{"id":2442,"job_id":5190,"problem_id":1,"lane_id":3,"type":"explore","user_id":1,"model":"deepseek-v4-flash","provider":"deepseek","report_md":"# Job #5190 — route 2 first-look step check: the issued envelope step is answered in its decisive clause by the record, and only the exact L_e remains\n\n**Outcome `progress`.** This is a record comparison only. No experiment was run, no `fprofile`/`fastscan`\ninvoked, no numerical value computed and no published number recomputed (`cpu_hours 0`).\n\n## The issued step\n\nRoute **2** (\"Adaptive Bonferroni and chordal defect envelopes on prime-band windows\"), state `active`,\nrevision 11, `last_return_id 2365`. Its served `next_step` is byte-equal to #2365's `research.next_step`\n(canonical sorted-key compact UTF-8 JSON SHA-256\n`1531048843c4584711ac3275ed4d7ae8ecc15ed45f314ead3c73c164682841bb`). The step asks, at\n`W = 19# = 9699690` and the firing set `Q = {23,29,37,43}`:\n\n> where does the ENVELOPE certificate loss first become positive (`L_e`), and is `L_e <= L_F = 582`?\n\nIts success clause is \"`L_e` pinned as a single integer; if `L_e <= L_F` the envelope certificate also\nchanges a positivity verdict\"; its failure clause is \"`L_e > L_F`: the envelope certificate cannot change a\nverdict at T19 and only the chordal certificate does\".\n\n## What the returns on record settle\n\n**The decisive comparison is already answered NO by the record, without running the bisection.**\n\n1. **Envelope loss is nondecreasing in `L`.** #1795 (accepted/verified) proves it for every `(a, phase)`:\n   the support grows with `L`, and `exact`, each pair-only atom and the quadruple are counts of\n   pointwise-defined subsets of the support, hence each is nondecreasing in `L`; so are the envelope loss\n   `min(exact, min atom, quadruple)` and its maximum over all starts and phases.\n2. **The envelope loss is 0 at `L = L_F = 582` for the firing set.** #2253 (accepted/verified) scanned all\n   starts and run `starts_with_positive_loss = 0` for every one of the fifteen 4-subsets at its own `L_F`,\n   and states the envelope loss stays 0 everywhere for `Q = {23,29,37,43}` (`L_F = 582`). #2365 re-confirms\n   envelope loss 0 at `L = 433` for the same set (the chordal scan's witness has `quadruple = 0`).\n\nBy (1) and (2), `max envelope loss(L) = 0` for every `L <= 582`, so `L_e >= 583 > L_F = 582`. The step's\nfailure clause fires; the issued upward bisection can only return an integer above `L_F` and **changes no\nrouting decision**. The setter's own step text asserts both premises (\"envelope loss is 0 at\n`L = L_F = 582`\", \"the envelope loss ... is nondecreasing in `L`\"), so the comparison was answered the\nmoment the step was written; #2365's uncertainty note (which calls the envelope question \"open\") does not\ndraw that one-line deduction.\n\n## What the returns do not settle\n\n- **The exact integer `L_e`.** #2365 explicitly names \"the **envelope** onset `L_e` for the firing set is\n  unmeasured\"; no return before or after it measures it at this wheel/Q. #2009's `L_e = 1705` is the\n  *natural* T19 set `Q = {23,29,31,37}` (a different object), and #1795's `L_e = 1243` is 17#.\n- **The criterion itself.** The step uses the sufficient proxy `L_e <= L_F`; the route's real\n  verdict-changing condition is a positive certificate loss at a length where the first-order bound is\n  nonpositive (`min_a F < 0`). #2009 records that `min_a F(a,L)` is **not** monotone in `L` (at T19 it\n  drops at `L = 1`, 60, 150), so `L_e > L_F` alone does not by itself exclude a later verdict-changing\n  length. That stronger question is genuinely open.\n\n## Post-setter record\n\nA probe of every return id `2366..2441` (76 records) finds **zero** route-2 returns. The two returns the\nbrief names as comparators are route 197 and settle nothing here:\n\n- **#2375** (route 197, `known`): the additive-energy excess of the twin-admissible set is a fixed wheel\n  constant with an explicit Euler product; it cites route 2's onset work only as background. No `L_e`,\n  no 19# envelope computation.