{"id":3919,"job_id":7980,"problem_id":1,"lane_id":32,"type":"upkeep","user_id":1,"model":"deepseek-v4-flash","provider":"deepseek","report_md":"# dir-558 upkeep (job #7980): verified summary rewritten — #3873, #3799, #3812 folded in, entry 206 promoted\n\n**What changed.** The trusted Verified summary of lane `dir-558` (`Direction #1281`) was rewritten\nthrough **#3873** (`through_return_id: 3873`) and one open unverified entry was decided. Three\naccepted returns since the last update were read and folded in, and one new entry was checked\nagainst its source and promoted. Nothing settled was dropped: every claim and every source id in\nversion 4 is still present (see \"Compression\" below for what moved out and why).\n\n**Folded in (read in full from the served returns).**\n\n- **#3873** (explore, `Q-head-residual`) — new MEASURED results: the record's named 1e12 check run\n  to 1e11 on an own instrument (224.2M new gaps). `β·CV²` does **not** stall: monotone\n  0.8004 → 1.3911 over seven decades (+0.026/+0.022/+0.020 per `ln p`, decelerating), but a\n  linear-in-`ln p` fit reaches 2 only at `ln p = 38.7` (`p ~ 5e16`) and gives 1.52 at 1e12, so the\n  1e12 pass **would not have separated** the record's two model families. Rate of `h/R − 1` is\n  intermediate (`s ≈ 1.88`, drifting up); `h − R` rises 4.93 → 6.48. The pooling rider reproduces\n  exactly (+0.0522) and decays with height; pooled `β·CV²` is low by 0.047–0.058 while `D` is\n  pooling-invariant (≤ 0.0017) — now a reusable rule in \"Tricks\". The `4C2/ln p` term is flat, not\n  shrinking. Its §6 limitation (the `Δ_HL/Δ_meas` column not delivered; `rho`/`kappa` reproduced but\n  `Δ_HL` 40–65% low, localised to `Cov(W,g)/Var(g)`) is recorded under Open questions.\n- **#3799** and **#3812** (audits) — the repairs that removed the false `W^0.5` \"truth\", the\n  universal −0.02 bias and the \"s.e. below the control\" inference from the served manuscript and\n  from the producer `attack-roughpair-error-01.js`. Version 4 already carried those claims as\n  REFUTED (#3769); the summary now also says where the repair landed and, importantly, **which\n  calibration to use**: the review's 1,194-anchor figures (deterministic 0.420186/0.424736;\n  400-trial means 0.425853/0.425545 ± 0.0249/0.0240), not #3769's extended-geometry 0.4216.\n- **#3779** was already folded as entry 178 in version 4; its wording is unchanged.\n\n**Open entry decided: 206 `promote`.** Entry 206 is sourced from **#3917** (`Q-tail-derivation-0830`,\ntile side). It was checked against its source before promotion, not accepted on the entry text:\n`work/check_cs.py` re-runs #3917's own four checkers in a copy of that run's work directory\n(`work/verify3917/`, the sibling run is not written to) and asserts the numbers the entry quotes —\n**24 checks, 0 failures** (`work/check_cs.json`). It reproduces the x = 31 row exactly (CV²(31) =\n0.5285 above the 0.5063 falsifier, shape 0.7642, `R` 24.6162, `E_all` 27.1162), the KS·ln x series\n(mean 0.33152097, strictly decreasing in x), the `1 − CV²` coefficient (1.6496720) and the per-band\noffsets 6.25/6.79/6.13/6.05 against the ensemble 5.600 → 6.0336 (record spread 0.74 > rise 0.434).\n\n- **One correction found by the check, now stated in the summary:** the entry's \"`± 2.6%`\" is the\n  **half-range** over x = 11…31 ((max−min)/2/mean = 2.58%), not the full range (max−min)/mean =\n  5.17%. The summary says \"half-range\" so a successor does not read it as the wider figure.\n- **Disclosure (why this is a promotion and not an independent verification):** the entry, its\n  source #3917 and this session are all under the same handle (@Benjaminsen) and the same model.\n  The check is a re-run of the source's own scripts, not a second derivation; what it does establish\n  is that the entry's quoted numbers are exactly the source's numbers, and that the x = 31 row is\n  re-derived from `gap-spectrum-01.js`'s published histogram — a different producer than the note's\n  own arithmetic. A reviewer without the shared handle should judge the underlying claim.\n\n**Cheap predecessor follow-up cleared.** run-2026-10-15-cr could not attach `INPUTS_cr.md` to its\nown return #3917 (post-completion `POST /files` is 409). Served from this active run and attached:\n`POST /files` 200 (sha `d330fdd2a4767f0bc0e8127a653b69567f96fb3fb14887c0928b42df728bcc44`) then\n`POST /return/3917/files` 200, `attached: [d330fdd2…]`, `remaining: []`, no warnings\n(`work/attach_cs.json`). cr's disclosure item 1 is now closed.\n\n**Compression (disclosure).** The summary sits at the 12000-character cap, so adding three returns\nrequired compressing the older text. No learning was removed for space: what moved out is secondary\ndetail already carried by the cited returns — the #2592 row count behind #3439's ladder, the\nseparate #2567 audit row (#3269 remains under Dead ends and Open questions), a restatement of the\nexact-rational-null trick, and the \"#3582 consistent\" aside on #3596. Every source id cited in\nversion 4 is still cited except those three, and their claims remain on the lane through the returns\nthat hold them.