{"id":2542,"job_id":5330,"problem_id":1,"lane_id":4,"type":"explore","user_id":1,"model":"deepseek-v4-flash","provider":"deepseek","report_md":"# Job #5330 (route 31, first look / step check) — the held matched-normaliser step is still open; the three linked returns consume #2459's confound without executing it\n\nJob #5330, route 31, stage `first_look`, general mode. **Read-only served fetches. cpu_hours 0.**\nNo field built, no permutation drawn, no published number recomputed.\n\n## Summary\n\nRoute 31 is `active`, revision 21, `last_return_id` **2459**, and its served `next_step` is #2459's\nown step (canonical equality). The step (quoted verbatim as this return's `next_step`):\n\n> Adopt the matched-normaliser device of this return as the route's control … and run it over the\n> route's whole anchored set: x=2^16 beta U=10, x=2^17 alpha U=14, x=2^20 alpha U=14, at seeds\n> 4164/4165/4166, for the streams N4u and thinning, reporting per cell-case z_level and the 200-draw\n> leave-one-out pseudo-observed range, with the anchoring gate against #2348's published served\n> readings first.\n\nReturns recorded **after** #2459 that cite it on linked routes: **#2490** (route 184, progress),\n**#2496** (route 220, proposed), **#2523** (route 220, promising). #2459's `cited_by` is exactly\n`[2490, 2496, 2523]`; route 31's own event list ends at #2459, so **no route-31 return follows the\nsetter**. The other linked-route mentions in the brief (#2474, #2523, #2496, #2490 from the issue)\nare the same three.\n\n**None of the three runs the matched-normaliser device over route 31's anchored set.** Each\n*consumes* the confound #2459 measured and sets or keeps **its own** route's step. The step is\ntherefore still open: outcome **`promising`**, with the step copied exactly as `next_step`.\n\n## What each return settles (and does not)\n\n- **#2490 (route 184, progress, recorded).** A step check for route 184's held step (set by #2348).\n  It replaces route 184's step with a *semantics-pinned, clause-split* version: preserve the per-cell\n  occupancy histogram and the exact `mean_sq` while destroying only the within-class divisibility\n  placement, seed-stable across 4164/4165/4166, reading \"#2459's matched-normaliser reading of the\n  same runs alongside for cross-checking\". It explicitly **declines to duplicate the decisive test\n  queued on route 31**. It settles route 184's step; it does not run route 31's nine cell-cases.\n- **#2496 (route 220, proposed, recorded).** A read-and-connect discovery proposal; **no\n  computation**. It states the shared-estimator/shared-cloud connection and maps the streams: route\n  31's queued run serves both routes. It names route 31's queued step as the resolver, i.e. it\n  *relies on* the step rather than answering it. Its own `next_step` is route 220's.\n- **#2523 (route 220, promising, recorded).** A route-220 first look. It argues route 220's proposed\n  step **duplicates** route 31's registered step (a queued device), and proposes a distinct small\n  measurement on route 220: whether `N4u`'s residual `mean_sq` is preserved (the transfer route 220\n  assumes). It confirms route 31's step is *queued*, not executed, and does not run it.\n\n## Why the step is still open\n\nThe step's decisive content is the unbought computation it names: the matched-normaliser reading at\nthe **full anchored set** (three cases) over **both** streams at **three seeds**, with the anchoring\ngate first. #2459 itself (the setter) reports only a **post-hoc third case at seed 4164** on the\nplacement-destroying thinning substitute; it does not report N4u at all (route 220's own\n`uncertainty_md` says N4u's `mean_sq` was never measured). No return on record — on route 31 or on\nthe linked routes 184/220 — reports the nine cell-cases. An unchanged-step comparison on another\nroute, as the assignment notes, is not new evidence.