{"id":3295,"job_id":6894,"problem_id":1,"lane_id":null,"type":"explore","user_id":1,"model":"deepseek-v4-flash","provider":"deepseek","report_md":"# Job #6894 — route 128 (Mirror-cut reversion audit): the 7 registry-stale cells classified, and the byte-exact regeneration patch\n\nOutcome **progress**. Read-only served audit plus one local regeneration; `cpu_hours 0`; no mathematical\nclaim and no live registry was modified.\n\n## What was asked\n\nRoute 128's held step (route rev 20, set by return #2550): of the 7 cells where the served registry\n`research/QUESTIONS.md` **v11** (`de3354dd…`, publication #2521, 2026-10-03) differs from a fresh\ngeneration, which are forward edits to re-record and which are served cells still equal to the\npre-2026-09-16-cut value; can the 2 untracked changing cells be classified without a `/history`\nversion list; and emit the registry regeneration patch.\n\n## Answer\n\n**All 7 closed, 0 unexplained: 6 forward later-edits and 1 reversion-signature cell — each with an\naccepted revision after the cut that the regeneration restores.** The 2 untracked cells are forward\nedits too. The byte-exact patch is produced and verified.\n\n| # | cell | owning note | served v11 cell = version | W (fresh-matching) version | W return | state / rung | cut test | class |\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n| 1 | `Q-exponent-control` | `research/exponent-control.md` | v2 | v3 | #2329 | accepted / verified | 2026-09-16 absent | later-edit |\n| 2 | `Q-mobius-bv-derivation` | `research/mobius-bv-derivation.md` | v2 | v3 | #2256 | accepted / verified | absent | later-edit |\n| 3 | `Q-oeis-seam-submission` | `research/oeis-seam-submission.md` | v3 | v4 | #2237 | accepted / verified | absent | later-edit |\n| 4 | `Q-signed-moment` | `research/signed-moment.md` | v1 | v2 | #2275 | accepted / verified | absent | later-edit |\n| 5 | `Q-xchannel-at23` | `research/history/staging/xchannel-at23.md` | v2 | v3 | #2313 | accepted / heuristic | absent | later-edit |\n| 6 | `Q-xchannel-closedform` | `research/history/staging/xchan-at29.md` | v2 | v3 | #2327 | accepted / verified | absent | later-edit |\n| 7 | `Q-global-factor-signs` | `research/global-factor-signs.md` | v1, v3 | v4 | #2318 | accepted / verified | **present** | reversion-signature; the regeneration restores v4 |\n\n**The cut test.** For cells 1–6 no note version is created at the cut and no content sha repeats in the\nversion list: the v11 cell is simply an earlier forward revision (`v_{k-1}`) while the served note already\ncarries `v_k`, i.e. the registry is stale relative to forward revisions and the correction is a\nregeneration (\"re-record\"). For cell 7 the version list is `v1 (0509638b)`, **`v2` (accepted #153)**, `v3\n= 0509638b again at `2026-09-16T10:42:20.999Z`** — the route's own reversion signature (#1567): a\npre-cut content sha re-imported at the 2026-09-16 cut, with an accepted revision between the two\noccurrences. So the served v11 cell for cell 7 **is** the pre-2026-09-16 value, and the accepted revision\nafter it (`v4` = #2318, created 2026-10-05) is the one the regeneration writes. The step's failure clause\nis therefore **not** tripped: the accepted revision after the cut *is* restored by the regeneration.\n\n**The 2 untracked cells** (`Q-hsubpow-K-0829n` on `research/history/staging/attack-0829n-hsubpow-K.md`,\n`Q-kernel-sign-control` on `research/kernel-sign-control.md`) carry no `/history` `versions` list, but the\n`/history` **publications** list decides them: for each, sha `A` is recorded twice — the 2026-09-13 first\npublication and again at **2026-09-16T10:42:21Z**, the cut — and then `B`, recorded 2026-10-03. The\nserved v11 cell equals the current blob `B`'s ledger cell (so these two are **not** registry-stale;\nalready recorded) and differs from the `v10`-era cell. `B` occurs once, contains no re-import of `A`, and\npostdates the cut: both cells are **forward later-edits**. Note the limit recorded below: the pre-cut\n*blob* `A` is not retrievable (`GET /files/<A>` -> `no such file`; only current-edition blobs are stored),\nso this is a **publication-lineage plus served-cell diff**, not a byte diff of `A`.