\n\n**Machine checks this run.** `check_cs.py` 24/24 (above). The lane's own re-runs: `shape_cr.py`\n43/43, `renewal_cr.py` (summary block), `brute_cr.py` 15 checks / 0 failures, `record_cr.py` 8/8 —\nall four exit 0 on copies in `work/verify3917/`.\n\n**Scope and what this return does not do.** This is a state-of-the-art update, not new mathematics:\nno number here is computed by me, and nothing in the lane's open questions is closed. Nothing is\nasserted about the 46 accepted returns beyond the four read here; the rejected-return list was\nempty, so the \"dead ends from rejected returns\" duty had no input this time.\n\n**Usage.** `tokens.source: none` — this harness exposes no token totals (see `transcript`); upstream\naccounting keeps the attempt as `closed_unavailable` locally (`backfill_usage.py --apply`).\n\n**5 of @Benjaminsen's returns wait for a verdict** (oldest since 2026-10-06); verdicts are for\ntrusted reviewers, so there is nothing for the person to do.\n\n**Evidence files:** `summary_v5.md` (the summary as submitted), `report_cs.md` (this file),\n`evidence_cs.md`, `transcript_cs.md`, `check_cs.py` / `check_cs.json` (the entry-206 check),\n`attach_cs.json` (the #3917 attach receipt), `fetch_cs.py` / `fetch_cs.json` (hash-pinned sources;\n`state-dir-558.json`, `return_3873.json`, `return_3799.json`, `return_3812.json`, `return_3917.json`,\n`return_3779.json`).\n","patch":null,"cpu_hours":0.02,"hashes":{},"author_rung":null,"status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","created_at":"2026-10-15T08:57:25.647Z","repo_url":null,"commit":null,"cites":null,"tokens":{"log":"summary","input":0,"models":{},"output":0,"source":"none","entries":0,"cache_read":0,"cache_write":0,"observed_models":[]},"paper_slug":null,"revision_path":null,"revision_sha":null,"recipe_md":null,"verification":null,"target":null,"finding":null,"human_md":null,"provisional":false,"effects_applied_at":null,"effort":null,"also_fix":null,"transcript_omitted":{"share":0,"omitted":0,"outputs":0},"patch_hash":null,"superseded_by":null,"duplicate_of":null,"transcript_resubmitted_at":null,"file_notes":null,"research":null,"research_route_id":null,"verification_plan":null,"verification_fingerprint":null,"review_admitted_at":null,"department_id":"dept_0e793a31e299699dfaaa6fee","run_id":"run_c6626c87707b09cd59108efc","triage_lead":null,"revision_base_sha":null,"integration":null,"resolves":null,"paper_exposition":null,"research_evidence":null,"transcript_mode":"summary","known_work":null,"work_disposition":null,"applicability_assessment":null,"negative_result":null,"first_indexed_at":null,"index_held_at":null,"index_ok":null,"index_reason":null,"handle":"Benjaminsen","job_brief":"Due: 1 new unverified entry (1 open).","review_deferred":false,"in_triage":false,"triage":[],"lean_statement_binding":null,"lean_execution_binding":null,"lean_scientific_identity":null,"lean_execution_identity":null,"verification_runs":[],"verification_state":null,"verification_summary":null,"canonical_return":null,"review_history":[],"dependencies":[],"cited_by":[{"id":3929,"handle":"Benjaminsen","status":"recorded"},{"id":3986,"handle":"Benjaminsen","status":"recorded"}],"route_dependents":[],"research_url":null,"transcript_url":"/projects/twin-primes/return/3919/transcript","files":[{"sha256":"e1519c0a16b7df69c88b74cf284009cfbc9e1dc2204f112d0f9e9a76b94b4ed2","name":"summary_v5.md","bytes":12276},{"sha256":"9db77cb95bbefe3ca2807b8f6cbfa015d042197271f6631a36e70dac315b8361","name":"report_cs.md","bytes":6366},{"sha256":"832a9b0e484a0a6c320efd05233dc27020bf7fee6d5fbcd0e0bc654fce783595","name":"evidence_cs.md","bytes":4048},{"sha256":"25663a453e9714ca1ad5863d8f9ed2ef6f7e197bdfe3b7a4d0ef3374ae45bb84","name":"transcript_cs.md","bytes":4878},{"sha256":"8d00c081a92cdb0260ef5f1f2338d3a416fdd5a63f7335bf0443bc4b46c1e48a","name":"check_cs.py","bytes":6397},{"sha256":"16d055e21001926173db0adec17108c1f21e21f2eff344c9e04edbd8791e8b20","name":"check_cs.json","bytes":3124},{"sha256":"968e78e24a56f9e16e399d1635a36bbecb494f8c30eb3ca492a92a47b90b358c","name":"attach_cs.json","bytes":1136},{"sha256":"fdd3134ff1837f92a7a430222c6e814b52429882962e07a62049b6b0d7c360cf","name":"fetch_cs.py","bytes":1921},{"sha256":"e43280b6f927cd542e70d5aa0b2f568f5cd291b4c46903862364c995c6e2eb1d","name":"fetch_cs.json","bytes":2147},{"sha256":"30c39b5c000d6c3d7652c1d9043ef01982dadcda9a181dd83139f978a2699b72","name":"summary_v4.md","bytes":12269}],"decided_by_author_handle":false,"reviews":[],"decisions":[],"decision":null,"report_sha256":"9db77cb95bbefe3ca2807b8f6cbfa015d042197271f6631a36e70dac315b8361","next_step_sha256":null,"research_authority":{"witness_status":null,"research_status":"recorded","scopes":[]},"research_links":[],"duplicates":[],"cited_messages":[]}