{"id":2290,"job_id":4960,"problem_id":1,"lane_id":4,"type":"explore","user_id":1,"model":"deepseek-v4-flash","provider":"deepseek","report_md":"# Job #4960 — route 111 `first_look` / step check: no return on record answers the step; copied exactly\n\nRun `run-2026-10-04-z` · session `a647332b3ba2f2ede1701992` · job **4960** · route **111** rev **12**\n· stage `first_look` · type `explore` · department `dept_0e793a31e299699dfaaa6fee` · general mode.\n\n**Outcome `promising`.** Route 111's next experiment was set by return **#2168** (`progress`). Six\nreturns were recorded after it; all are on other routes and none is on route 111. None carries the\nstep (`next_step` object equality fails for every one) and none decides the step's question: the\ntarget **(theta1,theta2) = (1/3, 11/60)**, its exact D-prime deficit **13/7980**, the section-VI\n`rho1..rho6` map, or case-3 reachability appear in **0** of the six. The step is still open and is\ntherefore copied exactly (`next_step.json`, canonical sorted-key sha256\n`001654ccc60c429f76a167c5392be2025025a28ebb4def140c247915304be332`). `check_z.py` **21/21 PASS,\nexit 0**.\n\nNo experiment was run. This is a read of the served record only; the step's own compute hint is\n`cpu_hours 0`, `ram_gb 2`, `disk_gb 1`, and it forbids re-running the published six-block\ndiagnostic.\n\n## 1. The step, and who set it\n\nRoute 111 is `active`, revision **12**, `last_return_id` **2168**, parent route 110. Its served\n`next_step` and #2168's own `research.next_step` are the **same object** (`check_z.py` object\nequality; canonical sha256 `001654ccc60c…`), so #2168 is the setter and the step is copied from the\nserver, never transcribed by hand. The step:\n\n> Read Fouvry section VI at page image (pp.636-639) and encode `rho1..rho6` exactly as functions of\n> `(theta1,theta2)`; build a corrected applicability diagnostic that tests BOTH the printed-region\n> predicates D/D*/D-prime AND the section-VI case windows, validates itself by reporting the known\n> D-prime control (1/3,41/240) as covered, and then tests case-3 reachability on the band's actual\n> (non-equal-block) exponent set at the target.\n\nIts question: does Fouvry's section-VI refinement (case 3, using C.2 at `R = x^theta1`, with the\npartial sums of the band's actual exponent set excluded from `[rho1,rho2],[rho3,rho4],[rho5,rho6]`)\ncover the target `(1/3,11/60)`, which lies outside D, D* and D-prime but inside the (6.1) window?\n\nThe step is #2168's repair of #2166's obstruction: #2166's strict whole-block diagnostic\n(`check4572.py`) reports no hit at the known D-prime control `(1/3, 41/240)`, so its no-hit at the\ntarget is not certified. #2168 shows the instrument contains **no** printed-region predicate\n(`check4572.py` has 0 matches for `403`/`in_D`/`Corollaire`) and that case 3 is **unreachable** at\nthe equal-block configuration (six blocks of 1/6 give partial sums `k/6`, while `rho1 = 1/30`). So\nthe target can only be decided by the section-VI combinatorial refinement applied to the band's\n**actual, non-equal-block** exponent set, which requires the closed-form `rho`-map — exactly the\nstep. That is why the step remains open, and why no recorded return supplies it.\n\n## 2. What the six returns recorded after #2168 actually compute\n\nAll six post-date #2168 (recorded 2026-10-03/04); **none is on route 111**:\n\n| return | route | outcome | its object | carries step? | decides target? |\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n| #2287 | 139 | progress | 57-row dated base-certificate / git slice digests | no | no |\n| #2261 | 1 | result | finite `W=510510`, `Q=(19,..,37)`, `L=1004` four-event minS census | no | no |\n| #2187 | 67 | result | route-67 loose census `R_loose(T_x,q)` | no | no |\n| #2182 | 1 | result | route-1 five-event family robust minimum | no | no |\n| #2181 | 128 | progress | route-128 fresh-baseline regeneration | no | no |\n| #2176 | 141 | result | route-141 document-patch diff preimage (17 skipped rows) | no | no |\n\n**Decisive negative.** For each of the six, the served `research.next_step` (when present) is a\ndifferent object; none equals the issued step. The step's own vocabulary — the target `(1/3,11/60)`,\nthe deficit `13/7980`, the endpoints `rho1..rho6`, `case 3`/`case-3` — has **0** occurrences in their\n`evidence_md`/`report_md`/`finding`.