\n\nTwo further points make the step *still worth the pursuit* rather than answered:\n\n1. #2523 sharpens the open object: the transfer of the confound to the **N4u** stream is a live,\n   checkable question, and route 31's step already includes N4u (\"for the streams N4u and thinning\").\n   So route 31's step is where that question is decided.\n2. #2490's replacement step is complementary, not duplicative: it tests a *different* null family\n   (occupancy-histogram-preserving) with a seed-stability clause, and it points at route 31's run as\n   the cross-check. The two together are the intended reading; neither substitutes for the other.\n\n## Scope and disclosures\n\nRecord comparison only; no experiment, no sieve, no published number recomputed; `cpu_hours 0`; no\nasymptotic, exponent or `E_>(x)` claim; nothing about `G2`, `β₂` or twin-prime infinitude. The step is\ncopied byte-for-byte from the served route record (`route_31.json.next_step`). 48 of @Benjaminsen's\nreturns still await a verdict; nothing for the person to do.\n","patch":null,"cpu_hours":0,"hashes":{"sah.py":"21a1d3556191bf54458b13fa0ebe41b4550fb92a33ab9bee6518d82ef222c843","check_eo.py":"61c1e121a9603bca5ea0c4c843fb161bbaa074cc9b012e292a8b5c85d3fb7151","fetch_eo.py":"d217a50205d2db729c7f4d2e699aea983ae0da8d273ef2c8246098583798e610","check_eo.out":"95e5fba25b909aa7790e08bd0547ce375277ca0108496e2c67710d83da8005f9","recipe_eo.md":"9d3074196aa8ee39355450b7f730543671b10a4bb645c7849e060a7ef13767c8","redact_eo.py":"ebb2e54272e994397227f81414e05d7ab8b32e581788d308e4723422f9cfa9c9","report_eo.md":"08d81774f2b144c259b4363c9893dde88da0006101ae499d61325a4b80e470cb","inspect_eo.py":"e9295220c9642a34ae9a12ede906333f008452c9a29a7999156f9e5371017583","evidence_eo.md":"931d308abd8d3f03efd1d29d1c87716601676aab61f80b8588348ab023ee1eb2","next_step.json":"9ca8c12278810cca5de274c4da38c5254e30ce8a9765e134c19a361b349ddf0a","prior_art_eo.md":"cf8a284f2280f4adf188cb22e8efb80f8b969ca767ce29133f13706c8bb1b8a8","check_eo.control.out":"ab94d42e7ec49475d6ac10ddd7441eab3138e5d81462cff6c133bc5d5e4a2aa4","served-route-31.json":"a959c7a7191c84aa7abf1562ccef2d527891f727d7aa38381c5744b093baaec5","served-route-184.json":"6980bcec65ebb1cb41aedeef6f9046ca9cf34b42d636de950f973f0cff067b43","served-return-2021.json":"6b8d912a6ceee4f1edb664a48e7e358fb3008515767841a7b25e97e373cc6da3","served-return-2265.json":"c5044f68e6076a59878500616905c8162fabacafc2339474a35019b274efb1e7","served-return-2267.json":"b912f483b25d11f5f8f84059a577b42dc3f99b16a92e98503c5888604c794e3d","served-return-2272.json":"0eef47d3bcd79ce5e5a7f5af045c3e7414770940404d514447ac429b45d690fd","served-return-2348.json":"0bb7a45736b142ca6e2f31d6e369d934375a1c32175331bac48597a5848e6262","served-return-2374.json":"906a52c11657d6493c63db49d80626d1b0779044983aa3e5da13ed84d5199f20","served-return-2459.json":"39c508e99d575720f3c7cfefd1d55e2245c1b9c90774f205f8c8f74703109924","served-return-2490.json":"f793ea4432f9e593ae4d60959a337b8bb4ee01628179fc84622fba4be9df3f5a","served-return-2496.json":"eb7201bd6f5222d6ff12dcdbd3bf8270cd1af6dcb23c1a41bb573325fc7e08ab","served-return-2523.json":"af4a93adaf47cc7cff0bf1395c4c01165725be91de89fe678eee02fab364f53a","served-research-protocol.json":"1c186df58b09d50862679c52a5ef87e8b2b265ac78535d42ca245b102c5f0c8c"},"author_rung":"heuristic","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","created_at":"2026-10-08T08:50:44.094Z","repo_url":null,"commit":null,"cites":{"files":[],"handles":[],"returns":[2348,2459,2490,2496,2523],"messages":[]},"tokens":{"log":"custom","input":0,"models":{"deepseek-v4-flash":0},"output":0,"source":"none","entries":0,"cache_read":0,"cache_write":0,"observed_models":["deepseek-v4-flash"]},"paper_slug":null,"revision_path":null,"revision_sha":null,"recipe_md":"# Recipe / handoff — job #5330 (route 31 first_look step check)\n\n## What this return decides\nRoute 31's held step (#2459's matched-normaliser device, route rev 21) is **still open**; the three\nlinked returns that cite #2459 (#2490, #2496, #2523) consume its confound and set their own routes'\nsteps but do **not** execute it. Outcome `promising`; the step is copied exactly as `next_step`, so the\nheld pursuit goes out on route 31.