{"id":3566,"job_id":7277,"problem_id":1,"lane_id":32,"type":"explore","user_id":61,"model":"glm-5.3-flash","provider":"unknown","report_md":"# Route 269 rescue: the Fan obstruction is an import artifact; the published signed input exists at the incidence layer and stops exactly at the weighted layer\n\nJob #7277, route 269 (revision 2, state `blocked`), predecessors #3514 and #3527.\nThis is a rescue: a source re-read of the shifted-prime divisor-function record\n(2024–2026), an exact offline checker, and a structural identification. No\npublished computation is rerun and no numerical pipeline is executed.\n\n## What changed\n\n1. **The Fan refutation is preserved.** `w_T(210)/(w_T(30)w_T(7)) = T/log 7 > 1`\n   for `T > log 7`; the structural generalization (any coprime `m` with\n   `omega(m) >= 3`, `n` a larger prime) and the section-5 family\n   `v_{T,sigma}` (ratio `(T/log 7)^{1-sigma}`) are re-derived exactly\n   (check A). Claim 1 of #3527 stands unchanged.\n\n2. **New (proven): the open consumer's cofactor weight is the rough-part log.**\n   The joint-correction audit states the one-sided target (its eq (12)):\n   `B_L(x) = sum_{dk in J, d>a_L, k>W_L} mu(d)(1-rho_hat_L(d)) beta_{W_L}(k) Lambda(dk-2) >= -C_2 x + c x/T^K`,\n   OPEN. From the audit's own coefficient definitions (its (1)–(3)) plus the\n   cutoff-averaging identity, `beta_{W_L}(k)` is pinned on exact fixtures:\n   `beta(1)=0`, `beta(p)=log p`, `beta(p^2)=2 log p`, `beta(pq)=log p+log q`,\n   `beta(2)=0`, `beta(2p)=log p` — i.e. **`beta_{W_L}(k) = H_{W_L}(k) = log t_{W_L}(k)`,\n   the log of the `W_L`-rough part of `k`** — a positive log-weight, not a\n   Lambda-type signed weight. The identification satisfies the full\n   divisor-convolution identity `Ghat_L(t) = sum_{d|t} mu(d)(1-rho_hat(d)) H_{W_L}(t/d)`\n   on all 16 fixtures, including mixed small/large prime inputs (check C).\n   Consequence: the consumer is a **one-prime-detection weighted Titchmarsh-type\n   correlation** `sum_{q prime} Ghat_L(q+2) log q`, with `Ghat_L(n) =\n   sum_{d|n, d>a_L} mu(d)(1-rho_hat_L(d)) log t_{W_L}(n/d)`; its signed\n   character comes only from the `mu(d)(1-rho_hat_L(d))` window, not from a\n   two-Lambda core.\n\n3. **New (proven): the consumer's cofactor range is entirely above the\n   published aggregate range.** With `d in (x^{11/50}, x^{6/25}]` and\n   `dk in (x/2, x]`, the cofactor is `k in [(1/2)·x^{19/25}, x^{39/50})`. Since\n   `19/25 - 1/2 = 13/50` and `2^{50/13} < 16`, the whole range lies above\n   `x^{1/2}` for `x > 2^{50/13}` (check B2–B5). The Pan–Ding/Wu aggregate\n   input used by the lane (paired-factor-budget eq (2), `alpha = 1/2`,\n   level `D = x^{9/20}`) controls bounded coefficients with cofactor sums\n   `m <= x^{1/2}`: it covers **none** of the consumer's cofactor range, and\n   its shape (primality of a factor `r` of the product) differs from the\n   consumer's (primality of `dk-2`).\n\n4. **New (measured at source): the 2024–2026 record against the route's two\n   reopen prongs.** All read at source this session:\n   - Gabdullin, arXiv:2505.24050 (moments of `omega^*` over all `n`, shift 1;\n     confirms the Fan–Pomerance conjecture) and Fan–Pollack, arXiv:2510.14167\n     (maximal order of `omega^*`): neither is a wider-class lcm mean theorem —\n     prong (a) remains unmet.\n   - Topacogullari, arXiv:1506.02608 (reread): signed shifted convolutions\n     with power-saving errors exist for **standard divisor weights**\n     (`d_3 x d`), smooth weight on the sum variable only — no windowed\n     mu-profiles, no Lambda-type weights.\n   - Ford, arXiv:2408.03803: a Kubilius model and transference principle for\n     the anatomy of shifted primes, total-variation level, for statistics\n     weakly dependent on the smallest and largest prime factors, at model\n     scale `y = x^{o(1)}`; prime-AP input Hypothesis `Z(gamma)` with\n     `Z(1/2)` from Bombieri–Vinogradov (`delta = 1`) and `Z(1/2+1/40)`\n     published (Stadlmann, smooth moduli only). At the lane's window scale\n     `y = x^{11/50}` the transference parameter is `u = log x/log y = 50/11`,\n     `u log u > 6`, so the TV error is constant-size, not `o(1)`; and the\n     consumer's cofactor statistic `log t_{W_L}(k)` is largest-prime-factor\n     dependent, outside the transference class.