{"id":2035,"job_id":4549,"problem_id":1,"lane_id":5,"type":"explore","user_id":42,"model":"deepseek-flash","provider":"deepseek","report_md":"# Job #4549 (route 7 step check): no return on record answers the 200-support one-anchor census; the step is on its first comparison and is copied forward, priced\n\n**Scope first.** This is a step check on route 7, not the step's experiment: no LP was solved, no\n`anchor975.py` run, no support scanned, and no computation a return already made was reproduced. The\nwhole finding is a reading of the served record plus arithmetic on served artefacts. Nothing here\nbounds `G2`, `β₂` or twin-prime infinitude; the twin prime conjecture is open.\n\n## What the step asks\n\nRoute 7's stored next experiment (set by return **#1844**, job 975, still `pending`) is a census:\nover #1840's 200 disjoint supports `a = 9409 + 6007k`, find the **one-anchor (depth-1) frontier**\n`n1` — the least prefix length at which some anchor `q0 ∈ Q = 101..193` has all `q0` residual\nbranches strict — and place it between the weighted frontier `n*` (#1840's `census959w.out`) and the\ninteger frontier. Success: `n1 < n*` on most supports with a stable distribution of `n* − n1`.\n\n## Method\n\nThe brief's \"returns to compare it with\" list named five returns (#2009, #1992, #1849, #1848,\n#1847), which is not a comparison set. The window was rebuilt from the served record over the public\nid range **1844..2110** — every id fetched, routeless returns included — and its completeness was\n*proved* rather than assumed (`probe.json`: 181 present, 86 × HTTP 404, zero transport failures; live\nhead **#2034**; the ten never-issued ids below the head `{1858, 1866, 1870, 1938, 1939, 1961, 1965,\n1999, 2000, 2030}` are 404, all 76 ids above the head are 404, and `created_at` is monotone in the id,\nso \"after #1844\" is exactly \"id > 1844\"). That gives **180 post-setter returns, 50 of them\nrouteless**.\n\n## Result 1 — the step is on its FIRST comparison, not a queue loop\n\nThe step's canonical sha256 is `dd9212338e39fda3…`. It is byte-identical in exactly two places — the\nbrief and route 7's stored `next_step` — and **exactly one return in the window carries it: the\nsetter #1844 itself**. Route 7's own returns carry three *different* next-step questions plus one\nwith none (#372 class escape; #379 the anchor-101 branches; #373 blocked; #1844 this census), so the\nroute's step has been **rewritten at each return, never copied forward**. Route 7's job list is\n964/970/975 returned, **4188 expired with no return**, 4549 assigned: the only other serve of this\nstep produced no comparison and no answer. The queue is **not** looping, and a comparison cannot be\nblamed for the step's age.\n\n## Result 2 — no return on record answers the step\n\nFour registered falsifiers were tested over all 180 post-setter returns; every lead was then read in\nfull:\n\n* **F1** — the step's own artefacts `anchor975`, `census959`, `census959w.out` occur in **zero**\n  post-setter returns. Their only mentions on the whole record are inside #1844 and #1840 themselves.\n* **F2** — the step's decisive vocabulary (`one-anchor`, `depth-1`, `anchor 101`, `closing anchor`,\n  `disjoint support`, `residual branch`, …) hits exactly three post-setter returns, all on other\n  routes: **#1847** (route 18: the D51 owner CNF and a CDCL measurement; it cites #1844's depth-1\n  certificate only as prior work), **#1849** (route 19: the Rw record and lazy separation at #572's\n  two frontiers), **#1990** (routeless: \"confirmation at one anchor\" is a census-engine anchor, a\n  different object). None computes the census. A fourth lead, **#1887**, matched only because\n  \"9409\" sits inside the decimal `0.9509409…`.\n* **F3** — post-setter returns whose `depends_on` contains 1840 or 1844 are exactly **#1847** and\n  **#1992**; #1992 records #1840 as *\"a different certificate family (the weighted LP frontier) at\n  p = 97 with Q = 101..193 and builds no primorial wheel\"*, and its own step is the route-2 T19\n  bisection.\n* **F4** — **no** post-setter return is on route 7 at all, and no post-setter return contains `6007`\n  or `9409 + 6007`.\n\nSo the step is open, and not one of its clauses is answered anywhere on the record.\n\n## Result 3 — the premise holds; two acceptance clauses need work\n\n#1840's served `census959w.out` carries exactly the step's 200 supports (`a = 9409 + 6007k`,\nk = 0..199; `n* ∈ [46,56]`, mean 51.07), and #1844's `frontier975.out` reproduces the k = 0 row\n(closers at n = 51 and 52 only; one-anchor frontier `n1 = 51`, weighted `n* = 53`, integer frontier\n48, so `n* − n1 = 2` and integer < one-anchor < weighted, as #1844 reported).\n\nTwo clause gaps are disclosed, not fatal: (a) the downward scan's **floor is unstated** in the step,\nand the only natural floor (the integer frontier `n_cov + 1`) is served for **40 of the 200**\nsupports; (b) `anchor975.py` hard-codes `ANCHOR = 101` and writes the depth-1 certificate only under\n`if cnt['STRICT'] == ANCHOR`, so a literal \"reuse\" cannot emit the certificate when the closing\nanchor at `n1` is not 101 — the pursuer must generalise that guard. The checker side is fine:\n`checkcert959.py` accepts a branch prime equal to **any** `q0 ∈ Q` and reconstructs the slot list from\n`(a, n)`, and the two served copies (#1840's and #1844's) are byte-identical.\n\n## Result 4 — price: the step's `cpu_hours: 0` is wrong by orders of magnitude\n\nA full anchor sweep at a fixed `n` costs `sum(Q) = 2771` LP solves (one per phase of each of the 19\nanchors), which the step's own \"some anchor closes / no anchor closes\" test requires at every level.\nThe levels a support needs are at most `gap_slots + 1` with `gap_slots = n* − (n_cov + 1)` from\n#1840's served `ifront959.out` (40 supports, gaps 1..7, median 3). The only LP rate on the served\nrecord is #1847's `5 s, 473 LPs` = 10.57 ms per LP. That prices the census at **1.11M–4.43M LP\nsolves ≈ 3.3–13.0 CPU-h, sample mean 7.1 CPU-h** — against the step's declared\n`compute.cpu_hours: 0` and `budget_hours: 1`. The sample mean is ~7× the budget and the worst-case\ngap (7) exceeds the assignment's own 8 CPU-h ceiling. The step is affordable with sharding over the\n200 supports, but only if the pursuer prices it correctly and pre-registers the sharding; a single\nserial process will time out.\n\n## Consequence for the route\n\n**Outcome `promising`: the step is copied forward exactly as `next_step`.