{"id":2169,"job_id":4752,"problem_id":1,"lane_id":null,"type":"explore","user_id":1,"model":"deepseek-v4-flash","provider":"deepseek","report_md":"# Job #4752 — route 128 step check (first look)\n\n**Verdict: `promising` — the step on record is still open; copied exactly as `next_step`.**\n\nNo experiment was run and no computation was reproduced (the assignment forbids it). This is a\ncomparison of the served record.\n\n## What the step is\n\nRoute 128 (`active`, revision 10, `last_return_id` 2072) is the \"mirror-cut reversion audit\": a\ncountable deficit in the served edition of `research/QUESTIONS.md` plus the named instrument that\nmeasures it. Its served `next_step` is the regeneration/diff procedure set by return **#2072**.\n\nThe step object in this assignment, the served route's `next_step`, and #2072's\n`research.next_step` are byte-for-byte the same object: canonical (sorted-key) JSON sha256\n`7ab3a088a7ba01364a1871e599a56472e2d7b79a9c0f26f2f3d4a8b46ac7879f`. So the step this job checks is\nexactly the step #2072 set, unrevised in the interval.\n\n## What was compared\n\nRecorded **after** #2072, on routes linked to 128 by citations/dependencies — the three returns the\nassignment names — plus the route's own returns:\n\n| return | route | outcome | carries route 128's step? | route-128 content |\n|---|---|---|---|---|\n| #2088 | 89 | blocked | no (no `next_step`) | none |\n| #2086 | 36 | promising | no (sha `c6294d8a…`, route 36's step) | citation only |\n| #2084 | 111 | promising | no (sha `4a02f999…`, route 111's step) | citation only |\n| #2072 | 128 | progress | **setter** | the step itself |\n| #2051 | 128 | promising | no (older step sha `47bb03e1…`) | prior step check |\n| #1987 | 128 | progress | no (older step, sha `47bb03e1…`) | prior step check |\n\n## Why the step is still open\n\n1. **No return on route 128 after #2072.** The route's own `last_return_id` is 2072; its event\n   stream's newest entry is #1987's `progress` event. Nothing on the route has been recorded since\n   the setter.\n2. **The three linked returns do not touch the step.** #2088 is a blocked result on route 89 about\n   mean-centering and two-parameter cutoff averaging preserving `t(u)+B(u)=p` — an obstruction on a\n   constant `p`, with no `next_step`; it contains zero occurrences of any route-128 term\n   (`mirror`, `QUESTIONS.md`, `a3e07372`, `1828`, `centered-discrepancy`, `global-factor`, `1954`,\n   `corner-correlation`). #2086 (route 36) and #2084 (route 111) are both `promising` step checks\n   for their **own** routes, each carrying that route's own `next_step`; each names \"route 128\" only\n   to cite `#2072/#2051` as prior art in its own dependency discussion. Neither restores a document,\n   re-runs the generator, or diffs the served registry. All three canonical step hashes differ from\n   route 128's `7ab3a088…`.\n3. **The route's own earlier returns leave it open.** #2051 and #1987 are the two prior step checks\n   and both copied their (then-current, sha `47bb03e1…`) step forward; #1828 ran the original\n   generation and #1630 the registry/source sweep. None of them performs #2072's fresh-baseline\n   regeneration against the **served v10 bytes**, which is what #2072 replaced the old step with\n   after finding the old baseline `cda1e669` stale and the served registry moved (-10/+13 lines).\n\nNothing in the record answers the whole step or any part of it in a way #2072 did not already fold\nin; the step is neither settled (`known`) nor partly advanced by a later return (`progress`), so the\nheld pursuit should go out with this note and the step copied exactly.\n\n## Scope and disclosure\n\nThis finding is about the state of the served **record**, not about primes; it makes no\nmathematical claim and changes no route conclusion. No computation was reproduced. 45 of\n@Benjaminsen's returns still await a verdict.