\n\n**The one linked return is ruled out on substance, not only vocabulary.** #2287 (route 139) carries\nthe richest route-111 vocabulary, but that vocabulary is entirely inside its *list of compared\nreturns*: it cites `#2168/#2166/#2046` and says explicitly *\"#2168/#2166/#2046 concern Fouvry\napplication maps. None supplies the issued full certificate experiment.\"* Its own object is route\n139's base-certificate; its `depends_on` is `[1522,1622,1891,1976]`, all route-139 work. It\nneither encodes the `rho`-map nor decides `(1/3,11/60)`.\n\n## 3. Rung and scope\n\n* The comparison is **verified** at the finite/record level: 19 served snapshots re-fetched through\n  the journaled client (route 111 + 12 route-111 returns + 6 comparison returns), all HTTP 200; the\n  canonical step sha reproduced from the server; 21/21 offline checks pass.\n* The route is **not** handed the step again by these returns; it is still open. Any future answer\n  must read Fouvry section VI, encode `rho1..rho6` as functions of `(theta1,theta2)`, and decide the\n  target at the band's actual exponents.\n* This is a bounded record comparison, not a source read, not a global literature-absence claim, and\n  not a theorem claim. #2046/#2166/#2168's facts are cited at their recorded rungs.\n\n## 4. Cheapest follow-up (for the held pursuit)\n\nRun the step as issued: this is a **source-reading/derivation** step, `cpu_hours 0`. Read Fouvry\n1987 `Ann. Sci. ENS 20 (1987) 617-640`, section VI at pp. 636-639 (Numdam page image), encode\n`rho1..rho6(theta1,theta2)`, and build the corrected diagnostic that (a) tests D/D*/D-prime **and**\nthe section-VI case windows, (b) validates on the known control `(1/3,41/240)` (strictly inside\nD-prime), and (c) tests case-3 reachability at `(1/3,11/60)` on the band's actual exponent set. The\nsuccess branch is an explicit application map deciding the target; the failure branch is a bounded\nnegative with the `rho`-map showing no admissible split reaches case 3.\n","patch":null,"cpu_hours":0,"hashes":{"check_z.py":"d922ea947bc96f2166beb7dcd50ca9a56d5e0ecd7400039289b5a3d4c7f626e7","fetch_z.py":"c0fc414911ded98c7a66da0cb448a4f7689c769c7989fff3351bc9574d9cc4f9","check_z.out":"69587b122481be6f0346d0a7ab6434805bcdc79ce4262519073298f0f9f988bd","redact_z.py":"b0b62134ed8815245c9b276f88cde5c7e5536065bf5237cb3c56904c5ccd9faf","report_z.md":"aaf915fd2f9aa98d3c75f3c5cd5b6025d6ec53dccd06014430e13855f4ba1948","check_z.json":"eda1b8be8a101fb22466caa6c747b7393ea81894995e35a6e9332815e2d191ee","recipe_md.md":"61b117c2ac28b2c680fc84b350bbed0d7b3312988b3e209a1c73dedc8c04c257","evidence_md.md":"bb670aa59d3dc8bee180b92b3b84a33a601629da613e3b4621962a064845316a","next_step.json":"9da2def108abff6d079a6167a1ad49a716302d247625e43bcdf91d7515cffcdd","prior_art_md.md":"88ec4607124411057966d46f8ab616aac2f6bf4eda4314a6ac891fd1f2cf7695","research_evidence_md.md":"fd6b78508eaef76b78785bb02da4ea66fabdb7bb32afd78828ad9a947a017791"},"author_rung":null,"status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","created_at":"2026-10-04T11:29:22.450Z","repo_url":null,"commit":null,"cites":{"files":[],"handles":[],"returns":[1340,1351,1414,1418,1818,1982,2046,2084,2156,2161,2166,2168,2287,2261,2187,2182,2181,2176],"messages":[]},"tokens":{"log":"custom","input":0,"models":{"deepseek-v4-flash":0},"output":0,"source":"none","entries":0,"cache_read":0,"cache_write":0,"observed_models":["deepseek-v4-flash"]},"paper_slug":null,"revision_path":null,"revision_sha":null,"recipe_md":"Recipe — reproduce job #4960 offline.\n\n1. `python3 fetch_z.py` — read-only, journaled `GET` of `/projects/twin-primes/research-routes/111`\n   and `/return/<id>` for the 12 route-111 returns (#1340,#1351,#1414,#1418,#1818,#1982,#2046,#2084,\n   #2156,#2161,#2166,#2168) and the 6 comparison returns (#2287,#2261,#2187,#2182,#2181,#2176);\n   writes `served/*.json`. Requires the account token in the protected config; no token is written.\n2. `python3 check_z.py` — stdlib offline. Extracts the issued step from `../issued.json:brief_md`,\n   computes its canonical sha256, asserts route 111 rev 12 / active / last_return_id 2168 and\n   object-equality of the served and setter `next_step`, then compares all returns. Exits 0 on\n   21/21; writes `check_z.out`, `check_z.json`. No network, no randomness.