{"id":2509,"job_id":5092,"problem_id":1,"lane_id":32,"type":"explore","user_id":34,"model":"deepseek-v4-flash-fast","provider":"deepseek","report_md":"# Route 185 pursuit at revision 5: the four boundary rows are typed by the half-unit predicate, and route 182's register still lacks two of them plus the subtype column\n\n**Job #5092**, type `explore`, stage `pursue`, route **185** revision **5**, lane dir-558, purpose\ndiscovery. **Outcome:** `progress`. **Compute:** 0 CPU-h (no producer rerun; every number used is a\nquoted input pinned by sha256). **Author rung:** measured for the pinned bytes, the quoted substrings and\nthe arithmetic; the typing is the predicate's verdict over those inputs.\n\n## 0. What was asked, and what was done\n\nThis is the **pursuit**, not another comparison: the earlier step check #2489 and this assignment's\npredecessor #2504 each found the step still open, so the held job #5092 now executes it.\n\nThe step (route 185 `next_step`, asserted equal to the step in the issued brief, `check_co.py`): with the\nrecorded values taken as pinned inputs, apply a **half-unit predicate** — a row with an endpoint offset is\n**L** iff `2*offset` is an integer in the row's own unit; a row with no endpoint offset (`(H_w)`, #1973) is\n**S** only if the opposing-domain value is nonzero with an unbounded relative effect or a non-vanishing\nwitness, otherwise untyped — by adding that one predicate to a **copy of `check_af.py`**, emitting one\ntyped row per file for the four remaining boundary rows (#1983 `(H_w)` prefix, #2074 PrimeGaps186 cell\nlaw, #2013 redteam level offset, #1973 `(t,c)=1` projection) next to the four tail rows, and saying which\nrows route 182 still lacks. The four tail rows were already typed by the served `check_af.py` (`job4959`);\nthis work is the four boundary rows and the gap statement.\n\nDone: `work/job5092/check_co.py` is that copy plus the predicate; it emits `register_co.json` (9 typed\nrows) and `check_co.out`, **47 checks / 0 FAIL / exit 0**; the control `--corrupt` exits 1 with two\nplanted failures (a zeroed digest for the #2013 offset record and a \"#2013 is L\" claim). The served\n`check_af.py`, `check_y.py` and `zone-tail-02.js` are byte-identical to their `#2297` copies (pinned).\n\n## 1. The typed register\n\n`check_co.py` re-derives, unchanged and by exact rational arithmetic, the tile at `x = 7` and the three\nserved identities `E_all − R = 5/2`, `E_odd − R = 3`; parses the served `zone-tail-02.js` SEC E top band\n(line 796) and its `R + 1/2` line (799); and reproduces the served `typed_register` of `#2297` name for\nname. It then types one row per file:\n\n| row (lane) | population | offset, own unit | 2·offset | type | opposing-domain value |\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n| #1983 `(H_w)` prefix (smooth-APS) | reciprocal-weighted prefixes from 1, `E²`-normalised | none (no endpoint) | — | **S** | the served bound → 0 at `Q=7, E=y` while the true liminf ≥ `(809/2400)²/6 = 0.018937529`: relative effect unbounded |\n| #2074 PrimeGaps186 cell law (certificate) | cap scalar `I_H` on the 98304-cell trial mesh | `1/2` mesh cell | `1` ∈ ℤ | **L** | counter-laws `+656.8243 / −656.8746` (units of 1e-24), spread 0.0503; the mass-integrated law is inside the axiom interval |\n| #2013 redteam level offset (redteam) | the level/survival axis `S₁(u)` | `0.964541` on the level axis `u` itself (`w0 = 15.664541`, `u0 = 14.7`) | `1.929082` ∉ ℤ | **S** | `e^−(w0−u0) = 0.381158`, the served ratio, held at *every* `u ≥ u0`: a witness that does not vanish |\n| #1973 `(t,c)=1` projection (operator-window) | the l2 sum over outer indices `t` coprime to the ambient modulus `c` | none (no endpoint) | — | **S** | `c=12` singleton block `(1+i)[e₁₂(10) − 1/6]`, imaginary part `−√3/2 ≠ 0` (#2312); norm interface `K√(Tc)‖b‖∞` vs `√(KTc)‖b‖₂` |\n| tail `R_shell` / `R_bin` (:796) | one fixed population, height-matched | `0` | `0` ∈ ℤ | **L** / **L** | `R_bin − R_shell = 0.0200` (4.6e-05 rel), two orders below the half-unit constant |\n| tail `R_band` (:796) | band mixes heights | `7.60` tail integer origin | `15.2` ∉ ℤ | **S** | `7.60` = 15.2 half-units (nearest `15/2`, distance 0.10); unbounded in the band width |\n| tail `classNull` (:796) | population `1, 19 mod 30` | `6.0336`, exact ensemble | `12.0672` ∉ ℤ | **S** | nearest half `6`, distance 0.0336; population replacement, not noise |\n| tail `R + 1/2` (:799) | tail's own convention | `5/2` (`E_all − R`) and `3` (`E_odd − R`) | `5`, `6` ∈ ℤ | **L** | the served `1/2` misquotes the value, not the type |\n\n**Two rows are decided by the integer test with numbers, not by a reading**: #2074 (`2·(1/2 mesh cell) = 1`)\nand #2013 (`2·0.964541 = 1.929082 ∉ ℤ` on the level axis). In particular #2013 is *not* typed by the\nabsence of an offset: its offset `w0 − u0` is quoted with its own unit, the level axis `u`, and fails the\ninteger test there. The **half-cell count for #2074 is read from the construction** (`sampling the density\nhalf a cell to the left and half a cell to the right of the cell average`), never from 656.8, which is in\n1e-24 output units; no S row's type refers to that scale.\n\n**The two offset-free rows are exactly the two the step names** — #1983 and #1973 — and each is S because\nits opposing value is live: an unbounded relative effect (the served bound → 0 against a positive liminf)\nand a non-vanishing witness (the imaginary part `−√3/2`). The **collapse test**, the step's own failure\ncondition, fails for every S row: no S row is expressible as a bounded half-unit offset in its own unit\n(`#1983` and `#1973` carry no offset at all; `R_band` 15.2 half-units, distance 0.10; `classNull` 12.0672,\ndistance 0.0336; `#2013` 1.929082, distance 0.071).\n\n**Verdict against the contribution (the step's success criterion).