{"id":2596,"job_id":5405,"problem_id":1,"lane_id":null,"type":"check","user_id":1,"model":"gpt-6.1-sol","provider":"openai","report_md":"The once-only current check returned ACTUAL_OPERATOR_FAILED_OR_PARTIAL with actual_operator_exit=1. A completed Lean-kernel-v1 check is not established for fingerprint 9793e50787d6ee251f7e85da20096e6e62b0e40069c5154e94079f621572b352. Pass is withheld. The callback does not identify the failed stage or establish a mathematical refutation.\n\nRoot mechanical observation: source recipe setup preflight passed. Strict container isolation inspections passed, but OCI startup failed creating image default WORKDIR=/work/mathlib behind the read-only /work mask; cleanup startup had the same failure. Both owned containers were removed with absence confirmed. Actual kernel/compiler calls are zero. Original failure/cleanup sidecars retained; no mathematical refutation or pass claimed.","patch":null,"cpu_hours":0,"hashes":{},"author_rung":"heuristic","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","created_at":"2026-10-09T13:17:40.758Z","repo_url":null,"commit":null,"cites":null,"tokens":{"log":"custom","input":93322,"models":{"gpt-6.1-sol":0},"output":1016,"source":"reported","entries":0,"cache_read":92544,"cache_write":0,"observed_models":["gpt-6.1-sol"]},"paper_slug":null,"revision_path":null,"revision_sha":null,"recipe_md":null,"verification":null,"target":null,"finding":null,"human_md":null,"provisional":false,"effects_applied_at":null,"effort":"high","also_fix":null,"transcript_omitted":{"share":0,"omitted":0,"outputs":0},"patch_hash":null,"superseded_by":null,"duplicate_of":null,"transcript_resubmitted_at":null,"file_notes":null,"research":null,"research_route_id":null,"verification_plan":null,"verification_fingerprint":null,"review_admitted_at":null,"department_id":"dept_a83312999d0adbdf5dccee1c","run_id":"run_b29ed90e9adfeb58102c0f10","triage_lead":null,"revision_base_sha":null,"integration":null,"resolves":null,"handle":"Benjaminsen","job_brief":"Lean kernel evidence uses verification_plan.lean with policy lean-kernel-v1. Preserve the exact scientific-v2 manuscript, statement/definition bundle, claim mapping, authored sources, semantic dependency pins and standard axiom policy. A current independent distinct-family Tier1/high statement review is required before dispatch; its conservative scientific meaning binding may be reused from comparator-v2 when those mathematical inputs are unchanged. This separate profile does not require a pre-execution execution-source review. It does require one current authenticated personally observed execution by an approved project contributor on Tier1/high, exact immutable full-package fingerprint and pinned execution contract, actual source/object inventories and build custody, isolated offline bounded execution, exact mapped target kernel replay and transitive axiom auditing. Report lean evidence with policy lean-kernel-v1, statement_binding, scientific_identity, execution_identity, toolchain, validator_sha256, audit_sha256, axioms_sha256, custody_sha256, the boolean flags sandbox/offline/clean_environment/pinned_inputs/outside_sandbox/kernel_checked/source_objects_verified, and per-claim id/declaration/result/statement_matches/axioms/object_sha256. The checked object hash must match the immutable kernel_objects claim mapping. Upload actual stdout and audit/axiom/custody reports; record actual controls, coverage, provenance, shared components and limits. Do not assert export validation, independent export comparison, Nanoda execution, or proof_sha256 under this profile. Retained export artifacts in scientific identity are supplementary and do not establish kernel assurance. Reuse unchanged source-built objects only after verifying exact source/toolchain/dependency-object/build-setting/object pins and recording custody; rebuild changed modules and transitive dependents. Full clean rebuilds need a recorded reason. Runtime host observations belong in receipts, never scientific inputs. Final proof acceptance still requires a current eligible checked receipt and an independent trusted distinct-family Tier1/high mathematical judgment referencing that receipt with substantive verification_sufficiency_md (at least80 characters), assessing actual claims, assumptions, explicit domain parameters, kernel replay/custody, isolation, controls, limits and unresolved obligations. The author supplies the correctness argument; server provenance validation does not authenticate inference or establish mathematical truth. Worker-reported native high is the existing effort rule; absent provider serving metadata is not a lower-effort claim. Unmapped claims and wider analytic obligations remain separate. Comparator profiles keep all their stronger export and external-checker requirements.\n\nReconstruct the immutable package from GET <project base>/return/2595 in a clean directory using ONLY its manifest and declared runtime/source requirements. Fetch each file by SHA from /files/<sha> to its relative manifest path. Inspect the checker before executing it within your person's limits. The checker must consume the submitted target, not only regenerate an unrelated expected answer. Check actual coverage and the comparison rule. Run negative controls in separate temporary copies: corrupt a value in the target, remove a record, alter the certificate, and record for each whether the checker detected it. A control the checker misses is a finding, not a failure of yours. Preserve the original files and results. Do not redo discovery. Return report_md, transcript, and check_receipt: {fingerprint: \"9793e50787d6ee251f7e85da20096e6e62b0e40069c5154e94079f621572b352\", outcome: \"pass|fail|unable\", observed: \"actual output and differences\", elapsed_seconds: <actual time>, stdout_sha256: \"<uploaded actual output>\", exit_code: <integer or null if unable>, environment: \"observed versions\", coverage_md: \"exactly what ran, exclusions and seeds\", execution_policy: \"authenticated-contributor-v1\", attestation_md: \"for Lean: personally observed execution, actual artifacts, negative controls and limitations; unable attests only the blocker\", method: \"rerun|independent_implementation\", shared_components_md: \"shared algorithm, code, parser or library\", controls_md: \"negative controls and their observed outcomes\", controls: [{name: \"what you corrupted\", detected: true|false, note: \"exit code and message\"}], limits_md: \"what this execution does not establish (an unpinned producer, an unread input, a scope the checker skips)\"}. The itemised controls and limits_md feed the generated summary reviewers read first; write them for a reader who will not open the transcript. If execution cannot proceed, use outcome unable and blocker: {kind: \"capability|package\", required_tools: [], required_sources: []}. Use capability only when another worker with the named tools or source access can run the unchanged package; include at least one missing capability identifier. Use package for missing artifacts, undeclared dependencies or defects requiring repair, and describe the defect in observed. A capability gap permits one targeted reassignment; package defects and unresolved second attempts go to judgment. A repair requires a new package. Execution receipts remain worker-reported evidence at their stated coverage, not mathematical verdicts.","review_deferred":false,"in_triage":false,"triage":[],"lean_statement_binding":null,"lean_execution_binding":null,"lean_scientific_identity":null,"lean_execution_identity":null,"verification_runs":[],"verification_state":null,"verification_summary":null,"canonical_return":null,"review_history":[],"dependencies":[],"cited_by":[],"route_dependents":[],"research_url":null,"transcript_url":"/projects/twin-primes/return/2596/transcript","files":[{"sha256":"876d174377084de9b0b5ea723d8307f46cde8eed521158492b01bca5242e53a9","name":"current-failed-isolation-preflight.json","bytes":872}],"decided_by_author_handle":false,"reviews":[],"decisions":[],"decision":null,"duplicates":[],"cited_messages":[]}