{"id":3356,"job_id":6986,"problem_id":1,"lane_id":5,"type":"explore","user_id":1,"model":"deepseek-v4-flash","provider":"deepseek","report_md":"# Evidence — route 42 step check (job #6986, run-2026-10-13-af)\n\nRecord comparison only; `cpu_hours = 0`. No experiment was run and no computation a return already\nmade was reproduced. Every line below is re-derived offline by `check_af.py` from this run's own\nserved copies (`served/`) plus `next_step_af.json` and `brief_facts.json`: **31/31, exit 0**\n(`check_af.out`); `--corrupt` (planted `last_return_id`, injected `Lc_6 = 200`) = **4 FAIL, exit 1**\n(`check_af.control.out`).\n\n**Verdict: `promising`.** Route 42's held step is **still open**; it is copied exactly as\n`next_step`. The three brief-named compare returns do not answer it, and the setter itself records\nthe decisive quantity as *not computed*.\n\n## 1. Step identity — the held step is #2573's, unchanged\n- Route 42: `state active`, **revision 14**, `last_return_id` **2573**; newest route event is\n  **2573**, so **no route-42 return follows the setter** (`check_af` A1–A6).\n- Canonical (sorted-key, no-space) sha256 of the route `next_step` object is\n  **`f3b1d64669d65f62d0911158f564ef6404aef2a32b8549252a8b3284fc1d112d`**, equal to\n  **#2573**'s served `next_step_sha256`, to the sha of `#2573.research.next_step`, to the brief's\n  inline \"The step:\" object, and to this run's `next_step_af.json` (A7–A10, D4). The served step's\n  `question` is byte-equal to the assignment's `unresolved_obligation_md` (A11).\n- The step asks: compute the **exact compatible-phase uniform first positive `Lc_6`** (memory-chunked\n  phase grid, `m` over `[150, 420]`, stop at first positive), report `slack_6 = Lc_6/150`, and\n  reproduce #1985's termwise `420`; if the grid is infeasible, tighten the `2.800` bound at the\n  termwise argmin phase. `compute {ram_gb:2, disk_gb:1, cpu_hours:0}`, `budget_hours 1`.\n\n## 2. The setter leaves the step open (no answer on record)\n- **#2573** (route 42, `result`, accepted, verified) is the k=6 **exact-inner** result. Its own\n  table records the route's target as absent: `uniform Lc_6 first positive = **not computed**`\n  (#1985's \"grid 1.7e8 cells\") and gives only the **upper bound** `slack_6 <= 420/150 = 2.800 < 3.000`\n  (B1–B3). The `2.800` is a one-sided consequence of `Lc_6 >= L_6`; the **exact** `Lc_6` first\n  positive — the step's success clause — remains uncomputed (B4). So #2573 does not answer its own\n  successor step; it *defines* it.\n\n## 3. The brief-named compare returns do not answer the step\n- **#3058** (route **45**, `progress`): its own prose contains **none** of the step's distinguishing\n  tokens (`Lc_6`, `slack_6`, `Ece_6`, `phase grid`, `30030`, …); it is a route-45 rescue (an exact\n  classifier for route 45's classes) (C1–C2).\n- **#2910** (route **45**, `inconclusive`, accepted/measured): it is the route-45 log-size sampler\n  (`Cv`/`B58`/`NW`). Its own text states *\"The brief-named comparison does not answer it. #2573\n  (route 42, result, accepted) is the k=6 exact-inner result (`G_6 = 150`, `slack_6 <= 420/150 =\n  2.800`) and carries no `Cv`/`B58`/sampler vocabulary.\"* It contains **0** `Lc_6`; its single\n  `slack_6` occurrence is that comparison remark, not a computation (C3–C6).\n- **#2743** (route **205**, `progress`): its only `exact-inner`/`first positive` hits are a\n  **verbatim quotation** of #2573's object header (`F_k(b,m;tau)=…`, `Ece_k(m)=…`) inside its own\n  route-205 step check; it computes **0** `Lc_6` and **0** `slack_6` (C7–C9).\n- None of the three carries the route-42 step sha as its `next_step`; #3058 and #2910 do not list\n  #2573 in `depends_on` (C10–C11). An unchanged-step comparison on another route is not new evidence.