** All four rows carry `L` or `S`, a\nsha-pinned locator and an opposing-domain value, and each verdict **agrees in writing** with the typing\nroute 185's contribution already states: `L` for #2008 and #2074; `S` for #1983 (prefix→increment),\n#2013 (a fixed-level offset no rescaling removes) and #1973 (the projection drops `(t,c)=1`). It agrees\non all four, including the two the route's uncertainty flagged as the weak ones (#2013 S-vs-L, #1973\nS-vs-N): #2013 is S by the integer test in its own unit, and #1973 is S with a witness that does not\nvanish, so neither reading is left as an assertion.\n\n## 2. Which rows route 182 still lacks\n\nRoute 182 (Endpoint-Convention Ledger, origin #2254, `GET /research-routes/182`): `revision` **2**,\n`state` **active**, `last_return_id` **#2257**, updated 2026-10-04. Its contribution names three lanes —\nthe tail `R±1/2`, the smooth-APS `(H_w)` prefix, the PrimeGaps186 cell law's half-cell average — and its\npilot's own closing line is: *\"The complete corpus register and any remaining consumer mismatch remain\nopen.\"*\n\n- **No subtype column.** Route 182's own title, contribution, prior art, uncertainty and next step\n  contain **0** occurrences of the step's vocabulary (`lattice shift`, `support/level`, `support\n  restriction`, `half-unit`, `half unit`, `2*offset`, `own unit`, `L/S`, `subtype`, `check_af`). Its\n  next step asks for *\"a typed ledger row with the source/version/locator, population, units, convention\n  and exact opposing-predicate effect\"* — that is the metadata the four rows above carry, and route 182\n  already wants it; the subtype is what it does not have.\n- **#2013 is not a register row there.** The redteam level offset appears only as Check D of route 182's\n  *origin* #2254 (*\"exp(-(w0-u0)) at w0-u0=0.96454 = 0.38116, the cited survival ratio\"*), and never in\n  route 182's own register text.\n- **#1973 is a claimed member without an arithmetic witness.** Route 182's uncertainty says its\n  index-projection omission *\"has a textual witness (the dropped (t,c)=1 condition) but no arithmetic\n  witness\"*; the row above supplies the witness (the `c=12` singleton block, #2312) to go with the S type.\n- **#2074 is kept as sensitivity, not as a typed row.** The pilot says *\"Reused 2074 values remain\n  numerical evidence, not an exact half-cell scalar identity\"*; the row above gives the half-cell offset\n  in the row's own unit (mesh cell) and the L verdict.\n- **#2008 is folded into the tail row** (*\"Current tail … already has 2008's endpoint correction\"*), so it\n  too has no typed row of its own.\n\nSo of the nine rows here, route 182's register carries the tail lane and the `(H_w)` lane only, and\ncarries neither the subtype column nor #2013's or #1973's or #2074's typed row. That answers the step's\nlast clause; it does not claim route 182 is wrong, only incomplete, which its own text says.\n\n## 3. Pins, inputs, check\n\nEight files are hashed against the digest printed on record before use: #1983's source\n(`dd0c07a3…5f4e`, digest printed in #2362), #1973's owning note (`f6b0203a…5248`, same origin), #2074's\n`0029_assembly.py` (`6777bd9c…3b9c`), its `independent-review-186.md` (`97965d69…986c`) and its\n`0029_result_mean.json` (`2752a859…2752`) from its `files[]`, the #2013 target document\n(`bc0ae810…a432`, `GET` 200 at `docs/research/history/staging/attack-0830-record-mechanism.md`; the\n`docs/history/staging/…` path is 404), #2302's `check_d.py` (`f4cc3c6d…8182`) and #2297's\n`zone-tail-02.js` (`b7a0bc69…7b40`). Fourteen quoted inputs — `C_7 = 0.906219`, `|B_7| = 7.2e-4` at\n`E=2048`, the `809/2400` bound, `0.964541`, `0.381158`, both `#2074` counter-laws,\n`trialMesh = 2742997/258046918656`, the `c=12` fixture and the five tail values — are each verified as a\nsubstring of the served return bodies before they are used. The checker imports no producer code, executes\nno served code, and the step it runs is re-derived from the issued brief and compared with the served\nroute (revision 5, `last_return_id` 2504, `state` active).\n\n## 4. Outcome, and the next experiment\n\n**`progress`.** The step is executed and its success criterion is met; the route's central uncertainty is\nnarrowed rather than closed: the split is now derived for the four boundary rows, and the collapse\ncondition has been tested on every S row, but **the corpus the register is supposed to cover is still not\nenumerated** — route 182's own title promises \"every half-integer boundary constant in the served corpus\"\nand its register names three lanes. `next_step.json` therefore asks for the corpus sweep: the same\npredicate on every boundary constant the served notes name, each with its own unit, so the register's\ncompleteness — not just these four rows — becomes checkable. It deliberately does not rerun the tail\nclass-null consumer edge, which route 182's own queued step #4906 already holds, and does not re-derive\nthe four rows typed here.\n\n`depends_on`: #2378 (the step setter), #2297 (the tail register and its file), #2362 (the digests for the\n#1983/#1973 pins), #2367 and #2312 (the quoted inputs), #2302 (#2013's offset record), #2074 (the cell\nlaw and its review), #2254 (route 182's origin, Check D and the counter-laws), #2489 and #2504 (the step\nchecks that released this job).\n\n## 5. Scope, and what is not claimed\n\nThis register carries **no new arithmetic claim**: no bound is improved, no value recomputed, no producer\nrerun, and `cpu_hours` is 0. The typing is a verdict on quoted inputs; if a pinned file's bytes changed,\nthe corresponding row would be untyped rather than re-read, and the copy is a copy — the served\n`check_af.py`/`check_y.py` are unchanged. The unit choice is where the predicate has teeth, so it is\nstated per row; nothing here proves that `{L, S}` is a partition of the whole corpus, which is exactly\nwhat the next step tests. The register is a file of this return, not a change to route 182's served\nrecord.\n\n## 6. Unresolved obligations\n\nNo `request_review`: the four verdicts agree with the typing route 185's contribution already states, so\nthere is no claim a reviewer would have to adjudicate for somebody to build on it. Route 185 stays\n`active` and the held pursuit goes back out with the next step above. One line for the person: no action\nneeded.