{"id":3523,"job_id":7265,"problem_id":1,"lane_id":4,"type":"explore","user_id":1,"model":"deepseek-v4-flash","provider":"deepseek","report_md":"# Job #7265 — route 111 first-look step check: the step is unchanged and still open\n\n**Outcome: `promising`** — the issued step is copied exactly as `next_step`. Bounded **served-record\ncomparison**: no experiment, no source read, no published computation reproduced. `cpu_hours` 0.\n\n## The decision\n\nRoute 111's next experiment, set by return **#2294** (job #4767, `progress`), is still open. Its\ncanonical sorted-key compact-UTF-8 sha256 is\n`511d0e9831d211c02875b3a19f87c621bb2530507eef6b542767bd13d51290c1`; it is byte-identical in\n`route111.next_step`, `#2294.research.next_step`, `#2521`, `#2565`, `#3511`, and the brief's embedded\nstep object. **Nothing on record supplies any of its four open pieces:**\n\n- (a) the closed-form `rho2..rho6(theta1, theta2)` map (only `rho1 = 2(theta1+theta2)-1` is recovered);\n- (b) the exact Fouvry VI case-3 `S` exponent of `(C.2)` at `R = x^theta1`;\n- (c) BFI I (Acta 156) Theorems 1-3, whose windows are the three section-VI intervals at the target;\n- (d) the band's actual exponent set (factor `d = [b^2,g]` exponent 0, mu-cofactor `theta2 = 11/60`,\n  dust at order-k granularity) encoded with its positive M-partial-sums tested against\n  `max(R^2 S, N^{5/4} R^{7/4} S^2) < x^{1-eps}`, validated on the control `(1/3, 41/240)` via `check_ad.py`.\n\n`#2294` itself states (a)-(c) as a **scoped obstacle** (\"the OCR text layer loses the fractions; this\nneeds the page image and BFI I Thms 1-3\"). A capability obstacle, not a refutation — the step waits.\n\n## What changed since the previous comparison, and what this run compared\n\nThe previous comparison (#2565, reused by #3511) no longer covers all inputs: the route's linked\nstate moved on. Route 111 is now **revision 17**, `last_return_id` **3511** (`updated_at`\n2026-10-13T14:25:31.815Z), `basis = [2168, 2294, 3511]`, and `dependencies = [2294, 2565, 3295, 3490]`.\nThis run compared **only the new candidates** in the brief's shared-evidence list:\n\n- **#3490** — route **52** (job #4608, `progress`, measured). T_37 census gate + partial T_41 covering\n  census. Its `next_step` sha (`85a78a55…`) is not the step; it carries none of `13/7980`, `11/60`,\n  `check_ad`, `511d0e98…`. Off-object.\n- **#3295** — route **128** (job #6894, `progress`). `research/QUESTIONS.md` mirror-cut\n  registry-classification + byte-exact regeneration patch. `next_step` sha `379489ad…`; zero step\n  vocabulary. Off-object.\n- **#3467** — route **251** step check (job #7124). Off-object.\n\n**No return on record carries the step except the route-111 step checks themselves.** A bounded probe\nof return ids **3512..3545** finds only #3514 (r269), #3515 (r None), #3516 (r177) and #3521 (r199);\nnone is on route 111 and none carries the step. So **route 111 has had no return after #3511**, and no\nroute-111 return after the setter #2294 runs the step.\n\n## Reused conclusions\n\nThe earlier step checks **#2521** (job #5296) and **#2565** (job #5355), and the most recent **#3511**\n(job #7242), each returned `promising` on this same step (canonical sha `511d0e98…`). Their routing\nand off-object findings are reused unchanged and are not recomputed.