\n\n## 4. Why the verdict is `promising`, not `known` or `progress`\n- `known` would require the named returns to settle the exact `Lc_6` first positive; §3 shows none\n  even mentions `Lc_6`. `progress` would require a return to supply a *partial answer* to the exact\n  value; the only bound on record (`slack_6 <= 2.800`) is #2573's, and #2573 is the setter, not a\n  successor — it does not advance past `Lc_6 >= L_6`. The step is therefore copied exactly, per the\n  brief's `promising` clause.\n\n## 5. Limits\n- Scope is the corpus on record as served at 2026-10-13T02:5xZ: route 42's 14 events and the three\n  brief-named compare returns. The check does not re-run #2573's, #2427's or #1985's computations.\n- `Lc_6`'s uncomputed status is taken from #2573's own table and #1985's note; this run did not\n  attempt the grid (compute hint `cpu_hours 0`, and the brief forbids running the experiment).\n- No claim is made that the grid is infeasible; the step's own `failure` clause keeps the `2.800`\n  bound standing if it is.\n\n## 6. Consequences\n- Route 42's pursuit correctly stays with the **exact** `Lc_6` computation (chunked phase grid via\n  #1985's published inner tables `lc[0..4]`), then the `k=7` gap question. Nothing on record answers\n  it, so the held step is handed out unchanged with this note.\n","patch":null,"cpu_hours":0,"hashes":{"check_af.py":"a068aa3db5742f93a111f8ff84eb8946c18e37262020e672b02e0db6d7f2e27f","fetch_af.py":"a7bd6de56aa8e7bda27145f0b8981211b20a9def3868d2fa9085ebd424d36c9c","check_af.out":"43e27238795d1f3214c743820c021385b92e53d4fd6d244482b8d0ebb432e501","recipe_af.md":"5d99f55b0103339eb2d22506ef8d8f1927900b37b6feb89a508299ce81606341","report_af.md":"e3f7f742942b9332565605ccb616a65240d18a7367b742e91ce77e759d9195cd","analyze_af.py":"8658f545aef6007d15856839c2fe8c03960598923b49e2f1d458a980e602fce1","evidence_af.md":"79dc4f02d337fafc2ec6826b9a5df744d2941ecef07049eb4fcaadfbd1ab6817","prior_art_af.md":"3a4253fbc821f6bba26f421ebead0b9af22512f7fe0bb1799bef4b9fccc1df93","transcript_af.md":"9eaf000d9622c3d7ca72ce100ed878a0461da87c4a39bcc51d9d8f6200e194bc","next_step_af.json":"f45aa507246a17d84b0324a235563a4f86ae0fa325559c60beec0ca54129798e","check_af.control.out":"26229eeb45199c443f520a5dbc501a6009be85b718c980e28ddd5d3af58df3a8","served-return-1985.json":"d1d203be72635ccfd92e0931dba4e98867b30b69aa93130d378d0beddff5fa45","served-return-2230.json":"d39ba8abe99dc7ce9e682cd0e9b9c3d9b181b4474e0639644b6ff1537dc8e565","served-return-2238.json":"fc216edbaf55da2631a43c811844280217a13beb4571495a0cd757eff3a502f2","served-return-2345.json":"f1a807b827ed6723e75a0e1796aabbb2f52003d7536d41fd410699700a9e63d7","served-return-2407.json":"16bbfb15de559b8bbb52e7a2324001fa01035f9ac13dba23d2d1309dff6b2b9c","served-return-2427.json":"71cc74140e87e6e91256596ad3d8d720669caa02314424a8b6e4cd9f94a23158","served-return-2558.json":"c6362c90853c2a63fab6f3fef7474411f90210ea60019198a620941b4ecce3c4","served-return-2573.json":"42b20d227c3335c5b3ba84d30f3f910d99541858b83249a2f404040f944df957","served-return-2743.json":"af6165437ca68c90b70cc0630c1688e4bf6e5d985c6576f41bc875a063e5ea91","served-return-2910.json":"f23079471ebdc1245f46c6491207ce7749aa5abcc95f2fcb798ae9691003f95d","served-return-3058.json":"601a4936d8f18bdd14ce3619ea63b5c4c859e0cf30d15fb04c33c082d309c1bd","served-research-routes-42.json":"0ac7f5d1ffacd98cc8c58cc74b71b76ff2a757afd51992038a78428fef351b3b"},"author_rung":"measured","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","created_at":"2026-10-13T02:54:14.780Z","repo_url":null,"commit":null,"cites":{"files":["e3f7f742942b9332565605ccb616a65240d18a7367b742e91ce77e759d9195cd","79dc4f02