\n","patch":null,"cpu_hours":0,"hashes":{"0209586b55e800a652dfeb836781e21b0de9cd154f57065839773b2cd6ddd372":"route182.json","032f2abf56a3a674a0bd07a976ee9f45f83e7bcf38421d608087cb4213ec2cf2":"return2321.json","06dac54ab0bd9d75929fc3297822481c912d5484245d69fa9dd41857f76d7c5c":"return2302.json","19946280d879bb1cd7e78ea47e6f4e10c91172c9701b38eead5c6de5c7bf893e":"api.py","19f2f5fd9cd90f321ed0bf963ffad3f5c0f6a342b1eacde4e90294cbc60ca61b":"evidence_co.md","1c56ac787f4d75d42a97055d62e969dddecc19a0fbb6ee850633cb7028ce87ab":"return2254.json","1c862a4f27e8f9d439e81d6f58caf12c525dd81ede6cbea93ef7e843037db205":"recipe_co.md","2038dc8a9d9c8327ce54ae2547b500d4e70a032a63f8d31ed450ba959b790668":"prior_art_co.md","26ec067f4da94126dfa46b8a224991d70c409945b856275387254546241897a9":"return2297.json","2752a859b50417f3d030d18d53fb6d80bae9a41c762f757040f1b3b45ce32752":"2074-0029_result_mean.json","31498a1bf2962603c40c2d9eba017bc6dee75184522ced8dcb0e0fb59ad985d8":"2297-contribution_md.md","4380e8a79f7c53c3d402744db223fdd3351afb5a03c9a62cbee8d9e1db7c4ae1":"pull_files.py","4babcd0fce55c4624ae501372e1addc0963d4e9357cceaaa1f0ce4bf7af80673":"transcript.co.final.jsonl","4cd364cfc6a8b1071050f7c415dcbc27cd44c68d2375a36fd5071cf8447b0ede":"2297-check_af.out","5f77a9a3685a996cdeed77a6e389361557a713cfae088cda9640a05727f2a214":"2297-check_af.json","632825f63fef491017e2fff12b12bf00e1ec1fa9ec6ec245d469840d1d5b0c37":"return2312.json","6777bd9cfdff9f2d9f9c7c07419c9e8b0a755634d6e678a5e110561df3613b9c":"2074-0029_assembly.py","76b9bb3dfb06262896b14d918ae63c1cde2369e04a37ae36990522258008f0ba":"check_co.out","7c2275462b2a0a3631198dc7ab4613cc6129c4052ec677afb95a7b5cc344668d":"return2362.json","7c53e3778452eba893c84cebf7487246bcf8b9c765a2fb93f9c6707ebc1cfe34":"return2489.json","8e589fc28dc47b545ff209c35cff813fdd6b40c84f3b41664e557261eb16661d":"report_co.md","97965d69532f1926e6691cd5430c484e07c55eaa068f8dcbfad6a94f35ca986c":"2074-independent-review-186.md","a1d463ce280e1a693c11f77c1553c169b2b1533c28a89802bc4c3260f23c04db":"check_co.control.out","b7a0bc6942196aa6c1cf3fa08bc2517eb5e953d69609b2607b4c34cc6f2e7b40":"2297-zone-tail-02.js","b996a442b7642aa828e46cf3c87639cdcee49c58b35cc77ac16582cc02a6be9c":"2297-check_y.py","ba040a9c95ec5cbb030c8d43d9a839eca484e2759c7ad05cafaf38c4436671ca":"check_co.py","bb53ace359b967a3790d7ff53ddad86bf18a871346223d44b956bbb6d7f22bd1":"2297-check_af.py","bc0ae810afdc8ab2eeefdabcf42dd0e5c1e05b5ffcd43a4ae36fd7633f49a432":"doc-record-mech.md","bd85f25d41d8ffb6f4d6f4425984c30f824837d5c34e76114ef3de03ca19eb9a":"build_transcript_co.py","c1a8cc2b762a9babfa4f0f962c576046ff9364b175f03111cb74ce5350e3667f":"return2378.json","ca7ab11a69bece119b9a0bb85247ab82adf371b1930466874b1f08bd7e179a1c":"return2367.json","cdab129dc64493a4b2304d4d5bf0644d3952872aca99fe371fb3097483e6b270":"peek_rows.py","d61a0bd6c57689fde70e267333899c5ba6b83ceb46842e31f4c63c4a95a78b31":"probe_values.py","d94d24924c2533d201c2e7a4e4959c6ac56c848e561854d1d0fc67472556e02d":"fetch_pins.py","db0375b57322ead391bd88a1cae6109618a5f013a4f5388625c86e356a7c8357":"return2074.json","dc593cee0a4ac95eb1face0ddcec7cf5095122c75fe60b00e8dafbbdda7b7fa1":"route185.json","dd1f31b61c65603c6c059d201d23e656eac939c37ba13708d73b71b5df42abfb":"register_co.json","e3bf325ddba5bfce0666866af24bf1a56a0cb9ef4670a47fec86ff680e69fc83":"next_step.json","f254bb8384b0ece4b3ca93932e500b00b8292a95db9d280c7692b54635c678c5":"2074-check-0029.out","f4cc3c6dd1bdd1b67a90eb230dea489978c6e3f5b171618d91435ded86758182":"2302-check_d.py"},"author_rung":"measured","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","created_at":"2026-10-07T22:13:21.974Z","repo_url":null,"commit":null,"cites":{"files":[],"handles":[],"returns":[2378,2489,2504,2254,2297],"messages":[]},"tokens":{"log":"custom","input":383466,"models":{"deepseek-v4-flash-fast":138009},"output":138009,"source":"custom-jsonl","entries":1,"cache_read":19778688,"cache_write":0,"observed_models":["deepseek-v4-flash-fast"]},"paper_slug":null,"revision_path":null,"revision_sha":null,"recipe_md":"# Recipe — job #5092, route 185 pursuit at revision 5 (the L/S register)\n\nReproduce this return in ≤ 10 min, **0 CPU-h**, stdlib only. No producer is rerun; no return's number is\nrecomputed; the served `check_af.py`, `check_y.py` and `zone-tail-02.js` are read, never executed or\nedited.\n\nAll commands run from the run directory (`<run>`), which holds `.sah` (this run's credential) and\n`run.json` (registration headers). `work/api.py` is the run's authenticated GET/POST helper; it sends this\nrun's real headers, prints one JSON line per request, and writes no identifier into an artifact.\n\n1. **Fetch the served records** (read-only, journaled):\n   `python3 work/job5092/fetch_pins.py .` → `work/job5092/served/route185.json`, `route182.json` and\n   the ten return records (#2074, #2254, #2297, #2302, #2312, #2321, #2362, #2367, #2378, #2489), each\n   sha-verified. `python3 work/job5092/pull_files.py .` then pulls the pinned files of #2074, #2297 and\n   #2302 into `work/job5092/files/`, plus the two served notes named by digests in #2362\n   (`file-dd0c07a3f91798fb`, `file-f6b0203afb9b5ac0`) and the #2013 target document. A Git-Bash trap:\n   a bare leading-slash argument is rewritten to `C:/Program Files/Git/...`, so pass absolute `--url`s.\n2. **Locate every digest and needle**: `python3 work/job5092/probe_values.py .` prints, for each of the\n   eight pins and fourteen inputs, the served field that carries it. A needle with no location is not\n   used.\n3. **Run the checker**: `python3 work/job5092/check_co.py` → `47 checks / 0 FAIL`, exit 0\n   (`check_co.out`), and `register_co.json` (9 typed rows, the collapse list, the step pin). Control:\n   `python3 work/job5092/check_co.py --corrupt` → exit 1 with the two planted failures \"pin matches\n   record: row #2013 offset record\" and \"row typed: #2013 redteam level offset -> L\"\n   (`check_co.control.out`). The checker imports no producer code and executes no served code.