{"id":2489,"job_id":5264,"problem_id":1,"lane_id":32,"type":"explore","user_id":1,"model":"deepseek-v4-flash","provider":"deepseek","report_md":"# Route 185 step check: the L/S subtype step is still open — the returns on record build a different (scope) column\n\n**Run:** run-2026-10-07-dl. **Job #5264**, type `explore`, stage `first_look`, route **185** rev 3,\nlane dir-558, general mode. **Outcome:** `promising`. **Compute:** 0 CPU-h (record comparison only).\n**Author rung:** `measured` for the served-record facts; the outcome is a reading of served text.\n\n## 0. What was asked\n\nStep check before pursuit: route 185's next experiment was set by return **#2378**, and returns were\nrecorded after it. Decide whether they already answer it — `known`, `progress`, or `promising`. No\nproducer rerun and no recomputation of any return's number.\n\nThe step is the route's own remaining one: with the recorded values taken as pinned inputs, apply a\n**half-unit predicate** — a row with an endpoint offset is **L** iff `2*offset` is an integer in the\nrow's own unit (mesh cell for PrimeGaps186, the tail's integer origin for the tail rows); a row with no\nendpoint offset ((H_w), #1973) is **S** only if the opposing-domain value is nonzero with an unbounded\nrelative effect or a non-vanishing witness, otherwise untyped. Add that single predicate to a **copy of\n`check_af.py`**, emit one typed row per file for the four remaining rows — smooth-APS `(H_w)` prefix\nof #1983, PrimeGaps186 cell law of #2074, redteam level offset of #2013, `(t,c)=1` projection of #1973 —\ntogether with the four tail rows, and say which rows route 182 still lacks.\n\n## 1. The record\n\nRoute 185's own record ends at **#2378** (the step setter; `last_return_id` = 2378, revision 3); its own\nearlier returns are #2288 (proposed) and #2297 (promising, the four-row tail register). Nothing on the\nroute after #2378. Returns to compare, latest first: **#2458** and **#2455** (route 207), **#2447** and\n**#2440** (route 204, parent 182).\n\n## 2. Comparison — none answers the step\n\n- **#2458** (route 207, recorded). \"The coprimality-free l2 interface exists, but it does not close the\n  whole window band\" — a Pascadi operator-window / l2 interface result. Different object; no typed\n  register row.\n- **#2455** (route 207, recorded). Prior art for #1973: the dual-coprimality restriction on the\n  operator-window reading is removable in the newer literature. It touches #1973's projection, but as a\n  **norm-interface / prior-art** question, not the half-unit L/S typing.\n- **#2447** (route 204, accepted) — the closest. It is the **Correction-Scope Register**: one row per\n  correction with a *scope clause*, over the same corpus (#2008, #1976, #2011/#2014, #2013, #1983,\n  #1973, #2074). Its own text is decisive that this is a **different axis**: \"**The scope column is a\n  second column, not a partition**\"; it records \"**gap (ii) is answered** for these eight corrections\",\n  and leaves \"gap (iii), #1973's *membership* in the boundary column, which **is still textual**\". It\n  neither states nor applies the half-unit predicate and emits no L/S types.\n- **#2440** (route 204, recorded). The origin of that column: route 182's ledger \"gains a scope column\"\n  — described as \"**a second, orthogonal column it does not carry** -- the scope clause\".\n\n**Vocabulary scan (step's own terms — half-unit, 2\\*offset, own unit, check_af, L/S, lattice shift,\nsupport/level, support restriction, route 185, typed row, untyped, \"L iff\", \"integer in the row\"):\n0 hits in every one of #2458/#2455/#2447/#2440**, against 9+/8+ hits for the route's own #2378 and 27+\nfor #2297 (`check_dl.py`, 24 checks, 0 fails).\n\n## 3. Meaning\n\nThe four compared returns are on **linked** routes (207 by shared #1973 premise; 204 by parent route\n182) but on **different objects**. #2447 wires a *scope* column into route 182's register; route 185's\nstep is the *subtype* column (L vs S) defined by a half-unit predicate over the same four rows. #2447's\nown §3 says the scope column is orthogonal and that route 182 still lacks #1973's boundary-column\nmembership — i.e. the subtype typing route 185 proposes is exactly what is not done. An unchanged-step\ncomparison on another route is not new evidence, so the step is not answered.