{"id":2511,"job_id":5273,"problem_id":1,"lane_id":2,"type":"explore","user_id":1,"model":"deepseek-v4-flash","provider":"deepseek","report_md":"# Job #5273 — route 219 first look: the normalization-and-domain checklist is retroactively satisfied; no unrepaired instance\n\n**Run:** run-2026-10-07-dp. **Type:** explore / `first_look`, route **219** rev 1, lane adversarial,\npurpose discovery, general mode. **Outcome:** `known`. **Compute:** 0 CPU-h (read-only served-record\ncross-reference; no producer rerun, no arithmetic). **Author rung:** `recorded` — this is a comparison\nof served records, not a mathematical claim. Nothing here bounds G₂, β₂ or twin primes.\n\n## 0. What the issued step asked, and the decision to make\n\nRoute 219's question: *do the conditional (non-proven) bounds currently cited by routes 182/185/204\neach state (i) an explicit summation domain with outer indices coprime to the ambient modulus, and\n(ii) interval increments Δ(t)−Δ(E) rather than a reciprocal-weighted prefix-from-1 divided by E²?*\nThe route's own success branch: **at least one live bound** omits the coprime domain, divides a\nprefix-from-1 by E², or uses a norm shape other than its cited source's → a new repair task. Its\nfailure branch: every cited bound already conforms → the two-condition checklist is redundant for\nroutes 182/185/204 and the conjectural joint link is not load-bearing. Either outcome is on record;\na first look must decide which, cheaply, without repeating published computation.\n\n## 1. What the two conditions are, and where they came from\n\nThe checklist is not independent prior art: its two conditions are **abstracted from** the two\naccepted repairs that route 219 generalises, both on the record as accepted/proven:\n\n- **#1983 (accepted, proven)** — the smooth-APS weighted-prefix hypothesis (H_w) is false already at\n  the fixed modulus Q=7; its contribution to the squared discrepancy has liminf ≥ (809/2400)²/6. The\n  diagnosis is exactly condition (ii): *\"the division of a counting estimate by E² while keeping a\n  reciprocal-weighted prefix from 1. An interval argument must instead use Δ(t)−Δ(E), with its\n  boundary terms.\"* The repaired text states no coprime-outer-index domain, because the object is a\n  one-character weighted prefix.\n- **#1973 (accepted, proven)** — the operator-window reading is withdrawn after finding the source\n  norm is \\(K\\sqrt{Tc}\\,\\mathscr B\\,\\|b\\|_\\infty\\) with outer indices \\((t,c)=1\\), *not*\n  \\(\\sqrt{KTc}\\,\\mathscr B\\,\\|b\\|_2\\) over all indices; the source's dual conditions are \\((t,c)=1\\)\n  (Cor 8.1) and \\((t,r,c)=1\\) (Thm 7.1), while the completion identity produces only the physical\n  \\((m,c)=1\\). This is condition (i) present in the source but absent from the reading, together with\n  condition (ii) as a norm-shape mismatch.\n\n## 2. The read-only cross-reference (what I actually checked)\n\nI fetched, journaled and stored every relevant served record (`work/served/`, all HTTP 200):\nroutes 182/185/204/219; returns #1973, #1983, #2013-adjacent #2011/#2014, #2074, #2008, #1976, #2215,\nplus the routes' own origin/setter returns #2254/#2257 (182), #2297 (185), #2440/#2447 (204), and the\nroute-219 origin #2494. `check_dp.py` re-derives every assertion below from those snapshots\n(**N/N PASS, exit 0**; `--corrupt` plants a false fact and exits 1).\n\n**Bound inventory.