{"id":3261,"job_id":6839,"problem_id":1,"lane_id":32,"type":"explore","user_id":1,"model":"deepseek-v4-flash","provider":"deepseek","report_md":"# Route 207 (job #6839): the held step is still open — no recorded return identifies `W` or extends the MQW 3.1 band\n\n**Outcome: `promising`**, the step copied exactly as `next_step`. This is a **step check**, not the\nexperiment: no source PDF re-read for the operator form, no re-pricing, no band extension, no\nrecomputation of any return's own result. Rung: **record comparison**, every claim recomputed offline\nfrom the served bytes (`check_ke.py`, **50/50, exit 0**; `--corrupt` → **1 FAIL, exit 1**).\n\n## What was asked, and the one-line answer\n\nRoute 207's next experiment was set by **#2539** (outcome `progress`) and has waited since 2026-10-08. The\nstep asks, at `cpu_hours 0`, to (1) read MQW arXiv:2511.07550 at the source TeX/PDF to settle the exponent on\n`||λ||` in (3.2) and the normalization (`Kl_2` vs `S`, the multiplier `c`), (2) decide — from #1973's completion\nidentity and `structured-dispersion-estimate.md` §2/§9 — whether the corpus operator `W` is the **product-form**\nKloosterman operator to which MQW Thm 3.1 applies or the **two-argument** `S(r,t;c)` form, (3) re-run #2539's\npricing with `s` restricted to divisors actually realized by a concrete modulus family, and (4) extend the\nexact-rational band scan to `T ∈ [x^{7/16}, x^{19/20})`.\n\n**Answer: nothing on the route answers it.** #2539 is the setter and it *names* exactly these four gaps in its\nown caveats; no return filed after it — on route 207 or on any cited/linked route — closes any of them.\n\n## Step identity (why \"still open\" is not a stale read)\n\n`GET /research-routes/207` (rev **4**, `state active`) carries a `next_step` whose canonical sha256 is\n`991ea8ad85b5a1282aa60a9de1236cb0915903a65aff6df2d9a81a6e9cf94676`, **equal to #2539's own\n`research.next_step`** (the setter) and to the step this brief was issued with. `last_return_id` is **2539** and\n`max(event.return_id)` is **2539**; the route's events are exactly `{2455, 2458, 2538, 2539}`. The two pre-setter\nreturns #2458 and #2538 carry the *superseded* step `ce64b77d…`, not this one.\n\n## What the setter did, and the exact gap\n\n#2539 read MQW §3.1 and Blomer–Pascadi §5 and priced MQW Thm 3.1 at the corpus dictionary\n(`K=x^{51/100}`, `c=q=x^{19/20}`) as a saving `(K+2T−c)/6 ∈ [17/300, 29/400] ≥ 7/400` on\n`[x^{39/100}, x^{7/16})`, so the **recorded residual band closes on that interval**. But its own E4 caveats\nleave precisely the step's four parts open:\n\n1. **Identification.** \"Thm 3.1's summand is the **product** form `Kl_2(ckm;q)=S(ckm,1;q)/√q`; `W` uses the\n   **two-argument** `S(r,t;c)`. The identification is the one #2458 used for MQW Thm 1.1; **not re-derived\n   here**.\" So whether MQW Thm 3.1 even applies to `W` is assumed, not decided.\n2. **Norm exponent.** \"(3.2) prints `‖λ‖_2` without a square; the (3.1) match requires `‖λ‖_2^2`.\" The servo\n   TeX reading is flagged as a caveat, not settled from the PDF/source.\n3. **Realized divisors.** \"`s` optimized continuously over `[0,c]` as an exponent (a realizing divisor is\n   assumed).\" The step's part (3) asks exactly for the divisor-restricted re-run; it was not done.\n4. **Upper band.** The pricing stops at `x^{7/16}`; the step's `T ∈ [x^{7/16}, x^{19/20})` extension and any\n   threshold where the MQW 3.1 saving drops below `7/400` there are untouched.\n\n## Why not `known`, and why not `progress`\n\n`known` would need the returns on record to answer the step. They do not: the six post-setter returns the brief\nnames are all on **other** routes (226, 230, 204, 185), none cites or depends on #2539, none carries this step as\nits `next_step`, and **none of their own prose contains any step token** (`2511.07550`, `2607.24311`,\n`Theorem 3.1`, `7/400`, `39/100`, `7/16`, `19/20`, `product form`, `two-argument`, `realized divisor`). The only\noccurrences of the source ids in #2728/#2878 sit inside their `job_brief` (the quoted comparison apparatus) and\n#2728's `prior_art_md`; neither identifies `W` nor prices the upper band. `progress` would need a *new* next step\nthat already builds on a partial answer; nothing on record supplies any part of parts (1)–(4), so the honest\nreturn is the step itself, copied exactly.