{"id":3286,"job_id":6881,"problem_id":1,"lane_id":null,"type":"explore","user_id":1,"model":"claude-opus-5-5","provider":"anthropic","report_md":"# Applicability screening of return #3266 (job 6881)\n\nSource: accepted return #3266 (route 148 wider-population audit of the sahdated 1.1.5 `producers` link rule; rung verified). Report sha256 ce260d65... matches the issued snapshot. No typed scopes, so every entry has scope_keys [] and is provisional.\n\n| area | decision |\n|---|---|\n| g2-exponent | inapplicable |\n| adversarial | applicable |\n| formalize | inapplicable |\n| measure | unresolved |\n| infinitude | inapplicable |\n| finiteness-structure | inapplicable |\n| kk-lower-bound | inapplicable |\n\n## Summary\n#3266 is a finite tooling result: over 41 served files the may key adds 5 links over strict, all 5 sound; `<=20%` is MET under both readings (9.52% vs 17.46%). A constructed dead-branch fixture shows the rule is not sound in general (no reachability). Its transferable content is the validator counterexample (adversarial). Relevance to measure is a recorded gap (population sensitivity and provenance checks, but no range extension). It has no mathematical lemma (formalize) and no number-theoretic content (g2-exponent, infinitude, finiteness-structure, kk-lower-bound main and O1-O7).\n\n## What this does not do\nNo experiment, recomputation, new claim, artifact, review request or route change. Applicability is provisional until scope authority exists.\n","patch":null,"cpu_hours":0,"hashes":{},"author_rung":"heuristic","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","created_at":"2026-10-12T22:47:23.063Z","repo_url":null,"commit":null,"cites":{"returns":[3266]},"tokens":{"log":"summary","input":58,"models":{"claude-opus-5-5":14453},"output":14453,"source":"reported","entries":0,"cache_read":1353401,"cache_write":62979,"observed_models":[]},"paper_slug":null,"revision_path":null,"revision_sha":null,"recipe_md":null,"verification":null,"target":null,"finding":null,"human_md":null,"provisional":false,"effects_applied_at":null,"effort":"high","also_fix":null,"transcript_omitted":{"share":0,"omitted":0,"outputs":0},"patch_hash":null,"superseded_by":null,"duplicate_of":null,"transcript_resubmitted_at":null,"file_notes":null,"research":null,"research_route_id":null,"verification_plan":null,"verification_fingerprint":null,"review_admitted_at":null,"department_id":"dept_da55f23c995cabb5136f4e91","run_id":"run_c553297e63ac76c03785238a","triage_lead":null,"revision_base_sha":null,"integration":null,"resolves":null,"paper_exposition":null,"research_evidence":null,"transcript_mode":"summary","known_work":null,"work_disposition":null,"applicability_assessment":{"schema":"research-applicability-v1","entries":[{"decision":"inapplicable","target_id":"g2-exponent","scope_keys":[],"evidence_md":"Mismatch. #3266 'Scope' section: \"Tooling contract on route 148; **no** twin-prime or asymptotic claim.\" Its object is a static link rule between Python reader and producer sites (5 links, precision 5/5, U/D 9.52% may vs 17.46% strict over D=63 write sites). No inequality, sieve weight, G_2 bound or exponent appears, so nothing can lower the 4.27 exponent.","assumptions_md":"Provisional relevance only: #3266 has no typed research_evidence scopes (scope_keys []), so nothing here is a validated transfer. Source scope preserved: a tooling contract on route 148 (sahdated 1.1.5 `producers` link rule), finite and offline, scoped to the 41 served files of returns 1541, 1549, 1837, 2033, 2026, 2190, 2317, 2331, 2405 plus three fixtures; the report states no twin-prime or asymptotic claim and that precision 1.00 is not a soundness theorem about arbitrary code.","transfer_eligible":false,"provisional_relevance":true},{"decision":"applicable","target_id":"adversarial","scope_keys":[],"evidence_md":"Bridge. Fixture 1 of #3266 is a concrete counterexample witness against a validator rule: a reader of `shared.json` whose only producer writes inside `if False:` is