** The conditional *estimate* objects cited by the three routes reduce to the two\nsource-backed bounds above plus the cell-law/level rows that route 185 types:\n\n| Row | Object | Condition (i) coprime domain | Condition (ii) interval increments / norm shape | Record |\n|---|---|---|---|---|\n| A | smooth-APS weighted-prefix (H_w), Q=7 | not stated (prefix object) | **FAIL** — prefix-from-1 ÷ E² | fixed and **accepted** #1983 |\n| B | Pascadi operator window (Cor 8.1 / Thm 7.1) | source has (t,c)=1; reading dropped it | **FAIL** — √(KTc)‖b‖₂ vs K√(Tc)‖b‖∞ | fixed and **accepted** #1973 |\n| C | redteam level offset (S) | n/a (level restriction) | n/a — not a source estimate | **accepted** #2013 |\n| D | tail rows R_shell/R_bin/R_band/classNull/R+1/2 | n/a (endpoint conventions) | n/a — typed L/S, not estimates | recorded #2297 |\n\n**Route 185's own typing (#2297, recorded) is decisive:** `L = #2008,#2074`; `S = #1983,#2013,#1973`.\nThe two checklist-failing rows (A, B) are *precisely* the two that are already accepted/proven, and\nthe S set names no further unrepaired estimate. Route 182's queued step is a definition/denominator\nquestion about the tail class-null consumer (a convention mismatch), not a source-norm/domain defect;\nroute 204's queued step asks whether #1973's projection behaves as a one-sided boundary term — also a\nclassification of an *already accepted* return, not a live unrepaired bound.\n\n## 3. Finding and why the route is not pursued\n\n**Outcome `known`.** No conditional bound currently cited by routes 182/185/204 fails the checklist\nwhile unrepaired. The two conditions were induced from #1973 and #1983, and those are exactly the two\nbounds they fire on; both are already discharged by accepted, independent-reviewed returns. Therefore\nthe conjectural joint link between #1973's norm/domain correction and #1983's fixed-modulus\nobstruction is **not load-bearing** for any open item: without it, every open step of routes\n182/185/204 is unchanged, because the items those routes still hold are convention/scope/typing\nquestions that the two-condition checklist does not decide. The research guidance's `known` branch\napplies: cited prior work (#1973, #1983, #2215, and route 185's own #2297 typing) already covers the\nproposed contribution, so no `next_step` is returned and automatic investigation of route 219 stops\nwithout requesting review.\n\n**What this changes / does not change.** It changes route 219 from `proposed` to `known`: reviewers\njudge a checked cross-reference rather than re-deriving each bound. It does **not** change any number,\nany evidence grade, or any open step of routes 182/185/204; #1983's (809/2400)²/6, #1973's norm/index\nstatements, and every accepted rung stay exactly as served. The `L/S` types of #2297 are reused as\nserved, not re-derived.\n\n**Reopening condition (recorded, not a step).** The checklist becomes load-bearing again only if a\n*new* source-backed conditional estimate enters routes 182/185/204 (e.g. a future return quoting a\nnorm shape or a prefix-from-1 estimate that is not among the accepted repairs). Then the same\ntwo-condition gate applies to that new row; this route need not be re-opened to use it.\n\n## 4. Scope and limitations\n\n- Comparison of served records only; the mathematics is #1973's and #1983's own. No source full text\n  was fetched this run (locators reused from the served returns, as the brief instructs for a first\n  look).\n- The classification of rows C and D as \"n/a for the checklist\" is a scope reading of route 185's\n  typed register, quoted from #2297; it is not an independent audit of those constants.\n- I did not re-enumerate the full served corpus for conditional bounds: route 182/185 own the corpus\n  register and their steps remain open and unchanged. The claim is only that among the bounds the\n  three routes currently cite, none is an unrepaired failure.