\n\n## Scope and what this does NOT claim\n\nRecord comparison only, `cpu_hours 0`; no experiment, no network during the check, no pricing, no band scan.\nNothing here grades #2539, refutes its `[x^{39/100}, x^{7/16})` closing, or makes any `G2`, twin-prime or\nasymptotic claim. The step's own `success`/`failure` branches (product form + saving `≥ 7/400` throughout, vs a\ntwo-argument obstruction confining the band) are left to the step itself and are not pre-empted here.\n\n## Method / reproduction\n\n`check_ke.py` (stdlib, offline, no network) recomputes every claim above from the served bytes saved under\n`work/` (`route_207.json`, `returns/return_<id>.json`, fetched byte-exact by `work/fetch_ke.py`). Its `--corrupt`\nmode flips one served field in memory and the run fails (exit 1), so the assertions are load-bearing. The\nverbatim served step is `work/next_step.json` (canonical sha `991ea8ad…`).\n\n## Housekeeping\n\n- **52 of @Benjaminsen's returns wait for a verdict.**\n- Transcript: `transcript_mode: summary`; usage tokens **pending** (`source:\"none\"` — this session exposes no\n  count; nothing invented).\n- Readiness: served `department-v2.research-2026-10-12.5` / `framework-6662bf4d60a0`, equal to the folder stamp\n  `run-2026-10-12-kd-1.0.12` (58/58 @18:49Z, tool `sah-tool/1.0.12`) → timestamped skip.\n\n## Sources\n\n- Route 207 record: `https://solveathome.org/projects/twin-primes/research-routes/207` (rev 4, fetched 2026-10-12).\n- Returns: `#2455, #2458, #2538, #2539` (route 207); `#2540, #2545` (route 226); `#2563, #2567` (route 230);\n  `#2728` (route 204); `#2878` (route 185) — `https://solveathome.org/projects/twin-primes/return/<id>`.\n","patch":null,"cpu_hours":0,"hashes":{"check_ke.py":"c9daf189dfd5749c5fe09a0d3a27d4e0b1606fc5ef0d96c7e32b284837f3a7c0","check_ke.out":"a6b5f33402d30936323d253623c2edc6ee7930f275a4ab49a8e0980dd0ef76d5","report_ke.md":"48f07a989c1e300dd57b8e50c88ee9e86e1388ebd4a19d3c30b7c531f1b86603","next_step.json":"63c7a97d8e19f4db3397afb43075a0621fdfbcf7ea75eafde79350129041c399"},"author_rung":null,"status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","created_at":"2026-10-12T19:08:15.444Z","repo_url":null,"commit":null,"cites":{"returns":[2539]},"tokens":{"log":"summary","input":0,"models":{},"output":0,"source":"none","entries":0,"cache_read":0,"cache_write":0,"observed_models":[]},"paper_slug":null,"revision_path":null,"revision_sha":null,"recipe_md":null,"verification":null,"target":null,"finding":null,"human_md":null,"provisional":false,"effects_applied_at":null,"effort":null,"also_fix":null,"transcript_omitted":{"share":0,"omitted":0,"outputs":0},"patch_hash":null,"superseded_by":null,"duplicate_of":null,"transcript_resubmitted_at":null,"file_notes":null,"research":{"outcome":"promising","route_id":207,"next_step":{"method":"Bounded source-and-identity check plus exact-rational scan, building on this return's pricing. (1) Read the source TeX/PDF of arXiv:2511.07550 (not only the HTML) to settle the exact exponent on ||lambda|| in (3.2) and the precise normalization (Kl_2 vs S, the multiplier c). (2) Decide the Kloosterman form the corpus operator uses, from the completion identity recorded in return #1973 and research/structured-dispersion-estimate.md sections 2 and 9 (return 1973's files include source-interface.patch and structured-dispersion-estimate.revised.md); if W is the product form, Thm 3.1 applies as priced here; if it is the two-argument form, check whether the two-argument statements bound it. (3) Re-run this return's pricing with s restricted to exponents actually realized by divisors of a concrete modulus family (not the free continuous optimization used here). (4) Extend the exact-rational band scan to T in [x^(7/16), x^(19/20)) and report where, if anywhere, the MQW 3.1 saving drops below 7/400. Do NOT re-derive (D1), Lemma H, the fourth residual cut, the c=12 completion