{"id":3613,"job_id":7461,"problem_id":1,"lane_id":4,"type":"explore","user_id":1,"model":"deepseek-v4-flash","provider":"deepseek","report_md":"# Route 31 step check (job #7461): the held step is still open — the returns recorded after it leave it undone, so the outcome is `promising` with the step copied exactly\n\nJob #7461 (explore, first look, lane `measure`, route **31**, general mode), local run\n`run-2026-10-14-bu`. Read-and-compare only: **no experiment was run, no number was recomputed, no\nproducer was imported** (`cpu_hours 0`).\n\n## What was asked\n\nRoute 31's held step (set by **#2683**) is a step check before pursuit: decide whether the returns\nrecorded after #2683, on route 31 or a route linked to it, already **answer** the step. The step\nitself is a measurement instrument: reuse the draws already computed (#2459's device, D = 2000, 3\ncases × 3 seeds, matched-normaliser), **replace the per-cell raw leave-one-out-maximum branch with the\nresolution-corrected p-value** `p_res = (1 + #{i: |z_i| >= |z_m|})/(1 + D)` of the matched thinning cloud\n`T_match`, pre-register **one pooled decision statistic** over the nine cell-cases (e.g. Fisher\ncombination, or the minimum `p_res` with a multiplicity rule) and a single alpha written before the\nnumber is read; report each cell's `p_res`, the pooled statistic and the canonical-D=200 anchoring\ngate; add no draws and do not rebuild the registered occupancy-preserving control (#2348).\n\nRecorded after #2683, the check lists exactly two comparison returns, both on route **184**:\n**#3473** (recorded 2026-10-13, `accepted`, `measured`) and **#2922** (recorded 2026-10-11,\n`recorded`). Outcomes are `known` (they answer it), `progress` (they answer part and a new step\nreplaces it), or `promising` (it is still open — the step is copied back exactly).\n\n## Result\n\n**No return on record answers the step; no route-31 return exists after #2683.** The served route\nrecord `GET /research-routes/31` is `state:\"active\"`, revision 25, `last_return_id 2683`, and its\nnewest event **is** the setter #2683 — route 31's own history stops at the step. The two comparison\nreturns are route-184 records and both explicitly leave route 31's work undone:\n\n- **#3473** lists \"route 31's queued work\" among what it *deliberately did not do*: \"**Deliberately\n  not done:** #2459's matched-normaliser device over the anchored set (route 31's queued work),\n  #2348's anchored values, any census.\" It is route 184's Phase-0/Phase-1 result and does not execute\n  the pooled `p_res` statistic.\n- **#2922** is a route-184 step check whose own summary records that route 31's D-stable rerun is\n  **held, not done** — \"route 31's job #5588 holds the D-stable rerun\" — and that the\n  occupancy-preserving control is unbuilt and now *more* necessary. It answers route 184's step and\n  half of a route-31-adjacent reading, never route 31's step.\n\nThe step setter itself cannot be its own answer: #2683 only *names* the resolution-corrected\n`p_res` and reports a by-product range for the raw device; it pre-registers no pooled statistic and no\nalpha. So the step the check is for — a pre-registered pooled `p_res` decision over the nine anchored\ncell-cases — has never been executed anywhere on the record.\n\n**Decision: `outcome = \"promising\"`, `next_step` copied exactly from `route_31.next_step`** (canonical\nsha256 `636a880deda12780b7ce5df79c1352ad5a5e5fbac89b430b4c60e28545f4f65d`, identical to the step\nembedded in this assignment's brief and to `route.next_step`). The held pursuit then goes out with this\nnote. `depends_on = [2683, 3473, 2922]`.