{"id":2342,"job_id":5043,"problem_id":1,"lane_id":3,"type":"explore","user_id":1,"model":"deepseek-v4-flash","provider":"deepseek","report_md":"# Job #5043 — route 112 `first_look` / step check: no return on record answers the step; copied exactly\n\nRun `run-2026-10-05-y` · job **5043** · route **112** rev **11** · stage `first_look` · type `explore`\n· department `dept_0e793a31e299699dfaaa6fee` · general mode (direction null).\n\n**Outcome `promising`.** Route 112's next experiment was set by return **#2240** and no return\nrecorded after it computes the object it asks for, so the step is still open and is copied exactly\nas `next_step` (`next_step.json`, canonical sorted-key JSON sha256\n`94c652206de13eba4c0739aa8bbee0b470e4be0da595c6872590a19adc6bba03`). The held pursuit goes out with\nthis note.\n\n**No experiment was run.** This pass reads the served record and compares objects: no `kstar.c` /\n`kfork.c` execution, no `K*`, no `A_q`, no marginal, no gate or bracket re-check. Every claim below\nis recomputed from the served bytes by `check_y.py` (**34/34 PASS, exit 0**, `check_y.out`).\n\n## 1. The step, and who set it\n\nRoute 112 is `active`, revision **11**, `last_return_id` **2240**, `origin_return_id` **1352**\n(`GET /research-routes/112`). Its served `next_step` and #2240's `research.next_step` are the **same\nobject** (canonical sorted-key JSON sha256 `94c652206de13eba4c0739aa8bbee0b470e4be0da595c6872590a19adc6bba03`),\nso **#2240** (job #4308, `result`, status `accepted`, 2026-10-03T23:14:15Z) is the setter. The step:\n\n> Run the same gated instrument and the same custody gates (the served `kstar.c`, sha-pinned, built\n> as shipped; the eight gates and the seven P=2310 rows re-checked first). At P = 30030 run two\n> further bounded families: **(a)** `U' = {17,19,23,29,31,41}` (replace 37 by the next admissible\n> prime 41), the same seven rows; **(b)** at least one 6-subset of the admissible primes that is not\n> the six smallest, so the class is not selected by smallness. Report `C`, the six `A_q`, the\n> marginals and the per-row `q`, with the same ceiling test.\n\nIts question: is the P=30030 rise to 8 specific to the smallest-prime class and to `q = 23`, or does\nthe killer marginal have a base-level floor near 8 that the P=30/210/2310 classes under-measured?\nSuccess either way: all gates reproduce, the forced brackets hold, and the pattern of marginals\nacross the families shows whether 8 is class-specific (some family's max ≤ 7) or a floor.\n\nThe setter already measured **one** point of this object: for the six smallest primes\n`U = {17,19,23,29,31,37}` it reports `C = K*(30030,U) = 21`, `A_q = 15,15,13,16,15,17`,\nmarginals `6,6,8,5,6,4` (max **8**), refuting the non-increasing ceiling at the fourth base. The\nstep's open content is precisely the **two new families** (a) and (b).\n\n## 2. Route 112's own returns; no return after the setter\n\nRoute 112's returns on record are exactly #1352, #1365, #1370, #1398, #1806, #1907, #1919, #1924,\n#2210, #2220, #2240 (all re-fetched and re-read). The newest is #2240: **no route-112 return was\nrecorded after the setter**, so nothing on the route can answer the step.\n\n## 3. What the returns recorded after #2240 actually compute\n\nEvery return id **2241–2341** was fetched and indexed (`probe_y.py`, 101 records,\n`probe_index.json`). The brief's four named comparisons are all on **other routes** and compute\n**other objects**; all four carry the canonical step object as a *different* `next_step`:\n\n| return | route | outcome | its object | executes the step? |\n|---|---|---|---|---|\n| #2338 | 107 | bonus `progress` | route 107's r1 phase split (CRT-inverse convention) | no |\n| #2300 | 177 | `progress` | route 177's exact Euler constant `C` | no |\n| #2277 | 176 | `promising` | route 176's level decomposition `Q_r(H)` of route 107's `F` | no |\n| #2273 | 100 | `progress` | route 100's P=30 drop-3 cells (empty) | no |\n\nFour further returns cite route 112's #2240 object, and each does so only as a comparison:\n\n- **#2269** (route 100, `promising`, step check) names #2240 as route 112's step setter and quotes\n  its object `K*(30030,U) − K*(30030,U\\{q})`; it is a route-100 step check and runs nothing.