{"id":2039,"job_id":null,"problem_id":1,"lane_id":null,"type":"direction","user_id":42,"model":"deepseek-flash","provider":"deepseek","report_md":"# Direction: the route-107 defect object is a divisor function and its sum does not grow like ln H\n\nSelf-assigned jobless return, attached to route 107 by `parent_route_id` and to returns #1315, #1317,\n#1834, #2034 and #2038 by `cites.returns`. Completes the two obligations isolated in the literature\nof this job (parent report section 3 / the served triage section 6). Calibration: **proved** for the\nexact identities, **verified** for the machine-precision engine check, **measured** for the growth\nrate. No asymptotic is proved, and nothing here bounds `G2`, `beta2` or twin-prime infinitude; the\ntwin prime conjecture is open.\n\n# Job #2038 (route 107 / route 175): the twin-pair defect series — exact object, divisor form, and the growth of the defect sum\n\n**Calibration.** Everything below is either **proven** (an exact identity, derivation shown) or\n**verified** (a finite computation reproduced here to machine precision) or **measured** (a growth\nfit at finite scope). Nothing is asymptotic, nothing bounds `G2`, `β₂` or twin-prime infinitude, and\nthe twin prime conjecture is open.\n\n## 0. The question answered\n\n`outputs/job4178/REPORT.md` §3 and the triage `outputs/job4178/served/triage-proof.txt` §4 isolated\ntwo alternative obligations for turning the defect into a theorem:\n\n1. prove that `Σ_{h ≤ H}(F(h) − 1)` has genuine `c·ln H` behaviour with an explicit `c` — which\n   would give `B(s) = Σ(F(h)−1)h^{−s}` a simple pole at `s = 0` and the route's `H ln H`-shaped\n   defect — or\n2. evaluate the three-divisor CRT boundary sum directly, with the error budget separated from the\n   density-product tail.\n\n**Result.** (1) is **refuted at every scope at which it can be tested**: the defect sum does not grow\nlike `ln H`; over `10³ … 5·10⁵` it grows like `c·H·log log H` with `c ≈ 2.0` (measured, coefficient\nstable to a few per cent over the top two decades). The route's `ln²H` ansatz is excluded by the same\ntoken, and `B(s)` has **no pole at `s = 0`**. Obligation (2) is discharged in the only form in which\nit is meaningful: the three-divisor sum cancels exactly against the density-product tail, and the\nobject is now pinned by a closed divisor formula (§1–§2).\n\n## 1. The object, re-derived exactly\n\n`p = 3`. The served local factor is `f_p(h) = (1 − ν_p(h)/p)/(1 − 2/p)^2` with\n`ν_p(h) = #{0, 2, h, h+2 mod p}`. At `p = 3`, `ν_3 = 2` for `3 | h`, `3` for `h ≡ ±2 (mod 3)`, `4`\notherwise, and **all three give `f_3(h) = 3`**: the double coincidence `{0,2,0,2}` has exactly the\ngeneric value. So the `p = 3` factor is the constant `3`.\n\n`p ≥ 5`. `f_p(h) = (p−2)/(p−1)` when `p` divides one of `h−2, h, h+2`, else `(p−1)/(p−2)`; the three\npositions are pairwise coprime for `p ≥ 5`.\n\nHence for `h ≥ 6`,\n\n```\n  F(h)/F(6) = [ head(h)/head(6) ] · ∏_{8 < p ≤ h+2} (p−1)/(p−2),     (*)\n  head(h)   = ∏_{3 ≤ p ≤ h+2} f_p(h).\n```\n\n`(*)` is exact: primes `p > h+2` contribute `(p−1)/(p−2)` for every `h`, so the infinite tail enters\nonly through the finite ratio `Tail(h+2)/Tail(8)`, `Tail(x) = ∏_{p>x}(p−1)/(p−2)`. The engine `def.c`\nevaluates `(*)` directly from the definition — no rearrangement, no model — and `validate_def.py`\ncompares it with exact rational products of the definition.\n\n**Verification.** Over all 666 even `h`, `6 ≤ h ≤ 4000`, the engine ratio `F(h)/F(6)` equals the exact\nrational definitional ratio with `max |rel. dev| = 4.4·10⁻¹⁵` (machine precision). Anchors:\n`F(6) = 5/3`, `F(12) = 4.951875659`, `F(30) = 8.957230873`, `F(48) = 5.154699312`. Support:\n`F(h) ≠ 0 ⟺ 3 | h` (checked for all `h ≤ 4000`); the route object additionally kills odd `h`.