\n\n## How a successor executes the queued step (a pursuit on route 31)\n1. Fetch the served pipeline + records: route 31 `next_step` and returns #2459, #2348, #2374, #2265,\n   #2267, #2272; the served estimator files (#2348's `newstat_p.py`/`n4_run.py`/`harness.py`,\n   `sieve-null.py`, `job1438-cls-resid-offset.py`) via `GET /files/<sha>` (byte-check `.py`, parsed-\n   equal `.json`).\n2. Reproduce #2348's **anchoring gate first**: the published seed-4164 `|z_level|` at the three cases\n   (`x=2^16 beta`, `x=2^17 alpha`, `x=2^20 alpha`) must match before any new number is read.\n3. Run the served estimator unchanged with the matched normaliser: evaluate each draw's residual grid\n   with a **common** `mean_sq` = the observed value (`grid_of(stat, f, mean_sq)` already takes\n   `mean_sq` as an argument). Report per cell-case `z_level` and the **200-draw leave-one-out\n   pseudo-observed range**, for streams **N4u and thinning**, at seeds **4164/4165/4166**.\n4. Read the step's clauses: success = anchoring gate passes and the nine cell-cases are seed-stable\n   (all outside the pseudo-observed range, or all inside); failure = mixed or seed-flipping.\n5. Do **not** re-run the served thinning reading, re-derive the anchors, rebuild N4/N3, or restate\n   #2374's record comparison.\n\n## Cross-route context to keep in view\n- #2490 (route 184) runs a **complementary** control (occupancy-histogram + exact `mean_sq`\n  preserved, only within-class divisibility placement destroyed) and asks to read route 31's matched\n  reading alongside it. The two are not duplicates.\n- #2523 (route 220) leaves a distinct open measurement: whether **N4u's own** residual `mean_sq` is\n  preserved. Route 31's step already includes the N4u stream, so that question is decided here too.\n\n## Cheapest verifiable computations already ruled out\nNothing in this assignment recomputed a served number; a successor should similarly avoid re-running\nanchors. `cpu_hours` for this step check was 0; the step's own compute hint is\n`{ram_gb:4, disk_gb:1, cpu_hours:0.4}`.","verification":null,"target":null,"finding":null,"human_md":null,"provisional":false,"effects_applied_at":null,"effort":null,"also_fix":null,"transcript_omitted":{"share":0,"omitted":0,"outputs":0},"patch_hash":null,"superseded_by":null,"duplicate_of":null,"transcript_resubmitted_at":null,"file_notes":null,"research":{"outcome":"promising","route_id":31,"next_step":{"method":"Adopt the matched-normaliser device of this return as the route's control (the served estimator is unchanged: each draw's residual grid is evaluated with a common mean_sq, the observed value) and run it over the route's whole anchored set: x=2^16 beta U=10, x=2^17 alpha U=14, x=2^20 alpha U=14, at seeds 4164/4165/4166, for the streams N4u and thinning, reporting per cell-case z_level and the 200-draw leave-one-out pseudo-observed range, with the anchoring gate against #2348's published served readings first. Separately, and only if a control is still wanted, split #2348's registered clauses before building anything: they name different objects and #2348's own fidelity file already measures N4u's same-residue rate above the chance level its gate demands. Do NOT re-run the served thinning reading, re-derive the anchors, rebuild N4/N3, or restate #2374's record comparison.","compute":{"ram_gb":4,"disk_gb":1,"cpu_hours":0.4},"failure":"The verdict stays mixed across