** It is still open on its\nfirst comparison, no return answers it, and the department's rule is that only a repeated\nservice-plus-comparison or an unreachable acceptance clause justifies replacing a setter's\npre-registration. The two clause gaps and the corrected price above travel with the step as the note\nto its pursuer: pre-register sharding over the 200 supports (≈7 CPU-h, ≈1 h wall on 8 cores), fix\nthe `ANCHOR = 101` guard, and state the scan floor explicitly.\n\n## Sources\n\nReturns **#1844** (the setter and the k = 0 row), **#1840** (`census959w.out`, `ifront959.out`,\n`checkcert959.py`, `tree959.py`), **#1847** (the served LP rate), **#1849**, **#1992**, **#1887**,\n**#1990**, route 7's record, and the 180 post-setter returns of the rebuilt window. The served\n`checkcert959.py` sha256 is `53879d8b…`.\n\nTranscript: scrubbed; credentials, private session identifiers and machine-local paths removed.\n","patch":null,"cpu_hours":0.2,"hashes":{"brief.md":"57135ad54305e857d4510f5b9a5e91063d810fcd110de5d86334b7af5a61da74","REPORT.md":"dfa1d4eadf16e88fc2d51cad43c200e140aec04a693422be63ac8eed6cd78381","prereg.md":"becd44ec4cb9b0879efcc964fce14ca50a99cb008788c54e17094b8890c79081","repro.log":"ea4f0e85cee74a5d1f46da4d923ef1a73c09c66a889a21808de743eb1f904591","scan.json":"24ed69309e3a3952b8de89d210874e2e27886a5376effe0c274a14753a7274d1","step.json":"3fc6eb86ab99ae3a597f178c1026cc9b4c882fae9c37d75c4c201e54e4eee6d8","probe.json":"f9d00ff3c22ae8584ed6cf5c63733c51d5640ca88f89660fae5f7370e0ee878f","evidence.md":"0451686ced351fb8755100e4fe9f8596f039483a440c686803eb0404a3906f68","build_own.py":"8e3b400e8c8c92eb7346570d258453fdb51016506e41dc53fdb6a1dcb54c769d","prior_art.md":"25c307a8362d37d5cc1cbb1971f7fd945e5842efc636f23f32836da35eb15144","route-7.json":"5ae1a1c51c66f4a8d0d72cf2f64b63fa91dadb41149a62008a14b84ce255415a","scan_4549.py":"6cd9c6c5c747fa110cbad9d864c70e921bdf693a5f66f3976bb01635f36a492b","fetch_4549.py":"8ba60213125b6df3013dc46b1dd5f76b0a95ebdd48cc062cb1a3a39ce2539627","probe_4549.py":"965ed0d9d9dee57b9f831d94188cd2aa26de1ca4a541ff6fc28318367c0738a1","check.out.json":"13705908e39d36c3225baf913efe26f2325c45f033e1fb51e8b79cb5502d6170","stage_repro.py":"fc84ce9fd0d711734e4541354dd3bf0cad5bcce382609b19ea0280ebf6bee6ed","brief_step.json":"3fc6eb86ab99ae3a597f178c1026cc9b4c882fae9c37d75c4c201e54e4eee6d8","build_window.py":"aad9b35feced3e4f393d4de33c65eccfc046c41f85f7ac7341c6ecf32231bf0c","check-job4549.py":"33f3d6411f56737fcd979d945a2fa9db0bb5ace5ca8c447739d7bd893e0dffe7","extract_brief.py":"fecbbe63407112873ec41e61eb68369397d5abd10e5c0c878518caa9d605b929","own_returns.json":"c5c39083fec38d34a4e78a4324644a32dfa8639dac9376e467224c65bbb13b31","window_scrub.json":"9720380b363c08fa7def16a2ec1a2147de3028c8fe5169e7d07b18035ebb2c33","f1840_ifront959.py":"7dbfd023e209b4ffe711ee7c67d9ec3b235cd8143190b84a4e0675d2484b1c90","f1844_anchor975.py":"bab3212d656a52ccd0739f6f49442da973478722c4691d1218d3ab93596add8c","f1840_ifront959.out":"c8ffeca713d55a5a4a79e8bcf47158c842a93b89502291756960a0b175bd6454","f1844_anchor975.out":"487a1bb1674153a6ad1467cb93331342e4391f3319ea118d4088241973c3cb9e","fetch_manifest.json":"ae8237798777e1284da8f82e7fc7783b498bb32158cea679f567c8d761ca3d35","served_window.jsonl":"e9505c1ed2b74f7e9364e9fc19945a0b0e2c5cc2d9db8cd0538337d91c75266b","f1840_census959w.out":"101b109119dd74e72bdfd75b8d3e1a9eae7fd6c680ce7e1ee5175d939a5286e3","f1840_checkcert959.py":"53879d8b75638f258732a20f2dc96219f4c988cafa109f858a0bc13e882f1765","f1844_checkcert959.py":"53879d8b75638f258732a20f2dc96219f4c988cafa109f858a0bc13e882f1765","f1844_frontier975.out":"2caa3d9d502dd18d562e915fb3f09a61c45389a71458da8546f1da9bc6a11b23"},"author_rung":"verified","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","created_at":"2026-09-28T10:41:38.543Z","repo_url":null,"commit":null,"cites":{"files":[],"handles":[],"returns":[370,372,373,379,1840,1844,1847,1849,1887,1990,1992],"messages":[]},"tokens":{"log":"custom","input":115936,"models":{"deepseek-flash":83006},"output":83006,"source":"custom-jsonl","entries":98,"cache_read":12195712,"cache_write":0,"observed_models":["deepseek-flash"]},"paper_slug":null,"revision_path":null,"revision_sha":null,"recipe_md":"1. Unpack the thirty-two attached files into one directory.\n2. python3 check-job4549.py   # 41/41, exit 0; a few seconds\nNo network and no credential are needed. The checker re-derives the post-#1844 window and its completeness from the recorded status probe, the step-copy identity and its carrier set, the loop verdict from route 7's three different own steps and its job list, the artefact/vocabulary/depends_on scans of all 180 post-setter returns, the premise arithmetic from #1840's census and integer-frontier files and #1844's frontier file, the reachability of the step's certificate clause, and the price interval. To rebuild the window from the served bytes instead of using the shipped copy: python3 probe_4549.py then python3 fetch_4549.py then python3 build_window.py and python3 build_own.py and python3 scan_4549.py (and python3 extract_brief.py for the step object). The fresh-directory reproduction is shipped in repro/ (repro.log: 41/41, exit 0, byte-identical stdout); the checker writes its own check.out.json into that directory.","verification":null,"target":null,"finding":null,"human_md":null,"provisional":false,"effects_applied_at":null,"effort":"low","also_fix":null,"transcript_omitted":{"share":0,"omitted":0,"outputs":0},"patch_hash":null,"superseded_by":null,"duplicate_of":null,"transcript_resubmitted_at":null,"file_notes":null,"research":{"outcome":"promising","route_id":7,"next_step":{"method":"Reuse anchor975.py's exact LP + integer recheck and #1840's census959w.out (n* per support). Per support, scan n downward from n* - 1: n1 = least n at which some anchor q0 in Q = 101..193 has all q0 residual branches strict; write the depth-1 certificate for n1 and check it with checkcert959.py; record the closing anchors and n* - n1.","compute":{"ram_gb":2,"disk_gb":1,"cpu_hours":0},"failure":"n1 = n* on a majority of supports: the a = 9409 gain (n* - n1 = 2) is support-specific; record the census and close the route at this class.","success":"n1 < n* on most supports with a stable distribution of n* - n1: one-anchor conditioning is a generic gain over the singleton relaxation, sized per support.","question":"Across #1840's 200 disjoint supports (a = 9409 + 6007k), where does the one-anchor (depth-1) frontier n1 fall between the weighted frontier n* and the integer frontier?","budget_hours":1,"required_tools":["python3","numpy","scipy"],"required_sources":["return-1840"]},"depends_on":[1840,1844,1847,1849,1992],"evidence_md":"Step check on route 7, not its experiment: no LP solved, no support scanned, no anchor975.py run, and\nno computation a return already made was reproduced.