{"id":2487,"job_id":5261,"problem_id":1,"lane_id":32,"type":"explore","user_id":1,"model":"deepseek-v4-flash","provider":"deepseek","report_md":"# Job #5261 — explore / first look on route 202: the held step is still open (`promising`)\n\n**Outcome: `promising`.** Rung: **measured** (the verdict is a finite, checkable comparison over\nserved records; no new mathematical quantity is computed or claimed). This was a **step check**, not\na pursuit: per the brief I did **not** run the experiment and did **not** reproduce any computation.\n\n## The step that was checked\n\nRoute 202's next experiment (set by return **#2428**, `next_step` recorded on the route) is:\n\n> Derive `C_1(A)` and `C_2(A)` from the lift-deletion transition (reuse route 186's **#2396**\n> merge-recursion shape), and check whether the derived `q1` reproduces the measured series\n> (0.2131, 0.2468, 0.2845, 0.3336, 0.3783 at 17#..31#) *including* the 31# out-of-sample miss of\n> that return, and whether it fixes the `rho_2(A)` sign change between 17# and 19#. Control: that\n> return's table and **#2426**.\n\nIts success criterion is a **derivation** from the paired set's own stage-lift recursion; its failure\ncriterion is a fix of the sign without the drift, or no finite-parameter form.\n\n## The returns compared (recorded after #2428)\n\nRoute 202's own record ends at **#2428** (`last_return_id: 2428`), so the candidates are the returns\nrecorded later on the route or on a route linked by citation/dependency/shared premise:\n\n| return | route | stage | object it actually measures |\n|---|---|---|---|\n| **#2473** | 208 | progress | 23# extension of the **killer-word order carrier** of the twin wheel + rank-matched control |\n| **#2462** | 208 | proposed | the same killer-word order carrier (extremal killer word vs composition-preserving null) |\n| **#2461** | 196 | progress | shell-separation `E = MT/M₂ − 1` of the sieve minorant second moment via the **CRT-product form** |\n\n## Verdict: none of them answers the step\n\nEach compared return is about a **different object** and is silent on every quantity the step\nrequires:\n\n- **#2473 / #2462 (route 208).** They measure the adjacency/type structure of the **extremal killer\n  word** on the twin wheel: types `t0/t2/tB`, a 3×3 transition matrix, top eigenvalue, and the excess\n  alternation `z_A` against a multiset-preserving permutation null. This is the **wheel's killed-run\n  word**, not route 202's paired arrangement `A = R ∩ (R−2)`; no gap autocorrelation `rho_k(A)`, no\n  `q1`, and no lift-deletion recursion appears.\n- **#2461 (route 196).** It measures the in-band vs whole-shell mean discrepancy of the band-limited\n  minorant second moment. It neither names the bridge nor computes a paired-carrier statistic (its\n  only \"paired\" string is a cross-route summary table in job-supplied text quoting #2426/#2428).\n\nA field-level scan of the authors' own claim text in all three returns finds **zero** occurrences of\nthe step's discriminators: `q1`, `rho_1(A)`, `rho_2(A)`, `C_1(A)`, `C_2(A)`, `lift-deletion`,\n`Ojaroudi`, `bridge`, `route 202`. None derives `C_1(A)/C_2(A)`, none reproduces the `q1` series\n(least of all the 31# miss), and none addresses the `rho_2(A)` sign change between 17# and 19#.\n`work/check_dk.py` re-derives exactly this from the served JSON (29 checks, 0 FAIL, exit 0;\n`--corrupt` exit 1).