\n- **#2366** (route 197, `proposed`): cites `#2253/#2359/#2365` as a catalogue item (\"the chordal/envelope\n  certificate loss (route 2, ...)\") while computing an additive-energy Euler product. It performs no route-2\n  computation.\n\nThe previous route-2 step check **#2359** returned `promising` because nothing was settled then; the\nmissing chordal scans and the `[426,450]` bracket it recorded have since been closed by #2365 (`L_c = 433`,\ncensus complete), so its reasoning does not carry over.\n\n## Verdict\n\nThe record answers the step's decisive clause (`L_e > L_F`, so the envelope certificate is not the lever at\nT19) but not its stated integer deliverable, nor the stronger verdict-changing criterion. The issued step\nis therefore replaced by a sharper one (`next_step`): pin the exact `L_e` and test the true\n`min_a F < 0` conjunction using the served `fprofile.c`/`fastscan.c`, reusing #2365's `L_c = 433` and the\nfifteen-subset census rather than repeating them. Scope: this route's issued step and the current route\nrecord; no global census, no novelty search, no asymptotic claim.\n","patch":null,"cpu_hours":0,"hashes":{"scan_ca.py":"309785525429cccaabfc2c5095aaf992d6a8caa79f640a8cad8716108b1649d9","check_ca.py":"939d494346efeb7736d93bb2e3e823cbab45eee1730b0c160bc68dfeef7222b7","fetch_ca.py":"b632d215ec7a966ceb902839687cd21683682e398636dae516c36e004f295774","check_ca.out":"cc7a4499ba7bf692fcdadd2898e707d50d5f1fba0b81dc6d88b4090a82faece8","recipe_ca.md":"3f2e5c70c8c834928d49168e90aa07c788cfa4ab8860caf9c731ae9d2f737a63","report_ca.md":"37f323af146a23adae580a9c0dd4e8235674a5a40c6fe2a3053541eeded92c32","scan_ca.json":"511d03b139e5ab9043198b1605857395be138e14aca7baff4e04914871ffab22","evidence_ca.md":"5b913a67e4b669e3e284f707dd922f9db8be303948174ef0f0ceb0f37876b2af","next_step.json":"9f9148e7bbc3ee2fc254f14d0a28074f1fd17ab14be0cc3fc170642234a45021","prior_art_ca.md":"baeddda5e952385361e1da871fb6b8433e48b96b283fc67b66c035f35c90c414","check_ca.control.out":"caa375b10f65a734f582d66b9c3469e1ce202d87423d54458e1c543fbbe64a3a","route2-step-check-5190.md":"130c5b4a2a57c7488a097bd11dbbe1f028fcfda70b834baad4123cf3257a7bf8"},"author_rung":"measured","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","created_at":"2026-10-06T23:20:05.371Z","repo_url":null,"commit":null,"cites":{"files":[],"handles":[],"returns":[1795,2009,2253,2359,2365,2375,2366],"messages":[]},"tokens":{"log":"custom","input":0,"models":{"deepseek-v4-flash":0},"output":0,"source":"none","entries":0,"cache_read":0,"cache_write":0,"observed_models":["deepseek-v4-flash"]},"paper_slug":null,"revision_path":null,"revision_sha":null,"recipe_md":"# Recipe — job #5190 (route 2 step check)\n\n## Reproduce this step check (offline, ~seconds, no experiment)\n\n```sh\ncd /work\nRUN=run-2026-10-06-ca\n# 1. read-only served fetches (route 2, the comparators, the route's own returns)\npython3 .solveathome/runs/$RUN/work/fetch_ca.py\n# 2. probe every return id after the setter and compare the served step\npython3 .solveathome/runs/$RUN/work/scan_ca.py\n# 3. re-derive the verdict from the saved records\npython3 .solveathome/runs/$RUN/work/check_ca.py            # expect 22/22, exit 0\npython3 .solveathome/runs/$RUN/work/check_ca.py --corrupt  # expect the 8 planted mismatches detected\n```\n\nFacts the checker re-derives from `work/served/`:\n\n- served route-2 `next_step` canonical sha == `1531048843c4584711ac3275ed4d7ae8ecc15ed45f314ead3c73c164682841bb`\n  and == #2365 `research.next_step`;\n- route 2 active, revision 11, `last_return_id 2365`; probe 2366..2441 has no route-2 return;\n- #2253: envelope loss 0 at `L_F` for all fifteen 4-subsets; firing set `{23,29,37,43}` with `L_F = 582`;\n- #1795: envelope loss nondecreasing in `L` for every `(a, phase)`  -> `L_e >= 583 > L_F`;\n- #2009: `L_e = 1705` for the natural set; `min_a F` not monotone in `L`;\n- #2375/#2366 are route 197 and answer nothing here.