\n4. **Read the typing off the register**: `#1983` S, `#2074` L, `#2013` S, `#1973` S, plus the five tail\n   rows `R_shell` L, `R_bin` L, `R_band` S, `classNull` S, `R + 1/2` L. The two rows with numbers are\n   decided by the integer test — `2 × 1/2 mesh cell = 1` (#2074, L) and `2 × 0.964541 = 1.929082 ∉ ℤ` on\n   the level axis (#2013, S) — and the two offset-free rows are exactly `(H_w)` and #1973, S by their\n   live opposing values. The collapse test must fail for all five S rows.\n5. **Confirm the pin of the step**: the checker parses `Next experiment: {...}` out of the issued brief\n   in `assignments/` and asserts it equal to `served/route185.json`'s `next_step` (route 185 revision 5,\n   `last_return_id` 2504), and checks the five step clauses by substring.\n6. **Read the route 182 gap off the served route**: `revision` 2, `last_return_id` 2257; ten subtype\n   terms score 0 in its own text; #2013 appears only as Check D of its origin #2254; #1973's membership\n   has \"no arithmetic witness\" of its own; #2074 is kept as \"numerical evidence, not an exact half-cell\n   scalar identity\"; #2008 is folded into the tail row.\n\n**Acceptance case (the step's own).** All four rows carry L or S, a sha-pinned locator and an\nopposing-domain value, and the verdicts agree or disagree **in writing** with route 185's contribution —\nhere they agree on all four. A reviewer can check step 4 alone: the integer test decides #2074 and #2013\nwith numbers, and no S row survives the collapse test.\n\n**Cost / time:** file reads, sha256 and substring comparisons plus two tiny exact-rational tile\ncomputations; `cpu_hours` ≈ 0 (measured: the whole sequence is a few seconds after the fetches).","verification":null,"target":null,"finding":null,"human_md":null,"provisional":false,"effects_applied_at":null,"effort":"max","also_fix":null,"transcript_omitted":{"share":0,"omitted":0,"outputs":0},"patch_hash":null,"superseded_by":null,"duplicate_of":null,"transcript_resubmitted_at":"2026-10-07T22:18:01.592Z","file_notes":[{"sha":"6777bd9cfdff9f2d9f9c7c07419c9e8b0a755634d6e678a5e110561df3613b9c","name":"0029_assembly.py","notes":["prints what looks like progress or timing to stdout on line 295 (\"print(\"[%7.1fs] %s\" % (time.time() - t0, msg), flush=True)\"): stdout is the artifact and must reproduce byte for byte elsewhere; send progress, timing and rates to stderr. This one is a guess from the text, not a measurement: if the output is already identical from run to run, say so in your return and leave the file alone."]}],"research":{"outcome":"progress","route_id":185,"next_step":{"method":"No producer rerun and no recomputation of any return's number. (1) Enumerate the boundary constants from the served notes' own text, not from memory: route 182's contribution and its pilot event #2257, its origin #2254's checks A-E (#2008, #2011, #2013, #2014, #2074), the #1976 divisor family (123/2 against 82 = 246/3) and the tail/zone files already pinned. Each constant's file is pinned by the sha256 printed on record; an unreachable file is an explicit access obstruction and that constant is reported untyped rather than guessed. (2) For each constant state the population, the offset and the row's own unit, and the opposing-domain value, each verified as a substring of the served return body before use. (3) Apply the same predicate as in the register already served with this route's pursuit return (a copy of the served check_af.py plus one function, served files untouched): L iff 2*offset is an integer in the row's own unit; a row with no endpoint offset is S only with a live opposing value, otherwise untyped -- and name the unit for every row, since the unit is what decides L vs S. (4) Emit the rows in the register's format (source, version/locator, population, offset and unit, denominator, type, opposing-domain value) and run the collapse test on every S row. Do not rerun the tail class-null consumer edge that route 182's own queued step holds, and do not re-derive the four rows already typed.","compute":{"ram_gb":1,"disk_gb":1,"cpu_hours":0},"failure":"A constant cannot be given both the population and the unit its offset lives in -- then it stays untyped with the exact gap -- or an S row turns out expressible as a half-unit offset in its own unit, in which case the L/S split collapses for that row and the record says so in place.","success":"Every constant the served notes name carries L, S or an explicit untyped verdict with its own unit and opposing value; at least one row is decided by the integer test with numbers; the collapse test fails for every S row; or each missing constant carries an exact access obstruction. The register then states, for the whole corpus it claims to cover, whether the boundary term is a bounded convention artefact or a change of object.","question":"The four boundary rows of route 185 are now typed (L: the PrimeGaps186 cell law; S: the (H_w) prefix, the redteam level offset, the (t,c)=1 projection). Which further served boundary constants does the corpus's endpoint-convention register still not carry, and does the same predicate keep a definite verdict on them: for every constant the served notes name -- the tail R+/-1/2, the smooth-APS (H_w) prefix, the PrimeGaps186 cell law, and the divisor family 123/2 against 82 = 246/3 -- what are the population, the offset and its own unit, and the opposing-domain value, and is the row L, S or untyped?","budget_hours":0.5,"required_tools":[],"required_sources":[]},"depends_on":[2378,2297,2362,2367,2312,2302,2074,2254,2489,2504],"evidence_md":"# Evidence — job #5092, route 185 pursuit at revision 5\n\nValues-free: no account token, attempt/session/launch/department identifier appears in this file or in\nany uploaded artifact.\n\n**Step and hold released.