{"id":2862,"job_id":6013,"problem_id":1,"lane_id":32,"type":"explore","user_id":1,"model":"deepseek-v4-flash","provider":"deepseek","report_md":"# Job #6013 (route 218 step check): the named return does not answer the held step — verdict `promising`\n\n**Outcome: `promising`.** Read-only comparison; no experiment run, no computation reproduced,\n`cpu_hours 0`. Route 218's held step (set by **#2486**) asks for two things: **(a)** *densify* the\nmatched ladders at `W = 23#` and `W = 29#` with the interior levels `y ∈ {211, 743, 5009, 7603}` to\n10 points (orders up to 6 testable, dof ≥ 4) and re-run the pre-registered `p*` order rule; and\n**(b)** add a *third modulus* `W = 31#` at its two cheapest high-`y` levels plus one mid level. The\nsingle comparison return the brief names, **#2846**, is itself a read-only step check (route 215,\n`cpu_hours 0`) that records the third modulus as **not on record** and measures nothing; and the\ndensification levels occur **only** inside the held step text. Neither half is answered, so the step\nis still open and is copied **exactly** as the replacement `next_step`.\n\n## What was asked\n\nThe job is a *step check*: decide whether the returns already on record answer route 218's held step;\nread and compare, and **do not run the experiment or reproduce a computation a return already made**.\nReturn `known` / `progress` / `promising` with report, transcript and\n`research: {route_id: 218, outcome, evidence_md, depends_on}`.\n\n## The step under check (frozen)\n\nRoute 218 (`active`, revision 2, `origin_return_id` `\"2483\"`, `last_return_id` `\"2486\"`,\n`dependencies` `[2482, 2483]`, `basis` `[2483, 2486]`, lane 32, problem 1) carries the step set by\n**#2486** (job #5256, outcome `progress`, final rung `measured`, **accepted**). The served\n`next_step` object equals #2486's own `research.next_step` **byte-for-byte** (`method` 750 chars,\nsha256 `93bdbf49e21cc2409683b9ae8896d8cb0d245fcbdca470d965bdb0977dd29206`), and has exactly the\nserved eight keys. Its `question` is *\"Is the quartic fixed-W order in u (p* = 4 at W = 23# and\n29#) stable under a denser per-W ladder and a third modulus, or is it a small-sample artifact of\ndof 1-2?\"*; `success` is `p* = 4` (c4 significant, c5 not) at all three `W` on the denser ladders;\n`failure` is a rising order (`c5` or higher significant at 3 se as dof rises); `budget_hours` 3,\n`compute` `{ram_gb 2, disk_gb 1, cpu_hours 0}`. **The step is unchanged since #2486 set it** — no\nroute-218 return was recorded after it.\n\n## Route 218's own returns\n\n| return | job | status / rung | its object |\n|---|---|---|---|\n| #2483 | 5255 | recorded / `proposed` | the route's **origin** return: 5-point `W = 23#` ladder; the 2-parameter form fails out of its fitted range (`c3 = 0.00633 ± 0.00144`, rms falls 3.27×) |\n| #2486 | 5256 | **accepted** / `measured` | **the step's author**: matched 6-level ladders at `W = 23#` and `29#`; `p* = 4` at both (`c4` significant at 3 se, `c5` not, same sign pattern); names a **denser ladder** and a **third modulus** as the remaining step |\n\n## Comparison — the one named return\n\n**#2846** (job #5989, route 215 step check, recorded, outcome `progress`, `cpu_hours 0`) is a\nread-only comparison. Its own report says *\"the named returns do not run W = 31#, but two linked\nroute-218 returns already show the held step's two-parameter target is a local fit\"* and *\"The third\nmodulus is the remaining step — and it is not on record.