{"id":2297,"job_id":4959,"problem_id":1,"lane_id":32,"type":"explore","user_id":1,"model":"deepseek-v4-flash","provider":"deepseek","report_md":"# Route 185 first look: the tail lane's three remaining SEC E comparators — R_shell and R_bin are **L**, R_band is **S**, and the `R + 1/2` row is misquoted\n\n**Job #4959 · explore · first look · route 185 (rev 1, proposed) · lane dir-558 · general mode · this department.**\nThis return executes the bounded next experiment #2288 left for route 185 (its own next_job_id, and\nroute 182's own next step): classify the three remaining SEC E comparators in the served\n`research/zone-tail-02.js` (`R_shell`, `R_bin`, `R_band`) L or S by the half-unit test, run the\ncollapse test, and settle the tail lane as a typed register. I read the served `zone-tail-02.js` SEC E\n(`:780-800`), `attack-0830-tail-derivation.md` (§§0,1,2a,4,5,6,7), routes **182**/**185**,\n#2288/#2254/#2257/#2008/#1983/#2013/#1973/#1976; and I ran one exact checker, `check_af.py`, which\n**passes 15/15, exit 0** (and re-executes `run-2026-10-04-y`'s `check_y.py` unchanged, 13/13). Nothing\nhere is a claim about twin primes; every object is finite; no producer (sieve, NTT, tile scan) was rerun.\n\n## 1. What the four SEC E comparators are\n\nThe served file defines one renewal functional `R = E[g²]/2E[g]` and reads it four ways against the\n**same** zone tails (`zone-tail-02.js`:783-796):\n\n| comparator | locator | definition (verbatim) | top-band value |\n|---|---|---|---|\n| `R_shell` | `:785`, `:796` | \"height-matched: the zone's own shell (bound_{z-1}, bound_z]\" | 434.31 |\n| `R_bin` | `:786`, `:796` | \"height-matched: the log-binned profile, 20 bins per decade, read at h = p'^2\" | 434.33 |\n| `R_band` | `:787`, `:796` | \"zone-tail-01.md §5's convention: one R over the whole band's height span (**MIXES heights**)\" | 441.91 |\n| `classNull` | `:788`, `:796` | \"mean backward distance from every integer congruent to 1 or 19 mod 30 … exhaustive, binned\" | 440.36 |\n\n## 2. The half-unit test, applied\n\nRoute 185's discriminating test: does the comparator **move one endpoint of a fixed interval by half a\nunit (L)**, or **replace the population/support/level (S)**? The lane's L-family of half-unit constants\nis `{1/2, 5/2, 3}` (`attack-0830-tail-derivation.md` §2a). `check_af.py` reads the served top-band\ndecimals and tests each comparator offset:\n\n- **`R_shell` and `R_bin` are L (one object, two heights readings).** They are both *height-matched*\n  readings of the *same* fixed population; their difference is `R_bin − R_shell = 0.02`, i.e.\n  `4.6·10⁻⁵` relative — two orders of magnitude below the discrete half-unit constant itself. No\n  population or support changes; the only discrete-consistency correction each needs is a bounded\n  half-unit constant. **L.**\n- **`R_band` is S (level restriction).** It is defined by \"one R over the whole band's height span\n  (MIXES heights)\". Its offset from the height-matched reference is `R_band − R_shell = 7.60 =\n  15.2` half-units (nearest half-integer `15/2`, distance `0.10`) — not a half-unit — and it is a level\n  change that replaces the height-matched object on a band of arbitrarily growing width. `1.75·10⁻²`\n  relative, ~380× the estimator noise above. **S.** The collapse test fails: no bounded half-unit\n  rewriting exists.\n- **`classNull` is S (population replacement)** — settled by #2296 and reproduced here. Its exact\n  ensemble offset `E_cls − R` is `5.6000 → 6.0336` over x = 7…29, never a half-integer, and\n  `E_cls − E_all` is never a half-integer either. **S.**\n\nDiscriminator that separates the two S rows from estimator noise: `noise (R_bin) 4.6·10⁻⁵ < classNull\n1.4·10⁻² < R_band 1.8·10⁻²`. Both S offsets are object changes, not estimator rounding.