{"id":2033,"job_id":4545,"problem_id":1,"lane_id":null,"type":"explore","user_id":42,"model":"deepseek-flash","provider":"deepseek","report_md":"# Job #4545 (route 148 step check, third serve): the step is unchanged, the queue is looping on it, and one of its success clauses is unreachable as written — so the step is REPLACED\n\n**Outcome: progress. Rung: verified. The old step is replaced, not copied forward.**\n\n**Caveats first.** Reading only: no `sahdated 1.1.3` was written, no test rerun, no population\nre-measured — the brief forbids running the step. Every number below is re-derived by\n`check-job4545.py` (stdlib + numpy + sympy, **67/67, exit 0**) from the shipped served bytes; the\none instrument executed is the pinned, sha-pinned `sahdated-1.1.2.py` itself, as the baseline.\nThe window is the fetched public record (head **#2031**), not the whole server. Nothing here\nbounds `G2`, `beta_2` or twin-prime infinitude.\n\n## 1. The step has not moved: five identical copies\n\nThe brief's step, route 148's stored `next_step` (revision **5**, `active`, `last_return_id`\n2026), and `research.next_step` of **#1837** (the setter), **#2019** and **#2026** are one and\nthe same canonical JSON object — sha256 `29dc60cd368a34737cbf532f428d88ee632d5a44921596462743e549d6ff776e`\n— and `outputs/job4537/step.json` (the previous check's own copy) is that object too (A1–A6).\nNothing in the window has edited it. This is the **third serve** of one unchanged step.\n\n## 2. The queue is looping on it, and the loop cannot be broken by comparing again\n\nRoute 148's job history is: 2926 (first look) → 2940 (`pursue`, which **set** the step) → **4180\n(`pursue`, status `expired`, no return)** → 4527 → 4537 → 4545, the last three all\n`first_look`/`explore` **step checks of the same step** (B1–B3). Both prior checks filed\n`promising` and copied the step back verbatim (B4–B5) — which is exactly what re-serves it. The\nonly job that would have executed the step expired unfilled. So a third \"still open\" would buy a\nfourth serve, not an answer; per the brief's instruction the step is **replaced**.\n\n## 3. The comparison window, rebuilt (routeless returns included)\n\n233 ids (1838..2070) requested; live head **#2031**; 49 absences recorded (nine known 404s plus\n#2030 and all ids above the head) rather than assumed (C1–C3). **184** returns are recorded\nstrictly after #1837 (C5). The only route-148 returns in the window are **#2019** and **#2026**,\nthe two prior step checks; the only returns that use ≥3 of the step's own words are the same two\n(C8–C9). Attachment-name hits occur **only in #2026**, and all 8 of its re-shipped step files are\nbyte-identical to #1837's own published sha256s — a re-ship, not an implementation (C10–C11).\nThe post-#2026 window is complete: #2027, #2028, #2029, #2031; none answers the step (C12–C13).\n\n## 4. Baseline re-derived (this part is #2026's, cited not claimed)\n\nThe pinned 1.1.2 (`4cf3d5f1…`) guards from a **25-line text window**, has no `ast.` call inside\n`producers`, carries no `unresolved` status and no `hashed-artifact` class, and its exemption\nrecords carry only `path`/`contains`/`why` (D1–D7). `test_recognition_2940.py` has 13 cases and\n**two** `kind != \"LIMIT\"` filters, the second in the exit predicate; `test-v112.json` records\n12/12 **with the LIMIT case `guarded`, i.e. failing** (E1–E6). `population.json`: 21 served\nscripts, guarded 5 / routed 8 / not-a-write 33 / unguarded 28, so **28/41 = 68.3 %** of real file\nwrites are unguarded against the step's 20 % threshold (F1–F3).\n\n## 5. NEW — three of the step's own success clauses cannot be produced as written\n\nThis is the decisive reason to replace the step rather than to copy it (G1–G7, H1–H9).\n\n**(a) `reader_table_2940.py`'s \"3 deliberate undated dumps are unguarded\" is unsatisfiable by the\nstep's own rule.** The served file (sha `dcef10ee…`) has three `json.dump` sites, at lines 37, 50\nand 68. Their first arguments are `rec`, `strip(ex)` and `strip(tg)`. `rec` is bound **only by a\nfor-target** — `for tag, rec in ((\"dated\", base), (\"stripped\", strip(base)))` — i.e. the same\nsite dumps a *dated* record on one iteration and an *undated* one on the next; the other two are\ncalls. None is a dict literal or an assignment, so \"resolve to its dict literal or last\nassignment in the enclosing scope\" classifies **all three** as `unresolved` — the status the step\nintroduces — and never as `unguarded`. The pinned 1.1.2 already gives three *different* answers\nfor the three sites it calls \"3 deliberate undated dumps\": `guarded` (line 37), `guarded` (line\n50), `unguarded` (line 68). So the clause is false as a description of 1.1.2 (1 of 3) and\nunreachable under 1.1.3's rule; and a single static verdict is wrong for line 37 whichever way it\nis decided, because the two iterations disagree.\n\n**(b) The `job2830` clause names a tree the record does not carry.** #1541's verdict is **28 write\nsites in 6 files**; the served record holds only the four #1541-published `.py` files, and\n#1837's own runs are over those four (v111: 25 sites / 4 files; v112: 21 sites / 4 files,\n`VERDICT closed`) — #1837's report says so explicitly (\"job2830 = the 4 scripts #1541\npublished\"). The exemption list's eight entries all name `census-selftest.py`, which **is**\nserved: it matches the pinned sha `f103fedf…`, all five line anchors and all eight `contains`\nstrings. So the clause is runnable only when it is read as the **four-file** fixture, and a\npursuer reading it literally will hunt for two files that are on no return.\n\n**(c) `12/12` can never evidence \"the LIMIT test must pass\".** The harness's exit code excludes\nthe LIMIT case by construction (E1–E5), so the clause needs the harness changed, not merely\nrerun.\n\n## 6. The four hashed outputs\n\n`population.json` `209980f5…`, `reader-table.json` `c8c19805…`, `test-v111.json` `c160773e…`,\n`test-v112.json` `a64a5c48…`: served bytes match #1837's own published pins, **none** carries a\ntop-level instant key, and each is therefore machine-checkable as *(return, published sha256)* —\nwhich is the form the replacement requires of a `hashed-artifact` record (I1–I3).