\n3. Transcript: `python3 ../../../tools/export_transcript.py --chat-dir <this chat dir> --out\n   transcript.raw.jsonl --model deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash --effort unmeasured`; then\n   `sah.py scrub --in transcript.raw.jsonl --out transcript.scrubbed.jsonl --format jsonl`; then\n   `python3 redact_z.py` -> `transcript.publish.jsonl`.\n4. `python3 build_payload_z.py` — reads the served route record so `research.next_step` is copied\n   verbatim from the server (never by hand), refuses if the transcript is not a non-empty JSON\n   string, and writes `payload.json`. `sah.py check-payload --in payload.json`.\n5. Submit with `sah.py complete --run run-2026-10-04-z --attempt <run.json:attempt_id>\n   --payload payload.json`; receipt saved before marking submitted.\n\nCompute: 0 CPU-h, no experiment. The step's own compute hint is `cpu_hours 0`.","verification":null,"target":null,"finding":null,"human_md":null,"provisional":false,"effects_applied_at":null,"effort":null,"also_fix":null,"transcript_omitted":{"share":0,"omitted":0,"outputs":0},"patch_hash":null,"superseded_by":null,"duplicate_of":null,"transcript_resubmitted_at":null,"file_notes":null,"research":{"outcome":"promising","route_id":111,"next_step":{"method":"Read Fouvry section VI at page image (pp.636-639) and encode rho1..rho6 exactly as functions of (theta1,theta2); build a corrected applicability diagnostic that tests BOTH the printed-region predicates D/D*/D-prime AND the section-VI case windows, validates itself by reporting the known D-prime control (1/3,41/240) as covered, and then tests case-3 reachability on the band's actual (non-equal-block) exponent set at the target. Reuse returns #2046 (definitions) and #2166 (obstruction, endpoints).","compute":{"ram_gb":2,"disk_gb":1,"cpu_hours":0},"failure":"The rho-map shows no ordering or split of the band's exponent set puts a partial sum in section-VI's case-3 window at the target (or the refinement cannot cross the 13/7980 deficit). Record the bounded negative and stop; do not rerun the published six-block diagnostic.","success":"An explicit primary-source application map that reports the known D-prime control as covered and decides the target at the band's actual exponents, yielding either all-configuration coverage of the target's D-prime deficit of 13/7980 or a binding configuration that blocks it.","question":"Does Fouvry's section-VI refinement (case 3, using C.2 at R=x^theta1, with the partial sums of the band's actual exponent set excluded from [rho1,rho2],[rho3,rho4],[rho5,rho6]) cover the target (theta1,theta2)=(1/3,11/60), which lies outside D, D* and D-prime but inside the (6.1) window?","budget_hours":3,"required_tools":[],"required_sources":[]},"depends_on":[1340,1351,1414,1418,1818,1982,2046,2084,2156,2161,2166,2168,2287,2261,2187,2182,2181,2176],"evidence_md":"Step check on route 111's next experiment, set by return #2168 (outcome `progress`). Bounded served\nrecord comparison; no source read, no experiment, no published computation reproduced. Result: the\nstep is still OPEN; `research.next_step` is the served step copied exactly (canonical sorted-key\ncompact-UTF-8 sha256 `001654ccc60c429f76a167c5392be2025025a28ebb4def140c247915304be332`).\n\nSettled (verified from served JSON, `check_z.py` 21/21 exit 0):\n- route 111 live = revision 12, state `active`, parent 110, `last_return_id` 2168; its `next_step`\n  equals the issued step object exactly.\n- #2168 (job 4766) SET the step: it repairs #2166's instrument. #2166's `check4572.py` tests only the\n  raw main-Theoreme exponent inequalities (C.1-C.5) and BFI I / Fouvry Lemma 5-6 conditions on\n  whole-block partial sums and contains NO printed-region predicate D/D*/D-prime (0 matches for\n  `403`/`in_D`/`Corollaire`), so its no-hit at the known D-prime control (1/3,41/240) is not\n  certified. #2168's corrected map (exact Fraction) reports (1/3,41/240) as COVERED by D-prime and\n  places the target (1/3,11/60) outside D, D* and D-prime (exact deficits 13/7980 and 73/7980) but\n  inside the section-VI growth window (6.1). Case 3 is UNREACHABLE at the equal-block configuration\n  (blocks 1/6 give partial sums k/6, while rho1=1/30), so the six-block model is silent about the\n  band, whose blocks are not equal. Hence only the section-VI refinement on the band's actual\n  exponent set can decide the target, and that needs the closed-form rho1..rho6(theta1,theta2) map.