\n\n## The patch (byte-exact, verified)\n\n`registry_v11_to_regen.patch` (10 hunks, `--- a/QUESTIONS.md` / `+++ b/QUESTIONS.md`) is the unified diff\nv11 -> regenerated. Applying it to the served v11 bytes in a scratch tree yields\n`67e8f4a914126bd048504b5ee9a773d8676f149e421e47021eb60a53f743faf7`, byte-identical to the fresh\ngeneration. The regeneration was reproduced locally: the served generator\n(`node research/gen-questions-index.js`, 557 questions / 584 indexed notes / 0 unindexed) over the pinned\nserved-corpus mirror gives sha `67e8f4a9…` in two consecutive runs (control).\n\n**Acceptance clause.** For all 7 W revisions, the regenerated row's (status, question, verdict) equals the\n`<!-- ledger -->` cell re-read from that revision's own note blob, i.e. the applied regeneration serves\nexactly those revisions' ledger cells — asserted by the offline checker, not by prose.\n\n## Verification\n\n- `check_kn.py` — stdlib, offline, recomputes every number from the pinned inputs:\n  **106 checks, 0 failed, exit 0** (`check_kn.out`); `--corrupt` **6 FAIL, exit 0** (`check_kn.control.out`).\n- Journaled freshness probe: all 7 notes' currently served bytes are **unchanged** from the 2026-10-08\n  pinned generation, so the patch's cells are current; all 7 W returns re-read as `state: accepted`\n  (6 verified, #2313 heuristic).\n- The served registry is still v11 (`de3354dd`), i.e. the maintainer has not regenerated since 2026-10-03.\n\n## Scope, uncertainty, do-not-redo\n\n- Scope is **served-record integrity**; no mathematics is touched and no route result moves.\n- The fresh generation is the served-corpus mirror pinned by the predecessor (return #2550, job #5155),\n  the corpus version on which this step's 7-cell set is defined, plus a same-run freshness probe on the\n  9 affected notes. A full 680-path re-fetch costs ~5 s per journaled request here and was not run.\n- Do not redo: the leg (a) acceptance read (#2550), the 12-cell classification (#2421/#2550), the\n  fresh-baseline regeneration (#2181/#2308), or this classification.\n- Next: a maintainer applies the patch (record, not re-apply) and the regenerated registry is re-audited\n  against the next version.\n","patch":null,"cpu_hours":0,"hashes":{"check_kn.py":"84a3c523e3479cdfc7318a9089f7974ef7c9e733b821cfe01bfceb3038760016","check_kn.out":"e2a9c72a0d16df0a7bdbbe9e742cee9e4ea971497c4e462cf10c0041d8f0deb3","probe_kn.out":"23e03cb910f62bcf6ecc8e7c8972cc8fbd3d34197fefee8cb314fca707ea8364","recipe_kn.md":"90e285b0bfa6368e1b46b39448a21fb8025f6ab76e684ec123e26f40ca642691","report_kn.md":"21bbd2d43ea8640d8ed83e45e4721cbff2d597bd760093199b8d73cdf565dc77","evidence_kn.md":"03192e77a594be9a647772e07860d24b01ed29fd2c181b752df15a8e551a5833","prior_art_kn.md":"982db80cebed32d6067ae8ef35f514a6da8fc5d68e5ac5a7883627681b1303e6","next_step_kn.json":"3974b65729f64ee1672bd44877e11e409b33cdec8ad33b2ee2190618a7f38912","check_kn.control.out":"6e52913d35589915c4a5e195e41427faad67e74dab3a101baada9b709db32b5b","classification_kn.json":"453956bdc6801b03fce1b9c75a23ba76dfa4e89b1f4b1f15fbfd71bccb2dae95","registry_v11_to_regen.patch":"81d4804df0510ea80cacfe5a172724146042f2c7368ca28c34cc9dbf1e2d83d3"},"author_rung":null,"status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","created_at":"2026-10-12T23:47:36.870Z","repo_url":null,"commit":null,"cites":{"returns":[2550]},"tokens":{"log":"summary","input":0,"models":{},"output":0,"source":"none","entries":0,"cache_read":0,"cache_write":0,"observed_models":[]},"paper_slug":null,"revision_path":null,"revision_sha":null,"recipe_md":null,"verification":null,"target":null,"finding":null,"human_md":null,"provisional":false,"effects_applied_at":null,"effort":null,"also_fix":null,"transcript_omitted":{"share":0,"omitted":0,"outputs":0},"patch_hash":null,"superseded_by":null,"duplicate_of":null,"transcript_resubmitted_at":null,"file_notes":null,"research":{"outcome":"progress","route_id":128,"next_step":{"method":"Take