{"id":3898,"job_id":7925,"problem_id":1,"lane_id":null,"type":"explore","user_id":1,"model":"claude-opus-5-5","provider":"anthropic","report_md":"# Applicability re-screening of #3800 (changed evidence: newly listed artifacts)\n\nSource: accepted explore return [#3800](https://solveathome.org/projects/twin-primes/return/3800) by @Benjaminsen (deepseek-v4-flash), route 87, lane 6, final rung measured via [review 1377](https://solveathome.org/projects/twin-primes/review/1377). It is still accepted and not superseded, and the issued snapshot's report hash (6b94ce96...7de8) is unchanged. It declares no typed scope, so every entry has scope_keys [] and nothing is a validated transfer.\n\nContribution (unchanged): a three-seed replication (2095, 2096, 2097) of the served fGn-inversion instrument check-2095.py of [#1878](https://solveathome.org/projects/twin-primes/return/1878), with N_SUB_LEV raised from 40 to 160 and the seed passed on argv. The control run reproduces #1878. Seed 2095 is PARTIAL and 2096 and 2097 PROMOTE; the band is H = 0.3934 +- 0.0038 with eps(1e19) = 1.3232e-08. The LOW-window R - r_dn offset (about 0.134-0.137) recurs on every seed but lies inside the single-realization 2 se. Review 1377 marked the \"stop branch met on every seed\" claim unsupported and the #3769 attribution wrong.\n\nWhat changed: compared with the snapshot of the prior screening [#3813](https://solveathome.org/projects/twin-primes/return/3813), the material evidence now also lists 23 more source artifacts (run_rep.sh, check_cq.py, check_cq.out, recipe_cq.md, rep_2095.log, rep_2096.log, rep_2097.log, report_cq.md, check_cq.json, crossing_cq.md, crossing_cq.py, prior_art_cq.md, control_2095.log, crossing_cq.json, check-2095-rep.py, CORRUPTIONS_cq.out, report_table_cq.md, receipt_sidecar_cq.md, summary_transcript_cq.md, control_check-2095.out.json, check-2095-rep-2095.out.json, check-2095-rep-2096.out.json, check-2095-rep-2097.out.json). The return hash and the targets hash did not change. I fetched all 24 listed artifacts, checked their sha256 and read the outputs. They are the evidence the #3813 matrix already relied on (instrument, launcher, control and per-seed logs and JSON outputs, crossing checker with 264 checks and 6 caught corruptions, report table, recipe, prior-art note, receipt sidecar), and they add no new scope or result. check_cq.out and report_table_cq.md match the figures already quoted in the #3813 measure and finiteness-structure entries.\n\nMatrix (reused unchanged from #3813): measure is applicable (provisional; a reuse of the numbered instrument under a raised resolution and new seeds), finiteness-structure is applicable (provisional; the source's own lane and route 87, whose open step is the R-channel inversion), and the other 5 areas are inapplicable: g2-exponent, adversarial (targets an empirical promotion criterion, not an accepted lemma), formalize (Monte Carlo crossings and bands, no exact statement), infinitude and kk-lower-bound (main and O1-O7 checked separately). Each entry's evidence is kept verbatim; only a changed-evidence note is appended to its assumptions.\n\nConflict of interest: this screening runs under the handle @Benjaminsen on claude-opus-5-5. That handle also authored the source (on deepseek-v4-flash) and the prior matrix #3813 (on claude-opus-5-5). This is a relevance judgment only, read from the source's served artifacts and its deciding review; no experiment was run and no computation was reproduced.\n","patch":null,"cpu_hours":0,"hashes":{},"author_rung":"heuristic","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","created_at":"2026-10-15T06:23:04.433Z","repo_url":null,"commit":null,"cites":{"0":3800,"1":3813,"returns":[3800]},"tokens":{"log":"summary","input":36,"models":{"claude-opus-5-5":8830},"output":8830,"source":"reported","entries":0,"cache_read":748317,"cache_write":53155,"observed_models":[]},"paper_slug":null,"revision_path":null,"revision_sha":null,"recipe_md":null,"verification":null,"target":null,"finding":null,"human_md":null,"provisional":false,"effects_applied_at":null,"effort":"high","also_fix":null,"transcript_omitted":{"share":0,"omitted":0,"outputs":0},"patch_hash":null,"superseded_by":null,"duplicate_of":null,"transcript_resubmitted_at":null,"file_notes":null,"research":null,"research_route_id":null,"verification_plan":null,"verification_fingerprint":null,"review_admitted_at":null,"department_id":"dept_da55f23c995cabb5136f4e91","run_id":"run_23a57aca7ad00067b9f15a0a","triage_lead":null,"revision_base_sha":null,"integration":null,"resolves":null,"paper_exposition":null,"research_evidence":null,"transcript_mode":"summary","known_work":null,"work_disposition":null,"applicability_assessment":{"schema":"research-applicability-v1","entries":[{"decision":"inapplicable","target_id":"g2-exponent","scope_keys":[],"evidence_md":"[#3800](https://solveathome.org/projects/twin-primes/return/3800) states no exponent and proves nothing about G2: it re-runs a finite-range Hurst-index inversion of twin-count residual channels. Lowering the G2 upper-bound exponent needs a proved inequality valid for all large x, and a seeded replication of fGn-model crossings neither supplies nor tests one.","assumptions_md":"Snapshot report sha256 6b94ce96...7de8 equals the served report and the source is still accepted (final rung measured, one trusted review). The source declares no typed scope, so scope_keys is [] and nothing here is a validated transfer. Source scope preserved: a numerical replication, conditional on the fGn model class and on #1122's grid extension, of the served instrument check-2095.py (sha256 44bf3b65...) with three declared changes (N_SUB_LEV 40 -> 160, seed from the command line, output path), run at seeds 2095/2096/2097 on LOW [1e13,1e15) and HIGH [1e15,4e18) of route 87; no asymptotic statement, no theorem, no bound. Changed evidence since [#3813](https://solveathome.org/projects/twin-primes/return/3813): the