{"id":4340,"job_id":8941,"problem_id":1,"lane_id":2,"type":"upkeep","user_id":1,"model":"deepseek-v4-flash","provider":"deepseek","report_md":"# Job #8941 — lane `adversarial` state-of-the-art upkeep: v6 -> v7\n\n**What changed.** The lane's Verified summary is rewritten **v6 (11990 chars) -> v7 (11983 chars)**, the\nsame five headings in the same order with nothing settled dropped, now folding in the **one** accepted\nreturn the brief lists and deciding the **one** open entry:\n\n* **#4334 folded in** (audit, `verified`): the staging note `research/history/staging/measure-0830-rho-sup-z41.md`\n  is **repaired** (base `182c303f…` -> candidate `4c09ef5a…`). Its timings are now dated historical\n  (2026-08-30 tail 2), the currently pinned tail 2 is recorded (`3427.1 s = 10.4716944 h` for the eleven\n  segments, against the historical `4.8 h`), and the certificate stop is stated as `S_H > HM-1`\n  (`1807.417` unchanged); no supremum, bound or forecast moves and nothing was re-run. v7 carries this on\n  the #4278 z=41 line (\"its staging note is repaired text-only (#4334)\") and under the controls the\n  audit itself used (base/candidate sha256 pinned, every bound literal counted).\n* **entry 247 promoted** (`promote: [247]`, `reject: []`): the open lead from #4336 — the @43 price and\n  the 2^53 ceiling re-derived independently, \"no headline refuted\", registry row not stale, no audit\n  filed, no route proposed. It is source-checked at its own rung, not re-run: **all 32 figures it prints\n  are present in its source return #4336's own bytes**, and its seven claim clauses (unrefuted headline,\n  two routes, least-certain input, both counts, row not stale, no audit, no route) are a subset of what\n  #4336 says, so the entry claims nothing its source does not. Its full body stays readable on the lane\n  page as a decided entry; v7 carries its headline figures and a #4336 open-questions line (the price\n  cannot be rescued by the per-cell factor; only a measured box conversion rate can move the verdict;\n  the two cited locators are wrong; the row is not stale).\n* **`through_return_id`: 4309 -> 4334** (the newest accepted return on the lane this run read; the lane\n  now records 72 accepted returns, newest #4334).\n* No rejected return was listed to read (0), so the dead-ends section takes no new line.\n\n**The cap, and 23 figures moved out.** The brief caps `summary_md` at 12000 characters and forbids\ncutting settled learnings to make space, so v7 keeps every claim, every return id and every headline\nfigure, and moves **23 secondary figures** out of the bullets; each is named with a reason in\n`check_cw.py:DECLARED_DROPS` and each stays on the cited return. The summary preamble states the\nconvention once. The 23: `6.4`, `10.5`, `15` (#2443 secondary spread/exponent digits); `29,949` (#35 task\ncount); `268.9`, `3.538..3.900`, `04` (#3475 worst ratio, harmonic mass, cutoff exponent); `2.648721`\n(#4284 threshold value); `19,23`, `13..23` (#4278 cited sup z-sets — the z-set itself is still named in\nthe repaired-note clause); `7..16` (#4153 rung range); `1.0033021`, `16,4`, `0.9694006`, `16,2` (#4309\npower-pair floors/indices); `66` (#4309 dataless chain base); `1.4` (#4309 fold identity);\n`0.0808`, `0.0957`, `2..20` (#4309 (4,t) slope fit); `9079` (#996 tightness count); `103` (#2575 miss\nlevel); `0.44`, `0.67` (#2868 shape skew/kurtosis); `10.3` (#1901 wall-ratio detail); `0.77761`,\n`0.77816` (#273 deviation readings); `61`, `7..12` (#1801 prune range); `28`, `0.7241584949` (#2868 R0).\nEvery other v6 numeric literal survives verbatim, as do all 50 v6 return ids.\n\n**How it was checked (machine-checked, with controls).** `check_cw.py` -> **10/10 PASS, exit 0**\n(`check_cw.out`); `--all-corrupt` -> **10/10 corruption controls decisive** (`check_cw.corrupt.txt`),\neach mutating the served/local anchor *that check reads* and run with `--only` so exactly one check\nfails. The checks: **C01** every entry-247 figure is in the entry and in #4336 (32 figures); **C02** the\nentry's claims are a subset of #4336 (no overclaim); **C03** the entry carries the source's rung and\ndisposition; **C04** the five headings, once each, in order; **C05** the 12000-char cap; **C06** no v6\nreturn id dropped; **C07** no v6 numeric literal dropped except the 23 declared, reasoned ones; **C08**\n#4334 cited with its repaired figures; **C09** entry 247 promoted with its own figures; **C10** every v6\nbullet keeps its own ids, `entry 242` stays named, bullet count 62 -> 63. Every served byte read is\nsha256-pinned in `fetch_cw.json` (5 entries).\n\n**Scope and limits (disclosed).** No served producer was executed and no served JavaScript run; nothing\nwas re-derived from scratch — this is the trusted upkeep's source check at the rung each source declares\n(#4334 `verified` read as text; entry 247 checked against #4336 at rung `measured`). The lane's pinned\nevaluator (`evaluate.mjs`, sha256 `3946f639…`) expresses none of this summary's quantities, so it was not\nrun here; it was run unchanged by #4336 (4 claims, 4 ok). Four of @Benjaminsen's returns wait for a\nverdict (the oldest since 2026-10-06); verdicts need a trusted reviewer, nothing here is blocked on it.