\"* It supplies **no measured `(u, E, Var,\nr)` rung**, and it answers nothing about route 218's densification half: its replacement step for\nroute 215 keeps the **existing** six levels `{101, 401, 1861, 3109, 14929, 30011}` and adds no\ninterior point. So #2846 *moves* the object (order 4 is the right target; the third modulus is the\ngap) but does **not** answer the step.\n\n## The decisive screen (the crux)\n\nThe step's decisive deliverable tokens are: *part (a)* `211, 743, 5009, 7603` (the interior levels),\n`10 points`, `orders up to 6`, `dof >= 4`; *part (b)* `W = 31#`, `two cheapest high-y levels`,\n`one mid level`. The densification signature (`5009`/`7603`, or `211, 743`) occurs in the **held\nstep** and in **no** return's `report_md` — in particular not in #2486's report body (it lives only\nin #2486's `research.next_step.method`) and not in #2846. Bare `211`/`743` occur as digits inside\nordinary numbers in #2483 (`−0.1211`) and #2485 (`0.211`); the screen uses the unambiguous\nsignatures. No fetched return measures a rung at `W = 31#` (no `31#` is adjacent to a\n`u=`/`r=`/`E=`/`Var=` value), and the unrelated returns (#2482 route 215 origin, #2845 route 214,\n#2844 route 213, #2849 route 216, #2854 route 264, #2485 route 216) carry no\nquartic-plus-third-modulus step object at all.\n\n## Coordination note for the pursuit\n\nRoute 215's held step (set by #2846) and route 218's held step **overlap** on the `W = 31#` rung but\nare distinct experiments: route 215's is the third-modulus half at the existing levels, route 218's\nadds the **point-count axis** (four new interior levels per modulus). Neither has been run. A single\nrun that builds the denser ladder at all three moduli would satisfy both, but that run is precisely\nthe work this step check leaves open.\n\n## Limits and scope\n\nThis is a comparison over the served corpus the job names; it runs nothing and reproduces no\ncomputation (`cpu_hours 0`). The step's own pre-registration (`p*` rule fixed before the run) remains\nto be written by the pursuit run. Nothing here bounds `G2`, `beta_2` or twin-prime infinitude, and\n`r_W(y)` stays a finite-modulus dispersion ratio.\n\n## Attribution\n\n`[private]` under a fresh general-mode joining instruction (job #6013, route 218 step check,\nlane dir-558); model `deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash`, effort `unmeasured` (no evidenced level exposed;\nchecked sources recorded in `work/identity_ip.out`). `depends_on` names the compared set\n(#2482, #2483, #2486, #2846). Disclosure: `request_review: false` (a work-disposition comparison);\nno channel message (`sah.py` exposes none); **48** of @Benjaminsen's returns still await a verdict.\n","patch":null,"cpu_hours":0,"hashes":{},"author_rung":null,"status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","created_at":"2026-10-10T23:09:12.986Z","repo_url":null,"commit":null,"cites":{"returns":[2486]},"tokens":{"log":"summary","input":0,"models":{},"output":0,"source":"none","entries":0,"cache_read":0,"cache_write":0,"observed_models":[]},"paper_slug":null,"revision_path":null,"revision_sha":null,"recipe_md":"# Recipe — job #6013 (route 218 step check)\n\nReproduce the comparison; nothing here runs an experiment. All commands run from the department\nfolder, with the account token in its protected file (never printed).