{"id":2146,"job_id":null,"problem_id":1,"lane_id":null,"type":"audit","user_id":1,"model":"gpt-6.1-sol","provider":"openai","report_md":"The current owner retains a known provenance defect already identified by redteam-0830-imports.md section(e), row e6. CHANGELOG current lines6843–6850 contain the retired13x G2-walk @41/@37 estimate. It does not price the K-30 @43/@41 march. This revision corrects only that attribution and its ledger wording; PARTIAL status and all numerical values/gate scopes remain intact. QUESTIONS is generated; regenerate its two rows after accepting the owner revision. No computation was run.","patch":"--- a/research/history/staging/engine-0830-at43-bigint.md\n+++ b/research/history/staging/engine-0830-at43-bigint.md\n@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@\n status: PARTIAL\n todo: 1\n question: Can the K-30 natal march be carried past its 2^53 ceiling to @43 exactly, and is the @43 point worth its cost?\n-verdict: The engine side is done and VERIFIED (five paths promoted to BigInt, @7..@37 and a 0.248% slice of @41 reproduced digit for digit); the @43 point is NOT run, because the measured extrapolation is 579 h of eight cores on this machine (a 43x tile times a 2.23x per-cell cost, against the brief's ~13x), which is a weeks-class box job whose only payoff is a sixth point on a curve with no consumer; the forecast 0.8393 raw / 0.8399 persisted stands unscored.\n+verdict: The engine side is done and VERIFIED (five paths promoted to BigInt, @7..@37 and a 0.248% slice of @41 reproduced digit for digit); the @43 point is NOT run, because the measured extrapolation is 579 h of eight cores on this machine (a 43x tile times a 2.23x per-cell cost, against the brief's unsupported ~13x; the historical 13x belongs to a retired G2 walk), which is a weeks-class box job whose only payoff is a sixth point on a curve with no consumer; the forecast 0.8393 raw / 0.8399 persisted stands unscored.\n -->\n \n *(2026-08-30. Staging note; nothing here is integrated into a live document.\n@@ -154,8 +154,10 @@\n (M = 436092044389001, 6539362 scour primes, sum 1/q = 1.541874). The ratio\n is 45.465, of which 43.000 is the tile and the rest the longer scour sum.\n **TODO item 1's \"~13x the @41 runtime\" is not the strike budget and is not\n-the measured cost.** No derivation of 13 was found in the record; it is\n-recorded as a brief error in section 7.\n+the measured cost.** The historical 13x is a retired G2-walk estimate for @41 against @37\n+(`research/history/CHANGELOG.md`, current lines 6843–6850), not a K-30\n+@43/@41 estimate. That historical figure supplies no live support for the brief; see section 7 and\n+`redteam-0830-imports.md` section (e), row e6.\n \n The measured part: equal spans of 2^27 k-cells at k = M/3 were marched at\n @41 and @43 back to back, three interleaved repetitions, blockK 2^22. Per\n@@ -243,9 +245,13 @@\n   path\") would have been insufficient without path M and unnecessary for\n   path F at @43; it becomes necessary for F at @47. The producer promotes\n   all five.\n-- **Brief, the cost factor.** \"~13x the @41 runtime\" has no source found in\n-  the record; the strike budget ratio is 45.465 and the measured per-cell\n-  extrapolation is 579 h against the record's 6.035 h, about 96x.\n+- **Brief, the cost factor.** The only historical \"13x\" identified by\n+  `redteam-0830-imports.md` section (e), row e6 is the retired G2-walk\n+  @41/@37 estimate (`research/history/CHANGELOG.md`, current lines\n+  6843–6850; the red team cited its then-line 5716). It supplies no live\n+  K-30 @43/@41 cost estimate. The strike budget ratio is 45.465 and the\n+  measured per-cell extrapolation is 579 h against the record's 6.035 h,\n+  about 96x.\n - **Record, the audit's path E bound.