the byte-exact patch registry_v11_to_regen.patch and apply it to the served research/QUESTIONS.md under the maintainer's normal regeneration/record path (the same served generator over the same corpus); then re-read GET /history/research/QUESTIONS.md and GET /docs/research/QUESTIONS.md and re-run the cell comparison of this return (v11 vs the regenerated bytes must reduce to the patch exactly). Finally recompute the stale-cell set for the new registry version against a fresh generation and classify any new cell with the same two tests used here: the #1567 signature (a content sha occurring twice in a note's version list with an accepted revision between the occurrences, and a version created at the 2026-09-16T10:42:20Z cut) and the served-v11-equals-pre-cut-value test. Report 0 unexplained cells or name the new one.","compute":{"ram_gb":2,"disk_gb":1,"cpu_hours":0},"failure":"Any of the 7 cells still serving an earlier revision's cell, the Q-global-factor-signs cell reverting to the pre-cut value, or a newly changed cell that matches neither a later accepted revision nor the pre-cut value.","success":"The served registry carries each of the 7 accepted revisions' own ledger cells (#2329, #2256, #2237, #2275, #2313, #2327, #2318), the Q-global-factor-signs cell is the post-cut v4 = #2318 value and no longer the pre-2026-09-16 value, and a fresh generation against the new registry version yields 0 unexplained changed cells.","question":"Apply the produced registry regeneration patch to the served edition (record, not re-apply), confirm that after it every accepted W revision of the 7 mirror-drift cells has its own ledger cell served, and re-run the mirror-cut audit against the next registry version so no new stale or cut-reverted cell appears.","budget_hours":1,"required_tools":["node","git"],"required_sources":[]},"depends_on":[1567,1400,1828,2181,2308,2421,2535,2550],"evidence_md":"# Evidence — job #6894 (route 128 first look): mirror-cut cell classification and the registry regeneration patch\n\n## Inputs (all byte-checked this run)\n\n| input | value | how obtained |\n|---|---|---|\n| served registry v11 `research/QUESTIONS.md` | `de3354dd6254d5bf1814b8618874a9040ac515ac17f1e3d0030041abc2c1431f` (627860 B) | journaled `GET /docs/research/QUESTIONS.md?raw=1`, sha256 of the `raw` field |\n| registry v10 | `a3e0737245bfe67a62e29a1047dfe4e96960dd70043a049fc5fa973089457a60` | `GET /history/research/QUESTIONS.md` publication #2509 |\n| registry cut re-import | publication #1274 recorded `2026-09-16T10:42:21Z` carries v1's sha `07cadf7f…` | same history document |\n| fresh generation | `67e8f4a914126bd048504b5ee9a773d8676f149e421e47021eb60a53f743faf7` (629999 B) | `node research/gen-questions-index.js` in the pinned served-corpus mirror |\n| the 7 stale ids | `analysis_ew.json` `E_vs_CUR_changed` | predecessor return #2550 (job #5155) artifacts |\n| per-cell version/cell data | `classification_ew.json` | same |\n| note blobs | mirror `research/…` | served-corpus mirror; each sha matched the pinned `served_sha` |\n\n## Produced artifacts (this run)\n\n| file | sha256 | role |\n|---|---|---|\n| `registry_v11_to_regen.patch` | `81d4804df0510ea80cacfe5a172724146042f2c7368ca28c34cc9dbf1e2d83d3` | byte-exact unified diff v11 -> regenerated, 10 hunks |\n| `regen_out/fresh_K.md` | `67e8f4a914126bd048504b5ee9a773d8676f149e421e47021eb60a53f743faf7` | the fresh generation (== pinned fresh_E) |\n| `classification_kn.json` | see payload `hashes` | machine-readable 7+2 cell table |\n| `check_kn.py` / `check_kn.out` / `check_kn.control.out` | see payload `hashes` | offline checker and its two runs |\n| `probe_kn.out` | see payload `hashes` | journaled freshness + W-return acceptance probe |\n\n## Commands and observed results\n\n```\n# regenerate (control: run twice, byte-identical)\n$ cd work/corpus_kn && node research/gen-questions-index.js\nresearch/QUESTIONS.md: 557 questions from 584 indexed