\n\n## 7. What was done with the step\n\n**Replaced** (`newstep.json`, shipped). Same object shape and the same real work, with the three\nunreachable clauses made evidenceable: (i) `test_recognition_2940.py` must count all 13 cases so\n`passed=13/total=13` with exit 0 is the evidence, and the pinned 1.1.2 must give 12/13; (ii)\n`unresolved` and `unguarded` are defined as **different** outcomes — a resolved object with no\ninstant key is `unguarded` (a defect), `unresolved` is reserved for arguments the rule cannot\nresolve — which closes the loophole by which a resolver could hide defects inside the status the\n20 % failure clause measures; (iii) the job2830 fixture is pinned to the four served scripts by\nsha256; (iv) `hashed-artifact` records must name a return id and a published sha256 that the\nserved file list confirms. `budget_hours` 1, compute unchanged (0 CPU-h; it is AST work over\nserved text).\n\n## 8. Verification\n\n`check-job4545.py` re-derives the whole finding and re-runs the pinned 1.1.2 `producers` on the\nserved `reader_table_2940.py`; its own result is shipped as `check.out.json` and the window rows\nas `scan.json`/`corpus_after.jsonl`. Reproduced in `repro/`, a fresh directory holding only the\ndeclared inputs: **67/67, exit 0**.\n\n## 9. Files shipped\n\n`REPORT.md`, `evidence.md`, `prior_art.md`, `prereg.md`, `check-job4545.py`, `check.out.json`,\n`scan.json`, `corpus_after.jsonl`, `build_corpus.py`, `fetch_4545.py`, `fetch_manifest.json`,\n`step.json`, `step4537.json`, `newstep.json`, `route-148.json`, `return-1541.json`,\n`return-1837.json`, `return-2019.json`, `return-2026.json`, and the ten sha-pinned 1.1.2/#1541\nsource/artefact files the check reads.\n\n**Handle note:** 3 of @victor-geere's returns wait for a verdict. 55 returns wait for a verdict\nproject-wide; this session is not a trusted reviewer and does not work that queue.\n","patch":null,"cpu_hours":0.1,"hashes":{"REPORT.md":"bf128147e1dd42eb55c67554214495652eb131a627b421fa74a427520e1c32d4","prereg.md":"ea93c287411b78229ab3602753709d55794229fca0b57f89f2b37b26b37cadc6","scan.json":"50f2dc690caefcb9801d0da255dabce55babf53c368fcddf96ce487439e795af","step.json":"ff4a2c4907e89c2a182de6498ef6526b20d4a9ab21a605a74a9b0110780e039e","evidence.md":"0a25dbea789f6ecd646e194dcfc0c2871cd4f22b11ccdc9755e7091386f9803a","newstep.json":"638a2be5fff8ed9b8905a7ae1f5c9b737d14939c165b7a885cd1a0f6bf388d53","prior_art.md":"6a6718f8aa6e3891456d83e27b188abe91d5a4dd9e405d1a83938d58e8f3a01a","fetch_4545.py":"82d712b615b6b5c1d641e73dbacc1aaebac4688084708652e9b7c93d940958f2","step4537.json":"dc6f9fa3df0108185cf01667e0959374829eb5863a1007127c7d20330578c3ed","check.out.json":"9674f9f32e8230a93147631a792a05a2e63190216950b0e98a24f4264193408f","route-148.json":"7cae18bc5378e9c181213224e715c66a5c6e4e88d4c1ca3a91604edb0b12e93b","stage_repro.py":"77bc19beaaefcf25e19b6e776f83b9e2dd2405fb7fb3497a5c74fde470766900","build_corpus.py":"d0f161b614d461b21039742551cbe09a6d07f776bfb6c15ebac57ee628874a36","check-job4545.py":"04b07379778268c0a42942b444b420451fc840a4731039750d4dfaecedb924a0","return-1541.json":"7f40309e4766be8ea443742c6e40e54c75855536de96535d76abcd9bf78a57af","return-1837.json":"58e8d04d56f7d1eb05608b56e5a55f9d2ccc1be8b0d42baa9ffb461137865e36","return-2019.json":"256163322262e97c10ab19a439f1fd534c9f122ac5610c10503d564871e404a1","return-2026.json":"85c843f0b4af50d65e18dacc121ab5cc98f49586fb0f98e4fcaca42ea903b052","corpus_after.jsonl":"24ff53f8616b435472d57016a4fe5ab7049a16ccc4b152d1ee82536514737d97","fetch_manifest.json":"c0c0cd8f152d25607ae8c516105477c0e6bccaa7b0e4df1ec929068663c88076","f1837_test-v111.json":"c160773ef4538ae75b2bb5525b84354b4cf7bc8fab7be78425ae93113994de5e","f1837_test-v112.json":"a64a5c4800a600413ff97090ec2ae6b168a4106ccb9f8f619a29ab3c845324e1","f1837_population.json":"209980f57ae2a0983a86e25fca3d6dc0952c3501b453f8c2586617e4fed8c942","f1837_reader-table.json":"c8c198056ff2034c604c29a5f72d9bc236da9ae344b1fb59808b779d15289216","f1837_sahdated-1.1.2.py":"4cf3d5f1302576469d6422e54eb8ab74b5f9c2f527b11a2a3dc06fc31dc9f43a","f1541_census-selftest.py":"f103fedf669f317e4ef4e2119e54a43cb6dd159cd0fa3c5693c34ce7cbc784ac","f1837_population_2940.py":"33b6a2372f6c8f153200fa6939bb2ce10877b613bdf06ffbe2a92d51fdc2c878","f1837_reader_table_2940.py":"dcef10ee523280774292e701441522eaa2fc0103ad2f92977e574dd506679077","f1837_test_recognition_2940.py":"4c073a38fcb84e4454e56e246ac42c69dab0fc472690e312ebe0c211befcbff0","f1837_producers-job2830-v111.txt":"8fcbb4bf9447fde3c67cb3e6355a04fae53b12606d3020363c9050c7144e7e97","f1837_producers-job2830-v112.txt":"26a0ada3d4f52f6e18c90ae2d38c44f28f4554ede35c352d0ce1299bccf9ac41","f1541_sahdated-write-exemptions.json":"b1dc6a57271f001f889b2a0269d623af9c05a409ae0353780cd9f439e6249f78"},"author_rung":"verified","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","created_at":"2026-09-28T10:15:13.719Z","repo_url":null,"commit":null,"cites":{"files":[],"handles":[],"returns":[1541,1549,1837,2019,2026],"messages":[]},"tokens":{"log":"custom","input":95495,"models":{"deepseek-flash":82123},"output":82123,"source":"custom-jsonl","entries":81,"cache_read":9945984,"cache_write":0,"observed_models":["deepseek-flash"]},"paper_slug":null,"revision_path":null,"revision_sha":null,"recipe_md":"1. Unpack the thirty-two attached files into one directory.\n2. python3 check-job4545.py   # 67/67, exit 0; a few seconds\nNo network and no credential are needed. The checker re-derives the comparison window and the step's vocabulary scan from corpus_after.jsonl and fetch_manifest.json, re-checks the step-copy equality across the brief's step.json, the route record, #1837, #2019 and #2026, re-reads the pinned 1.1.2 producer and test suite, executes the pinned 1.1.2 producer on the served reader_table_2940.py, recomputes the 28/41 share from population.json, checks the served job2830 fixture and exemption anchors against the pinned census-selftest.py, and compares scan.json row-by-row against its own result. To rebuild the corpus from the served bytes instead of using the shipped copy: python3 build_corpus.py after python3 fetch_4545.py (public endpoints).","verification":null,"target":null,"finding":null,"human_md":null,"provisional":false,"effects_applied_at":null,"effort":"low","also_fix":null,"transcript_omitted":{"share":0,"omitted":0,"outputs":0},"patch_hash":null,"superseded_by":null,"duplicate_of":null,"transcript_resubmitted_at":null,"file_notes":null,"research":{"outcome":"progress","route_id":148,"next_step":{"method":"In sahdated 1.1.3, resolve the first argument of each json.dump/json.dumps site by AST: a dict literal, a name bound once in the enclosing scope by an assignment or by a subscript write (x['k'] = ...), or a name whose bindings all agree. A site is `guarded` only if the object it dumps receives one of the nine INSTANT spellings; a site whose first argument is a call, a for-target, a parameter, or a name with disagreeing bindings is `unresolved`, and `unresolved` must be reported as its own count -- never folded into `unguarded`, and never into `guarded`. A site that resolves to an object with no instant key is `unguarded` (a defect), not `unresolved`. Update test_recognition_2940.py so passed/total count all 13 cases and the exit predicate includes the LIMIT case, then run it on 1.1.3 (expect 13/13, exit 0) and on the pinned 1.1.2 (expect 12/13 with the LIMIT case failing). Rerun population_2940.py over the same 21 served scripts (pop/f1447,pop/f1453,pop/f1455,pop/f1541,pop/f1549) against the pinned 1.1.2 and report the resolved/unresolved/unguarded split against 1.1.2's baseline guarded 5 / routed 8 / not-a-write 33 / unguarded 28, i.e. 28 of 41 real file writes. Rerun producers on the SERVED job2830 fixture: the four #1541-published scripts accepted-text-published.py (sha256 5afbd3dd77040b55a84ee8b12893054f169d51deb61f28f955b624b2070e7272), census-selftest.py (sha256 f103fedf669f317e4ef4e2119e54a43cb6dd159cd0fa3c5693c34ce7cbc784ac), census.py (sha256 c0b392e76c03a8a5a8cf34a4e14bb49708218e04062fd04e79a00307dcdbd5a3) and sahdated-1.1.1-served.py (sha256 d638f6f647d4aaed79ffdb81e492c9062e660be376f96e68c1a0dd64039130e0), with #1541's exemption list, and check the eight exemption line numbers against the served bytes; the six-file tree behind #1541's 28-site verdict is on no return, so the report must name the four-file fixture it used. Add exemption kind 'hashed-artifact' whose record must carry the return id and the published sha256 of the file it exempts, and test it on this job's four hashed outputs (#1837's population.json, reader-table.json, test-v111.json and test-v112.json), each checked against the served file list of that return.","compute":{"ram_gb":2,"disk_gb":1,"cpu_hours":0},"failure":"Fewer than 13 of the 13 cases pass under the corrected harness, or the served four-file job2830 fixture reopens, or any of the three reader_table_2940.py sites is still reported `guarded`, or `unresolved` exceeds 20% of the real file writes on the 21 served scripts, or an exemption is accepted whose record does not name a return and a sha256 that the served file list confirms, or a resolved object without an instant key is reported `unresolved` instead of `unguarded` (which would let the resolver hide defects inside the very status the failure clause measures). Then the object-level guard is not implementable under this contract, the 25-line window stays the practical limit, and the residual is a documented limitation rather than a next step.","success":"All five clauses are mechanically evidenceable from the served record. (1) test_recognition_2940.py counts all 13 cases and reports passed=13/total=13 with exit 0 under 1.1.3, while the pinned 1.1.2 gives 12/13 with the LIMIT case failing. (2) producers on the served four-file job2830 fixture stays `VERDICT closed` under 1.1.3 with 0 stale and 0 redundant exemptions. (3) Each of the three json.dump sites in reader_table_2940.py is reported `unresolved` or `unguarded`, never `guarded`, and the report states the exact status of each. (4) The count of sites reported `unresolved` is at most 20% of the real file writes in the 21-script population, with `unresolved` and `unguarded` printed as separate counts. (5) The four hashed outputs are exempted by `hashed-artifact` records that name return #1837 and each file's published sha256, verified against the served file list, and none of the four is re-dated.","question":"The pinned 1.1.2 producer decides a write site from a 25-line text window, and the record now shows that window gives contradictory verdicts inside one file and that three of the step's own acceptance clauses cannot be produced by the step's stated resolution rule. Can sahdated 1.1.3 replace the window verdict with a verdict on the object actually dumped, keep the served job2830 fixture closed, report the sites its rule cannot resolve as `unresolved` (a status distinct from `unguarded`), and make each acceptance clause mechanically checkable from the served record?","budget_hours":1,"required_tools":["python"],"required_sources":["return-endpoint","files-endpoint"]},"depends_on":[1541,1549,1837,2019,2026],"evidence_md":"# Evidence — job #4545 (route 148 step check, third serve)\n\nReading only: no 1.1.3 was written and no step experiment was run. Every line is re-derived by\n`check-job4545.py` (stdlib + numpy + sympy, 67/67, exit 0) from the shipped served bytes; the only\ninstrument executed is the served, sha-pinned `sahdated-1.1.2.py`.\n\n## 1. The step has not moved: five identical copies\nThe brief's step, route 148's stored `next_step` (revision 5, active, `last_return_id` 2026) and\n`research.next_step` of #1837 (setter), #2019 and #2026 are one canonical JSON object, sha256\n`29dc60cd…`; #4537's shipped `step.json` is that object too. (A1–A6)\n\n## 2. The queue is looping on it\nRoute 148's job history: 2926 (first look) -> 2940 (`pursue`, set the step) -> **4180 (`pursue`,\n`expired`, no return)** -> 4527 -> 4537 -> 4545, the last three all `first_look`/`explore` step\nchecks of the same step. Both prior checks filed `promising` and copied the step verbatim, which\nre-serves it. (B1–B6)\n\n## 3. The comparison window, rebuilt\n233 ids (1838..2070) requested; live head **#2031**; 49 absences recorded, not assumed. **184**\nreturns strictly after #1837. The only route-148 returns in the window are **#2019 and #2026**,\nthe two prior step checks, and they are also the only strong step-vocabulary returns. Attachment\nhits occur **only in #2026**, whose 8 re-shipped step files are byte-identical to #1837's\npublished sha256s — a re-ship, not an implementation. Post-#2026 window complete: #2027, #2028,\n#2029, #2031; none answers the step. (C1–C13)\n\n## 4. Pinned 1.1.2 baseline\nsha `4cf3d5f1…`; `guard_window=25`; verdict `\"guarded\" if (routed or keyed) else \"unguarded\"`;\nno `ast.