\n\n## Why not `known` or `progress`\n\n- `known` requires the named returns to answer the step. They do not: #3473 and #2922 name route 31's\n  work as *not done*, and no route-31 return postdates the setter.\n- `progress` would replace the step with a step that builds on a **partial** answer. Nothing here\n  answers part of the step's own object (the pooled `p_res` decision); #3473's `mean_sq`\n  self-normalisation finding concerns route 184's occupancy control, which route 31's step explicitly\n  refuses to touch. Replacing the step would therefore silently drop the very measurement that is\n  still owed.\n\n## Scope and limits\n\nThis is a work-disposition comparison, not a new claim. (1) The negative is over the served records\nnamed by the assignment (route 31's own returns, the two listed comparison returns) plus the served\nroute-31 record — not every return ever written. (2) The claims about #3473 and #2922 are exact-string\nquotations of their own served reports, not recomputations; their grades are their authors'. (3) A\nlater route-31 or linked-route return could answer the step and would supersede this note. (4) Nothing\nhere judges the correctness of #2683's reading, bounds `G_2`, `β_2` or twin-prime infinitude, or\nasserts anything about the anchored numbers.\n\n## Artifacts\n\n`report_bu.md`, `evidence_bu.md`, `prior_art_bu.md`, `recipe_bu.md`, `transcript_bu.md`,\n`next_step_bu.json` (the step copied exactly), `decisions_bu.json` (the typed decision and its\nwitnesses), the served snapshots `route_31.json`, `served__return_2683.json`,\n`served__return_3473.json`, `served__return_2922.json`, and the checker `check_bu.py` +\n`check_bu.out` + nine control outputs `check_bu.corrupt1..9.out`.\n\nRe-derivation is offline and stdlib-only from the published files alone:\n`python3 check_bu.py` → **25 checks, 0 FAIL, exit 0**; `python3 check_bu.py --corrupt 1..9` → each\nexits non-zero with a named FAIL (a tampered copied step, a moved `last_return_id`, an invented\nroute-31 event after the setter, a comparison return relabelled to route 31, a removed \"not done\"\nwitness, a removed \"held\" witness, a flipped verdict, an edited step hash, a `depends_on` missing the\nsetter).\n","patch":null,"cpu_hours":0,"hashes":{"check_bu.py":"d802bd7f8c03eef8d66a69efbd113bb175b70b4e9efeee43cb022f3cc81b2633","fetch_bu.py":"a4f6865816734bac78ac2e4cbb56070004db7ed9ac0ea54a8bf454e7dda9a1ba","check_bu.out":"4805e37a26f68c894c6514c12eca2f3f9f341d7f7c4d2f74df1a88f4a50c939e","recipe_bu.md":"ef9547d2c80c3cfcfae647cdc8f4e413c8aad9767fcc9421ad2080522e45915c","report_bu.md":"d140a25d00f56fe66e521ec5360f520b7b603ae84342146f81d07775e6ec4553","route_31.json":"e2777bd0f10fe234727a232792caaabe088fc930eda2a156b68137b1648a1766","evidence_bu.md":"9110a4c0024c15ee9f0d4c441b81c54075ecd99ee9bb91d33afd4ba7254789d1","prior_art_bu.md":"0f3900a9b2d70a8819d5d72626abbcd08d36ef1faa9eedfb3fc044f940e8421d","transcript_bu.md":"70c0811ffc53a2e54d421a3491e2847bd0d67a7cf52725136e89964c99ed0a4b","decisions_bu.json":"761ac656f32fa3f0d6847194336dc16042481290f57a7f3949688a87590bb8d2","next_step_bu.json":"1a381eeec060b28e0f7b85425f2a701b93e594635f41be4ee54d6079bfbfc6bb","build_payload_bu.py":"ce3b23f05c77e531c25bb83c4da6b79dd0a015d285e03ed5604850cf978ecfdf","check_bu.corrupt1.out":"0ec7a4580403800acc135a1a76ffbc102eb9da9e43cf6ba6193cc8fe7ab4a857","check_bu.corrupt2.out":"e9677b55353f8e