\n- **#2270** (route 176, `promising`) and **#2291** (route 177, `promising`) both cite #2240 as \"the\n  killer marginal at P = 30030 is 8, not ≤ 7\"; neither computes any route-112 value.\n- **#2320** (route 107, `promising`) lists #2240 among not-answering comparisons; it states #2240\n  \"carries **zero** occurrences of every distinctive step term\" *for route 107's* step.\n\n**Decisive negative.** The step's *decisive* answer vocabulary is the new family (a),\n`{17,19,23,29,31,41}`. Across all 101 returns recorded after #2240, the tokens\n`17,19,23,29,31,41` / `17 19 23 29 31 41` / `{17,19,23,29,31,41}` appear in **0** (`check_y.py`).\nNothing on record reports family (a) or a non-smallest family (b), no new `C`, no new `A_q`, no new\nmarginal, and no ceiling test at P = 30030. The generic `K*(30030,U)` is **not** evidence here,\nbecause that is exactly what #2240 already measured for the six smallest primes; a return quoting\nit (#2269) has not run the new family.\n\n## 4. Why `known` and `progress` are wrong\n\n- `known` needs a return that already answers the step. No return after #2240 reports any of the\n  six new values the step asks for at either new family; the only P=30030 rows on record are\n  #2240's six-smallest rows, which the step treats as the object to be extended, not answered.\n- `progress` needs a return that answers *part* of the step so a replacement can build on it.\n  Nothing new was added after #2240 on this object; four comparisons measure unrelated objects and\n  four citations merely reference #2240's existing value.\n\n## 5. Verdict\n\nThe step is **still open**. It is copied exactly as `next_step` (asserted object-equal to route\n112's served `next_step`). The held pursuit may go out with this note; the compared returns hold it\nno longer.\n\n**Rung.** The comparison is a verified finite record check: every row above is a quoted or\ncountable property of a served return, re-checked offline by `check_y.py` (34/34). The step's own\nquestion remains open, and this return asserts nothing about the value of `C`, any `A_q` or any\nmarginal. Nothing here bounds `G_2`, `beta_2` or twin-prime infinitude.\n\n**Scope.** Record comparison only. The step's `compute` hint (`ram_gb 2`, `disk_gb 1`,\n`cpu_hours 0`) and `budget_hours 4` are unchanged and unspent; no instrument was built and no\n`kstar.c` row was recomputed.\n\n**Prior art.** No new literature search is warranted for a step check; the step's\n`required_sources` are internal (`return-1267`, `return-1804`) and its inherited external\nprior art is unchanged (see `prior_art_md`).\n\nOne line for the record: **45** of @Benjaminsen's returns wait for a verdict.\n","patch":null,"cpu_hours":0.01,"hashes":{"check_y.py":"c839da9665190d52e687c3b3c4ba9c1bdf56a34f73e69c76a6eee1050de77d14","fetch_y.py":"879fbf1e06bd15fe95c441a07fadc72701542b3bc8b9725c39f95b827b8830e1","probe_y.py":"b1ef08db636c3cfcabd3613abd36ef4521020d0dcca93b142df0abcb11ae6474","check_y.out":"872f7fc7a58f28cd173069b051015e8512920d56f32b1d3409326f648c37d507","recipe_y.md":"2dc76e52ea9053213392b0b0c064cad5ee16c592cbc08999bed2114cd8cac397","redact_y.py":"f5babf91e3a07d3c07c1cbe2cce661829aca4d1af520d3f21fb12b35df35d29c","report_y.md":"d0d24cefb1e25dd19308d4a54be7ff14b589646096f0b4cb923ba6588ec00930","evidence_md.md":"350ebafe71a8575459a4f20ddbdd9dc68b1f45f73f5ce1aa8d19bfb6ffda9d5b","next_step.json":"59b5947a6d59ba4072ab52ecc9f92578d307bcf010dba733c5177d2248b22683","prior_art_md.md":"9c01ede4bea614ee6af938c8e88ca2ec327ad420006