d337fafc2ec6826b9a5df744d2941ecef07049eb4fcaadfbd1ab6817","3a4253fbc821f6bba26f421ebead0b9af22512f7fe0bb1799bef4b9fccc1df93","5d99f55b0103339eb2d22506ef8d8f1927900b37b6feb89a508299ce81606341","9eaf000d9622c3d7ca72ce100ed878a0461da87c4a39bcc51d9d8f6200e194bc","f45aa507246a17d84b0324a235563a4f86ae0fa325559c60beec0ca54129798e","a068aa3db5742f93a111f8ff84eb8946c18e37262020e672b02e0db6d7f2e27f","43e27238795d1f3214c743820c021385b92e53d4fd6d244482b8d0ebb432e501","26229eeb45199c443f520a5dbc501a6009be85b718c980e28ddd5d3af58df3a8","a7bd6de56aa8e7bda27145f0b8981211b20a9def3868d2fa9085ebd424d36c9c","8658f545aef6007d15856839c2fe8c03960598923b49e2f1d458a980e602fce1","0ac7f5d1ffacd98cc8c58cc74b71b76ff2a757afd51992038a78428fef351b3b","42b20d227c3335c5b3ba84d30f3f910d99541858b83249a2f404040f944df957","71cc74140e87e6e91256596ad3d8d720669caa02314424a8b6e4cd9f94a23158","d1d203be72635ccfd92e0931dba4e98867b30b69aa93130d378d0beddff5fa45","f1a807b827ed6723e75a0e1796aabbb2f52003d7536d41fd410699700a9e63d7","c6362c90853c2a63fab6f3fef7474411f90210ea60019198a620941b4ecce3c4","16bbfb15de559b8bbb52e7a2324001fa01035f9ac13dba23d2d1309dff6b2b9c","fc216edbaf55da2631a43c811844280217a13beb4571495a0cd757eff3a502f2","d39ba8abe99dc7ce9e682cd0e9b9c3d9b181b4474e0639644b6ff1537dc8e565","601a4936d8f18bdd14ce3619ea63b5c4c859e0cf30d15fb04c33c082d309c1bd","f23079471ebdc1245f46c6491207ce7749aa5abcc95f2fcb798ae9691003f95d","af6165437ca68c90b70cc0630c1688e4bf6e5d985c6576f41bc875a063e5ea91"],"handles":[],"returns":[2573,3058,2910,2743,2558,2427,2407,2345,2238,1985],"messages":[]},"tokens":{"log":"summary","input":0,"models":{},"output":0,"source":"none","entries":0,"cache_read":0,"cache_write":0,"observed_models":[]},"paper_slug":null,"revision_path":null,"revision_sha":null,"recipe_md":null,"verification":null,"target":null,"finding":null,"human_md":null,"provisional":false,"effects_applied_at":null,"effort":null,"also_fix":null,"transcript_omitted":{"share":0,"omitted":0,"outputs":0},"patch_hash":null,"superseded_by":null,"duplicate_of":null,"transcript_resubmitted_at":null,"file_notes":null,"research":{"outcome":"promising","route_id":42,"next_step":{"method":"Compute the compatible-phase uniform first positive Lc_6 = max(L_6(m), min over admissible (b mod W_6, tau) of [m - sum_i sum_a pc(b,m,p_i,a) + sum_{i<j} sum_{a,z} Lc_i(pc(b,m,p_i p_j, crt(a,p_i,z,p_j)))]) exactly, using #1985's published inner tables lc[0..4] (pairs have inner prefix <=4), by a memory-chunked evaluation (chunk taus so the (tau,b) arrays stay under ~300 MB) scanning m over the candidate window [150, 420] and stopping at the first positive; L_6(m) is cheap and its first positive is the cited 420. Report the exact slack_6 = Lc_6 first positive / 150 and update the exact ratio sequence. If the full grid is infeasible, evaluate the coupled value at the termwise argmin phase to tighten the 2.800 upper bound. Do not recompute G_k (done here) and do not rerun the #2427 k=5 result.","compute":{"ram_gb":2,"disk_gb":1,"cpu_hours":0},"failure":"The chunked phase grid cannot be completed within the assignment's compute, in which case the rigorous bound slack_6 <= 2.800 (falsifying monotone growth) stands and the exact Lc_6 first positive remains open.","success":"Lc_6's first positive is reported as an exact integer with an independent check, giving the exact slack_6 in [1.000, 2.800] and completing the exact finite ratio sequence for k=3,4,5,6.","question":"The exact-inner first positive at prefix 13 equals the calibration H_6=150 and the coupling slack ratio cannot exceed 2.800 at k=6 (below its k=5 value 3.000), so the monotone-growth alarm is dead. Is the exact compatible-phase uniform first positive Lc_6 pinning the ratio further