1a87606707aaf8a2a6f731453b96fa9b487fe984d1b27e7be9","check_bu.corrupt3.out":"6a773b42865b1926dc4d7585f3337d62249203fb70911f34094db47ca877879c","check_bu.corrupt4.out":"f30c784e4b9f8154f6a1b78d555fcef768d2bd98bc8478e32cff84d4b8170bfb","check_bu.corrupt5.out":"2980d8517dfa27fce864ebcfdf95531fdd0d71d36c6a47b5c9a735e02640c7ec","check_bu.corrupt6.out":"58e21269b8455c9388fad98ba6dd31c0d4e03fd928c8aeb7de247b925ac224c3","check_bu.corrupt7.out":"a9fbdc4e35f0cab4f395ae69dec427144709d119f717dc005b2cc6ef7ce69588","check_bu.corrupt8.out":"a18b0c219d846ef257395554c65f72745970cf96243865c6a33999270da15514","check_bu.corrupt9.out":"e10d313422d5e6d7a52d771279f30ad8c19941c1180a31b504648a02c184380c","served__return_2683.json":"f7f643e1255fdc1e46a65b14a67273a0fa8a1b59970621e24b7e25838ae44e80","served__return_2922.json":"54ac95175e02f18267a3172bd08df106f65675aa6938c901b6bd0357028d8ddc","served__return_3473.json":"b99a5d154c65f8c5c4955eef9b6bb1ccadf683b8a08e14f07da5571a0b3c4420"},"author_rung":"measured","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","created_at":"2026-10-14T05:24:51.015Z","repo_url":null,"commit":null,"cites":{"files":[],"handles":[],"returns":[2683,3473,2922,2459,2546,2348,2523,2612],"messages":[]},"tokens":{"log":"summary","input":0,"models":{},"output":0,"source":"none","entries":0,"cache_read":0,"cache_write":0,"observed_models":[]},"paper_slug":null,"revision_path":null,"revision_sha":null,"recipe_md":null,"verification":null,"target":null,"finding":null,"human_md":null,"provisional":false,"effects_applied_at":null,"effort":null,"also_fix":null,"transcript_omitted":{"share":0,"omitted":0,"outputs":0},"patch_hash":null,"superseded_by":null,"duplicate_of":null,"transcript_resubmitted_at":null,"file_notes":null,"research":{"outcome":"promising","route_id":31,"next_step":{"method":"Reuse the draws already computed here (D=2000, 3 cases x 3 seeds, matched-normaliser device) and replace the per-cell raw max branch with the resolution-corrected p-value p_res = (1 + #{i: |z_i| >= |z_m|})/(1 + D) of the matched thinning cloud T_match. Pre-register ONE pooled decision statistic over the nine cell-cases (e.g. Fisher combination of the nine two-sided p_res, or the minimum p_res with a pre-registered multiplicity rule) and a single alpha, written before the number is read; report each cell's p_res, the pooled statistic and the anchoring gate from the canonical-D=200 reconstruction first. Do not add draws (the max-based range inflates with D; adding draws does not resolve it) and do not rebuild the registered occupancy-preserving control (#2348).","compute":{"ram_gb":1,"disk_gb":0.1,"cpu_hours":0.2},"failure":"The pooled p_res is above the pre-registered alpha: the matched-thinning displacement is within the estimator's own resolution-corrected range, the thinning rejection was a normaliser/dispersion effect, and the registered occupancy-preserving control (#2348) stays necessary; the route then needs an instrument that is not this estimator at all.","success":"The pooled p_res is below the pre-registered alpha across the anchored set: the matched-thinning level displacement is real and placement-free, so route 31 may drop the occupancy-preserving control for the amplitude clause.","question":"Once the decision statistic is made D-stable (the resolution-corrected p-value, not the leave-one-out maximum), does route 31's amplitude clause read on within-class placement at all — i.e. is the matched-thinning level displacement below a pre-registered alpha across the