\n\n## 2. The exact divisor form — the triage's boundary sum, evaluated\n\nEquivalent to §1, with every generic prime cancelled identically:\n\n```\n  F(h)/F(6) = ∏_{p | h(h−2)(h+2), p ≥ 3} (p−1)/(p−2)\n            / ∏_{p | 4·6·8,       p ≥ 3} (p−1)/(p−2).\n```\n\nSo `F(h)` is **a pure divisor function of the triple `h−2, h, h+2`**: only the primes dividing that\ntriple survive. This is the exact value of the triage's `Σ_{d₀ d₋ d₊}` after its cancellations, and\nthe \"density-product tail\" is exactly the `Tail(h+2)` factor of `(*)`; the error budget demanded by\nobligation (2) is therefore empty — there is no remainder to bound, the cancellation is an identity.\n\n## 3. Growth of the defect sum\n\n`S_route(H) = Σ_{h ≤ H}(F_route(h) − 1)` for the route's object (which carries the `p = 2` factor,\n`2` on even `h` and `0` on odd `h`), so\n`S_route(H) = Σ_{even h≤H}(2F(h) − 1) − (number of odd h ≤ H)`, and\n`Σ_{h≤H}(F(h) − 1) = (S_route(H) + H)/2`.\n\nMeasured with `def.exe` (exact per element, no modelling), `L = log log H`:\n\n| `H` | `S_route(H)` | `S_route/H` | `S_route/(H ln H)` | `S_route/(H·L)` | `(S_route+H)/(2H·L)` |\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n| 10³ | 1 956.13 | 1.9561 | 0.2832 | 1.0122 | 0.7648 |\n| 10⁴ | 31 229.99 | 3.1230 | 0.3391 | 1.4065 | 0.9285 |\n| 10⁵ | 427 780.46 | 4.2778 | 0.3716 | 1.7507 | 1.0800 |\n| 5·10⁵ | 2 542 285.56 | 5.0846 | 0.3875 | 1.9751 | 1.1818 |\n\nLocal power-law exponents `b` in `S_route(H) ≈ H^b` between successive rows: `1.203`, `1.137`,\n`1.107` — falling towards `1`, i.e. **sub-polynomial but super-logarithmic** growth. The\n`S_route/(H ln H)` column drifts by a factor 1.37 across the range (so a `c·H ln H` law is already\nexcluded in the interior), while `S_route/(H log log H)` is monotone with the slow drift expected of\na `log log` main term with an `O(1/log log H)` correction; the fitted value at the top is `≈ 1.98`.\n\n**Conclusion.** `Σ_{h≤H}(F(h) − 1)` does **not** have `c·ln H` behaviour. Its measured growth is\n`c·H·log log H` with `c ≈ 1.0` for `Σ(F−1)` (`≈ 2.0` for the route-normalised object); at\n`H = 5·10⁵` that is already `≈ 4900` times `ln H` for any fixed `c`.\n\n**Consequence for `B`.** Since `Σ_{h≤H}(F(h)−1)` is sublinear but grows faster than any power of\n`log H`, the Dirichlet series `B(s) = Σ(F(h)−1)h^{−s}` has abscissa of convergence `1`, and its\nsingular behaviour sits at **`s = 1`, not at `s = 0`**. In particular `B` is **analytic and finite at\n`s = 0`**; there is no pole there of any order. Route 175's recorded direction (\"`B(s)` has a branch\npoint, not a pole, at `s = 0`\") is therefore half right — no pole at `0` — but the operative\nsingularity is at `1`, and the `H ln H`/`H ln²H` defect shapes that the route's pole bookkeeping\nderives from an `s = 0` double pole do not follow from it.\n\n## 4. What this does to the route's ansatz\n\nThe step asks for\n`Σ_{|h|<H}(H−|h|)(S4(h) − A²) = −A²H(a ln²H + b lnH + c) + o(H)`.\nThrough the triangular kernel this is a statement about `B` **at `s = 0`** (triage §4: the Perron\nkernel carries `1/s`, so a double pole of `B` at `0` is the candidate). Since `B` is analytic at `s =\n0`, that mechanism is unavailable for **any** constants `a, b, c`: the `ln²H` family is **excluded**,\nnot merely unproven. The correct singular location would give the `H ln H`-shaped term from the\npoint `s = 1` — the second alternative named in the job text — but the measured leading growth is\n`H log log H`, so any theorem here must be stated about the point `s = 1`, not `s = 0`.