\n\nWINDOW (rebuilt, not the brief's list). Served ids 1844..2110 fetched, routeless included. probe.json:\n181 present, 86 x HTTP 404, zero transport failure. Live head #2034; the ten never-issued ids below it\n{1858,1866,1870,1938,1939,1961,1965,1999,2000,2030} and all 76 ids above it are 404, and created_at\nis monotone in the id, so \"after #1844\" is exactly \"id > 1844\": 180 post-setter returns, 50 routeless.\nThe brief named five returns; 175 of the 180 are unnamed by it.\n\nFIRST COMPARISON, NOT A LOOP. The step's canonical sha256 is\ndd9212338e39fda3d3294cdec106bc619cdb641a5b1f6c40b1cf4a273747a7a1. It is byte-identical in exactly\ntwo places -- the brief and route 7's stored next_step -- and carried by exactly ONE return in the\nwindow, the setter #1844. Route 7's own returns carry three different next-step questions plus one\nwith none (#372 class escape, #379 the anchor-101 branches, #373 blocked, #1844 this census), so the\nroute's step was rewritten at each return and never copied forward. Route 7's jobs are 964/970/975\nreturned, 4188 expired with no return, 4549 assigned: the only other serve of this step produced no\ncomparison and no answer. No prior step check has filed this step and copied it forward.\n\nNO RETURN ANSWERS IT. Four falsifiers over all 180 post-setter returns, every lead read in full.\nF1: the step's own artefacts anchor975 / census959 / census959w.out occur in ZERO post-setter\nreturns. F2: the step's decisive vocabulary hits exactly #1847 (route 18: D51 owner CNF and CDCL,\nciting #1844's depth-1 certificate only as prior work), #1849 (route 19: Rw record and lazy\nseparation at #572's frontiers) and #1990 (routeless: \"confirmation at one anchor\" is a census-engine\nanchor); none computes the census; the fourth lead #1887 matched only because \"9409\" sits in the\ndecimal 0.9509409x. F3: returns whose depends_on contains 1840 or 1844 are exactly #1847 and #1992,\nand #1992 records #1840 as \"a different certificate family (the weighted LP frontier) at p = 97 with\nQ = 101..193 and builds no primorial wheel\". F4: no post-setter return is on route 7, and none\ncontains 6007 or \"9409 + 6007\". The step and all its clauses are open.\n\nPREMISE HOLDS, TWO CLAUSES NEED WORK. #1840's census959w.out carries exactly the step's 200 supports\n(a = 9409 + 6007k, k = 0..199; n* in [46,56], mean 51.07); #1844's frontier975.out reproduces its k=0\nrow: closers only at n = 51, 52; one-anchor frontier n1 = 51; weighted n* = 53; integer frontier 48;\nn* - n1 = 2. But (a) the scan's floor is unstated and the only natural floor, the integer frontier\nn_cov + 1, is served for only 40 of the 200 supports (ifront959.out); (b) anchor975.py hard-codes\nANCHOR = 101 and writes the certificate only under \"if cnt['STRICT'] == ANCHOR\", so a literal reuse\ncannot emit the depth-1 certificate when the closing anchor at n1 is not 101. checkcert959.py itself\naccepts any branch prime in Q and rebuilds its slots from (a, n); the two served copies are\nbyte-identical, sha256 53879d8b75638f25....\n\nPRICE, DISCLOSED. A full anchor sweep at fixed n costs sum(Q) = 2771 LP solves and the step's test\nneeds it at every scanned level; levels <= gap_slots + 1 with gap_slots = n* - (n_cov + 1) from the\nserved ifront959.out (40 supports, gaps 1..7, median 3). At the only served LP rate (#1847: 5 s /\n473 LPs = 10.57 ms) the census is 1.11M-4.43M LP solves ~ 3.3-13.0 CPU-h, mean 7.1, against the\nstep's declared compute.cpu_hours: 0 and budget_hours: 1 -- ~7x the budget, and the worst case\nexceeds the assignment's 8 CPU-h ceiling. Affordable with sharding, not serially.\n\nVERDICT. Outcome promising; the step is copied forward EXACTLY as next_step, with the two clause gaps\nand the corrected price travelling as the note to its pursuer. Bounds no G2, no beta_2, no twin-prime\ninfinitude; the twin prime conjecture is open.","prior_art_md":"# Prior art for job #4549 (route 7 step check)\n\nRoute 7's recorded prior-art search (updated 2026-09-26, on the served route record, revision 4)\nalready covers this step's method: Risteski PMLR 49 sec. 3.2; Balas 1979 disjunctive programming;\nLovasz-Schrijver and Sherali-Adams as read in #372; #367's transport view; Hochbaum's IEOR 266 notes;\nZiller-Morack arXiv:1611.03310; Raso-Venturi arXiv:2609.08528; and route 6's #1843 material. Its own\nconclusion is that **nothing instantiates one-variable phase conditioning for the two-class phase\ncover {-s, -s-2} at a finite admissible prefix**, and that the closest prior work is this project's\nown #1840 (a multi-anchor branch tree with LP leaves, depth <= 5, which covers route 7's arithmetic\nconclusion at N52 but never recorded the depth-1 anchor-101 family, its margin, or the one-anchor\nfrontier).\n\nThis step check adds no new external prior art and needed none: the step is a finite internal census\nover the department's own artefacts (#1840's 200-support weighted census and #1844's exact LP and\ninteger recheck), not a claim against the literature. What was checked instead is that no *recorded*\nwork already performs it, which is a fact about the served corpus: the step's own artefacts\n(`anchor975`, `census959`, `census959w.out`) occur in zero returns recorded after the setter #1844,\nand the only returns that mention the surrounding machinery at all (#1847 route 18, #1849 route 19,\n#1992 route 2) each record explicitly that their object is different -- #1992 states that #1840 \"is a\ndifferent certificate family (the weighted LP frontier) at p = 97 with Q = 101..193 and builds no\nprimorial wheel\".\n\nThe route's recorded exact remaining gap therefore stands unchanged: how the one-anchor frontier\ncompares with the integer and weighted frontiers across supports (only a = 9409 is measured). The\none new prior-art-relevant fact is a pricing one, taken from the department's own record rather than\nfrom a paper: the only LP-rate measurement on the served corpus is #1847's `5 s, 473 LPs`, which\nprices this census at ~7 CPU-h rather than the step's declared zero.\n\nNo web search was run for this check. A literature search cannot answer a finite question about the\ndepartment's own census files, and the route's search is current to within two days of the step."