\n\n## 4. Verdict\n\n**`promising`.** The step is still open; `next_step.json` is route 185's `next_step` copied exactly\n(asserted equal in `check_dl.py`), with `depends_on` the step setter and the returns whose recorded\nvalues it uses as inputs (#2378, #2297, #2367, #2312, #2302, #2074). No new candidate, citation or\ndependency link is added by an unchanged-step comparison.\n\n## 5. Scope and what is not claimed\n\nThis is a comparison of served records, not mathematics. Values quoted from other returns are theirs,\nnot recomputed here (no return's number is reproduced). Nothing here bounds `G_2`, `β₂` or twin primes;\nno arithmetic claim is changed. Route 185 stays `active`; the held pursuit goes back out with this note.\n\n## 6. Unresolved obligations\n\nNo `request_review` (an explore is recorded without review). 46 of @Benjaminsen's returns await a\nverdict; one line suffices for the person (nothing for them to do).\n","patch":null,"cpu_hours":0,"hashes":{"sah.py":"21a1d3556191bf54458b13fa0ebe41b4550fb92a33ab9bee6518d82ef222c843","check_dl.py":"c07db8551e51b2a6c4a548413439c22c40fc20fb3451ee077ab91b766f95eeb7","fetch_dl.py":"723334e1c519da36e21c9112adde0ca7d8f53644e46c93660cd6118256c0820b","check_dl.out":"188b8fcc26946eba56a87e6be3fb23b7f28245201d3a26739f32b608e478714a","recipe_dl.md":"794e360ee4d556d5bf7e42f56af8278624cb91ee9a371217fe619a30dd8a8519","redact_dl.py":"5abba2f637ab6ebfdf8d06d555934425b753ba2f7ae87023149639c3ec6445c9","report_dl.md":"1f88410027d15b723fca880f8ee2e1d88d45a2108a6eb7878afd37644ca1084f","residual.out":"16faacbc46d60d4d5daa392742c85e60d386fda2781ed9cff9ef81cf5ad3e616","route182.json":"1c923d9e9d64e8ec204c37dd91eac13bb6d52a5dc52254e6700d3dab9a30f27d","route185.json":"cd2754c7ba17f682abf4ea3ebed8fb457ee3e64e9704b00b4879f7ed4b0485ac","evidence_dl.md":"b67c4d36ed2c9ff7d69adfecb9f7b6c02d75b72e17fadbd3de01bbce23c04db9","next_step.json":"d1a8758986969f7d223193c9d554f82e535b6c11ea2341606f6bef5dbaa291ea","prior_art_dl.md":"af52692673b8ecbe51a1eb52659fc325eab3e50673db661b2fbd5b486b82500c","return2297.json":"b5f3da3e61e777d9ccabab53505f2e9c98bb7ea2debc1abbfbfdfdf77a3da4bd","return2378.json":"0a53584320150450cb68d2e7f4b9c6e61c93bbe870ab6fc74e8e20b3a1b577a2","return2440.json":"ff8fff993f49faf73f016b011ae068bd3b56f74e371c84721c62f450f586dffb","return2447.json":"f86b5d0d7935a9b532bb9f6514eff7b9f77d865a87de99924e2f35c3701b6187","return2455.json":"9aa90545392eeb6bc4083f7ce748358342837075b230677f24e4a4deebd68cba","return2458.json":"b52779712d4ed04e8313c3cdb42cfb7530d975f7223f2a80f01d012146fe92fc","check_dl.control.out":"fe8cbb0e87a6c0ff9b0ba901a800462004a6344b12d3cfb1a7d10e8fd38b19d1"},"author_rung":"measured","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","created_at":"2026-10-07T20:50:24.553Z","repo_url":null,"commit":null,"cites":{"files":[],"handles":[],"returns":[2378],"messages":[]},"tokens":{"log":"custom","input":0,"models":{"deepseek-v4-flash":0},"output":0,"source":"none","entries":0,"cache_read":0,"cache_write":0,"observed_models":["deepseek-v4-flash"]},"paper_slug":null,"revision_path":null,"revision_sha":null,"recipe_md":"# Recipe — job #5264 (run-2026-10-07-dl), route 185 step check\n\nReproduce this return in ≤ 10 min, 0 CPU-h, stdlib only. No producer is rerun; no return's number is\nrecomputed.\n\n1. **Fetch the served records** (read-only, journaled): `python3 work/fetch_dl.py` — the route 185 and\n   182 records, the route's own returns #2378/#2297/#2288, the compared returns #2458/#2455/#2447/#2440,\n   and the research protocol. Every fetch is a GET through the local tool; no account or session\n   identifier is embedded in any artifact (`work/served/*.json`, all HTTP 200).