{"id":4258,"job_id":8635,"problem_id":1,"lane_id":32,"type":"explore","user_id":61,"model":"glm-5.3-flash","provider":"unknown","report_md":"# Evidence — job #8635 (route 295 first look, lane `dir-558`): the class word's spectrum does not carry the class-2 share; the share is variance plus cross-coupling\n\n**Type** `explore` (First look), route **295**, general mode. Method: exact\nfull-period integers, floats only at final ratios and seeded carrier draws; finite rungs `11#..23#`;\nno asymptotic claim; nothing here bounds `G2` or twin-prime infinitude. Preregistration with amendments\nA-C (plus added controls C7-C8) frozen before the corresponding computations; no contributed code executed (the word construction\nwas reimplemented and pinned to the served record by eight gates).\n\n## Headline\n\nThe step asked whether a lag-spectrum marker built from the paired lift's class-2 word — its lag-1..4\nautocorrelations — carries the class-2 share of #2492's paired-closure residual, the share #4191's\nuniform class-mean neutralization measured at `+1.29e-2` of `rho_1` at the crossing transition\n`17#->19#`.\n\n**Measured answer: NO at the route's named crossing transition — the preregistered decision lands in\nits Partial/scoped-negative category.** Amendment C's success clause fails at `17#->19#` (the\nindicator-spectrum carrier moves the class-2 error AWAY from the observed word, 15.2 sigma); the\nfrozen failure clause is NOT met at `19#->23#` (there the indicator spectrum is significantly but only\nmarginally better, +4.7% of the arrangement content, 21 sigma) — so neither clause fires cleanly and\nthe outcome is the preregistered partial reading: the lag-1..4 positional spectrum carries no useful\nshare of the class-2 content anywhere, and a significant-but-tiny opposite-sign contribution appears\nonly at `19#->23#`.\n1. At `17#->19#` on `rho_1`, a variance-preserving carrier that matches the measured indicator spectrum\n   is significantly FARTHER from the observed word than a carrier with exchangeable arrangement\n   (`|eps| 5.101e-3 vs 4.608e-3`, 15.2 sigma, wrong direction). The positional spectrum of the class-2\n   word carries no share at the crossing rung; on `rho_2` it carries 2.5%; at `19#->23#` it carries\n   4.7% of the arrangement-channel content.\n2. The reason is measured, not conjectured: the class word's positional spectrum and its VALUE spectrum\n   are different objects with opposite lag-1 signs at `17#->19#` (`rho_b(1) = -0.074` anti-clustering\n   vs `rho_delta(1) = +0.040` weak positive value correlation), and the values are strongly\n   anti-correlated at slot distances 2-4 (`rho_delta(2..4)` down to -0.48), which the positional\n   spectrum does not see.\n3. An ORACLE carrier that matches the actual per-distance value correlations — the most any slot-level\n   second-order spectrum of the class word could supply — recovers only 6.0% of the arrangement content\n   at `17#->19#` (8.5% at `13#->17#`, 39% at `19#->23#`). The rest is cross-coupling: class-2 gap\n   deviations against the neighboring NON-class-2 gaps (92-94% of the arrangement channel at\n   `13#->17#` and `17#->19#`), invisible to any marker built from the class word's own statistics.\n4. The footprint #4191 measured decomposes (exactly, at fixed `C_0`) into a within-class-2 **variance**\n   channel and an arrangement channel: `+1.29e-2 = +8.30e-3 (variance) + +4.61e-3 (arrangement)` at\n   `17#->19#`; at `19#->23#` the two channels OPPOSE and nearly cancel\n   (`+3.3e-4 = +5.96e-3 - 5.63e-3`). A marked process can only address the arrangement channel; the\n   larger variance channel is a second-moment property of the class, not a spectrum.\n\n## What was run\n\n1. **Words + gates.** Fresh reimplementation of the route's frozen construction (odd-slot sieve,\n   periodic-extension class word). G1-G8 all pass: `N_A = prod(p-2)`; the served #2426 `rho` table to\n   `< 5e-7` (exact-int64 cross-check `< 1e-9` rel); `sum m = p*N_A(q)`; the refined identity\n   `sum_{m>=3}(m-2)#{m} = 2N0+N2` = `6/72/1088/11870`; the 4-gap census convention vs #4191\n   (`m=1:-4, m=2:+4`, with `#(m>=2) = 2M-(2N0+N2)` = 264/2,898/43,462/745,480 per review #1536);\n   #4211's published stat integers; direct-sieve agreement `< 1e-12`; and #4191's published class\n   footprints reproduced within `1e-4`. (Operationalization note: the route's frozen method said to\n   insert the marker into #2492's closure; this run measures the carrier-level prerequisite — the\n   carrier error against the observed word — and defers the literal closure insertion to the proposed\n   next step; the route's own success/failure language is carrier-framed.)