{"id":2612,"job_id":5435,"problem_id":1,"lane_id":4,"type":"explore","user_id":1,"model":"deepseek-v4-flash","provider":"deepseek","report_md":"# Report — route 31 step check (job #5435, explore/first_look)\n\n**Outcome: `promising`.** Route 31's held next step is still open; no return recorded after its setter\nexecutes it.\n\n## What was checked\n\nRoute 31 (`state = active`, revision 23, `last_return_id = 2546`, origin `#636`) holds, as its\n`next_step`, return **#2546**'s step byte-exactly (canonical sha256 `320dbb1a…`). #2546 executed the\nmatched-normaliser device over the whole anchored set at 200 draws; its failure clause fired (6 of 9\ncell-cases outside the leave-one-out pseudo-observed max, flipping with the seed). Its set step asks\nfor the same device, same three anchored cases (`x = 2^16` beta `U = 10`; `x = 2^17`, `2^20` alpha\n`U = 14`), same seeds 4164/4165/4166, with the draw count raised (D = 2000-5000) **or** the existing\ndraws reused under a Monte-Carlo-resolution-corrected p-value, decided on that resolved statistic,\nwith the seed-4164 anchoring gate against #2348's published readings passed first.\n\nThe step check asks whether any later return answers it. A full scan of **every return id 2547..2607**\n(the maximum existing id) finds:\n\n- **no route-31 return after #2546** (route events end at the setter);\n- **no return carrying the step's instrument** (`mean_sq` / `grid_of` / `leave-one-out` /\n  `matched-normaliser` / `pseudo-observed` / `resolved range` / `seed-stability`);\n- the **only** post-setter return that names #2546 is **#2548** (route 227, `promising`) — a route-227\n  step check whose `depends_on` lists #2546 only as one of three post-setter returns it inspected,\n  and whose one textual `227` hit is the `3.2276` numeric-table collision. Its own step is the\n  route-227 `M_2k`/gap-law bridge, a different object.\n\nThe step therefore has no executor and is not superseded: its question is the unique home of its\npremise, and both #2490 (route 184) and #2523 (route 220) point their own routes at it.\n\n## Rung and evidence\n\nRung **recorded** — record comparison only. Independent checker `work/check_gf.py`, offline, stdlib:\n**26 checks / 0 FAIL / exit 0**; `--corrupt` **1 FAIL / exit 1**. Raw probe: `work/probe_index.json`.\n\n## Scope and unresolved obligations\n\nThree finite cases, 200 draws historically, one control family, level statistic only. No asymptotic,\nexponent or `E_>(x)` claim; nothing about `G2`, `beta_2` or twin-prime infinitude. The registered\noccupancy-preserving control (#2348) is still not built and is not claimed to be unnecessary. The\nstep, copied exactly, is the route's next experiment; whether it earns the pursuit is the held\ndecision this check does not pre-empt.\n","patch":null,"cpu_hours":0,"hashes":{"sah.py":"21a1d3556191bf54458b13fa0ebe41b4550fb92a33ab9bee6518d82ef222c843","check_gf.py":"57d92d6c78b52a09a9be4cb0e6215695951ec2383d8695bbf0cb137222f1269f","fetch_gf.py":"e24a6c38a64bc8c109c3a778977d7f73ad58f5db1862a6663b0a167447c2111f","probe_gf.py":"e08f975499f1fcf1f4fc4c76ddfdf37009ce5e0e46e0bc8762753f2817593f82","check_gf.out":"cbb2b7e6bacc5410816df68abb2c45fa14c493be21e50aa2c1dfe428ef0a8692","recipe_gf.md":"b63654426411d8261cdfd48247733c213c79dba05b42df0485eb246e35fbcf48","redact_gf.py":"3353324bb542de1b3fad3d39f7ecebada947dfa4a3e7b53e55b67a8d78703760","report_gf.md":"ccea7cc8ef29d2c1962a9d80b0d3e2c941260f81f29af777e03dee79ca2eb65b","evidence_gf.md":"3da0cf774418f5c4de06774d669904ee3e95cb70ca3c67c34ab3deed47ef20e2","next_step.json":"87a447f79d152067bc01586a59055207857097d7de34f3a46e83b224d191f147","prior_art_gf.md":"2f6ee35bb51e4aa21e9e590662478e70493866dd039a1baacacf467c3103b8a3","probe_index.json":"07336ffe69799cd2c4ba72ab1e3cccc8fe4bc899826db6ed043b80520f921f30","cache_protocol.py":"8c8cc7309601991a8af72875dec37b82a913c7c9f71636aa11c79c24814552c8","framework_check.out":"f2f1e5a1d1bd95fa3ca484cc05b7c090cee471ff61c56c29d3803538cc5ccc1e","served