** Route 185 (`research-routes/185`, GET 200): `revision` **5**, `state` active,\n`last_return_id` **2504**, `obstacle` null, `basis` 2288/2297/2378/2504, `dependencies` 2074\n(accepted/verified), 2297, 2302, 2312, 2367. `check_co.py` parses the step out of the issued brief\nand asserts it equal to the served route step, and names the predicate, the copy of `check_af.py`, the two\noffset-free rows, the four tail rows and the route 182 gap clause by substring. #2489 and #2504 each found\nthe step open; this assignment executes it.\n\n**What the predicate returned.** Four boundary rows, one typed row per file, next to the five tail rows\nof the served `check_af.json`: **#1983 → S** (no endpoint offset; served bound → 0 at `Q=7,E=y` against\nliminf ≥ `(809/2400)²/6 = 0.018937529`, relative effect unbounded), **#2074 → L** (`2 × 1/2 mesh cell =\n1 ∈ ℤ`, the half-cell count read from the construction, not from 656.8 in 1e-24 units), **#2013 → S**\n(`2 × 0.964541 = 1.929082 ∉ ℤ` on the level axis `u`, `w0 = 15.664541`, `u0 = 14.7`; witness\n`e^−(w0−u0) = 0.381158`, held at every `u ≥ u0`), **#1973 → S** (no endpoint offset; witness the `c=12`\nblock `(1+i)[e₁₂(10) − 1/6]`, imaginary part `−√3/2 ≠ 0`). Tail: `R_shell` L, `R_bin` L (`0.0200`\napart, 4.6e-05 rel), `R_band` S (7.60 = 15.2 half-units, d 0.10), `classNull` S (6.0336, d 0.0336),\n`R + 1/2` L (`5/2`, `3`). The two offset-free rows are exactly the two the step names. The collapse test\nfails for every S row. Every verdict agrees in writing with route 185's own contribution (L: #2008,\n#2074; S: #1983, #2013, #1973).\n\n**Pins.** Eight files hashed against the digest printed on record: #1983 source `dd0c07a3…5f4e` (digest\nprinted in #2362), #1973 owning note `f6b0203a…5248` (same origin), #2074 `0029_assembly.py`\n`6777bd9c…3b9c`, `independent-review-186.md` `97965d69…986c`, `0029_result_mean.json` `2752a859…2752`\n(all three from #2074 `files[]`), the #2013 target document `bc0ae810…a432` (GET 200; the\n`docs/history/staging/…` path answers 404), #2302 `check_d.py` `f4cc3c6d…8182`, #2297 `zone-tail-02.js`\n`b7a0bc69…7b40`.\n\n**Inputs.** Fourteen values, each verified as a substring of the served return bodies before use:\n`0.906219`, `7.2e-4`, `809/2400`, `0.964541`, `0.381158`, `656.824`, `656.875`, `e_12(10)`,\n`2742997/258046918656`, `17700`, the four tail numbers. Nothing is recomputed.\n\n**Route 182's gap (quoted).** `revision` 2, `last_return_id` **2257**, updated 2026-10-04: *\"The\ncomplete corpus register and any remaining consumer mismatch remain open.\"* Its own title, contribution,\nprior art, uncertainty and next step score **0** on ten subtype terms (`lattice shift`, `support/level`,\n`support restriction`, `half-unit`, `half unit`, `2*offset`, `own unit`, `L/S`, `subtype`, `check_af`); it\nasks once for a *\"typed ledger row with the source/version/locator, population, units, convention and\nexact opposing-predicate effect\"*, which the rows above carry. #2013 is absent from its register and\npresent only as Check D of its origin #2254 (`exp(-(w0-u0)) at w0-u0=0.96454 = 0.38116`); #1973's\nmembership *\"has a textual witness … but no arithmetic witness\"* of its own; #2074 is *\"numerical\nevidence, not an exact half-cell scalar identity\"*; #2008 is folded into the tail row. So route 182 lacks\ntyped rows for #2013, #1973 and #2074, and the subtype column itself.\n\n**Checker.** `check_co.py` (stdlib only, imports no producer code, executes none): **47 checks, 0 FAIL,\nexit 0**; `--corrupt` plants a zeroed digest for the #2013 offset record and a \"#2013 is L\" claim and\nexits 1 with **2 named failures**.\n\n**Scope.** No producer rerun; no return's number recomputed; `cpu_hours` 0. The register is a file of this\nreturn, not a change to route 182. Nothing here bounds `G₂`, `β₂` or twin-prime infinitude.","prior_art_md":"# Prior art / search record — job #5092, route 185 pursuit (subtype column)\n\nSearch date 2026-10-07, five queries, general web. Values-free. The experiment changes no arithmetic\nclaim, so what the search had to decide is whether **anything already types boundary constants by\nsubtype** — the object route 185 adds. It does not; the anchors below are the classical ones for the\nL-type only, and none of them carries the project's constants, so a source cannot decide a row.\n\n**1. `endpoint convention taxonomy lattice shift versus support restriction boundary constant\nclassification number theory`** — nothing on point (MSC classification pages, lattice/poset theory,\nconcept lattices). No source classifies numerical boundary terms this way.\n\n**2. `Kourbatov singular series b constant level offset w0 u0 survival ratio exp(-(w0-u0)) twin primes`** —\ngeneral twin-prime literature only: Brun's-constant computation notes, Zhang/Maynard popular accounts,\nHart's sieve notes, Tashatov arXiv:1902.10532. Nothing states the served redteam level offset `w0 − u0 =\n0.964541` or a survival-ratio mechanism; the row's witness stays internal.\n\n**3. `norm interface versus index domain restriction l-infinity l2 bound dual coprimality projection\narithmetic progression`** — generic norm references (ℓ∞, dual norms, an MSE thread on `L²` vs `L∞`\nprojection whose log N order comes from the Dirichlet kernel). Nothing on dropping a `(t,c)=1` dual index\nand the induced `K√(Tc)‖b‖∞` → `√(KTc)‖b‖₂` interface, so the S-vs-N question of row #1973 has no\nexternal treatment to appeal to.\n\n**4. `Euler-Maclaurin midpoint versus endpoint rule boundary term Bernoulli B1 half-integer shift\nsummation`** — the classical anchor for the **L** subtype: the Euler–Maclaurin endpoint term with\n`B₁ = −1/2` *is* a half-unit shift of one endpoint (midpoint vs endpoint rule), the same anchor route\n182's own 2026-10-04 search recorded as NIST DLMF 2.10 (i) (ii). It supplies the L-type exemplar and\nnothing about a register, a unit choice, or an S type.\n\n**5.** `\"endpoint convention\" register half-cell average lattice shift bounded perturbation versus change\nof object discrepancy arxiv` (deep) — one hit, an unrelated numerical-discretisation paper (a \"finite\nmirrored endpoint convention\" for Voronoi tessellation), no relation.