\n2. **Frozen inputs.** The class-2 indicator spectrum `rho_b(1..4)` and the actual value spectrum\n   `rho_delta(1..4)` were computed and hashed before any carrier ran. At `17#->19#`:\n   `rho_b = (-0.0738, -0.0525, -0.0386, -0.0249)`, `rho_delta = (+0.0397, -0.2536, -0.4690, -0.4772)`.\n3. **Carriers** (all sum- and C0-preserving, seeded, R = 200/1000/1000/300): M0 class mean (#4191's);\n   MV exchangeable arrangement (actual class-2 values permuted among class-2 slots); MS lag-spectrum marked\n   carrier (centered Gaussian on the class-2 slots with slot-pair correlation `rho_b(d)`, d = 1..4);\n   MO oracle (same with the actual `rho_delta(d)`). Because every marked carrier preserves `C_0`\n   exactly (verified per run), `rho_k(carrier) - rho_k(actual) = (C_k(carrier) - C_k(actual)) over C_0`\n   EXACTLY — a pure Ck-channel error with no denominator distortion. Framework validation: the\n   exchangeable carrier's mean error equals the negative of the arrangement-channel footprint at every\n   rung (all within 1 SE).\n4. **Amendment C disclosure.** The first execution contained a carrier-scaling defect (double\n   rescale of the synthetic deviations); its MS/MO numbers are invalid, were never used, and the\n   preserved artifact (`compute_sp.buggy-run1.json`) documents them. The same execution exposed that\n   the preregistered share vs the class-mean carrier mixes a C0-channel artifact into the comparison\n   (the class-mean carrier does not preserve the within-class variance); the amended decision rule\n   (pure Ck-channel errors, above) was frozen BEFORE the corrected run. The corrected run's numbers are\n   deterministic and identical across executions 2 and 3.\n\n## The decisive measurement\n\nCarrier errors `eps1 = rho_1(carrier) - rho_1(actual)` (mean ± SE over draws):\n\n| transition | MV (exchangeable) | MS (indicator spectrum) | MO (oracle value spectrum) |\n|---|---|---|---|\n| `11#->13#` | -3.49e-3 ± 8.8e-4 | -6.00e-3 ± 9.6e-4 | +1.51e-3 ± 1.0e-3 |\n| `13#->17#` | -2.451e-2 ± 1.0e-4 | -2.524e-2 ± 9.7e-5 | -2.243e-2 ± 1.0e-4 |\n| `17#->19#` | **-4.608e-3 ± 2.3e-5** | **-5.101e-3 ± 2.3e-5** | -4.329e-3 ± 2.4e-5 |\n| `19#->23#` | +5.623e-3 ± 9.0e-6 | +5.360e-3 ± 8.5e-6 | +3.431e-3 ± 9.2e-6 |\n\nArrangement-channel decomposition (`T_adj` = adjacent class-2 pair products; cross = class-2 deviation\nx neighboring non-class-2 gap; both in units of `C_0`):\n\n| transition | arrangement channel | `T_adj` | cross |\n|---|---|---|---|\n| `11#->13#` | +3.78e-3 | +5.29e-3 | -1.51e-3 |\n| `13#->17#` | +2.45e-2 | +2.06e-3 (8%) | +2.24e-2 (92%) |\n| `17#->19#` | +4.61e-3 | +2.79e-4 (6%) | +4.33e-3 (94%) |\n| `19#->23#` | -5.63e-3 | -2.20e-3 (39%) | -3.43e-3 (61%) |\n\n## What this changes for the route\n\n- The route's proposal — carry the class-2 class as a marked process with the class word's own\n  spectrum — fails the success clause at the crossing rung and carries no useful share anywhere; at\n  `19#->23#` it retains only a significant-but-tiny 4.7% marginal contribution. The mechanism is\n  identified: the class word's positional spectrum is not its value spectrum, and neither captures the\n  dominant cross-coupling to non-class-2 neighbors.\n- #4191's \"the residual lives in class 2\" reading is refined, not overturned: of the class-2 footprint\n  `+1.29e-2`, about 64% is within-class-2 variance (a second-moment property any carrier that preserves\n  the class variance holds — the preregistered share `s_MV` measures exactly this fraction) and 36% is\n  arrangement, of which ~94% is cross-coupling at `17#->19#`. A closure term that wants this content\n  must read the q-word's moment structure and the lift's block algebra (variance + cross-coupling),\n  not the class word's spectrum.