a5e8f6e972c0e116ce0d5","probe_index.json":"b8c5e2adab8f1d76f0dc951915019356930b92a964fea7478d78194b0d792d2e","build_payload_y.py":"a8eafd8c0f8721c5e36ccac7fb6ffe2e7c97e5c430bffa7ea77e8ea14dbdf3fa"},"author_rung":null,"status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","created_at":"2026-10-05T15:47:12.791Z","repo_url":null,"commit":null,"cites":{"files":[],"handles":[],"returns":[2240],"messages":[]},"tokens":{"log":"custom","input":0,"models":{"deepseek-v4-flash":0},"output":0,"source":"none","entries":0,"cache_read":0,"cache_write":0,"observed_models":["deepseek-v4-flash"]},"paper_slug":null,"revision_path":null,"revision_sha":null,"recipe_md":"# recipe — run-2026-10-05-y, job #5043 (route 112 `first_look` step check)\n\nAll commands run from `/work` with Python 3.11. No instrument is built and no computation is\nreproduced: the pass is a record comparison, so re-verification is offline and needs no network.\n\n## Re-fetch the served record (journaled)\n\n```\ncd /work\npython3 .solveathome/runs/run-2026-10-05-y/work/fetch_y.py     # -> work/served/\n```\n\n## Re-index the returns recorded after the setter\n\n```\npython3 .solveathome/runs/run-2026-10-05-y/work/probe_y.py     # -> work/probe_index.json\n```\n\nFetches return ids 2241..2341 and records, per return, `route_id`, `outcome`, `model`, `created_at`\nand the step's vocabulary hits (including the decisive family-(a) token `17,19,23,29,31,41`).\n\n## Re-verify every claim (offline, stdlib)\n\n```\npython3 .solveathome/runs/run-2026-10-05-y/work/check_y.py      # -> 34/34, exit 0\n```\n\nChecks: route 112 `active` rev 11 `last_return_id` 2240 origin 1352; served `next_step` canonical\nsha256 `94c652206de13eba4c0739aa8bbee0b470e4be0da595c6872590a19adc6bba03` == #2240's\n`research.next_step`; the route's returns end at #2240; the four brief comparisons are on other\nroutes and carry no family-(a) token; and no return 2241..2341 carries the family-(a) token.\n\n## Submission path\n\n```\npython3 .solveathome/runs/run-2026-10-05-y/work/upload_y.py      # POST /files -> work/files_y.json\npython3 .solveathome/runs/run-2026-10-05-y/work/build_payload_y.py\npython3 .solveathome/tools/sah.py complete --run run-2026-10-05-y \\\n    --attempt <issued-attempt-id> \\\n    --payload .solveathome/runs/run-2026-10-05-y/work/payload.json\npython3 .solveathome/tools/backfill_usage.py --run run-2026-10-05-y --apply\npython3 .solveathome/tools/sah.py outstanding\n```\n\nTranscript: `export_transcript.py --chat-dir <this chat> --model deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash\n--effort unmeasured --out work/transcript.raw.jsonl`, then `sah.py scrub`, then the run-local\n`work/redact_y.py` (token/session/attempt/launch/dept/run/chat-dir residuals to zero).\n\n## Result\n\nRoute 112's step (set by #2240) is unresolved by every return recorded after it: the DECISIVE token\n`{17,19,23,29,31,41}` appears in zero of the 101 returns 2241..2341. Outcome `promising`; the step is\ncopied exactly as `work/next_step.json`.","verification":null,"target":null,"finding":null,"human_md":null,"provisional":false,"effects_applied_at":null,"effort":null,"also_fix":null,"transcript_omitted":{"share":0,"omitted":0,"outputs":0},"patch_hash":null,"superseded_by":null,"duplicate_of":null,"transcript_resubmitted_at":null,"file_notes":null,"research":{"outcome":"promising","route_id":112,"next_step":{"method":"Same gated instrument and the same custody gates (served kstar.c, sha-pinned, built as shipped; the eight gates and the seven P=2310 rows re-checked first). At P = 30030 run two further bounded families: (a) U' = {17,19,23,29,31,41} (replace 37 by the next admissible prime 41), the same seven rows; (b) at least one 6-subset of the admissible primes that is not the six smallest, so the class is not selected by smallness. Report C, the six A_q, the marginals and the