below 2.800, and does the gap between the uniform certificate and the exact value keep shrinking for k=7 (W=510510)?","budget_hours":1,"required_tools":[],"required_sources":[]},"depends_on":[2573,3058,2910,2743,2558,2427,2407,2345,2238,1985],"evidence_md":"# Evidence — route 42 step check (job #6986), record comparison, cpu_hours 0\n\nServed copies re-derived offline by `check_af.py` (stdlib, no network): **31/31, exit 0**;\n`--corrupt` **4 FAIL, exit 1**. Served records: `/research-routes/42` and returns\n#2573, #2427, #1985, #2345, #2558, #2407, #2238, #2230, #3058, #2910, #2743.\n\n- **Step binding.** Route 42 `active`, revision 14, `last_return_id` 2573; newest route event 2573\n  (no route-42 return after the setter). Canonical sha256 of route `next_step` =\n  `f3b1d64669d65f62d0911158f564ef6404aef2a32b8549252a8b3284fc1d112d` = #2573 `next_step_sha256` =\n  #2573 `research.next_step` = brief inline step = local `next_step_af.json`. Step `question`\n  byte-equal to the assignment `unresolved_obligation_md`.\n- **Setter #2573 leaves it open.** Its table: `uniform Lc_6 first positive | not computed`\n  (#1985 \"grid 1.7e8 cells\"); only `slack_6 <= 420/150 = 2.800 < 3.000` from `Lc_6 >= L_6`. The\n  **exact** `Lc_6` (the step's success clause) is not computed.\n- **#3058** (route 45, progress): **0** route-42 step tokens in its own prose (route-45 classifier\n  work; an unchanged-step comparison on another route is not new evidence).\n- **#2910** (route 45, inconclusive, accepted): its own text — *\"The brief-named comparison does not\n  answer it. #2573 … is the k=6 exact-inner result (`G_6 = 150`, `slack_6 <= 420/150 = 2.800`) and\n  carries no `Cv`/`B58`/sampler vocabulary.\"* — 0 `Lc_6`; its single `slack_6` is that remark.\n- **#2743** (route 205, progress): its `exact-inner`/`first positive` hits are a **verbatim\n  quotation** of #2573's object header inside its own route-205 step check; 0 `Lc_6`, 0 `slack_6`.\n- **No successor carries the step.** None of #3058/#2910/#2743 has the route-42 step sha as\n  `next_step`; #3058 and #2910 do not list #2573 in `depends_on`.\n- **Verdict `promising`.** No return supplies even a partial answer to the exact `Lc_6`; the only\n  bound on record is the setter's own. The step is copied exactly as `next_step` (per the brief's\n  `promising` clause). `known` is excluded (nothing mentions `Lc_6`); `progress` is excluded (no new\n  partial answer).\n\nLimits: corpus as served 2026-10-13; #2573/#2427/#1985 computations were not re-run; `Lc_6`'s\nuncomputed status is taken from #2573's table and #1985's note. No infeasibility claim is made.","prior_art_md":"# Prior art — route 42 step check (job #6986)\n\nThis return is a **corpus-internal record comparison** (a \"first look\" step check). It cites no new\nexternal literature; the relevant prior art is the project's own route-42 chain and the linked\nreturns the brief names. All ids below are served records read in this run.\n\n## Route 42's own chain (newest first)\n- **#2573** (result, accepted, verified) — the **step setter**. Exact-inner at k=6: `G_6 = 150 =\n  H_6`, argmax tau 688, `Ece_6(149)=0`, `Ece_6(150)>=1`; slack ratios 1.556, 2.733, 3.000 (k=3..5);\n  `uniform Lc_6 first positive` **not computed**; `slack_6 <= 420/150 = 2.800`.\n- **#2558** (promising) — route-42 step check of the k=6 `Ece_6` slack step; copies a step, no answer.\n- **#2427** (result, accepted, verified) — exact-inner at k=5 (`Ece_5` first positive 66; 198);\n  makes the #2345 zero-slack knife edge `Lc_5(198)=1 / Lc_5(197)=0` an artifact of the uniform inner bound.\n- **#2407** (promising) — earlier step check.\n- **#2345** (progress) — the route-42 port of route 40's compatible-phase coupled certificate `Lc_k`.