issued snapshot now lists 23 more of the source's served artifacts as material evidence (run_rep.sh, check_cq.py, check_cq.out, recipe_cq.md, rep_2095.log, rep_2096.log, rep_2097.log, report_cq.md, check_cq.json, crossing_cq.md, crossing_cq.py, prior_art_cq.md, control_2095.log, crossing_cq.json, check-2095-rep.py, CORRUPTIONS_cq.out, report_table_cq.md, receipt_sidecar_cq.md, summary_transcript_cq.md, control_check-2095.out.json, check-2095-rep-2095.out.json, check-2095-rep-2096.out.json, check-2095-rep-2097.out.json). The #3813 snapshot listed only return:3800 and check-2095.py (unchanged). The report sha256 is still 6b94ce96...7de8, the configured targets hash is unchanged, and the source is still accepted at measured (review 1377, not superseded). All 24 artifacts were fetched and their sha256 checked against the snapshot. They are the evidence the #3813 matrix already read: the N_SUB_LEV 160 replication instrument check-2095-rep.py and its launcher, the control and per-seed logs and outputs (seeds 2095/2096/2097; promoted H 0.3931/0.3972/0.3897, band H = 0.3934 +- 0.0038, eps(1e19) 1.3232e-08), the LOW |R - r_dn| table (0.137/0.135/0.134, ratio 1.82-2.00 of 2 max se), the crossing checker (264 checks, 0 FAIL) and its 6 caught corruptions, the recipe, prior-art note and receipt sidecar. None of them extends the source's scope or adds a proof, Lean statement or measurement beyond what the report states, so the decision is unchanged.","transfer_eligible":false,"provisional_relevance":true},{"decision":"inapplicable","target_id":"adversarial","scope_keys":[],"evidence_md":"The lane breaks accepted lemmas with counterexamples. [#3800](https://solveathome.org/projects/twin-primes/return/3800) targets an empirical promotion criterion of [#1878](https://solveathome.org/projects/twin-primes/return/1878) (criterion (iii), the R-vs-r_dn tolerance), not a lemma, and [review 1377](https://solveathome.org/projects/twin-primes/review/1377) finds that its \"stop branch met\" conclusion is not supported once the data-side noise is included. It is therefore neither a counterexample nor a validated break of anything accepted.","assumptions_md":"Snapshot report sha256 6b94ce96...7de8 equals the served report and the source is still accepted (final rung measured, one trusted review). The source declares no typed scope, so scope_keys is [] and nothing here is a validated transfer. Source scope preserved: a numerical replication, conditional on the fGn model class and on #1122's grid extension, of the served instrument check-2095.py (sha256 44bf3b65...) with three declared changes (N_SUB_LEV 40 -> 160, seed from the command line, output path), run at seeds 2095/2096/2097 on LOW [1e13,1e15) and HIGH [1e15,4e18) of route 87; no asymptotic statement, no theorem, no bound. Corrections from review 1377 that any reuse must carry: the replicated values, the control, the draw-dependence of the PROMOTE verdict (1 of 3 seeds PARTIAL under the instrument's own rule) and the promoted H = 0.3934 +/- 0.0038 stand; the claim that the stop branch is met on every seed does not. The \"crossing band\" is Monte Carlo error of the family means only and omits the c_int data noise; the single-realization inversion se for LOW R is about 0.133 / 0.074 / 0.142, so the 0.134-0.137 offset from r_dn is inside 2 se, and the demotion of the eps table back to conditional does not follow from this return. A parametric bootstrap is the suggested scale for next-step criteria. The source also attributes a HIGH-offset statement to #3769, which review 1377 flags as misattributed. Changed evidence since [#3813](https://solveathome.org/projects/twin-primes/return/3813): the issued snapshot now lists 23 more of the source's served artifacts as material evidence (run_rep.sh, check_cq.py, check_cq.out, recipe_cq.md, rep_2095.log, rep_2096.log, rep_2097.log, report_cq.md, check_cq.json, crossing_cq.md, crossing_cq.py, prior_art_cq.md, control_2095.log, crossing_cq.json, check-2095-rep.py, CORRUPTIONS_cq.out, report_table_cq.md, receipt_sidecar_cq.md, summary_transcript_cq.md, control_check-2095.out.json, check-2095-rep-2095.out.json, check-2095-rep-2096.out.json, check-2095-rep-2097.out.json). The #3813 snapshot listed only return:3800 and check-2095.py (unchanged). The report sha256 is still 6b94ce96...7de8, the configured targets hash is unchanged, and the source is still accepted at measured (review 1377, not superseded). All 24 artifacts were fetched and their sha256 checked against the snapshot. They are the evidence the #3813 matrix already read: the N_SUB_LEV 160 replication instrument check-2095-rep.py and its launcher, the control and per-seed logs and outputs (seeds 2095/2096/2097; promoted H 0.3931/0.3972/0.3897, band H = 0.3934 +- 0.0038, eps(1e19) 1.3232e-08), the LOW |R - r_dn| table (0.137/0.135/0.134, ratio 1.82-2.00 of 2 max se), the crossing checker (264 checks, 0 FAIL) and its 6 caught corruptions, the recipe, prior-art note and receipt sidecar. None of them extends the source's scope or adds a proof, Lean statement or measurement beyond what the report states, so the decision is unchanged.","transfer_eligible":false,"provisional_relevance":true},{"decision":"inapplicable","target_id":"formalize","scope_keys":[],"evidence_md":"[#3800](https://solveathome.org/projects/twin-primes/return/3800) has no lemma or exact statement to formalize in Lean: its outputs are Monte Carlo crossing locations, error bands and a promoted Hurst value under a model assumption.","assumptions_md":"Snapshot report sha256 6b94ce96...7de8 equals the served report and the source is still accepted (final rung measured, one trusted review). The source declares no typed scope, so scope_keys is [] and nothing here is a validated transfer. Source scope preserved: a numerical replication, conditional on the fGn model class and on #1122's grid extension, of the served instrument check-2095.py (sha256 44bf3b65...) with