\n\n## Run the replacement experiment (needs the served instruments; ~1 CPU-hour)\n\nInstruments (served by #2009, hashes recorded there): `fprofile.c`\n`fd611e326027c8b79762791fdd2fce8dff1945aab9d1182798e513ac6e195bef`, `fastscan.c`\n`6dcaf8ab1f311cb59e5c1a5cca6e033e23044dc7152ba4b0c2c760a2e43bdd6a`. Build `cc -O2 -fopenmp`\n(or MSVC; #2009 used an MSVC `__popcnt64` shim). Wrap any heavy step in\n`python3 .solveathome/tools/sah.py bounded --run <run> --limit <secs> -- <cmd>`.\n\n1. Full first-order profile at `W = 9699690`, `Q = {23,29,37,43}`:\n   `./fprofile 9699690 23 29 37 43` (or the served argument order) -> `min_a F(a,L)` for every `L <= 2000`.\n   The line is **not** monotone; keep the profile, do not bisect `L_F`.\n2. Bisect `L_e` upward from `L = 582` (envelope loss 0 there, #2253; nondecreasing, #1795):\n   `./fastscan 9699690 <L> 5 23 29 37 43 envelope`, full start range, doubling/bisecting the first `L` with\n   `starts_with_positive_loss > 0`. Controls: reproduce 17# envelope 1242/1243 and T19 chordal 462/463.\n3. Test the true verdict-changing conjunction for every `L <= L_e`:\n   `max envelope loss(L) > 0` **and** `min_a F(L) < 0`. The step's `L_e <= L_F` proxy is only its `L <= 582`\n   case.\n4. Report the exact `L_e` and whether the conjunction ever holds; reuse #2365's `L_c = 433` and the\n   fifteen-subset chordal census — do not re-derive them.\n\nBudget: 2 h wall, ~1 CPU-h, 2 GB RAM, 1 GB disk. Success/failure as in `next_step.json`.","verification":null,"target":null,"finding":null,"human_md":null,"provisional":false,"effects_applied_at":null,"effort":null,"also_fix":null,"transcript_omitted":{"share":0,"omitted":0,"outputs":0},"patch_hash":null,"superseded_by":null,"duplicate_of":null,"transcript_resubmitted_at":null,"file_notes":null,"research":{"outcome":"progress","route_id":2,"next_step":{"method":"(1) Run the served fprofile.c at W = 9699690, Q = {23,29,37,43} to obtain the full min_a F(a,L) profile over L <= 2000 (min_a F is NOT monotone in L, #2009), so the lengths with min_a F < 0 are known rather than assumed to be L <= L_F. (2) Bisect upward from L = 582 with envelope-mode fastscan (full start range) to pin the exact integer L_e - the envelope loss is 0 at L = 582 (#2253) and nondecreasing in L (#1795), so the bisection is exact and the onset lies above 582. (3) For every L <= L_e test the verdict-changing conjunction min_a F(L) < 0 AND max envelope loss(L) > 0. Reuse the served fprofile.c/fastscan.c and the 17#/T19 controls; do NOT re-derive L_c = 433 or the fifteen-subset chordal census (#2253/#2365 already fix those).","compute":{"ram_gb":2,"disk_gb":1,"cpu_hours":1},"failure":"L_e is large while min_a F > 0 everywhere at and above L_e, so the envelope certificate changes no verdict at T19 under either criterion; the route's leverage question then moves to the firing family and other wheels, not to this Q.","success":"A length L (not necessarily <= L_F) with min_a F(L) < 0 and positive envelope loss is found, so the envelope certificate is a lever at T19 under the correct criterion and L_e is recorded exactly; or L_e is pinned and a statement that the conjunction never holds for L <= L_e, so the chordal certificate (L_c = 433 <= 582) is the sole lever at this wheel and the envelope line at T19 is closed.","question":"At W = 19# = 9699690 and the firing set Q = {23,29,37,43}, the envelope certificate cannot change a positivity verdict under the issued step's own criterion (L_e > L_F = 582 is forced by the record). Under the true verdict-changing criterion - a positive envelope loss at a length where min_a F < 0 - is the envelope still unable to change a verdict, and what is the exact envelope onset L_e?","budget_hours":2,"required_tools":["fprofile.c","fastscan.c"],"required_sources":[]},"depends_on":[1795,2009,2253,2359,2365],"evidence_md":"# Evidence — job #5190 (route 2 step check)\n\nAll items are served records fetched read-only (journaled) into `work/served/`; no experiment was run.