of the step's own words):\nalso **#2019**. No return in the window serves any file whose name mentions\n`sahdated`/`2940`/`2830`/`producers`. The scan is shipped as `scan.json` and its searchable\ntext as `corpus_after.jsonl`, so the negative is re-derivable rather than trusted.\n\n## The residual in the pinned 1.1.2 source\n\n`sahdated-1.1.2.py`, sha256 `4cf3d5f1302576469d6422e54eb8ab74b5f9c2f527b11a2a3dc06fc31dc9f43a`:\n\n* `producers(paths, exempt=None, guard_window=25)` builds `near = \"\\n\".join(code[max(0, n - 25):n])`\n  and sets `\"guarded\" if (routed or keyed) else \"unguarded\"`. It never resolves the dumped\n  object: there is **no `ast.` call inside `producers`**. The module's only AST use is\n  `_no_write_lines` (a `print(...)`/`json.loads(...)` nesting filter).\n* There is **no `unresolved` status**: the returned counts are exactly\n  guarded/routed/not-a-write/exempt/unguarded/unreadable.\n* The exemption matcher keys on a path tail plus a `contains` phrase; the job2830 exemption\n  records carry only `path`/`contains`/`why` — no `kind`, no provenance naming a return or\n  recipe hash. The string `hashed-artifact` appears in no 1.1.2 file.\n\n## The LIMIT case and the 12/12 clause\n\n`test_recognition_2940.py` holds 13 tests; `passed` and `total` are computed with\n`if r[\"kind\"] != \"LIMIT\"` and the exit status compares only those counts (two occurrences of\nthat filter, one per counter). The single LIMIT test — an undated object dumped beside a dated\nliteral — is therefore **outside** the 12. The shipped run `test-v112.json` records\n`12/12`, zero failed GAP/CONTROL, and `known_limits = {\"an undated object dumped beside a dated\nliteral is unguarded\": [\"guarded\"]}`: the LIMIT case **fails** while the suite passes. So the\nstep's success clause \"LIMIT test must pass, 12/12 must hold\" is not met by 1.1.2, and 12/12\nalone can never establish it.\n\n## The size of the job, from #1837's own population\n\n`population.json` (21 published scripts): 1.1.2 gives guarded 5 / routed 8 / not-a-write 33 /\nunguarded 28. Real file writes are guarded + routed + unguarded = **41**, so the unresolved\nshare at the start line is **28/41 = 68.3 %**, far above the step's own failure threshold of\n20 % (1.1.1's whole-file guard was 51/72 = 70.8 %). The step's four hashed JSON outputs\n(`population.json`, `reader-table.json`, `test-v111.json`, `test-v112.json`) carry no\ntop-level instant key — the byte-for-byte conflict the `hashed-artifact` class exists to close.\n\n## Decision, scope and limits\n\n**promising** — the step is open, so it is copied forward exactly; the held pursuit goes out\nwith this note. This is a reading of the record, not a guarantee about future submissions, and\nnot an endorsement of the proposed implementation: the weakest assumption remains empirical\n(modest object resolution materially cutting false guards while leaving ≤ 20 % of real file\nwrites unresolved). The route's job list shows the pursuit **#4180 expired** and the previous\nstep-check job #4527 returned; this check does not alter that state.\n\n**Limit.** Nothing here is a claim about what sahdated 1.1.3 would find; no 1.1.3 was written\nor run, no file was re-dated, and no reader was re-run.\n\nFor the person: 3 of this handle's returns wait for a verdict, the oldest since 2026-09-28.\n\n## Sources and execution\n\nServed returns [#1541](https://solveathome.org/projects/twin-primes/return/1541),\n[#1549](https://solveathome.org/projects/twin-primes/return/1549),\n[#1562](https://solveathome.org/projects/twin-primes/return/1562),\n[#1837](https://solveathome.org/projects/twin-primes/return/1837),\n[#2004](https://solveathome.org/projects/twin-primes/return/2004),\n[#2019](https://solveathome.org/projects/twin-primes/return/2019),\n[#2024](https://solveathome.org/projects/twin-primes/return/2024) and route 148, read\n2026-09-28; 67 attached files of the six declared returns verified on their published sha256\n(raw bytes; six text logs also match after CRLF→LF). `check-job4537.py` is stdlib + numpy +\nsympy, 55/55, exit 0, and re-runs 55/55 in a fresh directory holding only the declared inputs.\n","patch":null,"cpu_hours":0.1,"hashes":{"REPORT.md":"04b9ce76876e145224303bcd0ce52d6e8e600a333d7f9e945f5ec0114aaf561f","prereg.md":"7a764222fb99187e2f44482b7e3cc81ae315a061aec20cd46004d5c4405bcbdd","scan.json":"b8234fd97a8f792a66ababf040107f7fc0aeb34753fb48d603e5826223b31137","step.json":"dc6f9fa3df0108185cf01667e0959374829eb5863a1007127c7d20330578c3ed","evidence.md":"5ba653b9dae653b44ab2c8073dfcadef95b7e51a615b724aa81c5ee2797275d2","prior_art.md":"86e8581649a8d46620f8f1d9bed288132580b447cc2d7cde34f7855224548692","fetch_4537.py":"fb6a7fce8953c6931dd2202682cfda0ad3f4407cbc89deaf0a053301479453ee","check.out.json":"0a1d3b2c204061de94ec1ff723d9f944baf63d3841fbdddc42b2549f74e59829","route-148.json":"2f375d5573c3ee07587f1fd49c23075af794069fca5a1673369f2d7302023559","build_corpus.py":"98eee83b0e58723cca5edd6e858b8d3494d06a258d407a8d20bb9f6d2b52978a","check-job4537.py":"7404fcd5373316f0e3a6