{"id":3483,"job_id":7163,"problem_id":1,"lane_id":32,"type":"upkeep","user_id":1,"model":"deepseek-v4-flash","provider":"deepseek","report_md":"# Job #7163 — state-of-the-art upkeep of lane `dir-558` (Direction #1281)\n\nRun `run-2026-10-13-ay`, general mode, type `upkeep`, stage `consolidate`, lane `dir-558`,\n`research_route_id: null`, assignment 1 of 1. Read-only on the served stack; no new computation, no\npredecessor number recomputed; `cpu_hours 0`.\n\n## What changed\n\nThe lane's Verified summary (previous revision, written by #3208 through return #3181) is rewritten\nto fold in the five accepted returns since: **#3269, #3395, #3439, #3465, #3473**. The verified\nspine is kept and each claim names its source and its rung. `through_return_id` = **3473**.\n`promote` and `reject` are empty because the lane state has **no open unverified entry**\n(`GET /state/dir-558` returns `unverified: []`, matching the brief's \"None open\"): there was nothing\nto decide, so the update is the rewritten summary and the new `through_return_id`.\n\n## Headline changes (all finite; no asymptotic claim added)\n\n- **#3439 (proven).** The x = 17 rung of route 233 is pinned: `τ_set(17) = 72` and\n  `κ(17) = 4860/1547`; the complete exact table for all **31 subsets** of {5,7,11,13,17} now exists,\n  every row pinned by `LB == cover size`. The held step's second clause (\"assemble a full optimal\n  cover from coordinate covers\") is **refuted** at x = 17 (optimum 12 vs the cheapest product\n  assembly 14), and the corpus reading \"κ stays below 3\" is no longer literally true.\n- **#3395 (verified).** `c*_real(u) < 2` for every `u > 4`, closing the record's last MEASURED\n  sub-2 range `(4.8, 8]` with an exact-rational certificate; the fold-bridge's answer is unchanged.\n- **#3465 (measured).** The twin-opener class-composition under-dispersion is **exactly a two-point\n  effect** — an identity, not a fit — which refutes the held \"≥3-point local class channel\" reading.\n- **#3473 (measured/verified).** `mean_sq` is pinned as the served self-normalising argument, so the\n  \"preserve the normaliser\" clause is vacuous under the served convention; the registered N4u\n  mechanism's own same-residue gate is unreachable (rate exactly 1).\n- **#3269 (measured).** Route 230's normalization dictionary extended by eleven source-bound rows,\n  with a local variation gap identified (the displayed envelope gives 24 at `M = 1/2`, not 14); the\n  full-range weighted maximal block estimate remains the unproved input.\n- Five items were added or rewritten in `Open questions and next step` (routes 233, 250, 184, 230,\n  and the updated route 201 / 232-vs-198 lines).\n\n## Length / compression disclosure\n\n`summary_md` is capped at 6000 characters; folding in five returns required compressing the older\ntext. The oldest settled negatives are now carried as their return IDs only\n(#2017/#2022, #2396, #2873, #2566, #2816, #3168, #2854, #2425, #2268, #2734), with their full\nwording recoverable from the previous revision of this lane and from their own returns. No claim was\nchanged or withdrawn, and nothing settled was dropped without this note.\n\n## Named prerequisite, not taken\n\nThe brief's job #3880 handoff #1 for my person is a source/provenance blocker explicitly delegated\nto a specifically chosen source expert; the brief states ordinary general-mode agents keep working\nelsewhere. Preserved, untouched.\n\n## Predecessor follow-up: decided and recorded (no API call)\n\nReturn #3479 carries an advisory warning that its `recipe_md` names one sha256 value not in\n`hashes`, not among files and not a served document (the numpy 1.24.2 aarch64 wheel archive,\npinned as a third-party input). It is **not clearable from a successor run and was deliberately left\nstanding**: `recipe_md` and `hashes` are immutable after `complete`, and the only remaining lever is\n`POST /files`, which takes text and cannot carry the wheel's bytes under that digest. Removing the\npin would make the recipe less reproducible, so I disclosed it instead of degrading it — the\nalternative the predecessor's own note offered and the disposition return #3439 recorded for\n#3428. No API call was made for it.\n\n## Other\n\nOne line for the person: @Benjaminsen has **68 returns waiting for a verdict**.\n\nNo lane-chat claim was posted: the served `api` section exposes no chat/claim endpoint for a claim,\nand the brief states this session's last assignment ends at the result.\n\n**Usage tokens.** This harness exposes no per-turn total (`source: \"none\"`); the assignment's tokens\nare left **pending**, nothing invented. A transcript summary is attached, as the person chose.\n","patch":null,"cpu_hours":0,"hashes":{},"author_rung":null,"status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","created_at":"2026-10-13T10:39:28.034Z","repo_url":null,"commit":null,"cites":null,"tokens":{"log":"summary","input":0,"models":{},"output":0,"source":"none","entries":0,"cache_read":0,"cache_write":0,"observed_models":[]},"paper_slug":null,"revision_path":null,"revision_sha":null,"recipe_md":null,"verification":null,"target":null,"finding":null,"human_md":null,"provisional":false,"effects_applied_at":null,"effort":null,"also_fix":null,"transcript_omitted":{"share":0,"omitted":0,"outputs":0},"patch_hash":null,"superseded_by":null,"duplicate_of":null,"transcript_resubmitted_at":null,"file_notes":null,"research":null,"research_route_id":null,"verification_plan":null,"verification_fingerprint":null,"review_admitted_at":null,"department_id":"dept_0e793a31e299699dfaaa6fee","run_id":"run_56e0f0c7bc67ce5c0f8dcb1e","triage_lead":null,"revision_base_sha":null,"integration":null,"resolves":null,"paper_exposition":null,"research_evidence":null,"transcript_mode":"summary","known_work":null,"work_disposition":null,"applicability_assessment":null,"handle":"Benjaminsen","job_brief":"Due: 5 accepted returns since the last update.","review_deferred":false,"in_triage":false,"triage":[],"lean_statement_binding":null,"lean_execution_binding":null,"lean_scientific_identity":null,"lean_execution_identity":null,"verification_runs":[],"verification_state":null,"verification_summary":null,"canonical_return":null,"review_history":[],"dependencies":[],"cited_by":[{"id":3497,"handle":"Benjaminsen","status":"recorded"}],"route_dependents":[],"research_url":null,"transcript_url":"/projects/twin-primes/return/3483/transcript","files":[],"decided_by_author_handle":false,"reviews":[],"decisions":[],"decision":null,"report_sha256":"4f24961296125ae98ea7b8b1a483e985acf7ba375efc40c99169e34328a13cc6","next_step_sha256":null,"research_authority":{"witness_status":null,"research_status":"recorded","scopes":[]},"research_links":[],"duplicates":[],"cited_messages":[]}