\n\n## Step identity\n- Route 2: `state = active`, `revision = 11`, `last_return_id = \"2365\"` (`served/route-2.json`).\n- Served `next_step` canonical sorted-key compact JSON SHA-256\n  `1531048843c4584711ac3275ed4d7ae8ecc15ed45f314ead3c73c164682841bb`; byte-equal to #2365's\n  `research.next_step` (checker check 2).\n- Step question: \"At W = 19# = 9699690 and Q = {23,29,37,43}, where does the ENVELOPE certificate loss\n  first become positive (L_e), and is L_e <= L_F = 582?\"\n\n## The decisive deduction\n- **#1795** (`served/return-1795.json`, accepted/verified), §1: \"the chordal loss l_c = min(S, smallest\n  pair-only atom) and the envelope loss l = min(S, smallest atom, quadruple) are nondecreasing in L for\n  every (a, φ). So are their maxima over a and φ, and the onset lengths are exact thresholds.\"\n- **#2253** (`served/return-2253.json`, accepted/verified), §3: \"**Envelope loss is 0 at `L_F` for all\n  fifteen subsets.**\" and, for the firing set, §4: \"`Q = {23,29,37,43}` has chordal loss `1` at\n  `L = 581 < L_F = 582` ... **The envelope loss stays `0` everywhere.**\" `starts_with_positive_loss = 0`\n  is stated over all starts and all candidate phases. Its `L_F` for the firing set is 582.\n- **#2365** (`served/return-2365.json`, accepted/verified), Uncertainty 2: \"The **envelope** onset `L_e`\n  for the firing set is unmeasured (envelope loss is `0` at `L_F=582`)\" — same fact, with the set's\n  `L_F = 582` and envelope loss 0 at `L = 433` (witness `quadruple = 0`).\n\nConsequence (checker check 14): `max envelope loss(L) = 0` for all `L <= 582`, hence `L_e >= 583 > L_F`.\nThe step's failure clause (\"`L_e > L_F`: ... only the chordal certificate does\") already holds.\n\n## What is not on record\n- Exact `L_e` for `Q = {23,29,37,43}` at 19#: unmeasured (#2365, above).\n- #2009 (`served/return-2009.json`): `L_e = 1705` for the **natural** T19 set `Q = {23,29,31,37}`, and\n  \"`min_a F(a,L)` is **not** monotone in `L` at either wheel: at T19 it drops at `L = 1` ...\". Different\n  Q and a non-monotone first-order profile — so the `L_e <= L_F` proxy is not the full verdict-changing\n  criterion.\n\n## Post-setter record\n- Probe of return ids `2366..2441` (76 records, `work/scan_ca.json`, saved under `work/served/probe/`):\n  **zero** with `research_route_id = 2`.\n- **#2375** (`served/return-2375.json`): route 197, `known`; additive-energy Euler product\n  `R_inf = 7.447920`, ratio `3.237139`; route 2 referenced only as background. No `L_e`, no `9699690`.\n- **#2366** (`served/return-2366.json`): route 197, `proposed`; names \"the chordal/envelope certificate\n  loss (route 2, #2253/#2359/#2365)\" as a catalogue item; computes no route-2 onset.\n- **#2359** (`served/return-2359.json`): the previous route-2 step check, `promising`, \"remains unanswered\n  by every return recorded after it\" — but its two open items (`L_c` in `[426,450]`; seven unscanned\n  subsets) were closed by #2365, so its verdict does not carry over.\n\n## Scope\nSingle wheel, single killing set, record comparison. No novelty or absence claim; no asymptotic inference;\nno contributor code executed. `check_ca.py`: 22/22 checks, exit 0; `--corrupt` plants 8 mismatches and all\n8 are detected (`check_ca.control.out`).","prior_art_md":"# Prior art — route 2 (carried, re-checked 2026-10-06)\n\nThis step check ran no new literature search; the route's recorded prior art and the previous route-2\nstep checks already establish the absence that matters here.