still linked and mislabelled `unguarded`, because the rule \"performs **no reachability**\". The report states this \"falsifies the rule in general\" and that precision 1.00 is \"a property of the **served corpus**, not of arbitrary code\". check_kg.py also carries a load-bearing `--corrupt` control (19/19 exit 0; corrupted 18/19 exit 1). This is exactly counterexample search against validators; the source's next_step (reject literal-false-guarded producers and re-run) is the follow-up target.","assumptions_md":"Provisional relevance only: #3266 has no typed research_evidence scopes (scope_keys []), so nothing here is a validated transfer. Source scope preserved: a tooling contract on route 148 (sahdated 1.1.5 `producers` link rule), finite and offline, scoped to the 41 served files of returns 1541, 1549, 1837, 2033, 2026, 2190, 2317, 2331, 2405 plus three fixtures; the report states no twin-prime or asymptotic claim and that precision 1.00 is not a soundness theorem about arbitrary code. The witness is a constructed fixture, not a finding in served code; on the 41 files no unsound link was found.","transfer_eligible":false,"provisional_relevance":true},{"decision":"inapplicable","target_id":"formalize","scope_keys":[],"evidence_md":"Mismatch. #3266 contains no mathematical lemma to formalize in Lean 4. Its accepted content is finite counts over 41 files (5 links, D=63, U=6 vs 11) and a hand audit; the only general property in view (soundness of the link rule) is explicitly refuted by fixture 1, so there is no accepted statement to formalize.","assumptions_md":"Provisional relevance only: #3266 has no typed research_evidence scopes (scope_keys []), so nothing here is a validated transfer. Source scope preserved: a tooling contract on route 148 (sahdated 1.1.5 `producers` link rule), finite and offline, scoped to the 41 served files of returns 1541, 1549, 1837, 2033, 2026, 2190, 2317, 2331, 2405 plus three fixtures; the report states no twin-prime or asymptotic claim and that precision 1.00 is not a soundness theorem about arbitrary code. A future formal model of the repaired rule (with reachability) would be a new claim and needs ordinary review.","transfer_eligible":false,"provisional_relevance":true},{"decision":"unresolved","target_id":"measure","scope_keys":[],"evidence_md":"Partial bridge only. #3266 measures a tooling verdict over a file population, not a numbered numeric range: the wider union grew D from 20 (#2534) to 63, and the `<=20%` clause went from 25% NOT MET to 17.46% MET under strict, so the report calls the clause \"**population-sensitive** under strict\" while may is MET on both. The rule audits the dated state writes of measurement scripts (census.py:638 `write_dated`), so it bears on provenance checks for extended measurement runs. But it extends no measurement script to a larger range, and whether its precision holds on measure-lane scripts outside the 41-file corpus is the open question fixture 1 leaves.","assumptions_md":"Provisional relevance only: #3266 has no typed research_evidence scopes (scope_keys []), so nothing here is a validated transfer. Source scope preserved: a tooling contract on route 148 (sahdated 1.1.5 `producers` link rule), finite and offline, scoped to the 41 served files of returns 1541, 1549, 1837, 2033, 2026, 2190, 2317, 2331, 2405 plus three fixtures; the report states no twin-prime or asymptotic claim and that precision 1.00 is not a soundness theorem about arbitrary code. Recorded gap: transfer to measure-lane scripts outside the corpus needs the reachability repair and ordinary review; no experiment is requested here.","transfer_eligible":false,"provisional_relevance":true},{"decision":"inapplicable","target_id":"infinitude","scope_keys":[],"evidence_md":"Mismatch. #3266 is a static-analysis audit of served Python files on route 148 and states no twin-prime or asymptotic claim. It proposes no route (\"No route proposed\") and has no implication for infinitude.","assumptions_md":"Provisional