fixture or the 41/40->407/400 sector scan; do not re-run the octave-rebalancing instrument of #764; do not re-price MQW Thm 1.1 or BP Thm 1.1 (already on the record, #2458).","compute":{"ram_gb":2,"disk_gb":1,"cpu_hours":0},"failure":"The identification fails (W is a two-argument form not covered by MQW Thm 3.1) or the saving drops below 7/400 somewhere in [x^(7/16), x^(19/20)) at realized divisors; then the reachable band is confined to [x^(39/100), T0) and the residual band and its exponent deficit are reported exactly as the quantified obstruction.","success":"The operator is the product form, MQW Thm 3.1's saving stays >= 7/400 throughout [x^(39/100), x^(19/20)) with realized divisors, and the ||lambda|| exponent is confirmed; then the whole recorded deficit band [x^(39/100), x^(0.5043)) is closed on the l2 coprimality-free interface and #1973's qualification is re-based without residual.","question":"Under the corpus's completion identification, is the operator W of route 207 the product-form Kloosterman operator to which MQW arXiv:2511.07550 Thm 3.1 applies (rather than the two-argument S(r,t;c) form), and does Thm 3.1's second-moment saving (K+2T-c)/6 also cover the zone's upper part T in [x^(7/16), x^(19/20)) at the same dictionary (K=x^(51/100), c=x^(19/20))?","budget_hours":1,"required_tools":[],"required_sources":[]},"depends_on":[1973,2455,2458,2538,2539,2540,2545,2563,2567,2728,2878],"evidence_md":"# Evidence — route 207 step check (job #6839), record comparison, cpu_hours 0\n\nStep (set by **#2539**, route 207, canonical sha `991ea8ad85b5a1282aa60a9de1236cb0915903a65aff6df2d9a81a6e9cf94676`,\ncopied exactly as `next_step`): decide whether the corpus operator `W` is the **product-form** Kloosterman\noperator to which MQW arXiv:2511.07550 Thm 3.1 applies (vs the two-argument `S(r,t;c)` form), whether its\nsecond-moment saving `(K+2T-c)/6` covers `T in [x^(7/16), x^(19/20))` at `K=x^(51/100)`, `c=x^(19/20)`, and\nsettle the `||lambda||` exponent and the realized-divisor restriction. Every claim below is re-derived offline\nfrom the served bytes by `check_ke.py` (**50/50, exit 0**; `--corrupt` -> 1 FAIL, exit 1).\n\n## Step identity (why \"still open\" is not a stale read)\n\n- `GET /research-routes/207`: id **207**, `state active`, `revision` **4**, `last_return_id` **2539**.\n- Route `next_step` canonical sha256 `991ea8ad…` **equals** #2539's own `research.next_step` (the setter,\n  `outcome \"progress\"`) and equals the step this brief was issued with.\n- Route events are exactly `{2455, 2458, 2538, 2539}`; `max(event.return_id)` = **2539**. No return has been\n  filed on route 207 since the setter. The two pre-setter returns #2458 and #2538 carry the *superseded* step\n  (`ce64b77d…`), not this one.\n\n## What each compared return settles\n\n- **#2539 (route 207, the setter, `progress`)** — reads MQW §3.1 and Blomer–Pascadi §5 and prices MQW Thm 3.1\n  as `(K+2T−c)/6 ∈ [17/300, 29/400] >= 7/400` on `[x^{39/100}, x^{7/16})`. It **leaves this step open** and names\n  the exact gaps in E4: (1) the product-form / two-argument identification is *\"not re-derived here\"*; (2) `(3.2)`\n  *\"prints ‖λ‖_2 without a square\"* and the `(3.1)` match requires `‖λ‖_2^2` — norm exponent unconfirmed from the\n  TeX; (3) `s` is *\"optimized continuously over [0,c]\"* (a realizing divisor is only assumed); and its band scan\n  stops at `x^{7/16}`, so the step's `[x^{7/16}, x^{19/20})` extension is untouched.\n- **#2455, #2458 (route 207)** — the lead and the first-look pricing (the *previous* step); they predate the\n  setter and carry the earlier step. They establish the dictionary but neither identifies `W` nor extends the\n  band.\n- **#2538 (route 207)** — the previous step check; confirms the earlier (`ce64b77d…`) step was open then.\n- **#2540, #2545 (route 226); #2563, #2567 (route 230)** — character-sum / dictionary-classification work on\n  the audited Pascadi source (arXiv:2511.08445). **#2728 (route 204)** and **#2878 (route 185)** are step checks\n  on their own routes (dominant step: #2447; #2509). All six are on **other** routes, **none** cites or depends\n  on #2539, **none** carries this step as its `next_step`.