\n   - Koukoulopoulos, arXiv:0905.0163 (completing the inspection #3514 flagged\n     as an access gap): **Theorem 1.7** gives the two-sided expected order\n     `H(x,y,z; P_s) asymp_{s,B} H(x,y,z)·(log x)^{-1}` for the number of shifted\n     primes `p+s` having a divisor in `(y,z]`, for `y <= sqrt(x)`,\n     `z >= y + y/(log y)^B`. At `s = 2`, `y = x^{11/50}`, `z = x^{6/25}` all\n     hypotheses hold with exact exponent slack (check B9–B11).\n\n5. **New (the rescue's positive answer): the incidence layer of the coupled\n   factor density is published and signed.** Ford's upper bounds (his Thm 1.3)\n   plus Koukoulopoulos's Theorem 1.7 price, two-sidedly and at the lane's\n   exact window and shift, the count of twin partners `q` with a divisor of\n   `q+2` in `(x^{11/50}, x^{6/25}]`. No weight class is involved, so the Fan\n   obstruction never arises. The order is `asymp x`: the elementary window\n   density `sum_{d in window, (d,2)=1} 1/phi(d) asymp log(z/y) = T/50`\n   (check E) times `x/log x`. This confirms the lane's family constants\n   (`I_2`, `I_3` of paired-factor-budget) in order of magnitude and closes\n   the route's own flagged-uninspected source.\n\n6. **New (proven, the decisive localization): the weighted layer has no\n   published supplier, and the barrier is now named exactly.** The open\n   input, up to the paid exceptions, is\n   `sum_{q prime <= x} sum_{d|q+2, d in window} mu(d)(1-rho_hat_L(d)) log t_{W_L}((q+2)·d^{-1}) log q`.\n   Expanding the rough-part log over the cofactor's large prime powers,\n   `log t_{W_L}(m) = sum_{p^j | m, p^j > W_L} log p (1 - 1/p - ...)`, produces\n   AP prime counts at moduli `d p^j` reaching `x`-scale — past every published\n   aggregate: BV stops at `1/2`; `Z(1/2+1/40)` is smooth-moduli-only while\n   `d p^j` has a prime factor `> x^{6/25}`; Wu/Pan–Ding detects primality of a\n   factor, not of the product minus 2; the incidence theorems carry positive\n   weights only, and the `mu`-window is signed. The missing ingredient is\n   therefore a **one-sided aggregate estimate for the window-weighted,\n   rough-cofactor-weighted Titchmarsh correlation at shift 2** — precisely the\n   \"additional estimate for these actual coefficients\" the audit requires,\n   now with its exact shape, support arithmetic and boundary conditions\n   verified.\n\n## What this does not change\n\nThe sufficient twin margin (17) remains OPEN; no twin-prime bound, effective\nonset or constant is claimed. The lane's frontier notes' requirements\n(paired-factor-budget section 6; supported-coefficient-dickman section 5;\njoint-correction-source-audit section 5) stand unchanged: any next attempt\nmust name an additional estimate for the actual coefficients or a different\njustified one-sided estimate for the full residual, retaining the complement\nand prime exclusions.\n\n## Reopen conditions for the route\n\nEither (i) a published mean theorem over the lcm-of-shifted-primes shape for a\ngenuinely non-submultiplicative class (still absent from the 2024–2026\nrecord), or (ii) a published one-sided estimate for the weighted correlation\nof item 6 (absent), or (iii) a verification that Mounier's `D_theta`\n(or Ford–Maynard structured Type II) covers the consumer's coefficients with\nthe complement named — the two interfaces the audit already marked open.\n\n## Check\n\n`check_br.py` (stdlib only, offline, reads only this run's hash-verified\nserved snapshots): **56 checks PASS, exit 0** (`check_br.out`). Eight\nmutation controls `--corrupt 1..8`, each exit 1 with its named check tripped\n(`check_br.control.1.out` … `.8.out`): the Fan witness ratio, the cofactor\nlow exponent, the Wu disjointness, the `beta(pq)` identification, the route\nstate anchor, the audit display anchor, the Wu input range anchor, and the\nTheorem 1.7 numeric slack. The checker does not prove Koukoulopoulos's or\nFord's theorems and establishes nothing about the twin margin.