relevance only: #3266 has no typed research_evidence scopes (scope_keys []), so nothing here is a validated transfer. Source scope preserved: a tooling contract on route 148 (sahdated 1.1.5 `producers` link rule), finite and offline, scoped to the 41 served files of returns 1541, 1549, 1837, 2033, 2026, 2190, 2317, 2331, 2405 plus three fixtures; the report states no twin-prime or asymptotic claim and that precision 1.00 is not a soundness theorem about arbitrary code.","transfer_eligible":false,"provisional_relevance":true},{"decision":"inapplicable","target_id":"finiteness-structure","scope_keys":[],"evidence_md":"Mismatch. Nothing in #3266 assumes a finite twin count or derives structure from one. Its quantities are link counts and unresolved-site shares in a code corpus; there is no conditional \"if finitely many twins then ...\" statement.","assumptions_md":"Provisional relevance only: #3266 has no typed research_evidence scopes (scope_keys []), so nothing here is a validated transfer. Source scope preserved: a tooling contract on route 148 (sahdated 1.1.5 `producers` link rule), finite and offline, scoped to the 41 served files of returns 1541, 1549, 1837, 2033, 2026, 2190, 2317, 2331, 2405 plus three fixtures; the report states no twin-prime or asymptotic claim and that precision 1.00 is not a soundness theorem about arbitrary code.","transfer_eligible":false,"provisional_relevance":true},{"decision":"inapplicable","target_id":"kk-lower-bound","scope_keys":[],"evidence_md":"Mismatch for main and O1-O7. main (survivor-gap lower bound, A=12) and O3 (fixed A > 4): no survivor gaps or A parameter. O1 (prime harmonic asymptotic), O2 (uniform smooth-number asymptotic), O4 (dyadic prime count), O6 (two-sided density/Euler): no number-theoretic quantity at all. O5 (general sieve input; finite dimension-4, CRT, covering): no sieve content. O7 (constant in eq. (28)): no constant or parameter range. #3266 is a tooling audit with \"no twin-prime or asymptotic claim\".","assumptions_md":"Provisional relevance only: #3266 has no typed research_evidence scopes (scope_keys []), so nothing here is a validated transfer. Source scope preserved: a tooling contract on route 148 (sahdated 1.1.5 `producers` link rule), finite and offline, scoped to the 41 served files of returns 1541, 1549, 1837, 2033, 2026, 2190, 2317, 2331, 2405 plus three fixtures; the report states no twin-prime or asymptotic claim and that precision 1.00 is not a soundness theorem about arbitrary code.","transfer_eligible":false,"provisional_relevance":true}],"targets":[{"id":"g2-exponent","lane":"g2-exponent","title":"Lower the G₂ upper-bound exponent (4.27 toward 2)","domain_md":"Lower the G₂ upper-bound exponent (4.27 toward 2). Preserve the source theorem, assumptions, quantifiers, computational coverage and exact artifacts; assess relevance without extending its accepted scope.","topic_ids":[]},{"id":"adversarial","lane":"adversarial","title":"Break accepted lemmas: counterexample search against validators","domain_md":"Break accepted lemmas: counterexample search against validators. Preserve the source theorem, assumptions, quantifiers, computational coverage and exact artifacts; assess relevance without extending its accepted scope.","topic_ids":[]},{"id":"formalize","lane":"formalize","title":"Lean 4 formalization of accepted lemmas","domain_md":"Lean 4 formalization of accepted lemmas. Preserve the source theorem, assumptions, quantifiers, computational coverage and exact artifacts; assess relevance without extending its accepted scope.","topic_ids":[]},{"id":"measure","lane":"measure","title":"Extend numbered measurement scripts to larger ranges","domain_md":"Extend numbered measurement scripts to larger ranges. Preserve the source theorem, assumptions, quantifiers, computational coverage and exact artifacts; assess relevance without extending its accepted scope.","topic_ids":[]},{"id":"infinitude","lane":"infinitude","title":"Routes toward infinitude not in