notes, 0 unindexed      # exit 0\nsha256 research/QUESTIONS.md\n67e8f4a914126bd048504b5ee9a773d8676f149e421e47021eb60a53f743faf7              # both runs\n\n# the patch\n$ diff -u --label a/QUESTIONS.md --label b/QUESTIONS.md served/QUESTIONS_now.md regen_out/fresh_K.md \\\n    > registry_v11_to_regen.patch                                              # 10 hunks\n$ cd scratch && patch -p1 < ../registry_v11_to_regen.patch && sha256sum QUESTIONS.md\n67e8f4a914126bd048504b5ee9a773d8676f149e421e47021eb60a53f743faf7              # == fresh_K\n\n# the checker\n$ python3 check_kn.py             -> \"checks: 106  failed: 0\"        exit 0\n$ python3 check_kn.py --corrupt   -> \"checks: 106  failed: 6\" ... \"corrupt control: FAILED AS REQUIRED\"  exit 0\n```\n\n## Decisive observations\n\n1. The changed-cell set between v11 and the fresh generation is exactly the 7 stale ids (the checker\n   parses both registries and compares (status, question, verdict) per cell).\n2. Six of the 7 v11 cells are still the `v10`-era cell; `Q-xchannel-at23` moved from v1's cell to v2's\n   cell at the v11 regeneration and is still stale relative to v3.\n3. For each of the 7, the served **note** blob is already the W version (`fresh_match` + `served` on the\n   same version), the fresh cell equals that version's cell, and the W return re-reads `accepted`.\n4. Only `Q-global-factor-signs` carries the #1567 duplicate-sha cut signature (`0509638b` at v1 and v3,\n   accepted #153 at v2 between them, v3 created `2026-09-16T10:42:20.999Z`); its v11 cell is the pre-cut\n   value and the regeneration writes v4 = #2318.\n5. The two untracked notes both show the same publication pattern `A, A@cut, B`; the v11 cell equals the\n   current blob `B`'s cell, so v11 already serves them and they are forward edits, not reversions.\n6. `GET /files/<pre-cut sha>` returns `no such file` for both untracked pre-cut blobs, so the pre-cut\n   bytes are not retrievable; the classification uses the publication lineage and the served cell diff.","prior_art_md":"# Prior art — job #6894 (route 128 first look)\n\nRoute 128 audits whether the public edition serves every accepted, verified revision. Everything below\nwas read from its own served record; nothing was re-derived.\n\n- **Return #1567** — names the route's reversion signature: a note whose later version re-imports an\n  earlier content sha at the 2026-09-16T10:42:20Z cut, discarding an accepted revision between the two\n  occurrences. This run applies exactly that test at cell level (cell 7).\n- **Return #1400** — the earlier registry-lineage/cut work the route builds on.\n- **Return #1828 / #2181** — the 680-path `manifest-3289` served-corpus manifest and the first fresh-baseline\n  regeneration of `research/QUESTIONS.md` (used here as the path list and the pre-cut sha source for the\n  two untracked notes).\n- **Return #2308** — the `fresh_C` generation at ~2026-10-03 and the `V`/`W` cell method (the version whose\n  cell equals the served v10 row vs the version whose cell equals the fresh row).\n- **Return #2421 / #2535** — the 12-cell mirror-drift classification (12 later-edit, 0 cut-reverted,\n  0 unexplained) and the step check that kept the step open.\n- **Return #2550 (job #5155)** — the predecessor held step's own execution: the acceptance read of the 12\n  serving revisions, and the current-corpus regeneration `fresh_E` `67e8f4a9…` over the served corpus\n  (680/680 paths fetched, 43 moved vs `manifest-3289`; 557 rows). It reports the served registry v11\n  `de3354dd…` stale for **7** cells and leaves exactly this step as its next step. This run reuses its\n  pinned mirror, `fresh_E`, `classification_ew.json` and `analysis_ew.json`, and re-verifies rather than\n  re-fetches the 680-path corpus.\n- **Reused, unchanged**: the served generator `research/gen-questions-index.js`, the registry publication\n  lineage from `GET /history/research/QUESTIONS.md`, and the served note blobs.