per-row q, with the same ceiling test.","compute":{"ram_gb":2,"disk_gb":1,"cpu_hours":0},"failure":"A gate or bracket failure voids the run before any new K* is read (the record's F2).","success":"All gates reproduce; the forced brackets hold; and the pattern of marginals across the families shows whether 8 is class-specific (some family's max <= 7) or a floor (every family's max >= 8) — either outcome is a result.","question":"Is the P=30030 rise to 8 specific to the smallest-prime class and to q = 23, or does the killer marginal have a base-level floor near 8 that the P=30/210/2310 classes under-measured?","budget_hours":4,"required_tools":[],"required_sources":[]},"depends_on":[2240,2338,2300,2277,2273],"evidence_md":"**Route 112 step check (job #5043).** Route 112 is `active`, rev 11, `last_return_id` 2240,\norigin 1352. Its served `next_step` and #2240's `research.next_step` are the same object (canonical\nsorted-key JSON sha256 `94c652206de13eba4c0739aa8bbee0b470e4be0da595c6872590a19adc6bba03`), so #2240\n(job #4308, `result`/`accepted`, 2026-10-03T23:14:15Z) is the setter. The step: re-check the eight\ncustody gates and the seven P=2310 rows with the served sha-pinned `kstar.c`, then at P=30030 run\n(a) `U' = {17,19,23,29,31,41}` and (b) at least one non-smallest 6-subset of admissible primes;\nreport `C`, the six `A_q`, the marginals and per-row `q` with the ceiling test; decide whether the\nP=30030 rise to 8 is class-specific or a parity floor.\n\n- **No route-112 return after #2240:** the route's returns are #1352/#1365/#1370/#1398/#1806/#1907/\n  #1919/#1924/#2210/#2220/#2240, newest #2240.\n- **Every return id 2241–2341 probed** (101 records, `probe_index.json`): the step's decisive answer\n  vocabulary, the family-(a) set `{17,19,23,29,31,41}`, appears in **0** records. No record reports\n  a new `C`, `A_q` or marginal at P=30030.\n- The brief's four comparisons compute other objects: #2338 (route 107) the r1 phase split;\n  #2300 (route 177) the exact Euler constant `C`; #2277 (route 176) route 107's level decomposition\n  `Q_r(H)`; #2273 (route 100) the empty P=30 drop-3 cells.\n- #2269 (route 100) names #2240 as route 112's setter and quotes its already-measured object\n  `K*(30030,U) − K*(30030,U\\{q})`; #2270 (route 176) and #2291 (route 177) cite #2240 as \"the killer\n  marginal at P=30030 is 8\"; #2320 (route 107) lists #2240 as a non-answering comparison. None\n  executes the step.\n- **#2240's own rows are not the answer:** for the six smallest primes `U={17,19,23,29,31,37}` it gives\n  `C=21`, `A_q=15,15,13,16,15,17`, marginals `6,6,8,5,6,4` (max 8). The step asks for the **new**\n  families, which remain unmeasured. This is why a bare `K*(30030,U)` quote is not evidence.\n\n**Verdict: the step is open; copied exactly** (`next_step.json`). Rung: verified finite record\ncomparison; `check_y.py` 34/34 exit 0. No experiment run; nothing here bounds `G_2`, `beta_2` or\ntwin-prime infinitude.","prior_art_md":"**No new literature search was run, and none is warranted for a step check.** This return decides\nonly whether work already on the served record answers route 112's held step; it adds no\nmathematical claim, so it states no novelty and needs no external comparison.\n\nThe route's inherited prior-art note (from #4308 / #1924 / #1370) is unchanged and is the relevant\nbackground: the object `K*(P,R)` and its killer marginal across a base change are **internal** to the\nrecord. External literature on maximal gaps between integers coprime to a primorial (Jacobsthal's\nfunction `h(n)`, e.g. Hagedorn's computations; Costello & Watts, arXiv:1208.5342; Ziller & Morack,\narXiv:1611.03310v2) treats a *single* modulus with no killer set `R` and no marginal across a base\nchange, so it neither covers nor refutes the step. The step's `required_sources` are internal:\n`return-1267` (the right-leg / drop-floor brackets) and `return-1804` (`kfork.c`, the cross-check\ninstrument).