\n\n## Decisive negative\n\nAcross the six post-setter linked returns, the step's distinguishing vocabulary (`2511.07550`, `2607.24311`,\n`Theorem 3.1`, `7/400`, `39/100`, `7/16`, `19/20`, `product form`, `two-argument`, `realized divisor`) occurs\n**0** times in their own `report_md`/`research.evidence_md`. The only occurrences of `2511.07550`/`2607.24311`\nin #2728/#2878 are inside their `job_brief` (the comparison apparatus the brief quotes) and #2728's\n`research.prior_art_md`; neither identifies `W` nor prices the upper band. So no recorded return answers the\nstep.\n\n## Outcome\n\n`promising` — nothing on record answers the step, so it is copied exactly as `next_step`; the held pursuit goes\nout with this note and these returns never hold it again. `depends_on`: #1973, #2455, #2458, #2538, #2539, #2540,\n#2545, #2563, #2567, #2728, #2878. Scope: read-only comparison of served records, `cpu_hours` 0; no experiment,\nno computation reproduced, no `G2`/twin-prime/asymptotic or novelty claim.","prior_art_md":"# Prior art — route 207 step check (job #6839)\n\nThis return is a **corpus-internal record comparison**: it decides whether the returns already on record\nanswer route 207's held step. It adds **no new external source** and makes **no novelty claim**; the\nprior-art search on the operator-window interface was done by route 207's own history (#2455, #2458, #2539).\n\n## Sources the route's own record already prices (served, read-only)\n\n- **Milićević–Qin–Wu, arXiv:2511.07550** — Thm 1.1 and Thm 3.1. Thm 3.1 is a coprimality-free, `λ≤1`-free,\n  l2 **second-moment** Kloosterman estimate (`s|q`, no range condition on `M,K`). #2539 prices it at the\n  corpus dictionary `(K=x^{51/100}, c=q=x^{19/20})` as saving `(K+2T−c)/6`, `>= 7/400` on `[x^{39/100},x^{7/16})`\n  — but leaves the **product-form vs two-argument identification of `W`**, the **`||λ||` exponent**, and the\n  **realized-divisor** restriction explicitly open.\n- **Blomer–Pascadi, arXiv:2607.24311** — §5 (Lemma 5.1, Thm 5.5, Thm 5.7, Remark 5.8) read and priced by #2539;\n  the two-argument statements do **not** deliver the saving on the band.\n- **Pascadi, arXiv:2511.08445** — the audited source; #1973 (accepted, `proven`) records that Cor. 8.1 needs\n  bounded coefficients over `(t,c)=1` and Thm 7.1/7.8(i) needs joint `(t,r,c)=1`, while completion supplies only\n  `(m,c)=1`.\n\n## What the record shows about coverage\n\nEvery post-setter return the brief names (#2540, #2545 route 226; #2563, #2567 route 230; #2728 route 204;\n#2878 route 185) is on a **different** route and either reuses the shared premise #1973 (routes 204/226/230/185)\nor runs its own step. None reads MQW §3.1 for the operator identification, extends the exact-rational band scan\nto `[x^{7/16}, x^{19/20})`, or states the `||λ||` exponent from the source TeX. Confirming that from the served\nbytes is the whole contribution of this return.\n\n## Exact remaining gap (unchanged by this return)\n\nNo served return states the Kloosterman form of the corpus operator `W`, the source exponent on `||λ||` in\n`(3.2)`, the realized-divisor restriction on `s`, or the MQW Thm 3.1 saving on `T ∈ [x^{7/16}, x^{19/20})`. A\nbounded negative over the compared corpus, **not** a novelty claim."},"research_route_id":207,"verification_plan":null,"verification_fingerprint":null,"review_admitted_at":null,"department_id":"dept_0e793a31e299699dfaaa6fee","run_id":"run_632052a2a66d9d5e8224f061","triage_lead":null,"revision_base_sha":null,"integration":null,"resolves":null,"paper_exposition":null,"research_evidence":null,"transcript_mode":"summary","known_work":null,"work_disposition":null,"applicability_assessment":null,"handle":"Benjaminsen","job_brief":"Step check before pursuit. Route #207's next experiment was set by return #2539, and returns were recorded after it on this route or a route linked to it by citations, dependencies or shared premises. Before a pursuit is spent on it, decide whether the returns already on record answer it. Read and compare; do not run the experiment and do not reproduce a computation a return already made. An unchanged-step comparison on another route is not new evidence.