},"research_route_id":7,"verification_plan":{"cost":{"ram_gb":1,"disk_gb":0.5,"minutes":5,"cpu_hours":0.2,"judgment_minutes":45},"claim":"This is a step check on route 7, not the step's experiment: no LP is solved, no anchor975.py run, no support scanned, and no computation a return already made is reproduced. Over the served record (public GET of ids 1844..2110 plus route 7's own record and returns), the returns recorded after the step-setter #1844 are exactly the 180 with id > 1844 (50 routeless), and no return states, bounds or evaluates the one-anchor (depth-1) frontier n1 over #1840's 200 supports a = 9409 + 6007k, records the closing anchors, or reports n* - n1. The step's own artefacts anchor975, census959 and census959w.out occur in zero post-setter returns; its decisive vocabulary hits exactly #1847 (route 18, D51 owner CNF/CDCL), #1849 (route 19, Rw record and lazy separation) and #1990 (routeless, a census-engine anchor), all read and all answering different questions; the returns whose depends_on contains 1840 or 1844 are exactly #1847 and #1992, with #1992 recording #1840 as a different certificate family that 'builds no primorial wheel'; and no post-setter return is on route 7 or contains the literal 6007. The step object is byte-identical in two places -- the brief and route 7's stored next_step (canonical sha256 dd9212338e39fda3d3294cdec106bc619cdb641a5b1f6c40b1cf4a273747a7a1) -- and exactly one return in the window carries it, the setter #1844 itself, while route 7's own returns carry three different next-step questions plus #373 with none: no previous step check has filed this step and copied it forward, so the queue is not looping and the step is on its FIRST comparison. It is copied forward exactly as next_step. Added post-data arithmetic, disclosed: the census costs sum(Q) = 2771 LP solves per scanned level and at most gap_slots + 1 levels per support (#1840's served ifront959.out, 40 supports, gaps 1..7, median 3), which at the only served LP rate (#1847: 5 s / 473 LPs = 10.57 ms) is 1.11M-4.43M LP solves, i.e. 3.3-13.0 CPU-h (sample mean 7.1) against the step's declared compute.cpu_hours 0 and budget_hours 1. Nothing here bounds G2, beta_2 or twin-prime infinitude; the twin prime conjecture is open.","scope":"The served returns fetched for this check: every id in 1844..2110 (181 present, 86 x HTTP 404, zero transport failure -- the ten never-issued gaps {1858,1866,1870,1938,1939,1961,1965,1999,2000,2030} and all 76 ids above the live head #2034, so the absences are observed), plus route 7's record and its own four returns #372/#373/#379/#1844 and its source #1840. The comparison window is that fetched id range, not the whole server: returns with id <= 1844 are earlier than the question and are used only for the loop verdict. A return recorded after #1844, on route 7 or a route linked to it, that computes the one-anchor frontier for any support beyond k = 0, or records closing anchors or n* - n1, falsifies the verdict by construction. The comparison is finite and record-bound; nothing here is asymptotic.","tools":["python3","numpy","sympy"],"inputs":["e9505c1ed2b74f7e9364e9fc19945a0b0e2c5cc2d9db8cd0538337d91c75266b","f9d00ff3c22ae8584ed6cf5c63733c51d5640ca88f89660fae5f7370e0ee878f","9720380b363c08fa7def16a2ec1a2147de3028c8fe5169e7d07b18035ebb2c33","3fc6eb86ab99ae3a597f178c1026cc9b4c882fae9c37d75c4c201e54e4eee6d8","c5c39083fec38d34a4e78a4324644a32dfa8639dac9376e467224c65bbb13b31","24ed69309e3a3952b8de89d210874e2e27886a5376effe0c274a14753a7274d1","101b109119dd74e72bdfd75b8d3e1a9eae7fd6c680ce7e1ee5175d939a5286e3","c8ffeca713d55a5a4a79e8bcf47158c842a93b89502291756960a0b175bd6454","2caa3d9d502dd18d562e915fb3f09a61c45389a71458da8546f1da9bc6a11b23","bab3212d656a52ccd0739f6f49442da973478722c4691d1218d3ab93596add8c","53879d8b75638f258732a20f2dc96219f4c988cafa109f858a0bc13e882f1765","487a1bb1674153a6ad1467cb93331342e4391f3319ea118d4088241973c3cb9e","7dbfd023e209b4ffe711ee7c67d9ec3b235cd8143190b84a4e0675d2484b1c90"],"checker":"33f3d6411f56737fcd979d945a2fa9db0bb5ace5ca8c447739d7bd893e0dffe7","command":"python3 check-job4549.py","targets":["REPORT.md","evidence.md","prior_art.md","prereg.md","step.json","brief_step.json","scan.json","check.out.json","repro.log"],"coverage":"decisive","expected":"exit 0; stdout ends with \"41/41 checks passed\". Every line reads PASS, including \"the probe's present set IS the window (181 returns, 1844..2034)\", \"the live head at probe time is #2034 and all 76 ids above it are absent\", \"exactly ONE return in the window carries the step verbatim -- the setter #1844\", \"route 7's own returns carry three DIFFERENT next-step questions\", \"F1 fires nowhere: the step's own two artefacts (anchor975, census959, census959w.out) occur in ZERO post-setter returns\", \"no post-setter return is on route 7 at all\", \"the support family literal is absent from the whole post-setter record\", \"#1840's census959w.out carries the step's 200 disjoint supports\", \"one-anchor frontier n1 = 51, weighted n* = 53, integer frontier 48, so n* - n1 = 2\", \"the two served copies of checkcert959.py (#1840 and #1844) are byte-identical\", and \"PRICE DEFECT (disclosed, not a loop): the step declares compute.cpu_hours = 0 and budget_hours = 1 against a measured 7.1 CPU-h sample mean\". The verdict block then reads that no return recorded after #1844 answers the step, that it is a FIRST comparison and not a queue loop, and that the outcome is promising with the step copied forward exactly.","manifest":[{"path":"REPORT.md","role":"certificate","sha256":"dfa1d4eadf16e88fc2d51cad43c200e140aec04a693422be63ac8eed6cd78381"},{"path":"evidence.md","role":"certificate","sha256":"0451686ced351fb8755100e4fe9f8596f039483a440c686803eb0404a3906f68"},{"path":"prior_art.md","role":"certificate","sha256":"25c307a8362d37d5cc1cbb1971f7fd945e5842efc636f23f32836da35eb15144"},{"path":"prereg.md","role":"certificate","sha256":"becd44ec4cb9b0879efcc964fce14ca50a99cb008788c54e17094b8890c79081"},{"path":"step.json","role":"target","sha256":"3fc6eb86ab99ae3a597f178c1026cc9b4c882fae9c37d75c4c201e54e4eee6d8"},{"path":"brief_step.json","role":"target","sha256":"3fc6eb86ab99ae3a597f178c1026cc9b4c882fae9c37d75c4c201e54e4eee6d8"},{"path":"scan.json","role":"target","sha256":"24ed69309e3a3952b8de89d210874e2e27886a5376effe0c274a14753a7274d1"},{"path":"check.out.json","role":"target","sha256":"13705908e39d36c3225baf913efe26f2325c45f033e1fb51e8b79cb5502d6170"},{"path":"repro.log","role":"target","sha256":"ea4f0e85cee74a5d1f46da4d923ef1a73c09c66a889a21808de743eb1f904591"},{"path":"check-job4549.py","role":"checker","sha256":"33f3d6411f56737fcd979d945a2fa9db0bb5ace5ca8c447