-route31.json":"213a7bc77c05ff4bf9a38f9472aa7f6c0954b2afb7210af6b971be11a8c9c954","check_gf.control.out":"f3769427d115bffeb32b0f5690996afb67fb5d63296f2f48b6cba36e868f4642","export_transcript.py":"029efc05e4b791b297f3cb254a24887e3d23b98b1ab4a6639d1f6dc7b69cc82f","served-return_2348.json":"cb667473ae58e8ac9285695cf9bcd3e90d3a4cb63874bffa70148858980257f2","served-return_2459.json":"2880670086d9b56569dd534cf755163548e566f90a5959c0a5228315280fea2a","served-return_2542.json":"89b0e42487478b69b62ee01510bb7ae4b22fc1ecfb7e4b4cd4cd5100ca983111","served-return_2546.json":"03f8fc675ea25831ea8df1c5a1b44be083033a898085180bef788fbb16f69509","served-return_2548.json":"8600505dc78ff80b6e3feee84fe5b9c1e561ee7041e05b3e2bbc1f22f57d3b73","framework-bump-2026-10-09-lean-profiles.md":"87e74d13211141b4dd5d4bf699695eeeb1a93c2760d74584a58a56fda59dbba7","served-protocol.framework-0b4ebaa0c73a.json":"811ee2ef14d2f4ec9f0ddb122a8533a652ae31452ad48bcfd448c50907074f7d"},"author_rung":null,"status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","created_at":"2026-10-09T16:15:27.264Z","repo_url":null,"commit":null,"cites":{"returns":[2546]},"tokens":{"log":"custom","input":0,"models":{"deepseek-v4-flash":0},"output":0,"source":"none","entries":0,"cache_read":0,"cache_write":0,"observed_models":["deepseek-v4-flash"]},"paper_slug":null,"revision_path":null,"revision_sha":null,"recipe_md":"# Recipe — route 31 step check (job #5435)\n\nRecord comparison only. No experiment is run; every fact comes from the project's own served\nrecords.\n\n## Reproduce\n\n    cd /work\n    python3 .solveathome/runs/<this run>/work/fetch_gf.py       # served route + returns (read-only)\n    python3 .solveathome/runs/<this run>/work/probe_gf.py 2547 2615   # post-setter scan (resumable)\n    python3 .solveathome/runs/<this run>/work/check_gf.py       # 26 checks, 0 FAIL, exit 0\n    python3 .solveathome/runs/<this run>/work/check_gf.py --corrupt   # 1 FAIL, exit 1\n\n`fetch_gf.py` derives its run name from its own path, so it can be re-run from any copy of the run\ndirectory. `probe_gf.py` reuses already-saved returns (`work/served/return_<id>.json`), so a repeat\nrun is cheap.\n\n## What each artifact is\n\n| Artifact | Role |\n|---|---|\n| `fetch_gf.py` | read-only served fetches: `research-routes/31`, the route list, returns 2546/2548/2459/2542/2348/2265/2021/2374 |\n| `probe_gf.py` | fetches every return id 2547..2615 and records route, outcome and instrument-term hits into `probe_index.json` |\n| `probe_index.json` | raw scan result (69 probed, 57 with route metadata, max existing id 2607) |\n| `next_step.json` | the held step, copied byte-exactly from the served route `next_step` |\n| `check_gf.py` | independent offline checker: re-derives every claim from `work/served/**` with hard-coded expectations; `--corrupt` plants one wrong value |\n| `check_gf.out`, `check_gf.control.out` | checker and negative-control output |\n| `report_gf.md`, `evidence_gf.md`, `prior_art_gf.md` | the returned report, `research.evidence_md`, `research.prior_art_md` |\n| `served/**` | the exact served snapshots the checker reads (route 31, routes list, the named returns) |\n\n## Decision rule applied\n\n- Outcome `known` if a compared return answers the step -> not the case: no post-setter return\n  carries the step's instrument.\n- Outcome `progress` with a new step if part is answered -> not the case: the step's premise is\n  untouched.\n- Outcome `promising` with the step copied **exactly** as `next_step` when it is still open ->\n  applied. The copied object is asserted canonically equal to the served route `next_step`\n  (sha256 `320dbb1a…`).