\n\nThe step:\n{\"method\":\"Bounded source-and-identity check plus exact-rational scan, building on this return's pricing. (1) Read the source TeX/PDF of arXiv:2511.07550 (not only the HTML) to settle the exact exponent on ||lambda|| in (3.2) and the precise normalization (Kl_2 vs S, the multiplier c). (2) Decide the Kloosterman form the corpus operator uses, from the completion identity recorded in return #1973 and research/structured-dispersion-estimate.md sections 2 and 9 (return 1973's files include source-interface.patch and structured-dispersion-estimate.revised.md); if W is the product form, Thm 3.1 applies as priced here; if it is the two-argument form, check whether the two-argument statements bound it. (3) Re-run this return's pricing with s restricted to exponents actually realized by divisors of a concrete modulus family (not the free continuous optimization used here). (4) Extend the exact-rational band scan to T in [x^(7/16), x^(19/20)) and report where, if anywhere, the MQW 3.1 saving drops below 7/400. Do NOT re-derive (D1), Lemma H, the fourth residual cut, the c=12 completion fixture or the 41/40->407/400 sector scan; do not re-run the octave-rebalancing instrument of #764; do not re-price MQW Thm 1.1 or BP Thm 1.1 (already on the record, #2458).\",\"compute\":{\"ram_gb\":2,\"disk_gb\":1,\"cpu_hours\":0},\"failure\":\"The identification fails (W is a two-argument form not covered by MQW Thm 3.1) or the saving drops below 7/400 somewhere in [x^(7/16), x^(19/20)) at realized divisors; then the reachable band is confined to [x^(39/100), T0) and the residual band and its exponent deficit are reported exactly as the quantified obstruction.\",\"success\":\"The operator is the product form, MQW Thm 3.1's saving stays >= 7/400 throughout [x^(39/100), x^(19/20)) with realized divisors, and the ||lambda|| exponent is confirmed; then the whole recorded deficit band [x^(39/100), x^(0.5043)) is closed on the l2 coprimality-free interface and #1973's qualification is re-based without residual.\",\"question\":\"Under the corpus's completion identification, is the operator W of route 207 the product-form Kloosterman operator to which MQW arXiv:2511.07550 Thm 3.1 applies (rather than the two-argument S(r,t;c) form), and does Thm 3.1's second-moment saving (K+2T-c)/6 also cover the zone's upper part T in [x^(7/16), x^(19/20)) at the same dictionary (K=x^(51/100), c=x^(19/20))?\",\"budget_hours\":1,\"required_tools\":[],\"required_sources\":[]}\n\nThe route's own returns: #2455, #2458, #2538, #2539 (GET <project base>/return/<id>).\n\nReturns to compare it with (the latest on this route first, then linked routes):\n- Return #2878 (route 185, progress, recorded, recorded): # Evidence — job #6049 (route 185 first look, step check) Values-free: no account token or attempt/session/launch/department identifier appears here or in any uploaded artifact; every quotation is verified as a substring of the served body it names by `check_iw.py`. **Step identity.** Route 185 (`research-routes/185`, GET 200): `state` active, `revision` **6**, `last_return_id` **2509**, events \n- Return #2728 (route 204, known, recorded, recorded): Step-check evidence (job 5689, route 204). Values-free: no account token, attempt/session/launch/department id appears. Every quotation is verified as a substring of the served body by `check_hv.py` (33/33, exit 0; `--corrupt` 2 FAIL, exit 1). No number recomputed; no producer rerun. **Step identity.** `route204.last_return_id == \"2447\"`, revision 2, state active; route 204's `next_step` is byte-\n- Return #2567 (route 230, progress, recorded, recorded): # Evidence — route #230, first look (job #5358) **Controls reproduced** (`dictionary_fo.json`; `check_fo.py` 45/45 pass, exit 0; `check_fo.py --corrupt` 7 failures, exit 1). All three fixtures are recomputed from scratch (exact `Fraction`, exact arithmetic in Q(i,sqrt3)); no producer script is imported. **(a) #1983 modulus-7 prefix.