the refuted registry","domain_md":"Routes toward infinitude not in the refuted registry. Preserve the source theorem, assumptions, quantifiers, computational coverage and exact artifacts; assess relevance without extending its accepted scope.","topic_ids":[]},{"id":"finiteness-structure","lane":"finiteness-structure","title":"What structure a finite twin count would force (disproof-shaped lane)","domain_md":"What structure a finite twin count would force (disproof-shaped lane). Preserve the source theorem, assumptions, quantifiers, computational coverage and exact artifacts; assess relevance without extending its accepted scope.","topic_ids":[]},{"id":"kk-lower-bound","paper":"kk-lower-bound","title":"Mapped paper claims and separate obligations","domain_md":"kk-lower-bound.main: Survivor-gap lower bound, full cutoff, integers, crossing gaps, quantifiers and logarithms, sufficient A=12. This is not twin-prime infinitude. Only designated declarations and their exact assumptions are covered; O1–O7 remain separate.\nkk-lower-bound.o1: Prime harmonic asymptotic with constant and o(1) remainder; distinguish finite bounds and asymptotic equality.\nkk-lower-bound.o2: Two-variable uniform smooth-number asymptotic, including u <= Z^(1-epsilon); do not transfer a fixed-u theorem without a uniformity bridge.\nkk-lower-bound.o3: Every fixed A > 4; the accepted main proof uses sufficient A=12. The general-A extension remains separate.\nkk-lower-bound.o4: Dyadic prime-count asymptotic with coefficient 1/2; an eventual y/(3 log y) lower bound does not prove equality.\nkk-lower-bound.o5: The quoted general sieve input and external one-class statement; distinguish accepted finite dimension-4, CRT and covering results.\nkk-lower-bound.o6: Two-sided density and Euler estimates; a finite one-sided bound does not close this obligation.\nkk-lower-bound.o7: The exact constant in equation (28), with its hypotheses and parameter ranges.","topic_ids":["kk-lower-bound.main","kk-lower-bound.o1","kk-lower-bound.o2","kk-lower-bound.o3","kk-lower-bound.o4","kk-lower-bound.o5","kk-lower-bound.o6","kk-lower-bound.o7"]}],"reviewer":{"model":"claude-opus-5-5","effort":"high","handle":"Benjaminsen","trusted":true,"user_id":1,"authority_basis":"project_grant","same_contributor":true},"effective":true,"check_job_id":6881,"input_sha256":"251ee2ad2e8e75b3da0cfbf6df60b3bdbc47f9a5631cd5ca68f98c529cc595f9","source_snapshot":{"version":"research-applicability-v1","scope_hashes":[],"report_sha256":"ce260d65b20eff01bcbb97d9b2cde63a3ee47a488877fe4b15abcd4d824ddf9f","targets_sha256":"747ddcd43a71784abe2ccceb37c4a48cf8092821fa8346462db03f03b7f50a18","source_return_id":3266,"material_evidence":{"sha256":"b290a3672c043e705254f85d881d15b1ec6d40f081125098c28a7b27fb2f45ed","entries":{"return:3266":"51b5ba71bffd3b783747eb9f0a837b008dc206495128f230013b9d8e569bf2de","finding:92828":"6c45845a756d987695f289c299472d8189497aa2e2c1805d339adaee6b2bcbb0","artifact:3266:16109498c5378212daa6cb98d60ee20f819c6a3d075e0e7ceaef0cc07d242178":"16109498c5378212daa6cb98d60ee20f819c6a3d075e0e7ceaef0cc07d242178","artifact:3266:2316fe3c56a5fc168b0a0e41a259123aad9e3bd67a388dfce20a48acfec3261e":"2316fe3c56a5fc168b0a0e41a259123aad9e3bd67a388dfce20a48acfec3261e","artifact:3266:53d4769b838266929826235078fe5290834e6cfab112ec7d0d6d79417c019336":"53d4769b838266929826235078fe5290834e6cfab112ec7d0d6d79417c019336","artifact:3266:581a3718fe5e7a77f190a028f0377d5e8b3f7c8d756cf94b7a8012b6742bbbce":"581a3718fe5e7a77f190a028f0377d5e8b3f7c8d756cf94b7a8012b6742bbbce","artifact:3266:ce260d65b20eff01bcbb97d9b2cde63a3ee47a488877fe4b15abcd4d824ddf9f":"ce260d65b20eff01bcbb97d9b2cde63a3ee47a488877fe4b15abcd4d824ddf9f","artifact:3266:e08db77713822ceea6a524c2982e99472a959bad786c618f26ab1c6a334eb68b":"e08db77713822ceea6a524c2982e99472a959bad786c618f26ab1c6a334eb68b","artifact:3266:fdf026d50bc1bcfd21d8550c6a9caf5cfc1c48709a8d00f5832d07fff823ac1f":"fdf026d50bc1bcfd21d8550c6a9caf5cfc1c48709a8d00f5832d07fff823ac1f"},"version":"material-evidence-v1"},"consideration_only":true},"source_return_id":3266,"consideration_only":true,"scientific_authority":false,"provisional_relevance":true,"base_assessment_return_id":null},"handle":"Benjaminsen","job_brief":"Bounded applicability screening of accepted scientific return #3266: provisional consideration before validated transfer. This is relevance judgment, not another acceptance of the source or endorsement of unvalidated scopes. Do not run experiments, reproduce a computation or re-prove the source. No prior screening. Read the source and its current scope assessments once.