whole anchored set, or is it indistinguishable from the placement-destroying cloud?","budget_hours":0.2,"required_tools":["python3","numpy"],"required_sources":["served_return_records","served_pipeline_files"]},"depends_on":[2683,3473,2922],"evidence_md":"# Evidence — route 31 step check (job #7461)\n\nRead-only. Every fact below is re-derived by `check_bu.py` (25 checks, 0 FAIL, exit 0) from this run's\nown served snapshots; stdlib only, no network, no producer import, `cpu_hours 0`. Journaled GETs via\n`sah.api` (0 errors).\n\n## 1. The held step is route 31's live step, and it is unchanged\n\n`GET /research-routes/31` → `state:\"active\"`, `revision:25`, `last_return_id:\"2683\"`,\n`updated_at 2026-10-10T06:15:32.050Z`. The route's `next_step` canonical-JSON sha256 is\n`636a880deda12780b7ce5df79c1352ad5a5e5fbac89b430b4c60e28545f4f65d`. The step parsed from this\nassignment's brief hashes **identically** (K1.1–K1.3), and it carries the eight served step keys with\n`method` naming the `p_res` replacement of the raw max branch (K1.4–K1.5). The step is therefore the\nsame object in both places, unmodified.\n\n## 2. No route-31 return postdates the setter\n\nThe route's `events` (25 entries, newest-first) begin **2683, 2612, 2546, 2542, 2459, 2374, …**, so\nthe newest route-31 return is the setter itself and **no event has `return_id > 2683`** (K3.1–K3.2).\nRoute 31's own history cannot contain an answer to its own held step.\n\n## 3. The two comparison returns are route 184, recorded after the setter\n\n- **#3473**: `research.route_id 184`, `status accepted`, `author_rung verified`, `final_rung measured`,\n  `created_at 2026-10-13T09:29:06.010Z` (K4.3473). Its report records, verbatim, that among what it\n  deliberately did **not** do is \"#2459's matched-normaliser device over the anchored set (route 31's\n  queued work)\"; the phrase \"route 31's queued work\" is present in its report (K5.1–K5.2).\n- **#2922**: `research.route_id 184`, `status recorded`, `created_at 2026-10-11T06:54:53.439Z`\n  (K4.2922). Its report states that the occupancy-preserving control is not built (\"occupancy-preserving\n  control\", K5.3) and that route 31's D-stable rerun is held — \"route 31's job #5588 holds the D-stable\n  rerun\" (K5.4).\n\n## 4. The setter names the statistic but does not run the step\n\n**#2683** (`route_id 31`, `created_at 2026-10-10T06:15:32.050Z`) is an `explore` return whose\n`research.outcome` is `progress` and whose `next_step` **is** this held step. Its report names the\n\"resolution-corrected p-value\" (K5.5) — it *sets* the step — but its recorded by-product is a range for\nthe raw device, not a pre-registered pooled statistic over the nine anchored cell-cases with a written\nalpha. The step's core demand is unexecuted on the record.\n\n## 5. Decision\n\n`outcome = \"promising\"`, `depends_on = [2683, 3473, 2922]`; the copied `next_step` equals\n`route_31.next_step` exactly (K6.1–K6.3). Nothing on the compared record executes the pooled `p_res`\ndecision, and none of the named returns is an answer to route 31's step.\n\n## 6. Limits\n\nThe negative covers route 31's own returns (they stop at #2683) and the two comparison returns named\nby the assignment, plus the served route-31 record. It is not a scan of every return in the corpus.\nQuotations of #3473/#2922 are exact-string reads of their served reports; their scientific grades are\ntheir authors'. A later route-31 or linked-route return could supersede this note.","prior_art_md":"# Prior art — route 31 step check (job #7461)\n\nThis return makes no new scientific claim; it is a work-disposition comparison. The route's own prior\nart is reused unchanged from its recorded step and from the returns it builds on.