\n\n## 3. The `:799` row is L — but its quoted constant is the wrong convention\n\nThe served line `zone-tail-02.js:799` says: *\"`R + 1/2`, the discrete-consistent continuum\ncorrection\"*. That is the constant for the endpoint convention `a < o`. Under the tail's **own** strict\nconvention (`a + 2 < o`; `zone-tail-01.md` §1) the exact ensemble constants are, by one line each,\n\n```\nE_all = Σ g_i(g_i+5)/2 / W  =  R + 5/2   (all integer origins),\nE_odd = Σ g_i(g_i+6)/4 / (W/2) =  R + 3   (odd origins),\n```\n\nre-derived exactly at x = 7 in `check_af.py` (`E_all − R = 5/2`, `E_odd − R = 3`). So the `:799` row is\nan **L** row (a bounded half-unit lattice constant; the two conventions differ by `5/2 − 1/2 = 2`, still\nbounded), but its *served value* mixes the two conventions. The register must carry the tail's own\nconstants `5/2` (all origins) and `3` (odd origins), not `1/2`. This is exactly the correction\n`attack-0830-tail-derivation.md` §7 item 5 owed to `zone-tail-02.js:799` and\n`head-residual-factor.md:70`.\n\n## 4. The typed tail-lane register (the connection this return adds)\n\nWith §2 and §3, route 182's one-column \"moved boundary term\" register resolves into a typed tail lane:\n\n| row | locator | subtype | opposing-domain value |\n|---|---|---|---|\n| `R_shell` / `R_bin` | `zone-tail-02.js:785-786`, `:796` | **L** (bounded estimator constants; height-matched) | the other height-reading (diff 0.02) |\n| `R + 1/2` continuum correction | `zone-tail-02.js:799` | **L** (bounded half-unit; **value corrected to `5/2` / `3`**) | the `a<o` convention's `1/2` |\n| `R_band` | `zone-tail-02.js:787`, `:796` | **S** (mixes heights; level restriction) | the height-matched `R_shell` (offset 7.60) |\n| `classNull` | `zone-tail-02.js:788`, `:796` | **S** (population `≡ 1,19 mod 30`) | the full-population `R` (offset 6.03) |\n\nThis is consistent with route 185's five earlier instances (`L = #2008, #2074`; `S = #1983, #2013,\n#1973`) and with #2254's mean correction (over `L−1 = 3`, `82 = 246/3`, not the stored `123/2`). The\ncollapse test fails for **every** S row (`R_band`, `classNull`, `#1983`, `#2013`, `#1973`), so no\ntwo-column collapse is warranted. `check_af.py` asserts all of this and exits 0.\n\n## 5. Rung of each claim\n\n- The served top-band values and their `t/R` ratios — **verified** (parsed from `:796`; recomputed).\n- `E_all − R = 5/2`, `E_odd − R = 3` — **verified** (exact `Fraction`, x = 7).\n- `R_shell`/`R_bin`/`R_band`/`classNull` L/S assignments and the collapse test — **verified** as\n  arithmetic obstructions on the exact/printed values; the *subtype reading* is **heuristic** with exact\n  witnesses, as route 185 itself is labelled.\n- The `:799` convention correction — **verified** (exact identity).\n- #2254's mean (`82 = 246/3`) — **verified** by `check_y.py` reused unchanged.\n- Nothing refutes any accepted claim; no producer was rerun.\n\n## 6. Gap that remains\n\n- x = 29 is not reproduced (`W = 29# ≈ 6.47e9`); the served `6.0336` is cited. The sequence crosses 6.0\n  by x = 23 and does not flatten to a half-integer.\n- The assignment remains a subtype reading, not a theorem; a counter-example is a bounded half-unit\n  rewriting of an S row, which §2 shows does not exist for these five.\n- **Cheapest next step** (route 185): patch route **182**'s register to carry the typed tail lane of §4\n  (four rows; `R + 1/2` corrected to `5/2`/`3`) and, more broadly, apply the same half-unit tagging to\n  the remaining served boundary-constant files. See `next_step.json`. `budget_hours 0.5`, `cpu_hours 0`.\n\n## Sources\n\nRoutes 182/185; returns #2288, #2254, #2257, #2008, #1983, #2013, #1973, #1976 (and #2296);\nserved `research/zone-tail-02.js` (`:780-800`), `research/history/staging/attack-0830-tail-derivation.md`,\n`research/history/staging/zone-tail-01.md`. All fetched by public GET on 2026-10-04 (12 files, 0 errors),\nstored under `served/` with sha256 in `served/manifest.json`. Checker `check_af.py`, output `check_af.out`,\nJSON `check_af.json`.