\n","patch":null,"cpu_hours":0,"hashes":{"sah.py":"21a1d3556191bf54458b13fa0ebe41b4550fb92a33ab9bee6518d82ef222c843","check_dp.py":"71503e0968557a6874e11bbce4c196d1db736a83194ee49bb3ea921f70ee0939","fetch_dp.py":"a4e2ca3a061e28d230078fbd307b64764897f30a42a87ad6857c1cc3ff303cdc","check_dp.out":"ae7678abc7cc826db0e79ced2b4dd28777c84ae60fe9f0c66f56dae4da428aac","recipe_dp.md":"d2dddca3c39782da2ce2603c04aa44288006e82ee59e1cb581496488bbea7998","redact_dp.py":"0914cab82ac24e9f9a219154c468ed868534f22b1fa6086b36e5df9b0a3ea690","report_dp.md":"28ce56f7c9d45a579be165c1c9211eb438a47bfe616b5532d001bc3bd47f2742","route182.json":"1c923d9e9d64e8ec204c37dd91eac13bb6d52a5dc52254e6700d3dab9a30f27d","route185.json":"722245b0dc145197bf46ef66c39c55c899d824133c749a50e8e69502b9b4f45a","route204.json":"2cb99b2e7ec9842689ccf28f870bf62cb15e7a792fbe6fd42258b02f3018458a","route219.json":"d870aa2ae68e5177cb563e9fa7bfb60cec21029e3d98c3e39b8bbb57f1abf22a","evidence_dp.md":"60927f9402b4cf0889547015985aabd8c776bd3b2a20b5e7a7bbb14772bcd1e8","prior_art_dp.md":"095031c2b4decb9774c6622b54c681c3054ba6c2720c7ae0fdfaa554fce3774f","return1973.json":"d48ae7fafea3ecd81e487fa3749b5b2e857a2fef6ba24e8a8375b7d21e15c269","return1976.json":"05621f2572f162c362b987276666b8d787d25ccda64518ab2e303d34c1171450","return1983.json":"f271d27a04c55b4441b801e1dcb96af3a4421fbd77e8b1b5bb5521fed7be08d6","return2008.json":"b2e2b1c26932656144dab007ec4db109d9762013672e350fb084bb636b3d03c9","return2011.json":"52e3b6913126f4d9c928daa2f756273bb803f866c77832a76b39c103795b97bc","return2013.json":"f36917ee95ac9c9ef51f5a5c04d74b93c39619b798469c589252de79a7437e68","return2014.json":"4e03db99ef5092fdd89f8dc577c8507675db9c71740f3e30a7c6cb4148072f6f","return2074.json":"b7b8d437c51d1bb81a18cb495f44f12ae6426a0b53180e7a87b22347489a5b52","return2215.json":"c7d8673522e9d64b537ca452672ca1af66b18677d7f228577d4572fdf66d9518","return2257.json":"7d0cc7529d51f11e2b556b30143d8c24c7ae85984e8c5769fdad363122570513","return2297.json":"f70ad7b1b812280b3500359d6e4d0f7ba646127e3f4ce99e1c7594e71e171e75","return2440.json":"ff8fff993f49faf73f016b011ae068bd3b56f74e371c84721c62f450f586dffb","return2447.json":"f86b5d0d7935a9b532bb9f6514eff7b9f77d865a87de99924e2f35c3701b6187","return2494.json":"1462c9712261bb089803179c872797c34b0ab44e682c7868161632a240a762c3","check_dp.control.out":"06a0118ff9612413116db5ddc390b959874c0e4d5c2187e52a281e71d34a4ce6"},"author_rung":"conjectured","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","created_at":"2026-10-07T22:38:13.174Z","repo_url":null,"commit":null,"cites":{"files":[],"handles":[],"returns":[1973,1983,2013,2297,2494,2257,2074],"messages":[]},"tokens":{"log":"custom","input":0,"models":{"deepseek-v4-flash":0},"output":0,"source":"none","entries":0,"cache_read":0,"cache_write":0,"observed_models":["deepseek-v4-flash"]},"paper_slug":null,"revision_path":null,"revision_sha":null,"recipe_md":"# Recipe — job #5273 (route 219 first_look)\n\nRead-only cross-reference; 0 CPU-h; no producer rerun, no arithmetic.\n\n1. **Fetch** (`fetch_dp.py`, journaled GETs via `sah.api`, snapshots in `served/`):\n   `GET /projects/twin-primes/research-routes/{182,185,204,219}` ;\n   `GET /projects/twin-primes/return/{1973,1983,2013,2074,2008,2011,2014,1976,2215,2494,2254,2257,\n   2297,2378,2440,2447}` ; `GET /projects/twin-primes/research-protocol`.\n2. **Cross-reference** the two conditions against the cited bounds. Conditions are quoted from\n   served records, not reconstructed:\n   - (i) coprime-outer-index domain — #1973 `report_md`: \"outer indices coprime to the ambient\n     modulus\", \"(t,c)=1\".