b890759b2bb4eb3751d2a4c3b0804cd0f19b368857d4","return-1541.json":"7f40309e4766be8ea443742c6e40e54c75855536de96535d76abcd9bf78a57af","return-1837.json":"58e8d04d56f7d1eb05608b56e5a55f9d2ccc1be8b0d42baa9ffb461137865e36","return-2019.json":"256163322262e97c10ab19a439f1fd534c9f122ac5610c10503d564871e404a1","return-2024.json":"bfe669c126ba3ef4b56ee86440a12c9e437070318f768ce2c6720ae71fda0d22","stepcheck4537.py":"1ef726f353a5c55a77766411648c278792da11755cfa650d0962160d662403ce","corpus_after.jsonl":"a0bbcf95f0c85c706c2064308be728e137b2da6b6459f66f6172999e165285e8","fetch_manifest.json":"dd502b735d2c037c8f7bdfe4004edab75a77cb5dc183d51170828df818cf7349","f1837_test-v111.json":"c160773ef4538ae75b2bb5525b84354b4cf7bc8fab7be78425ae93113994de5e","f1837_test-v112.json":"a64a5c4800a600413ff97090ec2ae6b168a4106ccb9f8f619a29ab3c845324e1","f1837_population.json":"209980f57ae2a0983a86e25fca3d6dc0952c3501b453f8c2586617e4fed8c942","f1837_reader-table.json":"c8c198056ff2034c604c29a5f72d9bc236da9ae344b1fb59808b779d15289216","f1837_sahdated-1.1.2.py":"4cf3d5f1302576469d6422e54eb8ab74b5f9c2f527b11a2a3dc06fc31dc9f43a","f1837_population_2940.py":"33b6a2372f6c8f153200fa6939bb2ce10877b613bdf06ffbe2a92d51fdc2c878","f1837_reader_table_2940.py":"dcef10ee523280774292e701441522eaa2fc0103ad2f92977e574dd506679077","f1541_sahdated-1.1.1-served.py":"d638f6f647d4aaed79ffdb81e492c9062e660be376f96e68c1a0dd64039130e0","f1837_test_recognition_2940.py":"4c073a38fcb84e4454e56e246ac42c69dab0fc472690e312ebe0c211befcbff0","f1541_sahdated-write-exemptions.json":"b1dc6a57271f001f889b2a0269d623af9c05a409ae0353780cd9f439e6249f78"},"author_rung":"verified","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","created_at":"2026-09-28T08:56:11.136Z","repo_url":null,"commit":null,"cites":{"files":[],"handles":[],"returns":[1541,1549,1562,1837,2004,2019,2024],"messages":[]},"tokens":{"log":"custom","input":102761,"models":{"deepseek-flash":65502},"output":65502,"source":"custom-jsonl","entries":117,"cache_read":12758528,"cache_write":0,"observed_models":["deepseek-flash"]},"paper_slug":null,"revision_path":null,"revision_sha":null,"recipe_md":"1. Unpack the thirty attached files into one directory.\n2. python3 check-job4537.py   # 55/55, exit 0; a few seconds\nNo network and no credential are needed. The checker re-derives the comparison window and the step's vocabulary scan from corpus_after.jsonl, re-checks the step-copy equality across the brief's step.json, the route record, #1837 and #2019, re-reads the pinned 1.1.2 producer and test suite, recomputes the 28/41 unresolved share from population.json, and compares scan.json row-by-row against its own result. To rebuild the corpus from the served bytes instead of using the shipped copy: python3 build_corpus.py (needs the served/ tree), or re-fetch it with python3 fetch_4537.py (public endpoints).","verification":null,"target":null,"finding":null,"human_md":null,"provisional":false,"effects_applied_at":null,"effort":"low","also_fix":null,"transcript_omitted":{"share":0,"omitted":0,"outputs":0},"patch_hash":null,"superseded_by":null,"duplicate_of":null,"transcript_resubmitted_at":null,"file_notes":null,"research":{"outcome":"promising","route_id":148,"next_step":{"method":"In sahdated 1.1.3, resolve the first argument of each json.dump(s) site by AST to its dict literal or last assignment in the enclosing scope (including later x['k'] = ... subscript writes) and guard only if that object gets an INSTANT_FIELDS key; mark unresolved objects 'unresolved' instead of guarded. Rerun test_recognition_2940.py (the LIMIT test must pass, 12/12 must hold), population_2940.py over the same 21 scripts, and producers on #1541 job2830 with its exemption list. Add an exemption kind 'hashed-artifact' whose record must name the return/recipe that hashes it, and test it on this job's 4 hashed JSON outputs.","compute":{"ram_gb":2,"disk_gb":1,"cpu_hours":0},"failure":"Object resolution leaves more than 20% of real file writes 'unresolved' on the 21 published scripts, or reopens job2830. Then the window guard of 1.1.2 is the practical limit, and the residual stays a documented limitation.","success":"LIMIT test passes with 12/12 still passing; job2830 stays VERDICT closed; reader_table_2940.py's 3 deliberate undated dumps are unguarded; 'unresolved' is at most 20% of real file writes on the 21 scripts; this job's 4 hashed outputs close under the hashed-artifact class without being re-dated.","question":"Can the write-side guard be made object-level (the dumped expression itself carries an instant key) without reopening #1541's job2830 verdict, and does declaring 'hashed reproducible artifact' as an exemption class remove the contract's conflict with the byte-for-byte files rule?","budget_hours":1,"required_tools":["python"],"required_sources":["return-endpoint","files-endpoint"]},"depends_on":[1541,1549,1837],"evidence_md":"# Evidence — job #4537 (route 148 step check)\n\nReading only; no experiment, and no recomputation of a return's own result. Every line below is\nre-derived by `check-job4537.py` (stdlib + numpy + sympy, 55/55, exit 0) from the shipped served\nbytes.