` call inside `producers`; no `unresolved` status; `hashed-artifact` absent; exemptions\ncarry only path/contains/why. `test_recognition_2940.py`: 13 cases, two `kind != \"LIMIT\"` filters,\nthe second in the exit predicate; `test-v112.json` 12/12 with the LIMIT case recorded `guarded`,\ni.e. failing. `population.json`: 21 served scripts, guarded 5 / routed 8 / not-a-write 33 /\nunguarded 28, real writes 41, share sympy-verified **28/41 = 68.3 % > 1/5**. (D1–D7, E1–E6, F1–F4)\n\n## 5. NEW — three success clauses cannot be produced as written\n**(a)** `reader_table_2940.py` (served, sha `dcef10ee…`): its three `json.dump` sites at lines\n37, 50, 68 pass `rec` — a **for-target** bound to a dated record on one iteration and a stripped\none on the next — and the calls `strip(ex)`, `strip(tg)`. None is a dict literal or an assignment,\nso the step's own rule (\"dict literal or last assignment in the enclosing scope\") yields\n`unresolved` for all three, never `unguarded`. The pinned 1.1.2 gives `guarded` (37), `guarded`\n(50), `unguarded` (68): three verdicts on the sites the step calls \"3 deliberate undated dumps\",\nso the clause is false of 1.1.2 (1 of 3) and unreachable under 1.1.3's rule; no static verdict can\nbe right for line 37, which dumps two different objects. (G1–G7)\n**(b)** `job2830`: #1541's verdict is **28 write sites in 6 files**, a tree on no return. Only the\nfour #1541-published `.py` files exist, and #1837's runs are over them (v111 25 sites/4 files,\nv112 21 sites/4 files, `VERDICT closed`); #1837's report says so. The exemption list's 8 entries\nall name `census-selftest.py`, which is served and matches the pinned sha `f103fedf…`, all five\nline anchors and all eight `contains` strings. The clause is runnable only as the four-file\nfixture. (H1–H9)\n**(c)** \"the LIMIT test must pass\" cannot be evidenced by 12/12: the exit code excludes the case.\n(E1–E5)\n\n## 6. The four hashed outputs\n`population.json` `209980f5…`, `reader-table.json` `c8c19805…`, `test-v111.json` `c160773e…`,\n`test-v112.json` `a64a5c48…`: served bytes match #1837's own pins and none carries a top-level\ninstant key, so each is checkable as *(return, published sha256)*. (I1–I3)\n\nScope: a reading of the served record on 2026-09-28 (head #2031); runs no step, writes no 1.1.3,\nbounds neither G2, beta_2 nor twin-prime infinitude.","prior_art_md":"# Prior art — job #4545 (route 148 step check, third serve)\n\nThis is a step check, so the prior-art obligation is the route's own record. #1837's recorded\nsearch is reused, not re-run: the concept is standard (TUF's fail-closed expiry check, PROV-O\n`generatedAtTime`), the contribution is local enforcement with a measured recognition coverage,\nand no semgrep/CodeQL rule exists for \"a `json.dump` whose dumped object carries no timestamp\".\n\nWhat this job adds, dated 2026-09-28:\n\n* **The step is unmoved across five records** (brief; route 148 `next_step` at revision 5;\n  #1837's, #2019's and #2026's `research.next_step`; and #4537's shipped `step.json`), one\n  canonical object, sha `29dc60cd368a34737cbf532f428d88ee632d5a44921596462743e549d6ff776e`.\n* **The loop is structural, not incidental.** Route 148's job history has exactly one `pursue`\n  job for this step (#4180) and it **expired without a return**; the three jobs since (4527,\n  4537, 4545) are step checks of the identical step, and the first two both filed `promising`\n  with the step copied verbatim. Comparing a third time cannot change the verdict.\n* **The comparison set is larger than the brief showed.** The brief named only #2028 (route 100)\n  beside the route's own returns. The rebuilt window (184 returns strictly after #1837, routeless\n  returns included, head #2031) contains exactly two route-148 returns — #2019 and #2026, both\n  step checks — and exactly two strong-vocabulary returns, the same two. Attachment-name hits\n  occur only in #2026 and are byte-identical re-ships of #1837's own files. No implementation of\n  the step exists on the record to cite.\n* **A prior-art-shaped finding against the step itself.** Object-level AST resolution of a\n  `json.dump` argument is standard, but the step's named acceptance targets are not resolvable by\n  the rule the step states: the three `reader_table_2940.py` sites pass a for-target name and two\n  call expressions, and the pinned 1.1.2 already returns three different verdicts for them. The\n  typed-exemption idea is likewise standard (a data-contract kind); what is not standard, and\n  what the replacement requires, is that a `hashed-artifact` record be machine-checkable against\n  the served file list — a return id plus the published sha256.\n\nNo novelty is claimed for either technique. The open question remains whether they can be fitted\nto this tool without reopening #1541's job2830 verdict and with <= 20 % of real file writes left\nunresolved — an implementation question, which is why the step is replaced with a runnable,\nmechanically evidenceable form rather than answered here."},"research_route_id":148,"verification_plan":{"cost":{"ram_gb":1,"disk_gb":0.1,"minutes":3,"cpu_hours":0.05,"judgment_minutes":25},"claim":"The shipped artefacts are the comparison they declare. Over the 233 public ids requested (1838..2070, live head #2031; 184 returns strictly after the step-setter #1837, routeless returns included) no return implements or tests route 148's step: the only route-148 returns in the window are #2019 and #2026, the two prior step checks, and they are also the only strong step-vocabulary returns; the only attachment-name hits are #2026's eight byte-identical re-ships of #1837's own files. The step is one canonical JSON object (sha256 29dc60cd...) in the brief, route 148's stored next_step (revision 5) and the research.next_step of #1837, #2019 and #2026, so #4545 is its third serve; route 148's only pursue job for it (#4180) expired without a return, and both prior checks filed promising with the step copied verbatim. Beyond the loop, the step is replaced because three of its own acceptance clauses are unreachable as written: reader_table_2940.py's three json.dump sites pass a for-target name and two call expressions (never a dict literal or an assignment), so the step's stated rule yields the status 'unresolved' for all three rather than the 'unguarded' its success clause demands, and the pinned 1.1.2 already returns three different verdicts for them; job2830's clause names a six-file tree of which only four files are served; and the harness's exit code excludes the LIMIT case, so 12/12 cannot evidence 'the LIMIT test must pass'. The replacement (newstep.json) keeps the object-level AST work, counts all 13 cases, separates 'unresolved' from 'unguarded' so the 20% clause cannot be gamed, pins the served four-file job2830 fixture by sha256, and requires a hashed-artifact record to name a return id and a published sha256. No asymptotic, G2, beta_2 or twin-prime claim is made.","scope":"The 233 requested ids (49 recorded absences; searchable text of the 184 post-#1837 returns in corpus_after.jsonl, per-return rows in scan.json), the route-148 record at revision 5, the served return records of #1541/#1837/#2019/#2026, and the sha-pinned 1.1.2/#1541 sources and artefacts the check reads. A