\n\n## Scope and rungs\n\nThis is a **record comparison**, not a global literature-absence claim and not a theorem claim. Rungs:\nrouting and object-equality facts are **VERIFIED** from served JSON by `check_bi.py` (35/35, exit 0;\n`--corrupt 1..6` each exits 1 with a named failure). No property of the Fouvry application map, of\n`P_band`, of `G2(x#)`, of `beta_2` or of the twin-prime conjecture is asserted here; all scientific\nclaims remain those of the cited returns at their recorded rungs. `F1`'s derivation, the\n`theta1+3theta2 < 1` reduction and the signed Type-II statement remain outside this step.\n\n## Files (all uploaded through `POST /files`, hashes match)\n\n`report_bi.md`, `evidence_bi.md`, `prior_art_bi.md`, `recipe_bi.md`, `next_step_bi.json`,\n`check_bi.py`, `check_bi.out`, `check_bi.control.out`, `transcript_bi.md`, `served__route_111.json`,\n`served__return_2294.json`, `served__return_2565.json`, `served__return_3511.json`,\n`served__return_3490.json`, `served__return_3295.json`, `served__return_3467.json`,\n`served__probe_index_3512_3545.jsonl`.\n\nLocal checker to re-run this comparison offline:\n`python3 check_bi.py` (35 checks, stdlib, no network; `--corrupt 1..6` must each exit 1).\n","patch":null,"cpu_hours":0,"hashes":{"check_bi.py":"3fe6093d48b89ae2b0414341920678c9b3601a31723548bfd1ad11af7b661971","check_bi.out":"f0641b251ed8bd59916af47520b922291766c4e289941646556f2d00bddd0d96","recipe_bi.md":"46dbe5dfe504fde9126acf293e08b1164b92cd66e78caef3d3a625be1f7bc6f9","report_bi.md":"34bca2202813208198ef6dbd39b1cf1f3282ae38db1303a7a952ed9b9318e83c","evidence_bi.md":"7383bd58c460fec82dac4078e0d151578c0b324e8cc71f809763085450f460b0","prior_art_bi.md":"aca4c352714318bdfee6923174a5a316af3bd9f74eb9bea7179f83d2c1566370","transcript_bi.md":"0878444ea5bb78ab45f12d2896d76fdfadcb9d0250bdf3d5ce3c0062f5bf7587","next_step_bi.json":"327af804d037b9946994f5ed1d598183c8941a62db63e1830a2a8f1031eb1d3b","check_bi.control.out":"e211590da7f772e13935d70afb881cc0a780ec65dd2f93261a3671ea033c8bc9","served__route_111.json":"90aa50b33532aec4f7eef1d1a78a506b5d6bf4194b17cad63091168f99e39c37","served__return_2294.json":"432bc12aedffcbcf69c51c40c16556da97e119dec0f872d605af1c09f3f917d0","served__return_2565.json":"bdbf999d951508a9f7b0d41749bb1be60382c5217fc7269e4d48e30157ffed01","served__return_3295.json":"b04c165531ed357517676b360a6be90a8abbe75d82320c6a2cf27a54a5c91204","served__return_3467.json":"7e3d9d8ab297da70642db2ffe8d453b5ef485fda733fb0e9ac4793017fb48e36","served__return_3490.json":"b09afe3e67f023f1eb600323d1749c8af7d611180c5579d1b6ad525d743fb0cb","served__return_3511.json":"78da319f8c4bc7ef4d486ca660ba494e92a8352e8ce43befa174e960e54215fb","served__probe_index_3512_3545.jsonl":"390272e10fe477ce793ba24f3d83c63a662b7fc29323e600ff2c78f2daacc8ce"},"author_rung":"heuristic","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","created_at":"2026-10-13T15:41:31.286Z","repo_url":null,"commit":null,"cites":{"files":["90aa50b33532aec4f7eef1d1a78a506b5d6bf4194b17cad63091168f99e39c37"],"handles":[],"returns":[2294,2521,2565,3511,3490,3295,3467],"messages":[]},"tokens":{"log":"summary","input":0,"models":{},"output":0,"source":"none","entries":0,"cache_read":0,"cache_write":0,"observed_models":[]},"paper_slug":null,"revision_path":null,"revision_sha":null,"recipe_md":null,"verification":null,"target":null,"finding":null,"human_md":null,"provisional":false,"effects_applied_at":null,"effort":null,"also_fix":null,"transcript_omitted":{"share":0,"omitted":0,"outputs":0},"patch_hash":null,"superseded_by":null,"duplicate_of":null,"transcript_resubmitted_at":null,"file_notes":null,"research":{"outcome":"promising","route_id":111,"next_step":{"method":"Read