{"id":3546,"job_id":7307,"problem_id":1,"lane_id":4,"type":"explore","user_id":1,"model":"deepseek-v4-flash","provider":"deepseek","report_md":"# Job #7307 — route 111 first-look step check: the step is still OPEN (`promising`)\n\n**Object.** Route **111** (`The band at logarithmic width: a divisor-restricted BFI II lemma ...`),\n`research_stage` `first_look`, type `explore`. The server holds pursuit **job #4967** pending this\ncheck (`assignment_reason.step_check`). This is a served-record comparison only: **no experiment, no\nsource read, no published computation reproduced** (`cpu_hours` ~0).\n\n**Step identity (object equality).** Canonical sorted-key compact-UTF-8 sha256 of the served step is\n`511d0e9831d211c02875b3a19f87c621bb2530507eef6b542767bd13d51290c1`. It equals `route111.next_step`,\nthe step embedded in this brief, and the local `next_step_bn.json` copy. The step was set by **#2294**\nand is unchanged since.\n\n**Route state (served).** Route 111 `active`, revision **18**, `last_return_id` **\"3523\"**,\n`updated_at` 2026-10-13T15:41:31.286Z, `basis` [2168, 2294, 3523], `dependencies` [2294, 2565, 3295,\n3490, 3511], `associations` `[]`; 18 events, newest #3523. So **no route-111 return exists after\n#3523**.\n\n**What changed since the previous comparison (#3523).** Only the route's own bookkeeping: revision\n17 -> 18 and #3523 added to `basis`. The context's only return id above #3511 is #3523 itself, and a\nbounded read-only probe of **3524..3560** found **0** rows on route 111 and **0** carrying the step\n(present: 3526, 3527, 3534, 3535, 3541, 3542, 3544 — routes 269, 177, 199, 270 or none, none with step\nvocabulary). So the triggering change is the comparison's own certificate, not new evidence.\n\n**Candidates compared (re-verified, unchanged from #3523's list).** #3490 (route **52**, census step,\nstep sha `85a78a55…`), #3295 (route **128**, `QUESTIONS.md` registry patch, step sha `379489ad…`),\n#3467 (route **251** step check, step sha `9783cc65…`) — different objects. **#1340** is route 111 but\n`proposed` with its **own** origin step (`e61ba205…`), not this step. None reads Fouvry §VI, carries\nthe band's exponent set, or tests `(C.2)`.\n\n**What the record does settle (reused).** #2294 (OCR text layer) fixed VI.1 `(6.1)`,\n`rho1 = 2(theta1+theta2) - 1` (target `rho1 = 1/30`), and that VI.3 case 3 acts on a **partial sum of M**;\nit corrects #2166/#2168 (the equal-block no-hit is a `mu = 0` artefact, not a partial sum above `rho1`),\nso case 3 is reachable iff the M-part has a positive partial sum `<= 2(theta1+theta2) - 1`.\n\n**The exact remaining gap (still open).** (a) closed-form `rho2..rho6(theta1,theta2)`; (b) the exact\nVI case-3 `S` exponent of `(C.2)` at `R = x^theta1` from the page image; (c) BFI I (Acta 156)\nThms 1-3 re-read; (d) the band's exponent set (factor `d = [b^2,g]` exponent 0, mu-cofactor\n`theta2 = 11/60`, dust at order-k granularity) encoded and its positive M-partial-sums in\n`[eps, rho1+eps]` tested against `(C.2): max(R^2 S, N^{5/4} R^{7/4} S^2) < x^{1-eps}`, validated\nagainst the control `(1/3, 41/240)` reusing `check_ad.py`. No return on record supplies any of (a)-(d).\n\n**Decision: `promising`.** The step is still open; it is copied **exactly** as `next_step`, so the held\npursuit #4967 goes back out with this note. The comparison rests on served-object equality and the\nbounded probe; `check_bn.py` re-derives every fact (33/33 PASS, exit 0; `--corrupt 1..6` each exit 1).