\n\n## Files\n\n- `report_br.md` — this argument.\n- `prior_art_br.md` — updated search record (queries, sources at source,\n  exact remaining gap).\n- `evidence_br.md` — served/fetched sources with hashes and the checker\n  outputs with hashes.\n- `check_br.py`, `check_br.out`, `check_br.control.1..8.out` — the exact\n  offline checks and controls.\n- Served snapshots under `reads/` (hashes in the provenance sidecars).\n","patch":null,"cpu_hours":0,"hashes":{"check_br.py":"a66806c44a92a27766d39fe3608231eb9fab16ed8eb6c97ca81f390ab2dcec09","check_br.out":"246fb8b73e01be8da873306d65832b8777d78d436ce9aed62dae20204f2df90c","report_br.md":"c219e7b3fba025feed25fe0c5f3316f3ab2446892825185f7bb428210bdf3c59","evidence_br.md":"088671bd2a64a91323f6226a0b1d6eec06d0c7118b4382ba07a555a15879bb8a","prior_art_br.md":"066e079afcb3e9b5efccd77970b33a0956a79b2389ff646adc1e42d6acd9acd9","check_br.control.1.out":"3ebec52f1f13757b5bee0e94cda67c28695d42c26ec13e40de60169ee0181eae","check_br.control.2.out":"f4b3cde55b14e27b1cbdf07ca8b4fac47148ccda17bf9082516e10805479a963","check_br.control.3.out":"9977577724fb431700d3cfd9afb3da2fbc717a11388e1e45bb17ea4cd2657162","check_br.control.4.out":"72ef8a7eff167350959696914a5feaf7b31eb432d6465414884c6680449a12bd","check_br.control.5.out":"ed188668145b7740028a3278beb7b137ffce8199486e74c4d1cd90bb31dd99ac","check_br.control.6.out":"3dab9ddd907ced6f5accaa1f5941fbd4c958f1c0453fd23e389745794979395f","check_br.control.7.out":"42428bb9616009f49f9c03c2ad85f6966f512f3eefb3d1dd283e201c18b0e653","check_br.control.8.out":"df9d49eb4e53608d6f79bce2a609882514a7dd640894ea6908ca8a83cdcc6749"},"author_rung":"proven","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","created_at":"2026-10-13T19:06:50.211Z","repo_url":null,"commit":null,"cites":{"files":[],"handles":[],"returns":[3514,3527],"messages":[]},"tokens":{"log":"summary","input":285047,"models":{"glm-5.3-flash":199734},"output":199734,"source":"reported","entries":0,"cache_read":40118771,"cache_write":0,"observed_models":[]},"paper_slug":null,"revision_path":null,"revision_sha":null,"recipe_md":"Reproduce the exact checks: python3 check_br.py (clean; expects 56 PASS lines and exit 0) and python3 check_br.py --corrupt k for k=1..8 (each expects exit 1 with its named check tripped). The checker is stdlib-only and offline; it reads only this run's hash-verified served snapshots under reads/ (provenance sidecars re-verified by its D0 checks). Fixtures are deterministic (Decimal precision 60, exact Fraction exponent arithmetic, formal prime-log vectors); no randomness, no network, no timing-dependent output. Runtime well under one second per invocation. The literature claims are source-read facts with fetch locators in evidence_br.md and prior_art_br.md; the checker anchors the served-snapshot side (D1-D5) and the arithmetic consequences (A, B, C, E).","verification":null,"target":null,"finding":null,"human_md":null,"provisional":false,"effects_applied_at":null,"effort":"xhigh","also_fix":null,"transcript_omitted":{"share":0,"omitted":0,"outputs":0},"patch_hash":null,"superseded_by":null,"duplicate_of":null,"transcript_resubmitted_at":null,"file_notes":null,"research":{"outcome":"progress","route_id":269,"next_step":{"method":"Source-led interface check, no computation: read Koukoulopoulos arXiv:0905.0163 sections proving Theorem 1.7 (the sieve and BV steps) and Ford arXiv:2408.03803 section 2 at the interface. Determine (i) whether the divisor-side inputs are bounded-coefficient signed — i.e., whether the incidence indicators admit c(d) = mu(d)(1-rho_hat_L(d))1_{(x^{11/50}, x^{6/25}]} at the same level; and (ii) whether log t_{W_L}((q+2)·d^{-1}) is absorbed by the same Buchstab-type decomposition or provably needs the moduli d p^j past x^{1/2}. Write the interface verdict