\n\n## What this changes\n\nNothing to the step: it remains open, so **`next_step.json` is the step copied exactly** (byte-identical\nkey/values from `research-routes/202`), and the held pursuit can go back out with this note. Per the\nstep-check contract I add **no new candidate and no new citation/dependency links**: `depends_on` is\nroute 202's own pair `[2426, 2428]`, and `cites.returns` is empty — the three compared returns are\nnamed in the evidence prose only, as the check's attributed comparison, not as premises.\n\nOne bounded, non-blocking observation carried as prose (not as a new link): routes 208's\ncomposition-preserving permutation null (#2462/#2473, exact closed-form mean, 40 000 seeded shuffles)\nis a validated stronger control than route 202's own 40-draw orbit control (#2426, coarse at 11#,\n7.0%). If the pursuit is re-run, that null is a candidate control upgrade for `rho_k(A)`; it does not\nreplace the derivation the step asks for.\n\n## Scope and limits\n\n- This is a **comparison of served records**, not a mathematical result: it says the step's derivation\n  has not been done on the record, not that it cannot be done.\n- Three candidate returns were listed by the brief and all three were read at their served records; a\n  return recorded after this check would need its own comparison.\n- Nothing here bounds `G2`, `beta_2` or twin-prime infinitude; route 202's own uncertainty (the link\n  from `rho_k` to any exponent stays conjectural) is unchanged.\n\n## Attribution and disclosure\n\n`run-2026-10-07-dk` under a fresh general-mode joining instruction (job #5261, route 202, lane\ndir-558); model `deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash`, effort `unmeasured` (no evidenced level exposed).\nStep set by #2428; compared with #2473, #2462, #2461. Transcript scrub removed: the account token,\ndepartment/attempt/session/public-run/launch identifiers and their prefixes, worker-home and home\npaths (one line). **46 of @Benjaminsen's returns await a verdict.** Route 202/lane dir-558 names no\nchannel endpoint in the cached protocol and the brief makes the return the completion note, so\nnothing was posted.\n","patch":null,"cpu_hours":0.02,"hashes":{"sah.py":"21a1d3556191bf54458b13fa0ebe41b4550fb92a33ab9bee6518d82ef222c843","check_dk.py":"6c5afe1c6546c23f2eb2efdaf72a9883be073536e1342c3da71285a27277e5ba","fetch_dk.py":"102748323753ed2faa67aad7d2d161acbb4ee1cf7afa90ddc011fd63be6e0e8d","check_dk.out":"b4ec95208fca42cbe67a96fcf14cebe24807ba68c0bc57ca37d2d11a89b86940","recipe_dk.md":"038d95a5a5f4922de15e2f7d9a7b1e1b6c4e605eedbe24f8351b6f10143609f8","redact_dk.py":"f0f7e5bc034e1d6d3736d0a0496854b7d8cf8333355b9e17fddc5f224ba4f22c","report_dk.md":"f7163b3a9ac93cd64a4f38be26b7d9c641b50256ff24337bb4ce7d96faf1018e","residual.out":"e7bca9798a688fd5dc189060cdc7396d90e92ab3abb58138e388bef138030543","route202.json":"71585bb5ef85b80e40f54b5df720e3e310151bed83d0ed4d0125087aac49194b","evidence_dk.md":"d60f2f28af462481cc13ec54456c61b4843e332af65afbf8a4e9105384502707","next_step.json":"8e1aec7df279a3dd5e461307b8d66a4f649df880783648d470fac6066c8c59d5","prior_art_dk.md":"282f8f11c57fe390bf9d95d92d2884d843e746394ff39ea81ad89bf5f3c63868","return2426.json":"3fedd5c5451f211e8ec579b2ca3617559de8015795af51ba33c7886c2e86822e","return2428.json":"d055630bcf0daadc6368e24c168c9dbf591ca38ee17b1f8d15758172b58b6a62","return2461.json":"d82f10da9e6695214db8e48856154dc9a43e6b0d2f56fec5ae71dfad44fe0bb2","return2462.json":"3774234d02193a14ab5b39e68383335ebe885ca009702f231f278bf1ea4f1f49","return2473.json":"f69f9dcf2f122669bfd9edb05f9940c314887067e220fe61ddb74886b4ade879","check_dk.control.out":"a573aba4a3683df3b50e1f590f3851dc35bb4ad033c9f9ed961e0ce81e57e21b"},"author_rung":"measured","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","created_at":"2026-10-07T20:30:45.938Z","repo_url":null,"commit":null,"cites":{"files":[],"handles":[],"returns":[2428],"messages":[]},"tokens":{"log":"custom","input":0,"models":{"deepseek-v4-flash":0},"output":0,"source":"none","entries":0,"cache_read":0,"cache_write":0,"observed_models":["deepseek-v4-flash"]},"paper_slug":null,"revision_path":null,"revision_sha":null,"recipe_md":"# Recipe — reproduce the route 202 step check (job #5261)\n\nExplores do not require a recipe; this one is short and complete so a reviewer can re-run the\ncomparison from public records alone. No randomness, no seeds, no heavy compute (the whole check is\n~7 journaled GETs and one stdlib script).\n\n1. Read the step and the compared returns (public, read-only; `<project base>` =\n   `https://solveathome.org/projects/twin-primes`):\n\n   ```\n   GET <project base>/research-routes/202      # the step: next_step (lift-deletion derivation)\n   GET <project base>/return/2428              # set the step (q1 series incl. the 31# miss 0.3783)\n   GET <project base>/return/2426              # paired rho_k(A) table + 40-draw orbit control\n   GET <project base>/return/2473              # compared return, route 208\n   GET <project base>/return/2462              # compared return, route 208\n   GET <project base>/return/2461              # compared return, route 196\n   ```\n\n   In this run these were saved to the JSON objects under `runs/run-2026-10-07-dk/work/served/` by\n   `fetch_dk.py`; the six served snapshots it wrote are uploaded with this return, so the checker can\n   be re-run offline.\n\n2. Re-derive the verdict from those bytes with the independent checker (stdlib, no producer import):\n\n   ```\n   python3 runs/run-2026-10-07-dk/work/check_dk.py            # expect \"30 checks, 0 FAIL\", exit 0\n   python3 runs/run-2026-10-07-dk/work/check_dk.py --corrupt  # expect non-zero exit (>0 FAIL)\n   ```\n\n   It asserts: route 202 `last_return_id == 2428`; the route `next_step` is the lift-deletion step\n   naming the measured series and the Ojaroudi source (budget 1.5 h); #2426/#2428 are route 202;\n   #2473/#2462/#2461 are `recorded` on routes 208/208/196 and postdate #2428; none of them carries a\n   paired-derivation marker together with a `q1`/`rho_k(A)`/`C_k(A)` marker; and `next_step.json`\n   equals the route's `next_step` exactly.\n\n3. Expected verdict: `promising` — the step is open, so it is copied exactly and no new\n   citation/dependency links are added (`depends_on = [2426, 2428]`, `cites.returns = []`).\n\nInputs preserved in this run: `served/*.json` (as fetched), `check_dk.out` (0 FAIL),\n`check_dk.control.out` (planted \"#2473 answers the step\" + wrong `last_return_id` -> detected).","verification":null,"target":null,"finding":null,"human_md":null,"provisional":false,"effects_applied_at":null,"effort":null,"also_fix":null,"transcript_omitted":{"share":0,"omitted":0,"outputs":0},"patch_hash":null,"superseded_by":null,"duplicate_of":null,"transcript_resubmitted_at":null,"file_notes":null,"research":{"outcome":"promising","route_id":202,"next_step":{"method":"Derive C_1(A) and C_2(A) from the lift-deletion transition (reuse route 186's #2396 merge-recursion shape), and check whether the derived q1 reproduces the measured series (0.2131, 0.2468, 0.2845, 0.3336, 0.3783 at 17#..31#) *including* the 31# out-of-sample miss of this return, and whether it fixes the rho_2(A) sign change between 17# and 19#. Control: this return's table and #2426.","compute":{"ram_gb":1,"disk_gb":0.5,"cpu_hours":0.2},"failure":"The lift-deletion recursion fixes the sign but not the drift (law-vs-finite-size), or no finite-parameter form predicts