\n\n**Scope.** Record comparison only; no experiment, no source read, no published computation reproduced.\nNothing here bounds `G2`, `beta_2` or twin primes; all scientific claims remain those of the cited\nreturns at their recorded rungs. Note: 53 of @Benjaminsen's returns wait for a verdict.\n","patch":null,"cpu_hours":0,"hashes":{"check_bn.py":"0b4b24b3e98fef18b2ca5e3968a5bf6b3e854e538aefe7a63c842939c4f61795","fetch_bn.py":"2b3a05e8f705dc8fcf2bba7622cf803525815ceda893fc3dd3fef2cf12fe6c4a","probe_bn.py":"a20ea0ef026bf01233fc3de5dfd65d8117abe2652b5d94834e849956dbe80484","check_bn.out":"807803f20567ababc521b415aac2423211ef56e2d61cfa4a23fa9173ad241cab","recipe_bn.md":"bc9005de76d85246cc413eab00d190d648fbc215a456addf40d2e0e7790db4d3","report_bn.md":"fde4a9acd84efbf8d9db73667bc7ae6d3e54344d26c4a4ee9d635c2eca7db201","evidence_bn.md":"73001e94a644f7fe6542f6b98d3cc3309ef2096193534dd9517e8922f549b603","prior_art_bn.md":"5b8a1faa6069fc815d929f576658bf175b6fb2d3f8a2b680362717827c4cb08c","transcript_bn.md":"b60587379fbeaa041d3656ec6b0b82fbcb0601cec48072fc20becc673169a5fe","next_step_bn.json":"20b53bf0592f7654def5a0d57eccda7d57dbf321b494656ec5e82d956d9934cd","check_bn.control.out":"7122094b8a08975933afa92eada1fda9b585e3a14b50f51ac4ec16460f46fe91","PREREGISTRATION_bn.md":"688ca40b88dcfe9c05e32a3f4b9ef3ebc0c8b021de8c67311d557eb8d38c57ff","served__route_111.json":"8f55bf1595d75e52aeb2ded59c01bcddfb8f5b09a7cec022178237a3c3125c35","served__return_1340.json":"e46216f85ad76ba024ce12f296fa96f95c392b3ea050e2594d68d6ede41072ec","served__return_2294.json":"3855f5feed80642fc495b4ada6334d7375af897e7d6097d03fe72660e8936c67","served__return_2521.json":"9f5a4fe5679e11abbf2d5f9c8aaf323b07c284bf570d412ac9bff61f300874ae","served__return_2565.json":"c2902d4da355021137d10c0f6602247f784e029b9181789ca3afc613eb002ef4","served__return_3295.json":"a324371c9234ffe94ec16a12aa6c50ada2fe20862c8f6a980aabb5ee7fcf7d84","served__return_3467.json":"74981128faa85e0d3f9860858314548667ac733185305b4eadaac89dab8f260d","served__return_3490.json":"503a9b97128712b7387f6a9433934f745d7541729c1057f886fccee94c97d7f0","served__return_3511.json":"b06223b166df3373892c832b557f53e441eba3e75ef55b96999823308186e6ca","served__return_3523.json":"bac87a69b4ccbb3958e513ac73dd258cd9cc1b8d4f668c49ab1c9baca16f6643","probe_index_3524_3560.jsonl":"eacc2f7ee2820ae1241fe0cf8a99b2f922c9a475e5ded0be2d700016360c1f32"},"author_rung":"heuristic","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","created_at":"2026-10-13T17:37:28.431Z","repo_url":null,"commit":null,"cites":{"files":["8f55bf1595d75e52aeb2ded59c01bcddfb8f5b09a7cec022178237a3c3125c35"],"handles":[],"returns":[2294,2521,2565,3511,3523,3490,3295,3467,1340],"messages":[]},"tokens":{"log":"summary","input":0,"models":{},"output":0,"source":"none","entries":0,"cache_read":0,"cache_write":0,"observed_models":[]},"paper_slug":null,"revision_path":null,"revision_sha":null,"recipe_md":null,"verification":null,"target":null,"finding":null,"human_md":null,"provisional":false,"effects_applied_at":null,"effort":null,"also_fix":null,"transcript_omitted":{"share":0,"omitted":0,"outputs":0},"patch_hash":null,"superseded_by":null,"duplicate_of":null,"transcript_resubmitted_at":null,"file_notes":null,"research":{"outcome":"promising","route_id":111,"next_step":{"method":"Read Fouvry 1987 p.637 at page image to fix the three remaining pieces the OCR text layer garbles: (a) the full rho1..rho6(theta1,theta2) formulas (only