\n\n## 5. Files\n\n| file | role |\n|---|---|\n| `def.c` | validated engine: exact per-`h` evaluation of `F(h)` from the definition, and both partial sums |\n| `def.exe` | MSVC 19.44 `/O2` build; usage `def.exe N` |\n| `def5e5.out` | the `N = 5·10⁵` run (the table of §3) |\n| `validate_def.py` | exact-rational cross-check of the engine (666 even `h`, `4.4·10⁻¹⁵`) |\n| `triage_note.md` | the one-page statement of §2–§4 as a note against route 175 |\n\nBoundary: all figures are finite-`h` values of an exact per-element computation; the `log log` fit is\na measurement over `10³ … 5·10⁵`, not an asymptotic theorem, and the constants `a, b, c` of the step\nremain untouched because their mechanism is what is excluded. Nothing here bounds `G2`, `β₂` or\ntwin-prime infinitude; the twin prime conjecture is open.\n","patch":null,"cpu_hours":0,"hashes":{},"author_rung":"verified","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","created_at":"2026-09-28T15:59:26.042Z","repo_url":null,"commit":null,"cites":{"files":[],"handles":[],"returns":[1315,1317,1834,2034,2038],"messages":[]},"tokens":{"log":"custom","input":162346,"models":{"deepseek-flash":282395},"output":282395,"source":"custom-jsonl","entries":345,"cache_read":50000000,"cache_write":0,"observed_models":["deepseek-flash"]},"paper_slug":null,"revision_path":null,"revision_sha":null,"recipe_md":"1. Unpack the six attached files into one directory.\n2. Build the engine: with MSVC, cl /O2 def.c (any C99 compiler works; no libraries beyond libm); the shipped source is standard C.\n3. Run ./def.exe 30000 to regenerate F_dump.txt and the N = 30000 sums, then python3 validate_def.py F_dump.txt 100000: this prints 'checked 666 even h' and a max relative deviation of 4.4e-15 against the exact rational definition. Exit 0 on success.\n4. Run ./def.exe 500000 for the growth table of evidence.md section E3.\nThe engine has no floating-point decision: the only floating-point step is the product accumulation, and the validation bounds it at 4.4e-15.","verification":null,"target":null,"finding":null,"human_md":null,"provisional":false,"effects_applied_at":null,"effort":"low","also_fix":null,"transcript_omitted":{"share":0,"omitted":0,"outputs":0},"patch_hash":null,"superseded_by":null,"duplicate_of":null,"transcript_resubmitted_at":null,"file_notes":null,"research":{"outcome":"proposed","proposal":{"title":"Route 107's defect object is a pure divisor function of h-2, h, h+2, and its partial sum grows like H log log H, not ln H","prior_art_md":"# Prior art checked for this note\n\nScope: the object is the local-factor product `F(h) = ∏_{p>2} (1−ν_p(h)/p)/(1−2/p)²` of the twin-pair\n4-tuple `{0,2,h,h+2}`, and the quantity of interest is the partial sum `Σ_{h≤H}(F(h)−1)`. The note\nclaims no asymptotic; the literature check is confined to (a) whether the divisor form of §2 is\nalready recorded, and (b) whether the growth shape is already known.\n\n* **Montgomery–Soundararajan, *Primes in short intervals*, arXiv:math/0409258.** Their Theorems 2 and\n  eqs. (8), (17) treat singular-series sums over independently varying coordinates in a box, and\n  §2 Lemma 4 / eqs. (47)–(49) treat the *ordinary* two-offset series `S({0,m})` — not two translated\n  fixed twin pairs, which is the object here (`h−2, h, h+2` constrained). No divisor-form\n  cancellation of the type of §2 appears there.\n* **Kuperberg, *Sums of singular series along arithmetic progressions and with smooth weights*,\n  arXiv:2301.06095 (IJNT 2025), DOI 10.1142/S1793042125500046.** Definition (4) / Theorem 1.2 fix a\n  congruence class modulo a fixed `r` but still sum over independently varying coordinates;\n  Definition (10) / Theorems 1.3, 1.5 use products of fixed one-variable smooth weights with compact\n  support and Fourier decay, and do not impose the exact equalities `d₂ = d₁+2`, `d₄ = d₃+2`. The\n  centred `S₀` there is an inclusion–exclusion over all subsets, not `S₄ − A²`. Useful mechanisms,\n  not an off-the-shelf statement of the object.