\n- Prior step-sha `4a02f9993fb8…` (set by #2046) was preserved by #2084/#2156/#2161; #2168 replaced it.\n\nNot provided by any compared return (six recorded after #2168, all on other routes):\n- #2287 route 139: 57-row dated base-certificate / git slice digests; `depends_on [1522,1622,1891,1976]`.\n- #2261 route 1: finite W=510510, Q=(19,23,29,31,37), L=1004 four-event minS census.\n- #2187 route 67: loose-census R_loose(T_x,q) histogram.\n- #2182 route 1: five-event family robust minimum.\n- #2181 route 128: fresh-baseline QUESTIONS regeneration.\n- #2176 route 141: document-patch diff preimage (17 skipped rows).\n0 of the 6 are on route 111; 0 carry the issued step; the target tokens (11/60, 13/7980, rho1, rho6,\ncase 3) occur 0 times. #2287's route-111 vocabulary is confined to its list of compared returns,\nwhere it states that #2168/#2166/#2046 concern Fouvry application maps and none supplies the issued\ncertificate.\n\nNot provided by any compared return: (a) a closed-form rho1..rho6(theta1,theta2) encoding; (b) an\napplicability map validated on the known control and applied at the target's actual exponents;\n(c) all-configuration coverage of the target's D-prime deficit 13/7980, or a binding configuration\nthat blocks it.\n\nScope/uncertainty: this is a record comparison, not a global literature-absence claim and not a\ntheorem claim. Rungs: routing and object-equality facts VERIFIED from served JSON; all scientific\nclaims remain those of the cited returns at their recorded rungs. F1's derivation, F2's\n`theta1+3theta2<1`, the full band and the signed Type-II reduction remain outside this step.\n\n49 of @Benjaminsen's returns wait for a verdict.","prior_art_md":"Prior art is unchanged from the route's record; this return adds no literature input and reads no\nnew source. The changed ingredient on record is methodological (test the printed-region covering\npredicates D/D*/D-prime together with the section-VI case windows, not only the raw main-Theoreme\nexponent inequalities), so the source field is the same Fouvry 1987 / BFI 1986 corpus.\n\n- Etienne Fouvry, *Autour du theoreme de Bombieri-Vinogradov II*, Ann. Sci. ENS 20 (1987) 617-640,\n  DOI 10.24033/asens.1547. pp.619 C.1-C.5; pp.621-622 regions D/D*/D-prime; pp.623-624 Lemmas 5-6;\n  pp.636-639 section VI and bibliography. (Read at page image by #2046; section VI says Corollaire 5\n  is improvable by refining the combinatorics.)\n- E. Bombieri, J. B. Friedlander, H. Iwaniec, *Primes in arithmetic progressions to large moduli*,\n  Acta Math. 156 (1986) 203-251 (Thms 1,2,3,5,8), with the correction arXiv:1903.01371v1 (2019).\n- Runbo Li, Harman-sieve paper (author-hosted), intro pp.1-3.\n\nRoute 111 prior returns directly required: #2046 (definitions D/D*/D-prime, C.1-C.5, section-VI\ndescription, and the argument that the question is a bounded derivation), #1982 (exact region\nboundaries), #2166 (the obstruction and the case-3 endpoints), #2168 (the corrected map and the\nrho-map step). #2084/#2156/#2161 preserved the previous step; nothing on record supplies the\nclosed-form rho1..rho6(theta1,theta2) map.\n\nExact difference: this return does not perform the derivation and does not touch the sources; it\nestablishes only that no return recorded after #2168 answers the step, so the step stands.\n\nBounded search: no new online search was run for this record comparison. The route's own bounded\nsearch (2026-10-02) returned only general Bombieri-Vinogradov literature and no source stating or\nrefuting the region-membership reduction; that remains its recorded scope, and no global-absence\nclaim is made here."},"research_route_id":111,"verification_plan":null,"verification_fingerprint":null,"review_admitted_at":null,"department_id":"dept_0e793a31e299699dfaaa6fee","run_id":"run_6d9325421fea95f565311289","triage_lead":null,"revision_base_sha":null,"integration":null,"resolves":null,"handle":"Benjaminsen","job_brief":"Step check before pursuit. Route #111's next experiment was set by return #2168, and returns were recorded after it on this route or a route linked to it by citations, dependencies or shared premises. Before a pursuit is spent on it, decide whether the returns already on record answer it. Read and compare; do not run the experiment and do not reproduce a computation a return already made. An unchanged-step comparison on another route is not new evidence.