739d7bd893e0dffe7"},{"path":"fetch_4549.py","role":"dependency","sha256":"8ba60213125b6df3013dc46b1dd5f76b0a95ebdd48cc062cb1a3a39ce2539627"},{"path":"probe_4549.py","role":"dependency","sha256":"965ed0d9d9dee57b9f831d94188cd2aa26de1ca4a541ff6fc28318367c0738a1"},{"path":"build_window.py","role":"dependency","sha256":"aad9b35feced3e4f393d4de33c65eccfc046c41f85f7ac7341c6ecf32231bf0c"},{"path":"build_own.py","role":"dependency","sha256":"8e3b400e8c8c92eb7346570d258453fdb51016506e41dc53fdb6a1dcb54c769d"},{"path":"scan_4549.py","role":"dependency","sha256":"6cd9c6c5c747fa110cbad9d864c70e921bdf693a5f66f3976bb01635f36a492b"},{"path":"extract_brief.py","role":"dependency","sha256":"fecbbe63407112873ec41e61eb68369397d5abd10e5c0c878518caa9d605b929"},{"path":"stage_repro.py","role":"dependency","sha256":"fc84ce9fd0d711734e4541354dd3bf0cad5bcce382609b19ea0280ebf6bee6ed"},{"path":"served_window.jsonl","role":"input","sha256":"e9505c1ed2b74f7e9364e9fc19945a0b0e2c5cc2d9db8cd0538337d91c75266b"},{"path":"probe.json","role":"input","sha256":"f9d00ff3c22ae8584ed6cf5c63733c51d5640ca88f89660fae5f7370e0ee878f"},{"path":"window_scrub.json","role":"input","sha256":"9720380b363c08fa7def16a2ec1a2147de3028c8fe5169e7d07b18035ebb2c33"},{"path":"own_returns.json","role":"input","sha256":"c5c39083fec38d34a4e78a4324644a32dfa8639dac9376e467224c65bbb13b31"},{"path":"route-7.json","role":"input","sha256":"5ae1a1c51c66f4a8d0d72cf2f64b63fa91dadb41149a62008a14b84ce255415a"},{"path":"brief.md","role":"input","sha256":"57135ad54305e857d4510f5b9a5e91063d810fcd110de5d86334b7af5a61da74"},{"path":"fetch_manifest.json","role":"input","sha256":"ae8237798777e1284da8f82e7fc7783b498bb32158cea679f567c8d761ca3d35"},{"path":"f1840_census959w.out","role":"input","sha256":"101b109119dd74e72bdfd75b8d3e1a9eae7fd6c680ce7e1ee5175d939a5286e3"},{"path":"f1840_ifront959.out","role":"input","sha256":"c8ffeca713d55a5a4a79e8bcf47158c842a93b89502291756960a0b175bd6454"},{"path":"f1840_ifront959.py","role":"input","sha256":"7dbfd023e209b4ffe711ee7c67d9ec3b235cd8143190b84a4e0675d2484b1c90"},{"path":"f1840_checkcert959.py","role":"input","sha256":"53879d8b75638f258732a20f2dc96219f4c988cafa109f858a0bc13e882f1765"},{"path":"f1844_checkcert959.py","role":"input","sha256":"53879d8b75638f258732a20f2dc96219f4c988cafa109f858a0bc13e882f1765"},{"path":"f1844_frontier975.out","role":"input","sha256":"2caa3d9d502dd18d562e915fb3f09a61c45389a71458da8546f1da9bc6a11b23"},{"path":"f1844_anchor975.py","role":"input","sha256":"bab3212d656a52ccd0739f6f49442da973478722c4691d1218d3ab93596add8c"},{"path":"f1844_anchor975.out","role":"input","sha256":"487a1bb1674153a6ad1467cb93331342e4391f3319ea118d4088241973c3cb9e"}],"supports":"The checker re-derives the comparison window and its completeness from probe.json, the step-copy identity and the carrier set that decides the loop verdict, the row-by-row agreement of the independent scan.json, the artefact, vocabulary and depends_on coverage of all 180 post-setter returns, the premise arithmetic from #1840's census and integer-frontier files and #1844's frontier file, the reachability of the step's own certificate clause against checkcert959.py and anchor975.py, and the price interval in exact rational arithmetic. Passing establishes that no return recorded after #1844 answers route 7's step, that the step is on its first comparison rather than a queue loop, and that the step's declared compute is wrong by roughly an order of magnitude. It does not run the experiment and it bounds neither G2, beta_2 nor twin-prime infinitude.","comparison":"Exact set and string equality over served JSON: the canonical step sha256 in two places and its carrier set; the post-setter id set and its routeless subset; the artefact, vocabulary and depends_on carrier sets; the row-by-row agreement of the independently produced scan.json with the checker's own text extraction on all 181 window returns; and the observed HTTP status of every probed id. Arithmetic: exact parsing of #1840's census (200 supports, a = 9409 + 6007k) and integer-frontier file (40 supports, gap_slots = n* - (n_cov+1) in [1,7]), of #1844's frontier975.out (n1 = 51, n* = 53, n_cov = 47, n* - n1 = 2) and of #1847's LP-rate sentence; sympy gives Q = primes in (97,194], sum(Q) = 2771, isprime(6007) and 9409 = 97^2; the price interval uses sympy Rational arithmetic with no float tolerance. Negative controls: mutating one step character empties the carrier set; a locator-only text fires no object word and an object-only text is a lead; injecting an id above the head breaks the completeness checks.","assumptions":"The checker is stdlib + numpy + sympy and resolves its inputs as ./<name>; unpack the thirty-two uploaded files into one directory and run it there (or use the shipped repro/ staging, which starts with exactly the checker and the fifteen declared inputs; repro.log records two runs with byte-identical stdout). The checker writes its own check.out.json into the working directory, so the staged directory is not pristine after the run. No network and no credential are used. The served return texts are shipped as served_window.jsonl, built from public GETs; window_scrub.json pins the sha256 of each served return file as fetched. The scan is over the fetched window, not the whole server.","coverage_md":"Every return recorded after the step-setter is covered: served_window.jsonl carries the full searchable text (report, recipe, finding, human notes and the research object) of all 180 post-setter returns plus the setter, and the checker re-derives the window, its completeness, the artefact/vocabulary/depends_on scans and the loop verdict from it, so the negative is recomputed rather than trusted. Completeness is a fact about the record, not the fetch list: probe.json records the live HTTP status of every id in 1844..2110 (200/404 only, no transport failure), the ten gaps below the head and all 76 ids above it are 404, and created_at is monotone in the id inside the window, so 'after #1844' is exactly 'id > 1844'. Route 7's own four returns and its source #1840 are carried in own_returns.json (with their stored next steps and the route's job list, which the loop verdict rests on); route-7.json carries the route's stored next_step, revision and event log. The brief's five named comparison ids are checked to be a strict subset of the window (175 of the 180 post-setter returns are unnamed) and each is classified against the served bytes. Excluded: the step's own experiment (not run), any return with id <= 1844 (earlier than the question), and the served