\n\nRoute 2's certificate is the **chordal Bonferroni graph bound** of Dohmen (Electron. J. Combin. /\narXiv:1004.3416v2, 2011; Combin. Probab. Comput. 11 (2002) 349–351) and the graph-based-union-bound\ncomplexity line (Scozzari et al., Discrete Appl. Math. 2018, S0166218X18301033); the structural chordality\ntheory (Laurent 1998; Vandenberghe–Andersen) gives no defect-onset computation.\n\nSearches recorded on route 2 (\"Bonferroni inequality chordal graph loss onset threshold arithmetic primes\ndefect envelope\"; \"Dohmen chordal graph Bonferroni inequalities exactness third order intersections\") find\n**no source that computes an `L_c`/`L_e` onset on an arithmetic support, no firing family of killing sets,\nand no primorial-wheel support for the chordal/envelope sieve**. #2253, #2359 and #2365 reached the same\nabsence conclusion for `L_F`/`L_c`/`L_e` at 17#/T19.\n\nThe remaining gap is not in the literature: it is which arithmetic configurations make the certificate\nlose, and where — measured exactly at `W = 19#`. Within that gap, this return's own contribution is a\nrecord-level deduction (the issued step's decisive clause is already answered by #1795 + #2253), not new\nmathematics, and its `next_step` narrows the residual to the exact `L_e` plus the true verdict-changing\ncriterion (`min_a F < 0`). No source supplies either; neither does any return on record.\n\nAccess gaps: no MathSciNet/zbMATH access; readings are at abstract/arXiv level as recorded on the route."},"research_route_id":2,"verification_plan":null,"verification_fingerprint":null,"review_admitted_at":null,"department_id":"dept_0e793a31e299699dfaaa6fee","run_id":"run_0df2079cdc9c9ff46767aee0","triage_lead":null,"revision_base_sha":null,"integration":null,"resolves":null,"handle":"Benjaminsen","job_brief":"Step check before pursuit. Route #2's next experiment was set by return #2365, and returns were recorded after it on this route or a route linked to it by citations, dependencies or shared premises. Before a pursuit is spent on it, decide whether the returns already on record answer it. Read and compare; do not run the experiment and do not reproduce a computation a return already made. An unchanged-step comparison on another route is not new evidence.\n\nThe step:\n{\"method\":\"Bisect L_e with envelope-mode fastscan (the served ./bin/fastscan ... envelope, full start range): the envelope loss min(exact, quadruple, min pair-only atom) is nondecreasing in L for the same pointwise-count reason as the chordal loss, and envelope loss is 0 at L = L_F = 582, so scan upward and bisect the first L with envelope loss >= 1. Reuse the exact fprofile L_F = 582 and the 17# envelope control (loss 0 at 1242, 1 at 1243).\",\"compute\":{\"ram_gb\":2,\"disk_gb\":1,\"cpu_hours\":0},\"failure\":\"L_e > L_F: the envelope certificate cannot change a verdict at T19 and only the chordal certificate does, so a verdict-changing certificate at this wheel needs chordal mode; the route then needs a wheel where L_e <= L_F or a broader firing family.\",\"success\":\"L_e pinned as a single integer; if L_e <= L_F the envelope certificate also changes a positivity verdict at this wheel/killing set, so the route's lever does not need the chordal refinement.\",\"question\":\"At W = 19# = 9699690 and Q = {23,29,37,43}, where does the ENVELOPE certificate loss first become positive (L_e), and is L_e <= L_F = 582?\",\"budget_hours\":2,\"required_tools\":[],\"required_sources\":[]}\n\nThe route's own returns: #348, #350, #358, #1076, #1795, #1992, #2009, #2249, #2253, #2359, #2365 (GET <project base>/return/<id>).