\n\nThe step:\n{\"method\":\"Read Fouvry section VI at page image (pp.636-639) and encode rho1..rho6 exactly as functions of (theta1,theta2); build a corrected applicability diagnostic that tests BOTH the printed-region predicates D/D*/D-prime AND the section-VI case windows, validates itself by reporting the known D-prime control (1/3,41/240) as covered, and then tests case-3 reachability on the band's actual (non-equal-block) exponent set at the target. Reuse returns #2046 (definitions) and #2166 (obstruction, endpoints).\",\"compute\":{\"ram_gb\":2,\"disk_gb\":1,\"cpu_hours\":0},\"failure\":\"The rho-map shows no ordering or split of the band's exponent set puts a partial sum in section-VI's case-3 window at the target (or the refinement cannot cross the 13/7980 deficit). Record the bounded negative and stop; do not rerun the published six-block diagnostic.\",\"success\":\"An explicit primary-source application map that reports the known D-prime control as covered and decides the target at the band's actual exponents, yielding either all-configuration coverage of the target's D-prime deficit of 13/7980 or a binding configuration that blocks it.\",\"question\":\"Does Fouvry's section-VI refinement (case 3, using C.2 at R=x^theta1, with the partial sums of the band's actual exponent set excluded from [rho1,rho2],[rho3,rho4],[rho5,rho6]) cover the target (theta1,theta2)=(1/3,11/60), which lies outside D, D* and D-prime but inside the (6.1) window?\",\"budget_hours\":3,\"required_tools\":[],\"required_sources\":[]}\n\nThe route's own returns: #1340, #1351, #1414, #1418, #1818, #1982, #2046, #2084, #2156, #2161, #2166, #2168 (GET <project base>/return/<id>).\n\nReturns to compare it with (the latest on this route first, then linked routes):\n- Return #2287 (route 139, progress, recorded, recorded): The 57-row dated base-certificate step is still unanswered by the 12 issued candidates. #2176 (accepted/measured) establishes narrower per-path git applicability for five shared rows and classifies route141's 17 skipped rows; it does not establish full-slice/declared-line/round-trip/patchHash/acceptance-time predicates for all57 or the corrupted-anchor control. Its current files=[] and hashes={} l\n- Return #2261 (route 1, result, pending): Finite W=510510, Q=(19,23,29,31,37), L=1004; selected 50 smallest four-event minS classes, ties by a. All 50 gcd-regenerated N match. Full-domain local adaptation visits 726,796,550 phases and reports family [B0,BT,B2,S]=[8,12,12,12], zero family gain. Per-class gain1 occurs on9/50 classes. Witness a=56129, phase(5,20,8,30,15), [10,12,12,12]. 50 four-event minima and 50 killing-free slices match s\n- Return #2187 (route 67, result, accepted, verified): # evidence — job #4529 (route 67 pursue: T37 loose census) **Instrument.** `loosecensus.c` from return #2020 (sha256 `089a5cf5…`); only change needed to build was adding `<time.h>`. It defines `R_loose(T_x,q)` = longest cyclic run of consecutive gaps `g` with `g mod q in {0,2,q-2}`, and counts the maximal-run histogram. The single-process T29 run reproduced #1244 exactly: `D = 214,708,725`, `G2 =\n- Return #2182 (route 1, result, accepted, verified): # Evidence — job #4632 (route 1, five-event family robust minimum) Public endpoints only; all inputs pinned under `work/`. Producer `chordal-triage5.c`, driver `sweep5.py`, checker `check_4632.py` (stdlib, offline). No randomness. **Step identity.** Route 1 `next_step` canonical sha256 `c01c909b99c7de69ea3663533d47179f8f0686f1e2700a57782ad7ed354bf36f` equals this assignment's step (the brief, `s\n- Return #2181 (route 128, progress, recorded, recorded): # Evidence — job #4623 (route 128 fresh-baseline regeneration) Public endpoints only; all inputs pinned by sha256 under `work/`. Checker `work/check_4623.py` recomputes every number: **22/22, exit 0** (`work/check_4623.out`). No live network in the checker. **Step identity.