\n\nSource snapshot: {\"version\":\"research-applicability-v1\",\"consideration_only\":true,\"source_return_id\":3266,\"report_sha256\":\"ce260d65b20eff01bcbb97d9b2cde63a3ee47a488877fe4b15abcd4d824ddf9f\",\"scope_hashes\":[],\"material_evidence\":{\"version\":\"material-evidence-v1\",\"entries\":{\"return:3266\":\"51b5ba71bffd3b783747eb9f0a837b008dc206495128f230013b9d8e569bf2de\",\"finding:92828\":\"6c45845a756d987695f289c299472d8189497aa2e2c1805d339adaee6b2bcbb0\",\"artifact:3266:16109498c5378212daa6cb98d60ee20f819c6a3d075e0e7ceaef0cc07d242178\":\"16109498c5378212daa6cb98d60ee20f819c6a3d075e0e7ceaef0cc07d242178\",\"artifact:3266:2316fe3c56a5fc168b0a0e41a259123aad9e3bd67a388dfce20a48acfec3261e\":\"2316fe3c56a5fc168b0a0e41a259123aad9e3bd67a388dfce20a48acfec3261e\",\"artifact:3266:53d4769b838266929826235078fe5290834e6cfab112ec7d0d6d79417c019336\":\"53d4769b838266929826235078fe5290834e6cfab112ec7d0d6d79417c019336\",\"artifact:3266:581a3718fe5e7a77f190a028f0377d5e8b3f7c8d756cf94b7a8012b6742bbbce\":\"581a3718fe5e7a77f190a028f0377d5e8b3f7c8d756cf94b7a8012b6742bbbce\",\"artifact:3266:ce260d65b20eff01bcbb97d9b2cde63a3ee47a488877fe4b15abcd4d824ddf9f\":\"ce260d65b20eff01bcbb97d9b2cde63a3ee47a488877fe4b15abcd4d824ddf9f\",\"artifact:3266:e08db77713822ceea6a524c2982e99472a959bad786c618f26ab1c6a334eb68b\":\"e08db77713822ceea6a524c2982e99472a959bad786c618f26ab1c6a334eb68b\",\"artifact:3266:fdf026d50bc1bcfd21d8550c6a9caf5cfc1c48709a8d00f5832d07fff823ac1f\":\"fdf026d50bc1bcfd21d8550c6a9caf5cfc1c48709a8d00f5832d07fff823ac1f\"},\"sha256\":\"b290a3672c043e705254f85d881d15b1ec6d40f081125098c28a7b27fb2f45ed\"},\"targets_sha256\":\"747ddcd43a71784abe2ccceb37c4a48cf8092821fa8346462db03f03b7f50a18\"}\nDeclared non-witness scopes with their existing authority: []\nConfigured areas: [{\"id\":\"g2-exponent\",\"title\":\"Lower the G₂ upper-bound exponent (4.27 toward 2)\",\"lane\":\"g2-exponent\",\"topic_ids\":[],\"domain_md\":\"Lower the G₂ upper-bound exponent (4.27 toward 2). Preserve the source theorem, assumptions, quantifiers, computational coverage and exact artifacts; assess relevance without extending its accepted scope.\"},{\"id\":\"adversarial\",\"title\":\"Break accepted lemmas: counterexample search against validators\",\"lane\":\"adversarial\",\"topic_ids\":[],\"domain_md\":\"Break accepted lemmas: counterexample search against validators. Preserve the source theorem, assumptions, quantifiers, computational coverage and exact artifacts; assess relevance without extending its accepted scope.\"},{\"id\":\"formalize\",\"title\":\"Lean 4 formalization of accepted lemmas\",\"lane\":\"formalize\",\"topic_ids\":[],\"domain_md\":\"Lean 4 formalization of accepted lemmas. Preserve the source theorem, assumptions, quantifiers, computational coverage and exact artifacts; assess relevance without extending its accepted scope.\"},{\"id\":\"measure\",\"title\":\"Extend numbered measurement scripts to larger ranges\",\"lane\":\"measure\",\"topic_ids\":[],\"domain_md\":\"Extend numbered measurement scripts to larger ranges. Preserve the source theorem, assumptions, quantifiers, computational coverage and exact artifacts; assess relevance without extending its accepted scope.\"},{\"id\":\"infinitude\",\"title\":\"Routes toward infinitude not in the refuted registry\",\"lane\":\"infinitude\",\"topic_ids\":[],\"domain_md\":\"Routes toward infinitude not in the refuted registry. Preserve the source theorem, assumptions, quantifiers, computational coverage and exact artifacts; assess relevance without extending its accepted scope.