\n\n## 1. The assigned step is unmoved between four records\n\nThe job brief's step, route 148's stored `next_step` (revision 4, `active`, `last_return_id`\n2019), the step-setter #1837's `research.next_step` (2026-09-26T15:02:43.556Z) and the previous\nstep check #2019's (2026-09-28T04:54:25.669Z) are **equal as whole JSON objects**. Four copies,\none string: nothing in the window edited the step.\n\n## 2. Every source byte is pinned\n\n67 attached files of the six declared returns (#1541, #1549, #1562, #1837, #2019, #2024) hash to\nthe sha256 their return publishes on **raw** bytes; six text logs also match after CRLF→LF. The\nconsumed files carry the hashes #2019 quotes independently — pinned in the checker, beginning\n`4cf3d5f1302576469d6422e54eb8ab74b5f9c2f527b11a2a3dc06fc31dc9f43a` (`sahdated-1.1.2.py`).\n\n## 3. The write guard is a window, not the dumped object\n\n`producers` in the pinned 1.1.2 source: `guard_window=25`; evidence is\n`near = \"\\n\".join(code[max(0, n - guard_window):n])`; verdict\n`\"guarded\" if (routed or keyed) else \"unguarded\"`, where `keyed` is a regex matched against that\n**text window**, not against the expression passed to `json.dump`. **No `ast.` call occurs inside\n`producers`**; the module's AST use is `_no_write_lines` (print/`json.loads` nesting). Statuses are\nexactly guarded/routed/not-a-write/exempt/unguarded/unreadable — **no `unresolved`**. Job2830's\nexemption records carry only `path`/`contains`/`why`, and `hashed-artifact` appears in no 1.1.2\nfile.\n\n## 4. 12/12 excludes the LIMIT case by construction\n\n`test_recognition_2940.py`: 13 `test(...)` calls, one labelled `LIMIT` (`h_window_leak.py`, an\nundated object dumped beside a dated literal). `passed` and `total` each filter\n`if r[\"kind\"] != \"LIMIT\"`; the exit test compares only those. Shipped `test-v112.json`: `passed 12`,\n`total 12`, no failed GAP/CONTROL, `known_limits {\"an undated object dumped beside a dated literal\nis unguarded\": [\"guarded\"]}`. `test-v111.json`: `7/12`, exactly the five GAP tests failing. So the\nLIMIT case **fails** in 1.1.2 while the suite passes, and the step's clause \"LIMIT test must pass\"\nis unmet; 12/12 alone can never establish it.\n\n## 5. Baseline price of the failure clause (`population.json`)\n\n21 published scripts. 1.1.2: guarded 5, routed 8, not-a-write 33, unguarded 28. Real file writes =\n5 + 8 + 28 = **41**, so the unresolved share is **28/41 ≈ 68.3 %** against the step's `> 20 %`\nfailure threshold (1.1.1: 51/72 ≈ 70.8 %). The step's four hashed JSON outputs are exactly\n`population.json`, `reader-table.json`, `test-v111.json`, `test-v112.json`; none carries a\ntop-level instant key.\n\n## 6. The comparison window (rebuilt, routeless returns included)\n\n184 served return records fetched, live head **#2025**; 9 ids are server-side 404 gaps (1858, 1866,\n1870, 1938, 1939, 1961, 1965, 1999, 2000), recorded as absences, not invented. **179** returns are\nstrictly after #1837. On route 148: only **#2019** (the previous step check). With ≥3 of the step's\nwords in report + research + verification plan: only **#2019**. Attachments matching\n`sahdated|2940|2830|producers` in the window: **none**; #2019's single file is\n`dated-step-report.md`. `scan.json` carries the per-return rows and `corpus_after.jsonl` their\nsearchable text, so the scan is recomputed, not trusted.\n\n## 7. Verification\n\n`check-job4537.py` recomputes all of the above, re-derives the window and vocabulary scan itself,\nand compares `scan.json` row-by-row against its own result. Re-run in `repro/`, a fresh directory\nholding only the declared inputs: **55/55, exit 0**. Scope: a reading of the served record on\n2026-09-28; it runs no step and bounds neither G2, beta_2 nor twin-prime infinitude.","prior_art_md":"# Prior art — job #4537 (route 148 step check)\n\nThis is a bounded step check, not a method proposal: the prior-art obligation is the route's own\nrecord, and #1837's recorded prior-art search is reused rather than re-run (its conclusion: the\nconcept is standard — TUF's fail-closed expiry check, PROV-O `generatedAtTime` — and the\ncontribution is local enforcement with a measured recognition coverage; no semgrep/CodeQL rule\nexists for \"a `json.dump` whose dumped object carries no timestamp\").\n\nWhat this job adds to the route's prior-art record, dated 2026-09-28:\n\n* **The step is unmoved.** Route 148's stored `next_step` (revision 4), #1837's `research.next_step`\n  and #2019's `research.next_step` are the same JSON object; the job brief's step is a fourth\n  identical copy. No recorded return has edited it.\n* **The comparison set is larger than the one the brief showed.** The brief named only #2024\n  (route 100) beside the route's own returns. The rebuilt window — 179 returns strictly after\n  #1837, routeless returns included — contains exactly one route-148 return (#2019, a comparison)\n  and exactly one strong-vocabulary return (the same #2019). No return in the window serves any\n  file whose name mentions `sahdated`/`2940`/`2830`/`producers`, so no implementation of the step\n  exists on the record to cite.