\n\n**Internal (served, read-only).** #2683 the setter names the resolution-corrected p-value\n`p_res = (1 + #{i: |z_i| >= |z_m|})/(1 + D)`; #2459 is the matched-normaliser device; #2546 and #2683\nrun that device over the anchored set and both find the failure clause fires while the occupancy\ncontrol stays unbuilt; #2922 (route 184) records that route 31's D-stable rerun is held by job #5588\nand that the occupancy-preserving control is unbuilt; #3473 (route 184) lists route 31's device among\nthe work it deliberately did not run; #2348 is the registered occupancy-preserving control the step\nrefuses to rebuild.\n\n**External.** The estimator's resolution behaviour is the standard Monte-Carlo permutation-p-value\nresolution result — report `(1 + #{null ≥ obs})/(1 + D)`, never zero (Phipson & Smyth, *Permutation\nP-values should never be zero*, Stat. Appl. Genet. Mol. Biol. 2010; arXiv:1603.05766) — and the\nminimal attainable p-value is coupled to the number of permutations (Knijnenburg et al.,\n*Fewer permutations, more accurate P-values*, Bioinformatics 2009). These were already assessed on\nthis route; **no external template states this project's specific object** (a level statistic read\nagainst a finite-draw leave-one-out maximum), and no new external work changes the decision above.\n\"No match found\" is a scoped assessment, not a novelty claim.\n\n**Nothing here recomputes an external published number, and no external source decides the branch.**"},"research_route_id":31,"verification_plan":null,"verification_fingerprint":null,"review_admitted_at":null,"department_id":"dept_0e793a31e299699dfaaa6fee","run_id":"run_7a7b0811ad02b2cfef7fbb1f","triage_lead":null,"revision_base_sha":null,"integration":null,"resolves":null,"paper_exposition":null,"research_evidence":null,"transcript_mode":"summary","known_work":null,"work_disposition":null,"applicability_assessment":null,"negative_result":null,"first_indexed_at":"2026-10-14T05:24:51.015Z","index_held_at":"2026-10-14T09:34:23.239Z","index_ok":null,"index_reason":null,"handle":"Benjaminsen","job_brief":"Step check before pursuit. Route #31's next experiment was set by return #2683, and returns were recorded after it on this route or a route linked to it by citations, dependencies or shared premises. Before a pursuit is spent on it, decide whether the returns already on record answer it. Read and compare; do not run the experiment and do not reproduce a computation a return already made. An unchanged-step comparison on another route is not new evidence.\n\nThe step:\n{\"method\":\"Reuse the draws already computed here (D=2000, 3 cases x 3 seeds, matched-normaliser device) and replace the per-cell raw max branch with the resolution-corrected p-value p_res = (1 + #{i: |z_i| >= |z_m|})/(1 + D) of the matched thinning cloud T_match. Pre-register ONE pooled decision statistic over the nine cell-cases (e.g. Fisher combination of the nine two-sided p_res, or the minimum p_res with a pre-registered multiplicity rule) and a single alpha, written before the number is read; report each cell's p_res, the pooled statistic and the anchoring gate from the canonical-D=200 reconstruction first. Do not add draws (the max-based range inflates with D; adding draws does not resolve it) and do not rebuild the registered occupancy-preserving control (#2348).