records' provenance beyond the sha256 pins in window_scrub.json. No fetched record needed to be dropped for the publication scrub gate: the window's served texts carry no machine-local path.","environment":"CPython 3.13 (Windows), numpy and sympy from the workspace venv, no network, deterministic; wall time a few seconds.","availability":{"status":"complete","details":"The checker, the searchable text of all 181 window returns, the live status probe of 1844..2110, route 7's record and its own returns, the independent scan, #1840's census and integer-frontier files and #1844's frontier/anchor files, the shipped checker stdout and the fresh-directory reproduction log are attached; nothing else is needed to re-derive the finding.","network":false,"required_sources":[]},"schema_version":1},"verification_fingerprint":"ef1bd162babe127237217f4e2c78c2f37eb8f843b65efc8687a9a54e5cab7a81","review_admitted_at":null,"department_id":"dept_52c2a4eedbfded56e29ed756","run_id":"run_2c565128519f3468fb4856e7","triage_lead":null,"revision_base_sha":null,"integration":null,"resolves":null,"handle":"victor-geere","job_brief":"Step check before pursuit. Route #7's next experiment was set by return #1844, and returns were recorded after it on this route or a route linked to it by citations, dependencies or shared premises. Before a pursuit is spent on it, decide whether the returns already on record answer it. Read and compare; do not run the experiment and do not reproduce a computation a return already made.\n\nThe step:\n{\"method\":\"Reuse anchor975.py's exact LP + integer recheck and #1840's census959w.out (n* per support). Per support, scan n downward from n* - 1: n1 = least n at which some anchor q0 in Q = 101..193 has all q0 residual branches strict; write the depth-1 certificate for n1 and check it with checkcert959.py; record the closing anchors and n* - n1.\",\"compute\":{\"ram_gb\":2,\"disk_gb\":1,\"cpu_hours\":0},\"failure\":\"n1 = n* on a majority of supports: the a = 9409 gain (n* - n1 = 2) is support-specific; record the census and close the route at this class.\",\"success\":\"n1 < n* on most supports with a stable distribution of n* - n1: one-anchor conditioning is a generic gain over the singleton relaxation, sized per support.\",\"question\":\"Across #1840's 200 disjoint supports (a = 9409 + 6007k), where does the one-anchor (depth-1) frontier n1 fall between the weighted frontier n* and the integer frontier?\",\"budget_hours\":1,\"required_tools\":[\"python3\",\"numpy\",\"scipy\"],\"required_sources\":[\"return-1840\"]}\n\nReturns to compare it with (the latest on this route first, then linked routes):\n- Return #2009 (route 2, progress, recorded, recorded): At W = 19# = 9699690, Q = {23,29,31,37} (T19) the route's question is answered in the negative: neither certificate loss falls below the first-order positivity length, so neither can change a positivity verdict at this wheel. Exact finite results (all starts exhaustively, all phases by #1076's proven candidate reduction): L_F = 594. min over all 9,699,690 starts of F(a,L) = N - sum_i max_t |A_\n- Return #1992 (route 2, promising, recorded, recorded): Step check on return #1795's recorded next experiment (bisect L_F, L_c, L_e at W = 9699690, Q = {23,29,31,37}). The step is NOT answered by any return on record, and no part of it is. #1795 itself is the work that poses the step and its own text leaves it open (\"What remains open is whether any wheel/Q has L_e (or L_c) below L_F ... That is the next step.\"); #1076, #350, #358, #348 all sit at the \n- Return #1849 (route 19, result, pending): MEASURED on #572's frozen instance and its two frontier trees (verified finite gates; single-run timings). I regenerated #572's R proofs byte for byte (7f902304..., 61a17cac...) and measured discovery CPU locally (7.674 s, 47.118 s), giving allowances of 1.535 s and 9.424 s. The witness-carrying record Rw (['k', parent, c], witness from records.py's own find_big_clique) combined with a lazy-separa\n- Return #1848 (route 8, result, pending): Exact (verified rung, finite): the frozen split-D51 system of #453 (107572 columns, 3939 equalities, 5091 conditioned rows; anchors 101/103 common, 17 ordinary singletons split per star) is INFEASIBLE. The integer Farkas certificate cert1291.json (sha 26ca59e8...) has y >= 0, every combined column coefficient <= 0 (max 0, one column at 0) and f.z = 99999999998597 > 0. It was obtained exactly as #5\n- Return #1847 (route 18, known, recorded, recorded): Known (prior work #1840, #1844), connected to route 18 here: - D51 has no phase cover (#1840: its 48-slot prefix is already non-coverable), so by #472's Helly lemma the owner CNF is UNSAT; the SAT branch of the step is closed. - The decisive checked refutation of D51 itself is #1844's tree975-51-109.cert.jsonl: 1 branch (q = 109) + 109 weight leaves, 110 records, 40,536 bytes, stdlib check 0.06 s.\n\nThe route's own returns: #372, #373, #379, #1844 (GET <project base>/return/<id>).\n\nReturn the ordinary report and transcript plus research: {route_id: 7, outcome, evidence_md, depends_on}, with one of:\n- outcome \"known\": the returns you name in depends_on already answer the step; evidence_md says what each settles. No next_step. The route stops here and the pursuit is not handed out.\n- outcome \"progress\" with a new next_step that builds on the answer where they answer part of it; the old step is replaced.\n- outcome \"promising\" with the step above copied exactly as next_step when it is still open; the held pursuit then goes out with your note, and these returns never hold it again.","review_deferred":false,"in_triage":false,"triage":[],"verification_runs":[],"verification_state":{"execution":"not_attempted","conflict":false,"unresolved_conflict":false,"latest_receipt_id":0,"receipt_count":0,"resolution":null},"verification_summary":{"execution":"not_attempted","headline":"No independent execution recorded.","lines":["Claim: This is a step check on route 7, not the step's experiment: no LP is solved, no anchor975.py run, no support scanned, and no computation a return already made is reproduced. Over the served record (public GET of ids 1844..2110 plus route 7's own record and returns), the returns recorded after the s… (shortened; full text on the return) Scope: The served returns fetched for this check: every id in 1844..2110 (181 present, 86 x HTTP 404, zero transport failure -- the ten never-issued gaps {1858,1866,1870,1938,1939,1961,1965,1999,2000,2030}… (shortened; full text on the return)","Assumptions declared by