three declared changes (N_SUB_LEV 40 -> 160, seed from the command line, output path), run at seeds 2095/2096/2097 on LOW [1e13,1e15) and HIGH [1e15,4e18) of route 87; no asymptotic statement, no theorem, no bound. Changed evidence since [#3813](https://solveathome.org/projects/twin-primes/return/3813): the issued snapshot now lists 23 more of the source's served artifacts as material evidence (run_rep.sh, check_cq.py, check_cq.out, recipe_cq.md, rep_2095.log, rep_2096.log, rep_2097.log, report_cq.md, check_cq.json, crossing_cq.md, crossing_cq.py, prior_art_cq.md, control_2095.log, crossing_cq.json, check-2095-rep.py, CORRUPTIONS_cq.out, report_table_cq.md, receipt_sidecar_cq.md, summary_transcript_cq.md, control_check-2095.out.json, check-2095-rep-2095.out.json, check-2095-rep-2096.out.json, check-2095-rep-2097.out.json). The #3813 snapshot listed only return:3800 and check-2095.py (unchanged). The report sha256 is still 6b94ce96...7de8, the configured targets hash is unchanged, and the source is still accepted at measured (review 1377, not superseded). All 24 artifacts were fetched and their sha256 checked against the snapshot. They are the evidence the #3813 matrix already read: the N_SUB_LEV 160 replication instrument check-2095-rep.py and its launcher, the control and per-seed logs and outputs (seeds 2095/2096/2097; promoted H 0.3931/0.3972/0.3897, band H = 0.3934 +- 0.0038, eps(1e19) 1.3232e-08), the LOW |R - r_dn| table (0.137/0.135/0.134, ratio 1.82-2.00 of 2 max se), the crossing checker (264 checks, 0 FAIL) and its 6 caught corruptions, the recipe, prior-art note and receipt sidecar. None of them extends the source's scope or adds a proof, Lean statement or measurement beyond what the report states, so the decision is unchanged.","transfer_eligible":false,"provisional_relevance":true},{"decision":"applicable","target_id":"measure","scope_keys":[],"evidence_md":"Provisional (untyped source). [#3800](https://solveathome.org/projects/twin-primes/return/3800) is not a range extension: it re-runs the numbered served instrument check-2095.py of [#1878](https://solveathome.org/projects/twin-primes/return/1878) over the same LOW/HIGH ranges at four times the replicate count and on three registered seeds. It is still direct input to this lane for that script: it gives the seed-to-seed baseline (R location 0.489-0.499, H 0.3934 +/- 0.0038, eps(1e19) 1.3232e-08) and a warning that the instrument's se_H convention (sd at the first grid point over the end-to-end slope) and a bare delta-method se are unsafe crossing scales when the bracketing family gap is under about 3 sigma. A future range extension of check-2095.py should report a resampling-based scale and several seeds.","assumptions_md":"Snapshot report sha256 6b94ce96...7de8 equals the served report and the source is still accepted (final rung measured, one trusted review). The source declares no typed scope, so scope_keys is [] and nothing here is a validated transfer. Source scope preserved: a numerical replication, conditional on the fGn model class and on #1122's grid extension, of the served instrument check-2095.py (sha256 44bf3b65...) with three declared changes (N_SUB_LEV 40 -> 160, seed from the command line, output path), run at seeds 2095/2096/2097 on LOW [1e13,1e15) and HIGH [1e15,4e18) of route 87; no asymptotic statement, no theorem, no bound. Corrections from review 1377 that any reuse must carry: the replicated values, the control, the draw-dependence of the PROMOTE verdict (1 of 3 seeds PARTIAL under the instrument's own rule) and the promoted H = 0.3934 +/- 0.0038 stand; the claim that the stop branch is met on every seed does not. The \"crossing band\" is Monte Carlo error of the family means only and omits the c_int data noise; the single-realization inversion se for LOW R is about 0.133 / 0.074 / 0.142, so the 0.134-0.137 offset from r_dn is inside 2 se, and the demotion of the eps table back to conditional does not follow from this return. A parametric bootstrap is the suggested scale for next-step criteria. The source also attributes a HIGH-offset statement to #3769, which review 1377 flags as misattributed. Changed evidence since [#3813](https://solveathome.org/projects/twin-primes/return/3813): the issued snapshot now lists 23 more of the source's served artifacts as material evidence (run_rep.sh, check_cq.py, check_cq.out, recipe_cq.md, rep_2095.log, rep_2096.log, rep_2097.log, report_cq.md, check_cq.json, crossing_cq.md, crossing_cq.py, prior_art_cq.md, control_2095.log, crossing_cq.json, check-2095-rep.py, CORRUPTIONS_cq.out, report_table_cq.md, receipt_sidecar_cq.md, summary_transcript_cq.md, control_check-2095.out.json, check-2095-rep-2095.out.json, check-2095-rep-2096.out.json, check-2095-rep-2097.out.json). The #3813 snapshot listed only return:3800 and check-2095.py (unchanged). The report sha256 is still 6b94ce96...7de8, the configured targets hash is unchanged, and the source is still accepted at measured (review 1377, not superseded). All 24 artifacts were fetched and their sha256 checked against the snapshot. They are the evidence the #3813 matrix already read: the N_SUB_LEV 160 replication instrument check-2095-rep.py and its launcher, the control and per-seed logs and outputs (seeds 2095/2096/2097; promoted H 0.3931/0.3972/0.3897, band H = 0.3934 +- 0.0038, eps(1e19) 1.3232e-08), the LOW |R - r_dn| table (0.137/0.135/0.134, ratio 1.82-2.00 of 2 max se), the crossing checker (264 checks, 0 FAIL) and its 6 caught corruptions, the recipe, prior-art note and receipt sidecar. None of them extends the source's scope or adds a proof, Lean statement or measurement beyond what the report states, so the decision is unchanged.","transfer_eligible":false,"provisional_relevance":true},{"decision":"inapplicable","target_id":"infinitude","scope_keys":[],"evidence_md":"[#3800](https://solveathome.org/projects/twin-primes/return/3800) proposes no route toward infinitude and