the three cases or flips with the seed: then the matched-normaliser device has no scale-stable reading either, which locates the obstruction as a power problem at 200 draws rather than a placement or normaliser question, and the route's next ingredient is the draw count or a different statistic, not another control.","success":"The anchoring gate passes and the nine cell-cases give a seed-stable verdict: all outside the pseudo-observed range, or all inside. All outside re-aims route 31's amplitude clause to the level functional rather than to placement; all inside closes the arithmetic reading of the level shift within this control family.","question":"Does the level displacement route 31's amplitude clause needs survive the destruction of within-class divisibility placement when the residual normaliser mean_sq, an argument of stat.rl, is held fixed -- and does the answer keep its sign across scales and seeds?","budget_hours":2,"required_tools":[],"required_sources":["served_return_records","served_pipeline_files"]},"depends_on":[2348,2459,2490,2496,2523],"evidence_md":"Step check for route 31's held step (set by #2459, 2026-10-07): the returns recorded after it on the\nlinked routes consume its measured confound and set their own steps, but none executes the device over\nroute 31's anchored set, so the step is still open (outcome promising, step copied exactly).\n\nTHE HELD STEP. GET /research-routes/31: state active, revision 21, last_return_id 2459, next_step\ncanonical sha256 71bba79c…, byte-equal to #2459's research.next_step. It asks for the matched-normaliser\ndevice (each draw's residual grid evaluated with a common mean_sq = the observed value, which stat.rl\ntakes as an argument) over the whole anchored set x=2^16 beta U=10, x=2^17 alpha U=14, x=2^20 alpha\nU=14, seeds 4164/4165/4166, streams N4u AND thinning, per cell-case z_level plus the 200-draw\nleave-one-out pseudo-observed range, anchoring gate against #2348's published readings first.\n\nWHAT IS ON RECORD AFTER IT. #2459.cited_by == [2490, 2496, 2523]; route 31's event list ends at 2459\n(set {636,638,646,648,654,664,666,667,668,672,1001,1002,1423,1821,2002,2021,2251,2265,2374,2459}), so\nno route-31 return follows the setter. Each linked return:\n- #2490 (route 184, progress, recorded): replaces route 184's step (#2348's occupancy-preserving\n  matched control, shown void) with a semantics-pinned, clause-split version — per-cell occupancy\n  histogram and exact mean_sq held, only within-class divisibility placement destroyed, seed-stable at\n  4164/4165/4166, to be read alongside \"#2459's matched-normaliser reading of the same runs\". It\n  explicitly declines to duplicate the decisive test queued on route 31. It settles route 184's step;\n  it runs no route-31 cell-case.\n- #2496 (route 220, proposed, recorded): a read-and-connect discovery proposal, no computation. It\n  states the shared-estimator/shared-cloud connection and maps the streams (route 31's queued run\n  serves both routes). Its own next_step is route 220's; it relies on route 31's step, does not answer\n  it.\n- #2523 (route 220, promising, recorded): route-220 first look. It argues route 220's proposed step\n  duplicates route 31's registered step, and proposes a distinct small measurement (whether N4u's own\n  residual mean_sq is preserved — route 220's uncertainty_md admits N4u's mean_sq was never measured).\n  It confirms route 31's step is queued, not executed.\n\nWHY STILL OPEN. The step is answered only by reporting the matched-normaliser reading over the full\nanchored set (three cases) for both streams at three seeds with the anchoring gate first. #2459 (the\nsetter) reports only a post-hoc third case at seed 4164 on the thinning substitute and no N4u reading;\n#2348's fidelity file has no mean_sq column; no fetched return reports the nine cell-cases. An\nunchanged-step comparison on another route is not new evidence. The step remains the unique home of\nits question and #2523 and #2490 both point their own routes at it.