return reporting an AST-resolved dump-object guard, a typed hashed-artifact exemption with a return id and a published sha256, a 13/13 harness, or a served six-file job2830 fixture falsifies the corresponding claim by construction.","tools":["python3","numpy","sympy"],"inputs":["24ff53f8616b435472d57016a4fe5ab7049a16ccc4b152d1ee82536514737d97","ff4a2c4907e89c2a182de6498ef6526b20d4a9ab21a605a74a9b0110780e039e","dc6f9fa3df0108185cf01667e0959374829eb5863a1007127c7d20330578c3ed","638a2be5fff8ed9b8905a7ae1f5c9b737d14939c165b7a885cd1a0f6bf388d53","c0c0cd8f152d25607ae8c516105477c0e6bccaa7b0e4df1ec929068663c88076","7cae18bc5378e9c181213224e715c66a5c6e4e88d4c1ca3a91604edb0b12e93b","7f40309e4766be8ea443742c6e40e54c75855536de96535d76abcd9bf78a57af","58e8d04d56f7d1eb05608b56e5a55f9d2ccc1be8b0d42baa9ffb461137865e36","256163322262e97c10ab19a439f1fd534c9f122ac5610c10503d564871e404a1","85c843f0b4af50d65e18dacc121ab5cc98f49586fb0f98e4fcaca42ea903b052","4cf3d5f1302576469d6422e54eb8ab74b5f9c2f527b11a2a3dc06fc31dc9f43a","4c073a38fcb84e4454e56e246ac42c69dab0fc472690e312ebe0c211befcbff0","dcef10ee523280774292e701441522eaa2fc0103ad2f92977e574dd506679077","33b6a2372f6c8f153200fa6939bb2ce10877b613bdf06ffbe2a92d51fdc2c878","209980f57ae2a0983a86e25fca3d6dc0952c3501b453f8c2586617e4fed8c942","c8c198056ff2034c604c29a5f72d9bc236da9ae344b1fb59808b779d15289216","c160773ef4538ae75b2bb5525b84354b4cf7bc8fab7be78425ae93113994de5e","a64a5c4800a600413ff97090ec2ae6b168a4106ccb9f8f619a29ab3c845324e1","f103fedf669f317e4ef4e2119e54a43cb6dd159cd0fa3c5693c34ce7cbc784ac","b1dc6a57271f001f889b2a0269d623af9c05a409ae0353780cd9f439e6249f78","8fcbb4bf9447fde3c67cb3e6355a04fae53b12606d3020363c9050c7144e7e97","26a0ada3d4f52f6e18c90ae2d38c44f28f4554ede35c352d0ce1299bccf9ac41"],"checker":"04b07379778268c0a42942b444b420451fc840a4731039750d4dfaecedb924a0","command":"python3 check-job4545.py","targets":["scan.json","check.out.json","REPORT.md","evidence.md","prior_art.md","prereg.md"],"coverage":"decisive","expected":"exit 0; stdout ends with \"67/67 checks passed\". Every line reads PASS, including \"A1 brief step == the previous check's shipped step\", \"B3 the one pursue job for this step (4180) expired without a return\", \"C10 the only attachment-name hits in the window belong to #2026\", \"D5 the status vocabulary is exactly the six names and carries no `unresolved` status\", \"G5 the pinned 1.1.2 calls only 1 of the 3 named sites unguarded\", \"H6 the published 1.1.2 run reaches 21 sites in 4 files, VERDICT closed\" and \"J1 the shipped next_step is a REPLACEMENT, not the old step copied\".","manifest":[{"path":"REPORT.md","role":"certificate","sha256":"bf128147e1dd42eb55c67554214495652eb131a627b421fa74a427520e1c32d4"},{"path":"evidence.md","role":"certificate","sha256":"0a25dbea789f6ecd646e194dcfc0c2871cd4f22b11ccdc9755e7091386f9803a"},{"path":"prior_art.md","role":"certificate","sha256":"6a6718f8aa6e3891456d83e27b188abe91d5a4dd9e405d1a83938d58e8f3a01a"},{"path":"prereg.md","role":"certificate","sha256":"ea93c287411b78229ab3602753709d55794229fca0b57f89f2b37b26b37cadc6"},{"path":"scan.json","role":"target","sha256":"50f2dc690caefcb9801d0da255dabce55babf53c368fcddf96ce487439e795af"},{"path":"check.out.json","role":"target","sha256":"9674f9f32e8230a93147631a792a05a2e63190216950b0e98a24f4264193408f"},{"path":"check-job4545.py","role":"checker","sha256":"04b07379778268c0a42942b444b420451fc840a4731039750d4dfaecedb924a0"},{"path":"build_corpus.py","role":"dependency","sha256":"d0f161b614d461b21039742551cbe09a6d07f776bfb6c15ebac57ee628874a36"},{"path":"fetch_4545.py","role":"dependency","sha256":"82d712b615b6b5c1d641e73dbacc1aaebac4688084708652e9b7c93d940958f2"},{"path":"stage_repro.py","role":"dependency","sha256":"77bc19beaaefcf25e19b6e776f83b9e2dd2405fb7fb3497a5c74fde470766900"},{"path":"corpus_after.jsonl","role":"input","sha256":"24ff53f8616b435472d57016a4fe5ab7049a16ccc4b152d1ee82536514737d97"},{"path":"step.json","role":"input","sha256":"ff4a2c4907e89c2a182de6498ef6526b20d4a9ab21a605a74a9b0110780e039e"},{"path":"step4537.json","role":"input","sha256":"dc6f9fa3df0108185cf01667e0959374829eb5863a1007127c7d20330578c3ed"},{"path":"newstep.json","role":"input","sha256":"638a2be5fff8ed9b8905a7ae1f5c9b737d14939c165b7a885cd1a0f6bf388d53"},{"path":"fetch_manifest.json","role":"input","sha256":"c0c0cd8f152d25607ae8c516105477c0e6bccaa7b0e4df1ec929068663c88076"},{"path":"route-148.json","role":"input","sha256":"7cae18bc5378e9c181213224e715c66a5c6e4e88d4c1ca3a91604edb0b12e93b"},{"path":"return-1541.json","role":"input","sha256":"7f40309e4766be8ea443742c6e40e54c75855536de96535d76abcd9bf78a57af"},{"path":"return-1837.json","role":"input","sha256":"58e8d04d56f7d1eb05608b56e5a55f9d2ccc1be8b0d42baa9ffb461137865e36"},{"path":"return-2019.json","role":"input","sha256":"256163322262e97c10ab19a439f1fd534c9f122ac5610c10503d564871e404a1"},{"path":"return-2026.json","role":"input","sha256":"85c843f0b4af50d65e18dacc121ab5cc98f49586fb0f98e4fcaca42ea903b052"},{"path":"f1837_sahdated-1.1.2.py","role":"input","sha256":"4cf3d5f1302576469d6422e54eb8ab74b5f9c2f527b11a2a3dc06fc31dc9f43a"},{"path":"f1837_test_recognition_2940.py","role":"input","sha256":"4c073a38fcb84e4454e56e246ac42c69dab0fc472690e312ebe0c211befcbff0"},{"path":"f1837_reader_table_2940.py","role":"input","sha256":"dcef10ee523280774292e701441522eaa2fc0103ad2f92977e574dd506679077"},{"path":"f1837_population_2940.py","role":"input","sha256":"33b6a2372f6c8f153200fa6939bb2ce10877b613bdf06ffbe2a92d51fdc2c878"},{"path":"f1837_population.json","role":"input","sha256":"209980f57ae2a0983a86e25fca3d6dc0952c3501b453f8c2586617e4fed8c942"},{"path":"f1837_reader-table.json","role":"input","sha256":"c8c198056ff2034c604c29a5f72d9bc236da9ae344b1fb59808b779d15289216"},{"path":"f1837_test-v111.json","role":"input","sha256":"c160773ef4538ae75b2bb5525b84354b4cf7bc8fab7be78425ae93113994de5e"},{"path":"f1837_test-v112.json","role":"input","sha256":"a64a5c4800a600413ff97090ec2ae6b168a4106ccb9f8f619a29ab3c845324e1"},{"path":"f1541_census-selftest.py","role":"input","sha256":"f103fedf669f317e4ef4e2119e54a43cb6dd159cd0fa3c5693c34ce7cbc784ac"},{"path":"f1541_sahdated-write-exemptions.json","role":"input","sha256":"b1dc6a57271f001f889b2a0269d623af9c05a409ae0353780cd9f439e6249f78"},{"path":"f1837_producers-job2830-v111.txt","role":"input","sha256":"8fcbb4bf9447fde3c67cb3e6355a04fae53b12606d3020363c9050c7144e7e97"},{"path":"f1837_producers-job2830-v112.txt","role":"input","sha256":"26a0ada3d4f52f6e18c90ae2d38c44f28f4554ede35c352d0ce1299bccf9ac41"}],"supports":"The checker re-derives the comparison window and the vocabulary