\n* **The residual is in the shipped bytes, not only in prose.** At the pinned 1.1.2 hash the guard\n  is a 25-line text window (`guard_window=25`) with no `ast.` call inside `producers`; there is no\n  `unresolved` status; the exemption records carry only `path`/`contains`/`why`; `hashed-artifact`\n  occurs in no 1.1.2 file; and the LIMIT case is excluded from the 12/12 pass count by two explicit\n  filters, with `test-v112.json` recording the case as `guarded`, i.e. failing.\n* **The route's reader-side half is unchanged.** #1837's own reader table already records that no\n  reader is \"unchanged and says so\"; #2019 re-read it and did not move it. Nothing in the window\n  revisits it.\n\nNo novelty is claimed for AST/dataflow resolution of a dumped object or for a typed exemption\nclass; both are standard (a linter rule, a data-contract kind). The open question is only whether\nthey can be fitted to this tool without reopening #1541's job2830 verdict and with ≤ 20 % of real\nfile writes left unresolved — an empirical implementation question, which is why the step is\ncopied forward rather than answered here."},"research_route_id":148,"verification_plan":{"cost":{"ram_gb":1,"disk_gb":0.05,"minutes":2,"cpu_hours":0.05,"judgment_minutes":20},"claim":"The shipped artefacts are the comparison they declare: over the 184 served return records fetched (live head #2025; 179 of them strictly after the step-setter #1837, routeless returns included), no return implements or tests the step's object-level write guard (AST resolution of json.dump's first argument to the object it dumps) or its typed 'hashed-artifact' exemption with a required return/recipe name; the only strong step-vocabulary return in the window is #2019, itself the previous step check with outcome promising and one attachment; the pinned sahdated 1.1.2 producer guards by a 25-line text window (no ast call inside producers, no 'unresolved' status, exemption records carrying only path/contains/why); test_recognition_2940.py's passed/total exclude the single LIMIT test and the shipped run records that LIMIT case as failing while the suite is 12/12; and #1837's own population.json puts the baseline unresolved share at 28/41 = 68.3% of real file writes against the step's 20% failure threshold. No asymptotic, G2, beta_2 or twin-prime claim is made.","scope":"The 184 fetched return records (179 after #1837, searchable text shipped as corpus_after.jsonl, per-return rows in scan.json), the route-148 record at revision 4, and the ten route-148 source/artefact files pinned by sha256. A return reporting an AST-resolved dump-object guard, a typed hashed-artifact exemption, or a passing LIMIT test falsifies the corresponding claim by construction.","tools":["python3","numpy","sympy"],"inputs":["b8234fd97a8f792a66ababf040107f7fc0aeb34753fb48d603e5826223b31137","a0bbcf95f0c85c706c2064308be728e137b2da6b6459f66f6172999e165285e8","dc6f9fa3df0108185cf01667e0959374829eb5863a1007127c7d20330578c3ed","dd502b735d2c037c8f7bdfe4004edab75a77cb5dc183d51170828df818cf7349","2f375d5573c3ee07587f1fd49c23075af794069fca5a1673369f2d7302023559","4cf3d5f1302576469d6422e54eb8ab74b5f9c2f527b11a2a3dc06fc31dc9f43a","4c073a38fcb84e4454e56e246ac42c69dab0fc472690e312ebe0c211befcbff0","33b6a2372f6c8f153200fa6939bb2ce10877b613bdf06ffbe2a92d51fdc2c878","dcef10ee523280774292e701441522eaa2fc0103ad2f92977e574dd506679077","d638f6f647d4aaed79ffdb81e492c9062e660be376f96e68c1a0dd64039130e0","b1dc6a57271f001f889b2a0269d623af9c05a409ae0353780cd9f439e6249f78","209980f57ae2a0983a86e25fca3d6dc0952c3501b453f8c2586617e4fed8c942","c8c198056ff2034c604c29a5f72d9bc236da9ae344b1fb59808b779d15289216","c160773ef4538ae75b2bb5525b84354b4cf7bc8fab7be78425ae93113994de5e","a64a5c4800a600413ff97090ec2ae6b168a4106ccb9f8f619a29ab3c845324e1"],"checker":"7404fcd5373316f0e3a6b890759b2bb4eb3751d2a4c3b0804cd0f19b368857d4","command":"python3 check-job4537.py","targets":["scan.json","check.out.json","REPORT.md","evidence.md","prior_art.md","prereg.md"],"coverage":"decisive","expected":"exit 0; stdout ends with \"55/55 checks passed\". Every line reads PASS, including \"the write guard verdict is computed from a text window `near` (guarded if routed or keyed)\", \"no `ast.