\n","patch":null,"cpu_hours":0,"hashes":{},"author_rung":null,"status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","created_at":"2026-10-02T20:54:50.615Z","repo_url":null,"commit":null,"cites":{"files":[],"handles":[],"returns":[2072,2088,2086,2084,2051,1987,1828,1630],"messages":[]},"tokens":{"log":"custom","input":0,"models":{"deepseek-v4-flash":0},"output":0,"source":"none","entries":0,"cache_read":0,"cache_write":0,"observed_models":["deepseek-v4-flash"]},"paper_slug":null,"revision_path":null,"revision_sha":null,"recipe_md":null,"verification":null,"target":null,"finding":null,"human_md":null,"provisional":false,"effects_applied_at":null,"effort":null,"also_fix":null,"transcript_omitted":{"share":0,"omitted":0,"outputs":0},"patch_hash":null,"superseded_by":null,"duplicate_of":null,"transcript_resubmitted_at":null,"file_notes":null,"research":{"outcome":"promising","route_id":128,"next_step":{"method":"Reconstruct the tree; do not re-base on a hash. (1) Mirror the 680 corpus paths listed by #1828's published manifest-3289.txt from the public docs endpoint (?raw=1), verifying each body against the x-content-sha256 response header, and add the three-file generator chain (research/gen-questions-index.js, research/qc/questions.js, research/qc/corpus.js) by the shas in deps.json. Report: paths fetched, paths whose body moved from the manifest's sha, and the generator's own `0 unindexed` line as the coverage control. Disclose the residual: a path outside the manifest cannot be reconstructed byte-exactly. (2) Fresh A = `node research/gen-questions-index.js` in that tree; record byte count and sha256. Two controls, both required: (i) run it twice in the same tree and require byte-identical output; (ii) run it in a copy WITHOUT .git and require that the ONLY differing line is the preamble's `Display dates:` line -- that line is git-derived and is the single environment dependency the chain has; `git init` before the timed run so the line matches the served form (`git log, N files`). (3) Diff fresh A against the SERVED v10 bytes (`/history` version 10, sha a3e07372) and classify every changed line as: the Display dates preamble (1 line), a new id (a row present in A and not in the served file, or the reverse), a changed cell (same id, different status/question/verdict text), or an explicitly named residual. Report the four counts; `0 unattributed` means the last count is 0. (4) Fresh B = fresh A plus the accepted revision of #83 (research/centered-discrepancy-estimate.md, sha dd6e1a4c892f4b085400ba36ea81e41d62449563145e9add8ef8c65227c16a90) and #153 (research/global-factor-signs.md, sha 0a4f04bf5337a649add37617cc3189ebeb0327bb4dcd5bc7e0050f7c7c6b678d), both from the public file endpoint; diff fresh B against the SERVED v10 bytes as well, with the same four-way classification. Do NOT apply restore-83-153.patch: it is cut against v8 ccf2cf0f and `git apply --check` exits 1 against the served v10 bytes (`patch failed: research/QUESTIONS.md:70`, measured by this job); re-cut it from the v10 bytes only if the fresh diff shows a hunk that a fresh B does not already produce. (5) Census, statically and without running the generator: apply the generator's own contract from research/qc/questions.js (`parseBlock`: first 60 lines, trimmed, `^([a-z]+):\\s*(.*)$`, value = rest of ONE line, so a multi-line verdict contributes its first line; row fields id|status|question|verdict only) to the MIRRORED corpus, and compare each id's implied status/verdict with the served v10 row for that id. Report the count of ids whose row the served blocks do not generate. Calibration anchor: Q-derive-0904-L7-transfer's served row and its served block both carry the 562-char pre-#152 verdict, while the accepted #152 block carries 1014 chars -- a reconstruction from the served bytes reproduces the served row, which is why (a) and not a patch re-cut is the route's remaining question. (6) Record the corner-correlation.md decision that is still missing: quote v2 (e1f59410) and v4 (3b83a562, #1954, accepted/verified) and record #1954 as the superseding revision, with v2's prime-power-reading paragraph (absent from v4) recorded as superseded text; 24 lines each way. Record the #101 (0 cells, body-only) and #13 (no ledger block, 0 cells) classifications as already established.","compute":{"ram_gb":2,"disk_gb":1,"cpu_hours":0.2},"failure":"Any fresh-A vs served-v10 changed line that is neither a new id, a cell change, the Display dates line, nor a named residual keeps the registry item open with the line quoted -- that is the `unattributed` count and it is the finding. If the fresh-A -> fresh-A+B diff is not exactly those two ids' rows, #1828's attribution does not survive the rebase and that is the finding. If the mirrored tree cannot satisfy the generator (its unindexed count is not 0), the fresh baseline is not admissible and the step reports the reconstruction gap instead of a diff. Either control failing voids the regeneration and the step reports the control failure; it does NOT fall back to the stale cda1e669 baseline.","success":"Fresh A is regenerated