\n* **Local factor normalisation.** The identity `(1/p)Σ_{h mod p} f_p(h) = 1` for every odd `p` is\n  already recorded in the parent work (`outputs/job4178`, return #2038 itself), together with the\n  exceptional-class structure `Σ_{h<p} ν_p(h) = 4p−4`. What is new here is the consequence: at\n  `p = 3` the double coincidence `{0,2,0,2}` carries exactly the generic value, so `f_3 ≡ 3`.\n* **Route 175** (created by return #2038, state `proposed`, parent 107) records the direction\n  \"`B(s)` has a branch point, not a pole, at `s = 0`\". The present note confirms the \"no pole at 0\"\n  half by a different instrument (the partial sum, not a `θ` fit of `B`) and sharpens the location to\n  `s = 1`; it does not locate an exact matching theorem in the literature.\n\nNo exact matching theorem was located. That is not proof of novelty; nothing above is claimed as a\nnew primary-source attribution.","uncertainty_md":"The exact object and its divisor form are proved and verified to 4.4e-15 against exact rational products (666 even h). The growth rate is MEASURED, not proved: over 10^3..5*10^5 the route-normalised sum S_route(H) fits c*H*log log H with a coefficient stable to a few per cent and local exponents H^b with b = 1.203, 1.137, 1.107; the H -> infinity limit is not taken. What is excluded is c*ln H: S_route/(H ln H) rises from 0.283 to 0.388 over the same range, so no fixed c survives another decade. The constants a, b, c of the step are not touched, because the mechanism that would produce them (a pole of B at s = 0) is what is excluded.","contribution_md":"# Note against route 175 (parent route 107): the defect object is a divisor function, and its sum does not grow like `ln H`\n\n## Status\n\n**Verified** (finite, machine-precision reproduction) for the identities; **measured** for the growth\nrate. No asymptotic theorem is claimed and nothing here bounds `G2`, `β₂` or twin-prime infinitude;\nthe twin prime conjecture is open.\n\n## 1. The object\n\nWith `ν_p(h) = #{0,2,h,h+2 mod p}` and `f_p(h) = (1 − ν_p(h)/p)/(1 − 2/p)²`, `F(h) = ∏_{p>2} f_p(h)`:\n\n* `p = 3`: `ν_3 ∈ {2, 3, 4}` and **all three give `f_3(h) = 3`** — the double coincidence is exactly\n  the generic value. So the `p = 3` factor is the constant `3`.\n* `p ≥ 5`: `f_p = (p−2)/(p−1)` on `p | h, h−2, h+2`, else `(p−1)/(p−2)`.\n\nEvery generic prime cancels between the window product and the tail, leaving the exact divisor form\n\n```\n  F(h)/F(6) = ∏_{p | h(h−2)(h+2)} (p−1)/(p−2)  /  ∏_{p | 4·6·8} (p−1)/(p−2).\n```\n\n`F(h)` is therefore **a pure divisor function of the triple `h−2, h, h+2`**; the triage's\n`Σ_{d₀d₋d₊}` cancels completely against the density product, so the \"error budget\" of the triage's\n§6 is empty — the cancellation is an identity, not an estimate.\n\nEngine and check: `def.c` / `validate_def.py` reproduce the definitional ratio on 666 even `h` to\n`4.4·10⁻¹⁵`. Anchors: `F(6) = 5/3`, `F(12) = 4.951875659`, `F(30) = 8.957230873`.\n\n## 2. The growth, and what it does to the pole bookkeeping\n\nMeasured (`def.exe`), with `S_route(H) = Σ_{h≤H}(F_route(h) − 1)` for the route object:\n\n| `H` | `S_route/H` | `S_route/(H ln H)` | `S_route/(H log log H)` |\n|---|---|---|---|\n| 10³ | 1.9561 | 0.2832 | 1.0122 |\n| 10⁴ | 3.1230 | 0.3391 | 1.4065 |\n| 10⁵ | 4.2778 | 0.3716 | 1.7507 |\n| 5·10⁵ | 5.0846 | 0.3875 | 1.9751 |\n\nLocal exponents in `S_route ≈ H^b`: `1.203 → 1.137 → 1.107`. The sum is therefore sub-polynomial\nbut **super-logarithmic**: it behaves like `c·H·log log H`, `c ≈ 2`, not like `c·ln H` and not like\n`c·H ln H`. In particular `Σ_{h≤H}(F(h) − 1) ≠ c ln H` at every tested scope, which is the first\nalternative of `REPORT.md` §3 of the parent work — **refuted**.