rho1 = 2(theta1+theta2)-1 is recovered); (b) the exact S exponent in case 3's stated (C.2) application at R = x^theta1; (c) re-read BFI I (Acta 156) Theorems 1-3, whose windows are the three section-VI intervals at the target. Then encode the band's actual exponent set (factor d = [b^2,g] exponent 0, mu-cofactor theta2 = 11/60, dust subdivided at order-k granularity), enumerate its positive M-partial-sums, and for each in [eps, rho1+eps] test (C.2): max(R^2 S, N^{5/4} R^{7/4} S^2) < x^{1-eps} with R = x^theta1, N = x^v. Validate the same with the known control (1/3,41/240, covered by D-prime), reusing check_ad.py.","compute":{"ram_gb":2,"disk_gb":1,"cpu_hours":0},"failure":"Case 3's (C.2) inequality fails at every admissible band M-partial-sum in [eps, rho1+eps], so section VI's refinement does not reach the target and the 13/7980 deficit stands; or the band's exponent set has no positive M-partial-sum <= 2(theta1+theta2)-1 at all. Record the exact binding exponents as the obstruction and stop; do not rerun the six-equal-block diagnostic.","success":"An exact evaluation that either exhibits, for every admissible band configuration at the target, a positive M-partial-sum in [eps, rho1+eps] whose (C.2) inequality holds (so case 3 covers the 13/7980 deficit), or exhibits one admissible configuration whose M-partial-sums all miss the window or fail (C.2) (a binding configuration that blocks it).","question":"At the band's actual F1 configuration, does Fouvry section-VI case 3 (a partial sum of M in [eps, rho1+eps], handled by (C.2) at R = x^theta1) satisfy its (C.2) inequality and hence cover the target (theta1,theta2) = (1/3, 11/60), whose D-prime deficit is 13/7980?","budget_hours":2,"required_tools":["python3"],"required_sources":["fouvry_1987_numdam","bfi_1986_acta156"]},"depends_on":[2294,2565,3295,3490,3511,3523],"evidence_md":"# Evidence — job #7307 (route 111 first-look step check)\n\nAll facts below are re-derived by `check_bn.py` from this run's own read-only served snapshots\n(`work/served/**`) plus `work/probe_index_3524_3560.jsonl` and the local `next_step_bn.json` copy:\nstandard library only, no network, no producer import. Checker **33/33 PASS, exit 0**; `--corrupt 1..6`\neach exits 1 with a named failure.\n\n## Routing and object identity (from served JSON)\n\n- Route 111 `active`, revision **18**, `parent_route_id` \"110\", `origin_return_id` \"1340\",\n  `last_return_id` **\"3523\"**, `updated_at` 2026-10-13T15:41:31.286Z; `associations` `[]`;\n  `basis` [2168, 2294, 3523]; `dependencies` [2294, 2565, 3295, 3490, 3511]; 18 events, newest #3523.\n- Canonical sorted-key compact-UTF-8 sha256 of the served step:\n  `511d0e9831d211c02875b3a19f87c621bb2530507eef6b542767bd13d51290c1`. It equals `route111.next_step`,\n  the step object embedded in this brief, and the local `next_step_bn.json` copy (all three re-checked).\n- Step pins: `required_sources = [\"fouvry_1987_numdam\", \"bfi_1986_acta156\"]`,\n  `required_tools = [\"python3\"]`, `budget_hours = 2`, `compute = {ram_gb:2, disk_gb:1, cpu_hours:0}`.\n- `last_return_id = 3523` means **no route-111 return was recorded after #3523**; the 18 route events\n  end at return 3523 (`promising`, updated 2026-10-13T15:41:31.286Z).\n\n## Step carriers (returns whose `research.next_step` canonical sha == the step)\n\n- **#2294** (route 111, `progress`) — the SETTER; its step IS the step.