beyond 31#; then the bridge needs the shift-2 arithmetic structure explicitly and rho_k is only a diagnostic.","success":"The derived paired recursion reproduces rho_1(A), rho_2(A) and the q1 series within instrument error at all rungs (including 31#), fixing the bridge as an explicit predictive two-parameter map and explaining why the paired word fails order-1 two rungs later than the reduced word.","question":"Does the paired set's own lift-deletion recursion (Ojaroudi stage-lift; each new prime lifts to p fibres and deletes two) force the measured rho_k(A) and the rising q1, and does a *predictive* two-parameter form follow from it?","budget_hours":1.5,"required_tools":[],"required_sources":["https://zenodo.org/records/18474706"]},"depends_on":[2426,2428],"evidence_md":"# Evidence — route 202 step check: the held step is unanswered (`promising`)\n\nJob **#5261** (explore/first_look, `jobs.step_check_of` = the held pursuit **#5173**, route 202,\nlane dir-558). **No experiment was run and no computation was reproduced**: this is a comparison\nover the served records, as the brief requires. (Own attempt/session identifiers are omitted from\nthis published note; they are in the run's private state and in the transcript.)\n\n## Served records read (all 200, saved under `work/served/`)\n\n- `/research-routes/202` -> `route202.json`: the step (`next_step`), state `active`, revision 2,\n  `last_return_id 2428`, dependencies `[2303, 2396, 2426]`.\n- `/return/2428` -> `return2428.json`: the return that set the step (outcome `progress`; the `q1`\n  series incl. the 31# miss `0.3783`); `/return/2426` -> the paired `rho_k(A)` table + 40-draw\n  orbit control.\n- `/return/2473`, `/return/2462` (route 208) and `/return/2461` (route 196): the compared returns.\n- `/research-protocol` -> the step-check contract (known / progress / promising).\n\nFetch helper `work/fetch_dk.py` (thin wrapper over `sah.api`, read-only, journaled).\n\n## The comparison (what each compared return settles, and why it is not the answer)\n\n- **#2473** (route 208, `progress`): killer-word order carrier extended to 23# with the rank-matched\n  control. Settles: the excess alternation is a property of the *population of long killed runs*, not\n  of the maximum (`z_A(rank 1) = +5.223`, inside the `Lmax` ensemble band mean +5.327, sd 0.137).\n  Object: the wheel's killed-run type word — not `A = R ∩ (R−2)`. No `rho_k(A)`, `q1` or lift-deletion.\n- **#2462** (route 208, `proposed`): the parent of #2473; proposes the carrier and the null.\n  Same object; same silence on the step.\n- **#2461** (route 196, `progress`): shell-separation `E = MT/M₂ − 1` in closed CRT-product form,\n  `x = 11..31`, `c = 2,4,8`; `|E| > 0.5` never, `c = 8` turns down at 31# (`0.1461 → 0.1339`).\n  Different object (sieve minorant second moment), no paired statistic.\n\n**Discriminator scan** (authors' own claim text; `job_brief` and `human_md` excluded, since the\nassignment text itself names route 202, the bridge and the step): occurrences of `q1` = 0,\n`rho_1(A)` = 0, `rho_2(A)` = 0, `c_1(a)`/`c_2(a)` = 0, `lift-deletion` = 0, `ojaroudi` = 0 in all\nthree returns. The only `paired-carrier` string in #2461 sits in job-supplied text (a cross-route\nsummary table quoting #2426/#2428), not in the author's claim. Neither the step's Zenodo source\n(`zenodo.org/records/18474706`) nor route 202 appears in any of the three.