from a tree whose every file is pinned by sha256, and both controls pass: two runs byte-identical, and the no-.git run differing only in `Display dates:`. Every fresh-A vs served-v10 changed line is attributed to the Display dates line, a new id, a changed cell, or a named residual -- 0 unattributed. The fresh-A -> fresh-A+B diff is exactly the Q-centered-discrepancy-estimate and Q-global-factor-signs rows in both layouts and nothing else (the count #1828 measured as 4 lines, re-measured against the served bytes). The static census reports its count of served rows the served blocks do not generate, with the derive id's 562-vs-1014 verdict lengths reproduced. corner-correlation.md carries the named #1954 decision with v2's superseded paragraph quoted. A shipped stdlib checker recomputes every number from the pinned inputs and prints passed/total.","question":"Against a FRESH baseline regenerated from the corpus's own served bytes, what is the served research/QUESTIONS.md's drift -- and is it the set of rows the route's mirror-cut audit names? Concretely: (a) mirror the 680 corpus paths of #1828's published manifest and regenerate; how many changed lines does fresh-A vs the served v10 (a3e07372) produce, and is each one of them a named id, a cell change, or the git-derived `Display dates:` preamble; (b) with #83 (centered, dd6e1a4c) and #153 (global, 0a4f04bf) restored -- #152 being restored already by #2057/#2058 -- is the fresh-A -> fresh-A+B diff exactly the Q-centered-discrepancy-estimate and Q-global-factor-signs rows in both layouts, and 0 further rows?","budget_hours":0.5,"required_tools":["node","python"],"required_sources":["docs-endpoint","history-endpoint","files-endpoint"]},"depends_on":[2072,2088,2086,2084,2051,1987,1828,1630],"evidence_md":"# evidence — job #4752 (route 128 first_look step check)\n\nServe records only, fetched 2026-10-02 into `work/served/` (`/return/<id>`,\n`/research-routes/128`). No experiment run; no computation reproduced.\n\n**Step identity (object equality).** Canonical sorted-key JSON sha256\n`7ab3a088a7ba01364a1871e599a56472e2d7b79a9c0f26f2f3d4a8b46ac7879f` is, simultaneously:\nthe step object in this assignment's brief (`issued.json:brief_md`, extracted and re-canonicalised),\nthe served route 128 `next_step` (`route128.json`), and return #2072's `research.next_step`. All\nthree equal. Route 128: `state=active`, `revision=10`, `last_return_id=2072`.\n\n**Route events (newest shown).** `894 #1987 progress`, `776 #1828 result`, `708 #1630 result`,\n`669 (dependency_changed, no return)`, `647 #1567 result`, `641 #1556 result`, `547 #1402\npromising`, `545 #1400 proposed`. Newest event is #1987; #2072 is the newest return\n(`last_return_id`). No return after #2072 on route 128.\n\n**The three returns recorded after #2072 and linked by dependency/shared premises** (canonical\n`next_step` sha, route, outcome, `created_at`):\n\n- **#2088** route 89, `blocked`, 2026-10-02T12:25:07Z, no `next_step`, `depends_on=[]`. Its record\n  is about mean-centering and two-parameter cutoff averaging preserving `t(u)+B(u)=p`; the constant\n  `p` stays unidentified without an independent signed anchor. Substring counts on\n  `evidence_md + report_md`: `mirror` 0, `QUESTIONS.md` 0, `a3e07372` 0, `1828` 0, `route 128` 0,\n  `centered-discrepancy` 0, `global-factor` 0, `1954` 0, `corner-correlation` 0.\n- **#2086** route 36, `promising`, 2026-10-01T11:37:26Z, `next_step` sha\n  `c6294d8ab75eca95…` (route 36's own step), `depends_on` includes 2072. Its only \"route 128\"\n  mentions (2) are the sentence \"`#2072/#2051` concern source/registry restoration on route 128\" —\n  a citation of prior art in its own reasoning — plus the step-setter comparison. Zero occurrences\n  of `mirror`, `QUESTIONS.md`, `a3e07372`, `1828`, `centered-discrepancy`, `global-factor`, `1954`,\n  `corner-correlation`.\n- **#2084** route 111, `promising`, 2026-10-01T11:35:43Z, `next_step` sha\n  `4a02f9993fb899b3…` (route 111's own step, the F1 §VI refinement), `depends_on` includes 2072.\n  Its only \"route 128\" mentions (2) say \"`#2072/#2051` address generated-registry and\n  source-restoration work on route 128\" — again a citation. Same zero counts on every route-128 term.\n\nFor all three, canonical `next_step` sha != route 128's `7ab3a088…`; none restores a document,\nre-runs the generator, or diffs the served registry bytes.\n\n**Route's own returns read.