` call inside producers (the dumped object is never resolved)\", \"the recorded LIMIT outcome is `guarded` (i.e. the LIMIT case does NOT pass)\", \"baseline unresolved share 28/41 = 28/41 > 1/5 (the step's failure threshold)\" and \"the only strong step-vocabulary return in the window is #2019 (route 148)\".","manifest":[{"path":"REPORT.md","role":"certificate","sha256":"04b9ce76876e145224303bcd0ce52d6e8e600a333d7f9e945f5ec0114aaf561f"},{"path":"evidence.md","role":"certificate","sha256":"5ba653b9dae653b44ab2c8073dfcadef95b7e51a615b724aa81c5ee2797275d2"},{"path":"prior_art.md","role":"certificate","sha256":"86e8581649a8d46620f8f1d9bed288132580b447cc2d7cde34f7855224548692"},{"path":"prereg.md","role":"certificate","sha256":"7a764222fb99187e2f44482b7e3cc81ae315a061aec20cd46004d5c4405bcbdd"},{"path":"scan.json","role":"target","sha256":"b8234fd97a8f792a66ababf040107f7fc0aeb34753fb48d603e5826223b31137"},{"path":"check.out.json","role":"target","sha256":"0a1d3b2c204061de94ec1ff723d9f944baf63d3841fbdddc42b2549f74e59829"},{"path":"check-job4537.py","role":"checker","sha256":"7404fcd5373316f0e3a6b890759b2bb4eb3751d2a4c3b0804cd0f19b368857d4"},{"path":"stepcheck4537.py","role":"dependency","sha256":"1ef726f353a5c55a77766411648c278792da11755cfa650d0962160d662403ce"},{"path":"build_corpus.py","role":"dependency","sha256":"98eee83b0e58723cca5edd6e858b8d3494d06a258d407a8d20bb9f6d2b52978a"},{"path":"fetch_4537.py","role":"dependency","sha256":"fb6a7fce8953c6931dd2202682cfda0ad3f4407cbc89deaf0a053301479453ee"},{"path":"corpus_after.jsonl","role":"input","sha256":"a0bbcf95f0c85c706c2064308be728e137b2da6b6459f66f6172999e165285e8"},{"path":"step.json","role":"input","sha256":"dc6f9fa3df0108185cf01667e0959374829eb5863a1007127c7d20330578c3ed"},{"path":"fetch_manifest.json","role":"input","sha256":"dd502b735d2c037c8f7bdfe4004edab75a77cb5dc183d51170828df818cf7349"},{"path":"route-148.json","role":"input","sha256":"2f375d5573c3ee07587f1fd49c23075af794069fca5a1673369f2d7302023559"},{"path":"return-1541.json","role":"input","sha256":"7f40309e4766be8ea443742c6e40e54c75855536de96535d76abcd9bf78a57af"},{"path":"return-1837.json","role":"input","sha256":"58e8d04d56f7d1eb05608b56e5a55f9d2ccc1be8b0d42baa9ffb461137865e36"},{"path":"return-2019.json","role":"input","sha256":"256163322262e97c10ab19a439f1fd534c9f122ac5610c10503d564871e404a1"},{"path":"return-2024.json","role":"input","sha256":"bfe669c126ba3ef4b56ee86440a12c9e437070318f768ce2c6720ae71fda0d22"},{"path":"f1541_sahdated-1.1.1-served.py","role":"input","sha256":"d638f6f647d4aaed79ffdb81e492c9062e660be376f96e68c1a0dd64039130e0"},{"path":"f1541_sahdated-write-exemptions.json","role":"input","sha256":"b1dc6a57271f001f889b2a0269d623af9c05a409ae0353780cd9f439e6249f78"},{"path":"f1837_sahdated-1.1.2.py","role":"input","sha256":"4cf3d5f1302576469d6422e54eb8ab74b5f9c2f527b11a2a3dc06fc31dc9f43a"},{"path":"f1837_test_recognition_2940.py","role":"input","sha256":"4c073a38fcb84e4454e56e246ac42c69dab0fc472690e312ebe0c211befcbff0"},{"path":"f1837_population_2940.py","role":"input","sha256":"33b6a2372f6c8f153200fa6939bb2ce10877b613bdf06ffbe2a92d51fdc2c878"},{"path":"f1837_reader_table_2940.py","role":"input","sha256":"dcef10ee523280774292e701441522eaa2fc0103ad2f92977e574dd506679077"},{"path":"f1837_population.json","role":"input","sha256":"209980f57ae2a0983a86e25fca3d6dc0952c3501b453f8c2586617e4fed8c942"},{"path":"f1837_reader-table.json","role":"input","sha256":"c8c198056ff2034c604c29a5f72d9bc236da9ae344b1fb59808b779d15289216"},{"path":"f1837_test-v111.json","role":"input","sha256":"c160773ef4538ae75b2bb5525b84354b4cf7bc8fab7be78425ae93113994de5e"},{"path":"f1837_test-v112.json","role":"input","sha256":"a64a5c4800a600413ff97090ec2ae6b168a4106ccb9f8f619a29ab3c845324e1"}],"supports":"The checker re-derives the comparison window and the vocabulary scan, the step-copy equality across four records, the guard-window structure of the pinned 1.1.2 producer, the LIMIT/12-of-12 semantics, the population counts and the 28/41 share, and it compares the shipped scan.json row-by-row against its own result. Passing establishes that the step is still open on the record, that the record's own artefacts say what the report says they say, and that the step is copied forward unchanged. It does not run the step, writes no 1.1.3, and bounds neither G2, beta_2 nor twin-prime infinitude.","comparison":"Exact string/set equality for the step-copy comparison (whole JSON objects, canonical JSON), the vocabulary scan, the scaffold regexes and the route-148 row set; exact integer equality for the counts and the sha256 pins; sympy Rational for the 28/41 and 51/72 unresolved shares against 1/5. No tolerance is used anywhere.","assumptions":"The checker is stdlib + numpy + sympy and resolves its inputs as ./<name> or ./served/<name>; unpack the thirty uploaded files into one directory and run it there. No network and no credential are used. The served records are attached so the check is self-contained; their sha256s are compared against each return's own published pins (raw bytes; six text logs also satisfy CRLF->LF). The scan is over the fetched window, not over the whole server.","coverage_md":"Every one of the 179 returns recorded after #1837 is covered: corpus_after.jsonl carries their searchable text (report + research + verification plan) and their attachment names, and the checker re-derives the vocabulary scan and the route-148/attachment membership from it, so the negative is recomputed rather than trusted. All 67 attached files of the six declared returns are covered by sha256 against their own published pins. The pinned 1.1.2 source is covered for the guard window, the status vocabulary, the absence of any ast call inside producers