\n\nSCOPE. Record comparison only; no experiment, no sieve, no published number recomputed; cpu_hours 0;\nno asymptotic/exponent/E_>(x) claim; nothing about G2, beta_2 or twin-prime infinitude.","prior_art_md":"# Prior art / prior record — job #5330 (route 31 first_look step check)\n\nThis is a **record-comparison step check**, not a novelty claim or an experiment, so the prior art is\nthe served corpus itself; no external literature search was run (and none is needed to decide whether a\nqueued internal step is already answered).\n\n## The route's own record (the step's provenance)\n\nRoute 31, origin #636, revision 21. The registered device the step asks for is #2459's\nmatched-normaliser substitution. Its immediate ancestry:\n- #2348 (route 184, progress) set the occupancy-preserving matched control and published the anchoring\n  readings (fidelity file: N4u same-residue 0.8528/0.9261 vs chance 0.00641/0.46959; thinning at\n  chance). It has **no mean_sq column**.\n- #2459 (route 31, progress) established the registered control is not constructible as written (its\n  two clauses name different objects) and measured the normaliser confound on the thinning substitute\n  (observed residual mean_sq 11.42/17.31/24.90 vs thinning ranges ~[979, 10816]/[1379, 12025]/\n  [2234, 23984]; rel-sd 202–299), then set this step. It reports a post-hoc third case only.\n- #2374 (route 31, step check) established the consume-not-duplicate principle for this control.\n- #2265/#2267/#2272 (route 31/184) executed the earlier held step and defined/ran the level statistic.\n\n## The linked-route returns recorded after the setter\n\n#2490 (route 184), #2496 (route 220), #2523 (route 220) — all cite #2459. None claims novelty for the\nmatched-normaliser device; each treats it as route 31's queued work. #2496 is a discovery connection\n(no external prior art claimed); #2523 argues route 220's step duplicates route 31's and proposes a\ndistinct N4u-mean_sq measurement; #2490 replaces route 184's step with a complementary\noccupancy-preserving control and points at route 31's run for the cross-check.\n\n## Nearest external family\n\nClassical restricted randomization / matched permutation controls are the relevant external family\n(the route's own #2459 prior-art note), but no external template states the specific incompatibility\n(this is route-internal methodology). No external novelty claim is made by this return."},"research_route_id":31,"verification_plan":null,"verification_fingerprint":null,"review_admitted_at":null,"department_id":"dept_0e793a31e299699dfaaa6fee","run_id":"run_5f48619c8568cd09f28c3c7b","triage_lead":null,"revision_base_sha":null,"integration":null,"resolves":null,"handle":"Benjaminsen","job_brief":"Step check before pursuit. Route #31's next experiment was set by return #2459, and returns were recorded after it on this route or a route linked to it by citations, dependencies or shared premises. Before a pursuit is spent on it, decide whether the returns already on record answer it. Read and compare; do not run the experiment and do not reproduce a computation a return already made. An unchanged-step comparison on another route is not new evidence.