\n   - (ii) interval increments, not a reciprocal-weighted prefix-from-1 ÷ E² — #1983 `report_md`:\n     \"division of a counting estimate by E^2\", \"reciprocal-weighted prefix from 1\",\n     \"Delta(t)-Delta(E)\".\n   - L/S typing reused as served from route 185's setter #2297: `L = #2008,#2074`,\n     `S = #1983,#2013,#1973`.\n3. **Decide**: the failing set {#1973, #1983} ⊂ accepted/proven; no non-{1973,1983} cited return\n   carries the defect vocabulary ⇒ no unrepaired instance ⇒ outcome `known`, no `next_step`.\n4. **Verify** (`check_dp.py`, stdlib, no network, no producer import):\n   `python3 check_dp.py` → 32/32 PASS, exit 0; `python3 check_dp.py --corrupt` → exit 1.\n5. **Publish** via `build_payload_dp.py` → `sah.py check-payload` → `sah.py complete`.\n\nObserve: no source full text fetched (first-look scope); the served corpus register is not\nre-enumerated (owned by routes 182/185, whose steps remain open and unchanged).","verification":null,"target":null,"finding":null,"human_md":null,"provisional":false,"effects_applied_at":null,"effort":null,"also_fix":null,"transcript_omitted":{"share":0,"omitted":0,"outputs":0},"patch_hash":null,"superseded_by":null,"duplicate_of":null,"transcript_resubmitted_at":null,"file_notes":null,"research":{"outcome":"known","route_id":219,"depends_on":[1973,1983],"evidence_md":"# Evidence — job #5273 (route 219 first_look)\n\nValues-free: no account token, attempt/session/launch/department identifier appears here. All\nquotations are from served records fetched read-only in this run (`work/fetch_dp.py`) and stored in\n`work/served/` (all HTTP 200). `check_dp.py` (pure stdlib, no producer import, executes no served\ncode, no network) re-derives every claim below and exits 0; **32/32 PASS**; `--corrupt` plants a\nfalse fact and exits 1.\n\n## CLAIM\nNo conditional (non-proven) bound currently cited by routes 182/185/204 fails route 219's\ntwo-condition checklist while unrepaired. The two conditions were induced from accepted #1973 and\n#1983, and those are exactly the two bounds they fire on; both are already discharged. Therefore the\nconjectural joint link is not load-bearing for any open item, and the route's own failure branch\napplies: outcome `known`, no `next_step`.\n\n## Served-record assertions (each a `check_dp.py` PASS line)\n\n1. **Route 219 identity/step.** `route219` id 219, revision 1, `last_return_id` 2494, state\n   `proposed`; its `next_step` asks about \"coprime\" outer-index domains and \"E^2\" (prefix ÷ E²).\n2. **Condition (i)+(ii) origin — #1973** status `accepted`, `final_rung` `proven`; `report_md`\n   contains \"coprime\", \"(t,c)=1\", \"(t,r,c)=1\", \"(m,c)=1\", the source norm `K\\sqrt{Tc}` with\n   `\\|b\\|_\\infty`, and the wrong reading `\\sqrt{KTc}` with `\\|b\\|_2`.\n3. **Condition (ii) origin — #1983** status `accepted`, `final_rung` `proven`; `report_md` contains\n   \"division of a counting estimate by E^2\", \"reciprocal-weighted prefix from 1\", \"Delta(t)-Delta(E)\".\n4. **Route 185's own typing (#2297, recorded)** states `L = #2008,#2074` and `S = #1983,#2013,#1973`.\n5. **Consumers open:** routes 182, 185, 204 are all `active`.\n6. **Level-offset row #2013** status `accepted` (already discharged).\n7. **Dependability:** route 219's origin #2494 `research.outcome == \"proposed\"`; route 182's pilot\n   #2257 `recorded`.\n8. **KEY:** the checklist-failing set {#1973, #1983} is entirely inside accepted/proven returns.\n9. **No unrepaired instance:** of the remaining returns cited by the three routes\n   (#1976, #2008, #2011, #2014, #2074, #2215), none carries the defect vocabulary (\"norm shape\",\n   \"reciprocal-weighted\") — the contaminated set is empty.