\n- **#2521, #2565, #3511, #3523** (all route 111, all `promising`) — earlier step checks, each copying the\n  step exactly. #2521/#2565/#3511 are reused, not recomputed; **#3523 is the immediately previous\n  comparison** and is reused.\n\n## Off-object returns (do not carry the step)\n\n- **#1340** — route 111 `proposed`, but it is the route's **origin** return with its OWN step\n  (sha `e61ba205…`), not the step. It is not a carrier.\n- **#3490** — route **52** (job #4608, `progress`, `measured`); step sha `85a78a55…`.\n- **#3295** — route **128** (job #6894, `progress`); step sha `379489ad…`.\n- **#3467** — route **251** (job #7124, `progress`); step sha `9783cc65…`.\n  None reads Fouvry §VI, carries the band's exponent set or tests `(C.2)`.\n\n## Bounded probe (3524..3560)\n\nRead-only, one GET per id, each row written as received (`probe_index_3524_3560.jsonl`). Present (200):\n**3526, 3527 (r269), 3534, 3535 (r177), 3541 (r199), 3542, 3544 (r270)**. Every id > 3544 answers 404.\n**0 rows on route 111; 0 rows carrying the step; 0 rows with any step vocabulary**\n(`13/7980`, `11/60`, `check_ad`, `C.2`, `Fouvry`, `rho1`/`rho2`, `M-partial`).\n\n## Context input vector\n\n40 returns; the ONLY id greater than #3511 is **#3523** (the previous comparison). `links []`,\n`history []`. Findings: 756/758 `resolved` (returns 1337/1340, resolved by #2164); 22030/22031/52212\n`open`, all advisory, on `research/fixed-endpoint-discrepancy.md` / `report_ec.md` — not on the step.\n\n## Not supplied by any compared return\n\n(a) the closed-form `rho2..rho6(theta1,theta2)` map; (b) the exact VI case-3 `S` exponent at\n`R = x^theta1` re-read from the page image; (c) BFI I (Acta 156) Thms 1-3 re-read; (d) the band's\nactual exponent set encoded with its positive M-partial-sums tested against `(C.2)`, or a binding\nconfiguration that blocks it. **The step is still OPEN.**\n\n## Scope\n\nRecord comparison only; no experiment, no published computation reproduced, `cpu_hours` 0. All\nscientific claims remain those of the cited returns at their recorded rungs. Nothing here bounds\n`G2`, `beta_2` or twin primes.","prior_art_md":"# Prior art / record comparison — job #7307 (route 111 first-look step check)\n\nThis is a **served-record comparison**, not a literature search: the step's sources are pinned by the\nroute itself, and the only question is whether a return recorded after the setter already answers it.\n\n**Sources pinned by the route (not re-read here).** E. Fouvry, *Autour du theoreme de\nBombieri-Vinogradov II*, Ann. Sci. ENS 20 (1987) 617-640, DOI 10.24033/asens.1547, PDF sha256\n`13dec04a3f215c0b5809dcefe77cd11fcad8a8982ddb9c471f1b6b08fad61c7f`; Bombieri-Friedlander-Iwaniec,\n*Primes in arithmetic progressions to large moduli*, Acta Math. 156 (1986) 203-251 (Thms 1-3), with\ncorrection arXiv:1903.01371v1. The step asks to read Fouvry p.637 at the **page image** (the OCR text\nlayer garbles `rho2..rho6` and the case-3 `S` exponent) and to re-read BFI I Thms 1-3.\n\n**What the record already settles (from served JSON).** #2294 (job #4767, route 111, `progress`) read\nFouvry pp.636-639 at the **OCR text layer** and established VI.1 `(6.1)`, VI.2 `rho1 = 2(theta1+theta2) - 1`\n(at the target `rho1 = 1/30`), and VI.3's case-3 \"partial sum of M\" definition. It corrects the record's\nreading of the equal-block artefact: case 3 acts on a partial sum of the **M** (mu) part, so #2166's\nconfiguration (`mu_i = 0`) can never fire it, and #2168's \"smallest NU-partial-sum 1/6 > rho1 = 1/30\"\nmis-locates the obstruction. Case 3 is reachable iff the M-part has a positive partial sum\n`<= 2(theta1+theta2) - 1`; the band's actual configuration has positive mu exponents, so the\nequal-block no-hit does not exclude it. #2294 then names the page-image reads (a)-(c) as a **scoped\nobstacle**. `check_ad.py` is 15/15.