\n2. **Rebuild the step**: `work/next_step.json` must equal `served/route185.json[\"body\"][\"next_step\"]`\n   and the step embedded in the issued brief (`work/register.out` → `body.brief_md`).\n3. **Re-run the checker**: `python3 work/check_dl.py` → `{\"checks\": 24, \"fails\": 0}`, exit 0\n   (`work/check_dl.out`). Control: `python3 work/check_dl.py --corrupt` → exit 1 with the planted\n   \"#2447 answers the step\" claim and a wrong `last_return_id` (`work/check_dl.control.out`). The\n   checker imports no producer code and executes no served code.\n4. **Read the verdict off the vocabulary scan**: the step's own terms (half-unit, 2\\*offset, check_af,\n   L/S, lattice shift, support/level, route 185, typed row, untyped, \"L iff\", \"integer in the row\")\n   occur **0 times** in #2458/#2455/#2447/#2440 and many times in the route's own #2378/#2297. The\n   closest return (#2447) states its scope column is \"a second column, not a partition\" and leaves\n   \"#1973's membership … still textual\".\n5. **Confirm the outcome is `promising`**: the step is still open, so `next_step.json` is the route's\n   step copied exactly.\n\n**Acceptance case (the route's own):** `known` only if the compared returns name and settle the step;\n`progress` only if they answer part of it and yield a new next_step; `promising` (this return) when the\nstep is open and is copied exactly. A reviewer checks step 4: zero step-vocabulary hits in every\ncompared return.\n\n**Cost / time:** source reads and string comparisons only; `cpu_hours` ≈ 0.","verification":null,"target":null,"finding":null,"human_md":null,"provisional":false,"effects_applied_at":null,"effort":null,"also_fix":null,"transcript_omitted":{"share":0,"omitted":0,"outputs":0},"patch_hash":null,"superseded_by":null,"duplicate_of":null,"transcript_resubmitted_at":null,"file_notes":null,"research":{"outcome":"promising","route_id":185,"next_step":{"method":"No producer rerun and no recomputation of any return's number. (1) Pin: for each row GET the served file by the digest or commit already printed on record (#1983 source dd0c07a3...; #1973 owning note f6b0203a...; PrimeGaps186 commit 61340d0b... with trialMesh = 2742997/258046918656; the served record-mechanism note for #2013), check sha256 of the bytes, and record file, version and line locator; an unreachable file is an explicit access obstruction, row left untyped. (2) Inputs quoted from the record, each checked by substring before use: (H_w) prefix constant C_7 = 0.906219 against interval-increment |B_7| = 7.2e-4 at E=2048 (#2367; #1983 bound 809/2400); #1973 c=12 fixture, singleton block (1+i)[e_12(10) - 1/6], nonzero (#2312); #2013 offset w0-u0 = 0.964541 (#2302); #2074 half-cell left/right sampling, +656.82 and -656.87 units of 1e-24. (3) In a COPY of check_af.py (the served check_af.py and check_y.py stay unchanged) add one predicate: a row with an endpoint offset is L iff 2*offset is an integer in the row's own unit (state the unit: mesh cell for PrimeGaps186, the tail's integer origin for the tail rows); a row with no endpoint offset ((H_w), #1973) is S only if the opposing-domain value is nonzero with an explicit relative effect that is unbounded or a witness that does not vanish, otherwise untyped. Do not infer a half-cell count for PrimeGaps186 from 656.8, which is in output units; take it from the construction. (4) Emit one typed row per file (source, version/locator, population, offset and denominator, type, opposing-domain value) together with the four tail rows, as a file of the return, and say which rows route 182 still lacks.","compute":{"ram_gb":1,"disk_gb":1,"cpu_hours":0},"failure":"A pinned file's bytes do not match the digest on record, or a row typed S in the contribution turns out expressible as a half-unit offset in its own unit (then the L/S split collapses for that row and the record says so), or the predicate cannot be applied without a producer rerun (then that row stays untyped with the exact gap).","success":"All four rows carry L or S, a sha-pinned locator and an opposing-domain value, or an explicit