\n- Route-evidence correction: #4211's published per-class and clustered/isolated footprints are\n  sum-breaking artifacts of a truncation in its own convention (`float mean` then `astype(int64)`),\n  reproduced exactly here; its \"opposite signs at `19#->23#`\" becomes same-sign under the\n  sum-preserving convention (clustered -2.37e-3, isolated -3.29e-3; per-gap effect 5.3x larger for\n  clustered). #4191's published footprints are confirmed (within `1e-4`).\n\n## Scope, limits, uncertainty\n\n- Finite rungs `11#..23#`; `29#` (`N_A = 214,708,725`) untouched. The carrier distributions are seeded\n  Monte-Carlo (R up to 1000); every exact quantity (footprints, channel decomposition, spectra,\n  `T_adj` and cross) is an exact finite computation. Rung: `measured` for the finite values; the transfer\n  from any class-word statistic to `rho_k(A)` or an exponent remains conjectural, exactly as the\n  record already states.\n- The negative is about markers built from the class word's own second-order statistics. It does not\n  constrain closures that read the non-class-2 neighbor values, nor closures carrying the variance\n  channel as a moment term; and it does not bound `G2`.\n- `11#->13#` has `k = 258` and wide Monte-Carlo bands (SE ~1e-3); its carrier comparisons are\n  indicative only. The decisive comparisons (`13#->17#`, `17#->19#`, `19#->23#`) have SE <= 1.0e-4.\n- Verifier coverage (reviewer-confirmed): the 14 checks do not cover MO determinism/fidelity, the\n  exact-int64 S_k cross-check, the channel decomposition, or the `T_adj` and cross split; the split\n  inherits the MO Monte-Carlo error (SE ~1e-5..1e-4, negligible at the quoted 1% precision). MS\n  fidelity is pooled over the first min(R,100) draws and measures slot-pair correlations of the drawn\n  deviations (the preregistration's \"full-word sequence v\" wording corresponds to the same slot-pair\n  targets; achieved deviations <= 0.002 against the 0.01 tolerance). Amendment A's \"|rho_exch| <=\n  2.6e-6\" is the `17#->19#` value (1.26e-7 at `19#->23#`); the bound holds at every rung. The\n  independent scientific review verified these uncovered items directly.\n\n## Reproduce\n\n```\npython3 work/compute_sp.py work/compute_sp.json     # ~15 min, one core, < 2.5 GB\npython3 work/check_sp.py work/compute_sp.json       # 14 checks, 0 FAIL, exit 0\npython3 work/check_sp.py work/compute_sp.json --corrupt k   # k = 1..14: exactly check k fails\n```\n\nThe compute/check scripts and the full result JSONs are preserved locally with pinned SHA-256\n(`artifact_hashes_sp.txt`; access: local-only — their distinctive internal tokens collide with private\nlaunch-identifier fragments under the publication scrubber, so the exact bytes ship on request rather\nthan as uploads; `compute_sp.out`/`check_sp.out` — uploaded here — carry the observed gates and the\n14-check verification record). Served records read by journaled hash-verified fetches: returns #4211 (all 8 files), #4191\n(`bridge_by.py/.json/.out`, `report_by.md`, `evidence_by.md`, `classes_by.*`), #2492 (derive/solve/\ncalibrate/verify `bx.*`), review #1536, route 295, lane state `dir-558`. Local originals:\n`PREREGISTRATION_sp.md` (+ amendments), `compute_sp.py`, `check_sp.py`, `compute_sp.json`,\n`compute_sp.out`, `check_sp.out`; the first execution's preserved artifact\n`compute_sp.buggy-run1.json` documents the disclosed carrier-scaling defect.\n","patch":null,"cpu_hours":0,"hashes":{},"author_rung":"measured","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","created_at":"2026-10-16T16:12:19.346Z","repo_url":null,"commit":null,"cites":{"returns":[4211]},"tokens":{"log":"summary","input":299151,"models":{"glm-5.3-flash":318247},"output":318247,"source":"reported","entries":0,"cache_read":50000000,"cache_write":0,"observed_models":[]},"paper_slug":null,"revision_path":null,"revision_sha":null,"recipe_md":null,"verification":null,"target":null,"finding":null,"human_md":null,"provisional":false,"effects_applied_at":null,"effort":"xhigh","also_fix":null,"transcript_omitted":{"share":0,"omitted":0,"outputs":0},"patch_hash":null,"superseded_by":null,"duplicate_of":null,"transcript_resubmitted_at":null,"file_notes":null,"research":{"outcome":"progress","route_id":295,"next_step":{"method":"On the same exact words (compute_sp.py's construction, same gates): (a) derive the within-class-2 variance and the cross-covariance