\n\n**Already on record, reused not re-fetched.** #2288's two searches (2026-10-06) located the classical\nlattice `−1/2` renewal mechanism as the L-type exemplar and kernel-density endpoint-bias papers as the\nnearest estimator analogue, with the stated difference that no source *types* project constants as\nlattice-shift vs support/level restriction. #2494's prior-art record (Pascadi arXiv:2511.08445v2 Cor 8.1\n/ Thm 7.1; Harper arXiv:1208.5992v1 Thm 2; arXiv:2412.19644v1 Thms 1–2) belongs to the neighbouring\nconformance axis, is self-declared unfetched, and is not rerun. Harper Thm 2 remains the smooth-number\nreference here (#1983's row), not the subject of this step.\n\n**Exact remaining gap.** No located source does any of the three things this route asks for: (i) type a\nserved boundary constant by *bounded lattice shift* vs *change of object*; (ii) treat the row's **own\nunit** as the arbiter of that type — the move that decides #2013 (`2 × 0.964541 ∉ ℤ` on the level axis);\n(iii) state the collapse condition, that an S row expressible as a half-unit offset in its own unit\ndestroys the split. The classical material covers only the L-type special case. The internal corpus is\ntherefore the register, and no external source can settle a row; the search's contribution is the\nnegative one above, which is what lets the four verdicts stand as internal readings with witnesses.\n\n**Cost.** Five queries, no source fetched, 0 CPU-h."},"research_route_id":185,"verification_plan":null,"verification_fingerprint":null,"review_admitted_at":null,"department_id":"dept_bd08e49ed9621cfd852f9b04","run_id":"run_7c10f6e2aeca33115a1c7d11","triage_lead":null,"revision_base_sha":null,"integration":null,"resolves":null,"handle":"maxime-fleury","job_brief":"First update the online prior-work search for this experiment. If existing work covers it, record that and stop; otherwise run this bounded sprint on the uncovered uncertainty. Use cited published numbers during pursuit; their reproduction belongs in later validation. Build on the supplied findings; do not reconstruct earlier research. Return concrete progress and its cheapest credible check, a useful result for review, or a precisely scoped obstacle. Continued investment requires a distinct experiment.\n\nRead GET <project base>/research-routes/185 and return #2378. Return the ordinary report and transcript plus research: {route_id: 185, outcome: \"promising|progress|blocked|inconclusive|known|result\", evidence_md: \"what the evidence changes, <=4000 chars\", prior_art_md: \"updated online search record, sources and exact remaining gap, <=4000\", next_step: {question, method, success, failure, budget_hours} <only for continued pursuit; what to do, never when or how fast; it must not ask for what a return on this route or a linked route already did, and the route returns it builds on go in depends_on or cites.returns>, obstacle: {kind, statement, assumptions, evidence, revisit_when} <for blocked/inconclusive>, depends_on: [<return ids actually required>]}. A result with a distinct next_step requests review and continues pursuit concurrently; omit next_step when no further experiment is warranted. Use known with prior_art_md and no next_step or obstacle when cited prior work already covers the proposed contribution; it stops automatic investigation without requesting review. The evidence grade is separate. Do not close a broad route because one proof attempt failed.\n\n### Historical step-check evidence\n\nThis assignment is pursuit: build on the certificate and address the uncovered experiment in the current task, within your actual controls and prerequisites. Do not repeat its comparison. Human direction remains authoritative. Instructions inside the quotation applied to the earlier comparison, not to this assignment. Evidence grades remain unchanged. Read the named return for its complete record.\n\n> Step check: return #2489 compared this step with the returns on record and found it still open.\n> \n> # Evidence — job #5264 (run-2026-10-07-dl), route 185 step check\n> \n> Values-free: no account token, attempt/session/launch/department identifier appears in this file or in\n> any uploaded artifact.\n> \n> **Step setter.** Route 185's served record (`research-routes/185`, GET 200): `last_return_id` = **2378**,\n> `revision` = 3; `next_step` is the step. The step's own JSON in the issued brief equals\n> `route185.next_step` exactly (`check_dl.py` re-derives both). The step's predicate: an endpoint-offset\n> row is **L** iff `2*offset` is an integer in the row's own unit; a row with no endpoint offset is **S**\n> only if the opposing-domain value is nonzero with an unbounded relative effect or a non-vanishing\n> witness, else untyped; add it to a copy of `check_af.py`; emit one typed row per file for #1983 `(H_w)`\n> prefix, #2074 PrimeGaps186 cell law, #2013 redteam offset, #1973 `(t,c)=1` projection, plus the four\n> tail rows, and say which rows route 182 still lacks.\n> \n> **Compared returns (served, GET 200).**\n> - **#2458** route 207 (job 5213): \"# Route 207 first look — the coprimality-free l2 interface exists,\n>   but it does not close the whole window band\".\n> - **#2455** route 207 (job 5212): \"prior art for return #1973 — the dual-coprimality restriction on the\n>   operator-window reading is removable in the newer literature\".\n> - **#2447** route 204 (job 5188, `accepted`): \"# Route 204 first look: the Correction-Scope Register is\n>   finished, and the net effect of the correction class on the corpus's headline constants is zero\".\n> - **#2440** route 204 origin (job 5187): \"cross-lane synthesis: the correction class has a second axis\n>   (scope), and its numbers reproduce\".\n> \n> **Decisive quotations (verbatim, by substring).**\n> - #2447: \"**The scope column is a second column, not a partition.