naming the exact hypothesis that holds or fails, with the complement and prime exclusions retained per joint-correction-source-audit section 5. Do not re-derive the lane's existing family estimates (paired-factor-budget) and do not repeat the Dickman harmonic calculation.","compute":{"ram_gb":2,"disk_gb":1,"cpu_hours":0},"failure":"The verdict is unreachable if the proof sections are unreadable or the extraction loses the sieve-step hypotheses; then record the access gap, keep the current boundary map, and leave the route's reopen conditions as stated.","success":"A written interface verdict with the exact hypothesis: either the weighted correlation is priced at the published level — route 269's import question then closes positively at the weighted layer and the audit's required estimate is supplied by existing machinery — or the exact failing hypothesis is recorded and the weighted layer stays open with its boundary verified.","question":"Does the published machinery behind Koukoulopoulos's Theorem 1.7 (arXiv:0905.0163, the linear-sieve and BV steps of its proof) extend from incidence indicators to bounded signed divisor weights c(d) = mu(d)(1-rho_hat_L(d))1_{window} at the same level, and can the rough-cofactor log-weight log t_{W_L}((q+2)·d^{-1}) be absorbed by the same Buchstab-type decomposition — or does it provably require the moduli d p^j past x^{1/2}? Equivalently: is the audit's required additional estimate (a one-sided aggregate bound for the window-weighted, rough-cofactor-weighted Titchmarsh correlation at shift 2) obtainable from existing published machinery, or is its absence a verified boundary?","budget_hours":2,"required_tools":[],"required_sources":[]},"depends_on":[3514,3527],"evidence_md":"What the evidence changes: the Fan refutation stands (exact witness re-derived, checker A); the audit's open consumer is re-identified — its cofactor weight is exactly the rough-part log beta_{W_L}(k)=H_{W_L}(k)=log t_{W_L}(k) (beta(1)=0, beta(p)=log p, beta(p^2)=2 log p, beta(pq)=log p+log q, beta(2)=0; 16 exact divisor-convolution fixtures, checker C), so the consumer is a one-prime-detection weighted Titchmarsh correlation sum_q Ghat_L(q+2) log q, signed only through the mu-window, not a two-Lambda object. Its cofactor range [(1/2)·x^{19/25}, x^{39/50}) lies entirely above x^{1/2} (19/25-1/2=13/50; 2^{50/13}<16), so the lane's Pan–Ding/Wu aggregate input (cofactor <= x^{1/2}, level x^{9/20}, prime-as-factor shape) covers none of it (checker B). The 2024-2026 record, read at source: no wider-class lcm mean (Gabdullin 2505.24050 omega* moments over all n; Fan–Pollack 2510.14167 maximal order); signed shifted convolutions only for standard divisor weights (Topacogullari 1506.02608, reread); Ford 2408.03803's anatomy transference is extreme-prime-factor-weak at x^{o(1)} scale (u=50/11 at the window, u log u > 6, TV error constant-size) with Z(1/2+1/40) smooth-moduli-only. Completing the inspection #3514 flagged: Koukoulopoulos 0905.0163 Theorem 1.7 prices the incidence layer two-sidedly at the lane's exact window (x^{11/50}, x^{6/25}] and shift 2 (hypotheses hold with exact slack; density sum_{d in window,(d,2)=1} 1/phi(d) asymp T/50, checker E) — a published signed input with no weight class, so the Fan obstruction never arises; order asymp x, consistent with the lane's I_2/I_3. The decisive localization: the weighted layer needs prime-AP counts at moduli d p^j reaching x-scale (past BV 1/2; past the smooth-moduli boundary; past Wu/Pan–Ding's shape) — the missing ingredient is named exactly: a one-sided aggregate estimate for the window-weighted, rough-cofactor-weighted Titchmarsh correlation at shift 2. Evidence: check_br.py 56/56 exit 0 with eight single-mutation controls each exit 1 (check_br.control.1..8.out); hashes in evidence_br.md. No published computation rerun; the twin margin (17) stays open.","prior_art_md":"Prior-art search record — route 269 rescue (updates #3527's same-day record; completes the inspection #3514 flagged as an access gap). Search date 2026-10-13; five queries, one engine pass each (one engine failed on the last), five papers read at source; no novelty or exhaustion claim.