\n\nThe step:\n{\"method\":\"Adopt the matched-normaliser device of this return as the route's control (the served estimator is unchanged: each draw's residual grid is evaluated with a common mean_sq, the observed value) and run it over the route's whole anchored set: x=2^16 beta U=10, x=2^17 alpha U=14, x=2^20 alpha U=14, at seeds 4164/4165/4166, for the streams N4u and thinning, reporting per cell-case z_level and the 200-draw leave-one-out pseudo-observed range, with the anchoring gate against #2348's published served readings first. Separately, and only if a control is still wanted, split #2348's registered clauses before building anything: they name different objects and #2348's own fidelity file already measures N4u's same-residue rate above the chance level its gate demands. Do NOT re-run the served thinning reading, re-derive the anchors, rebuild N4/N3, or restate #2374's record comparison.\",\"compute\":{\"ram_gb\":4,\"disk_gb\":1,\"cpu_hours\":0.4},\"failure\":\"The verdict stays mixed across the three cases or flips with the seed: then the matched-normaliser device has no scale-stable reading either, which locates the obstruction as a power problem at 200 draws rather than a placement or normaliser question, and the route's next ingredient is the draw count or a different statistic, not another control.\",\"success\":\"The anchoring gate passes and the nine cell-cases give a seed-stable verdict: all outside the pseudo-observed range, or all inside. All outside re-aims route 31's amplitude clause to the level functional rather than to placement; all inside closes the arithmetic reading of the level shift within this control family.\",\"question\":\"Does the level displacement route 31's amplitude clause needs survive the destruction of within-class divisibility placement when the residual normaliser mean_sq, an argument of stat.rl, is held fixed -- and does the answer keep its sign across scales and seeds?\",\"budget_hours\":2,\"required_tools\":[],\"required_sources\":[\"served_return_records\",\"served_pipeline_files\"]}\n\nThe route's own returns: #636, #638, #646, #648, #654, #664, #666, #667, #668, #672, #1001, #1002, #1423, #1821, #2002, #2021, #2251, #2265, #2374, #2459 (GET <project base>/return/<id>).\n\nReturns to compare it with (the latest on this route first, then linked routes):\n- Return #2523 (route 220, promising, recorded, recorded): Route 220 asks to treat the normaliser confound #2459 measured on route 31's thinning control as a cross-route prerequisite, removed by one matched-normaliser run and applied to any future permutation-cloud route. The served record decides two things. (1) THE OPERATIONAL CONTENT IS ALREADY QUEUED. Route 31's registered next_step (#2459, 2026-10-07) already runs the matched-normaliser device \"for \n- Return #2496 (route 220, proposed, recorded, recorded): The permutation-cloud methodology that routes 31 and 184 use for their null comparisons has a structural normaliser-matching weakness. #2459 (route 31, pursue, deepseek-v4-flash) measured the confound; return 2490 (route 184 step check, this session) consumed it and proposed the semantics-pinned replacement step. This return adds the cross-route connection. THE MEASURED CONFOUND. #2459 (route 31,\n- Return #2490 (route 184, progress, recorded, recorded): Step check for route 184's held step (set by #2348, 2026-10-05): the step is void as written on two recorded grounds, and the question it carries is already scheduled for a decisive test on the linked route. Outcome progress: the old step is replaced by one that pins the missing semantics first and does not duplicate the queued run. What each return settles. #2267 (proposed) defined the orthogona\n\nReturn the ordinary report and transcript plus research: {route_id: 31, outcome, evidence_md, depends_on}, with one of:\n- outcome \"known\": the returns you name in depends_on already answer the step; evidence_md says what each settles. No next_step. The route stops here and the pursuit is not handed out.\n- outcome \"progress\" with a new next_step that builds on the answer where they answer part of it; the old step is replaced.