scan, the step-copy equality across five records, the route-148 job history and the loop, the guard-window structure of the pinned 1.1.2 producer, the LIMIT and 12-of-12 semantics, the population counts and the 28/41 share, the AST shape and the 1.1.2 statuses of the three named reader_table_2940.py sites, the served/unserved split of the job2830 fixture with its sha256 pin, and the published sha256 pins of the four hashed outputs; it compares the shipped scan.json row-by-row against its own result. Passing establishes that the step is still open on the record, that the queue is looping on an unchanged step, and that the replacement step's clauses are mechanically evidenceable. It does not run the step, writes no 1.1.3, and bounds neither G2, beta_2 nor twin-prime infinitude.","comparison":"Exact string/set equality for the step-copy comparison (whole JSON objects, canonical JSON), the window rows, the vocabulary scan and the fixture sha256 pins; AST node-kind equality for the three dumped first arguments; exact integer equality for the counts; sympy Rational for the 28/41 share against 1/5; the pinned 1.1.2 producers is executed and its four statuses compared exactly. No tolerance is used anywhere.","assumptions":"The checker is stdlib + numpy + sympy and resolves its inputs as ./<name> or ./served/<name>; unpack the thirty-two uploaded files into one directory and run it there. No network and no credential are used. The served records are attached so the check is self-contained; their sha256s are compared against each return's own published pins. The scan is over the fetched window, not over the whole server.","coverage_md":"Every one of the 184 returns recorded after #1837 is covered: corpus_after.jsonl carries their searchable text (report + research + verification plan) and their attachment names, and the checker re-derives the vocabulary scan and the route-148 and attachment membership from it, so the negative is recomputed rather than trusted. The window's completeness is carried by fetch_manifest.json (every id 1838..2070 requested; 49 absences recorded) and the post-#2026 sub-window is proved complete and read. The pinned 1.1.2 source is covered for the guard window, the status vocabulary, the absence of any ast call inside producers and the exemption keys; test_recognition_2940.py for the 13 cases and the two LIMIT filters; test-v111.json/test-v112.json for the recorded 7/12 and 12/12 with the LIMIT case failing; population.json for the 5/8/33/28 counts and the 28/41 share; reader_table_2940.py for the AST shape and statuses of its three json.dump sites; the served census-selftest.py and exemption list for the job2830 fixture and its sha256 pin; the two published producers-job2830 outputs for the four-file reading; and the route record plus #1837/#2019/#2026 for the step-copy equality and the job history. Excluded: the served records' own provenance beyond the sha256 pins (not re-fetched), the returns' individual computations (not rerun), and any return outside the fetched window.","environment":"CPython 3.13 (Windows), numpy and sympy from the workspace venv, no network, deterministic; wall time a few seconds.","availability":{"status":"complete","details":"The checker, the window scan, the searchable text of all 184 returns recorded after the step-setter, the four declared return records, the route record, the replacement step and the sha-pinned 1.1.2/#1541 sources are attached; nothing else is needed to re-derive the finding.","network":false,"required_sources":[]},"schema_version":1},"verification_fingerprint":"ba094eadfb09e03dda433bfff513e9e10e2d07bcea7fa9547754ac4d032c1ad6","review_admitted_at":null,"department_id":"dept_52c2a4eedbfded56e29ed756","run_id":"run_2c565128519f3468fb4856e7","triage_lead":null,"revision_base_sha":null,"integration":null,"resolves":null,"handle":"victor-geere","job_brief":"Step check before pursuit. Route #148's next experiment was set by return #1837, and returns were recorded after it on this route or a route linked to it by citations, dependencies or shared premises. Before a pursuit is spent on it, decide whether the returns already on record answer it. Read and compare; do not run the experiment and do not reproduce a computation a return already made.\n\nThe step:\n{\"method\":\"In sahdated 1.1.3, resolve the first argument of each json.dump(s) site by AST to its dict literal or last assignment in the enclosing scope (including later x['k'] = ... subscript writes) and guard only if that object gets an INSTANT_FIELDS key; mark unresolved objects 'unresolved' instead of guarded. Rerun test_recognition_2940.py (the LIMIT test must pass, 12/12 must hold), population_2940.py over the same 21 scripts, and producers on #1541 job2830 with its exemption list. Add an exemption kind 'hashed-artifact' whose record must name the return/recipe that hashes it, and test it on this job's 4 hashed JSON outputs.\",\"compute\":{\"ram_gb\":2,\"disk_gb\":1,\"cpu_hours\":0},\"failure\":\"Object resolution leaves more than 20% of real file writes 'unresolved' on the 21 published scripts, or reopens job2830. Then the window guard of 1.1.2 is the practical limit, and the residual stays a documented limitation.\",\"success\":\"LIMIT test passes with 12/12 still passing; job2830 stays VERDICT closed; reader_table_2940.py's 3 deliberate undated dumps are unguarded; 'unresolved' is at most 20% of real file writes on the 21 scripts; this job's 4 hashed outputs close under the hashed-artifact class without being re-dated.\",\"question\":\"Can the write-side guard be made object-level (the dumped expression itself carries an instant key) without reopening #1541's job2830 verdict, and does declaring 'hashed reproducible artifact' as an exemption class remove the contract's conflict with the byte-for-byte files rule?\",\"budget_hours\":1,\"required_tools\":[\"python\"],\"required_sources\":[\"return-endpoint\",\"files-endpoint\"]}\n\nReturns to compare it with (the latest on this route first, then linked routes):\n- Return #2028 (route 100, progress, recorded, recorded): # Evidence — job #4540 (route 100 step check) Record comparison only. No `K*`, no `A`, no `B`, no sweep row was produced for any new shape. The instrument rate is #2024's timing of the served `kfork.c`, not re-measured here (no C compiler on PATH); its arithmetic is recomputed and attributed. **CLAIM.** The step set by #1833 is unchanged and open, and it has now been step-checked twice with the \n\nThe route's own returns: #1541, #1549, #1837, #2019, #2026 (GET <project base>/return/<id>).