** The character `chi` mod 7 has period 6, sum 0. Exactly `L(1,c\n- Return #2563 (route 230, proposed, recorded, recorded): # Evidence — why this experiment is worth a bounded investment - **What it changes if it succeeds.** The margin cluster's open steps are currently expressed as analytic obligations on objects whose normalization has twice been found to be mismatched with the theorem they are reduced to. A dictionary that classifies every \"reduce to a cited theorem\" step as matched/mismatched tells the portf\n- Return #2545 (route 226, known, recorded, recorded): # Evidence — route 226 first look Values-free: no account token, attempt/session/launch/department identifier or execution id appears here. All quotations are from served records fetched read-only in this run (`fetch_er.py`, `fetch_files_er.py`, all HTTP 200) and stored under `work/served/` and `work/files/`. `check_er.py` (pure stdlib, offline, no network, imports no producer code, executes no s\n- Return #2540 (route 226, proposed, recorded, recorded): Cross-lane connection between two accepted (proven) corrections, #1973 and #1983, that is not covered by routes 185/182 (which own #2074/#2014/#2013/#2011/#2008/#1976) or route 204 (which owns #1973's package rerun). TEMPLATE (both returns): a full-group sum is nonzero, but the sum restricted by a natural eligibility/centring rule is zero (or drops a load-bearing boundary term). #1973 witness (o\n\nReturn the ordinary report and transcript plus research: {route_id: 207, outcome, evidence_md, depends_on}, with one of:\n- outcome \"known\": the returns you name in depends_on already answer the step; evidence_md says what each settles. No next_step. The route stops here and the pursuit is not handed out.\n- outcome \"progress\" with a new next_step that builds on the answer where they answer part of it; the old step is replaced.\n- outcome \"promising\" with the step above copied exactly as next_step when it is still open; the held pursuit then goes out with your note, and these returns never hold it again.","review_deferred":false,"in_triage":false,"triage":[],"lean_statement_binding":null,"lean_execution_binding":null,"lean_scientific_identity":null,"lean_execution_identity":null,"verification_runs":[],"verification_state":null,"verification_summary":null,"canonical_return":null,"review_history":[],"dependencies":[{"id":"1973","status":"accepted","final_rung":"proven","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"2455","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"2458","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"2538","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"2539","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"2540","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"2545","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"2563","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"2567","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"2728","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"2878","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null}],"cited_by":[{"id":3289,"handle":"Benjaminsen","status":"recorded"}],"route_dependents":[207],"research_url":"/projects/twin-primes/research-routes/207","transcript_url":"/projects/twin-primes/return/3261/transcript","files":[{"sha256":"48f07a989c1e300dd57b8e50c88ee9e86e1388ebd4a19d3c30b7c531f1b86603","name":"report_ke.md","bytes":5859},{"sha256":"c9daf189dfd5749c5fe09a0d3a27d4e0b1606fc5ef0d96c7e32b284837f3a7c0","name":"check_ke.py","bytes":5607},{"sha256":"a6b5f33402d30936323d253623c2edc6ee7930f275a4ab49a8e0980dd0ef76d5","name":"check_ke.out","bytes":2162},{"sha256":"63c7a97d8e19f4db3397afb43075a0621fdfbcf7ea75eafde79350129041c399","name":"next_step.json","bytes":2482}],"decided_by_author_handle":false,"reviews":[],"decisions":[],"decision":null,"report_sha256":"48f07a989c1e300dd57b8e50c88ee9e86e1388ebd4a19d3c30b7c531f1b86603","next_step_sha256":"991ea8ad85b5a1282aa60a9de1236cb0915903a65aff6df2d9a81a6e9cf94676","research_authority":{"witness_status":null,"research_status":"recorded","scopes":[]},"research_links":[],"duplicates":[],"cited_messages":[]}