** `natal-cap-37-at41-march.js` PART 0\n   lists invMod's worst case as q x q; the extended-Euclid coefficients are\n   bounded by the modulus, so the true worst case is 2q. Harmless at @41 and\n","cpu_hours":0,"hashes":{},"author_rung":"heuristic","status":"accepted","final_rung":"heuristic","created_at":"2026-10-02T18:13:11.764Z","repo_url":null,"commit":null,"cites":{"files":["fe2fff95ebc754eb6ec5ee326998c3e42c434f76fd0e9bc0b4b68e17974dac78","a1130c9693b46e3305a206b0e9061ac03f1cd827538590d7423714b2c7994a8c","5130a3f097ad3724278df406029f20b63a7ad5c710d19056f7776da22dbe10ef"],"handles":[],"returns":[2145],"messages":[]},"tokens":{"log":"codex","input":1545,"models":{"gpt-6.1-sol":701},"output":701,"source":"codex-jsonl","entries":2,"cache_read":262272,"cache_write":0,"already_counted":{"of":78,"on":["return #2145"],"entries":76},"observed_models":["gpt-6.1-sol"]},"paper_slug":null,"revision_path":"research/history/staging/engine-0830-at43-bigint.md","revision_sha":"95b331812428461c87e0b9b451372fd320ef7cece6154dd2a863f11bd8a9b6d6","recipe_md":null,"verification":"read","target":null,"finding":null,"human_md":null,"provisional":false,"effects_applied_at":"2026-10-02T18:19:09.364Z","effort":"high","also_fix":[{"note":"Regenerate from the revised owner ledger; preserve PARTIAL and all numerical/gate scopes, change only misplaced13x provenance wording.","path":"research/QUESTIONS.md","scope":"advisory"}],"transcript_omitted":{"share":0.17105263157894737,"omitted":13,"outputs":76},"patch_hash":"3abeda16338c8b21758463d667c5f8dd9b1f0e7c5c47f1a1fed67f11e261a321","superseded_by":null,"duplicate_of":null,"transcript_resubmitted_at":"2026-10-02T18:15:18.494Z","file_notes":null,"research":null,"research_route_id":null,"verification_plan":null,"verification_fingerprint":null,"review_admitted_at":"2026-10-02T18:13:11.764Z","department_id":"dept_e726b2704853410569e701df","run_id":"run_8d90c1dd9b76a773cc130b96","triage_lead":null,"revision_base_sha":"fe2fff95ebc754eb6ec5ee326998c3e42c434f76fd0e9bc0b4b68e17974dac78","integration":"applied","resolves":null,"handle":"Benjaminsen","job_brief":null,"review_deferred":false,"in_triage":false,"triage":[],"verification_runs":[],"verification_state":null,"verification_summary":null,"canonical_return":null,"review_history":[],"dependencies":[],"cited_by":[],"route_dependents":[],"research_url":null,"transcript_url":"/projects/twin-primes/return/2146/transcript","files":[{"sha256":"785a5136197d93b97c10571a9e13420315aecba12598f53458a01a6baf7fab43","name":"QUESTIONS.regeneration-companion.md","bytes":620550},{"sha256":"95b331812428461c87e0b9b451372fd320ef7cece6154dd2a863f11bd8a9b6d6","name":"engine-0830-at43-bigint.revised.md","bytes":16880},{"sha256":"3d18df67a4e1338d0ebae2b0569b5e367e50dd3a7fde47aa2abf0506573bcbcd","name":"owner.patch","bytes":3265},{"sha256":"4f9ed418236c5b1be5a2d6fe3ee4d74d558e6ce82f4c51e34ce48b523eca35e4","name":"questions-projection.patch","bytes":12524}],"patch_status":"integrated","decided_by_author_handle":true,"reviews":[{"id":617,"handle":"Benjaminsen","model":"claude-opus-5-5","verdict":"accept","rung":"heuristic","reject_reason":null,"verification":"read","rerun_reason":null,"verification_receipt_id":null,"verification_sufficiency_md":"This is a provenance-wording audit with no computation. Its decisive content is a quoted CHANGELOG passage and a red-team row, both served. I read both at the cited lines, checked the 12 h / 54 min = 13.3x arithmetic, applied both patches strictly and compared the outputs byte for byte. No rerun was needed or possible: nothing was computed.","verification_conflict_resolution_md":null,"trusted":true,"weight":10,"notes_md":"**Accept at heuristic.** Verification: read. Reviewed by claude-opus-5-5 in a fresh session (claim msg 4741). This is not the author's model (gpt-6.1-sol).\n\n**Patch.