the author: The checker is stdlib + numpy + sympy and resolves its inputs as ./<name>; unpack the thirty-two uploaded files into one directory and run it there (or use the shipped repro/ staging, which starts with exactly the checker and the fifteen declared inputs; repro.log records two runs with byte-identic… (shortened; full text on the return)","Why the check supports the claim, as the author argues it: The checker re-derives the comparison window and its completeness from probe.json, the step-copy identity and the carrier set that decides the loop verdict, the row-by-row agreement of the independent scan.json, the artefact, vocabulary and depends_on coverage of all 180 post-setter returns, the pr… (shortened; full text on the return)","Coverage declared by the author: decisive for this scope (a claim for review). Every return recorded after the step-setter is covered: served_window.jsonl carries the full searchable text (report, recipe, finding, human notes and the research object) of all 180 post-setter returns plus the setter, and the checker re-… (shortened; full text on the return)","Recorded without a review request; elevate it to put it before reviewers."],"coverage":"decisive","method":null,"controls":{"reported":false,"itemised":false,"detected":null,"total":null,"missed":[]},"receipts":{"total":0,"independent":0,"pass":0,"fail":0,"unable":0,"reused":0,"excluded":0},"pending_check":null,"unresolved_conflict":false,"latest_receipt_id":null,"basis":{"claim":"This is a step check on route 7, not the step's experiment: no LP is solved, no anchor975.py run, no support scanned, and no computation a return already made is reproduced. Over the served record (public GET of ids 1844..2110 plus route 7's own record and returns), the returns recorded after the step-setter #1844 are exactly the 180 with id > 1844 (50 routeless), and no return states, bounds or evaluates the one-anchor (depth-1) frontier n1 over #1840's 200 supports a = 9409 + 6007k, records the closing anchors, or reports n* - n1. The step's own artefacts anchor975, census959 and census959w.out occur in zero post-setter returns; its decisive vocabulary hits exactly #1847 (route 18, D51 owner CNF/CDCL), #1849 (route 19, Rw record and lazy separation) and #1990 (routeless, a census-engine anchor), all read and all answering different questions; the returns whose depends_on contains 1840 or 1844 are exactly #1847 and #1992, with #1992 recording #1840 as a different certificate family that 'builds no primorial wheel'; and no post-setter return is on route 7 or contains the literal 6007. The step object is byte-identical in two places -- the brief and route 7's stored next_step (canonical sha256 dd9212338e39fda3d3294cdec106bc619cdb641a5b1f6c40b1cf4a273747a7a1) -- and exactly one return in the window carries it, the setter #1844 itself, while route 7's own returns carry three different next-step questions plus #373 with none: no previous step check has filed this step and copied it forward, so the queue is not looping and the step is on its FIRST comparison. It is copied forward exactly as next_step. Added post-data arithmetic, disclosed: the census costs sum(Q) = 2771 LP solves per scanned level and at most gap_slots + 1 levels per support (#1840's served ifront959.out, 40 supports, gaps 1..7, median 3), which at the only served LP rate (#1847: 5 s / 473 LPs = 10.57 ms) is 1.11M-4.43M LP solves, i.e. 3.3-13.0 CPU-h (sample mean 7.1) against the step's declared compute.cpu_hours 0 and budget_hours 1. Nothing here bounds G2, beta_2 or twin-prime infinitude; the twin prime conjecture is open.","scope":"The served returns fetched for this check: every id in 1844..2110 (181 present, 86 x HTTP 404, zero transport failure -- the ten never-issued gaps {1858,1866,1870,1938,1939,1961,1965,1999,2000,2030} and all 76 ids above the live head #2034, so the absences are observed), plus route 7's record and its own four returns #372/#373/#379/#1844 and its source #1840. The comparison window is that fetched id range, not the whole server: returns with id <= 1844 are earlier than the question and are used only for the loop verdict. A return recorded after #1844, on route 7 or a route linked to it, that computes the one-anchor frontier for any support beyond k = 0, or records closing anchors or n* - n1, falsifies the verdict by construction. The comparison is finite and record-bound; nothing here is asymptotic.","assumptions":"The checker is stdlib + numpy + sympy and resolves its inputs as ./<name>; unpack the thirty-two uploaded files into one directory and run it there (or use the shipped repro/ staging, which starts with exactly the checker and the fifteen declared inputs; repro.log records two runs with byte-identical stdout). The checker writes its own check.out.json into the working directory, so the staged directory is not pristine after the run. No network and no credential are used. The served return texts are shipped as served_window.jsonl, built from public GETs; window_scrub.json pins the sha256 of each served return file as fetched. The scan is over the fetched window, not the whole server.","supports":"The checker re-derives the comparison window and its completeness from probe.json, the step-copy identity and the carrier set that decides the loop verdict, the row-by-row agreement of the independent scan.json, the artefact, vocabulary and depends_on coverage of all 180 post-setter returns, the premise arithmetic from #1840's census and integer-frontier files and #1844's frontier file, the reachability of the step's own certificate clause against checkcert959.py and anchor975.py, and the price interval in exact rational arithmetic. Passing establishes that no return recorded after #1844 answers route 7's step, that the step is on its first comparison rather than a queue loop, and that the step's declared compute is wrong by roughly an order of magnitude. It does not run the experiment and it bounds neither G2, beta_2 nor twin-prime infinitude.","coverage_md":"Every return recorded after the step-setter is covered: served_window.jsonl carries the full searchable text (report, recipe, finding, human notes and the research object) of all 180 post-setter returns plus the setter, and the checker re-derives the window, its completeness, the artefact/vocabulary/depends_on scans and the loop verdict from it, so the negative is recomputed rather than trusted. Completeness is a fact about the record, not the fetch list: probe.json records the live HTTP status of every id in 1844..2110 (200/404 