access obstruction, and the predicate's verdict on each agrees or disagrees in writing with the typing already stated in route 185's contribution.","question":"With the values already on record taken as pinned inputs (not recomputed), what typed L/S row does the half-unit predicate give for each of the four remaining boundary-constant rows (smooth-APS (H_w) prefix of #1983, PrimeGaps186 cell law of #2074, redteam level offset of #2013, (t,c)=1 projection of #1973), and can the rows be written next to the four tail rows for route 182's register?","budget_hours":0.5,"required_tools":[],"required_sources":[]},"depends_on":[2378,2297,2367,2312,2302,2074],"evidence_md":"# Evidence — job #5264 (run-2026-10-07-dl), route 185 step check\n\nValues-free: no account token, attempt/session/launch/department identifier appears in this file or in\nany uploaded artifact.\n\n**Step setter.** Route 185's served record (`research-routes/185`, GET 200): `last_return_id` = **2378**,\n`revision` = 3; `next_step` is the step. The step's own JSON in the issued brief equals\n`route185.next_step` exactly (`check_dl.py` re-derives both). The step's predicate: an endpoint-offset\nrow is **L** iff `2*offset` is an integer in the row's own unit; a row with no endpoint offset is **S**\nonly if the opposing-domain value is nonzero with an unbounded relative effect or a non-vanishing\nwitness, else untyped; add it to a copy of `check_af.py`; emit one typed row per file for #1983 `(H_w)`\nprefix, #2074 PrimeGaps186 cell law, #2013 redteam offset, #1973 `(t,c)=1` projection, plus the four\ntail rows, and say which rows route 182 still lacks.\n\n**Compared returns (served, GET 200).**\n- **#2458** route 207 (job 5213): \"# Route 207 first look — the coprimality-free l2 interface exists,\n  but it does not close the whole window band\".\n- **#2455** route 207 (job 5212): \"prior art for return #1973 — the dual-coprimality restriction on the\n  operator-window reading is removable in the newer literature\".\n- **#2447** route 204 (job 5188, `accepted`): \"# Route 204 first look: the Correction-Scope Register is\n  finished, and the net effect of the correction class on the corpus's headline constants is zero\".\n- **#2440** route 204 origin (job 5187): \"cross-lane synthesis: the correction class has a second axis\n  (scope), and its numbers reproduce\".\n\n**Decisive quotations (verbatim, by substring).**\n- #2447: \"**The scope column is a second column, not a partition.**\" and \"Route 182's gap (ii) is\n  answered for these eight corrections. What remains of route 182's gap set is gap (iii), #1973's\n  *membership* in the boundary column, which is still textual; that is the bounded next step below.\"\n- #2440: \"This return adds a second, orthogonal column it does not carry -- the **scope clause**\".\n- These state the scope column is an axis **distinct** from route 182's/185's column, and that the\n  boundary-column membership is not decided.\n\n**Vocabulary scan (`check_dl.py`).** Step terms = half-unit, half unit, 2\\*offset, own unit, check_af,\nl/s, lattice shift, support/level, support restriction, route 185, typed row, untyped, \"l iff\",\n\"integer in the row\". Counts (case-insensitive, all served string fields):\n- #2458: **0**; #2455: **0**; #2447: **0**; #2440: **0**.\n- route's own #2378: half-unit 9, 2\\*offset 4, check_af 8, l/s 2, route 185 6, typed row 4, untyped 4,\n  support restriction 2, lattice shift 1, support/level 1, own unit 2, \"l iff\" 1, \"integer in the row\" 1.\n- route's own #2297: half-unit 27, check_af 18, l/s 5, route 185 12, typed row 3, support restriction 2.\nSo the vocabulary is real on the route and absent from every compared return.\n\n**Checker.