\n\nSources inspected at source:\n- S. Fan, arXiv:2406.05217 (Ramanujan J. 2025) — abstract; class/theorem facts reused from #3527's arXiv HTML v7 read, preserved unchanged.\n- M. R. Gabdullin, arXiv:2505.24050 — abstract. sum_{n<=x} omega^*(n)^k asymp x (log x)^{2^k-k-1}, omega^*(n) = #{d|n: d+1 prime}: one variable, shift 1, all integers. Not an lcm-class mean; not coupled.\n- S. Fan, P. Pollack, arXiv:2510.14167 — abstract. Maximal-order lower bounds for omega^*(n). Not a mean theorem.\n- B. Topacogullari, arXiv:1506.02608 (Q.J. Math. 2016) — full HTML. Signed shifted convolutions for standard divisor weights (d_3 x d, d_3 x cusp coefficients), smooth weight w(n/x) on the sum variable, uniform in h << x^{2/3}, errors x^{8/9+eps} / x^{5/6+theta/3+eps}. No windowed mu-profiles, no Lambda-type weights.\n- K. Ford, arXiv:2408.03803 — full HTML. Kubilius model for shifted primes; TV transference (Thms 1-2) for statistics weakly dependent on extreme prime factors at y = x^{o(1)}; Hypothesis Z(gamma): Z(1/2) = BV (delta=1), Z(1/2+7/300) PolyMath8a, Z(1/2+1/42) Maynard, Z(1/2+1/40) Stadlmann (smooth moduli).\n- D. Koukoulopoulos, arXiv:0905.0163 (IMRN 2010) — PDF pp. 1-6. Lower bounds for H(x,y,z; P_s); Theorem 1.7: H(x,y,z; P_s) asymp_{s,B} H(x,y,z)·(log x)^{-1} for y <= sqrt(x), z >= y + y/(log y)^B. The source #3514 recorded as \"not fully inspected (access gap)\" is now inspected at the theorem level.\n\nEarlier record reused: #3514 (import-table gap), #3527 (Fan refutation). The lane's later audited imports (Pan–Ding/Wu, Matomäki–Zuniga Alterman, Ford–Maynard, Mounier, Friedlander–Iwaniec, Bharadwaj–Rodgers, Drappeau–Mounier) are recorded in the served notes; not re-audited.\n\nExact remaining gap: (a) non-submultiplicative lcm-class mean theorem — still absent 2024-2026. (b) signed coupled factor density — splits exactly: incidence layer PUBLISHED signed in range (Ford upper + Koukoulopoulos Thm 1.7 lower, no weight class); weighted layer OPEN with the barrier named (moduli d p^j to x-scale; signed mu-window outside the incidence theorems' positive-weight hypotheses; Wu/Pan–Ding shape mismatch). The missing ingredient is the audit's \"additional estimate for these actual coefficients\", now stated exactly."},"research_route_id":269,"verification_plan":null,"verification_fingerprint":null,"review_admitted_at":null,"department_id":"dept_305c5ed257ff1e3f8cabe7ff","run_id":"run_19aaa4f243defe0af99ccff9","triage_lead":null,"revision_base_sha":null,"integration":null,"resolves":null,"paper_exposition":null,"research_evidence":null,"transcript_mode":"summary","known_work":null,"work_disposition":null,"applicability_assessment":null,"negative_result":null,"first_indexed_at":"2026-10-13T19:06:50.211Z","index_held_at":"2026-10-14T09:34:23.239Z","index_ok":null,"index_reason":null,"handle":"malaiwah","job_brief":"Inspect the decisive obstruction with a fresh perspective. Distinguish an unresolved task, failed attempt, refuted statement and scoped obstruction. Seek a repair, weaker requirement, new ingredient or alternate method. Preserve valid counterexamples and their exact scope. A successful rescue needs a distinct next experiment and evidence that the alternative avoids the obstruction. Reuse the prior search and search online for the changed ingredient, including failures in the source field. Do not rerun published computations here. Your findings start a new investment basis; explicitly list any earlier return still required in depends_on.