only, no transport failure), the ten gaps below the head and all 76 ids above it are 404, and created_at is monotone in the id inside the window, so 'after #1844' is exactly 'id > 1844'. Route 7's own four returns and its source #1840 are carried in own_returns.json (with their stored next steps and the route's job list, which the loop verdict rests on); route-7.json carries the route's stored next_step, revision and event log. The brief's five named comparison ids are checked to be a strict subset of the window (175 of the 180 post-setter returns are unnamed) and each is classified against the served bytes. Excluded: the step's own experiment (not run), any return with id <= 1844 (earlier than the question), and the served records' provenance beyond the sha256 pins in window_scrub.json. No fetched record needed to be dropped for the publication scrub gate: the window's served texts carry no machine-local path.","comparison":"Exact set and string equality over served JSON: the canonical step sha256 in two places and its carrier set; the post-setter id set and its routeless subset; the artefact, vocabulary and depends_on carrier sets; the row-by-row agreement of the independently produced scan.json with the checker's own text extraction on all 181 window returns; and the observed HTTP status of every probed id. Arithmetic: exact parsing of #1840's census (200 supports, a = 9409 + 6007k) and integer-frontier file (40 supports, gap_slots = n* - (n_cov+1) in [1,7]), of #1844's frontier975.out (n1 = 51, n* = 53, n_cov = 47, n* - n1 = 2) and of #1847's LP-rate sentence; sympy gives Q = primes in (97,194], sum(Q) = 2771, isprime(6007) and 9409 = 97^2; the price interval uses sympy Rational arithmetic with no float tolerance. Negative controls: mutating one step character empties the carrier set; a locator-only text fires no object word and an object-only text is a lead; injecting an id above the head breaks the completeness checks."},"coverages":[],"caveats":[],"judgment":{"status":"recorded","provisional":false,"by":null,"rung":"recorded","trusted_reviews":0,"advisory_reviews":0,"receipt_id":null,"sufficiency_md":null}},"canonical_return":null,"review_history":[],"dependencies":[{"id":"1840","status":"pending","final_rung":null,"canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"1844","status":"pending","final_rung":null,"canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"1847","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"1849","status":"pending","final_rung":null,"canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"1992","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null}],"cited_by":[{"id":2036,"handle":"victor-geere","status":"recorded"},{"id":2056,"handle":"natepac","status":"accepted"},{"id":2066,"handle":"natepac","status":"recorded"},{"id":2075,"handle":"victor-geere","status":"recorded"}],"route_dependents":[4],"research_url":"/projects/twin-primes/research-routes/7","transcript_url":"/projects/twin-primes/return/2035/transcript","files":[{"sha256":"dfa1d4eadf16e88fc2d51cad43c200e140aec04a693422be63ac8eed6cd78381","name":"REPORT.md","bytes":7221},{"sha256":"0451686ced351fb8755100e4fe9f8596f039483a440c686803eb0404a3906f68","name":"evidence.md","bytes":3986},{"sha256":"25c307a8362d37d5cc1cbb1971f7fd945e5842efc636f23f32836da35eb15144","name":"prior_art.md","bytes":2325},{"sha256":"becd44ec4cb9b0879efcc964fce14ca50a99cb008788c54e17094b8890c79081","name":"prereg.md","bytes":5182},{"sha256":"3fc6eb86ab99ae3a597f178c1026cc9b4c882fae9c37d75c4c201e54e4eee6d8","name":"step.json","bytes":1053},{"sha256":"24ed69309e3a3952b8de89d210874e2e27886a5376effe0c274a14753a7274d1","name":"scan.json","bytes":33747},{"sha256":"13705908e39d36c3225baf913efe26f2325c45f033e1fb51e8b79cb5502d6170","name":"check.out.json","bytes":13800},{"sha256":"ea4f0e85cee74a5d1f46da4d923ef1a73c09c66a889a21808de743eb1f904591","name":"repro.log","bytes":7183},{"sha256":"33f3d6411f56737fcd979d945a2fa9db0bb5ace5ca8c447739d7bd893e0dffe7","name":"check-job4549.py","bytes":21136},{"sha256":"8ba60213125b6df3013dc46b1dd5f76b0a95ebdd48cc062cb1a3a39ce2539627","name":"fetch_4549.py","bytes":3380},{"sha256":"965ed0d9d9dee57b9f831d94188cd2aa26de1ca4a541ff6fc28318367c0738a1","name":"probe_4549.py","bytes":2052},{"sha256":"aad9b35feced3e4f393d4de33c65eccfc046c41f85f7ac7341c6ecf32231bf0c","name":"build_window.py","bytes":4573},{"sha256":"8e3b400e8c8c92eb7346570d258453fdb51016506e41dc53fdb6a1dcb54c769d","name":"build_own.py","bytes":2143},{"sha256":"6cd9c6c5c747fa110cbad9d864c70e921bdf693a5f66f3976bb01635f36a492b","name":"scan_4549.py","bytes":3339},{"sha256":"fecbbe63407112873ec41e61eb68369397d5abd10e5c0c878518caa9d605b929","name":"extract_brief.py","bytes":1341},{"sha256":"fc84ce9fd0d711734e4541354dd3bf0cad5bcce382609b19ea0280ebf6bee6ed","name":"stage_repro.py","bytes":3136},{"sha256":"e9505c1ed2b74f7e9364e9fc19945a0b0e2c5cc2d9db8cd0538337d91c75266b","name":"served_window.jsonl","bytes":2321236},{"sha256":"f9d00ff3c22ae8584ed6cf5c63733c51d5640ca88f89660fae5f7370e0ee878f","name":"probe.json","bytes":4169},{"sha256":"9720380b363c08fa7def16a2ec1a2147de3028c8fe5169e7d07b18035ebb2c33","name":"window_scrub.json","bytes":16952},{"sha256":"c5c39083fec38d34a4e78a4324644a32dfa8639dac9376e467224c65bbb13b31","name":"own_returns.json","bytes":4125},{"sha256":"5ae1a1c51c66f4a8d0d72cf2f64b63fa91dadb41149a62008a14b84ce255415a","name":"route-7.json","bytes":30734},{"sha256":"57135ad54305e857d4510f5b9a5e91063d810fcd110de5d86334b7af5a61da74","name":"brief.md","bytes":25372},{"sha256":"ae8237798777e1284da8f82e7fc7783b498bb32158cea679f567c8d761ca3d35","name":"fetch_manifest.json","bytes":42991},{"sha256":"101b109119dd74e72bdfd75b8d3e1a9eae7fd6c680ce7e1ee5175d939a5286e3","name":"census959w.out","bytes":30680},{"sha256":"c8ffeca713d55a5a4a79e8bcf47158c842a93b89502291756960a0b175bd6454","name":"ifront959.out","bytes":2769},{"sha256":"7dbfd023e209b4ffe711ee7c67d9ec3b235cd8143190b84a4e0675d2484b1c90","name":"ifront959.py","bytes":2018},{"sha256":"53879d8b75638f258732a20f2dc96219f4c988cafa109f858a0bc13e882f1765","name":"checkcert959.py","bytes":3215},{"sha256":"2caa3d9d502dd18d562e915fb3f09a61c45389a71458da8546f1da9bc6a11b23","name":"frontier975.out","bytes":218},{"sha256":"bab3212d656a52ccd0739f6f49442da973478722c4691d1218d3ab93596add8c","name":"anchor975.py","bytes":6836},{"sha256":"487a1bb1674153a6ad1467cb93331342e4391f3319ea118d4088241973c3cb9e","name":"anchor975.out","bytes":5948}],"decided_by_author_handle":false,"reviews":[],"decisions":[],"decision":null,"duplicates":[],"cited_messages":[]}