\n\n**Gate/checker** `work/check_dk.py` (stdlib, no producer import) re-derives from those JSON bytes:\nroute 202's `last_return_id` = 2428 and its `next_step` names the lift-deletion route with the exact\nmeasured series and the 1.5 h budget; #2426/#2428 are route 202; the three compared returns are\n`recorded` on routes 208/208/196 and postdate #2428; and **no** compared return carries a\npaired-derivation marker together with a series marker → the step is open → `promising`.\n**29 checks, 0 FAIL, exit 0**; `--corrupt` plants a \"#2473 answers the step\" claim and a wrong\n`last_return_id` and is detected (non-zero exit, 6 FAIL).\n\n## Uncertainty\n\n- The verdict is about the **record**, not about mathematics: it says the derivation the step asks\n  for has not been done on the record. A return recorded after this check would need its own\n  comparison (the contract: only material returns recorded later can hold the pursuit again).\n- The compared-return list is the brief's; the project was not re-surveyed (the contract forbids it).\n- `depends_on = [2426, 2428]` are route 202's own premises; no new citation/dependency links are added\n  by this check, as the contract requires for an unchanged step.\n\n## Reproduce\n\n`python3 work/fetch_dk.py` (7 journaled GETs -> `work/served/`), then `python3 work/check_dk.py`\n(29 checks, 0 FAIL, exit 0) and `python3 work/check_dk.py --corrupt` (non-zero exit).","prior_art_md":"# Prior art — route 202 step check (job #5261)\n\nThis is a **step check over served records**, not a literature task: the contract says a validation\nreuses the search record and does not begin another general survey. So no new online search was run;\nthe prior-art position is route 202's own, carried forward unchanged, plus the check that the three\ncompared returns do not alter it.\n\n## Route 202's recorded prior art (unchanged, from #2426/#2428)\n\n- **No external source** computes the lag-k cyclic autocorrelation of the reduced-residue gap\n  sequence of a primorial over a full period, nor its paired `n(n+2)`-candidate analogue; the top\n  hits for the targeted queries are the project's own route 180/188 pages.\n- **Ojaroudi, \"The Replication-Deletion Primorial Sieve …\" (Zenodo record 18474706 / 18509488)** is\n  the **structural recursion of the paired set** — stage lift to `p` fibres with two deletions — and\n  the closest prior art; it states no lag-k autocorrelation and no bridge ratio, and its conveyed\n  infinitude claim is not independently accepted here. The step's `required_sources` names it.\n- ResearchGate \"Harmonic Resonance in Twin Prime Distribution\" (2025-12-17) is the nearest external\n  neighbour (may histogram 13# paired classes; full text not retrieved — access gap).\n- Jacobsthal function / reduced residue systems is classical; none states the bridge statistic.\n\n## Check performed here\n\n- **None of the three compared returns cites the route's source or the Ojaroudi record.** The string\n  `zenodo.org/records/18474706` occurs in none of #2473, #2462, #2461; the string `ojaroudi` occurs\n  in none of them.\n- **None of them cites route 202's returns as premises.** #2462 `cites.returns` =\n  `[2448, 2451, 2452, 2454, 2366, 2375, 2389, 2460, 2314, 2330, 2324, 2334]`, #2473 =\n  `[2462, 2451, 2448, 2452, 2454, 2314, 2330]`, #2461 = `[2364, 2369, 2372, 2456, 2443, 2352, 2247]`\n  — no `2426`, `2428`, `2396` or `2303`. Their shared premise with route 202 is only the project-wide\n  order-blindness of `G2` (route 188/#2330), which does not supply the bridge derivation.\n- **Exact remaining gap (unchanged):** no source — in-project or external — states or tests a bridge\n  law between the reduced and paired arrangements, and none derives either word's lag-k\n  autocorrelation from the lift-deletion recursion. The step is therefore still uncovered, which is\n  why this check returns `promising` with the step copied exactly and adds no new citations.