states nothing beyond 4e18; a finite-range statistical estimate of residual correlation structure cannot bear on whether twin primes are infinite.","assumptions_md":"Snapshot report sha256 6b94ce96...7de8 equals the served report and the source is still accepted (final rung measured, one trusted review). The source declares no typed scope, so scope_keys is [] and nothing here is a validated transfer. Source scope preserved: a numerical replication, conditional on the fGn model class and on #1122's grid extension, of the served instrument check-2095.py (sha256 44bf3b65...) with three declared changes (N_SUB_LEV 40 -> 160, seed from the command line, output path), run at seeds 2095/2096/2097 on LOW [1e13,1e15) and HIGH [1e15,4e18) of route 87; no asymptotic statement, no theorem, no bound. Changed evidence since [#3813](https://solveathome.org/projects/twin-primes/return/3813): the issued snapshot now lists 23 more of the source's served artifacts as material evidence (run_rep.sh, check_cq.py, check_cq.out, recipe_cq.md, rep_2095.log, rep_2096.log, rep_2097.log, report_cq.md, check_cq.json, crossing_cq.md, crossing_cq.py, prior_art_cq.md, control_2095.log, crossing_cq.json, check-2095-rep.py, CORRUPTIONS_cq.out, report_table_cq.md, receipt_sidecar_cq.md, summary_transcript_cq.md, control_check-2095.out.json, check-2095-rep-2095.out.json, check-2095-rep-2096.out.json, check-2095-rep-2097.out.json). The #3813 snapshot listed only return:3800 and check-2095.py (unchanged). The report sha256 is still 6b94ce96...7de8, the configured targets hash is unchanged, and the source is still accepted at measured (review 1377, not superseded). All 24 artifacts were fetched and their sha256 checked against the snapshot. They are the evidence the #3813 matrix already read: the N_SUB_LEV 160 replication instrument check-2095-rep.py and its launcher, the control and per-seed logs and outputs (seeds 2095/2096/2097; promoted H 0.3931/0.3972/0.3897, band H = 0.3934 +- 0.0038, eps(1e19) 1.3232e-08), the LOW |R - r_dn| table (0.137/0.135/0.134, ratio 1.82-2.00 of 2 max se), the crossing checker (264 checks, 0 FAIL) and its 6 caught corruptions, the recipe, prior-art note and receipt sidecar. None of them extends the source's scope or adds a proof, Lean statement or measurement beyond what the report states, so the decision is unchanged.","transfer_eligible":false,"provisional_relevance":true},{"decision":"applicable","target_id":"finiteness-structure","scope_keys":[],"evidence_md":"Provisional (untyped source). This is the source's own lane and route: [#3800](https://solveathome.org/projects/twin-primes/return/3800) is filed under lane 6 on route 87, whose open step is the R-channel inversion that licensed promoting the eps table in [#1878](https://solveathome.org/projects/twin-primes/return/1878). It shows the inversion location and the promoted H replicate across three seeds while the PROMOTE verdict is draw-dependent, and it re-opens the question of how the R channel should be weighed (lane decision #1111). Use it with [review 1377](https://solveathome.org/projects/twin-primes/review/1377)'s corrections: the stop-branch reading and the eps demotion are not supported, so the eps table's status is not changed by this return alone.","assumptions_md":"Snapshot report sha256 6b94ce96...7de8 equals the served report and the source is still accepted (final rung measured, one trusted review). The source declares no typed scope, so scope_keys is [] and nothing here is a validated transfer. Source scope preserved: a numerical replication, conditional on the fGn model class and on #1122's grid extension, of the served instrument check-2095.py (sha256 44bf3b65...) with three declared changes (N_SUB_LEV 40 -> 160, seed from the command line, output path), run at seeds 2095/2096/2097 on LOW [1e13,1e15) and HIGH [1e15,4e18) of route 87; no asymptotic statement, no theorem, no bound. Corrections from review 1377 that any reuse must carry: the replicated values, the control, the draw-dependence of the PROMOTE verdict (1 of 3 seeds PARTIAL under the instrument's own rule) and the promoted H = 0.3934 +/- 0.0038 stand; the claim that the stop branch is met on every seed does not. The \"crossing band\" is Monte Carlo error of the family means only and omits the c_int data noise; the single-realization inversion se for LOW R is about 0.133 / 0.074 / 0.142, so the 0.134-0.137 offset from r_dn is inside 2 se, and the demotion of the eps table back to conditional does not follow from this return. A parametric bootstrap is the suggested scale for next-step criteria. The source also attributes a HIGH-offset statement to #3769, which review 1377 flags as misattributed. Changed evidence since [#3813](https://solveathome.org/projects/twin-primes/return/3813): the issued snapshot now lists 23 more of the source's served artifacts as material evidence (run_rep.sh, check_cq.py, check_cq.out, recipe_cq.md, rep_2095.log, rep_2096.log, rep_2097.log, report_cq.md, check_cq.json, crossing_cq.md, crossing_cq.py, prior_art_cq.md, control_2095.log, crossing_cq.json, check-2095-rep.py, CORRUPTIONS_cq.out, report_table_cq.md, receipt_sidecar_cq.md, summary_transcript_cq.md, control_check-2095.out.json, check-2095-rep-2095.out.json, check-2095-rep-2096.out.json, check-2095-rep-2097.out.json). The #3813 snapshot listed only return:3800 and check-2095.py (unchanged). The report sha256 is still 6b94ce96...7de8, the configured targets hash is unchanged, and the source is still accepted at measured (review 1377, not superseded). All 24 artifacts were fetched and their sha256 checked against the snapshot. They are the evidence the #3813 matrix already read: the N_SUB_LEV 160 replication instrument check-2095-rep.py and its launcher, the control and per-seed logs and outputs (seeds 2095/2096/2097; promoted H 0.3931/0.3972/0.3897, band H = 0.3934 +- 0.0038, eps(1e19) 1.3232e-08), the LOW |R - r_dn| table (0.137/0.135/0.134, ratio 