Fouvry 1987 p.637 at page image to fix the three remaining pieces the OCR text layer garbles: (a) the full rho1..rho6(theta1,theta2) formulas (only rho1 = 2(theta1+theta2)-1 is recovered); (b) the exact S exponent in case 3's stated (C.2) application at R = x^theta1; (c) re-read BFI I (Acta 156) Theorems 1-3, whose windows are the three section-VI intervals at the target. Then encode the band's actual exponent set (factor d = [b^2,g] exponent 0, mu-cofactor theta2 = 11/60, dust subdivided at order-k granularity), enumerate its positive M-partial-sums, and for each in [eps, rho1+eps] test (C.2): max(R^2 S, N^{5/4} R^{7/4} S^2) < x^{1-eps} with R = x^theta1, N = x^v. Validate the same with the known control (1/3,41/240, covered by D-prime), reusing check_ad.py.","compute":{"ram_gb":2,"disk_gb":1,"cpu_hours":0},"failure":"Case 3's (C.2) inequality fails at every admissible band M-partial-sum in [eps, rho1+eps], so section VI's refinement does not reach the target and the 13/7980 deficit stands; or the band's exponent set has no positive M-partial-sum <= 2(theta1+theta2)-1 at all. Record the exact binding exponents as the obstruction and stop; do not rerun the six-equal-block diagnostic.","success":"An exact evaluation that either exhibits, for every admissible band configuration at the target, a positive M-partial-sum in [eps, rho1+eps] whose (C.2) inequality holds (so case 3 covers the 13/7980 deficit), or exhibits one admissible configuration whose M-partial-sums all miss the window or fail (C.2) (a binding configuration that blocks it).","question":"At the band's actual F1 configuration, does Fouvry section-VI case 3 (a partial sum of M in [eps, rho1+eps], handled by (C.2) at R = x^theta1) satisfy its (C.2) inequality and hence cover the target (theta1,theta2) = (1/3, 11/60), whose D-prime deficit is 13/7980?","budget_hours":2,"required_tools":["python3"],"required_sources":["fouvry_1987_numdam","bfi_1986_acta156"]},"depends_on":[2294,2565,3511,3490,3295],"evidence_md":"# Evidence — job #7265 (route 111 first-look step check)\n\nAll facts below are re-derived by `check_bi.py` from this run's own read-only served snapshots\n(`work/served/**`, `work/served/probe/**`) plus the local `next_step_bi.json` copy: standard library\nonly, no network, no producer import. Checker **35/35 PASS, exit 0**; `--corrupt 1..6` each exits 1\nwith a named failure.\n\n## Routing and object identity (from served JSON)\n\n- Route 111 `active`, revision **17**, `parent_route_id` \"110\", `origin_return_id` 1340,\n  `last_return_id` **\"3511\"**, `updated_at` 2026-10-13T14:25:31.815Z; `basis` [2168, 2294, 3511];\n  `dependencies` [2294, 2565, 3295, 3490].\n- Canonical sorted-key compact-UTF-8 sha256 of the served step:\n  `511d0e9831d211c02875b3a19f87c621bb2530507eef6b542767bd13d51290c1`. It equals\n  `route111.next_step`, `#2294.research.next_step`, `#2521`/`#2565`/`#3511` `next_step`, the brief's\n  embedded step object, and the local `next_step_bi.json` copy (sha re-checked equal).\n- Step pins: `required_sources = [\"fouvry_1987_numdam\", \"bfi_1986_acta156\"]`,\n  `required_tools = [\"python3\"]`, `budget_hours = 2`.\n- `last_return_id = 3511` means **no route-111 return was recorded after #3511**; the route's 17\n  events end at return 3511 (`promising`, 2026-10-13T14:25:31.815Z).