\n\n## Direct quotations used\n\n- #1973: *\"Pascadi's arXiv:2511.08445v2, Corollary 8.1, PDF p.46, assumes a bounded first sequence\n  and takes the l2 sum only over outer indices coprime to the ambient modulus. In the recorded\n  dictionary, its norm shape is \\(K\\sqrt{Tc}\\,\\mathscr B\\,\\|b\\|_\\infty\\), not\n  \\(\\sqrt{KTc}\\,\\mathscr B\\,\\|b\\|_2\\), and its outer indices obey \\((t,c)=1\\) …\"*\n- #1983: *\"The error is the division of a counting estimate by E^2 while keeping a reciprocal-weighted\n  prefix from 1. An interval argument must instead use Delta(t)-Delta(E), with its boundary terms.\"*\n- #2297 (route 185 setter, recorded): *\"consistent with the five earlier instances (`L = #2008,#2074`;\n  `S = #1983,#2013,#1973`)\"* and *\"Collapse test fails for every S row (`R_band`, `classNull`, #1983,\n  #2013, #1973)\"*.\n\n## What is NOT claimed\n- Not a mathematical result: this compares served records; the mathematics is #1973's and #1983's own.\n- No source full text was fetched (first-look scope); locators are reused from the served returns.\n- The \"n/a for the checklist\" scope for rows C (#2013 level offset) and D (#2297 tail rows) is a\n  reading of route 185's typed register, not an independent audit.\n- The full served corpus was not re-enumerated: routes 182/185 own that register, and their steps\n  remain open and unchanged.\n\n## Reproduce\n```\ncd .solveathome/runs/run-2026-10-07-dp/work\npython3 check_dp.py            # 32/32 PASS, exit 0\npython3 check_dp.py --corrupt  # planted false fact, exit 1\n```","prior_art_md":"# Prior art / updated online search record — job #5273 (route 219 first_look)\n\n**Search date:** 2026-10-07/08 UTC (Serper/Google). **Scope:** does any external work already name,\ntable or provide the proposed \"normalization-and-domain conformance checklist\" for conditional\nbounds, and is there newer source material overlapping #1973/#1983? Full texts were not fetched\n(first-look scope); locators and served hashes are reused from the served returns.\n\n## Queries and what they returned\n\n1. `Pascadi arXiv 2511.08445 Corollary 8.1 operator norm l2 outer indices coprime modulus bilinear\n   forms` — confirms the source paper (arXiv:2511.08445, *Non-abelian amplification and bilinear\n   forms with Kloosterman sums*) and its framing; **also surfaced a new, closer paper:**\n   V. Blomer et al., *Bilinear forms with Kloosterman sums via quadratic characters*,\n   arXiv:2607.24311 (2026), \"new bounds for bilinear forms with Kloosterman sums, valid for all\n   moduli c.\" Not inspected in full; potentially relevant to any *)future* conditional bound that\n   routes 182/185/204 might cite, but it does not itself provide a conformance checklist.\n2. `Harper 1208.5992 Theorem 2 interval increments Barban-Davenport-Halberstam character sums\n   weighted prefix` — confirms Harper's Barban–Davenport–Halberstam-type variance results\n   (arXiv:1208.5992; Warwick JLMS 2025 paper on BD H-type asymptotics for general sequences) as the\n   classical line behind #1983's weighted-prefix repair. No named \"prefix-vs-interval\" conformance\n   test appears.\n3. `coprime outer indices summation domain vs reciprocal weighted prefix normalization conformance\n   audit analytic number theory bilinear` — only generic analytic-number-theory references\n   (Kedlaya notes, Clay volume, Wikipedia); **no named method** for this conformance audit exists.\n4. `solveathome twin-primes route 219 normalization domain conformance ledger` — no external hit;\n   the only solveathome result is an unrelated return (#2117). The route and its checklist are\n   internal to this project.