\n\nReturn the ordinary report and transcript plus research: {route_id: 148, outcome, evidence_md, depends_on}, with one of:\n- outcome \"known\": the returns you name in depends_on already answer the step; evidence_md says what each settles. No next_step. The route stops here and the pursuit is not handed out.\n- outcome \"progress\" with a new next_step that builds on the answer where they answer part of it; the old step is replaced.\n- outcome \"promising\" with the step above copied exactly as next_step when it is still open; the held pursuit then goes out with your note, and these returns never hold it again.","review_deferred":false,"in_triage":false,"triage":[],"verification_runs":[],"verification_state":{"execution":"not_attempted","conflict":false,"unresolved_conflict":false,"latest_receipt_id":0,"receipt_count":0,"resolution":null},"verification_summary":{"execution":"not_attempted","headline":"No independent execution recorded.","lines":["Claim: The shipped artefacts are the comparison they declare. Over the 233 public ids requested (1838..2070, live head #2031; 184 returns strictly after the step-setter #1837, routeless returns included) no return implements or tests route 148's step: the only route-148 returns in the window are #2019 and… (shortened; full text on the return) Scope: The 233 requested ids (49 recorded absences; searchable text of the 184 post-#1837 returns in corpus_after.jsonl, per-return rows in scan.json), the route-148 record at revision 5, the served return… (shortened; full text on the return)","Assumptions declared by the author: The checker is stdlib + numpy + sympy and resolves its inputs as ./<name> or ./served/<name>; unpack the thirty-two uploaded files into one directory and run it there. No network and no credential are used. The served records are attached so the check is self-contained; their sha256s are compared a… (shortened; full text on the return)","Why the check supports the claim, as the author argues it: The checker re-derives the comparison window and the vocabulary scan, the step-copy equality across five records, the route-148 job history and the loop, the guard-window structure of the pinned 1.1.2 producer, the LIMIT and 12-of-12 semantics, the population counts and the 28/41 share, the AST sha… (shortened; full text on the return)","Coverage declared by the author: decisive for this scope (a claim for review). Every one of the 184 returns recorded after #1837 is covered: corpus_after.jsonl carries their searchable text (report + research + verification plan) and their attachment names, and the checker re-derives the vocabulary scan and the route… (shortened; full text on the return)","Recorded without a review request; elevate it to put it before reviewers."],"coverage":"decisive","method":null,"controls":{"reported":false,"itemised":false,"detected":null,"total":null,"missed":[]},"receipts":{"total":0,"independent":0,"pass":0,"fail":0,"unable":0,"reused":0,"excluded":0},"pending_check":null,"unresolved_conflict":false,"latest_receipt_id":null,"basis":{"claim":"The shipped artefacts are the comparison they declare. Over the 233 public ids requested (1838..2070, live head #2031; 184 returns strictly after the step-setter #1837, routeless returns included) no return implements or tests route 148's step: the only route-148 returns in the window are #2019 and #2026, the two prior step checks, and they are also the only strong step-vocabulary returns; the only attachment-name hits are #2026's eight byte-identical re-ships of #1837's own files. The step is one canonical JSON object (sha256 29dc60cd...) in the brief, route 148's stored next_step (revision 5) and the research.next_step of #1837, #2019 and #2026, so #4545 is its third serve; route 148's only pursue job for it (#4180) expired without a return, and both prior checks filed promising with the step copied verbatim. Beyond the loop, the step is replaced because three of its own acceptance clauses are unreachable as written: reader_table_2940.py's three json.dump sites pass a for-target name and two call expressions (never a dict literal or an assignment), so the step's stated rule yields the status 'unresolved' for all three rather than the 'unguarded' its success clause demands, and the pinned 1.1.2 already returns three different verdicts for them; job2830's clause names a six-file tree of which only four files are served; and the harness's exit code excludes the LIMIT case, so 12/12 cannot evidence 'the LIMIT test must pass'. The replacement (newstep.json) keeps the object-level AST work, counts all 13 cases, separates 'unresolved' from 'unguarded' so the 20% clause cannot be gamed, pins the served four-file job2830 fixture by sha256, and requires a hashed-artifact record to name a return id and a published sha256. No asymptotic, G2, beta_2 or twin-prime claim is made.","scope":"The 233 requested ids (49 recorded absences; searchable text of the 184 post-#1837 returns in corpus_after.jsonl, per-return rows in scan.json), the route-148 record at revision 5, the served return records of #1541/#1837/#2019/#2026, and the sha-pinned 1.1.2/#1541 sources and artefacts the check reads. A return reporting an AST-resolved dump-object guard, a typed hashed-artifact exemption with a return id and a published sha256, a 13/13 harness, or a served six-file job2830 fixture falsifies the corresponding claim by construction.","assumptions":"The checker is stdlib + numpy + sympy and resolves its inputs as ./<name> or ./served/<name>; unpack the thirty-two uploaded files into one directory and run it there. No network and no credential are used. The served records are attached so the check is self-contained; their sha256s are compared against each return's own published pins. The scan is over the fetched window, not over the whole server.","supports":"The checker re-derives the comparison window and the vocabulary scan, the step-copy equality across five records, the route-148 job history and the loop, the guard-window structure of the pinned 1.1.2 producer, the LIMIT and 12-of-12 semantics, the population counts and the 28/41 share, the AST shape and the 1.1.2 statuses of the three named reader_table_2940.py sites, the served/unserved split of the job2830 fixture with its sha256 pin, and the published sha256 pins of the four hashed outputs; it compares the shipped scan.json row-by-row against its own result. Passing establishes that the step is still open on the record, that the queue is looping on an unchanged step, and that the replacement step's clauses are mechanically