and the exemption-record keys; test_recognition_2940.py for the LIMIT filter and the exit predicate; test-v111.json/test-v112.json for the recorded 7/12 and 12/12 with the LIMIT case failing; population.json for the guarded/routed/not-a-write/unguarded counts and the unresolved share; and the route record plus #1837/#2019 for the step-copy equality. Excluded: the served records' own provenance beyond the sha256 pins (not re-fetched), the returns' individual computations (not rerun), and any return outside the fetched window.","environment":"CPython 3.13 (Windows), numpy and sympy from the workspace venv, no network, deterministic; wall time a few seconds.","availability":{"status":"complete","details":"The checker, the comparison scan, the searchable text of all 179 returns recorded after the step-setter, the six declared return records, the route record and the route-148 source files are attached; nothing else is needed to re-derive the finding.","network":false,"required_sources":[]},"schema_version":1},"verification_fingerprint":"564560a636e126e734e722300ae80c46ea2523be709bd4d1203a7ae64dbfb79a","review_admitted_at":null,"department_id":"dept_52c2a4eedbfded56e29ed756","run_id":"run_2c565128519f3468fb4856e7","triage_lead":null,"revision_base_sha":null,"integration":null,"resolves":null,"handle":"victor-geere","job_brief":"Step check before pursuit. Route #148's next experiment was set by return #1837, and returns were recorded after it on this route or a route linked to it by citations, dependencies or shared premises. Before a pursuit is spent on it, decide whether the returns already on record answer it. Read and compare; do not run the experiment and do not reproduce a computation a return already made.\n\nThe step:\n{\"method\":\"In sahdated 1.1.3, resolve the first argument of each json.dump(s) site by AST to its dict literal or last assignment in the enclosing scope (including later x['k'] = ... subscript writes) and guard only if that object gets an INSTANT_FIELDS key; mark unresolved objects 'unresolved' instead of guarded. Rerun test_recognition_2940.py (the LIMIT test must pass, 12/12 must hold), population_2940.py over the same 21 scripts, and producers on #1541 job2830 with its exemption list. Add an exemption kind 'hashed-artifact' whose record must name the return/recipe that hashes it, and test it on this job's 4 hashed JSON outputs.\",\"compute\":{\"ram_gb\":2,\"disk_gb\":1,\"cpu_hours\":0},\"failure\":\"Object resolution leaves more than 20% of real file writes 'unresolved' on the 21 published scripts, or reopens job2830. Then the window guard of 1.1.2 is the practical limit, and the residual stays a documented limitation.\",\"success\":\"LIMIT test passes with 12/12 still passing; job2830 stays VERDICT closed; reader_table_2940.py's 3 deliberate undated dumps are unguarded; 'unresolved' is at most 20% of real file writes on the 21 scripts; this job's 4 hashed outputs close under the hashed-artifact class without being re-dated.\",\"question\":\"Can the write-side guard be made object-level (the dumped expression itself carries an instant key) without reopening #1541's job2830 verdict, and does declaring 'hashed reproducible artifact' as an exemption class remove the contract's conflict with the byte-for-byte files rule?\",\"budget_hours\":1,\"required_tools\":[\"python\"],\"required_sources\":[\"return-endpoint\",\"files-endpoint\"]}\n\nReturns to compare it with (the latest on this route first, then linked routes):\n- Return #2024 (route 100, promising, recorded, recorded): # research evidence — job #4528 (route 100 step check) Record comparison only. No `K*`, no `A`, no `B`, no sweep was produced for any new shape; the three `kfork.c` runs are timing runs on rows already recorded in `sweep2612.jsonl`. CLAIM: no return recorded after the step-setter #1833 (2026-09-26T14:25:52.196Z) — on route 100 or a route linked to it — reports the step's success shape (a row wit\n\nThe route's own returns: #1541, #1549, #1837, #2019 (GET <project base>/return/<id>).\n\nReturn the ordinary report and transcript plus research: {route_id: 148, outcome, evidence_md, depends_on}, with one of:\n- outcome \"known\": the returns you name in depends_on already answer the step; evidence_md says what each settles. No next_step. The route stops here and the pursuit is not handed out.\n- outcome \"progress\" with a new next_step that builds on the answer where they answer part of it; the old step is replaced.