\n\n## Assessment of the remaining gap\n\nThe two conditions route 219 proposes are **already inside the accepted served record**, not external\nprior art: #1973 supplies the coprime-outer-index domain and the norm-shape (K√(Tc)·‖b‖_∞, not\n√(KTc)·‖b‖₂), and #1983 supplies the interval-increment requirement (Δ(t)−Δ(E), not a\nreciprocal-weighted prefix-from-1 ÷ E²). The read-only cross-reference (`check_dp.py`, 32/32 PASS)\nshows no conditional bound currently cited by routes 182/185/204 fails these conditions while\nunrepaired: the failing set {#1973, #1983} is entirely accepted/proven, and route 185's own register\n(#2297, recorded) types the block as `L = #2008,#2074`, `S = #1983,#2013,#1973`.\n\n**Exact remaining gap:** there is no live, unrepaired source-backed conditional bound in the three\nroutes' current citation set for the checklist to retire. Building a reusable gate would only\nre-confirm the accepted repairs. The only way the checklist regains independent value is if a *new*\nestimate enters the routes (e.g. one citing Blomer 2607.24311 or a future Harper/prefix bound); the\ngate can then be applied to that new row without re-opening route 219. That is a reopening\ncondition, not a next step, and is recorded in `report_dp.md` §3.\n\n**Access gap:** Pascadi 2511.08445 and Harper 1208.5992/2412.19644 were not fetched in full; their\ntheorem statements are taken from the served #1973/#1983 citations, as a first look permits."},"research_route_id":219,"verification_plan":null,"verification_fingerprint":null,"review_admitted_at":null,"department_id":"dept_0e793a31e299699dfaaa6fee","run_id":"run_c53e478c04002d1d9aea3b7d","triage_lead":null,"revision_base_sha":null,"integration":null,"resolves":null,"handle":"Benjaminsen","job_brief":"Search online for existing attempts, results, tables and datasets before testing feasibility. Reuse the recorded search and inspect the closest sources and weakest assumption. Use published numbers with citations; do not reproduce them in a first look. Seek the smallest experiment on the uncovered step. Recommend promising only with specific evidence and a bounded next step; do not claim the route is proved. Map the assumptions of any borrowed method onto this problem.\n\nRead GET <project base>/research-routes/219 and return #2494. Return the ordinary report and transcript plus research: {route_id: 219, outcome: \"promising|progress|blocked|inconclusive|known|result\", evidence_md: \"what the evidence changes, <=4000 chars\", prior_art_md: \"updated online search record, sources and exact remaining gap, <=4000\", next_step: {question, method, success, failure, budget_hours} <only for continued pursuit; what to do, never when or how fast; it must not ask for what a return on this route or a linked route already did, and the route returns it builds on go in depends_on or cites.returns>, obstacle: {kind, statement, assumptions, evidence, revisit_when} <for blocked/inconclusive>, depends_on: [<return ids actually required>]}. A result with a distinct next_step requests review and continues pursuit concurrently; omit next_step when no further experiment is warranted. Use known with prior_art_md and no next_step or obstacle when cited prior work already covers the proposed contribution; it stops automatic investigation without requesting review. The evidence grade is separate. Do not close a broad route because one proof attempt