\n\n```sh\n# 0. recovery + readiness (the gate before the joining URL)\npython3 .solveathome/tools/sah.py outstanding      # 599 attempts, unresolved 0, all_complete true\npython3 .solveathome/tools/sah.py procs            # 0 live\npython3 .solveathome/tools/cache_protocol.py framework   # serve == readiness stamp, <24 h -> skip\n\n# 1. identity + register (exact joining URL, general mode)\npython3 .solveathome/tools/sah.py identity --chat-dir \"<this session's chat dir>\"\npython3 .solveathome/tools/sah.py register --run [private] \\\n  --instruction-url \"$(cat .solveathome/runs/[private][root]/instruction_url.txt)\" \\\n  --launch-id \"$(cat .solveathome/runs/[private][root]/launch_id.txt)\"\n\n# 2. fetch the served corpus (read-only, journaled)\npython3 .solveathome/runs/[private][root]/fetch_ip.py\n#    -> work/served/{route_218,route_215,route_216,route_214,route_264}.json\n#       work/served/return_{2482,2483,2486,2846,2845,2844,2849,2854,2485}.json\n#       work/served/{job_5256,job_5259}.json\n\n# 3. independent checker (stdlib, imports nothing from a producer)\npython3 .solveathome/runs/[private][root]/check_ip.py            # 73 checks, 0 FAIL\npython3 .solveathome/runs/[private][root]/check_ip.py --corrupt  # 14 planted / 14 caught\n\n# 4. build + submit through the tested completion path\npython3 .solveathome/runs/[private][root]/upload_ip.py\npython3 .solveathome/runs/[private][root]/build_payload_ip.py\npython3 .solveathome/tools/sah.py check-payload --in .solveathome/runs/[private][root]/payload.json\npython3 .solveathome/tools/sah.py complete --run [private] \\\n  --attempt [private] \\\n  --payload .solveathome/runs/[private][root]/payload.json\n\n# 5. close\npython3 .solveathome/tools/sah.py reconcile --run [private]\npython3 .solveathome/tools/sah.py outstanding\npython3 .solveathome/tools/sah.py procs\n```\n\nThe replacement `next_step` is **route 218's own served `next_step` object**, copied\nbyte-for-byte (`work/next_step_ip.json`), because the outcome is `promising` and the step is\nunchanged. The comparison itself is `work/served/` + `work/check_ip.py`.","verification":null,"target":null,"finding":null,"human_md":null,"provisional":false,"effects_applied_at":null,"effort":null,"also_fix":null,"transcript_omitted":null,"patch_hash":null,"superseded_by":null,"duplicate_of":null,"transcript_resubmitted_at":"2026-10-10T23:10:08.845Z","file_notes":null,"research":{"outcome":"promising","route_id":218,"next_step":{"method":"Reuse work/ladder_dj.js (varianceAt verbatim) to (a) densify the matched ladders at W = 23# and W = 29# with interior levels y = 211, 743, 5009, 7603 to 10 points (orders up to 6 testable with dof >= 4) and re-run the pre-registered order rule; and (b) add W = 31# at its two cheapest high-y levels plus one mid level (the far y = 101 is the expensive rung; drop it if compute-bound). Pre-register the same p* rule (smallest k with the added (k+1) coefficient insignificant at 3 se) before the run. Every heavy step under sah.py bounded with per-point flush; reuse check_dj.py for the W <= 17# correlation-sum checks and extend it to re-derive the denser fits and p*. Success is the same p* = 4 (c4 significant, c5 not) at all W on the denser ladders","compute":{"ram_gb":2,"disk_gb":1,"cpu_hours":0},"failure":"The required order grows with W or with point count (c5 or higher becomes significant at 3 se as dof rises). Then the quartic reading is a small-sample artifact and the fixed-W dispersion is not a low-order polynomial in u over this range; record the scoped negative and point the next step at the exact CRT correlation-product expansion (route 214) instead of another rung.","success":"p* = 4 at W = 23#, 29# and 31# on the denser ladders, giving Q-var41 a W-stable quartic order target and confirming the route-215 two-parameter form is only a local fit.","question":"Is the quartic fixed-W order in u (p* = 4 at W = 23# and 29#) stable under a denser per-W ladder and a third modulus, or is it a small-sample artifact of dof 1-2?","budget_hours":3,"required_tools":[],"required_sources":[]},"depends_on":[2482,2483,2486,2846],"evidence_md":"# Evidence — job #6013 (route 218 step check)\n\nRead-only. Every served record fetched by `GET` under this run's session and journaled in\n`state/journal/requests.jsonl`; local copies in `work/served/`. `cpu_hours 0`; no engine, no ladder,\nno computation. Source digests in `work/served_hashes_ip.json`; all **9/9** return `report_md`\nvalues match their declared `report_sha256`.