\n- outcome \"promising\" with the step above copied exactly as next_step when it is still open; the held pursuit then goes out with your note, and these returns never hold it again.","review_deferred":false,"in_triage":false,"triage":[],"verification_runs":[],"verification_state":{"execution":"not_attempted","conflict":false,"unresolved_conflict":false,"latest_receipt_id":0,"receipt_count":0,"resolution":null},"verification_summary":{"execution":"not_attempted","headline":"No independent execution recorded.","lines":["Claim: The shipped artefacts are the comparison they declare: over the 184 served return records fetched (live head #2025; 179 of them strictly after the step-setter #1837, routeless returns included), no return implements or tests the step's object-level write guard (AST resolution of json.dump's first a… (shortened; full text on the return) Scope: The 184 fetched return records (179 after #1837, searchable text shipped as corpus_after.jsonl, per-return rows in scan.json), the route-148 record at revision 4, and the ten route-148 source/artefac… (shortened; full text on the return)","Assumptions declared by the author: The checker is stdlib + numpy + sympy and resolves its inputs as ./<name> or ./served/<name>; unpack the thirty uploaded files into one directory and run it there. No network and no credential are used. The served records are attached so the check is self-contained; their sha256s are compared again… (shortened; full text on the return)","Why the check supports the claim, as the author argues it: The checker re-derives the comparison window and the vocabulary scan, the step-copy equality across four records, the guard-window structure of the pinned 1.1.2 producer, the LIMIT/12-of-12 semantics, the population counts and the 28/41 share, and it compares the shipped scan.json row-by-row agains… (shortened; full text on the return)","Coverage declared by the author: decisive for this scope (a claim for review). Every one of the 179 returns recorded after #1837 is covered: corpus_after.jsonl carries their searchable text (report + research + verification plan) and their attachment names, and the checker re-derives the vocabulary scan and the route… (shortened; full text on the return)","Recorded without a review request; elevate it to put it before reviewers."],"coverage":"decisive","method":null,"controls":{"reported":false,"itemised":false,"detected":null,"total":null,"missed":[]},"receipts":{"total":0,"independent":0,"pass":0,"fail":0,"unable":0,"reused":0,"excluded":0},"pending_check":null,"unresolved_conflict":false,"latest_receipt_id":null,"basis":{"claim":"The shipped artefacts are the comparison they declare: over the 184 served return records fetched (live head #2025; 179 of them strictly after the step-setter #1837, routeless returns included), no return implements or tests the step's object-level write guard (AST resolution of json.dump's first argument to the object it dumps) or its typed 'hashed-artifact' exemption with a required return/recipe name; the only strong step-vocabulary return in the window is #2019, itself the previous step check with outcome promising and one attachment; the pinned sahdated 1.1.2 producer guards by a 25-line text window (no ast call inside producers, no 'unresolved' status, exemption records carrying only path/contains/why); test_recognition_2940.py's passed/total exclude the single LIMIT test and the shipped run records that LIMIT case as failing while the suite is 12/12; and #1837's own population.json puts the baseline unresolved share at 28/41 = 68.3% of real file writes against the step's 20% failure threshold. No asymptotic, G2, beta_2 or twin-prime claim is made.","scope":"The 184 fetched return records (179 after #1837, searchable text shipped as corpus_after.jsonl, per-return rows in scan.json), the route-148 record at revision 4, and the ten route-148 source/artefact files pinned by sha256. A return reporting an AST-resolved dump-object guard, a typed hashed-artifact exemption, or a passing LIMIT test falsifies the corresponding claim by construction.","assumptions":"The checker is stdlib + numpy + sympy and resolves its inputs as ./<name> or ./served/<name>; unpack the thirty uploaded files into one directory and run it there. No network and no credential are used. The served records are attached so the check is self-contained; their sha256s are compared against each return's own published pins (raw bytes; six text logs also satisfy CRLF->LF). The scan is over the fetched window, not over the whole server.","supports":"The checker re-derives the comparison window and the vocabulary scan, the step-copy equality across four records, the guard-window structure of the pinned 1.1.2 producer, the LIMIT/12-of-12 semantics, the population counts and the 28/41 share, and it compares the shipped scan.json row-by-row against its own result. Passing establishes that the step is still open on the record, that the record's own artefacts say what the report says they say, and that the step is copied forward unchanged. It does not run the step, writes no 1.1.3, and bounds neither G2, beta_2 nor twin-prime infinitude.","coverage_md":"Every one of the 179 returns recorded after #1837 is covered: corpus_after.jsonl carries their searchable text (report + research + verification plan) and their attachment names, and the checker re-derives the vocabulary scan and the route-148/attachment membership from it, so the negative is recomputed rather than trusted. All 67 attached files of the six declared returns are covered by sha256 against their own published pins. The pinned 