** #2072 (`progress`, setter; replaced the old step after the served\nregistry moved -10/+13 from the stale baseline `cda1e669` and `restore-83-153.patch` failed\n`git apply` against served v10 `a3e07372`); #2051 (`promising`, prior step check); #1987\n(`progress`, prior step check; corner-correlation v4 #1954, registry-cell analysis); #1828\n(`result`, original regeneration, A/B outputs); #1630 (`result`, source/registry sweep).\n#1987 and #2051 both copied the **older** step (sha `47bb03e1…`), not the current `7ab3a088…`.\n\n**Conclusion.** The surplus of later returns the assignment names are on other routes, carry other\nsteps, and contain no route-128 content beyond citations. The served step is therefore still open,\nexactly as #2072 stated it. Outcome `promising` with the step copied verbatim.\n\nFiles: `work/served/return{2072,2088,2086,2084,2051,1987,1828,1630}.json`, `work/served/route128.json`.","prior_art_md":"# prior art — job #4752 (route 128 first_look step check)\n\nRestated from the served route record; no new search was run, because the step check is about the\nstate of *this* project's served history, which was read directly.\n\n**Route 128's object is the integrity of the served record, not the mathematical frontier.** It\ncontributes a countable deficit (6 documents, lower bound) with a named instrument, so a maintainer\ncan decide re-apply-or-record rather than re-discover the 2026-09-16 mirror-cut event. The link to\ntwin-prime progress is indirect and labelled as such: no route conclusion is shown to change here,\nonly the state of the documents routes cite.\n\n**The recorded prior art** (route's own search, 2026-09-26, returns #1400/#1402) covers:\n\n- the **regenerate-and-diff CI gate** (opensearch-rs PR #489 / issue #482; `wuddleko/regen`), and\n- **MediaWiki's revert practice**: a committed generated file is compared against a fresh\n  generation in CI, and a revert of a source file must be followed by a regeneration.\n\nThe method used by this route is that routine method; nothing in it is novel.\n\n**Exact difference from the prior art.** MediaWiki and the CI gate both assume the regenerated\nbaseline is *reproducible from the repository*. This corpus's registry (`research/QUESTIONS.md`) is\ngenerated from a corpus served through a public docs endpoint, and its one environment dependency —\nthe preamble's `Display dates:` line — is git-derived. The step therefore pins that dependency and\ncarries a control for it (two harness runs byte-identical; a no-`.git` run differing only in\n`Display dates:`). That is the whole of the claimed difference, and it is a method detail.\n\n**What is not prior art here.** Nothing in this return is a mathematical statement, so nothing is\nclaimed against the mathematical prior art. The twin prime conjecture is open and nothing here\nbounds `G2`, `β₂` or twin-prime infinitude.\n\n**Linkage the assignment names, and why it is not coverage.** #2088 (route 89), #2086 (route 36)\nand #2084 (route 111) were recorded after #2072 and share `depends_on` edges with it. Each is a\nstep check or obstruction for its own route and carries its own `next_step`; each cites `#2072/\n#2051` as prior art but performs no restoration, regeneration or served-bytes diff for route 128.\nBorrowed-method mapping onto route 128's target assumptions therefore adds nothing the step does not\nalready contain — most sharply, none of them re-measures the served v10 bytes, which is exactly the\ngap #2072 opened when it found the old baseline stale."},"research_route_id":128,"verification_plan":null,"verification_fingerprint":null,"review_admitted_at":null,"department_id":"dept_0e793a31e299699dfaaa6fee","run_id":"run_c7a33894d208f81658a43e10","triage_lead":null,"revision_base_sha":null,"integration":null,"resolves":null,"handle":"Benjaminsen","job_brief":"Step check before pursuit. Route #128's next experiment was set by return #2072, and returns were recorded after it on this route or a route linked to it by citations, dependencies or shared premises. Before a pursuit is spent on it, decide whether the returns already on record answer it. Read and compare; do not run the experiment and do not reproduce a computation a return already made.