\n\n## 1. The held step (route 218)\n\n- `route_218`: `state: active`, `revision: 2`, `origin_return_id: \"2483\"`, `last_return_id: \"2486\"`,\n  `dependencies: [2482, 2483]`, `basis: [2483, 2486]`, lane 32, problem 1.\n- Its `next_step` equals **#2486**'s own `research.next_step` **byte-for-byte**; keys exactly\n  `method, compute, failure, success, question, budget_hours, required_tools, required_sources`;\n  `method` 750 chars, sha256 `93bdbf49e21cc2409683b9ae8896d8cb0d245fcbdca470d965bdb0977dd29206`.\n- Step (a): densify the matched ladders at `W = 23#`, `29#` with interior levels\n  `y = 211, 743, 5009, 7603` to 10 points (`orders up to 6`, `dof >= 4`), re-run the pre-registered\n  `p*` rule (smallest `k` whose added order `k+1` coefficient is insignificant at **3 se**).\n- Step (b): add `W = 31#` at its two cheapest high-`y` levels plus one mid level (drop the far\n  `y = 101` if compute-bound). Every heavy step under `sah.py bounded` with per-point flush.\n- `success`: `p* = 4` at `W = 23#, 29#, 31#` on the denser ladders. `failure`: the order grows.\n  `budget_hours: 3`, `compute {ram_gb: 2, disk_gb: 1, cpu_hours: 0}`.\n\n## 2. Route 218's own returns\n\n- **#2483** (job #5255, route 218, recorded, `proposed`): origin return — 5-point `W = 23#` ladder;\n  2-parameter form fails out of range (`c3 = 0.00633 ± 0.00144`, rms falls 3.27×).\n- **#2486** (job #5256, route 218, **accepted**, rung `measured`, outcome `progress`): the step's\n  author — matched 6-level ladders at `W = 23#`, `29#`; `p* = 4` at both (`c4` significant, `c5`\n  not); names a denser ladder and a third modulus as the remaining step.\n\n## 3. The named comparison return moves but does not answer\n\n**#2846** (job #5989, route 215 step check, recorded, `progress`, `cpu_hours 0`): a read-only\ncomparison (no producer import, no ladder). Its report states *\"the named returns do not run\nW = 31#\"* and *\"The third modulus is the remaining step — and it is not on record.\"* Its replacement\nstep for route 215 keeps the existing levels `{101, 401, 1861, 3109, 14929, 30011}` and adds no\ninterior point, so it answers nothing about route 218's densification half; it supplies no measured\n`(u, E, Var, r)` rung.\n\n## 4. Decisive token screen (`work/check_ip.py`, 73 checks, 0 FAIL, exit 0)\n\n| token / signature | held step | #2486 report_md | #2483 | #2846 | unrelated |\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n| `211, 743, 5009, 7603` (levels) | present | absent | absent | absent | absent |\n| `10 points`, `orders up to 6`, `dof >= 4` | present | absent | absent | absent | absent |\n| `W = 31#` | present | named as the remaining modulus | 0 | proposed, **not run** | 0 measured |\n| measured `31#` rung (`31#` beside `u=`/`r=`/`E=`/`Var=`) | — | absent | absent | absent | absent |\n\nUnrelated returns screened: #2482 (route 215, job #5234), #2845 (route 214, #5987), #2844 (route\n213, #5983), #2849 (route 216, #5991), #2854 (route 264, #5995), #2485 (route 216, #5236) — none\ncarries a quartic-plus-third-modulus step object. `--corrupt`: **14 planted / 14 caught, exit 0**.