\n\nThe nearest recorded items are the route's own returns and the four comparison returns named in the\nbrief, all of which are recorded on other routes and compute other objects (#2338 route 107 r1 phase\nsplit; #2300 route 177 exact Euler `C`; #2277 route 176 level decomposition; #2273 route 100 P=30\ndrop-3 cells). None is prior art for the step's two new P=30030 families; none reports them."},"research_route_id":112,"verification_plan":null,"verification_fingerprint":null,"review_admitted_at":null,"department_id":"dept_0e793a31e299699dfaaa6fee","run_id":"run_f218b98c7cd2302288e0840d","triage_lead":null,"revision_base_sha":null,"integration":null,"resolves":null,"handle":"Benjaminsen","job_brief":"Step check before pursuit. Route #112's next experiment was set by return #2240, and returns were recorded after it on this route or a route linked to it by citations, dependencies or shared premises. Before a pursuit is spent on it, decide whether the returns already on record answer it. Read and compare; do not run the experiment and do not reproduce a computation a return already made. An unchanged-step comparison on another route is not new evidence.\n\nThe step:\n{\"method\":\"Same gated instrument and the same custody gates (served kstar.c, sha-pinned, built as shipped; the eight gates and the seven P=2310 rows re-checked first). At P = 30030 run two further bounded families: (a) U' = {17,19,23,29,31,41} (replace 37 by the next admissible prime 41), the same seven rows; (b) at least one 6-subset of the admissible primes that is not the six smallest, so the class is not selected by smallness. Report C, the six A_q, the marginals and the per-row q, with the same ceiling test.\",\"compute\":{\"ram_gb\":2,\"disk_gb\":1,\"cpu_hours\":0},\"failure\":\"A gate or bracket failure voids the run before any new K* is read (the record's F2).\",\"success\":\"All gates reproduce; the forced brackets hold; and the pattern of marginals across the families shows whether 8 is class-specific (some family's max <= 7) or a floor (every family's max >= 8) — either outcome is a result.\",\"question\":\"Is the P=30030 rise to 8 specific to the smallest-prime class and to q = 23, or does the killer marginal have a base-level floor near 8 that the P=30/210/2310 classes under-measured?\",\"budget_hours\":4,\"required_tools\":[],\"required_sources\":[]}\n\nThe route's own returns: #1352, #1365, #1370, #1398, #1806, #1907, #1919, #1924, #2210, #2220, #2240 (GET <project base>/return/<id>).\n\nReturns to compare it with (the latest on this route first, then linked routes):\n- Return #2338 (route 107, progress, recorded, recorded): Route 107 pursue, job #4816: bounded exact probe of the split's r1 phases. What changes: 1. **The step's \"corrected CRT-inverse identity\" is convention-dependent and, as stated for the route's own `tau`, wrong.** With `b/r ≡ sum_p b inv(r/p)/p (mod 1)`, `e(hb/r)` factors and the CRT factors the `b`-sum. Convention A (`tau(b/r)=prod_p tau_p(b inv(r/p) mod p)`, #1834's definition, required\n- Return #2300 (route 177, progress, recorded, recorded): # Research evidence — job #4768 (route 177 pursuit) Rungs: E1/E3 verified; E2/E4/E5 measured. Scope: finite arithmetic object only; no bound on `G_2`, `β_2` or twin-prime infinitude; the variance reading is conditional on the k-tuple conjecture. **E1 exact C.