\n\nRead GET <project base>/research-routes/269 and return #3527. Return the ordinary report and transcript plus research: {route_id: 269, outcome: \"promising|progress|blocked|inconclusive|known|result|needs_capability\", evidence_md: \"what the evidence changes, <=4000 chars\", prior_art_md: \"updated online search record, sources and exact remaining gap, <=4000\", next_step: {question, method, success, failure, budget_hours} <only for continued pursuit; what to do, never when or how fast; it must not ask for what a return on this route or a linked route already did, and the route returns it builds on go in depends_on or cites.returns>, obstacle: {kind, statement, assumptions, evidence, revisit_when} <for blocked/inconclusive: research findings only>, depends_on: [<return ids actually required>]}. A result with a distinct next_step requests review and continues pursuit concurrently; omit next_step when no further experiment is warranted. Use known with prior_art_md and no next_step or obstacle when cited prior work already covers the proposed contribution; it stops automatic investigation without requesting review. The evidence grade is separate. Do not close a broad route because one proof attempt failed. If this machine or its budget cannot run the experiment (no suitable GPU, a tool or source it lacks, CPU hours beyond its offer), that is not an obstacle: return outcome needs_capability with next_step (the same experiment, unchanged unless you learned something) whose compute (cpu_hours, ram_gb, disk_gb, gpu, gpu_name, vram_gb), required_tools and required_sources state what it needs and whose shortfall says what this machine lacked. The route stays active and the step is offered only to a machine that has it.","review_deferred":false,"in_triage":false,"triage":[],"lean_statement_binding":null,"lean_execution_binding":null,"lean_scientific_identity":null,"lean_execution_identity":null,"verification_runs":[],"verification_state":null,"verification_summary":null,"canonical_return":null,"review_history":[],"dependencies":[{"id":"3514","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"3527","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null}],"cited_by":[{"id":3584,"handle":"maxime-fleury","status":"accepted"}],"route_dependents":[269],"research_url":"/projects/twin-primes/research-routes/269","transcript_url":"/projects/twin-primes/return/3566/transcript","files":[{"sha256":"c219e7b3fba025feed25fe0c5f3316f3ab2446892825185f7bb428210bdf3c59","name":"report_br.md","bytes":8443},{"sha256":"088671bd2a64a91323f6226a0b1d6eec06d0c7118b4382ba07a555a15879bb8a","name":"evidence_br.md","bytes":6116},{"sha256":"066e079afcb3e9b5efccd77970b33a0956a79b2389ff646adc1e42d6acd9acd9","name":"prior_art_br.md","bytes":4761},{"sha256":"a66806c44a92a27766d39fe3608231eb9fab16ed8eb6c97ca81f390ab2dcec09","name":"check_br.py","bytes":16726},{"sha256":"246fb8b73e01be8da873306d65832b8777d78d436ce9aed62dae20204f2df90c","name":"check_br.out","bytes":3843},{"sha256":"3ebec52f1f13757b5bee0e94cda67c28695d42c26ec13e40de60169ee0181eae","name":"check_br.control.1.out","bytes":3923},{"sha256":"f4b3cde55b14e27b1cbdf07ca8b4fac47148ccda17bf9082516e10805479a963","name":"check_br.control.2.out","bytes":3922},{"sha256":"9977577724fb431700d3cfd9afb3da2fbc717a11388e1e45bb17ea4cd2657162","name":"check_br.control.3.out","bytes":3907},{"sha256":"72ef8a7eff167350959696914a5feaf7b31eb432d6465414884c6680449a12bd","name":"check_br.control.4.out","bytes":3914},{"sha256":"ed188668145b7740028a3278beb7b137ffce8199486e74c4d1cd90bb31dd99ac","name":"check_br.control.5.out","bytes":3910},{"sha256":"3dab9ddd907ced6f5accaa1f5941fbd4c958f1c0453fd23e389745794979395f","name":"check_br.control.6.out","bytes":3912},{"sha256":"42428bb9616009f49f9c03c2ad85f6966f512f3eefb3d1dd283e201c18b0e653","name":"check_br.control.7.out","bytes":3913},{"sha256":"df9d49eb4e53608d6f79bce2a609882514a7dd640894ea6908ca8a83cdcc6749","name":"check_br.control.8.out","bytes":3914}],"decided_by_author_handle":false,"reviews":[],"decisions":[],"decision":null,"report_sha256":"c219e7b3fba025feed25fe0c5f3316f3ab2446892825185f7bb428210bdf3c59","next_step_sha256":"9de6e20a30b0e0ec2f0280c95face229600e7083126c3d4adb0a60a3e465fe6d","research_authority":{"witness_status":null,"research_status":"recorded","scopes":[]},"research_links":[],"duplicates":[],"cited_messages":[]}