failed.","review_deferred":false,"in_triage":false,"triage":[],"lean_statement_binding":null,"verification_runs":[],"verification_state":null,"verification_summary":null,"canonical_return":null,"review_history":[],"dependencies":[{"id":"1973","status":"accepted","final_rung":"proven","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"1983","status":"accepted","final_rung":"proven","canonical_return_id":null}],"cited_by":[],"route_dependents":[219],"research_url":"/projects/twin-primes/research-routes/219","transcript_url":"/projects/twin-primes/return/2511/transcript","files":[{"sha256":"28ce56f7c9d45a579be165c1c9211eb438a47bfe616b5532d001bc3bd47f2742","name":"report_dp.md","bytes":7132},{"sha256":"60927f9402b4cf0889547015985aabd8c776bd3b2a20b5e7a7bbb14772bcd1e8","name":"evidence_dp.md","bytes":3816},{"sha256":"095031c2b4decb9774c6622b54c681c3054ba6c2720c7ae0fdfaa554fce3774f","name":"prior_art_dp.md","bytes":3533},{"sha256":"a4e2ca3a061e28d230078fbd307b64764897f30a42a87ad6857c1cc3ff303cdc","name":"fetch_dp.py","bytes":1443},{"sha256":"71503e0968557a6874e11bbce4c196d1db736a83194ee49bb3ea921f70ee0939","name":"check_dp.py","bytes":6159},{"sha256":"ae7678abc7cc826db0e79ced2b4dd28777c84ae60fe9f0c66f56dae4da428aac","name":"check_dp.out","bytes":1425},{"sha256":"06a0118ff9612413116db5ddc390b959874c0e4d5c2187e52a281e71d34a4ce6","name":"check_dp.control.out","bytes":1489},{"sha256":"0914cab82ac24e9f9a219154c468ed868534f22b1fa6086b36e5df9b0a3ea690","name":"redact_dp.py","bytes":3972},{"sha256":"d2dddca3c39782da2ce2603c04aa44288006e82ee59e1cb581496488bbea7998","name":"recipe_dp.md","bytes":1645},{"sha256":"21a1d3556191bf54458b13fa0ebe41b4550fb92a33ab9bee6518d82ef222c843","name":"sah.py","bytes":56280},{"sha256":"d870aa2ae68e5177cb563e9fa7bfb60cec21029e3d98c3e39b8bbb57f1abf22a","name":"route219.json","bytes":22535},{"sha256":"1c923d9e9d64e8ec204c37dd91eac13bb6d52a5dc52254e6700d3dab9a30f27d","name":"route182.json","bytes":23293},{"sha256":"722245b0dc145197bf46ef66c39c55c899d824133c749a50e8e69502b9b4f45a","name":"route185.json","bytes":100587},{"sha256":"2cb99b2e7ec9842689ccf28f870bf62cb15e7a792fbe6fd42258b02f3018458a","name":"route204.json","bytes":44590},{"sha256":"d48ae7fafea3ecd81e487fa3749b5b2e857a2fef6ba24e8a8375b7d21e15c269","name":"return1973.json","bytes":31648},{"sha256":"f271d27a04c55b4441b801e1dcb96af3a4421fbd77e8b1b5bb5521fed7be08d6","name":"return1983.json","bytes":35847},{"sha256":"f36917ee95ac9c9ef51f5a5c04d74b93c39619b798469c589252de79a7437e68","name":"return2013.json","bytes":27739},{"sha256":"b7b8d437c51d1bb81a18cb495f44f12ae6426a0b53180e7a87b22347489a5b52","name":"return2074.json","bytes":37434},{"sha256":"b2e2b1c26932656144dab007ec4db109d9762013672e350fb084bb636b3d03c9","name":"return2008.json","bytes":13491},{"sha256":"52e3b6913126f4d9c928daa2f756273bb803f866c77832a76b39c103795b97bc","name":"return2011.json","bytes":17038},{"sha256":"4e03db99ef5092fdd89f8dc577c8507675db9c71740f3e30a7c6cb4148072f6f","name":"return2014.json","bytes":12478},{"sha256":"05621f2572f162c362b987276666b8d787d25ccda64518ab2e303d34c1171450","name":"return1976.json","bytes":17989},{"sha256":"c7d8673522e9d64b537ca452672ca1af66b18677d7f228577d4572fdf66d9518","name":"return2215.json","bytes":31053},{"sha256":"1462c9712261bb089803179c872797c34b0ab44e682c7868161632a240a762c3","name":"return2494.json","bytes":26778},{"sha256":"7d0cc7529d51f11e2b556b30143d8c24c7ae85984e8c5769fdad363122570513","name":"return2257.json","bytes":17048},{"sha256":"f70ad7b1b812280b3500359d6e4d0f7ba646127e3f4ce99e1c7594e71e171e75","name":"return2297.json","bytes":26968},{"sha256":"ff8fff993f49faf73f016b011ae068bd3b56f74e371c84721c62f450f586dffb","name":"return2440.json","bytes":30921},{"sha256":"f86b5d0d7935a9b532bb9f6514eff7b9f77d865a87de99924e2f35c3701b6187","name":"return2447.json","bytes":42150}],"decided_by_author_handle":false,"reviews":[],"decisions":[],"decision":null,"duplicates":[],"cited_messages":[]}