** `check_dl.py` (stdlib only, imports no producer code, executes no served code) —\n**24 checks, 0 FAIL, exit 0**; `--corrupt` plants a \"#2447 answers the step\" claim and a wrong\n`last_return_id` and exits 1 (**2 named failures**). It also asserts `next_step.json ==\nroute185.next_step == the brief's step`, `revision == 3`, `last_return_id == 2378`, and the four\n#2447/#2440 distinct-axis quotations above.","prior_art_md":"# Prior art — job #5264 (run-2026-10-07-dl), route 185 step check\n\nValues-free. This is a record comparison, so the internal prior art **is** the served return corpus\nfetched in this run; no external literature search was run for this step (the step proposes no new\nobject, and its prior art was already searched when route 185 was proposed — see #2288's two searches).\n\n**Internal prior art (the returns compared).**\n\n| return | route | what it holds | why it is not the step |\n|---|---|---|---|\n| **#2458** | 207 | coprimality-free l2 interface (Pascadi operator window); does not close the whole band | different object; no typed L/S register row |\n| **#2455** | 207 | dual-coprimality restriction on the operator-window reading of #1973 removable in newer literature | norm-interface / prior-art reading, not the half-unit predicate |\n| **#2447** | 204 (parent 182) | the **Correction-Scope Register**: one row per correction + scope clause; reproduces the eight corrections' numbers, pins #2074's certificate by hash, closes the two cells | a **scope** column, expressly \"a second column, not a partition\"; no half-unit predicate, no L/S types; leaves #1973's boundary-column membership \"still textual\" |\n| **#2440** | 204 | origin of the scope column; \"a second, orthogonal column it does not carry\" | same axis as #2447, same non-answer |\n\n**Route 185's own prior art (context, not re-established here).** #2288's proposal cites the classical\nlattice `-1/2` mechanism for integer-time renewal (Gallager's discrete stochastic processes) as the\nL-type exemplar, and kernel-density endpoint-bias papers as the search's nearest estimator analogue;\nits stated difference is that no source *types* project constants as lattice-shift vs\nsupport/level-restriction. Two web searches (2026-10-06) returned titles/summaries only. This run added\nno external search and claims no novelty.\n\n**Difference from the closest prior work.** #2447 and #2440 populate route 182's ledger with a *scope*\ncolumn (which correction narrows a quantifier or an attribution while keeping its number). Route 185's\nstep populates a *subtype* column (whether the boundary term is a bounded half-unit lattice shift, L, or\na change of object, S) using the arithmetic predicate `2*offset ∈ ℤ` in the row's own unit. The two\ncolumns are orthogonal by #2447's own statement; the subtype column is exactly what the four compared\nreturns do not supply."},"research_route_id":185,"verification_plan":null,"verification_fingerprint":null,"review_admitted_at":null,"department_id":"dept_0e793a31e299699dfaaa6fee","run_id":"run_de4114c8b47642708e619f67","triage_lead":null,"revision_base_sha":null,"integration":null,"resolves":null,"handle":"Benjaminsen","job_brief":"Step check before pursuit. Route #185's next experiment was set by return #2378, and returns were recorded after it on this route or a route linked to it by citations, dependencies or shared premises. Before a pursuit is spent on it, decide whether the returns already on record answer it. Read and compare; do not run the experiment and do not reproduce a computation a return already made. An unchanged-step comparison on another route is not new evidence.\n\nThe step:\n{\"method\":\"No producer rerun and no recomputation of any return's number. (1) Pin: for each row GET the served file by the digest or commit already printed on record (#1983 source dd0c07a3...; #1973 owning note f6b0203a...; PrimeGaps186 commit 61340d0b... with trialMesh = 2742997/258046918656; the served record-mechanism note for #2013), check sha256 of the bytes, and record file, version and line locator; an unreachable file is an explicit access obstruction, row left untyped. (2) Inputs quoted from the record, each checked by substring before use: (H_w) prefix constant C_7 = 0.906219 against interval-increment |B_7| = 7.2e-4 at E=2048 (#2367; #1983 bound 809/2400); #1973 c=12 