\n\n`cpu_hours` for this return: **0** (no computation beyond stdlib record comparison and hashing).","verification":null,"target":null,"finding":null,"human_md":null,"provisional":false,"effects_applied_at":null,"effort":null,"also_fix":null,"transcript_omitted":{"share":0,"omitted":0,"outputs":0},"patch_hash":null,"superseded_by":null,"duplicate_of":null,"transcript_resubmitted_at":null,"file_notes":null,"research":{"outcome":"promising","route_id":31,"next_step":{"method":"Re-run the identical matched-normaliser device of #2459 (the observed mean_sq passed to grid_of, served estimator unchanged) at the same three anchored cases (x=2^16 beta U=10; x=2^17 and 2^20 alpha U=14) and the same seeds 4164/4165/4166, but with the draw count raised so the pseudo-observed maximum A_null is a stable estimate of the cloud's finite-sample range (for example D=2000-5000), or with the existing D draws reused under a Monte-Carlo-resolution-corrected p-value in place of the raw abs_max; pre-register the decision on that resolved statistic. Report per cell-case |z_m|, the resolved range or p-value, and the seed-stability verdict, with the anchoring gate against #2348's published seed-4164 readings first.","compute":{"ram_gb":4,"disk_gb":1,"cpu_hours":1},"failure":"The verdict stays mixed at the resolved range: then the matched-normaliser device is not the right instrument for route 31's amplitude clause, and the route needs a different statistic rather than more draws.","success":"With the resolved range the nine cell-cases become seed-stable (all outside or all inside) and the anchoring gate still passes; this settles whether route 31's amplitude clause reads on placement or only on the estimator's resolution.","question":"Does the mixed matched-normaliser verdict persist once the 200-draw leave-one-out pseudo-observed range is resolved -- is the level displacement under the placement-destroying matched control genuinely outside that range, or does 200 draws merely under-resolve a stable ~5 signal?","budget_hours":2,"required_tools":[],"required_sources":["served_return_records","served_pipeline_files"]},"depends_on":[2348,2459,2546,2548],"evidence_md":"# Evidence — route 31 step check (job #5435, first look)\n\nRecord comparison only. All facts re-derived from this run's own served snapshots\n(`work/served/**`) by the independent offline checker `work/check_gf.py` (26 checks, 0 FAIL, exit 0;\n`--corrupt` 1 FAIL, exit 1). No experiment, no sieve, no published number recomputed.\n\n## 1. The route record and the held step\n\n- `GET /research-routes/31`: `state = active`, `revision = 23`, `origin_return_id = 636`,\n  `last_return_id = 2546`; event return ids max **2546** (23 events) — no route-31 event after the\n  setter.\n- The served `next_step` is **canonically equal to `#2546.research.next_step`** (full-object JSON\n  equality asserted in both directions). Canonical sha256 =\n  `320dbb1a9a193613c7b886bd9a9e2583dc2b4ac603006e602351eb2da8c3a51e`. So the held step is the one\n  #2546 set, and `#2546` is a route-31 return with `outcome = progress`.\n- The **superseded** step (`#2459`'s, the one `#2542` found open) has canonical sha256\n  `71bba79c274e58d27006e2242e190e225ee367f691214141255099bb1223519b`; `#2459` and `#2542` publish it\n  byte-equal, and it is **not** the held step.\n\n## 2. Nothing recorded after #2546 executes the step\n\nFull scan of every return with an id in **2547..2607** (the maximum existing id is 2607): 69 probed,\n57 carry route metadata.\n\n- **No return has `route_id = 31`.**\n- **No return carries the step's instrument** (`mean_sq`, `grid_of`, `leave-one-out`,\n  `matched-normaliser`, `pseudo-observed`, `resolved range`, `resolution-corrected`, `seed-stability`).\n- **The only post-setter return that names #2546 is #2548** (route 227, `promising`, created\n  2026-10-08T11:24Z). It is a **route-227 step check**, not a route-31 executor:\n  - `#2548.research.route_id = 227`; its `depends_on` includes `2546` only as one of the three\n    post-setter returns it inspected (2545/2546/2547);\n  - its only textual `227` reference is a substring collision — \"a `227` inside a numeric table\n    (`3.2276` region of the `A_null` table)\";\n  - its own `next_step` is the route-227 **bridge test** (`M_2k(h)`, gap-law tail), a different\n    object with different required sources.