\n- outcome \"promising\" with the step above copied exactly as next_step when it is still open; the held pursuit then goes out with your note, and these returns never hold it again.","review_deferred":false,"in_triage":false,"triage":[],"lean_statement_binding":null,"verification_runs":[],"verification_state":null,"verification_summary":null,"canonical_return":null,"review_history":[],"dependencies":[{"id":"2348","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"2459","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"2490","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"2496","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"2523","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null}],"cited_by":[],"route_dependents":[],"research_url":"/projects/twin-primes/research-routes/31","transcript_url":"/projects/twin-primes/return/2542/transcript","files":[{"sha256":"08d81774f2b144c259b4363c9893dde88da0006101ae499d61325a4b80e470cb","name":"report_eo.md","bytes":4742},{"sha256":"931d308abd8d3f03efd1d29d1c87716601676aab61f80b8588348ab023ee1eb2","name":"evidence_eo.md","bytes":3114},{"sha256":"cf8a284f2280f4adf188cb22e8efb80f8b969ca767ce29133f13706c8bb1b8a8","name":"prior_art_eo.md","bytes":2198},{"sha256":"9d3074196aa8ee39355450b7f730543671b10a4bb645c7849e060a7ef13767c8","name":"recipe_eo.md","bytes":2477},{"sha256":"9ca8c12278810cca5de274c4da38c5254e30ce8a9765e134c19a361b349ddf0a","name":"next_step.json","bytes":2066},{"sha256":"61c1e121a9603bca5ea0c4c843fb161bbaa074cc9b012e292a8b5c85d3fb7151","name":"check_eo.py","bytes":6616},{"sha256":"95e5fba25b909aa7790e08bd0547ce375277ca0108496e2c67710d83da8005f9","name":"check_eo.out","bytes":2602},{"sha256":"ab94d42e7ec49475d6ac10ddd7441eab3138e5d81462cff6c133bc5d5e4a2aa4","name":"check_eo.control.out","bytes":2892},{"sha256":"d217a50205d2db729c7f4d2e699aea983ae0da8d273ef2c8246098583798e610","name":"fetch_eo.py","bytes":1949},{"sha256":"e9295220c9642a34ae9a12ede906333f008452c9a29a7999156f9e5371017583","name":"inspect_eo.py","bytes":2148},{"sha256":"ebb2e54272e994397227f81414e05d7ab8b32e581788d308e4723422f9cfa9c9","name":"redact_ek.py","bytes":3673},{"sha256":"21a1d3556191bf54458b13fa0ebe41b4550fb92a33ab9bee6518d82ef222c843","name":"sah.py","bytes":56280},{"sha256":"a959c7a7191c84aa7abf1562ccef2d527891f727d7aa38381c5744b093baaec5","name":"served-route-31.json","bytes":247181},{"sha256":"6980bcec65ebb1cb41aedeef6f9046ca9cf34b42d636de950f973f0cff067b43","name":"route184.json","bytes":61262},{"sha256":"39c508e99d575720f3c7cfefd1d55e2245c1b9c90774f205f8c8f74703109924","name":"served-return-2459.json","bytes":30140},{"sha256":"906a52c11657d6493c63db49d80626d1b0779044983aa3e5da13ed84d5199f20","name":"served-return-2374.json","bytes":23425},{"sha256":"0bb7a45736b142ca6e2f31d6e369d934375a1c32175331bac48597a5848e6262","name":"served-return-2348.json","bytes":40164},{"sha256":"c5044f68e6076a59878500616905c8162fabacafc2339474a35019b274efb1e7","name":"served-return-2265.json","bytes":24584},{"sha256":"b912f483b25d11f5f8f84059a577b42dc3f99b16a92e98503c5888604c794e3d","name":"served-return-2267.json","bytes":24356},{"sha256":"0eef47d3bcd79ce5e5a7f5af045c3e7414770940404d514447ac429b45d690fd","name":"served-return-2272.json","bytes":19098},{"sha256":"6b8d912a6ceee4f1edb664a48e7e358fb3008515767841a7b25e97e373cc6da3","name":"served-return-2021.json","bytes":41935},{"sha256":"af4a93adaf47cc7cff0bf1395c4c01165725be91de89fe678eee02fab364f53a","name":"served-return-2523.json","bytes":28012},{"sha256":"eb7201bd6f5222d6ff12dcdbd3bf8270cd1af6dcb23c1a41bb573325fc7e08ab","name":"served-return-2496.json","bytes":16167},{"sha256":"f793ea4432f9e593ae4d60959a337b8bb4ee01628179fc84622fba4be9df3f5a","name":"served-return-2490.json","bytes":23567},{"sha256":"1c186df58b09d50862679c52a5ef87e8b2b265ac78535d42ca245b102c5f0c8c","name":"research-protocol.json","bytes":52062}],"decided_by_author_handle":false,"reviews":[],"decisions":[],"decision":null,"duplicates":[],"cited_messages":[]}