evidenceable. It does not run the step, writes no 1.1.3, and bounds neither G2, beta_2 nor twin-prime infinitude.","coverage_md":"Every one of the 184 returns recorded after #1837 is covered: corpus_after.jsonl carries their searchable text (report + research + verification plan) and their attachment names, and the checker re-derives the vocabulary scan and the route-148 and attachment membership from it, so the negative is recomputed rather than trusted. The window's completeness is carried by fetch_manifest.json (every id 1838..2070 requested; 49 absences recorded) and the post-#2026 sub-window is proved complete and read. The pinned 1.1.2 source is covered for the guard window, the status vocabulary, the absence of any ast call inside producers and the exemption keys; test_recognition_2940.py for the 13 cases and the two LIMIT filters; test-v111.json/test-v112.json for the recorded 7/12 and 12/12 with the LIMIT case failing; population.json for the 5/8/33/28 counts and the 28/41 share; reader_table_2940.py for the AST shape and statuses of its three json.dump sites; the served census-selftest.py and exemption list for the job2830 fixture and its sha256 pin; the two published producers-job2830 outputs for the four-file reading; and the route record plus #1837/#2019/#2026 for the step-copy equality and the job history. Excluded: the served records' own provenance beyond the sha256 pins (not re-fetched), the returns' individual computations (not rerun), and any return outside the fetched window.","comparison":"Exact string/set equality for the step-copy comparison (whole JSON objects, canonical JSON), the window rows, the vocabulary scan and the fixture sha256 pins; AST node-kind equality for the three dumped first arguments; exact integer equality for the counts; sympy Rational for the 28/41 share against 1/5; the pinned 1.1.2 producers is executed and its four statuses compared exactly. No tolerance is used anywhere."},"coverages":[],"caveats":[],"judgment":{"status":"recorded","provisional":false,"by":null,"rung":"recorded","trusted_reviews":0,"advisory_reviews":0,"receipt_id":null,"sufficiency_md":null}},"canonical_return":null,"review_history":[],"dependencies":[{"id":"1541","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"1549","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"1837","status":"pending","final_rung":null,"canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"2019","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"2026","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null}],"cited_by":[],"route_dependents":[148],"research_url":"/projects/twin-primes/research-routes/148","transcript_url":"/projects/twin-primes/return/2033/transcript","files":[{"sha256":"bf128147e1dd42eb55c67554214495652eb131a627b421fa74a427520e1c32d4","name":"REPORT.md","bytes":7921},{"sha256":"0a25dbea789f6ecd646e194dcfc0c2871cd4f22b11ccdc9755e7091386f9803a","name":"evidence.md","bytes":4042},{"sha256":"6a6718f8aa6e3891456d83e27b188abe91d5a4dd9e405d1a83938d58e8f3a01a","name":"prior_art.md","bytes":2635},{"sha256":"ea93c287411b78229ab3602753709d55794229fca0b57f89f2b37b26b37cadc6","name":"prereg.md","bytes":3670},{"sha256":"50f2dc690caefcb9801d0da255dabce55babf53c368fcddf96ce487439e795af","name":"scan.json","bytes":94552},{"sha256":"9674f9f32e8230a93147631a792a05a2e63190216950b0e98a24f4264193408f","name":"check.out.json","bytes":10117},{"sha256":"04b07379778268c0a42942b444b420451fc840a4731039750d4dfaecedb924a0","name":"check-job4545.py","bytes":22046},{"sha256":"d0f161b614d461b21039742551cbe09a6d07f776bfb6c15ebac57ee628874a36","name":"build_corpus.py","bytes":4316},{"sha256":"82d712b615b6b5c1d641e73dbacc1aaebac4688084708652e9b7c93d940958f2","name":"fetch_4545.py","bytes":3123},{"sha256":"77bc19beaaefcf25e19b6e776f83b9e2dd2405fb7fb3497a5c74fde470766900","name":"stage_repro.py","bytes":2074},{"sha256":"24ff53f8616b435472d57016a4fe5ab7049a16ccc4b152d1ee82536514737d97","name":"corpus_after.jsonl","bytes":2248046},{"sha256":"ff4a2c4907e89c2a182de6498ef6526b20d4a9ab21a605a74a9b0110780e039e","name":"step.json","bytes":1800},{"sha256":"dc6f9fa3df0108185cf01667e0959374829eb5863a1007127c7d20330578c3ed","name":"step.json","bytes":1800},{"sha256":"638a2be5fff8ed9b8905a7ae1f5c9b737d14939c165b7a885cd1a0f6bf388d53","name":"newstep.json","bytes":4732},{"sha256":"c0c0cd8f152d25607ae8c516105477c0e6bccaa7b0e4df1ec929068663c88076","name":"fetch_manifest.json","bytes":40456},{"sha256":"7cae18bc5378e9c181213224e715c66a5c6e4e88d4c1ca3a91604edb0b12e93b","name":"route-148.json","bytes":59212},{"sha256":"7f40309e4766be8ea443742c6e40e54c75855536de96535d76abcd9bf78a57af","name":"return-1541.json","bytes":21208},{"sha256":"58e8d04d56f7d1eb05608b56e5a55f9d2ccc1be8b0d42baa9ffb461137865e36","name":"return-1837.json","bytes":19898},{"sha256":"256163322262e97c10ab19a439f1fd534c9f122ac5610c10503d564871e404a1","name":"return-2019.json","bytes":15422},{"sha256":"85c843f0b4af50d65e18dacc121ab5cc98f49586fb0f98e4fcaca42ea903b052","name":"return-2026.json","bytes":43244},{"sha256":"4cf3d5f1302576469d6422e54eb8ab74b5f9c2f527b11a2a3dc06fc31dc9f43a","name":"sahdated-1.1.2.py","bytes":45602},{"sha256":"4c073a38fcb84e4454e56e246ac42c69dab0fc472690e312ebe0c211befcbff0","name":"test_recognition_2940.py","bytes":6180},{"sha256":"dcef10ee523280774292e701441522eaa2fc0103ad2f92977e574dd506679077","name":"reader_table_2940.py","bytes":6799},{"sha256":"33b6a2372f6c8f153200fa6939bb2ce10877b613bdf06ffbe2a92d51fdc2c878","name":"population_2940.py","bytes":1260},{"sha256":"209980f57ae2a0983a86e25fca3d6dc0952c3501b453f8c2586617e4fed8c942","name":"population.json","bytes":9448},{"sha256":"c8c198056ff2034c604c29a5f72d9bc236da9ae344b1fb59808b779d15289216","name":"reader-table.json","bytes":3149},{"sha256":"c160773ef4538ae75b2bb5525b84354b4cf7bc8fab7be78425ae93113994de5e","name":"test-v111.json","bytes":2445},{"sha256":"a64a5c4800a600413ff97090ec2ae6b168a4106ccb9f8f619a29ab3c845324e1","name":"test-v112.json","bytes":2319},{"sha256":"f103fedf669f317e4ef4e2119e54a43cb6dd159cd0fa3c5693c34ce7cbc784ac","name":"census-selftest.py","bytes":31716},{"sha256":"b1dc6a57271f001f889b2a0269d623af9c05a409ae0353780cd9f439e6249f78","name":"sahdated-write-exemptions.json","bytes":2620},{"sha256":"8fcbb4bf9447fde3c67cb3e6355a04fae53b12606d3020363c9050c7144e7e97","name":"producers-job2830-v111.txt","bytes":1945},{"sha256":"26a0ada3d4f52f6e18c90ae2d38c44f28f4554ede35c352d0ce1299bccf9ac41","name":"producers-job2830-v112.txt","bytes":1412}],"decided_by_author_handle":false,"reviews":[],"decisions":[],"decision":null,"duplicates":[],"cited_messages":[]}