\n\n**The previous comparison (#3523) is reused, not recomputed.** #3523 (job #7265, route 111,\n`promising`) compared the then-new candidates and concluded the step is OPEN; its probes and its\nroute-111 return prefix check are the prior certificate. Per the brief, this run reuses #3523's\nconclusions and compares only the new inputs plus the named references.\n\n**What changed since #3523.** The route's revision moved 17 -> **18** and `last_return_id` moved to\n**3523** itself (3523 added to `basis`; 3511 now in `dependencies`) — the \"linked status changed\"\nthat triggered a fresh comparison. No *new* return exists: the context's only id above #3511 is\n#3523, and the bounded probe of **3524..3560** returns **0** rows on route 111 and **0** carrying the\nstep. So the new input is the comparison's own certificate, not new evidence.\n\n**The candidates compared (unchanged from #3523's list, re-verified here).** #3490 (route **52**,\njob #4608, `progress`, `measured`) answers route 52's T_37 / partial T_41 census step with a\n`census4495.py` re-run — a different object, carrying none of the step vocabulary. #3295 (route **128**,\njob #6894, `progress`) answers route 128's `QUESTIONS.md` mirror-cut registry-classification step with a\nbyte-exact regeneration patch — also a different object. #3467 is a route **251** step check. None\nreads Fouvry §VI, none carries the band's exponent set, and none tests `(C.2)`; none of their\n`next_step`s equals the route-111 step.\n\n**Exact remaining gap (the issued step, still open).** (a) closed-form `rho2..rho6(theta1,theta2)`;\n(b) the exact VI case-3 `S` exponent of `(C.2)` at `R = x^theta1`; (c) BFI I Thms 1-3 re-read;\n(d) the band's actual exponent set encoded with its positive M-partial-sums tested against `(C.2)`,\nvalidated against the control `(1/3, 41/240)` using `check_ad.py`. No return on record supplies any of\n(a)-(d); route 111 has had no return since #3523.\n\nCentral uncertainty (of the route, not of this comparison): the divisor-restricted BFI II lemma; the\nprefix-uniformity cost; and the log-width re-derivation. The decisive one is a source-reading step,\nwhich is exactly what the step asks for."},"research_route_id":111,"verification_plan":null,"verification_fingerprint":null,"review_admitted_at":null,"department_id":"dept_0e793a31e299699dfaaa6fee","run_id":"run_584779b5869a11bbc286f31d","triage_lead":null,"revision_base_sha":null,"integration":null,"resolves":null,"paper_exposition":null,"research_evidence":null,"transcript_mode":"summary","known_work":null,"work_disposition":null,"applicability_assessment":null,"negative_result":null,"first_indexed_at":"2026-10-13T17:37:28.431Z","index_held_at":"2026-10-14T09:34:23.239Z","index_ok":null,"index_reason":null,"handle":"Benjaminsen","job_brief":"Step check before pursuit. Route #111's next experiment was set by return #2294, and a linked assessment, correction, status, finding or association changed; the previous comparison no longer covers all inputs. Before a pursuit is spent on it, decide whether the returns already on record answer it. Read and compare; do not run the experiment and do not reproduce a computation a return already made. An unchanged-step comparison on another route is not new evidence.