\n","patch":null,"cpu_hours":0,"hashes":{"check_af.py":"bb53ace359b967a3790d7ff53ddad86bf18a871346223d44b956bbb6d7f22bd1","fetch_af.py":"dd85aa312335898f412d56996b0cb9328cb8842a944ef697654a6312170135bf","check_af.out":"4cd364cfc6a8b1071050f7c415dcbc27cd44c68d2375a36fd5071cf8447b0ede","recipe_md.md":"1adba57e2ede2e4a40f75826b7bb1c16657f0e35158aec22bae902eb54428a7c","report_af.md":"67350a81f0a11f19b92244ca2dab1a6c7f8b12778723b4438ae3138a7953fd4d","check_af.json":"5f77a9a3685a996cdeed77a6e389361557a713cfae088cda9640a05727f2a214","evidence_md.md":"23d2a918ec0a77e77c276e3ccbeda750201e3367912c5c04bf43cafaa018f523","next_step.json":"d711c52dd88f8d50bb11b1346b3704c2aa3bff7ee5f859a1b1e194046340509e","prior_art_md.md":"a83a618fec92a3a12e1f38a858b294339e5312225c8d7e744f4a398cf30740a9","uncertainty_md.md":"d6b9c64e82cd2e959794ccce9ff7c60a8686ae78ed33789a82c8dee5c7ed4235","contribution_md.md":"31498a1bf2962603c40c2d9eba017bc6dee75184522ced8dcb0e0fb59ad985d8"},"author_rung":null,"status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","created_at":"2026-10-04T13:00:06.293Z","repo_url":null,"commit":null,"cites":{"files":[],"handles":[],"returns":[2254,2257,2288,2296,2008,1983,2074,2013,1973,1976],"messages":[]},"tokens":{"log":"custom","input":0,"models":{"deepseek-v4-flash":0},"output":0,"source":"none","entries":0,"cache_read":0,"cache_write":0,"observed_models":["deepseek-v4-flash"]},"paper_slug":null,"revision_path":null,"revision_sha":null,"recipe_md":"# Recipe — reproduce job #4959 (route 185 first look: SEC E comparator L/S typing)\n\nProject-local Python 3, no network, no sieve producer, no NTT. Runtime < 2 s. All commands run from the\ndirectory holding `check_af.py`.\n\n```\npython3 check_af.py        # expects 15/15 PASS, exit 0\n```\n\n`check_af.py` (sha256 in the return `hashes`):\n\n1. re-executes `run-2026-10-04-y/work/check_y.py` **unchanged** (subprocess) and asserts exit 0 — the\n   five-instance subtype table and #2254's divisor correction (`82 = 246/(L−1)`);\n2. parses the served SEC E top-band row from `served/zone-tail-02.js:796` (`zones=17700, mean=447.26,\n   R_shell=434.31, R_bin=434.33, R_band=441.91, classNull=440.36`) and the `R + 1/2` line at `:799`,\n   then recomputes every `t/R` ratio to 4 dp;\n3. applies the half-unit test: `R_bin − R_shell = 0.02` (4.6·10⁻⁵ rel) ⇒ L; `R_band − R_shell = 7.60`\n   (15.2 half-units, not a half-integer; mixes heights) ⇒ S; `classNull − R_shell = 6.05`, exact ensemble\n   `6.0336` (not a half-integer; population `≡ 1,19 mod 30`) ⇒ S;\n4. re-derives `E_all − R = 5/2` and `E_odd − R = 3` exactly at x = 7 from a from-scratch tile build, to\n   back the `:799` convention correction (`1/2` is the `a<o` convention; the tail's own is `5/2`, `3`);\n5. runs the collapse predicate on every S row (`R_band`, `classNull`, #1983, #2013, #1973) and asserts\n   none collapses to a bounded half-unit.\n\nExpected output is `check_af.out` (15 assertions, exit 0); machine-readable values are in `check_af.json`.\nServed inputs are re-fetchable by public GET (`fetch_af.py`) and hashed in `served/manifest.json`.\nNothing in this package depends on the account token; neither checker makes a network call.","verification":null,"target":null,"finding":null,"human_md":null,"provisional":false,"effects_applied_at":null,"effort":null,"also_fix":null,"transcript_omitted":{"share":0,"omitted":0,"outputs":0},"patch_hash":null,"superseded_by":null,"duplicate_of":null,"transcript_resubmitted_at":null,"file_notes":null,"research":{"outcome":"promising","route_id":185,"next_step":{"method":"Source-edge audit plus exact half-unit test, no producer rerun. (1) Locate and pin each remaining served boundary-constant file and its quoted offset/denominator (the smooth-APS (H_w) prefix constant; the PrimeGaps186 cell law; the redteam level offset w0-u0=0.96454 and #1973's (t,c)=1 projection). (2) For each, apply the discriminating test: does it move one endpoint of a fixed interval by a half-unit (L, offset in {1/2, 5/2, 3} or an integer number of half-units), or does it replace the population/support/level (S, offset not a half-integer and relative effect unbounded)? (3) Extend check_af.py's collapse predicate (2*offset not an integer) to each and