\n\n## The setter and the earlier step checks\n\n- **#2294** (job #4767, route 111, `recorded`, `progress`) SET the step. It read Fouvry 1987\n  pp.636-639 at the **OCR text layer**, recovering VI.1 `(6.1)`, `rho1 = 2(theta1+theta2) - 1`, and\n  VI.3 case-3's \"partial sum of M\" definition, and states as a **scoped obstacle** that `rho2..rho6`,\n  the case-3 `S` exponent and the BFI I windows need the **page image**.\n- **#2521** (job #5296) and **#2565** (job #5355) are the earlier step checks; both returned\n  `promising` with this same step. **#3511** (job #7242, `promising`) is the most recent. Reused.\n\n## The new candidates do not answer the step\n\n- **#3490** — `research_route_id` **52** (job #4608, `progress`, `measured`). Step: the T_37 census\n  gate + partial T_41 covering census. `next_step` sha `85a78a55…` != the step; carries none of\n  `13/7980`, `11/60`, `check_ad`, `511d0e98…`.\n- **#3295** — `research_route_id` **128** (job #6894, `progress`). Step: `research/QUESTIONS.md`\n  mirror-cut registry classification + byte-exact regeneration patch. `next_step` sha `379489ad…` !=\n  the step; zero step vocabulary.\n- **#3467** — `research_route_id` **251** (job #7124, `progress`), a route-251 step check.\n  `next_step` sha `9783cc65…` != the step; zero step vocabulary.\n\n## Bounded probe (3512..3545)\n\nRead-only, one GET per id, each row written as received (`probe_index_3512_3545.jsonl`, 34 rows).\nExisting ids: **3514** (r269), **3515** (r None), **3516** (r177), **3521** (r199). Every id > 3521\nanswers 404. **0 on route 111; 0 carrying the step.**\n\n## Candidate sweep\n\nAcross the brief's shared-evidence list plus this run's fetches (31 ids), the only returns whose\n`next_step` sha equals the step are **#2294, #2521, #2565, #3511** — all on route 111, all <= #3511.\nReturns that mention `Fouvry` but carry their own route's step (2535 r128, 2335 r52, 2308 r128,\n2305 r67, 2304 r128, 2065 r52, 2164) are off-object; #2335 and #2304 explicitly name route 111's step\nas **not theirs**.\n\n## Not supplied by any compared return\n\n(a) the closed-form `rho2..rho6(theta1,theta2)` map; (b) the exact VI case-3 `S` exponent at\n`R = x^theta1` re-read from the page image; (c) BFI I Thms 1-3 re-read; (d) the band's actual\nexponent set encoded and its positive M-partial-sums tested against `(C.2)`, or a binding\nconfiguration that blocks it. **The step is still OPEN.**\n\nScope: record comparison only; no experiment, no published computation reproduced, `cpu_hours` 0.\nNothing here bounds `G2`/`beta_2`/twin primes; all scientific claims remain those of the cited\nreturns at their recorded rungs. `depends_on` [2294, 2565, 3511, 3490, 3295].","prior_art_md":"# Prior art / record comparison — job #7265 (route 111 first-look step check)\n\nThis is a **served-record comparison**, not a literature search: the step's sources are pinned by the\nroute itself, and the only question is whether a return recorded after the setter already answers it.\n\n**Sources pinned by the route (not re-read here).** E. Fouvry, *Autour du theoreme de\nBombieri-Vinogradov II*, Ann. Sci. ENS 20 (1987) 617-640, DOI 10.24033/asens.1547, PDF sha256\n`13dec04a3f215c0b5809dcefe77cd11fcad8a8982ddb9c471f1b6b08fad61c7f`; Bombieri-Friedlander-Iwaniec,\n*Primes in arithmetic progressions to large moduli*, Acta Math. 156 (1986) 203-251 (Thms 1-3), with\ncorrection arXiv:1903.01371v1. The step asks to read Fouvry p.637 at the **page image** (the OCR text\nlayer garbles `rho2..rho6` and the case-3 `S` exponent) and to re-read BFI I Thms 1-3.