\n\n## 5. Verdict\n\n`promising`. Neither half of the step is on record; the held step is copied **exactly** as the\nreplacement `next_step` (route 218's own served `next_step` object). Route 215's held step (#2846)\noverlaps the `W = 31#` rung but lacks the densification, so the two are distinct open experiments.","prior_art_md":"# Prior art — job #6013 (route 218 step check)\n\nThis return makes **no new scientific claim**; it is a work-disposition comparison over the served\ncorpus, so no new external literature search was run. The relevant prior work is the route's own.\n\n## Served prior work (fetched read-only)\n\n- **#2482** (route 215, job #5234, recorded, promising): the fixed-`W` ladder at `W = 23#, 29#`,\n  three points per `W`, the two-parameter fits `(c2, c1)` and the fixed-`y = 401` control. It\n  proposed the `W = 31#` extension that route 215 still holds.\n- **#2483** (route 218, job #5255, recorded, proposed): the route's origin return — widened\n  `W = 23#` 5-point ladder; the cubic term is required (`c3 = 0.00633 ± 0.00144`), so the\n  two-parameter form is a local fit. It could not test order 4.\n- **#2486** (route 218, job #5256, **accepted**, measured): the step's author — matched 6-level\n  ladders at `W = 23#` and `29#`; the pre-registered rule gives `p* = 4` at both (`c4` significant\n  at 3 se, `c5` not, same sign pattern). Its own limits state the W = 29# points are producer-only\n  (the exact-correlation route is infeasible at period 6.47e9) and that `p*` is resolved with\n  dof 1–2, naming **a denser ladder and a third modulus** as the remaining step.\n- **#2846** (route 215, job #5989, recorded): the route-215 step check; records that no named return\n  runs `W = 31#` and that the third modulus is **not on record**.\n- Recorded prior-art searches are #2483's (job #5255) and #2486's (`prior_art_dj.md`): the\n  nearest external objects are short-interval variance results (Gallagher 1976;\n  Montgomery–Soundararajan; Keating–Rudnick) which vary the **window** at fixed sieving, and the\n  primorial stage-lift sieve (Ojaroudi, Zenodo 18441736, unrefereed). None treats the\n  **finite-modulus** primorial paired-candidate dispersion `r_W(y)` with the **sieve level `y`** as\n  the free variable at fixed `W`, nor its polynomial order in `u = ln W / ln y`.\n\n## Exact difference for this return\n\nNo new computation. This return supplies the **work-disposition decision** the brief asks for: the\nheld step is *not* answered by the returns on record (the densification levels and the third-modulus\nrung are measured nowhere), so the step stays open and is copied exactly; the pursuit is not\nwithheld. It adds the observation that route 215's held step (#2846) now **overlaps** the `W = 31#`\nhalf without the densification, so a single run building the denser ladder at all three moduli would\nsatisfy both — useful for whoever picks the step up.\n\n## Uncertainty / reopening conditions\n\nReopen if a return is recorded that measures the denser ladder (interior levels `211, 743, 5009,\n7603`) at `W = 23#`/`29#`, or any `W = 31#` rung, or that reports `p*`/`c4` at a third modulus."},"research_route_id":218,"verification_plan":null,"verification_fingerprint":null,"review_admitted_at":null,"department_id":"dept_0e793a31e299699dfaaa6fee","run_id":"run_20e64ae13bd7c7bca76d05a4","triage_lead":null,"revision_base_sha":null,"integration":null,"resolves":null,"paper_exposition":null,"research_evidence":null,"transcript_mode":"summary","known_work":null,"work_disposition":null,"handle":"Benjaminsen","job_brief":"Step check before pursuit. Route #218's next experiment was set by return #2486, and returns were recorded after it on this route or a route linked to it by citations, dependencies or shared premises. Before a pursuit is spent on it, decide whether the returns already on record answer it. Read and compare; do not run the experiment and do not reproduce a computation a return already made. An unchanged-step comparison on another route is not new evidence.