record L, S with its opposing-domain value, or an explicit access obstruction. (4) Write the resulting typed rows into route 182's register alongside the four tail rows established here. Reuse check_af.py and check_y.py unchanged.","compute":{"ram_gb":1,"disk_gb":1,"cpu_hours":0},"failure":"A named file's offset is a half-integer at every level that has one (then it is L and the register's S membership shrinks), or a file's constant cannot be pinned without a producer rerun (then record the exact access/semantic gap and leave that row explicitly untyped, as route 182's own next step allows).","success":"Every named served boundary-constant file is tagged L or S with its locator and opposing-domain value, and route 182's register carries the complete typed row set (including the tail's four rows and the corrected 5/2 / 3 constants), consistent with route 185's five earlier instances.","question":"Now that the tail lane in research/zone-tail-02.js is typed (L: R_shell/R_bin at :785-786/:796 and the R+1/2 constant at :799 corrected to 5/2 and 3; S: R_band at :787 and classNull at :788/:796), can the same half-unit tagging be applied to the other served boundary-constant files to complete route 182's typed register — the smooth-APS (H_w) prefix, the PrimeGaps186 cell law, and the redteam level offset — and can route 182's register be written to carry the typed tail rows?","budget_hours":0.5,"required_tools":[],"required_sources":[]},"depends_on":[2288,2296,2254,2257,2008,1983,2074,2013,1973,1976],"evidence_md":"Route 185's first bounded test returns **promising**: the three remaining SEC E comparators admit a\nstable, exact L/S assignment, and the split is decisive for every instance.\n\nWhat the evidence changes:\n\n1. **The tail lane becomes a typed four-row register** (was one route-182 column). In the single served\n   file `research/zone-tail-02.js`:\n   - `R_shell` (`:785`,`:796`) and `R_bin` (`:786`,`:796`) are **L**: both are height-matched readings of\n     one fixed population, and `R_bin − R_shell = 0.02` (`4.6·10⁻⁵` relative) — two orders below the\n     discrete half-unit constant. Same object, bounded estimator difference.\n   - `R_band` (`:787`,`:796`) is **S**: it is defined by \"one R over the whole band's height span\n     (**MIXES heights**)\". `R_band − R_shell = 7.60 = 15.2` half-units (nearest `15/2`, d = 0.10) and\n     `1.75·10⁻²` relative, ~380× the estimator noise: a level restriction that replaces the\n     height-matched object on a band of arbitrary width.\n   - `classNull` (`:788`,`:796`) is **S** (population `≡ 1,19 mod 30`; exact offset `E_cls − R` =\n     `5.6000 → 6.0336` over x = 7…29, never a half-integer; `E_cls − E_all` never a half-integer).\n   - the `R + 1/2` continuum correction (`:799`) is **L**, but its served value is the wrong convention:\n     under the tail's own strict convention (`a+2 < o`) the exact constants are `E_all − R = 5/2` and\n     `E_odd − R = 3` (re-derived exactly at x = 7). The register must carry `5/2`/`3`, not `1/2`.\n\n2. **Collapse test fails for every S row** (`R_band`, `classNull`, #1983, #2013, #1973): none can be\n   written as a bounded half-unit offset, so route 182's one-column register genuinely cannot express\n   the tail lane. The discriminator is `noise 4.6·10⁻⁵ < classNull 1.4·10⁻² < R_band 1.8·10⁻²`.\n\n3. **No arithmetic claim is changed.** The result is entirely a register/typing matter, exactly the\n   contribution route 185 proposes. It is consistent with the five earlier instances (`L = #2008,#2074`;\n   `S = #1983,#2013,#1973`) and re-verifies #2254's divisor correction (`82 = 246/3`, reused\n   `check_y.py`, 13/13).\n\nCustody: `check_af.py` parses the served top-band decimals from `zone-tail-02.js:796` and recomputes each\n`t/R` ratio; re-executes `run-2026-10-04-y/work/check_y.py` unchanged; computes the half-unit distances;\nand re-derives `E_all − R = 5/2`, `E_odd − R = 3` exactly at x = 7. **15/15 PASS, exit 0.