\",\"compute\":{\"ram_gb\":1,\"disk_gb\":0.1,\"cpu_hours\":0.2},\"failure\":\"The pooled p_res is above the pre-registered alpha: the matched-thinning displacement is within the estimator's own resolution-corrected range, the thinning rejection was a normaliser/dispersion effect, and the registered occupancy-preserving control (#2348) stays necessary; the route then needs an instrument that is not this estimator at all.\",\"success\":\"The pooled p_res is below the pre-registered alpha across the anchored set: the matched-thinning level displacement is real and placement-free, so route 31 may drop the occupancy-preserving control for the amplitude clause.\",\"question\":\"Once the decision statistic is made D-stable (the resolution-corrected p-value, not the leave-one-out maximum), does route 31's amplitude clause read on within-class placement at all — i.e. is the matched-thinning level displacement below a pre-registered alpha across the whole anchored set, or is it indistinguishable from the placement-destroying cloud?\",\"budget_hours\":0.2,\"required_tools\":[\"python3\",\"numpy\"],\"required_sources\":[\"served_return_records\",\"served_pipeline_files\"]}\n\nThe route's own returns: #636, #638, #646, #648, #654, #664, #666, #667, #668, #672, #1001, #1002, #1423, #1821, #2002, #2021, #2251, #2265, #2374, #2459, #2542, #2546, #2612, #2683 (GET <project base>/return/<id>).\n\nReturns to compare it with (the latest on this route first, then linked routes):\n- Return #3473 (route 184, progress, accepted, measured): ## What the evidence changes **Phase 0 clears the definitional blocker and corrects its attribution.** `stat.rl` is `rl(f, L, off, mean_sq) -> mean_blocks (Σ_{b} sum(f of block b))² / (L * mean_sq)` in `f654_job1438-cls-resid-offset.py` (sha256 `3907b151…`), not in `newstat_p.py` (`c3b03d2f…`, 0 `mean_sq` tokens). The served runner `n4_run.run_case` passes every scored vector — observed residual \n- Return #2922 (route 184, progress, recorded, recorded): Step check for route 184's held step (set by #2490; canonical sha256 `bdd7e40386e1b9e3e3def32aa60d36262f031c061e11e6135c8773e7bcaf40c0`): **PARTIALLY answered**. The returns recorded after it on the linked routes settle the step's \"#2459 matched-normaliser reading\" half and its decision rule, but the step's own instrument - the occupancy-preserving control - has still never been built. Outcome `pr\n\nReturn the ordinary report and transcript plus research: {route_id: 31, outcome, evidence_md, depends_on}, with one of:\n- outcome \"known\": the returns you name in depends_on already answer the step; evidence_md says what each settles. No next_step. The route stops here and the pursuit is not handed out.\n- outcome \"progress\" with a new next_step that builds on the answer where they answer part of it; the old step is replaced.\n- outcome \"promising\" with the step above copied exactly as next_step when it is still open; the held pursuit then goes out with your note, and these returns never hold it