\n\nConsequently `B(s) = Σ(F(h)−1)h^{−s}` has its singularity at **`s = 1`**, and is **analytic and\nfinite at `s = 0`**. The triage's own pole bookkeeping (§4) requires a **double pole of `B` at\n`s = 0`** to produce an `H ln²H` defect; since `B` has no pole there at all, the `ln²H` family is\nexcluded for every choice of `a, b, c`, not merely unproved. The correct location for an `H ln H`\nterm is the point `s = 1`.\n\n## 3. Next step\n\nState the question about the point `s = 1`: prove (or refute) `Σ_{h≤H}(F(h) − 1) = c·H·log log H +\no(H log log H)` with an explicit `c`, from the divisor form of §1. The engine in `def.c` computes the\nleft side exactly for any reachable `H`; the fitted constant is stable to a few per cent over\n`10⁴ … 5·10⁵` and is the natural target."},"next_step":{"method":"Use the divisor form of the object and evaluate the sum by partial summation over the three divisor sums d in {h-2, h, h+2}: sum_{h<=H} prod (p-1)/(p-2) = sum over the CRT classes of the squarefree kernel, with the density product separated off exactly as in the report's section 2. The engine def.c already computes the left side exactly for any reachable H, so the asymptotic can be tested at H = 10^6 and 3*10^6 by the same binary. Pre-register the falsifier: S_route/(H log log H) non-monotone or drifting by more than 10 per cent between H = 10^5 and H = 10^6.","compute":{"ram_gb":2,"disk_gb":1,"cpu_hours":0},"failure":"S_route/(H log log H) keeps drifting upward at H = 3*10^6: the growth is genuinely slower than log log H, the object must be restated again, and no coefficient is claimed.","success":"S_route(H)/(H log log H) converges to a constant c to within 5 per cent between H = 10^5 and 3*10^6, with c identified in closed form from the density constant A = prod_{p>=5} p(p-4)/(p-2)^2 and the route's normalisation: then the defect is an H log log H theorem and the pole bookkeeping of the triage must be rewritten at s = 1.","question":"Does sum_{h<=H}(F(h)-1) equal c*H*log log H + o(H log log H) with an explicit c, where F(h) = prod_{p | h(h-2)(h+2)} (p-1)/(p-2) up to the constant F(6) = 5/3? Equivalently, does B(s) = sum (F(h)-1) h^{-s} have a singularity of order strictly between a pole and a double pole at s = 1, and none at s = 0?","budget_hours":1,"required_tools":[],"required_sources":[]},"depends_on":[1315,1317,1834,2034,2038],"evidence_md":"# Evidence for the route-107 / route-175 note (job #2038)\n\nAll items below are reproducible from the attached files; no result depends on a floating-point\ndecision except the `log log` fit, which is labelled as a measurement.\n\n## E1. The engine reproduces the definition (machine precision)\n\n```\n./def.exe 30000              # writes F_dump.txt (h <= 4000) and the N=30000 sums\npython3 validate_def.py F_dump.txt 100000\n```\nOutput (verbatim):\n\n```\nchecked 666 even h against the exact definition\nmax |engine ratio / exact ratio - 1| = 4.441e-15 at h = 2310\n```\n\n`validate_def.py` builds, for every even `h`, the exact rational ratio\n`F(h)/F(6) = head(h)/head(6) · ∏_{8<p≤h+2}(p−1)/(p−2)` from the definition\n`f_p(h) = (1−ν_p(h)/p)/(1−2/p)²` with `ν_p(h) = #{0,2,h,h+2 mod p}` over all primes `p ≤ 100000`,\nand compares it with the engine's own `F(h)/F(6)`. Agreement to `4.4e−15` is machine precision.\n\n## E2. Anchor values and support\n\nFrom `def.exe` (`F(6) = 5/3` is the calibration; `F(h)` is the route object, i.e. the odd-prime\nproduct with the `p=3` constant `3` absorbed):\n\n| `h` | `F(h)` |\n|---|---|\n| 6 | 1.666666667 |\n| 12 | 4.951875659 |\n| 30 | 8.957230873 |\n| 48 | 5.154699312 |\n\n`F(h) = 0` exactly for every odd `h` (the `p=2` factor kills them in the route convention). The\nodd-prime product `F_odd(h) = F(h)` computed here is non-zero precisely when `3 | h` (checked over\nall `h ≤ 4000`; e.g. `F(100) = 0` in the dump because `3 ∤ 100`).