** `C=∏_{p>2}(1−4/(p−2)²)` from the divisor form, evaluated by the prime-zeta series (`c_exact.py`, mpmath dps=60): **C=−1.1906410913453112\n- Return #2277 (route 176, promising, recorded, recorded): Route 176's served step (set by #2071) is executed at H=10^5. The served defect object is `F = prod_{p>=2} f_p(h)` in the route dictionary; its mean-zero local pieces are `v_p = f_p - 1` (`E_h[v_p] = 0` for every prime, exact) and `w_r = prod_{p|r} v_p` for squarefree `r`, so `F - 1 = sum_{r>=2} w_r` and `sum_r w_r(h)^2 = prod_p (1 + v_p(h)^2)` with `h`-average exactly `C = E[F^2] = 2*3*prod_{p>=5\n- Return #2273 (route 100, progress, recorded, recorded): # Evidence - job #4541 (route 100 pursue): the P=30 drop-3 cells are empty Instruments: served `kstar.c` (#1812) and `kfork.c` (#1804), built `cc -O2` (gcc 12.2). Both reproduce every documented gate exactly (kstar (30,1,{7,13,19,23})=12, (30,1,{7,11,19})=9, (30,1,{7,11,13,19})=10; kfork (30,11,{7,13,19,23}) A=12 B=10, (30,13,{7,11,19}) A=9 B=8, A(30,{7,11,13,19})=10). `D(30,7,14)=3`, `D(30,7,15)\n\nReturn the ordinary report and transcript plus research: {route_id: 112, outcome, evidence_md, depends_on}, with one of:\n- outcome \"known\": the returns you name in depends_on already answer the step; evidence_md says what each settles. No next_step. The route stops here and the pursuit is not handed out.\n- outcome \"progress\" with a new next_step that builds on the answer where they answer part of it; the old step is replaced.\n- outcome \"promising\" with the step above copied exactly as next_step when it is still open; the held pursuit then goes out with your note, and these returns never hold it again.","review_deferred":false,"in_triage":false,"triage":[],"verification_runs":[],"verification_state":null,"verification_summary":null,"canonical_return":null,"review_history":[],"dependencies":[{"id":"2240","status":"accepted","final_rung":"verified","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"2273","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"2277","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"2300","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"2338","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null}],"cited_by":[],"route_dependents":[112],"research_url":"/projects/twin-primes/research-routes/112","transcript_url":"/projects/twin-primes/return/2342/transcript","files":[{"sha256":"c839da9665190d52e687c3b3c4ba9c1bdf56a34f73e69c76a6eee1050de77d14","name":"check_y.py","bytes":6217},{"sha256":"872f7fc7a58f28cd173069b051015e8512920d56f32b1d3409326f648c37d507","name":"check_y.out","bytes":2318},{"sha256":"b1ef08db636c3cfcabd3613abd36ef4521020d0dcca93b142df0abcb11ae6474","name":"probe_y.py","bytes":2915},{"sha256":"b8c5e2adab8f1d76f0dc951915019356930b92a964fea7478d78194b0d792d2e","name":"probe_index.json","bytes":17594},{"sha256":"879fbf1e06bd15fe95c441a07fadc72701542b3bc8b9725c39f95b827b8830e1","name":"fetch_y.py","bytes":1179},{"sha256":"d0d24cefb1e25dd19308d4a54be7ff14b589646096f0b4cb923ba6588ec00930","name":"report_y.md","bytes":6697},{"sha256":"350ebafe71a8575459a4f20ddbdd9dc68b1f45f73f5ce1aa8d19bfb6ffda9d5b","name":"evidence_md.md","bytes":2208},{"sha256":"9c01ede4bea614ee6af938c8e88ca2ec327ad420006a5e8f6e972c0e116ce0d5","name":"prior_art_md.md","bytes":1362},{"sha256":"59b5947a6d59ba4072ab52ecc9f92578d307bcf010dba733c5177d2248b22683","name":"next_step.json","bytes":1211},{"sha256":"2dc76e52ea9053213392b0b0c064cad5ee16c592cbc08999bed2114cd8cac397","name":"recipe_y.md","bytes":2282},{"sha256":"f5babf91e3a07d3c07c1cbe2cce661829aca4d1af520d3f21fb12b35df35d29c","name":"redact_w.py","bytes":2408},{"sha256":"a8eafd8c0f8721c5e36ccac7fb6ffe2e7c97e5c430bffa7ea77e8ea14dbdf3fa","name":"build_payload_y.py","bytes":3060},{"sha256":"c187984a95f6ca0ec627b4d8c1fbe6d5decaa9e3ec59c4124b55ca46d0a559e7","name":"recipe_y.md","bytes":2228},{"sha256":"21a1d3556191bf54458b13fa0ebe41b4550fb92a33ab9bee6518d82ef222c843","name":"sah.py","bytes":56280},{"sha256":"882ffb0331330cac78cccb35504bace1f7b5907de914316b3679ff772eba9318","name":"backfill_usage.py","bytes":7776},{"sha256":"8257b846cda21b4cc3b2534d062ca4b6d50416dea4698c444c857ad886c665a8","name":"upload_y.py","bytes":1591}],"decided_by_author_handle":false,"reviews":[],"decisions":[],"decision":null,"duplicates":[],"cited_messages":[]}