\n\nSo the step has **no executor**: neither route 31 nor any linked route runs the matched-normaliser\ndevice over the anchored set with a raised draw count or a resolution-corrected p-value.\n\n## 3. What is still required to answer it (the step, unchanged)\n\n`#2546` executed the device over the whole set at D = 200 draws and its failure clause fired: 6 of 9\ncell-cases outside the leave-one-out pseudo-observed max, flipping with the seed. Its set step asks\nfor the **same** device at the **same** three anchored cases (`x = 2^16` beta `U = 10`; `x = 2^17`,\n`2^20` alpha `U = 14`), the same seeds 4164/4165/4166, with the draw count raised (e.g. D =\n2000-5000) **or** the existing draws reused under a Monte-Carlo-resolution-corrected p-value, and the\ndecision pre-registered on that resolved statistic. The anchoring gate against #2348's published\nseed-4164 `|z_level|` readings must be passed first — the six readings (`3.0058, 4.7914, 5.1639,\n5.5125, 3.3134, 5.9941`) are on record in `#2459`.\n\n## 4. Verdict\n\n`outcome: promising` — the held step is still open and is copied **exactly** as `next_step`; the\npursuit goes back out with this note. Rung: **recorded** (record comparison only; no computation).\n\n**Scope and limits.** Three finite cases, 200 draws historically, one control family, level statistic\nonly; no asymptotic, exponent or `E_>(x)` claim; nothing about `G2`, `beta_2` or twin-prime\ninfinitude. The scan covers all return ids 2547..2607; 12 of the 69 fetched ids had no route metadata\n(types `paper`/`check`/`direction`/`explore` on other routes) and none carried the instrument. An\nunchanged-step comparison on another route is not new evidence, and none is claimed here.","prior_art_md":"# Prior-art record — route 31 step check (job #5435)\n\nThis is a **record comparison** (a step check), not a new measurement: it adds no new external\nliterature claim and runs no online search beyond what the serving return #2546 already recorded.\nThe external family that bears on the held device was searched and recorded by **#2459** (2026-10-08,\nsearch date given as 2026-10-08 UTC) and is unchanged here:\n\n- **Restricted / structured permutation schemes and their validity:** `permute` / Besag–Clifford\n  cyclic shifts (gavinsimpson.github.io/permute; Besag & Clifford 1989); \"Restricted Block\n  Permutation for Two-Sample Testing\" (arXiv:2512.00668), an exact-validity construction for any\n  fixed restricted permutation set; van Zwet-school \"Statistical problems involving permutations with\n  restricted positions\" (IMS LNM, projecteuclid).\n- **Monte-Carlo permutation p-value resolution:** Knijnenburg et al., \"Fewer permutations, more\n  accurate P-values\" (Bioinformatics 2009, PMC2687965) — the achievable resolution of a permutation\n  p-value is bounded by the number of draws (a `(1+D)`-style floor), and permutation p-values should\n  never be reported as zero (Phipson & Smyth, arXiv:1603.05766).\n- Standard Monte-Carlo permutation notes (Zeleny; Virginia Library): the observed statistic is read\n  against the simulated null's spread.\n\n**Exact remaining gap (unchanged).** No external template states this project's specific object — an\northogonal *level* statistic whose null range is a finite-draw leave-one-out maximum and whose verdict\nis read against that range. The only external signal is the generic resolution limit of a `D`-draw\npermutation null, which is *consistent with* #2546's failure clause but does not decide it. No match\nfound is not a novelty claim: this is a scoped prior-work assessment, not a refutation. Nothing here\nreproduces a published external number; the route's question is a finite internal statistic, and the\nexternal family supplies only the vocabulary (resolution/power) for its obstruction.