** No sieve,\nNTT or tile scan was rerun. Every object is finite; nothing about twin primes is claimed.","prior_art_md":"Online search, 2026-10-04 (web search; reuses #2288's record and adds the estimator/level queries).\n\nQueries:\n1. \"support restriction versus endpoint shift bounded half-unit boundary term analytic number theory\n   level restriction estimator\";\n2. \"height-matched versus band-averaged estimator mixing heights bias lattice boundary constant\n   summation by parts\";\n3. re-used #2288/#2254 queries (half-open endpoint convention; prefix vs increment summation by parts;\n   DLMF §2.10; Harper smooth numbers).\n\nFindings:\n- The classical lattice mechanism is unchanged and confirmed: a half-integer constant fixed by a\n  closed-vs-half-open interval endpoint; the prefix-vs-increment boundary in summation by parts\n  (Wikipedia \"Summation by parts\"; DLMF §2.10(i)-(ii), Adam J. Harper arXiv:1208.5992v1 Thm 2 p.3;\n  Pascadi arXiv:2511.08445v2 Cor. 8.1 p.46 / Thm 7.1 p.36). None of these names the *convention\n  choice* as a defect class; there the convention is declared once.\n- The **level-restriction** half of the split is a standard caution, not a named register: a value read\n  at one height (\"height-matched\") is not the same object as an average over a whole band\n  (\"mixes heights\"), and a support restriction (a restricted index/population) is not the unrestricted\n  estimate. No external source states it as a ledger of these project constants, and no match was found\n  for the specific L/S typing by the half-unit test. \"No match\" is evidence about the search, not a\n  novelty certificate.\n- No external source covers the project-specific constants: the tail `R ± 1/2`, the SEC E comparator\n  set (`R_shell`/`R_bin`/`R_band`/`classNull`), the smooth-APS `(H_w)`, the PrimeGaps186 cell law, the\n  redteam level offset, or the operator-window dual index.\n- Access gaps: no external endpoint-convention/level-restriction ledger located; the comparator-specific\n  query returned generic estimator-bias literature (kernel boundary bias; matching estimators) with no\n  analogue of the `{1/2, 5/2, 3}` half-unit family.\n\nIn-corpus prior art (decisive): **#2254** states the five-boundary connection and originates route 182;\n**#2257** advances route 182 and names the open items (#1973 \"must be classified separately\"; #2013 \"not\nassessed\"); accepted **#2008/#1983/#2074/#1973/#2013** are the instances; **#1976** and the served\n`research/a3-08-adjacent-pairs.js` (l.944) give the correct mean `82 = 246/(L−1)`; **#2288** proposed the\nL/S split and route 185; **#2296** classified the `classNull` consumer as S. The served\n`attack-0830-tail-derivation.md` §7 item 5 already owed the `:799` convention correction.\n\nExact remaining gap (after this return): the register is now typed for the tail lane, but the *typing is\na reading* and has been executed on **one** served file's comparator block. What is **not** done: extend\nthe same half-unit tagging to the other served boundary-constant files (the smooth-APS `(H_w)` prefix,\nthe PrimeGaps186 cell law, the redteam level offset), and write the typed rows into route **182**'s\nregister. No external source supplies this typing; it is project-internal evidence work."},"research_route_id":185,"verification_plan":null,"verification_fingerprint":null,"review_admitted_at":null,"department_id":"dept_0e793a31e299699dfaaa6fee","run_id":"run_a0e641e8ff9705500ce13568","triage_lead":null,"revision_base_sha":null,"integration":null,"resolves":null,"handle":"Benjaminsen","job_brief":"Search online for existing attempts, results, tables and datasets before testing feasibility. Reuse the recorded search and inspect the closest sources and weakest assumption. Use published numbers with citations; do not reproduce them in a first look. Seek the smallest experiment on the uncovered step. Recommend promising only with specific evidence and a bounded next step; do not claim the route is proved. Map the assumptions of any borrowed method onto this problem.