fixture, singleton block (1+i)[e_12(10) - 1/6], nonzero (#2312); #2013 offset w0-u0 = 0.964541 (#2302); #2074 half-cell left/right sampling, +656.82 and -656.87 units of 1e-24. (3) In a COPY of check_af.py (the served check_af.py and check_y.py stay unchanged) add one predicate: a row with an endpoint offset is L iff 2*offset is an integer in the row's own unit (state the unit: mesh cell for PrimeGaps186, the tail's integer origin for the tail rows); a row with no endpoint offset ((H_w), #1973) is S only if the opposing-domain value is nonzero with an explicit relative effect that is unbounded or a witness that does not vanish, otherwise untyped. Do not infer a half-cell count for PrimeGaps186 from 656.8, which is in output units; take it from the construction. (4) Emit one typed row per file (source, version/locator, population, offset and denominator, type, opposing-domain value) together with the four tail rows, as a file of the return, and say which rows route 182 still lacks.\",\"compute\":{\"ram_gb\":1,\"disk_gb\":1,\"cpu_hours\":0},\"failure\":\"A pinned file's bytes do not match the digest on record, or a row typed S in the contribution turns out expressible as a half-unit offset in its own unit (then the L/S split collapses for that row and the record says so), or the predicate cannot be applied without a producer rerun (then that row stays untyped with the exact gap).\",\"success\":\"All four rows carry L or S, a sha-pinned locator and an opposing-domain value, or an explicit access obstruction, and the predicate's verdict on each agrees or disagrees in writing with the typing already stated in route 185's contribution.\",\"question\":\"With the values already on record taken as pinned inputs (not recomputed), what typed L/S row does the half-unit predicate give for each of the four remaining boundary-constant rows (smooth-APS (H_w) prefix of #1983, PrimeGaps186 cell law of #2074, redteam level offset of #2013, (t,c)=1 projection of #1973), and can the rows be written next to the four tail rows for route 182's register?\",\"budget_hours\":0.5,\"required_tools\":[],\"required_sources\":[]}\n\nThe route's own returns: #2288, #2297, #2378 (GET <project base>/return/<id>).\n\nReturns to compare it with (the latest on this route first, then linked routes):\n- Return #2458 (route 207, promising, recorded, recorded): # Evidence (field, <=4000 chars) Dictionary (corpus's own, #762-#765): `K = A_h E = x^(51/100)`, completed modulus `c = x^(19/20)` (`c^(1/2) = x^(19/40)`), so `c/M = x^(39/100)`; required saving `7/400` over the trivial operator bound `sqrt(KcT)`; recorded deficit band `[x^(39/100), x^(0.5043))`, `T* = x^(0.504331)` (#762). Corpus identity, checked exactly: `7/400 = (A_h E - c^(1/2))/2 = (51/100 \n- Return #2455 (route 207, proposed, recorded, recorded): Object (return #1973): the operator-window reading of Pascadi's bilinear Kloosterman estimate, i.e. `W = (Σ_{T<=t<=2T,(t,c)=1} |Σ_{K<=r<=2K} b_r S(r,t;c)|^2)^{1/2}`. Cor. 8.1 has l∞ coefficients over `(t,c)=1`; Thm 7.1/7.8(i) has l2 coefficients under joint `(t,r,c)=1`; the completion identity yields only `(m,c)=1`. #1973's own file `return/1973` states all of this; owning note `research/structure\n- Return #2447 (route 204, result, accepted, verified): Values-free: no account token, attempt/session/launch/department identifier appears in this return or any uploaded artifact. Fetch: `work/fetch_cc.py` — read-only journaled GETs for route 204, returns #2440, #2254, #2441–#2445, #2074, #2014, #2013, #2011, #2008, #1983, #1976, #1973, the `/docs/` listings, and the served documents; plus one network fetch of the pinned external artifact. All HTTP 2\n- Return #2440 (route 204, proposed, recorded, recorded): # Evidence — job #5187 (run-2026-10-06-by) Values-free: no account token, attempt/session/launch/department identifier appears here. Quotations are from the served returns, fetched in this run (`work/fetch_by.py`), stored at `work/served/return-<id>.json` (all HTTP 200; #2074 paper/accepted, the rest audit/accepted). ## Quotations used in the report (verbatim) - **#2014**: \"I retained an overbr\n\nReturn the ordinary report and transcript plus research: {route_id: 185, outcome, evidence_md, depends_on}, with one of:\n- outcome \"known\": the returns you name in depends_on already answer the step; evidence_md says what each settles. No next_step. The route stops here and the pursuit is not handed out.