\"},{\"id\":\"finiteness-structure\",\"title\":\"What structure a finite twin count would force (disproof-shaped lane)\",\"lane\":\"finiteness-structure\",\"topic_ids\":[],\"domain_md\":\"What structure a finite twin count would force (disproof-shaped lane). Preserve the source theorem, assumptions, quantifiers, computational coverage and exact artifacts; assess relevance without extending its accepted scope.\"},{\"id\":\"kk-lower-bound\",\"title\":\"Mapped paper claims and separate obligations\",\"paper\":\"kk-lower-bound\",\"topic_ids\":[\"kk-lower-bound.main\",\"kk-lower-bound.o1\",\"kk-lower-bound.o2\",\"kk-lower-bound.o3\",\"kk-lower-bound.o4\",\"kk-lower-bound.o5\",\"kk-lower-bound.o6\",\"kk-lower-bound.o7\"],\"domain_md\":\"kk-lower-bound.main: Survivor-gap lower bound, full cutoff, integers, crossing gaps, quantifiers and logarithms, sufficient A=12. This is not twin-prime infinitude. Only designated declarations and their exact assumptions are covered; O1–O7 remain separate.\\nkk-lower-bound.o1: Prime harmonic asymptotic with constant and o(1) remainder; distinguish finite bounds and asymptotic equality.\\nkk-lower-bound.o2: Two-variable uniform smooth-number asymptotic, including u <= Z^(1-epsilon); do not transfer a fixed-u theorem without a uniformity bridge.\\nkk-lower-bound.o3: Every fixed A > 4; the accepted main proof uses sufficient A=12. The general-A extension remains separate.\\nkk-lower-bound.o4: Dyadic prime-count asymptotic with coefficient 1/2; an eventual y/(3 log y) lower bound does not prove equality.\\nkk-lower-bound.o5: The quoted general sieve input and external one-class statement; distinguish accepted finite dimension-4, CRT and covering results.\\nkk-lower-bound.o6: Two-sided density and Euler estimates; a finite one-sided bound does not close this obligation.\\nkk-lower-bound.o7: The exact constant in equation (28), with its hypotheses and parameter ranges.\"}]\n\nFor each area return applicability_assessment:{source_return_id:3266,input_sha256:\"251ee2ad2e8e75b3da0cfbf6df60b3bdbc47f9a5631cd5ca68f98c529cc595f9\",entries:[{target_id,decision:\"applicable|inapplicable|unresolved\",scope_keys:[<declared source keys; [] when the accepted report has no typed scope>],evidence_md,assumptions_md}]}. Cite source evidence and explain the possible bridge or mismatch with each area's exact domain. Missing scope authority is an unresolved validation condition, not a demand for another full review or experiment. Applicability remains provisional unless every referenced scope satisfies the existing exact scientific authority rules; only validated entries can be transferred automatically. Preserve the claim's original scope; an extension is unresolved until ordinary scientific review. An unresolved entry is a recorded gap, not an instruction for a new experiment. Submit no new scientific claims, artifacts, review request or route changes in this administrative screening. Record existing evidence even when every area is inapplicable. GET <project>/research-applicability is the live index; OUTCOMES document integration is separate.","review_deferred":false,"in_triage":false,"triage":[],"lean_statement_binding":null,"lean_execution_binding":null,"lean_scientific_identity":null,"lean_execution_identity":null,"verification_runs":[],"verification_state":null,"verification_summary":null,"canonical_return":null,"review_history":[],"dependencies":[],"cited_by":[],"route_dependents":[],"research_url":null,"transcript_url":"/projects/twin-primes/return/3286/transcript","files":[],"decided_by_author_handle":false,"reviews":[],"decisions":[],"decision":null,"report_sha256":"201aae917d2975242f8f5e0ef38264d011e420779928f3bfc458e21933224bf8","next_step_sha256":null,"research_authority":{"witness_status":null,"research_status":"recorded","scopes":[]},"research_links":[],"duplicates":[],"cited_messages":[]}