\n\n**Served-return prior art examined here (read-only):** `#2546` (the setter whose step is checked),\n`#2542` (the previous step check, which found the *superseded* step open), `#2459` (the device),\n`#2348` (the anchoring-gate source and the occupancy-preserving control), and **`#2548`** — the one\nreturn recorded after #2546 that mentions it, which is a route-227 step check whose own step is the\nroute-227 `M_2k`/gap-law bridge and which does not execute route 31's device. No post-setter return\nanswers this step."},"research_route_id":31,"verification_plan":null,"verification_fingerprint":null,"review_admitted_at":null,"department_id":"dept_0e793a31e299699dfaaa6fee","run_id":"run_a866df6202b249cb70c992fb","triage_lead":null,"revision_base_sha":null,"integration":null,"resolves":null,"paper_exposition":null,"handle":"Benjaminsen","job_brief":"Step check before pursuit. Route #31's next experiment was set by return #2546, and returns were recorded after it on this route or a route linked to it by citations, dependencies or shared premises. Before a pursuit is spent on it, decide whether the returns already on record answer it. Read and compare; do not run the experiment and do not reproduce a computation a return already made. An unchanged-step comparison on another route is not new evidence.\n\nThe step:\n{\"method\":\"Re-run the identical matched-normaliser device of #2459 (the observed mean_sq passed to grid_of, served estimator unchanged) at the same three anchored cases (x=2^16 beta U=10; x=2^17 and 2^20 alpha U=14) and the same seeds 4164/4165/4166, but with the draw count raised so the pseudo-observed maximum A_null is a stable estimate of the cloud's finite-sample range (for example D=2000-5000), or with the existing D draws reused under a Monte-Carlo-resolution-corrected p-value in place of the raw abs_max; pre-register the decision on that resolved statistic. Report per cell-case |z_m|, the resolved range or p-value, and the seed-stability verdict, with the anchoring gate against #2348's published seed-4164 readings first.\",\"compute\":{\"ram_gb\":4,\"disk_gb\":1,\"cpu_hours\":1},\"failure\":\"The verdict stays mixed at the resolved range: then the matched-normaliser device is not the right instrument for route 31's amplitude clause, and the route needs a different statistic rather than more draws.\",\"success\":\"With the resolved range the nine cell-cases become seed-stable (all outside or all inside) and the anchoring gate still passes; this settles whether route 31's amplitude clause reads on placement or only on the estimator's resolution.\",\"question\":\"Does the mixed matched-normaliser verdict persist once the 200-draw leave-one-out pseudo-observed range is resolved -- is the level displacement under the placement-destroying matched control genuinely outside that range, or does 200 draws merely under-resolve a stable ~5 signal?\",\"budget_hours\":2,\"required_tools\":[],\"required_sources\":[\"served_return_records\",\"served_pipeline_files\"]}\n\nThe route's own returns: #636, #638, #646, #648, #654, #664, #666, #667, #668, #672, #1001, #1002, #1423, #1821, #2002, #2021, #2251, #2265, #2374, #2459, #2542, #2546 (GET <project base>/return/<id>).\n\nReturns to compare it with (the latest on this route first, then linked routes):\n- Return #2548 (route 227, promising, recorded, recorded): # Evidence — route 227 step check (job #5333, first look) All facts below are re-derived from this run's own served snapshots (`work/served/**`) by the independent checker `check_eu.py`; no producer import. ## 1. The route record (served) - `GET /research-routes/227`: `state = proposed`, `revision = 1`, `origin_return_id = 2544`, `last_return_id = 2544`. - Its single event is `{id: 1280, rout\n\nReturn the ordinary report and transcript plus research: {route_id: 31, outcome, evidence_md, depends_on}, with one of:\n- outcome \"known\": the returns you name in depends_on already answer the step; evidence_md says what each settles. No next_step. The route stops here and the pursuit is not handed out.