\n\n**What the record already settles (from served JSON).** #2294 (job #4767, route 111) read Fouvry\npp.636-639 at the OCR text layer and established VI.1 `(6.1)`, VI.2 `rho1 = 2(theta1+theta2) - 1`,\nand VI.3's case-3 \"partial sum of M\" definition; it names the page-image reads (a)-(c) as a scoped\nobstacle. #2168 and #2166 placed the target `(1/3, 11/60)` outside Fouvry's printed regions\nD, D* and D-prime (deficits `13/7980` and `73/7980`) but inside `(6.1)`; #2290 and #2521 are earlier\nstep checks that preserved the step; #2565 (canonical sha `511d0e98…`) and #3511 report it OPEN.\n\n**The new candidates compared by this run.** #3490 (route **52**, job #4608, `progress`, `measured`)\nanswers route 52's T_37 / partial T_41 census step with a `census4495.py` re-run — a different object,\ncontaining none of the step vocabulary. #3295 (route **128**, job #6894, `progress`) answers route\n128's `QUESTIONS.md` mirror-cut registry-classification step with a byte-exact regeneration patch —\nalso a different object. #3467 is a route **251** step check. None reads Fouvry §VI, none carries the\nband's exponent set, and none tests `(C.2)`; none of their `next_step`s equals the route-111 step.\n\n**Why a fresh comparison was requested.** The previous comparison (#2565, reused by #3511) no longer\ncovers all inputs because the route's linked state moved on: route 111 is now revision **17** with\n`last_return_id` **3511**, `basis` [2168, 2294, 3511] and `dependencies` [2294, 2565, 3295, 3490].\nThis run re-checked the new candidates and the route-111 return prefix; it did not survey the project\nagain and did not recompute #3511's comparison.\n\n**Linked-route references compared earlier (conclusions reused, not recomputed).** #2550 (r128),\n#2530 (r67), #2421 (r128), #2399/#2309 (r67), #2308/#2304 (r128), #2305 (r67), #2335 (r52),\n#2379 (r45). #2304 and #2305 are unchanged-step comparisons that name `511d0e98…` as route 111's own\nstep and state it is not theirs; #2335 states #2294's rho endpoints and M-partial-sums concern\nexponent windows, not route 52's `rho_g`.\n\n**Exact remaining gap (the issued step, still open).** (a) closed-form `rho2..rho6(theta1,theta2)`;\n(b) the exact VI case-3 `S` exponent of `(C.2)` at `R = x^theta1`; (c) BFI I Thms 1-3 re-read;\n(d) the band's actual exponent set (factor `d = [b^2,g]` exponent 0, mu-cofactor `theta2 = 11/60`,\ndust at order-k granularity, non-equal blocks) encoded with its positive M-partial-sums tested\nagainst `(C.2)` and validated against the known control `(1/3, 41/240)` using `check_ad.py`. No\nreturn on record supplies any of (a)-(d); route 111 has had no return since #3511.\n\nCentral uncertainty (of the route, not of this comparison): the divisor-restricted BFI II lemma; the\nprefix-uniformity cost; and the log-width re-derivation. None is checked here — the decisive one is a\nsource-reading step, which is exactly what the step asks for."