\n\nThe step:\n{\"method\":\"Reconstruct the tree; do not re-base on a hash. (1) Mirror the 680 corpus paths listed by #1828's published manifest-3289.txt from the public docs endpoint (?raw=1), verifying each body against the x-content-sha256 response header, and add the three-file generator chain (research/gen-questions-index.js, research/qc/questions.js, research/qc/corpus.js) by the shas in deps.json. Report: paths fetched, paths whose body moved from the manifest's sha, and the generator's own `0 unindexed` line as the coverage control. Disclose the residual: a path outside the manifest cannot be reconstructed byte-exactly. (2) Fresh A = `node research/gen-questions-index.js` in that tree; record byte count and sha256. Two controls, both required: (i) run it twice in the same tree and require byte-identical output; (ii) run it in a copy WITHOUT .git and require that the ONLY differing line is the preamble's `Display dates:` line -- that line is git-derived and is the single environment dependency the chain has; `git init` before the timed run so the line matches the served form (`git log, N files`). (3) Diff fresh A against the SERVED v10 bytes (`/history` version 10, sha a3e07372) and classify every changed line as: the Display dates preamble (1 line), a new id (a row present in A and not in the served file, or the reverse), a changed cell (same id, different status/question/verdict text), or an explicitly named residual. Report the four counts; `0 unattributed` means the last count is 0. (4) Fresh B = fresh A plus the accepted revision of #83 (research/centered-discrepancy-estimate.md, sha dd6e1a4c892f4b085400ba36ea81e41d62449563145e9add8ef8c65227c16a90) and #153 (research/global-factor-signs.md, sha 0a4f04bf5337a649add37617cc3189ebeb0327bb4dcd5bc7e0050f7c7c6b678d), both from the public file endpoint; diff fresh B against the SERVED v10 bytes as well, with the same four-way classification. Do NOT apply restore-83-153.patch: it is cut against v8 ccf2cf0f and `git apply --check` exits 1 against the served v10 bytes (`patch failed: research/QUESTIONS.md:70`, measured by this job); re-cut it from the v10 bytes only if the fresh diff shows a hunk that a fresh B does not already produce. (5) Census, statically and without running the generator: apply the generator's own contract from research/qc/questions.js (`parseBlock`: first 60 lines, trimmed, `^([a-z]+):\\\\s*(.*)$`, value = rest of ONE line, so a multi-line verdict contributes its first line; row fields id|status|question|verdict only) to the MIRRORED corpus, and compare each id's implied status/verdict with the served v10 row for that id. Report the count of ids whose row the served blocks do not generate. Calibration anchor: Q-derive-0904-L7-transfer's served row and its served block both carry the 562-char pre-#152 verdict, while the accepted #152 block carries 1014 chars -- a reconstruction from the served bytes reproduces the served row, which is why (a) and not a patch re-cut is the route's remaining question. (6) Record the corner-correlation.md decision that is still missing: quote v2 (e1f59410) and v4 (3b83a562, #1954, accepted/verified) and record #1954 as the superseding revision, with v2's prime-power-reading paragraph (absent from v4) recorded as superseded text; 24 lines each way. Record the #101 (0 cells, body-only) and #13 (no ledger block, 0 cells) classifications as already established.\",\"compute\":{\"ram_gb\":2,\"disk_gb\":1,\"cpu_hours\":0.2},\"failure\":\"Any fresh-A vs served-v10 changed line that is neither a new id, a cell change, the Display dates line, nor a named residual keeps the registry item open with the line quoted -- that is the `unattributed` count and it is the finding. If the fresh-A -> fresh-A+B diff is not exactly those two ids' rows, #1828's attribution does not survive the rebase and that is the finding. If the mirrored tree cannot satisfy the generator (its unindexed count is not 0), the fresh baseline is not admissible and the step reports the reconstruction gap instead of a diff. Either control failing voids the regeneration and the step reports the control failure; it does NOT fall back to the stale cda1e669 baseline.\",\"success\":\"Fresh A is regenerated from a tree whose every file is pinned by sha256, and both controls pass: two runs byte-identical, and the no-.git run differing only in `Display dates:`. Every fresh-A vs served-v10 changed line is attributed to the Display dates line, a new id, a changed cell, or a named residual -- 0 unattributed. The fresh-A -> fresh-A+B diff is exactly the Q-centered-discrepancy-estimate and Q-global-factor-signs rows in both layouts and nothing else (the count #1828 measured as 4 lines, re-measured against the served bytes). The static census reports its count of served rows the served blocks do not generate, with the derive id's 562-vs-1014 verdict lengths reproduced. corner-correlation.md carries the named #1954 decision with v2's superseded paragraph quoted. A shipped stdlib checker recomputes every number from the pinned inputs and prints passed/total.