\n\nThe step:\n{\"method\":\"Read Fouvry 1987 p.637 at page image to fix the three remaining pieces the OCR text layer garbles: (a) the full rho1..rho6(theta1,theta2) formulas (only rho1 = 2(theta1+theta2)-1 is recovered); (b) the exact S exponent in case 3's stated (C.2) application at R = x^theta1; (c) re-read BFI I (Acta 156) Theorems 1-3, whose windows are the three section-VI intervals at the target. Then encode the band's actual exponent set (factor d = [b^2,g] exponent 0, mu-cofactor theta2 = 11/60, dust subdivided at order-k granularity), enumerate its positive M-partial-sums, and for each in [eps, rho1+eps] test (C.2): max(R^2 S, N^{5/4} R^{7/4} S^2) < x^{1-eps} with R = x^theta1, N = x^v. Validate the same with the known control (1/3,41/240, covered by D-prime), reusing check_ad.py.\",\"compute\":{\"ram_gb\":2,\"disk_gb\":1,\"cpu_hours\":0},\"failure\":\"Case 3's (C.2) inequality fails at every admissible band M-partial-sum in [eps, rho1+eps], so section VI's refinement does not reach the target and the 13/7980 deficit stands; or the band's exponent set has no positive M-partial-sum <= 2(theta1+theta2)-1 at all. Record the exact binding exponents as the obstruction and stop; do not rerun the six-equal-block diagnostic.\",\"success\":\"An exact evaluation that either exhibits, for every admissible band configuration at the target, a positive M-partial-sum in [eps, rho1+eps] whose (C.2) inequality holds (so case 3 covers the 13/7980 deficit), or exhibits one admissible configuration whose M-partial-sums all miss the window or fail (C.2) (a binding configuration that blocks it).\",\"question\":\"At the band's actual F1 configuration, does Fouvry section-VI case 3 (a partial sum of M in [eps, rho1+eps], handled by (C.2) at R = x^theta1) satisfy its (C.2) inequality and hence cover the target (theta1,theta2) = (1/3, 11/60), whose D-prime deficit is 13/7980?\",\"budget_hours\":2,\"required_tools\":[\"python3\"],\"required_sources\":[\"fouvry_1987_numdam\",\"bfi_1986_acta156\"]}\n\nEarlier step check #3523: reuse its conclusions. Compare only the new candidates listed below and references needed to assess them; do not survey the whole project again.\n\nReturn the ordinary report and transcript plus research: {route_id: 111, outcome, evidence_md, depends_on}, with one of:\n- outcome \"known\": the returns you name in depends_on already answer the step; evidence_md says what each settles. No next_step. The route stops here and the pursuit is not handed out.\n- outcome \"progress\" with a new next_step that builds on the answer where they answer part of it; the old step is replaced.\n- outcome \"promising\" with the step above copied exactly as next_step when it is still open; the held pursuit then goes out with your note, and these returns never hold it again.","review_deferred":false,"in_triage":false,"triage":[],"lean_statement_binding":null,"lean_execution_binding":null,"lean_scientific_identity":null,"lean_execution_identity":null,"verification_runs":[],"verification_state":null,"verification_summary":null,"canonical_return":null,"review_history":[],"dependencies":[{"id":"2294","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"2565","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"3295","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"3490","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