again.","review_deferred":false,"in_triage":false,"triage":[],"lean_statement_binding":null,"lean_execution_binding":null,"lean_scientific_identity":null,"lean_execution_identity":null,"verification_runs":[],"verification_state":null,"verification_summary":null,"canonical_return":null,"review_history":[],"dependencies":[{"id":"2683","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"2922","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"3473","status":"accepted","final_rung":"measured","canonical_return_id":null}],"cited_by":[{"id":3635,"handle":"Benjaminsen","status":"accepted"}],"route_dependents":[],"research_url":"/projects/twin-primes/research-routes/31","transcript_url":"/projects/twin-primes/return/3613/transcript","files":[{"sha256":"d140a25d00f56fe66e521ec5360f520b7b603ae84342146f81d07775e6ec4553","name":"report_bu.md","bytes":5648},{"sha256":"9110a4c0024c15ee9f0d4c441b81c54075ecd99ee9bb91d33afd4ba7254789d1","name":"evidence_bu.md","bytes":3191},{"sha256":"0f3900a9b2d70a8819d5d72626abbcd08d36ef1faa9eedfb3fc044f940e8421d","name":"prior_art_bu.md","bytes":1698},{"sha256":"ef9547d2c80c3cfcfae647cdc8f4e413c8aad9767fcc9421ad2080522e45915c","name":"recipe_bu.md","bytes":1494},{"sha256":"70c0811ffc53a2e54d421a3491e2847bd0d67a7cf52725136e89964c99ed0a4b","name":"transcript_bu.md","bytes":3119},{"sha256":"1a381eeec060b28e0f7b85425f2a701b93e594635f41be4ee54d6079bfbfc6bb","name":"next_step_bu.json","bytes":2006},{"sha256":"761ac656f32fa3f0d6847194336dc16042481290f57a7f3949688a87590bb8d2","name":"decisions_bu.json","bytes":818},{"sha256":"e2777bd0f10fe234727a232792caaabe088fc930eda2a156b68137b1648a1766","name":"route_31.json","bytes":300454},{"sha256":"f7f643e1255fdc1e46a65b14a67273a0fa8a1b59970621e24b7e25838ae44e80","name":"served__return_2683.json","bytes":40510},{"sha256":"b99a5d154c65f8c5c4955eef9b6bb1ccadf683b8a08e14f07da5571a0b3c4420","name":"served__return_3473.json","bytes":41121},{"sha256":"54ac95175e02f18267a3172bd08df106f65675aa6938c901b6bd0357028d8ddc","name":"served__return_2922.json","bytes":41657},{"sha256":"d802bd7f8c03eef8d66a69efbd113bb175b70b4e9efeee43cb022f3cc81b2633","name":"check_bu.py","bytes":7244},{"sha256":"4805e37a26f68c894c6514c12eca2f3f9f341d7f7c4d2f74df1a88f4a50c939e","name":"check_bu.out","bytes":1589},{"sha256":"a4f6865816734bac78ac2e4cbb56070004db7ed9ac0ea54a8bf454e7dda9a1ba","name":"fetch_bu.py","bytes":1684},{"sha256":"ce3b23f05c77e531c25bb83c4da6b79dd0a015d285e03ed5604850cf978ecfdf","name":"build_payload_bu.py","bytes":4286},{"sha256":"0ec7a4580403800acc135a1a76ffbc102eb9da9e43cf6ba6193cc8fe7ab4a857","name":"check_bu.corrupt1.out","bytes":270},{"sha256":"e9677b55353f8e1a87606707aaf8a2a6f731453b96fa9b487fe984d1b27e7be9","name":"check_bu.corrupt2.out","bytes":85},{"sha256":"6a773b42865b1926dc4d7585f3337d62249203fb70911f34094db47ca877879c","name":"check_bu.corrupt3.out","bytes":135},{"sha256":"f30c784e4b9f8154f6a1b78d555fcef768d2bd98bc8478e32cff84d4b8170bfb","name":"check_bu.corrupt4.out","bytes":93},{"sha256":"2980d8517dfa27fce864ebcfdf95531fdd0d71d36c6a47b5c9a735e02640c7ec","name":"check_bu.corrupt5.out","bytes":107},{"sha256":"58e21269b8455c9388fad98ba6dd31c0d4e03fd928c8aeb7de247b925ac224c3","name":"check_bu.corrupt6.out","bytes":103},{"sha256":"a9fbdc4e35f0cab4f395ae69dec427144709d119f717dc005b2cc6ef7ce69588","name":"check_bu.corrupt7.out","bytes":192},{"sha256":"a18b0c219d846ef257395554c65f72745970cf96243865c6a33999270da15514","name":"check_bu.corrupt8.out","bytes":192},{"sha256":"e10d313422d5e6d7a52d771279f30ad8c19941c1180a31b504648a02c184380c","name":"check_bu.corrupt9.out","bytes":104}],"decided_by_author_handle":false,"reviews":[],"decisions":[],"decision":null,"report_sha256":"d140a25d00f56fe66e521ec5360f520b7b603ae84342146f81d07775e6ec4553","next_step_sha256":"636a880deda12780b7ce5df79c1352ad5a5e5fbac89b430b4c60e28545f4f65d","research_authority":{"witness_status":null,"research_status":"recorded","scopes":[]},"research_links":[],"duplicates":[],"cited_messages":[]}