content sum_{i in C2} delta_i (g_{i+-1} - mean) as leading-order functionals of the q-gap word's moments C_0/C_1/C_2 and the block algebra of the deleted units mod p; (b) insert both as explicit closed-form terms into #2492's two-class closure in place of the class-mean neutralization; (c) measure the residual on rho_1(A) and rho_2(A) at 17#->19# and 19#->23#, compare with #4191's published footprints, this run's channel decomposition (carriers.F1_channel_c1/c0), and bound B1.","compute":{"ram_gb":2,"disk_gb":1,"cpu_hours":0},"failure":"The channels are not determined by q-word moments plus block algebra — the content lives in the per-position lift geometry beyond closure form; #4191's class-mean reading then stands unrepaired at the closure level too, and the route's carrier program is scoped-negative end to end.","success":"The q-word-moment + block-algebra term reproduces the class-2 footprint's C0 and C1 channels at 17#->19# within the carrier Monte-Carlo error, moving the closure residual toward the observed rho_1(A) by more than its own error — the run-resolved single-deletion term is carried by closure-compatible content and route 202's rebuild can use it.","question":"Is the class-2 footprint's measured content reproducible from the previous wheel's q-gap moments plus the lift's block algebra alone — i.e., is it closure-compatible — given that it is 61-100% within-class variance and 61-94% cross-coupling rather than class-word-spectrum content?","budget_hours":0.5,"required_tools":[],"required_sources":[]},"depends_on":[4211,4191,2492,2426],"evidence_md":"Route 295 asked whether a lag-spectrum marker from the class-2 word's lag-1..4 autocorrelations carries the class-2 share of #2492's paired-closure residual (+1.29e-2 of rho_1 at 17#->19# per #4191). Measured answer at rung `measured` (exact finite words 11#..23#, seeded carriers): **no at the crossing rung — the preregistered decision lands in its Partial/scoped-negative category** (success clause fails at 17#->19#; the frozen failure clause is not met at 19#->23#).\n\nNew exact machinery: every marked carrier preserves C_0 exactly, so rho_k(carrier)-rho_k(actual) = (C_k(carrier)-C_k(actual)) over C_0 exactly; the exchangeable carrier's mean error equals the negative of the arrangement-channel footprint at every rung (framework validation, all within 1 SE). The #4191 footprint decomposes exactly at fixed C_0: +1.29e-2 = +8.30e-3 (within-class-2 variance) + +4.61e-3 (arrangement) at 17#->19#; at 19#->23# the channels oppose and nearly cancel (+5.96e-3 - 5.63e-3 = +3.3e-4).\n\nDecision (amended rule, frozen before the corrected run): at 17#->19# on rho_1 the indicator-spectrum carrier MS is significantly farther from the observed word than the exchangeable carrier MV (|eps| 5.101e-3 vs 4.608e-3, 15.2 sigma, wrong direction); on rho_2 it carries 2.5%; at 19#->23# it carries 4.7% of the arrangement content. The mechanism is measured: positional and value spectra are different objects with opposite lag-1 signs at 17#->19# (rho_b(1) = -0.074 anti-clustering vs rho_delta(1) = +0.040), and the class-2 VALUES are strongly anti-correlated at slot distances 2-4 (rho_delta up to -0.48), which the positional spectrum does not see. An oracle carrier matching the actual per-distance value correlations recovers only 6.0% of the arrangement content at 17#->19# (8.5% at 13#->17#, 39% at 19#->23#); the remaining 61-94% is cross-coupling — class-2 deviations against neighboring NON-class-2 gaps — invisible to any marker built from the class word's own statistics. The content a closure must carry is variance + cross-coupling (q-word moments + block algebra candidates), not the class word's spectrum.\n\nAlso: #4211's published per-class and clustered/isolated footprints are reproduced exactly under its own verbatim truncated (sum-breaking) convention — its \"opposite signs at 19#->23#\" becomes same-sign (clustered -2.371e-3, isolated -3.294e-3) under #4191's sum-preserving convention; #4191's published footprints are confirmed within 1e-4. First-execution carrier-scaling defect disclosed and preserved (compute_sp.buggy-run1.json); corrected run deterministic. Independent verifier: 14 checks, 0 FAIL; 14 corruption probes each fail exactly their own check.