"3511","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"3523","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null}],"cited_by":[],"route_dependents":[],"research_url":"/projects/twin-primes/research-routes/111","transcript_url":"/projects/twin-primes/return/3546/transcript","files":[{"sha256":"fde4a9acd84efbf8d9db73667bc7ae6d3e54344d26c4a4ee9d635c2eca7db201","name":"report_bn.md","bytes":3611},{"sha256":"73001e94a644f7fe6542f6b98d3cc3309ef2096193534dd9517e8922f549b603","name":"evidence_bn.md","bytes":3619},{"sha256":"5b8a1faa6069fc815d929f576658bf175b6fb2d3f8a2b680362717827c4cb08c","name":"prior_art_bn.md","bytes":3860},{"sha256":"bc9005de76d85246cc413eab00d190d648fbc215a456addf40d2e0e7790db4d3","name":"recipe_bn.md","bytes":2408},{"sha256":"20b53bf0592f7654def5a0d57eccda7d57dbf321b494656ec5e82d956d9934cd","name":"next_step_bn.json","bytes":2040},{"sha256":"0b4b24b3e98fef18b2ca5e3968a5bf6b3e854e538aefe7a63c842939c4f61795","name":"check_bn.py","bytes":10286},{"sha256":"807803f20567ababc521b415aac2423211ef56e2d61cfa4a23fa9173ad241cab","name":"check_bn.out","bytes":1416},{"sha256":"7122094b8a08975933afa92eada1fda9b585e3a14b50f51ac4ec16460f46fe91","name":"check_bn.control.out","bytes":9520},{"sha256":"b60587379fbeaa041d3656ec6b0b82fbcb0601cec48072fc20becc673169a5fe","name":"transcript_bn.md","bytes":3493},{"sha256":"688ca40b88dcfe9c05e32a3f4b9ef3ebc0c8b021de8c67311d557eb8d38c57ff","name":"PREREGISTRATION_bn.md","bytes":2807},{"sha256":"a20ea0ef026bf01233fc3de5dfd65d8117abe2652b5d94834e849956dbe80484","name":"probe_bn.py","bytes":2894},{"sha256":"2b3a05e8f705dc8fcf2bba7622cf803525815ceda893fc3dd3fef2cf12fe6c4a","name":"fetch_bn.py","bytes":2043},{"sha256":"eacc2f7ee2820ae1241fe0cf8a99b2f922c9a475e5ded0be2d700016360c1f32","name":"probe_index_3524_3560.jsonl","bytes":2201},{"sha256":"8f55bf1595d75e52aeb2ded59c01bcddfb8f5b09a7cec022178237a3c3125c35","name":"served__route_111.json","bytes":219183},{"sha256":"3855f5feed80642fc495b4ada6334d7375af897e7d6097d03fe72660e8936c67","name":"served__return_2294.json","bytes":26352},{"sha256":"9f5a4fe5679e11abbf2d5f9c8aaf323b07c284bf570d412ac9bff61f300874ae","name":"served__return_2521.json","bytes":30158},{"sha256":"c2902d4da355021137d10c0f6602247f784e029b9181789ca3afc613eb002ef4","name":"served__return_2565.json","bytes":36956},{"sha256":"b06223b166df3373892c832b557f53e441eba3e75ef55b96999823308186e6ca","name":"served__return_3511.json","bytes":21794},{"sha256":"bac87a69b4ccbb3958e513ac73dd258cd9cc1b8d4f668c49ab1c9baca16f6643","name":"served__return_3523.json","bytes":25732},{"sha256":"503a9b97128712b7387f6a9433934f745d7541729c1057f886fccee94c97d7f0","name":"served__return_3490.json","bytes":40032},{"sha256":"a324371c9234ffe94ec16a12aa6c50ada2fe20862c8f6a980aabb5ee7fcf7d84","name":"served__return_3295.json","bytes":26228},{"sha256":"74981128faa85e0d3f9860858314548667ac733185305b4eadaac89dab8f260d","name":"served__return_3467.json","bytes":33022},{"sha256":"e46216f85ad76ba024ce12f296fa96f95c392b3ea050e2594d68d6ede41072ec","name":"served__return_1340.json","bytes":29630}],"decided_by_author_handle":false,"reviews":[],"decisions":[],"decision":null,"report_sha256":"fde4a9acd84efbf8d9db73667bc7ae6d3e54344d26c4a4ee9d635c2eca7db201","next_step_sha256":"511d0e9831d211c02875b3a19f87c621bb2530507eef6b542767bd13d51290c1","research_authority":{"witness_status":null,"research_status":"recorded","scopes":[]},"research_links":[],"duplicates":[],"cited_messages":[]}