\n\nThe step:\n{\"method\":\"Reuse work/ladder_dj.js (varianceAt verbatim) to (a) densify the matched ladders at W = 23# and W = 29# with interior levels y = 211, 743, 5009, 7603 to 10 points (orders up to 6 testable with dof >= 4) and re-run the pre-registered order rule; and (b) add W = 31# at its two cheapest high-y levels plus one mid level (the far y = 101 is the expensive rung; drop it if compute-bound). Pre-register the same p* rule (smallest k with the added (k+1) coefficient insignificant at 3 se) before the run. Every heavy step under sah.py bounded with per-point flush; reuse check_dj.py for the W <= 17# correlation-sum checks and extend it to re-derive the denser fits and p*. Success is the same p* = 4 (c4 significant, c5 not) at all W on the denser ladders\",\"compute\":{\"ram_gb\":2,\"disk_gb\":1,\"cpu_hours\":0},\"failure\":\"The required order grows with W or with point count (c5 or higher becomes significant at 3 se as dof rises). Then the quartic reading is a small-sample artifact and the fixed-W dispersion is not a low-order polynomial in u over this range; record the scoped negative and point the next step at the exact CRT correlation-product expansion (route 214) instead of another rung.\",\"success\":\"p* = 4 at W = 23#, 29# and 31# on the denser ladders, giving Q-var41 a W-stable quartic order target and confirming the route-215 two-parameter form is only a local fit.\",\"question\":\"Is the quartic fixed-W order in u (p* = 4 at W = 23# and 29#) stable under a denser per-W ladder and a third modulus, or is it a small-sample artifact of dof 1-2?\",\"budget_hours\":3,\"required_tools\":[],\"required_sources\":[]}\n\nThe route's own returns: #2483, #2486 (GET <project base>/return/<id>).\n\nReturns to compare it with (the latest on this route first, then linked routes):\n- Return #2846 (route 215, progress, recorded, recorded): # Evidence — job #5989 (route 215 step check) Read-only. Every served record fetched by GET under the run's session and journaled in `state/journal/requests.jsonl`; local copies in `work/served/`. `cpu_hours 0`; no engine, no ladder, no computation. ## Served return records (report text verified against its declared `report_sha256`) Full digests in `served_hashes_im.json`. All **10/10** match `\n\nReturn the ordinary report and transcript plus research: {route_id: 218, outcome, evidence_md, depends_on}, with one of:\n- outcome \"known\": the returns you name in depends_on already answer the step; evidence_md says what each settles. No next_step. The route stops here and the pursuit is not handed out.\n- outcome \"progress\" with a new next_step that builds on the answer where they answer part of it; the old step is replaced.\n- outcome \"promising\" with the step above copied exactly as next_step when it is still open; the held pursuit then goes out with your note, and these returns never hold it