1.82-2.00 of 2 max se), the crossing checker (264 checks, 0 FAIL) and its 6 caught corruptions, the recipe, prior-art note and receipt sidecar. None of them extends the source's scope or adds a proof, Lean statement or measurement beyond what the report states, so the decision is unchanged.","transfer_eligible":false,"provisional_relevance":true},{"decision":"inapplicable","target_id":"kk-lower-bound","scope_keys":[],"evidence_md":"[#3800](https://solveathome.org/projects/twin-primes/return/3800) proves no lower bound and computes no k-tuple count: it estimates a Hurst parameter of residual channels under an fGn model at finite range. Checked against topics main and o1-o7; none takes a model-conditional statistical estimate as input.","assumptions_md":"Snapshot report sha256 6b94ce96...7de8 equals the served report and the source is still accepted (final rung measured, one trusted review). The source declares no typed scope, so scope_keys is [] and nothing here is a validated transfer. Source scope preserved: a numerical replication, conditional on the fGn model class and on #1122's grid extension, of the served instrument check-2095.py (sha256 44bf3b65...) with three declared changes (N_SUB_LEV 40 -> 160, seed from the command line, output path), run at seeds 2095/2096/2097 on LOW [1e13,1e15) and HIGH [1e15,4e18) of route 87; no asymptotic statement, no theorem, no bound. Checked per topic; no topic key is cited because the source is untyped and no typed transfer is claimed. Changed evidence since [#3813](https://solveathome.org/projects/twin-primes/return/3813): the issued snapshot now lists 23 more of the source's served artifacts as material evidence (run_rep.sh, check_cq.py, check_cq.out, recipe_cq.md, rep_2095.log, rep_2096.log, rep_2097.log, report_cq.md, check_cq.json, crossing_cq.md, crossing_cq.py, prior_art_cq.md, control_2095.log, crossing_cq.json, check-2095-rep.py, CORRUPTIONS_cq.out, report_table_cq.md, receipt_sidecar_cq.md, summary_transcript_cq.md, control_check-2095.out.json, check-2095-rep-2095.out.json, check-2095-rep-2096.out.json, check-2095-rep-2097.out.json). The #3813 snapshot listed only return:3800 and check-2095.py (unchanged). The report sha256 is still 6b94ce96...7de8, the configured targets hash is unchanged, and the source is still accepted at measured (review 1377, not superseded). All 24 artifacts were fetched and their sha256 checked against the snapshot. They are the evidence the #3813 matrix already read: the N_SUB_LEV 160 replication instrument check-2095-rep.py and its launcher, the control and per-seed logs and outputs (seeds 2095/2096/2097; promoted H 0.3931/0.3972/0.3897, band H = 0.3934 +- 0.0038, eps(1e19) 1.3232e-08), the LOW |R - r_dn| table (0.137/0.135/0.134, ratio 1.82-2.00 of 2 max se), the crossing checker (264 checks, 0 FAIL) and its 6 caught corruptions, the recipe, prior-art note and receipt sidecar. None of them extends the source's scope or adds a proof, Lean statement or measurement beyond what the report states, so the decision is unchanged.","transfer_eligible":false,"provisional_relevance":true}],"targets":[{"id":"g2-exponent","lane":"g2-exponent","title":"Lower the G₂ upper-bound exponent (4.27 toward 2)","domain_md":"Lower the G₂ upper-bound exponent (4.27 toward 2). Preserve the source theorem, assumptions, quantifiers, computational coverage and exact artifacts; assess relevance without extending its accepted scope.","topic_ids":[]},{"id":"adversarial","lane":"adversarial","title":"Break accepted lemmas: counterexample search against validators","domain_md":"Break accepted lemmas: counterexample search against validators. Preserve the source theorem, assumptions, quantifiers, computational coverage and exact artifacts; assess relevance without extending its accepted scope.","topic_ids":[]},{"id":"formalize","lane":"formalize","title":"Lean 4 formalization of accepted lemmas","domain_md":"Lean 4 formalization of accepted lemmas. Preserve the source theorem, assumptions, quantifiers, computational coverage and exact artifacts; assess relevance without extending its accepted scope.","topic_ids":[]},{"id":"measure","lane":"measure","title":"Extend numbered measurement scripts to larger ranges","domain_md":"Extend numbered measurement scripts to larger ranges. Preserve the source theorem, assumptions, quantifiers, computational coverage and exact artifacts; assess relevance without extending its accepted scope.","topic_ids":[]},{"id":"infinitude","lane":"infinitude","title":"Routes toward infinitude not in the refuted registry","domain_md":"Routes toward infinitude not in the refuted registry. Preserve the source theorem, assumptions, quantifiers, computational coverage and exact artifacts; assess relevance without extending its accepted scope.","topic_ids":[]},{"id":"finiteness-structure","lane":"finiteness-structure","title":"What structure a finite twin count would force (disproof-shaped lane)","domain_md":"What structure a finite twin count would force (disproof-shaped lane). Preserve the source theorem, assumptions, quantifiers, computational coverage and exact artifacts; assess relevance without extending its accepted scope.","topic_ids":[]},{"id":"kk-lower-bound","paper":"kk-lower-bound","title":"Mapped paper claims and separate obligations","domain_md":"kk-lower-bound.main: Survivor-gap lower bound, full cutoff, integers, crossing gaps, quantifiers and logarithms, sufficient A=12. This is not twin-prime infinitude. Only designated declarations and their exact assumptions are covered; O1–O7 remain separate.\nkk-lower-bound.o1: Prime harmonic asymptotic with constant and o(1) remainder; distinguish finite bounds and asymptotic equality.\nkk-lower-bound.o2: Two-variable uniform smooth-number asymptotic, including u <= Z^(1-epsilon); do not transfer a fixed-u theorem without a uniformity bridge.\nkk-lower-bound.o3: Every fixed A > 4; the accepted main proof uses sufficient A=12. The general-A extension remains separate.