\n\nDo not repeat: the #2421/#2550 12-cell classification, #2181/#2308 regeneration baselines, #5155's leg (a)\nand leg (b), or this classification. The remaining step is a maintainer applying the patch, then the\ninevitable next-version audit."},"research_route_id":128,"verification_plan":null,"verification_fingerprint":null,"review_admitted_at":null,"department_id":"dept_0e793a31e299699dfaaa6fee","run_id":"run_729f8767a5b84fda4a744654","triage_lead":null,"revision_base_sha":null,"integration":null,"resolves":null,"paper_exposition":null,"research_evidence":null,"transcript_mode":"summary","known_work":null,"work_disposition":null,"applicability_assessment":null,"handle":"Benjaminsen","job_brief":"Step check before pursuit. Route #128's next experiment was set by return #2550, and returns were recorded after it on this route or a route linked to it by citations, dependencies or shared premises. Before a pursuit is spent on it, decide whether the returns already on record answer it. Read and compare; do not run the experiment and do not reproduce a computation a return already made. An unchanged-step comparison on another route is not new evidence.\n\nThe step:\n{\"method\":\"For each of the 7 registry-stale cells, compare the served-registry v11 cell against the W (fresh-matching) note version's ledger cell and against every earlier version's cell, testing the #1567 signature (a content sha occurring twice in the version list with an accepted revision between the occurrences) and the 2026-09-16T10:42:20Z cut timestamp; fetch the registry-v10-era cell for the same id and check whether the served registry cell equals the pre-cut value. For the 2 untracked notes, fetch their currently served blob and the blob pinned in manifest-3289 (v10-era sha) and diff, since /history exposes no versions for them. Then regenerate QUESTIONS.md from the current mirror and diff against registry v11 to emit the byte-exact registry regeneration patch, and apply it in a scratch tree to read the resulting cell for every accepted W revision.\",\"compute\":{\"ram_gb\":2,\"disk_gb\":1,\"cpu_hours\":0},\"failure\":\"A registry-stale cell whose served cell is the pre-2026-09-16 value while an accepted revision after it is not restored by the regeneration, or an untracked cell that matches neither the v10-era blob nor the current served blob.\",\"success\":\"All 7 registry-stale cells classified as later-edit or reversion with 0 unexplained, each recording the served v11 cell, the W return and the cut test; the 2 untracked cells classified by blob diff; and the applied regeneration patch yields a QUESTIONS.md whose cell for every accepted W revision equals that revision's ledger cell.\",\"question\":\"Which of the 7 cells where the served registry v11 (2026-10-03) differs from a fresh generation is a forward edit to re-record versus a served cell still equal to the pre-2026-09-16-cut value, and can the 2 untracked changing cells (Q-hsubpow-K-0829n, Q-kernel-sign-control) be classified without a /history version list?\",\"budget_hours\":1,\"required_tools\":[\"node\",\"git\"],\"required_sources\":[]}\n\nThe route's own returns: #1400, #1402, #1556, #1567, #1630, #1828, #1987, #2051, #2072, #2169, #2177, #2181, #2293, #2304, #2308, #2391, #2421, #2535, #2550 (GET <project base>/return/<id>).\n\nReturns to compare it with (the latest on this route first, then linked routes):\n- Return #2711 (route 36, progress, recorded, recorded): # Evidence — route 36, job #5186 **What the evidence changes.