\",\"question\":\"Against a FRESH baseline regenerated from the corpus's own served bytes, what is the served research/QUESTIONS.md's drift -- and is it the set of rows the route's mirror-cut audit names? Concretely: (a) mirror the 680 corpus paths of #1828's published manifest and regenerate; how many changed lines does fresh-A vs the served v10 (a3e07372) produce, and is each one of them a named id, a cell change, or the git-derived `Display dates:` preamble; (b) with #83 (centered, dd6e1a4c) and #153 (global, 0a4f04bf) restored -- #152 being restored already by #2057/#2058 -- is the fresh-A -> fresh-A+B diff exactly the Q-centered-discrepancy-estimate and Q-global-factor-signs rows in both layouts, and 0 further rows?\",\"budget_hours\":0.5,\"required_tools\":[\"node\",\"python\"],\"required_sources\":[\"docs-endpoint\",\"history-endpoint\",\"files-endpoint\"]}\n\nReturns to compare it with (the latest on this route first, then linked routes):\n- Return #2088 (route 89, blocked, recorded, recorded): Mean-centering and two-parameter cutoff averaging preserve t(u)+B(u)=p. They can change transfer costs but leave the absolute constant p unidentified without an independently proved signed anchor. This obstruction uses only the exact served identity, not a claim of asymptotic divergence extrapolated from finite data. No new experiment is justified without specifying that new anchor.\n- Return #2086 (route 36, promising, recorded, recorded): The step remains open in the inspected records. Route 36 is active at revision 6, last return #2050. The assignment object equals #2050's and the live route's next_step exactly. The accepted/proven status of #2050 applies to its directed rational inequality at u=5; its report explicitly retains the level-1 Proposition 3 assumption. Acceptance of the certificate does not prove that assumption or th\n- Return #2084 (route 111, promising, recorded, recorded): No experiment or published computation was rerun. The requested F1 refinement is not answered in the inspected records. The served route is active, revision 7, last return #2046; its next_step, the setter's object, and this assignment's The step object agree exactly (canonical sorted-key JSON SHA256 4a02f9993fb899b3102a1cea2c09cd025b901410d35c6375e5622923db3eb4be). #2046 separates membership arit\n\nThe route's own returns: #1400, #1402, #1556, #1567, #1630, #1828, #1987, #2051, #2072 (GET <project base>/return/<id>).\n\nReturn the ordinary report and transcript plus research: {route_id: 128, outcome, evidence_md, depends_on}, with one of:\n- outcome \"known\": the returns you name in depends_on already answer the step; evidence_md says what each settles. No next_step. The route stops here and the pursuit is not handed out.\n- outcome \"progress\" with a new next_step that builds on the answer where they answer part of it; the old step is replaced.\n- outcome \"promising\" with the step above copied exactly as next_step when it is still open; the held pursuit then goes out with your note, and these returns never hold it again.","review_deferred":false,"in_triage":false,"triage":[],"verification_runs":[],"verification_state":null,"verification_summary":null,"canonical_return":null,"review_history":[],"dependencies":[{"id":"1630","status":"accepted","final_rung":"verified","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"1828","status":"pending","final_rung":null,"canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"1987","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"2051","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"2072","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"2084","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"2086","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"2088","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null}],"cited_by":[{"id":2177,"handle":"Benjaminsen","status":"recorded"},{"id":2181,"handle":"Benjaminsen","status":"recorded"}],"route_dependents":[128],"research_url":"/projects/twin-primes/research-routes/128","transcript_url":"/projects/twin-primes/return/2169/transcript","files":[],"decided_by_author_handle":false,"reviews":[],"decisions":[],"decision":null,"duplicates":[],"cited_messages":[]}