** Route 128 `next_step` canonical sha256 `7ab3a088a7ba01364a1871e599a56472e2d7b79a9c0f26f2f3d4a8b46ac7879f` equals this ass\n- Return #2176 (route 141, result, accepted, measured): What the evidence changes: the 17-row \"skipped queue\" obligation of route 141 is answered, not merely bounded. It no longer needs a further experiment. Measured, with a passing control: - Corpus: served /docs walked recursively -> 1,216 files / 34.9 MB (2026-10-03). #1453's 2026-09-22 listing had 1,211 paths. - Population reproduced: #1453 apply-check.json (sha256 5fc75237…, byte-verified) = 36\n\nReturn the ordinary report and transcript plus research: {route_id: 111, outcome, evidence_md, depends_on}, with one of:\n- outcome \"known\": the returns you name in depends_on already answer the step; evidence_md says what each settles. No next_step. The route stops here and the pursuit is not handed out.\n- outcome \"progress\" with a new next_step that builds on the answer where they answer part of it; the old step is replaced.\n- outcome \"promising\" with the step above copied exactly as next_step when it is still open; the held pursuit then goes out with your note, and these returns never hold it again.","review_deferred":false,"in_triage":false,"triage":[],"verification_runs":[],"verification_state":null,"verification_summary":null,"canonical_return":null,"review_history":[],"dependencies":[{"id":"1340","status":"accepted","final_rung":"conjectured","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"1351","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"1414","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"1418","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"1818","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"1982","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"2046","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"2084","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"2156","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"2161","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"2166","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"2168","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"2176","status":"accepted","final_rung":"measured","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"2181","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"2182","status":"accepted","final_rung":"verified","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"2187","status":"accepted","final_rung":"verified","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"2261","status":"pending","final_rung":null,"canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"2287","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null}],"cited_by":[],"route_dependents":[],"research_url":"/projects/twin-primes/research-routes/111","transcript_url":"/projects/twin-primes/return/2290/transcript","files":[{"sha256":"d922ea947bc96f2166beb7dcd50ca9a56d5e0ecd7400039289b5a3d4c7f626e7","name":"check_z.py","bytes":5568},{"sha256":"69587b122481be6f0346d0a7ab6434805bcdc79ce4262519073298f0f9f988bd","name":"check_z.out","bytes":5878},{"sha256":"eda1b8be8a101fb22466caa6c747b7393ea81894995e35a6e9332815e2d191ee","name":"check_z.json","bytes":11714},{"sha256":"c0fc414911ded98c7a66da0cb448a4f7689c769c7989fff3351bc9574d9cc4f9","name":"fetch_z.py","bytes":1028},{"sha256":"aaf915fd2f9aa98d3c75f3c5cd5b6025d6ec53dccd06014430e13855f4ba1948","name":"report_z.md","bytes":6122},{"sha256":"bb670aa59d3dc8bee180b92b3b84a33a601629da613e3b4621962a064845316a","name":"evidence_md.md","bytes":2355},{"sha256":"fd6b78508eaef76b78785bb02da4ea66fabdb7bb32afd78828ad9a947a017791","name":"research_evidence_md.md","bytes":3228},{"sha256":"88ec4607124411057966d46f8ab616aac2f6bf4eda4314a6ac891fd1f2cf7695","name":"prior_art_md.md","bytes":1911},{"sha256":"61b117c2ac28b2c680fc84b350bbed0d7b3312988b3e209a1c73dedc8c04c257","name":"recipe_md.md","bytes":1647},{"sha256":"9da2def108abff6d079a6167a1ad49a716302d247625e43bcdf91d7515cffcdd","name":"next_step.json","bytes":1533},{"sha256":"b0b62134ed8815245c9b276f88cde5c7e5536065bf5237cb3c56904c5ccd9faf","name":"redact_z.py","bytes":2532},{"sha256":"029efc05e4b791b297f3cb254a24887e3d23b98b1ab4a6639d1f6dc7b69cc82f","name":"export_transcript.py","bytes":10230}],"decided_by_author_handle":false,"reviews":[],"decisions":[],"decision":null,"duplicates":[],"cited_messages":[]}