\n- **#2238** (promising) / **#2230** (blocked, verified) / **#2224**, **#1862**, **#1006**, **#693**,\n  **#688** — earlier route-42 work. #2230's blocked witness (b,m,k,tau)=(1081,65,5,82) is a *dead end*\n  at its stated scope, not an impossibility result.\n\n## Premises the step rests on\n- **#1985** (route 40, progress) — the compatible-phase coupled certificate and its published inner\n  tables `lc[0..4]` (pairs have inner prefix <=4); supplies the termwise #996 first positives\n  `30, 90, 210, 420` and the uniform first positives `28, 82, 198` (k=3,4,5). Its own note leaves the\n  k=6 grid (\"1.7e8 cells\") **uncomputed**.\n- **#996** — the CRT-recursion identity the termwise values are conditional on (cited via #1985).\n\n## The brief-named compare returns (checked; none answers the step)\n- **#3058** (route 45, progress) — route-45 rescue: an exact classifier for route 45's classes\n  (smallest-prime-factor sieve). No route-42 step vocabulary.\n- **#2910** (route 45, inconclusive, accepted) — route-45 log-size sampler (`Cv`/`B58`/`NW`). Its own\n  (E6) remark states it does **not** answer the route-42 comparison.\n- **#2743** (route 205, progress) — route-205 step check; quotes #2573's object header verbatim,\n  computes neither `Lc_6` nor `slack_6`.\n\n## Exact remaining gap (nothing on record closes it)\nThe published ladders give the values `H_k`/`G_k` but not the **exact compatible-phase uniform first\npositive `Lc_6`**; on record it is explicitly *not computed* (#2573 table; #1985 note). No return\nafter the setter touches `Lc_6`. External literature is irrelevant to this step, which is a finite\ncomputation over the project's own coupled certificate — no new source search was performed, and\nnone is needed for a record comparison."},"research_route_id":42,"verification_plan":null,"verification_fingerprint":null,"review_admitted_at":null,"department_id":"dept_0e793a31e299699dfaaa6fee","run_id":"run_1ced1986891368c8e44a8d62","triage_lead":null,"revision_base_sha":null,"integration":null,"resolves":null,"paper_exposition":null,"research_evidence":null,"transcript_mode":"summary","known_work":null,"work_disposition":null,"applicability_assessment":null,"handle":"Benjaminsen","job_brief":"Step check before pursuit. Route #42's next experiment was set by return #2573, and returns were recorded after it on this route or a route linked to it by citations, dependencies or shared premises. Before a pursuit is spent on it, decide whether the returns already on record answer it. Read and compare; do not run the experiment and do not reproduce a computation a return already made. An unchanged-step comparison on another route is not new evidence.\n\nThe step:\n{\"method\":\"Compute the compatible-phase uniform first positive Lc_6 = max(L_6(m), min over admissible (b mod W_6, tau) of [m - sum_i sum_a pc(b,m,p_i,a) + sum_{i<j} sum_{a,z} Lc_i(pc(b,m,p_i p_j, crt(a,p_i,z,p_j)))]) exactly, using #1985's published inner tables lc[0..4] (pairs have inner prefix <=4), by a memory-chunked evaluation (chunk taus so the (tau,b) arrays stay under ~300 MB) scanning m over the candidate window [150, 420] and stopping at the first positive; L_6(m) is cheap and its first positive is the cited 420. Report the exact slack_6 = Lc_6 first positive / 150 and update the exact ratio sequence. If the full grid is infeasible, evaluate the coupled value at the termwise argmin phase to tighten the 2.800 upper bound. Do not recompute G_k (done here) and do not rerun the #2427 k=5 result.\",\"compute\":{\"ram_gb\":2,\"disk_gb\":1,\"cpu_hours\":0},\"failure\":\"The chunked phase grid cannot be completed within the assignment's compute, in which case the rigorous bound slack_6 <= 2.800 (falsifying monotone growth) stands and the exact Lc_6 first positive remains open.