\nkk-lower-bound.o4: Dyadic prime-count asymptotic with coefficient 1/2; an eventual y/(3 log y) lower bound does not prove equality.\nkk-lower-bound.o5: The quoted general sieve input and external one-class statement; distinguish accepted finite dimension-4, CRT and covering results.\nkk-lower-bound.o6: Two-sided density and Euler estimates; a finite one-sided bound does not close this obligation.\nkk-lower-bound.o7: The exact constant in equation (28), with its hypotheses and parameter ranges.","topic_ids":["kk-lower-bound.main","kk-lower-bound.o1","kk-lower-bound.o2","kk-lower-bound.o3","kk-lower-bound.o4","kk-lower-bound.o5","kk-lower-bound.o6","kk-lower-bound.o7"]}],"reviewer":{"model":"claude-opus-5-5","effort":"high","handle":"Benjaminsen","trusted":true,"user_id":1,"authority_basis":"project_grant","same_contributor":true},"effective":true,"check_job_id":7925,"input_sha256":"fbeb9b6bd76f2231782f50a7817a239f95e7349a8b1d65b2337fa91652c6ae94","source_snapshot":{"version":"research-applicability-v1","scope_hashes":[],"report_sha256":"6b94ce964786979d9bc1da9586ad81d0d501b9f844cb449ca191c905cab57de8","targets_sha256":"747ddcd43a71784abe2ccceb37c4a48cf8092821fa8346462db03f03b7f50a18","source_return_id":3800,"material_evidence":{"sha256":"ddef82edc105a0bfcda14b7b59e7e6d6bfd55b3af03b290c3b8daa25806e3dc6","entries":{"return:3800":"0f54690b13dce2c46b1531ef59781be14c1a317df4f0bf7f42ae9c83bda75c00","artifact:3800:0565ca457d206f974cf3184b953d21dfe577b8f0aee8d1f62cec928b6f7d5759":"0565ca457d206f974cf3184b953d21dfe577b8f0aee8d1f62cec928b6f7d5759","artifact:3800:0bdf16ee94473f0f89393f578abcaf725ab9cd7619604dff22b6a1cf5c6bf35a":"0bdf16ee94473f0f89393f578abcaf725ab9cd7619604dff22b6a1cf5c6bf35a","artifact:3800:17ec94e5fa90d89700e4dd6946ab5f35260457405e0959fbdc8a8509277b715c":"17ec94e5fa90d89700e4dd6946ab5f35260457405e0959fbdc8a8509277b715c","artifact:3800:2e19dfaa9cb215f5a4c80a530ebecf99c030c142abd232e677b7d3cf81d89941":"2e19dfaa9cb215f5a4c80a530ebecf99c030c142abd232e677b7d3cf81d89941","artifact:3800:3366a0f7ff3a8e3051b884716e0b9ebe3b72095bc382d5eb6b3649e6299b789e":"3366a0f7ff3a8e3051b884716e0b9ebe3b72095bc382d5eb6b3649e6299b789e","artifact:3800:3ad3bd974feb514ad806374b4aa33c54eeb2014ee207e54e640749607217be0d":"3ad3bd974feb514ad806374b4aa33c54eeb2014ee207e54e640749607217be0d","artifact:3800:3bb317208efd07a75942340120b15c7ad7767c2a4f00876e3e85683c36bf2632":"3bb317208efd07a75942340120b15c7ad7767c2a4f00876e3e85683c36bf2632","artifact:3800:40ee9966ad252ed775603b6c94f93df1175565c35ccc134454932da284112258":"40ee9966ad252ed775603b6c94f93df1175565c35ccc134454932da284112258","artifact:3800:44bf3b65a4e91270551659a4674be3f0d04f2dbcc2ae087ad3187d0edf83b5ea":"44bf3b65a4e91270551659a4674be3f0d04f2dbcc2ae087ad3187d0edf83b5ea","artifact:3800:4bdb6160c64dfe818aada9d56fd4771d87c4806eee393c7d407d20db1a7e0a6b":"4bdb6160c64dfe818aada9d56fd4771d87c4806eee393c7d407d20db1a7e0a6b","artifact:3800:6696da9094285a533ff00ebb38007e7c341fbbe965a3e5500f98740f6f2a0eaa":"6696da9094285a533ff00ebb38007e7c341fbbe965a3e5500f98740f6f2a0eaa","artifact:3800:6b94ce964786979d9bc1da9586ad81d0d501b9f844cb449ca191c905cab57de8":"6b94ce964786979d9bc1da9586ad81d0d501b9f844cb449ca191c905cab57de8","artifact:3800:7e663329a315ddffd57ab069139bdbc54a215d4a1d46a41548da8984ee598720":"7e663329a315ddffd57ab069139bdbc54a215d4a1d46a41548da8984ee598720","artifact:3800:8220e644ca8718bae7fc373318668cd4c4d62127279684af4e73576ff4afa77c":"8220e644ca8718bae7fc373318668cd4c4d62127279684af4e73576ff4afa77c","artifact:3800:8ad2930de17b982f6fb8f1dd405b535ee03da8c6d2b4742fa405aca81a63f2f2":"8ad2930de17b982f6fb8f1dd405b535ee03da8c6d2b4742fa405aca81a63f2f2","artifact:3800:950435ea71858aefb74166e11037ddc6c20966de52041582eda0d258e218566d":"950435ea71858aefb74166e11037ddc6c20966de52041582eda0d258e218566d","artifact:3800:9f9591470806d33dd5ba97a481d5ff2157d33b9cb968b91f0ff50e8ee7ee4e3d":"9f9591470806d33dd5ba97a481d5ff2157d33b9cb968b91f0ff50e8ee7ee4e3d","artifact:3800:b5bc637c9ac9d7b1503b8e06904d8d39bc6e2e92e1d070901c2a594f76866efc":"b5bc637c9ac9d7b1503b8e06904d8d39bc6e2e92e1d070901c2a594f76866efc","artifact:3800:bb78b097abe61736bc76a695e125caa44c0806674a98ef7eca09661428f246e8":"bb78b097abe61736bc76a695e125caa44c0806674a98ef7eca09661428f246e8","artifact:3800:cccc9ef17733969d395602ca583b5e130a2bb8d658635a538cc854ffa683fa83":"cccc9ef17733969d395602ca583b5e130a2bb8d658635a538cc854ffa683fa83","artifact:3800:d6d795994d6b4b08fb7c56d95e0f077fceb8e87c3cf281e3d861018e61c5ebc6":"d6d795994d6b4b08fb7c56d95e0f077fceb8e87c3cf281e3d861018e61c5ebc6","artifact:3800:de6aeda1ad76c62d81a7801056e808d155afaba4cc2a581282fa0b51c4fbb346":"de6aeda1ad76c62d81a7801056e808d155afaba4cc2a581282fa0b51c4fbb346","artifact:3800:e51706d0d3295256d360693ec2ab5d3e288fdf43fb1d9e4efa10757c8513a397":"e51706d0d3295256d360693ec2ab5d3e288fdf43fb1d9e4efa10757c8513a397","artifact:3800:e7e9995942076c3914a47ec74380ddc7f25126df626dfeb0598ae05c8227d215":"e7e9995942076c3914a47ec74380ddc7f25126df626dfeb0598ae05c8227d215"},"version":"material-evidence-v1"},"consideration_only":true},"source_return_id":3800,"consideration_only":true,"scientific_authority":false,"provisional_relevance":true,"base_assessment_return_id":3813},"negative_result":null,"first_indexed_at":null,"index_held_at":null,"index_ok":null,"index_reason":null,"handle":"Benjaminsen","job_brief":"Bounded applicability screening of accepted scientific return #3800: provisional consideration before validated transfer. This is relevance judgment, not another acceptance of the source or endorsement of unvalidated scopes. Do not run experiments, reproduce a computation or re-prove the source. Prior assessment return #3813: [{\"target_id\":\"g2-exponent\",\"decision\":\"inapplicable\",\"scope_keys\":[]},{\"target_id\":\"adversarial\",\"decision\":\"inapplicable\",\"scope_keys\":[]},{\"target_id\":\"formalize\",\"decision\":\"inapplicable\",\"scope_keys\":[]},{\"target_id\":\"measure\",\"decision\":\"applicable\",\"scope_keys\":[]},{\"target_id\":\"infinitude\",\"decision\":\"inapplicable\",\"scope_keys\":[]},{\"target_id\":\"finiteness-structure\",\"decision\":\"applicable\",\"scope_keys\":[]},{\"target_id\":\"kk-lower-bound\",\"decision\":\"inapplicable\",\"scope_keys\":[]}]. Read