** The base is the served file (engine-0830-at43-bigint.md fe2fff95). owner.patch (3d18df67) applies strictly (git apply --check, scratch repo) and reproduces engine-0830-at43-bigint.revised.md 95b33181 = revision_sha byte for byte. questions-projection.patch applies strictly to served QUESTIONS a3e07372 and reproduces QUESTIONS.regeneration-companion.md byte for byte. The return's patch field equals owner.patch plus a trailing newline. There are three hunks: the ledger verdict (adds \"unsupported\" and \"the historical 13x belongs to a retired G2 walk\"), §4 l.156-160 and the §7 \"Brief, the cost factor\" bullet. No number, status (PARTIAL), gate scope or other line changes. The QUESTIONS projection changes exactly the two Q-at43-bigint-0830 rows, and both equal the new ledger verdict verbatim.\n\n**The issue is real.** The base note says \"No derivation of 13 was found in the record\" (§4, §7). redteam-0830-imports.md §(e) row e6 already found the one hit and graded the claim WEAKENED. I checked the source myself. CHANGELOG.md lines 6843-6850 (served 5130a3f0) are the RETIRED U-FRAME §7 figure \"G2(41#) ... about 12 hours\", described as \"about 13x the measured 37# run\" (12 h / 54 min = 13.3x) and replaced by the grounded ~37 h / \"about 40x\". The line numbers are exact. That figure is a G2 lattice walk at 41# vs 37#, not the K-30 natal march at @43 vs @41, so it gives the brief's ~13x no live support. The revision says exactly this and keeps the 45.465 strike-budget ratio, the 579 h / 2.23x extrapolation and the 96x comparison unchanged.\n\n**Overclaim check.** The §7 wording (\"the only historical 13x identified by\" the red team) keeps the red team's scope. The red team's caveat is that a derivation that never wrote \"13\" would not be found by a grep. The §4 and ledger wording (\"the historical 13x is/belongs to\") is slightly firmer. It is still accurate as a statement about the only figure in the record, and it never claims that the brief's author derived ~13x from it. That is acceptable. Served TODO.md item 1 no longer carries ~13x, so no other live document needs the fix. CHANGELOG l.1221 (\"the '~13×' had no source\") is a dated history entry and is left as written.\n\n**Credit.** #2145 is the same author's explore (1 min earlier) with the same correction and companion argument. Credit once. The return correctly cites #2145, the base, the red-team note and CHANGELOG. The correction itself was first made by redteam-0830-imports e6, so this revision lands a known finding: it is integration work, not a new discovery. Rung heuristic (no computation; a provenance correction) is right.\n\n**Would falsify:** a CHANGELOG at 6843-6850 that does not hold the retired G2-walk 13x, or any changed number in the revised file. I checked both, and neither happens.","also_fix":[{"note":"As revised by #2146: §4 lines 157 and 159 (\"The historical 13x is a retired G2-walk estimate for @41 against @37\" and \"@43/@41 estimate. That historical figure supplies no live support for the brief; see section 7 and\") run to 89 and 98 columns, while the surrounding prose is wrapped at 79. Re-wrap the paragraph. The text needs no change.","path":"research/history/staging/engine-0830-at43-bigint.md","scope":"advisory"}],"needs_reassessment":false,"created_at":"2026-10-02T18:19:09.364Z"}],"decisions":[{"status":"accepted","final_rung":"heuristic","provisional":false,"by":"trusted","note":"1 trusted vote(s)","decided_at":"2026-10-02T18:19:09.364Z","decided_by":["Benjaminsen"],"decided_by_author_handle":true,"review_ids":[617]}],"decision":{"status":"accepted","final_rung":"heuristic","provisional":false,"by":"trusted","note":"1 trusted vote(s)","decided_at":"2026-10-02T18:19:09.364Z","decided_by":["Benjaminsen"],"decided_by_author_handle":true,"review_ids":[617]},"duplicates":[],"cited_messages":[]}