\",\"success\":\"Lc_6's first positive is reported as an exact integer with an independent check, giving the exact slack_6 in [1.000, 2.800] and completing the exact finite ratio sequence for k=3,4,5,6.\",\"question\":\"The exact-inner first positive at prefix 13 equals the calibration H_6=150 and the coupling slack ratio cannot exceed 2.800 at k=6 (below its k=5 value 3.000), so the monotone-growth alarm is dead. Is the exact compatible-phase uniform first positive Lc_6 pinning the ratio further below 2.800, and does the gap between the uniform certificate and the exact value keep shrinking for k=7 (W=510510)?\",\"budget_hours\":1,\"required_tools\":[],\"required_sources\":[]}\n\nThe route's own returns: #688, #693, #1006, #1862, #2224, #2230, #2238, #2341, #2345, #2407, #2427, #2558, #2573 (GET <project base>/return/<id>).\n\nReturns to compare it with (the latest on this route first, then linked routes):\n- Return #3058 (route 45, progress, recorded, recorded): Evidence — job #6229 (route 45 rescue), attempt [attempt id redacted] WHAT IS NEW. Three things, all finite and exact. (1) An independent exact classifier for route 45's classes, gated on the served record. `exact45.py` sieves a smallest-prime-factor table over segments and folds every odd squarefree e in (isqrt(x), Q], Q = x // ceil(x^(12/25)), with the predicates transcribed from cover_cmp.py \n- Return #2910 (route 45, inconclusive, accepted, measured): # Evidence — job #5292 (route 45 pursuit: log-size model for the Cv/B58/NW step) Full tables: `report.md`. Raw: `exact45.json`, `exact45b.json`, `model45.json`, `analysis_jb.json`, `check_jb.out`. Record facts are served GETs (`/research-routes/45`, `/return/2512`, `2383`, `2882`), all declared files hash-verified (`served_hashes_jb.json`); measurements are this job's own. **(E1) Step.** Route 4\n- Return #2743 (route 205, progress, recorded, recorded): # Evidence — route 205 step check (job #5745) Comparison of recorded evidence only; `cpu_hours = 0`. Every line below is re-derived by `check_hz.py` from this run's own served copies (`served/`, `served/raw/`): **43/43, exit 0**; `--corrupt` (planted `last_return_id`, dropped `types`, mutated `core_run`, mutated ladder entry) = **7 FAIL, exit 1**. Served ids arrive as strings; compared in string \n\nReturn the ordinary report and transcript plus research: {route_id: 42, outcome, evidence_md, depends_on}, with one of:\n- outcome \"known\": the returns you name in depends_on already answer the step; evidence_md says what each settles. No next_step. The route stops here and the pursuit is not handed out.\n- outcome \"progress\" with a new next_step that builds on the answer where they answer part of it; the old step is replaced.\n- outcome \"promising\" with the step above copied exactly as next_step when it is still open; the held pursuit then goes out with your note, and these returns never hold it again.","review_deferred":false,"in_triage":false,"triage":[],"lean_statement_binding":null,"lean_execution_binding":null,"lean_scientific_identity":null,"lean_execution_identity":null,"verification_runs":[],"verification_state":null,"verification_summary":null,"canonical_return":null,"review_history":[],"dependencies":[{"id":"1985","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"2238","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"2345","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"2407","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"2427","status":"accepted","final_rung":"verified","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"2558","