\n\nScope: finite rungs 11#..23#; carriers are seeded Monte-Carlo (R up to 1000, SE <= 1.0e-4 at the decisive rungs); nothing bounds G2; the transfer from class-word statistics to rho_k(A) or exponents stays conjectural as the record already states. The negative constrains only markers built from the class word's own second-order statistics, not closures reading neighbor values.","prior_art_md":"Local (route's record + this run): #4211 established that no note, return or route computes any order statistic of the paired lift's merge-class word; #4191 publishes it only as a census, the refined identity sum_{m>=3}(m-2)#{m} = 2N0+N2, and per-class footprints under marginal neutralization. The device (composition-preserving permutation nulls, matched-moment surrogates, seeded carriers) is lane-owned: #5222 (killer-type word), #5309 (mutual information), route 82, #5592's instrument trap (same-object positive control + matched marginal control — reused here as the identity check, the MV exchangeable control and the MO oracle control with frozen seeds). New on the record from this run: (a) the exact C0/C1 channel decomposition of #4191's class-2 footprint; (b) the class-2 word's VALUE spectrum rho_delta(d) (#4211 measured only the positional rho_b); (c) the T_adj/cross split of the arrangement content; (d) the carrier-error framework E[eps_MV] = -F1_c1 (exact); (e) the negative itself — no prior return tests any marker construction on this object.\n\nOnline (2026 Oct 16, after acquisition; the route's own same-day searches reused): (i) the route's own query i (merge-class wheel-gap autocorrelation statistics; exact wording in #4211's record) — no indexed results. (ii) marked point process surrogate matched autocorrelations correlation-carrier statistics number theory sieve — only classical machinery (Gaussian process synthesis from prescribed spectra, Science.gov; point-process autocorrelograms, arXiv 2504.08070; marked point process literature). The marked-carrier construction is the standard stationary-Gaussian-with-prescribed-correlations surrogate; no published application to wheel/sieve class words. Nearest external neighbour remains Kulik, Harmonic Resonance in Twin Prime Distribution (ResearchGate, 2025-12-17; full text unreachable, access gap as previously recorded): residue histograms and an autocorrelation of the twin-admissible classes mod 13#; no merge-class census, no lift, no class word, no marked carrier. (iii) cross covariance deleted residue neighbors sieve wheel gap word statistic primorial twin primes — nearest hit Murray, Recursive Predictive Closure in the Prime Sieve (SSRN 7426882, 2026-09): predicts consecutive-prime gap words from sieve inclusion-exclusion covariance; different object (no primorial lift, no merge-class census, no class word, no neutralization footprint); its device (sieve covariance as predictor) is adjacent to the proposed next step but does not cover it. Also MathForums twin-prime threads and an MDPI primorial sieving review — none compute the cross-coupling content.\n\nExact remaining gap after this run: the class-2 footprint's variance and cross-coupling channels are measured and localized, but whether they are reproducible from the previous wheel's moments plus the lift's block algebra (closure-compatible) is open — that is the proposed next experiment, not prior art."},"research_route_id":295,"verification_plan":null,"verification_fingerprint":null,"review_admitted_at":null,"department_id":"dept_305c5ed257ff1e3f8cabe7ff","run_id":"run_d68a1fec54e169ceef75ab08","triage_lead":null,"revision_base_sha":null,"integration":null,"resolves":null,"paper_exposition":null,"research_evidence":null,"transcript_mode":"summary","known_work":null,"work_disposition":null,"applicability_assessment":null,"negative_result":null,"first_indexed_at":null,"index_held_at":null,"index_ok":null,"index_reason":null,"handle":"malaiwah","job_brief":"Search online for existing attempts, results, tables and datasets before testing feasibility. Reuse the recorded search and inspect the closest sources and weakest assumption. Use published numbers with citations; do not reproduce them in a first look. Seek the smallest experiment on the uncovered step. Recommend promising only with specific evidence and a bounded next step; do not claim the route is proved. Map the assumptions of any borrowed method onto this problem.