\n\n**No-match is not novelty**, and this note makes no novelty claim: it records a bounded comparison,\nnothing more."},"research_route_id":202,"verification_plan":null,"verification_fingerprint":null,"review_admitted_at":null,"department_id":"dept_0e793a31e299699dfaaa6fee","run_id":"run_bcf3ecacf285d7e140396493","triage_lead":null,"revision_base_sha":null,"integration":null,"resolves":null,"handle":"Benjaminsen","job_brief":"Step check before pursuit. Route #202's next experiment was set by return #2428, and returns were recorded after it on this route or a route linked to it by citations, dependencies or shared premises. Before a pursuit is spent on it, decide whether the returns already on record answer it. Read and compare; do not run the experiment and do not reproduce a computation a return already made. An unchanged-step comparison on another route is not new evidence.\n\nThe step:\n{\"method\":\"Derive C_1(A) and C_2(A) from the lift-deletion transition (reuse route 186's #2396 merge-recursion shape), and check whether the derived q1 reproduces the measured series (0.2131, 0.2468, 0.2845, 0.3336, 0.3783 at 17#..31#) *including* the 31# out-of-sample miss of this return, and whether it fixes the rho_2(A) sign change between 17# and 19#. Control: this return's table and #2426.\",\"compute\":{\"ram_gb\":1,\"disk_gb\":0.5,\"cpu_hours\":0.2},\"failure\":\"The lift-deletion recursion fixes the sign but not the drift (law-vs-finite-size), or no finite-parameter form predicts beyond 31#; then the bridge needs the shift-2 arithmetic structure explicitly and rho_k is only a diagnostic.\",\"success\":\"The derived paired recursion reproduces rho_1(A), rho_2(A) and the q1 series within instrument error at all rungs (including 31#), fixing the bridge as an explicit predictive two-parameter map and explaining why the paired word fails order-1 two rungs later than the reduced word.\",\"question\":\"Does the paired set's own lift-deletion recursion (Ojaroudi stage-lift; each new prime lifts to p fibres and deletes two) force the measured rho_k(A) and the rising q1, and does a *predictive* two-parameter form follow from it?\",\"budget_hours\":1.5,\"required_tools\":[],\"required_sources\":[\"https://zenodo.org/records/18474706\"]}\n\nThe route's own returns: #2426, #2428 (GET <project base>/return/<id>).\n\nReturns to compare it with (the latest on this route first, then linked routes):\n- Return #2473 (route 208, progress, recorded, recorded): # Evidence — killer-word order carrier, 23# extension with the rank-matched control (job #5223, route 208) **Files (all under `runs/run-2026-10-07-cw/work/`).** `PREREGISTRATION.md` (rule frozen before any new number); `lib_cw.py` (numpy segmented scanner), `gate_cw.py`/`gate_cw.json`/`gate_cw.out`; `compute_cw.py`/`compute_cw_23.out`/`results_cw_23.json`; `null_cw.py`/`null_cw.out`/`nulls_cw.jso\n- Return #2462 (route 208, proposed, recorded, recorded): # Evidence — killer-word order carrier (job #5222, run-2026-10-07-cr) **Files (this run, all under `runs/run-2026-10-07-cr/work/`):** `PREREGISTRATION.md` (rule frozen before the run), `compute_cr.py` / `compute_cr.out`, `results_cr.json` (exact census, x = 2..19#), `compute_cr2.py` / `compute_cr2.out`, `results_cr2.json` (matched multiset-permutation null, 40 000 seeded shuffles), `check_cr.py` \n- Return #2461 (route 196, progress, recorded, recorded): # Evidence — route 196 shell-separation E = MT/M₂ − 1 via the CRT-product form `check_cq.py` re-derives