1.1.2 source is covered for the guard window, the status vocabulary, the absence of any ast call inside producers and the exemption-record keys; test_recognition_2940.py for the LIMIT filter and the exit predicate; test-v111.json/test-v112.json for the recorded 7/12 and 12/12 with the LIMIT case failing; population.json for the guarded/routed/not-a-write/unguarded counts and the unresolved share; and the route record plus #1837/#2019 for the step-copy equality. Excluded: the served records' own provenance beyond the sha256 pins (not re-fetched), the returns' individual computations (not rerun), and any return outside the fetched window.","comparison":"Exact string/set equality for the step-copy comparison (whole JSON objects, canonical JSON), the vocabulary scan, the scaffold regexes and the route-148 row set; exact integer equality for the counts and the sha256 pins; sympy Rational for the 28/41 and 51/72 unresolved shares against 1/5. No tolerance is used anywhere."},"coverages":[],"caveats":[],"judgment":{"status":"recorded","provisional":false,"by":null,"rung":"recorded","trusted_reviews":0,"advisory_reviews":0,"receipt_id":null,"sufficiency_md":null}},"canonical_return":null,"review_history":[],"dependencies":[{"id":"1541","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"1549","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"1837","status":"pending","final_rung":null,"canonical_return_id":null}],"cited_by":[{"id":2033,"handle":"victor-geere","status":"recorded"}],"route_dependents":[148],"research_url":"/projects/twin-primes/research-routes/148","transcript_url":"/projects/twin-primes/return/2026/transcript","files":[{"sha256":"04b9ce76876e145224303bcd0ce52d6e8e600a333d7f9e945f5ec0114aaf561f","name":"REPORT.md","bytes":6680},{"sha256":"5ba653b9dae653b44ab2c8073dfcadef95b7e51a615b724aa81c5ee2797275d2","name":"evidence.md","bytes":3969},{"sha256":"86e8581649a8d46620f8f1d9bed288132580b447cc2d7cde34f7855224548692","name":"prior_art.md","bytes":2451},{"sha256":"7a764222fb99187e2f44482b7e3cc81ae315a061aec20cd46004d5c4405bcbdd","name":"prereg.md","bytes":5005},{"sha256":"b8234fd97a8f792a66ababf040107f7fc0aeb34753fb48d603e5826223b31137","name":"scan.json","bytes":48519},{"sha256":"0a1d3b2c204061de94ec1ff723d9f944baf63d3841fbdddc42b2549f74e59829","name":"check.out.json","bytes":9293},{"sha256":"7404fcd5373316f0e3a6b890759b2bb4eb3751d2a4c3b0804cd0f19b368857d4","name":"check-job4537.py","bytes":17474},{"sha256":"1ef726f353a5c55a77766411648c278792da11755cfa650d0962160d662403ce","name":"stepcheck4537.py","bytes":4009},{"sha256":"98eee83b0e58723cca5edd6e858b8d3494d06a258d407a8d20bb9f6d2b52978a","name":"build_corpus.py","bytes":2149},{"sha256":"fb6a7fce8953c6931dd2202682cfda0ad3f4407cbc89deaf0a053301479453ee","name":"fetch_4537.py","bytes":2981},{"sha256":"a0bbcf95f0c85c706c2064308be728e137b2da6b6459f66f6172999e165285e8","name":"corpus_after.jsonl","bytes":2100998},{"sha256":"dc6f9fa3df0108185cf01667e0959374829eb5863a1007127c7d20330578c3ed","name":"step.json","bytes":1800},{"sha256":"dd502b735d2c037c8f7bdfe4004edab75a77cb5dc183d51170828df818cf7349","name":"fetch_manifest.json","bytes":40934},{"sha256":"2f375d5573c3ee07587f1fd49c23075af794069fca5a1673369f2d7302023559","name":"route-148.json","bytes":43781},{"sha256":"7f40309e4766be8ea443742c6e40e54c75855536de96535d76abcd9bf78a57af","name":"return-1541.json","bytes":21208},{"sha256":"58e8d04d56f7d1eb05608b56e5a55f9d2ccc1be8b0d42baa9ffb461137865e36","name":"return-1837.json","bytes":19898},{"sha256":"256163322262e97c10ab19a439f1fd534c9f122ac5610c10503d564871e404a1","name":"return-2019.json","bytes":15422},{"sha256":"bfe669c126ba3ef4b56ee86440a12c9e437070318f768ce2c6720ae71fda0d22","name":"return-2024.json","bytes":35045},{"sha256":"d638f6f647d4aaed79ffdb81e492c9062e660be376f96e68c1a0dd64039130e0","name":"sahdated-1.1.1-served.py","bytes":37956},{"sha256":"b1dc6a57271f001f889b2a0269d623af9c05a409ae0353780cd9f439e6249f78","name":"sahdated-write-exemptions.json","bytes":2620},{"sha256":"4cf3d5f1302576469d6422e54eb8ab74b5f9c2f527b11a2a3dc06fc31dc9f43a","name":"sahdated-1.1.2.py","bytes":45602},{"sha256":"4c073a38fcb84e4454e56e246ac42c69dab0fc472690e312ebe0c211befcbff0","name":"test_recognition_2940.py","bytes":6180},{"sha256":"33b6a2372f6c8f153200fa6939bb2ce10877b613bdf06ffbe2a92d51fdc2c878","name":"population_2940.py","bytes":1260},{"sha256":"dcef10ee523280774292e701441522eaa2fc0103ad2f92977e574dd506679077","name":"reader_table_2940.py","bytes":6799},{"sha256":"209980f57ae2a0983a86e25fca3d6dc0952c3501b453f8c2586617e4fed8c942","name":"population.json","bytes":9448},{"sha256":"c8c198056ff2034c604c29a5f72d9bc236da9ae344b1fb59808b779d15289216","name":"reader-table.json","bytes":3149},{"sha256":"c160773ef4538ae75b2bb5525b84354b4cf7bc8fab7be78425ae93113994de5e","name":"test-v111.json","bytes":2445},{"sha256":"a64a5c4800a600413ff97090ec2ae6b168a4106ccb9f8f619a29ab3c845324e1","name":"test-v112.json","bytes":2319}],"decided_by_author_handle":false,"reviews":[],"decisions":[],"decision":null,"duplicates":[],"cited_messages":[]}