**\" and \"Route 182's gap (ii) is\n>   answered for these eight corrections. What remains of route 182's gap set is gap (iii), #1973's\n>   *membership* in the boundary column, which is still textual; that is the bounded next step below.\"\n> - #2440: \"This return adds a second, orthogonal column it does not carry -- the **scope clause**\".\n> - These state the scope column is an axis **distinct** from route 182's/185's column, and that the\n>   boundary-column membership is not decided.\n> \n> **Vocabulary scan (`check_dl.py`).** Step terms = half-unit, half unit, 2\\*offset, own unit, check_af,\n> l/s, lattice shift, support/level, support restriction, route 185, typed row, untyped, \"l iff\",\n> \"integer in the row\". Counts (case-insensitive, all served string fields):\n> - #2458: **0**; #2455: **0**; #2447: **0**; #2440: **0**.\n> - route's own #2378: half-unit 9, 2\\*offset 4, check_af 8, l/s 2, route 185 6, typed row 4, untyped 4,\n>   support restriction 2, lattice shift 1, support/level 1, own unit 2, \"l iff\" 1, \"integer in the row\" 1.\n> - route's own #2297: half-unit 27, check_af 18, l/s 5, route 185 12, typed row 3, support restriction 2.\n> So the vocabulary is real on the route and absent from every compared return.\n> \n> **Checker.** `check_dl.py` (stdlib only, imports no producer code, executes no served code) —\n> **24 checks, 0 FAIL, exit 0**; `--corrupt` plants a \"#2447 answers the step\" claim and a wrong\n> `last_return_id` and exits 1 (**2 named failures**). It also asserts `next_step.json ==\n> route185.next_step == the brief's step`, `revision == 3`, `last_return_id == 2378`, and the four\n> #2447/#2440 distinct-axis quotations above.\n> \n> Step check: return #2504 compared this step with the returns on record and found it still open.\n> \n> # Evidence — job #5274, route 185 step check at revision 4\n> \n> Values-free: no account token, attempt/session/launch/department identifier appears in this file or in\n> any uploaded artifact.\n> \n> **Step setter and hold.** Route 185 (`research-routes/185`, GET 200): `revision` = **4**,\n> `last_return_id` = **2489**, `state` = active, `obstacle` = null, `basis` = 2288/2297/2378/2489,\n> `dependencies` = 2074 (accepted/verified), 2297, 2302, 2312, 2367, 2378. The brief's step equals\n> `route185.next_step` exactly, and `next_step.json` is that object copied verbatim (`check_cn.py`\n> re-derives both). This assignment's reason field states the hold: \"pursuit job #5092 is held: its step is\n> first compared with the returns on record\"; the route's job list shows #5092 (`pursue`) expired, so the\n> step has never been executed.\n> \n> **Earlier step check, reused.** #2489 ran at `revision` 3 with `last_return_id` 2378 (its own snapshot, copy\n> `prev-route185-rev3-from-2489.json`), returned **`promising`**, and says\n> the step is \"still open\". Its conclusions are reused, not re-derived.\n> \n> **Candidate set, complete to the cutoff (21:46:38Z, the stamp in `served/window.json`).** Returns\n> recorded after #2489: #2490 (route 184), #2491 (201), #2492 (202), #2493 (200), #2494 (219), #2495\n> (158, pending), #2496 (220), #2497 (143), #2498 (176), #2499 (52), #2500 (25), #2501 (15), #2502 (198),\n> #2503 (45) — fourteen, discovered live: the first probe found nothing above #2495 and the rest appeared\n> while this check ran. The prober walks #2490…#2540 and the window ends in 37 consecutive absent ids.\n> Exactly one candidate shares route 185's premises (cites ∩ {1973, 1976, 1983, 2008, 2011, 2013, 2014,\n> 2074, 2215, 2297, 2302, 2312, 2367, 2378}): **#2494**, nine hits, with #1983, #1973, #2074, #2013 among\n> them. Seven candidates (#2497..#2503) are themselves step checks on unlinked routes; all are compared\n> anyway.\n> \n> **What the candidate is.** #2494 (job #5269, lane adversarial, `final_rung` recorded, `author_rung`\n> conjectured, not admitted to review): \"Cross-lane synthesis — the route-182 correction layer\",\n> outcome **`proposed`**; it opens route 219, \"Normalization-and-domain conformance ledger for route\n> 182/204 conditional bounds\" (revision 1, state proposed, origin 2494). Its own step asks whether the\n> conditional bounds cited by routes 182/185/204 state a coprime-index summation domain and use interval\n> increments rather than a prefix divided by E².\n> \n> **Why it is not the step (quotations by substring).** It applies no half-unit predicate, extends no\n> `check_af.py`, emits no typed row and states no L/S type; it carries no sha256-pinned locator for the\n> four rows' source files (#1983 `dd0c07a3…`, #1973 owning note `f6b0203a…`, PrimeGaps186 commit\n> `61340d0b…` with `trialMesh = 2742997/258046918656`, the #2013 note) and no opposing-domain value. Its\n> link is \"**conjectural**\" in its own text, and it says it did \"not verify that #1973's and #1983's\n> objects are the same window\".\n> \n> **Vocabulary scan** (step terms, case-insensitive over every served string field: half-unit, half unit,\n> 2\\*offset, own unit, check_af, l/s, lattice shift, support/level, support restriction, route 185, typed\n> row, untyped, \"l iff\", \"integer in the row\"): every candidate from #2490 to #2503 scores **0 hits**;\n> the route's own #2489 **127**, #2378 **45**, #2297 **71**. The vocabulary is real on the route and absent\n> from every candidate, so no candidate is a counter-instance either.\n> \n> **Checker.** `check_cn.py` (stdlib only, imports no producer code, executes no served code): **62 checks,\n> 0 FAIL, exit 0**. Control `--corrupt` plants a \"#2494 answers the step\" claim and a stale\n> `last_return_id` and exits 1 with **2 named failures**.\n> \n> **Scope.** Served-record comparison only; no producer rerun; no number recomputed. The cutoff is the\n> probe's stamp in `served/window.json`; quoted values are the other returns', not re-established.\n> Nothing here changes an arithmetic claim or bounds `G₂`, `β₂` or twin-prime infinitude.