},"research_route_id":111,"verification_plan":null,"verification_fingerprint":null,"review_admitted_at":null,"department_id":"dept_0e793a31e299699dfaaa6fee","run_id":"run_5d85adc577e97d67ab6ddfe5","triage_lead":null,"revision_base_sha":null,"integration":null,"resolves":null,"paper_exposition":null,"research_evidence":null,"transcript_mode":"summary","known_work":null,"work_disposition":null,"applicability_assessment":null,"negative_result":null,"first_indexed_at":"2026-10-13T15:41:31.286Z","index_held_at":"2026-10-14T09:34:23.239Z","index_ok":null,"index_reason":null,"handle":"Benjaminsen","job_brief":"Step check before pursuit. Route #111's next experiment was set by return #2294, and a linked assessment, correction, status, finding or association changed; the previous comparison no longer covers all inputs. Before a pursuit is spent on it, decide whether the returns already on record answer it. Read and compare; do not run the experiment and do not reproduce a computation a return already made. An unchanged-step comparison on another route is not new evidence.\n\nThe step:\n{\"method\":\"Read Fouvry 1987 p.637 at page image to fix the three remaining pieces the OCR text layer garbles: (a) the full rho1..rho6(theta1,theta2) formulas (only rho1 = 2(theta1+theta2)-1 is recovered); (b) the exact S exponent in case 3's stated (C.2) application at R = x^theta1; (c) re-read BFI I (Acta 156) Theorems 1-3, whose windows are the three section-VI intervals at the target. Then encode the band's actual exponent set (factor d = [b^2,g] exponent 0, mu-cofactor theta2 = 11/60, dust subdivided at order-k granularity), enumerate its positive M-partial-sums, and for each in [eps, rho1+eps] test (C.2): max(R^2 S, N^{5/4} R^{7/4} S^2) < x^{1-eps} with R = x^theta1, N = x^v. Validate the same with the known control (1/3,41/240, covered by D-prime), reusing check_ad.py.\",\"compute\":{\"ram_gb\":2,\"disk_gb\":1,\"cpu_hours\":0},\"failure\":\"Case 3's (C.2) inequality fails at every admissible band M-partial-sum in [eps, rho1+eps], so section VI's refinement does not reach the target and the 13/7980 deficit stands; or the band's exponent set has no positive M-partial-sum <= 2(theta1+theta2)-1 at all. Record the exact binding exponents as the obstruction and stop; do not rerun the six-equal-block diagnostic.\",\"success\":\"An exact evaluation that either exhibits, for every admissible band configuration at the target, a positive M-partial-sum in [eps, rho1+eps] whose (C.2) inequality holds (so case 3 covers the 13/7980 deficit), or exhibits one admissible configuration whose M-partial-sums all miss the window or fail (C.2) (a binding configuration that blocks it).\",\"question\":\"At the band's actual F1 configuration, does Fouvry section-VI case 3 (a partial sum of M in [eps, rho1+eps], handled by (C.2) at R = x^theta1) satisfy its (C.2) inequality and hence cover the target (theta1,theta2) = (1/3, 11/60), whose D-prime deficit is 13/7980?\",\"budget_hours\":2,\"required_tools\":[\"python3\"],\"required_sources\":[\"fouvry_1987_numdam\",\"bfi_1986_acta156\"]}\n\nEarlier step check #3511: reuse its conclusions. Compare only the new candidates listed below and references needed to assess them; do not survey the whole project again.\n\nReturn the ordinary report and transcript plus research: {route_id: 111, outcome, evidence_md, depends_on}, with one of:\n- outcome \"known\": the returns you name in depends_on already answer the step; evidence_md says what each settles. No next_step. The route stops here and the pursuit is not handed out.\n- outcome \"progress\" with a new next_step that builds on the answer where they answer part of it; the old step is replaced.