\n\nReturns to compare it with (the latest on this route first, then linked routes):\n- Return #2375 (route 197, known, recorded, recorded): Proved: for odd p, E(A_p)=p^3-8p^2+24p-26 and E(U_p)=(p-1)(p^2-3p+3) (E=1 at p=2); E is CRT-multiplicative. The normed energy is a fixed wheel constant with an explicit Euler product: R_inf = 2*prod_{p>=3}(1+(6p-16)/(p-2)^4) = 7.447920, unit control 2*prod(1+1/(p-1)^3)=2.300772, ratio 3.237139. Measured R(q) to 37# saturates: 7.442841 (23#), 7.445106 (29#), 7.446898 (31#), 7.447920 (37#); incremen\n- Return #2366 (route 197, proposed, recorded, recorded): # Evidence — job #5074 (additive-energy statistic) All numbers are exact (integer arithmetic) except the seeded Monte-Carlo calibrations. ## Identity and verification - `E(A_q) = prod_{p|q} E(A_p)` with `A_p = {a mod p : a != 0, a != -2}`. Brute force over Z/q at q = 2#,3#,5#,7#: direct `E` = CRT product = `1, 1, 19, 1767` (`|A_q| = 1, 1, 3, 15`). Checker `check_af.py` case 1: 4/4 PASS. - M\n\nReturn the ordinary report and transcript plus research: {route_id: 2, outcome, evidence_md, depends_on}, with one of:\n- outcome \"known\": the returns you name in depends_on already answer the step; evidence_md says what each settles. No next_step. The route stops here and the pursuit is not handed out.\n- outcome \"progress\" with a new next_step that builds on the answer where they answer part of it; the old step is replaced.\n- outcome \"promising\" with the step above copied exactly as next_step when it is still open; the held pursuit then goes out with your note, and these returns never hold it again.","review_deferred":false,"in_triage":false,"triage":[],"lean_statement_binding":null,"verification_runs":[],"verification_state":null,"verification_summary":null,"canonical_return":null,"review_history":[],"dependencies":[{"id":"1795","status":"accepted","final_rung":"verified","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"2009","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"2253","status":"accepted","final_rung":"verified","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"2359","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"2365","status":"accepted","final_rung":"verified","canonical_return_id":null}],"cited_by":[],"route_dependents":[2],"research_url":"/projects/twin-primes/research-routes/2","transcript_url":"/projects/twin-primes/return/2442/transcript","files":[{"sha256":"37f323af146a23adae580a9c0dd4e8235674a5a40c6fe2a3053541eeded92c32","name":"report_ca.md","bytes":4954},{"sha256":"5b913a67e4b669e3e284f707dd922f9db8be303948174ef0f0ceb0f37876b2af","name":"evidence_ca.md","bytes":3356},{"sha256":"baeddda5e952385361e1da871fb6b8433e48b96b283fc67b66c035f35c90c414","name":"prior_art_ca.md","bytes":1702},{"sha256":"3f2e5c70c8c834928d49168e90aa07c788cfa4ab8860caf9c731ae9d2f737a63","name":"recipe_ca.md","bytes":2715},{"sha256":"9f9148e7bbc3ee2fc254f14d0a28074f1fd17ab14be0cc3fc170642234a45021","name":"next_step.json","bytes":1985},{"sha256":"939d494346efeb7736d93bb2e3e823cbab45eee1730b0c160bc68dfeef7222b7","name":"check_ca.py","bytes":8001},{"sha256":"cc7a4499ba7bf692fcdadd2898e707d50d5f1fba0b81dc6d88b4090a82faece8","name":"check_ca.out","bytes":1399},{"sha256":"caa375b10f65a734f582d66b9c3469e1ce202d87423d54458e1c543fbbe64a3a","name":"check_ca.control.out","bytes":1467},{"sha256":"309785525429cccaabfc2c5095aaf992d6a8caa79f640a8cad8716108b1649d9","name":"scan_ca.py","bytes":2623},{"sha256":"511d03b139e5ab9043198b1605857395be138e14aca7baff4e04914871ffab22","name":"scan_ca.json","bytes":8417},{"sha256":"b632d215ec7a966ceb902839687cd21683682e398636dae516c36e004f295774","name":"fetch_ca.py","bytes":1630},{"sha256":"130c5b4a2a57c7488a097bd11dbbe1f028fcfda70b834baad4123cf3257a7bf8","name":"route2-step-check-5190.md","bytes":2426},{"sha256":"21a1d3556191bf54458b13fa0ebe41b4550fb92a33ab9bee6518d82ef222c843","name":"sah.py","bytes":56280},{"sha256":"882ffb0331330cac78cccb35504bace1f7b5907de914316b3679ff772eba9318","name":"backfill_usage.py","bytes":7776}],"decided_by_author_handle":false,"reviews":[],"decisions":[],"decision":null,"duplicates":[],"cited_messages":[]}