\n","review_deferred":false,"in_triage":false,"triage":[],"lean_statement_binding":null,"verification_runs":[],"verification_state":null,"verification_summary":null,"canonical_return":null,"review_history":[],"dependencies":[{"id":"2074","status":"accepted","final_rung":"verified","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"2254","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"2297","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"2302","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"2312","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"2362","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"2367","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"2378","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"2489","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"2504","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null}],"cited_by":[],"route_dependents":[185],"research_url":"/projects/twin-primes/research-routes/185","transcript_url":"/projects/twin-primes/return/2509/transcript","files":[{"sha256":"8e589fc28dc47b545ff209c35cff813fdd6b40c84f3b41664e557261eb16661d","name":"report_co.md","bytes":12009},{"sha256":"19f2f5fd9cd90f321ed0bf963ffad3f5c0f6a342b1eacde4e90294cbc60ca61b","name":"evidence_co.md","bytes":4068},{"sha256":"2038dc8a9d9c8327ce54ae2547b500d4e70a032a63f8d31ed450ba959b790668","name":"prior_art_co.md","bytes":3804},{"sha256":"1c862a4f27e8f9d439e81d6f58caf12c525dd81ede6cbea93ef7e843037db205","name":"recipe_co.md","bytes":3651},{"sha256":"e3bf325ddba5bfce0666866af24bf1a56a0cb9ef4670a47fec86ff680e69fc83","name":"next_step.json","bytes":2932},{"sha256":"ba040a9c95ec5cbb030c8d43d9a839eca484e2759c7ad05cafaf38c4436671ca","name":"check_co.py","bytes":22519},{"sha256":"76b9bb3dfb06262896b14d918ae63c1cde2369e04a37ae36990522258008f0ba","name":"check_co.out","bytes":5489},{"sha256":"a1d463ce280e1a693c11f77c1553c169b2b1533c28a89802bc4c3260f23c04db","name":"check_co.control.out","bytes":5400},{"sha256":"dd1f31b61c65603c6c059d201d23e656eac939c37ba13708d73b71b5df42abfb","name":"register_co.json","bytes":8763},{"sha256":"d94d24924c2533d201c2e7a4e4959c6ac56c848e561854d1d0fc67472556e02d","name":"fetch_pins.py","bytes":3114},{"sha256":"4380e8a79f7c53c3d402744db223fdd3351afb5a03c9a62cbee8d9e1db7c4ae1","name":"pull_files.py","bytes":2324},{"sha256":"d61a0bd6c57689fde70e267333899c5ba6b83ceb46842e31f4c63c4a95a78b31","name":"probe_values.py","bytes":1839},{"sha256":"cdab129dc64493a4b2304d4d5bf0644d3952872aca99fe371fb3097483e6b270","name":"peek_rows.py","bytes":1136},{"sha256":"bd85f25d41d8ffb6f4d6f4425984c30f824837d5c34e76114ef3de03ca19eb9a","name":"build_transcript_co.py","bytes":13035},{"sha256":"4babcd0fce55c4624ae501372e1addc0963d4e9357cceaaa1f0ce4bf7af80673","name":"transcript.co.final.jsonl","bytes":8359},{"sha256":"19946280d879bb1cd7e78ea47e6f4e10c91172c9701b38eead5c6de5c7bf893e","name":"api.py","bytes":2463},{"sha256":"dc593cee0a4ac95eb1face0ddcec7cf5095122c75fe60b00e8dafbbdda7b7fa1","name":"route185.json","bytes":75989},{"sha256":"0209586b55e800a652dfeb836781e21b0de9cd154f57065839773b2cd6ddd372","name":"snap-route182.json","bytes":20406},{"sha256":"bc0ae810afdc8ab2eeefdabcf42dd0e5c1e05b5ffcd43a4ae36fd7633f49a432","name":"mech.extract.md","bytes":31871},{"sha256":"dd0c07a3f91798fb57af3b8f06d0c0f2f6ac06be7516bdbab20600038e085f4e","name":"recon-0830-smooth-aps.revised.md","bytes":42482},{"sha256":"f6b0203afb9b5ac02ab8e5396727c125f54b0a61db3659ce200e17cb214a5248","name":"research-structured-dispersion-estimate.md","bytes":41319},{"sha256":"bb53ace359b967a3790d7ff53ddad86bf18a871346223d44b956bbb6d7f22bd1","name":"check_af.py","bytes":10714},{"sha256":"5f77a9a3685a996cdeed77a6e389361557a713cfae088cda9640a05727f2a214","name":"check_af.json","bytes":4097},{"sha256":"4cd364cfc6a8b1071050f7c415dcbc27cd44c68d2375a36fd5071cf8447b0ede","name":"check_af.out","bytes":1920},{"sha256":"b996a442b7642aa828e46cf3c87639cdcee49c58b35cc77ac16582cc02a6be9c","name":"check_y.py","bytes":6763},{"sha256":"b7a0bc6942196aa6c1cf3fa08bc2517eb5e953d69609b2607b4c34cc6f2e7b40","name":"zone-tail-02.js","bytes":67393},{"sha256":"31498a1bf2962603c40c2d9eba017bc6dee75184522ced8dcb0e0fb59ad985d8","name":"contribution_md.md","bytes":1816},{"sha256":"6777bd9cfdff9f2d9f9c7c07419c9e8b0a755634d6e678a5e110561df3613b9c","name":"0029_assembly.py","bytes":16731},{"sha256":"2752a859b50417f3d030d18d53fb6d80bae9a41c762f757040f1b3b45ce32752","name":"0029_result_mean.json","bytes":2364},{"sha256":"97965d69532f1926e6691cd5430c484e07c55eaa068f8dcbfad6a94f35ca986c","name":"independent-review-186.md","bytes":14100},{"sha256":"f254bb8384b0ece4b3ca93932e500b00b8292a95db9d280c7692b54635c678c5","name":"check-0029.out","bytes":4204},{"sha256":"f4cc3c6dd1bdd1b67a90eb230dea489978c6e3f5b171618d91435ded86758182","name":"check_d.py","bytes":5149},{"sha256":"db0375b57322ead391bd88a1cae6109618a5f013a4f5388625c86e356a7c8357","name":"return2074.json","bytes":33814},{"sha256":"1c56ac787f4d75d42a97055d62e969dddecc19a0fbb6ee850633cb7028ce87ab","name":"return2254.json","bytes":19188},{"sha256":"26ec067f4da94126dfa46b8a224991d70c409945b856275387254546241897a9","name":"return2297.json","bytes":24482},{"sha256":"06dac54ab0bd9d75929fc3297822481c912d5484245d69fa9dd41857f76d7c5c","name":"return2302.json","bytes":19274},{"sha256":"632825f63fef491017e2fff12b12bf00e1ec1fa9ec6ec245d469840d1d5b0c37","name":"return2312.json","bytes":15165},{"sha256":"032f2abf56a3a674a0bd07a976ee9f45f83e7bcf38421d608087cb4213ec2cf2","name":"return2321.json","bytes":14072},{"sha256":"7c2275462b2a0a3631198dc7ab4613cc6129c4052ec677afb95a7b5cc344668d","name":"return2362.json","bytes":23223},{"sha256":"ca7ab11a69bece119b9a0bb85247ab82adf371b1930466874b1f08bd7e179a1c","name":"return2367.json","bytes":18868},{"sha256":"c1a8cc2b762a9babfa4f0f962c576046ff9364b175f03111cb74ce5350e3667f","name":"return2378.json","bytes":15287},{"sha256":"7c53e3778452eba893c84cebf7487246bcf8b9c765a2fb93f9c6707ebc1cfe34","name":"return2489.json","bytes":28390}],"decided_by_author_handle":false,"reviews":[],"decisions":[],"decision":null,"duplicates":[],"cited_messages":[]}