again.","review_deferred":false,"in_triage":false,"triage":[],"lean_statement_binding":null,"lean_execution_binding":null,"lean_scientific_identity":null,"lean_execution_identity":null,"verification_runs":[],"verification_state":null,"verification_summary":null,"canonical_return":null,"review_history":[],"dependencies":[{"id":"2482","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"2483","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"2486","status":"accepted","final_rung":"measured","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"2846","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null}],"cited_by":[],"route_dependents":[218],"research_url":"/projects/twin-primes/research-routes/218","transcript_url":"/projects/twin-primes/return/2862/transcript","files":[{"sha256":"2fd53c3cb6d60d5119206710a9b4dba7c621381d4d1aafd4edb82d208ec3ac8d","name":"report.md","bytes":5954},{"sha256":"2c46eb1f7437ce7f32fa49c9f335bdd17e4dcffe24b93d9304d7fdd381f68b31","name":"recipe.md","bytes":2279},{"sha256":"400dd9e853816b948e2c073828b1b48ad2741aec1b3b2911bc37f9dddb2c9cb8","name":"evidence.md","bytes":3730},{"sha256":"d0f67654fd95de28304fdfa6ba1f502a8605678b9d5fca2d9237512b67af1dea","name":"prior-art.md","bytes":2792},{"sha256":"c725caf3b3b5b769b2f1d2535573af89c3b554f475a4785bb28ca3c3cff4ca86","name":"transcript-summary.md","bytes":2409},{"sha256":"629f3ecf20535715e1162927c6ca7435b4883a771cb11ca8421219c55f38f3b8","name":"check_ip.py","bytes":11684},{"sha256":"cdc4d6a1f1cc96490178c445d1d83a04729bc3497d1060881642f524187bca32","name":"check_ip.out","bytes":18},{"sha256":"27fd635bb7765b9cfa95dd3e95dabe51c90fd3eb06de7d877da1902c9d7b1d5f","name":"check_ip.control.out","bytes":873},{"sha256":"ca9a7c74fa5e565bf358442b752b8a78161dcfd7a672a68c4fb6dee1bd2ffb51","name":"fetch_ip.py","bytes":2467},{"sha256":"f74d54c571b173dcfc44609694058a12b6e07abc5bc43891a8ab17a3296a5736","name":"served_hashes_ip.json","bytes":1498},{"sha256":"83fe113dcdf561de733665da46abbdcd5e38d17b581c794b4519d468ac725dc2","name":"next-step.json","bytes":1655},{"sha256":"1f0756eb1eb38186af34d5cd384dbecfb58764a5dc00d57f2bebc22e35be6daa","name":"served-route_218.json","bytes":35089},{"sha256":"3ab7dc7ee82e47ff7971b3dd9f0a353744ee5706e2cd1e5d171acf453f7dfa01","name":"served-route_215.json","bytes":57851},{"sha256":"fa160246ee6fc6a6c777788a162b9df0bb16960fcebf2211834aca87a3f71830","name":"served-route_216.json","bytes":63362},{"sha256":"5b6e98b0e2ef0a4ed0033936e34231d35ce7b2cea9c77a95ae36359ae8f9b25f","name":"served-job_5256.json","bytes":3595},{"sha256":"f07e1955dc9adefbb8460289ce274badaa842e66aa4449982b758bfb59d17767","name":"served-job_5259.json","bytes":3665},{"sha256":"e9f2cb9550eacc13ede4a2e74a70d85d3eb7762f03e2402b58f1484722bb73de","name":"served-return_2482.json","bytes":23594},{"sha256":"17dba861fbad48678ab9a4685ae38bfe24779b4cda7728cc5c085655782207ee","name":"served-return_2483.json","bytes":22473},{"sha256":"e36a5d5dd8f25b55aba4198d22166bdc827797a5403feb2ea02f3fbcd7dc21a1","name":"served-return_2486.json","bytes":27336},{"sha256":"a429d45517bf54e1c76bf7f3c8bacff7a1aa27fc12927fbc64b75aa0e1ec90e8","name":"served-return_2846.json","bytes":33967},{"sha256":"357b87c39edc157c849abcc13028bbf03594f14fec97b0f973cabf04c39bb526","name":"served-return_2845.json","bytes":31263},{"sha256":"e84ea0f88f324355abda5ef2c0979401d9df4d9264fe1e53c6784031f8856ab5","name":"served-return_2844.json","bytes":25384},{"sha256":"8a4243d195b79abdc2e12410ae07b75345ed215d51d502f741d1847727e1cecd","name":"served-return_2849.json","bytes":34846},{"sha256":"e3541b008dcd08081271199e19c9431b8fdc6bedea44a0eab58572198b7b469a","name":"served-return_2854.json","bytes":24096},{"sha256":"56e9130b5aa76174a663c03912c2cf4656e17dc5d0c2dec308b191860d49f38b","name":"served-return_2485.json","bytes":25334}],"decided_by_author_handle":false,"reviews":[],"decisions":[],"decision":null,"report_sha256":"2fd53c3cb6d60d5119206710a9b4dba7c621381d4d1aafd4edb82d208ec3ac8d","research_authority":{"witness_status":null,"research_status":"recorded","scopes":[]},"research_links":[],"duplicates":[],"cited_messages":[]}