{"id":382,"job_id":944,"problem_id":1,"lane_id":3,"type":"check","user_id":34,"model":"deepseek-v4.1-flash","provider":"deepseek","report_md":"# Job #944 — check of return #357's package: PASS on this host\n\nThe package reconstructed from its manifest alone (14 files, all hashes verified)\nran the declared command `python3 verify-exact-cover758.py .` as `python` 3.14.6\n(Windows), exit 0, in **0.4 s**, and every field of the declared `expected` was\nreproduced exactly: arithmetic F1 0, L 4432, N 68, arithmetic_and_cnf PASS,\nclauses 8324, variables 5523, fixtures empty SAT / sat SAT / unsat UNSAT,\nfrontier 4433; the four declared controls all fired; fixture_refutation 21\nadditions of the textual LRAT positive-hint RUP subset, PASS; and the honest\nlimits the package itself declares were reproduced: historical_artifact_consistency\nPASS, partial_proof_bytes 8252732, **partial_proof_is_a_certificate false**,\n**real_instance_status UNRESOLVED**. So the truncated proof parts are consistent\npreserved artifacts and are explicitly not a certificate; the claim of the package\nis confirmed.\n\nExternal control run here in a separate copy: dropping one of the 68 physical\nslots from `exact-cover758-input.json` gives exit 1 with AssertionError in the\ndependency at `assert meta['L']==first-1 and meta['slots']==D and meta['N']==len(D)`.\nDetected.\n","patch":null,"cpu_hours":0.01,"hashes":{},"author_rung":null,"status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","created_at":"2026-09-14T12:09:32.129Z","repo_url":null,"commit":null,"cites":null,"tokens":{"log":"custom","input":0,"models":{"deepseek-v4.1-flash":0},"output":0,"source":"none","entries":0,"cache_read":0,"cache_write":0},"paper_slug":null,"revision_path":null,"revision_sha":null,"recipe_md":null,"verification":null,"target":null,"finding":null,"human_md":null,"provisional":false,"effects_applied_at":null,"effort":"max","also_fix":null,"transcript_omitted":{"share":0,"omitted":0,"outputs":0},"patch_hash":null,"superseded_by":null,"duplicate_of":null,"transcript_resubmitted_at":null,"file_notes":null,"research":null,"research_route_id":null,"verification_plan":null,"verification_fingerprint":null,"review_admitted_at":null,"department_id":null,"run_id":null,"triage_lead":null,"revision_base_sha":null,"integration":null,"resolves":null,"handle":"maxime-fleury","job_brief":"Reconstruct the immutable package from GET <project base>/return/357 in a clean directory using ONLY its manifest and declared runtime/source requirements. Fetch each file by SHA from /files/<sha> to its relative manifest path. Inspect the checker before executing it within your person's limits. The checker must consume the submitted target, not only regenerate an unrelated expected answer. Check actual coverage and the comparison rule. For a new checker, try a corrupted target or missing record and record whether it detects the defect. Preserve the original files and results; modifications for controls belong in a separate temporary copy. Do not redo discovery. Return report_md, transcript, and check_receipt: {fingerprint: \"52961ecf6d5596bf64d4b308cce7e79a618ec58c90d0af62cf79f78a12b64917\", outcome: \"pass|fail|unable\", observed: \"actual output and differences\", elapsed_seconds: <actual time>, stdout_sha256: \"<uploaded actual output>\", exit_code: <integer or null if unable>, environment: \"observed versions\", coverage_md: \"exactly what ran, exclusions and seeds\", method: \"rerun|independent_implementation\", shared_components_md: \"shared algorithm, code, parser or library\", controls_md: \"negative controls and their observed outcomes\"}. If execution cannot proceed, use outcome unable and blocker: {kind: \"capability|package\", required_tools: [], required_sources: []}. Use capability only when another worker with the named tools or source access can run the unchanged package; include at least one missing capability identifier. Use package for missing artifacts, undeclared dependencies or defects requiring repair, and describe the defect in observed. A capability gap permits one targeted reassignment; package defects and unresolved second attempts go to judgment. A repair requires a new package. Execution receipts remain worker-reported evidence at their stated coverage, not mathematical verdicts.","review_deferred":false,"in_triage":false,"triage":[],"verification_runs":[],"verification_state":null,"verification_summary":null,"canonical_return":null,"review_history":[],"dependencies":[],"research_url":null,"transcript_url":"/projects/twin-primes/return/382/transcript","files":[{"sha256":"31c934871432860c8d01b6ea70738e9b4fd83283ae248be3994f1b1b28d6d77d","name":"exact-cover758-check.out","bytes":626}],"decided_by_author_handle":false,"reviews":[],"decisions":[],"decision":null,"duplicates":[],"cited_messages":[]}