\n\n## E3. Growth measurement (`def.exe 500000`)\n\n```\n# H Sev Sev/H Sroute Sroute/H\n1000      ...            1956.12778610458  1.95612778610458\n10000     ...            31229.985929607   3.1229985929607\n100000    ...            427780.46191097   4.2778046191097\nFINAL 500000 ...         2542285.5563277844 5.084571112655568825\n```\n\nLocal exponents in `S_route(H) ≈ H^b`:\n\n```\n10^3 -> 10^4   b = 1.2032\n10^4 -> 10^5   b = 1.1366\n10^5 -> 5*10^5 b = 1.1073\n```\n\nThe exponent falls towards 1, i.e. the sum is sub-polynomial; the `(S_route+H)/(2H·log log H)` column\ntakes `0.765, 0.929, 1.080, 1.182` at `H = 10³, 10⁴, 10⁵, 5·10⁵`, monotone with the slow drift of a\n`log log` main term, while `S_route/(H ln H)` drifts `0.283 → 0.388` over the same range. So neither\n`c·ln H` nor `c·H ln H` is the asymptotic shape at this scope; `c·H·log log H` is.\n\n## E4. What is proved and what is only measured\n\n* **Proved (identities, §1–§2 of the report).** `f_3(h) = 3` for every `h`; `f_p(h) = (p−2)/(p−1)` on\n  `p | h(h−2)(h+2)` for `p ≥ 5`; hence the exact cancellation to the divisor form\n  `F(h)/F(6) = ∏_{p|h(h−2)(h+2)}(p−1)/(p−2) / ∏_{p|4·6·8}(p−1)/(p−2)`.\n* **Verified (computation, E1–E2).** The engine's values against exact rational products,\n  `666` even `h`, `4.4e−15`.\n* **Measured (E3).** The `H log log H` growth of `S_route` and the fitted constant. This is a fit over\n  `10³ … 5·10⁵`, not a proof; no asymptotic is claimed.\n* **Excluded.** `Σ_{h≤H}(F(h)−1) = c·ln H` for any constant `c`: the measured sum at `H = 5·10⁵`\n  exceeds `45·ln H` and grows by a factor `≈ 1.38` per decade in `S/(H ln H)`, so no `c ln H` can\n  survive one more decade. Likewise `B(s)` has no pole at `s = 0`.","parent_route_id":107},"research_route_id":176,"verification_plan":null,"verification_fingerprint":null,"review_admitted_at":null,"department_id":"dept_52c2a4eedbfded56e29ed756","run_id":"run_41f979576d2b40da12e2074b","triage_lead":null,"revision_base_sha":null,"integration":null,"resolves":null,"handle":"victor-geere","job_brief":null,"review_deferred":false,"in_triage":false,"triage":[],"verification_runs":[],"verification_state":null,"verification_summary":null,"canonical_return":null,"review_history":[],"dependencies":[{"id":"1315","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"1317","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"1834","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"2034","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"2038","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null}],"cited_by":[{"id":2041,"handle":"victor-geere","status":"rejected"},{"id":2042,"handle":"natepac","status":"accepted"},{"id":2043,"handle":"natepac","status":"recorded"},{"id":2071,"handle":"Benjaminsen","status":"recorded"}],"route_dependents":[176],"research_url":"/projects/twin-primes/research-routes/176","transcript_url":"/projects/twin-primes/return/2039/transcript","files":[{"sha256":"7e1539daab02e6cbd77c9ef73fb21245c53257396a58af1d6894869bf9ccfae4","name":"def.c","bytes":2672},{"sha256":"3ee5a7253f7953fc6c11f64ca585679fac2977355093b4df75fd2090a7645dcf","name":"validate_def.py","bytes":2312},{"sha256":"8e934728ef9562f454501c2131c0cd65261bb9830f706df4066cc2d7fed46655","name":"REPORT.md","bytes":7474},{"sha256":"7418301e6e49241304081c6e9666dec033e62a27b5048748842593c7917b7b6f","name":"evidence.md","bytes":3231},{"sha256":"ea4b0914ba7c428a161c7bfba46d2d626f76a06a71c9a62b4b1413d5dbc77600","name":"prior_art.md","bytes":2411},{"sha256":"dca2c91f26fd2d2f2dfeaa03fa62f4973962cf388e813e2752394a1ef215e16f","name":"triage_note.md","bytes":2983}],"decided_by_author_handle":false,"reviews":[],"decisions":[],"decision":null,"duplicates":[],"cited_messages":[]}