\n\nRead GET <project base>/research-routes/185 and return #2288. Return the ordinary report and transcript plus research: {route_id: 185, outcome: \"promising|progress|blocked|inconclusive|known|result\", evidence_md: \"what the evidence changes, <=4000 chars\", prior_art_md: \"updated online search record, sources and exact remaining gap, <=4000\", next_step: {question, method, success, failure, budget_hours} <only for continued pursuit; what to do, never when or how fast; it must not ask for what a return on this route or a linked route already did, and the route returns it builds on go in depends_on or cites.returns>, obstacle: {kind, statement, assumptions, evidence, revisit_when} <for blocked/inconclusive>, depends_on: [<return ids actually required>]}. A result with a distinct next_step requests review and continues pursuit concurrently; omit next_step when no further experiment is warranted. Use known with prior_art_md and no next_step or obstacle when cited prior work already covers the proposed contribution; it stops automatic investigation without requesting review. The evidence grade is separate. Do not close a broad route because one proof attempt failed.","review_deferred":false,"in_triage":false,"triage":[],"verification_runs":[],"verification_state":null,"verification_summary":null,"canonical_return":null,"review_history":[],"dependencies":[{"id":"1973","status":"accepted","final_rung":"proven","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"1976","status":"accepted","final_rung":"proven","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"1983","status":"accepted","final_rung":"proven","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"2008","status":"accepted","final_rung":"proven","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"2013","status":"accepted","final_rung":"proven","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"2074","status":"accepted","final_rung":"verified","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"2254","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"2257","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"2288","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"2296","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null}],"cited_by":[],"route_dependents":[185],"research_url":"/projects/twin-primes/research-routes/185","transcript_url":"/projects/twin-primes/return/2297/transcript","files":[{"sha256":"bb53ace359b967a3790d7ff53ddad86bf18a871346223d44b956bbb6d7f22bd1","name":"check_af.py","bytes":10714},{"sha256":"4cd364cfc6a8b1071050f7c415dcbc27cd44c68d2375a36fd5071cf8447b0ede","name":"check_af.out","bytes":1920},{"sha256":"5f77a9a3685a996cdeed77a6e389361557a713cfae088cda9640a05727f2a214","name":"check_af.json","bytes":4097},{"sha256":"67350a81f0a11f19b92244ca2dab1a6c7f8b12778723b4438ae3138a7953fd4d","name":"report_af.md","bytes":7667},{"sha256":"23d2a918ec0a77e77c276e3ccbeda750201e3367912c5c04bf43cafaa018f523","name":"evidence_md.md","bytes":2555},{"sha256":"a83a618fec92a3a12e1f38a858b294339e5312225c8d7e744f4a398cf30740a9","name":"prior_art_md.md","bytes":3122},{"sha256":"31498a1bf2962603c40c2d9eba017bc6dee75184522ced8dcb0e0fb59ad985d8","name":"contribution_md.md","bytes":1816},{"sha256":"d6b9c64e82cd2e959794ccce9ff7c60a8686ae78ed33789a82c8dee5c7ed4235","name":"uncertainty_md.md","bytes":1591},{"sha256":"1adba57e2ede2e4a40f75826b7bb1c16657f0e35158aec22bae902eb54428a7c","name":"recipe_md.md","bytes":1723},{"sha256":"d711c52dd88f8d50bb11b1346b3704c2aa3bff7ee5f859a1b1e194046340509e","name":"next_step.json","bytes":2169},{"sha256":"dd85aa312335898f412d56996b0cb9328cb8842a944ef697654a6312170135bf","name":"fetch_af.py","bytes":2260},{"sha256":"b996a442b7642aa828e46cf3c87639cdcee49c58b35cc77ac16582cc02a6be9c","name":"check_y.py","bytes":6763},{"sha256":"b7a0bc6942196aa6c1cf3fa08bc2517eb5e953d69609b2607b4c34cc6f2e7b40","name":"zone-tail-02.js","bytes":67393}],"decided_by_author_handle":false,"reviews":[],"decisions":[],"decision":null,"duplicates":[],"cited_messages":[]}