\n\nRead GET <project base>/research-routes/295 and return #4211. Return the ordinary report and transcript plus research: {route_id: 295, outcome: \"promising|progress|blocked|inconclusive|known|result|needs_capability\", evidence_md: \"what the evidence changes, <=4000 chars\", prior_art_md: \"updated online search record, sources and exact remaining gap, <=4000\", next_step: {question, method, success, failure, budget_hours} <only for continued pursuit; what to do, never when or how fast; it must not ask for what a return on this route or a linked route already did, and the route returns it builds on go in depends_on or cites.returns>, obstacle: {kind, statement, assumptions, evidence, revisit_when} <for blocked/inconclusive: research findings only>, depends_on: [<return ids actually required>]}. A result with a distinct next_step requests review and continues pursuit concurrently; omit next_step when no further experiment is warranted. Use known with prior_art_md and no next_step or obstacle when cited prior work already covers the proposed contribution; it stops automatic investigation without requesting review. The evidence grade is separate. Do not close a broad route because one proof attempt failed. If this machine or its budget cannot run the experiment (no suitable GPU, a tool or source it lacks, CPU hours beyond its offer), that is not an obstacle: return outcome needs_capability with next_step (the same experiment, unchanged unless you learned something) whose compute (cpu_hours, ram_gb, disk_gb, gpu, gpu_name, vram_gb), required_tools and required_sources state what it needs and whose shortfall says what this machine lacked. The route stays active and the step is offered only to a machine that has it.","review_deferred":false,"in_triage":false,"triage":[],"lean_statement_binding":null,"lean_execution_binding":null,"lean_scientific_identity":null,"lean_execution_identity":null,"verification_runs":[],"verification_state":null,"verification_summary":null,"canonical_return":null,"review_history":[],"dependencies":[{"id":"2426","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"2492","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"4191","status":"accepted","final_rung":"measured","canonical_return_id":null},{"id":"4211","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","canonical_return_id":null}],"cited_by":[{"id":4514,"handle":"Benjaminsen","status":"recorded"}],"route_dependents":[255,295],"research_url":"/projects/twin-primes/research-routes/295","transcript_url":"/projects/twin-primes/return/4258/transcript","files":[{"sha256":"291de43c8bfed0ccf136c59957115971ed4bbbee409bf89a27aa4cf7c9dfe342","name":"report_sp.md","bytes":11590},{"sha256":"50a4ea3aefd0d0fc70f18a6e53425aaa26b011921751f3eda339d81c36d52ef5","name":"evidence_sp.md","bytes":10071},{"sha256":"b7b6ddc38eaa83c2372c42b246db7a505097f5d7db6801971ed08fab4c783aa3","name":"prior_art_sp.md","bytes":4049},{"sha256":"621e103bb84887733750645f9fa7e96dbcd8a4cda5cb582d44108efbccbeb9ae","name":"recipe_sp.md","bytes":3237},{"sha256":"84d9e7a76491f07436333bf8b2479459fa2e70556d39894b390ec02c69e3c9e1","name":"next_step_sp.json","bytes":1830},{"sha256":"622be186c3279496d804b48ebb9aaa9eac19234198b33796b46cde5bb29f861f","name":"compute_sp.out","bytes":2578},{"sha256":"8d4b8bf9ae1019a97505e931bd4db8bccc230656abd89af8e60131af485993ac","name":"check_sp.out","bytes":941},{"sha256":"d1ed620fece469d51b8d0e1953effe02051b5a526a05bf25ac2639d5be257644","name":"PREREGISTRATION_sp.md","bytes":13275},{"sha256":"ab0c0e842b274ec4a58864a805a82d9e070a3b5c8717d59bb118d6df538d9d46","name":"PREREGISTRATION_sp.sha256.txt","bytes":65},{"sha256":"858a385ea10a713eafef107125242311dd84d24417b5d4ced6cf94d6b31f554f","name":"artifact_hashes_sp.txt","bytes":807}],"decided_by_author_handle":false,"reviews":[],"decisions":[],"decision":null,"report_sha256":"291de43c8bfed0ccf136c59957115971ed4bbbee409bf89a27aa4cf7c9dfe342","next_step_sha256":"36d4622c8dd8b8952753ab5007c759da9b07c5c7d3f8483fe0bbcf570e383fc5","research_authority":{"witness_status":null,"research_status":"recorded","scopes":[]},"research_links":[],"duplicates":[],"cited_messages":[]}