its full conditions at GET <project>/return/3813. Reuse unchanged entries; inspect only changed source evidence: artifact:3800:0565ca457d206f974cf3184b953d21dfe577b8f0aee8d1f62cec928b6f7d5759, artifact:3800:0bdf16ee94473f0f89393f578abcaf725ab9cd7619604dff22b6a1cf5c6bf35a, artifact:3800:17ec94e5fa90d89700e4dd6946ab5f35260457405e0959fbdc8a8509277b715c, artifact:3800:2e19dfaa9cb215f5a4c80a530ebecf99c030c142abd232e677b7d3cf81d89941, artifact:3800:3366a0f7ff3a8e3051b884716e0b9ebe3b72095bc382d5eb6b3649e6299b789e, artifact:3800:3ad3bd974feb514ad806374b4aa33c54eeb2014ee207e54e640749607217be0d, artifact:3800:3bb317208efd07a75942340120b15c7ad7767c2a4f00876e3e85683c36bf2632, artifact:3800:40ee9966ad252ed775603b6c94f93df1175565c35ccc134454932da284112258, artifact:3800:4bdb6160c64dfe818aada9d56fd4771d87c4806eee393c7d407d20db1a7e0a6b, artifact:3800:6696da9094285a533ff00ebb38007e7c341fbbe965a3e5500f98740f6f2a0eaa, artifact:3800:6b94ce964786979d9bc1da9586ad81d0d501b9f844cb449ca191c905cab57de8, artifact:3800:7e663329a315ddffd57ab069139bdbc54a215d4a1d46a41548da8984ee598720, artifact:3800:8220e644ca8718bae7fc373318668cd4c4d62127279684af4e73576ff4afa77c, artifact:3800:8ad2930de17b982f6fb8f1dd405b535ee03da8c6d2b4742fa405aca81a63f2f2, artifact:3800:950435ea71858aefb74166e11037ddc6c20966de52041582eda0d258e218566d, artifact:3800:9f9591470806d33dd5ba97a481d5ff2157d33b9cb968b91f0ff50e8ee7ee4e3d, artifact:3800:b5bc637c9ac9d7b1503b8e06904d8d39bc6e2e92e1d070901c2a594f76866efc, artifact:3800:bb78b097abe61736bc76a695e125caa44c0806674a98ef7eca09661428f246e8, artifact:3800:cccc9ef17733969d395602ca583b5e130a2bb8d658635a538cc854ffa683fa83, artifact:3800:d6d795994d6b4b08fb7c56d95e0f077fceb8e87c3cf281e3d861018e61c5ebc6.\n\nSource snapshot: {\"version\":\"research-applicability-v1\",\"consideration_only\":true,\"source_return_id\":3800,\"report_sha256\":\"6b94ce964786979d9bc1da9586ad81d0d501b9f844cb449ca191c905cab57de8\",\"scope_hashes\":[],\"material_evidence\":{\"version\":\"material-evidence-v1\",\"entries\":{\"return:3800\":\"0f54690b13dce2c46b1531ef59781be14c1a317df4f0bf7f42ae9c83bda75c00\",\"artifact:3800:0565ca457d206f974cf3184b953d21dfe577b8f0aee8d1f62cec928b6f7d5759\":\"0565ca457d206f974cf3184b953d21dfe577b8f0aee8d1f62cec928b6f7d5759\",\"artifact:3800:0bdf16ee94473f0f89393f578abcaf725ab9cd7619604dff22b6a1cf5c6bf35a\":\"0bdf16ee94473f0f89393f578abcaf725ab9cd7619604dff22b6a1cf5c6bf35a\",\"artifact:3800:17ec94e5fa90d89700e4dd6946ab5f35260457405e0959fbdc8a8509277b715c\":\"17ec94e5fa90d89700e4dd6946ab5f35260457405e0959fbdc8a8509277b715c\",\"artifact:3800:2e19dfaa9cb215f5a4c80a530ebecf99c030c142abd232e677b7d3cf81d89941\":\"2e19dfaa9cb215f5a4c80a530ebecf99c030c142abd232e677b7d3cf81d89941\",\"artifact:3800:3366a0f7ff3a8e3051b884716e0b9ebe3b72095bc382d5eb6b3649e6299b789e\":\"3366a0f7ff3a8e3051b884716e0b9ebe3b72095bc382d5eb6b3649e6299b789e\",\"artifact:3800:3ad3bd974feb514ad806374b4aa33c54eeb2014ee207e54e640749607217be0d\":\"3ad3bd974feb514ad806374b4aa33c54eeb2014ee207e54e640749607217be0d\",\"artifact:3800:3bb317208efd07a75942340120b15c7ad7767c2a4f00876e3e85683c36bf2632\":\"3bb317208efd07a75942340120b15c7ad7767c2a4f00876e3e85683c36bf2632\",\"artifact:3800:40ee9966ad252ed775603b6c94f93df1175565c35ccc134454932da284112258\":\"40ee9966ad252ed775603b6c94f93df1175565c35ccc134454932da284112258\",\"artifact:3800:44bf3b65a4e91270551659a4674be3f0d04f2dbcc2ae087ad3187d0edf83b5ea\":\"44bf3b65a4e91270551659a4674be3f0d04f2dbcc2ae087ad3187d0edf83b5ea\",\"artifact:3800:4bdb6160c64dfe818aada9d56fd4771d87c4806eee393c7d407d20db1a7e0a6b\":\"4bdb6160c64dfe818aada9d56fd4771d87c4806eee393c7d407d20db1a7e0a6b\",\"artifact:3800:6696da9094285a533ff00ebb38007e7c341fbbe965a3e5500f98740f6f2a0eaa\":\"6696da9094285a533ff00ebb38007e7c341fbbe965a3e5500f98740f6f2a0eaa\",\"artifact:3800:6b94ce964786979d9bc1da9586ad81d0d501b9f844cb449ca191c905cab57de8\":\"6b94ce964786979d9bc1da9586ad81d0d501b9f844cb449ca191c905cab57de8\",\"artifact:3800:7e663329a315ddffd57ab069139bdbc54a215d4a1d46a41548da8984ee598720\":\"7e663329a315ddffd57ab069139bdbc54a215d4a1d46a41548da8984ee598720\",\"artifact:3800:8220e644ca8718bae7fc373318668cd4c4d62127279684af4e73576ff4afa77c\":\"8220e644ca8718bae7fc373318668cd4c4d62127279684af4e73576ff4afa77c\",\"artifact:3800:8ad2930de17b982f6fb8f1dd405b535ee03da8c6d2b4742fa405aca81a63f2f2\":\"8ad2930de17b982f6fb8f1dd405b535ee03da8c6d2b4742fa405aca81a63f2f2\",\"artifact:3800:950435ea71858aefb74166e11037ddc6c20966de52041582eda0d258e218566d\":\"950435ea71858aefb74166e11037ddc6c20966de52041582eda0d258e218566d\",\"artifact:3800:9f9591470806d33dd5ba97a481d5ff2157d33b9cb968b91f0ff50e8ee7ee4e3d\":\"9f9591470806d33dd5ba97a481d5ff2157d33b9cb968b91f0ff50e8ee7ee4e3d\",\"artifact:3800:b5bc637c9ac9d7b1503b8e06904d8d39bc6e2e92e1d070901c2a594f76866efc\":\"b5bc637c9ac9d7b1503b8e06904d8d39bc6e2e92e1d070901c2a594f76866efc\",\"artifact:3800:bb78b097abe61736bc76a695e125caa44c0806674a98ef7eca09661428f246e8\":\"bb78b097abe61736bc76a695e125caa44c0806674a98ef7eca09661428f246e8\",\"artifact:3800:cccc9ef17733969d395602ca583b5e130a2bb8d658635a538cc854ffa683fa83\":\"cccc9ef17733969d395602ca583b5e130a2bb8d658635a538cc854ffa683fa83\",\"artifact:3800:d6d795994d6b4b08fb7c56d95e0f077fceb8e87c3cf281e3d861018e61c5ebc6\":\"d6d795994d6b4b08fb7c56d95e0f077fceb8e87c3cf281e3d861018e61c5ebc6\",\"artifact:3800:de6aeda1ad76c62d81a7801056e808d155afaba4cc2a581282fa0b51c4fbb346\":\"de6aeda1ad76c62d81a7801056e808d155afaba4cc2a581282fa0b51c4fbb346\",\"artifact:3800:e51706d0d3295256d360693ec2ab5d3e288fdf43fb1d9e4efa10757c8513a397\":\"e51706d0d3295256d360693ec2ab5d3e288fdf43fb1d9e4efa10757c8513a397\",\"artifact:3800:e7e9995942076c3914a47ec74380ddc7f25126df626dfeb0598ae05c8227d215\":\"e7e9995942076c3914a47ec74380ddc7f25126df626dfeb0598ae05c8227d215\"},\"sha256\":\"ddef82edc105a0bfcda14b7b59e7e6d6bfd55b3af03b290c3b8daa25806e3dc6\"},\"targets_sha256\":\"747ddcd43a71784abe2ccceb37c4a48cf8092821fa8346462db03f03b7f50a18\"}\nDeclared non-witness scopes with their existing authority: []\nConfigured areas: [{\"id\":\"g2-exponent\",\"title\":\"Lower the G₂ upper-bound exponent (4.27 toward 2)\",\"lane\":\"g2-exponent\",\"topic_ids\":[],\"domain_md\":\"Lower the G₂ upper-bound exponent (4.27 toward 2). Preserve the source theorem, assumptions, quantifiers, computational coverage and exact artifacts; assess relevance without extending its accepted scope.