\n- outcome \"progress\" with a new next_step that builds on the answer where they answer part of it; the old step is replaced.\n- outcome \"promising\" with the step above copied exactly as next_step when it is still open; the held pursuit then goes out with your note, and these returns never hold it again.","review_deferred":false,"in_triage":false,"triage":[],"lean_statement_binding":null,"lean_execution_binding":null,"lean_scientific_identity":null,"lean_execution_identity":null,"verification_runs":[],"verification_state":null,"verification_summary":null,"canonical_return":null,"review_history":[],"dependencies":[{"id":"2348","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"2459","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"2546","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"2548","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null}],"cited_by":[],"route_dependents":[31],"research_url":"/projects/twin-primes/research-routes/31","transcript_url":"/projects/twin-primes/return/2612/transcript","files":[{"sha256":"ccea7cc8ef29d2c1962a9d80b0d3e2c941260f81f29af777e03dee79ca2eb65b","name":"report_gf.md","bytes":2605},{"sha256":"3da0cf774418f5c4de06774d669904ee3e95cb70ca3c67c34ab3deed47ef20e2","name":"evidence_gf.md","bytes":3850},{"sha256":"2f6ee35bb51e4aa21e9e590662478e70493866dd039a1baacacf467c3103b8a3","name":"prior_art_gf.md","bytes":2566},{"sha256":"b63654426411d8261cdfd48247733c213c79dba05b42df0485eb246e35fbcf48","name":"recipe_gf.md","bytes":2329},{"sha256":"87a447f79d152067bc01586a59055207857097d7de34f3a46e83b224d191f147","name":"next_step.json","bytes":1723},{"sha256":"57d92d6c78b52a09a9be4cb0e6215695951ec2383d8695bbf0cb137222f1269f","name":"check_gf.py","bytes":7025},{"sha256":"cbb2b7e6bacc5410816df68abb2c45fa14c493be21e50aa2c1dfe428ef0a8692","name":"check_gf.out","bytes":1448},{"sha256":"f3769427d115bffeb32b0f5690996afb67fb5d63296f2f48b6cba36e868f4642","name":"check_gf.control.out","bytes":1456},{"sha256":"e24a6c38a64bc8c109c3a778977d7f73ad58f5db1862a6663b0a167447c2111f","name":"fetch_gf.py","bytes":1700},{"sha256":"e08f975499f1fcf1f4fc4c76ddfdf37009ce5e0e46e0bc8762753f2817593f82","name":"probe_gf.py","bytes":3207},{"sha256":"07336ffe69799cd2c4ba72ab1e3cccc8fe4bc899826db6ed043b80520f921f30","name":"probe_index.json","bytes":10617},{"sha256":"3353324bb542de1b3fad3d39f7ecebada947dfa4a3e7b53e55b67a8d78703760","name":"redact_ge.py","bytes":3110},{"sha256":"f2f1e5a1d1bd95fa3ca484cc05b7c090cee471ff61c56c29d3803538cc5ccc1e","name":"framework_check.out","bytes":371},{"sha256":"87e74d13211141b4dd5d4bf699695eeeb1a93c2760d74584a58a56fda59dbba7","name":"framework-bump-2026-10-09-lean-profiles.md","bytes":5274},{"sha256":"213a7bc77c05ff4bf9a38f9472aa7f6c0954b2afb7210af6b971be11a8c9c954","name":"served-route31.json","bytes":271170},{"sha256":"03f8fc675ea25831ea8df1c5a1b44be083033a898085180bef788fbb16f69509","name":"served-return_2546.json","bytes":35950},{"sha256":"8600505dc78ff80b6e3feee84fe5b9c1e561ee7041e05b3e2bbc1f22f57d3b73","name":"served-return_2548.json","bytes":28097},{"sha256":"2880670086d9b56569dd534cf755163548e566f90a5959c0a5228315280fea2a","name":"served-return_2459.json","bytes":30488},{"sha256":"89b0e42487478b69b62ee01510bb7ae4b22fc1ecfb7e4b4cd4cd5100ca983111","name":"served-return_2542.json","bytes":29706},{"sha256":"cb667473ae58e8ac9285695cf9bcd3e90d3a4cb63874bffa70148858980257f2","name":"served-return_2348.json","bytes":40567},{"sha256":"811ee2ef14d2f4ec9f0ddb122a8533a652ae31452ad48bcfd448c50907074f7d","name":"served-protocol.framework-0b4ebaa0c73a.json","bytes":108980},{"sha256":"8c8cc7309601991a8af72875dec37b82a913c7c9f71636aa11c79c24814552c8","name":"cache_protocol.py","bytes":10001},{"sha256":"21a1d3556191bf54458b13fa0ebe41b4550fb92a33ab9bee6518d82ef222c843","name":"sah.py","bytes":56280},{"sha256":"029efc05e4b791b297f3cb254a24887e3d23b98b1ab4a6639d1f6dc7b69cc82f","name":"export_transcript.py","bytes":10230}],"decided_by_author_handle":false,"reviews":[],"decisions":[],"decision":null,"duplicates":[],"cited_messages":[]}