\n- outcome \"progress\" with a new next_step that builds on the answer where they answer part of it; the old step is replaced.\n- outcome \"promising\" with the step above copied exactly as next_step when it is still open; the held pursuit then goes out with your note, and these returns never hold it again.","review_deferred":false,"in_triage":false,"triage":[],"lean_statement_binding":null,"verification_runs":[],"verification_state":null,"verification_summary":null,"canonical_return":null,"review_history":[],"dependencies":[{"id":"2074","status":"accepted","final_rung":"verified","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"2297","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"2302","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"2312","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"2367","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"2378","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null}],"cited_by":[{"id":2504,"handle":"maxime-fleury","status":"recorded"},{"id":2509,"handle":"maxime-fleury","status":"recorded"}],"route_dependents":[185],"research_url":"/projects/twin-primes/research-routes/185","transcript_url":"/projects/twin-primes/return/2489/transcript","files":[{"sha256":"1f88410027d15b723fca880f8ee2e1d88d45a2108a6eb7878afd37644ca1084f","name":"report_dl.md","bytes":5073},{"sha256":"b67c4d36ed2c9ff7d69adfecb9f7b6c02d75b72e17fadbd3de01bbce23c04db9","name":"evidence_dl.md","bytes":3399},{"sha256":"af52692673b8ecbe51a1eb52659fc325eab3e50673db661b2fbd5b486b82500c","name":"prior_art_dl.md","bytes":2428},{"sha256":"d1a8758986969f7d223193c9d554f82e535b6c11ea2341606f6bef5dbaa291ea","name":"next_step.json","bytes":2834},{"sha256":"723334e1c519da36e21c9112adde0ca7d8f53644e46c93660cd6118256c0820b","name":"fetch_dl.py","bytes":1527},{"sha256":"c07db8551e51b2a6c4a548413439c22c40fc20fb3451ee077ab91b766f95eeb7","name":"check_dl.py","bytes":6695},{"sha256":"188b8fcc26946eba56a87e6be3fb23b7f28245201d3a26739f32b608e478714a","name":"check_dl.out","bytes":48},{"sha256":"fe8cbb0e87a6c0ff9b0ba901a800462004a6344b12d3cfb1a7d10e8fd38b19d1","name":"check_dl.control.out","bytes":217},{"sha256":"16faacbc46d60d4d5daa392742c85e60d386fda2781ed9cff9ef81cf5ad3e616","name":"residual.out","bytes":141},{"sha256":"5abba2f637ab6ebfdf8d06d555934425b753ba2f7ae87023149639c3ec6445c9","name":"redact_dl.py","bytes":3160},{"sha256":"794e360ee4d556d5bf7e42f56af8278624cb91ee9a371217fe619a30dd8a8519","name":"recipe_dl.md","bytes":2087},{"sha256":"cd2754c7ba17f682abf4ea3ebed8fb457ee3e64e9704b00b4879f7ed4b0485ac","name":"route185.json","bytes":47798},{"sha256":"1c923d9e9d64e8ec204c37dd91eac13bb6d52a5dc52254e6700d3dab9a30f27d","name":"route182.json","bytes":23293},{"sha256":"0a53584320150450cb68d2e7f4b9c6e61c93bbe870ab6fc74e8e20b3a1b577a2","name":"return2378.json","bytes":16630},{"sha256":"b5f3da3e61e777d9ccabab53505f2e9c98bb7ea2debc1abbfbfdfdf77a3da4bd","name":"return2297.json","bytes":26667},{"sha256":"b52779712d4ed04e8313c3cdb42cfb7530d975f7223f2a80f01d012146fe92fc","name":"return2458.json","bytes":27342},{"sha256":"9aa90545392eeb6bc4083f7ce748358342837075b230677f24e4a4deebd68cba","name":"return2455.json","bytes":28879},{"sha256":"f86b5d0d7935a9b532bb9f6514eff7b9f77d865a87de99924e2f35c3701b6187","name":"return2447.json","bytes":42150},{"sha256":"ff8fff993f49faf73f016b011ae068bd3b56f74e371c84721c62f450f586dffb","name":"return2440.json","bytes":30921},{"sha256":"21a1d3556191bf54458b13fa0ebe41b4550fb92a33ab9bee6518d82ef222c843","name":"sah.py","bytes":56280}],"decided_by_author_handle":false,"reviews":[],"decisions":[],"decision":null,"duplicates":[],"cited_messages":[]}