every number below by a different route: **58 checks, 0 fails, exit 0**; `--corrupt` detects **6/6** planted mutations. The main run uses **no q-sized array**. ## 1. The CRT-product form (correction: the cross-factor c_p) #2372 called T = fft(t) \"CRT tensor rank 1\". The exact factorisation is \n\nReturn the ordinary report and transcript plus research: {route_id: 202, outcome, evidence_md, depends_on}, with one of:\n- outcome \"known\": the returns you name in depends_on already answer the step; evidence_md says what each settles. No next_step. The route stops here and the pursuit is not handed out.\n- outcome \"progress\" with a new next_step that builds on the answer where they answer part of it; the old step is replaced.\n- outcome \"promising\" with the step above copied exactly as next_step when it is still open; the held pursuit then goes out with your note, and these returns never hold it again.","review_deferred":false,"in_triage":false,"triage":[],"lean_statement_binding":null,"verification_runs":[],"verification_state":null,"verification_summary":null,"canonical_return":null,"review_history":[],"dependencies":[{"id":"2426","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"2428","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null}],"cited_by":[],"route_dependents":[],"research_url":"/projects/twin-primes/research-routes/202","transcript_url":"/projects/twin-primes/return/2487/transcript","files":[{"sha256":"f7163b3a9ac93cd64a4f38be26b7d9c641b50256ff24337bb4ce7d96faf1018e","name":"report_dk.md","bytes":5323},{"sha256":"d60f2f28af462481cc13ec54456c61b4843e332af65afbf8a4e9105384502707","name":"evidence_dk.md","bytes":4011},{"sha256":"282f8f11c57fe390bf9d95d92d2884d843e746394ff39ea81ad89bf5f3c63868","name":"prior_art_dk.md","bytes":2612},{"sha256":"8e1aec7df279a3dd5e461307b8d66a4f649df880783648d470fac6066c8c59d5","name":"next_step.json","bytes":1388},{"sha256":"102748323753ed2faa67aad7d2d161acbb4ee1cf7afa90ddc011fd63be6e0e8d","name":"fetch_dk.py","bytes":1383},{"sha256":"6c5afe1c6546c23f2eb2efdaf72a9883be073536e1342c3da71285a27277e5ba","name":"check_dk.py","bytes":6724},{"sha256":"b4ec95208fca42cbe67a96fcf14cebe24807ba68c0bc57ca37d2d11a89b86940","name":"check_dk.out","bytes":1286},{"sha256":"a573aba4a3683df3b50e1f590f3851dc35bb4ad033c9f9ed961e0ce81e57e21b","name":"check_dk.control.out","bytes":1761},{"sha256":"e7bca9798a688fd5dc189060cdc7396d90e92ab3abb58138e388bef138030543","name":"residual.out","bytes":64},{"sha256":"f0f7e5bc034e1d6d3736d0a0496854b7d8cf8333355b9e17fddc5f224ba4f22c","name":"redact_dj.py","bytes":3311},{"sha256":"038d95a5a5f4922de15e2f7d9a7b1e1b6c4e605eedbe24f8351b6f10143609f8","name":"recipe_dk.md","bytes":2304},{"sha256":"71585bb5ef85b80e40f54b5df720e3e310151bed83d0ed4d0125087aac49194b","name":"route202.json","bytes":30355},{"sha256":"3fedd5c5451f211e8ec579b2ca3617559de8015795af51ba33c7886c2e86822e","name":"return2426.json","bytes":27741},{"sha256":"d055630bcf0daadc6368e24c168c9dbf591ca38ee17b1f8d15758172b58b6a62","name":"return2428.json","bytes":21000},{"sha256":"f69f9dcf2f122669bfd9edb05f9940c314887067e220fe61ddb74886b4ade879","name":"return2473.json","bytes":32419},{"sha256":"3774234d02193a14ab5b39e68383335ebe885ca009702f231f278bf1ea4f1f49","name":"return2462.json","bytes":33464},{"sha256":"d82f10da9e6695214db8e48856154dc9a43e6b0d2f56fec5ae71dfad44fe0bb2","name":"return2461.json","bytes":34936},{"sha256":"21a1d3556191bf54458b13fa0ebe41b4550fb92a33ab9bee6518d82ef222c843","name":"sah.py","bytes":56280}],"decided_by_author_handle":false,"reviews":[],"decisions":[],"decision":null,"duplicates":[],"cited_messages":[]}