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"2573","status":"accepted","final_rung":"verified","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"2743","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"2910","status":"accepted","final_rung":"measured","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"3058","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null}],"cited_by":[],"route_dependents":[42],"research_url":"/projects/twin-primes/research-routes/42","transcript_url":"/projects/twin-primes/return/3356/transcript","files":[{"sha256":"e3f7f742942b9332565605ccb616a65240d18a7367b742e91ce77e759d9195cd","name":"report_af.md","bytes":4920},{"sha256":"79dc4f02d337fafc2ec6826b9a5df744d2941ecef07049eb4fcaadfbd1ab6817","name":"evidence_af.md","bytes":2345},{"sha256":"3a4253fbc821f6bba26f421ebead0b9af22512f7fe0bb1799bef4b9fccc1df93","name":"prior_art_af.md","bytes":2864},{"sha256":"5d99f55b0103339eb2d22506ef8d8f1927900b37b6feb89a508299ce81606341","name":"recipe_af.md","bytes":2970},{"sha256":"9eaf000d9622c3d7ca72ce100ed878a0461da87c4a39bcc51d9d8f6200e194bc","name":"transcript_af.md","bytes":4131},{"sha256":"f45aa507246a17d84b0324a235563a4f86ae0fa325559c60beec0ca54129798e","name":"next_step_af.json","bytes":1793},{"sha256":"a068aa3db5742f93a111f8ff84eb8946c18e37262020e672b02e0db6d7f2e27f","name":"check_af.py","bytes":9697},{"sha256":"43e27238795d1f3214c743820c021385b92e53d4fd6d244482b8d0ebb432e501","name":"check_af.out","bytes":149},{"sha256":"26229eeb45199c443f520a5dbc501a6009be85b718c980e28ddd5d3af58df3a8","name":"check_af.control.out","bytes":458},{"sha256":"a7bd6de56aa8e7bda27145f0b8981211b20a9def3868d2fa9085ebd424d36c9c","name":"fetch_af.py","bytes":1462},{"sha256":"8658f545aef6007d15856839c2fe8c03960598923b49e2f1d458a980e602fce1","name":"analyze_af.py","bytes":2429},{"sha256":"0ac7f5d1ffacd98cc8c58cc74b71b76ff2a757afd51992038a78428fef351b3b","name":"served-research-routes-42.json","bytes":149287},{"sha256":"42b20d227c3335c5b3ba84d30f3f910d99541858b83249a2f404040f944df957","name":"served-return-2573.json","bytes":36116},{"sha256":"71cc74140e87e6e91256596ad3d8d720669caa02314424a8b6e4cd9f94a23158","name":"served-return-2427.json","bytes":40464},{"sha256":"d1d203be72635ccfd92e0931dba4e98867b30b69aa93130d378d0beddff5fa45","name":"served-return-1985.json","bytes":33052},{"sha256":"f1a807b827ed6723e75a0e1796aabbb2f52003d7536d41fd410699700a9e63d7","name":"served-return-2345.json","bytes":27745},{"sha256":"c6362c90853c2a63fab6f3fef7474411f90210ea60019198a620941b4ecce3c4","name":"served-return-2558.json","bytes":66687},{"sha256":"16bbfb15de559b8bbb52e7a2324001fa01035f9ac13dba23d2d1309dff6b2b9c","name":"served-return-2407.json","bytes":26154},{"sha256":"fc216edbaf55da2631a43c811844280217a13beb4571495a0cd757eff3a502f2","name":"served-return-2238.json","bytes":18623},{"sha256":"d39ba8abe99dc7ce9e682cd0e9b9c3d9b181b4474e0639644b6ff1537dc8e565","name":"served-return-2230.json","bytes":37918},{"sha256":"601a4936d8f18bdd14ce3619ea63b5c4c859e0cf30d15fb04c33c082d309c1bd","name":"served-return-3058.json","bytes":32001},{"sha256":"f23079471ebdc1245f46c6491207ce7749aa5abcc95f2fcb798ae9691003f95d","name":"served-return-2910.json","bytes":55170},{"sha256":"af6165437ca68c90b70cc0630c1688e4bf6e5d985c6576f41bc875a063e5ea91","name":"served-return-2743.json","bytes":37912}],"decided_by_author_handle":false,"reviews":[],"decisions":[],"decision":null,"report_sha256":"e3f7f742942b9332565605ccb616a65240d18a7367b742e91ce77e759d9195cd","next_step_sha256":"f3b1d64669d65f62d0911158f564ef6404aef2a32b8549252a8b3284fc1d112d","research_authority":{"witness_status":null,"research_status":"recorded","scopes":[]},"research_links":[],"duplicates":[],"cited_messages":[]}