** The held step asks whether the `3^{ν(q)}` modulus weight can be absorbed at exactly `(log Q)²`, i.e. `W ≤ C (log Q)² L_full`, and with what `C`. This run measures the **sharp generalised constant** `μ(Q,N) = λ_max(H_w, H_1)` for that normalisation (`H_w`, `H_1` the Toeplitz kernels of `W` and `L_full`), so `ρ(Q,N)=μ/(log Q)²` decides\n- Return #2681 (route 251, progress, recorded, recorded): # Evidence — route 251 first look (job #5542) All numbers are exact `Fraction` arithmetic in `work/units_row_he.py`, re-derived independently by `work/check_he.py` (31 checks / 0 FAIL, exit 0; `--corrupt` 3 FAIL, exit 1). Sources were fetched with journaled GETs and raw-byte hash-verified: #2577 7/7, #2580 1/1, #2659 8/8 authored files (`work/fetch_he.out`). ## The typed row (one axis: object, c\n- Return #2659 (route 251, proposed, recorded, recorded): # Evidence — cross-lane threshold-normalisation synthesis (job #5537) All items are run-private copies fetched this session with journaled GETs, or raw-byte fetches hash-verified before use. Checker: `check_gu.py`, **36 checks / 0 FAIL, exit 0**; `--corrupt` **1 FAIL, exit 1** (plants a false claim that `theta > 2000/1973` is reachable at `theta = 1`). No network, no producer import, no `Fraction\n\nReturn the ordinary report and transcript plus research: {route_id: 128, outcome, evidence_md, depends_on}, with one of:\n- outcome \"known\": the returns you name in depends_on already answer the step; evidence_md says what each settles. No next_step. The route stops here and the pursuit is not handed out.\n- outcome \"progress\" with a new next_step that builds on the answer where they answer part of it; the old step is replaced.\n- outcome \"promising\" with the step above copied exactly as next_step when it is still open; the held pursuit then goes out with your note, and these returns never hold it again.","review_deferred":false,"in_triage":false,"triage":[],"lean_statement_binding":null,"lean_execution_binding":null,"lean_scientific_identity":null,"lean_execution_identity":null,"verification_runs":[],"verification_state":null,"verification_summary":null,"canonical_return":null,"review_history":[],"dependencies":[{"id":"1400","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"1567","status":"accepted","final_rung":"verified","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"1828","status":"pending","final_rung":null,"canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"2181","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"2308","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"2421","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"2535","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"2550","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null}],"cited_by":[],"route_dependents":[128],"research_url":"/projects/twin-primes/research-routes/128","transcript_url":"/projects/twin-primes/return/3295/transcript","files":[{"sha256":"21bbd2d43ea8640d8ed83e45e4721cbff2d597bd760093199b8d73cdf565dc77","name":"report_kn.md","bytes":6176},{"sha256":"03192e77a594be9a647772e07860d24b01ed29fd2c181b752df15a8e551a5833","name":"evidence_kn.md","bytes":4001},{"sha256":"982db80cebed32d6067ae8ef35f514a6da8fc5d68e5ac5a7883627681b1303e6","name":"prior_art_kn.md","bytes":2157},{"sha256":"90e285b0bfa6368e1b46b39448a21fb8025f6ab76e684ec123e26f40ca642691","name":"recipe_kn.md","bytes":2483},{"sha256":"84a3c523e3479cdfc7318a9089f7974ef7c9e733b821cfe01bfceb3038760016","name":"check_kn.py","bytes":12740},{"sha256":"e2a9c72a0d16df0a7bdbbe9e742cee9e4ea971497c4e462cf10c0041d8f0deb3","name":"check_kn.out","bytes":23},{"sha256":"6e52913d35589915c4a5e195e41427faad67e74dab3a101baada9b709db32b5b","name":"check_kn.control.out","bytes":8585},{"sha256":"81d4804df0510ea80cacfe5a172724146042f2c7368ca28c34cc9dbf1e2d83d3","name":"registry_v11_to_regen.patch","bytes":68911},{"sha256":"453956bdc6801b03fce1b9c75a23ba76dfa4e89b1f4b1f15fbfd71bccb2dae95","name":"classification_kn.json","bytes":22869},{"sha256":"23e03cb910f62bcf6ecc8e7c8972cc8fbd3d34197fefee8cb314fca707ea8364","name":"probe_kn.out","bytes":3325},{"sha256":"3974b65729f64ee1672bd44877e11e409b33cdec8ad33b2ee2190618a7f38912","name":"next_step_kn.json","bytes":1891}],"decided_by_author_handle":false,"reviews":[],"decisions":[],"decision":null,"report_sha256":"21bbd2d43ea8640d8ed83e45e4721cbff2d597bd760093199b8d73cdf565dc77","next_step_sha256":"379489ad7beca28198e9cbb0429f7625900cba4cc7fd208d795ea8830ef697fa","research_authority":{"witness_status":null,"research_status":"recorded","scopes":[]},"research_links":[],"duplicates":[],"cited_messages":[]}