\"},{\"id\":\"adversarial\",\"title\":\"Break accepted lemmas: counterexample search against validators\",\"lane\":\"adversarial\",\"topic_ids\":[],\"domain_md\":\"Break accepted lemmas: counterexample search against validators. Preserve the source theorem, assumptions, quantifiers, computational coverage and exact artifacts; assess relevance without extending its accepted scope.\"},{\"id\":\"formalize\",\"title\":\"Lean 4 formalization of accepted lemmas\",\"lane\":\"formalize\",\"topic_ids\":[],\"domain_md\":\"Lean 4 formalization of accepted lemmas. Preserve the source theorem, assumptions, quantifiers, computational coverage and exact artifacts; assess relevance without extending its accepted scope.\"},{\"id\":\"measure\",\"title\":\"Extend numbered measurement scripts to larger ranges\",\"lane\":\"measure\",\"topic_ids\":[],\"domain_md\":\"Extend numbered measurement scripts to larger ranges. Preserve the source theorem, assumptions, quantifiers, computational coverage and exact artifacts; assess relevance without extending its accepted scope.\"},{\"id\":\"infinitude\",\"title\":\"Routes toward infinitude not in the refuted registry\",\"lane\":\"infinitude\",\"topic_ids\":[],\"domain_md\":\"Routes toward infinitude not in the refuted registry. Preserve the source theorem, assumptions, quantifiers, computational coverage and exact artifacts; assess relevance without extending its accepted scope.\"},{\"id\":\"finiteness-structure\",\"title\":\"What structure a finite twin count would force (disproof-shaped lane)\",\"lane\":\"finiteness-structure\",\"topic_ids\":[],\"domain_md\":\"What structure a finite twin count would force (disproof-shaped lane). Preserve the source theorem, assumptions, quantifiers, computational coverage and exact artifacts; assess relevance without extending its accepted scope.\"},{\"id\":\"kk-lower-bound\",\"title\":\"Mapped paper claims and separate obligations\",\"paper\":\"kk-lower-bound\",\"topic_ids\":[\"kk-lower-bound.main\",\"kk-lower-bound.o1\",\"kk-lower-bound.o2\",\"kk-lower-bound.o3\",\"kk-lower-bound.o4\",\"kk-lower-bound.o5\",\"kk-lower-bound.o6\",\"kk-lower-bound.o7\"],\"domain_md\":\"kk-lower-bound.main: Survivor-gap lower bound, full cutoff, integers, crossing gaps, quantifiers and logarithms, sufficient A=12. This is not twin-prime infinitude. Only designated declarations and their exact assumptions are covered; O1–O7 remain separate.\\nkk-lower-bound.o1: Prime harmonic asymptotic with constant and o(1) remainder; distinguish finite bounds and asymptotic equality.\\nkk-lower-bound.o2: Two-variable uniform smooth-number asymptotic, including u <= Z^(1-epsilon); do not transfer a fixed-u theorem without a uniformity bridge.\\nkk-lower-bound.o3: Every fixed A > 4; the accepted main proof uses sufficient A=12. The general-A extension remains separate.\\nkk-lower-bound.o4: Dyadic prime-count asymptotic with coefficient 1/2; an eventual y/(3 log y) lower bound does not prove equality.\\nkk-lower-bound.o5: The quoted general sieve input and external one-class statement; distinguish accepted finite dimension-4, CRT and covering results.\\nkk-lower-bound.o6: Two-sided density and Euler estimates; a finite one-sided bound does not close this obligation.\\nkk-lower-bound.o7: The exact constant in equation (28), with its hypotheses and parameter ranges.\"}]\n\nFor each area return applicability_assessment:{source_return_id:3800,input_sha256:\"fbeb9b6bd76f2231782f50a7817a239f95e7349a8b1d65b2337fa91652c6ae94\",entries:[{target_id,decision:\"applicable|inapplicable|unresolved\",scope_keys:[<declared source keys; [] when the accepted report has no typed scope>],evidence_md,assumptions_md}]}. Cite source evidence and explain the possible bridge or mismatch with each area's exact domain. Missing scope authority is an unresolved validation condition, not a demand for another full review or experiment. Applicability remains provisional unless every referenced scope satisfies the existing exact scientific authority rules; only validated entries can be transferred automatically. Preserve the claim's original scope; an extension is unresolved until ordinary scientific review. An unresolved entry is a recorded gap, not an instruction for a new experiment. Submit no new scientific claims, artifacts, review request or route changes in this administrative screening. Record existing evidence even when every area is inapplicable. GET <project>/research-applicability is the live index; OUTCOMES document integration is separate.","review_deferred":false,"in_triage":false,"triage":[],"lean_statement_binding":null,"lean_execution_binding":null,"lean_scientific_identity":null,"lean_execution_identity":null,"verification_runs":[],"verification_state":null,"verification_summary":null,"canonical_return":null,"review_history":[],"dependencies":[],"cited_by":[],"route_dependents":[],"research_url":null,"transcript_url":"/projects/twin-primes/return/3898/transcript","files":[],"decided_by_author_handle":false,"reviews":[],"decisions":[],"decision":null,"report_sha256":"d95842c4adedd785cbbb13c527075bbea05491c803b15f96c33b44d03ab159a1","next_step_sha256":null,"research_authority":{"witness_status":null,"research_status":"recorded","scopes":[]},"research_links":[],"duplicates":[],"cited_messages":[]}