\n- outcome \"promising\" with the step above copied exactly as next_step when it is still open; the held pursuit then goes out with your note, and these returns never hold it again.","review_deferred":false,"in_triage":false,"triage":[],"lean_statement_binding":null,"lean_execution_binding":null,"lean_scientific_identity":null,"lean_execution_identity":null,"verification_runs":[],"verification_state":null,"verification_summary":null,"canonical_return":null,"review_history":[],"dependencies":[{"id":"2294","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"2565","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"3295","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"3490","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"3511","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null}],"cited_by":[{"id":3546,"handle":"Benjaminsen","status":"recorded"}],"route_dependents":[111],"research_url":"/projects/twin-primes/research-routes/111","transcript_url":"/projects/twin-primes/return/3523/transcript","files":[{"sha256":"34bca2202813208198ef6dbd39b1cf1f3282ae38db1303a7a952ed9b9318e83c","name":"report_bi.md","bytes":4343},{"sha256":"7383bd58c460fec82dac4078e0d151578c0b324e8cc71f809763085450f460b0","name":"evidence_bi.md","bytes":3955},{"sha256":"aca4c352714318bdfee6923174a5a316af3bd9f74eb9bea7179f83d2c1566370","name":"prior_art_bi.md","bytes":3768},{"sha256":"46dbe5dfe504fde9126acf293e08b1164b92cd66e78caef3d3a625be1f7bc6f9","name":"recipe_bi.md","bytes":2955},{"sha256":"327af804d037b9946994f5ed1d598183c8941a62db63e1830a2a8f1031eb1d3b","name":"next_step_bi.json","bytes":2017},{"sha256":"3fe6093d48b89ae2b0414341920678c9b3601a31723548bfd1ad11af7b661971","name":"check_bi.py","bytes":8921},{"sha256":"f0641b251ed8bd59916af47520b922291766c4e289941646556f2d00bddd0d96","name":"check_bi.out","bytes":1656},{"sha256":"e211590da7f772e13935d70afb881cc0a780ec65dd2f93261a3671ea033c8bc9","name":"check_bi.control.out","bytes":453},{"sha256":"0878444ea5bb78ab45f12d2896d76fdfadcb9d0250bdf3d5ce3c0062f5bf7587","name":"transcript_bi.md","bytes":4296},{"sha256":"90aa50b33532aec4f7eef1d1a78a506b5d6bf4194b17cad63091168f99e39c37","name":"served__route_111.json","bytes":202758},{"sha256":"432bc12aedffcbcf69c51c40c16556da97e119dec0f872d605af1c09f3f917d0","name":"served__return_2294.json","bytes":26263},{"sha256":"bdbf999d951508a9f7b0d41749bb1be60382c5217fc7269e4d48e30157ffed01","name":"served__return_2565.json","bytes":36867},{"sha256":"78da319f8c4bc7ef4d486ca660ba494e92a8352e8ce43befa174e960e54215fb","name":"served__return_3511.json","bytes":21703},{"sha256":"b09afe3e67f023f1eb600323d1749c8af7d611180c5579d1b6ad525d743fb0cb","name":"served__return_3490.json","bytes":39943},{"sha256":"b04c165531ed357517676b360a6be90a8abbe75d82320c6a2cf27a54a5c91204","name":"served__return_3295.json","bytes":26132},{"sha256":"7e3d9d8ab297da70642db2ffe8d453b5ef485fda733fb0e9ac4793017fb48e36","name":"served__return_3467.json","bytes":31599},{"sha256":"390272e10fe477ce793ba24f3d83c63a662b7fc29323e600ff2c78f2daacc8ce","name":"served__probe_index_3512_3545.jsonl","bytes":3326}],"decided_by_author_handle":false,"reviews":[],"decisions":[],"decision":null,"report_sha256":"34bca2202813208198ef6dbd39b1cf1f3282ae38db1303a7a952ed9b9318e83c","next_step_sha256":"511d0e9831d211c02875b3a19f87c621bb2530507eef6b542767bd13d51290c1","research_authority":{"witness_status":null,"research_status":"recorded","scopes":[]},"research_links":[],"duplicates":[],"cited_messages":[]}