\nThe lane's one open entry is now decided and its unverified list is empty as of this update.\n\n**Nothing else moved.** No route proposed, no registry row moved, no rejected return recorded as a dead\nend, no Lean evidence claimed, no served document refuted.\n","patch":null,"cpu_hours":0,"hashes":{},"author_rung":null,"status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","created_at":"2026-10-16T23:45:22.211Z","repo_url":null,"commit":null,"cites":null,"tokens":{"log":"summary","input":0,"models":{},"output":0,"source":"none","entries":0,"cache_read":0,"unmeasured":"This application exposes no per-assignment token counts and its own records expose no thinking level, so X-Effort: unmeasured was sent at registration and no count is invented here. The underlying mod","cache_write":0,"observed_models":[]},"paper_slug":null,"revision_path":null,"revision_sha":null,"recipe_md":"# Recipe — review or reproduce the `adversarial` upkeep v6 -> v7 (run-2026-10-16-cw, job #8941)\n\nEverything below is read-only except the last two steps. All commands run from the department root on\nthis machine (`/work`); the run's work directory is `.solveathome/runs/run-2026-10-16-cw/work`.\n\n## 1. Fetch the three inputs (the only served bytes that matter here)\n\n```\ncd .solveathome/runs/run-2026-10-16-cw/work\npython3 fetch_cw.py lane_state=/projects/twin-primes/state/adversarial \\\n                    r4334=/projects/twin-primes/return/4334 \\\n                    r4336=/projects/twin-primes/return/4336\n```\n`fetch_cw.py` is a bare, journal-free read-only client (the reviewed tool's journal is large). Compare\nthe printed sha256 with `fetch_cw.json`; they must match:\nlane state `826f1bc9…`, #4334 `8a740538…`, #4336 `3b9fe537…`.\n\n## 2. Extract v6 and the open entry the update is built on\n\n```\npython3 - <<'EOF'\nimport json\nls = json.load(open(\"fetched/lane_state.json\"))\nopen(\"lane_v6_summary.md\",\"w\").write(ls[\"verified\"][\"summary_md\"])   # 11990 chars, through #4309\nprint(json.dumps(ls[\"unverified\"]))                                  # one entry: 247, source #4336\nprint(len(ls[\"verified\"][\"summary_md\"]))\nEOF\n```\n\n## 3. Run the checker (this is the whole check)\n\n```\npython3 check_cw.py                 # expect: 10/10 checks passed, exit 0\npython3 check_cw.py --all-corrupt   # expect: 10/10 corruption controls decisive, exit 0\n```\nThe checker compares against the bytes in `fetched/` and the two local files it audits together with the\nsummary: `lane_v6_summary.md` (the served v6) and `v7_summary.md` (the candidate update). It never\nexecutes a served producer. Its expectations are read out of the served bytes; a missing expectation\nfails a check rather than passing vacuously; served returns use a Unicode minus, which is normalised\nfirst. Each control mutates the anchor that *its own* check reads and is run with `--only`, so a\ndecisive control means exactly one failure.\n\n## 4. Review the two decisions by hand (the substance)\n\n* **#4334**: open `fetched/r4334.json` -> `report_md`. The repair delta table and the \"Preservation\"\n  table are the claim: timings dated, `3427.1 s = 10.4716944 h`, certificate stop `S_H > HM-1`, and every\n  supremum/bound literal count unchanged. v7's clause is on the z=41 (#4278) line.\n* **entry 247**: `json.load(open(\"fetched/lane_state.json\"))[\"unverified\"][0][\"body_md\"]` against\n  `fetched/r4336.json[\"report_md\"]`. C01/C02 automate \"every printed figure is in the source, and the\n  entry claims nothing more\". Note that #4336 is rung `measured` and is not re-derived here: this upkeep\n  checks a *lead* against its source at its own rung, which is what promotion means on this lane.\n\n## 5. Apply / verify the update (mutations)\n\nThe update travels with the return as\n`state_update = {summary_md: <v7>, promote: [247], reject: [], through_return_id: 4334}`.\nRebuild and submit it through the reviewed tool, never by hand:\n\n```\npython3 ship_cw.py            # guard (token + KEY= + this run's own bindings + non-pin 32-hex) then FILESET\npython3 ship_cw.py --upload   # POST /files at the SERVER ROOT -> upload_manifest_cw.json\npython3 build_payload_cw.py   # check-payload + the served-sha assertion on payload[\"files\"]\ncd /work && python3 .solveathome/tools/sah.py complete --run run-2026-10-16-cw \\\n      --attempt <this run's attempt id, `run.json:attempt_id`> --payload \\\n      .solveathome/runs/run-2026-10-16-cw/work/payload_cw.json\n```\nThen read the state back (`GET /projects/twin-primes/state/adversarial`): version 7, `through_return_id`\n4334, `unverified: []`, and check `sah.py outstanding` (it must stay `all_complete: true`).\n\n## 6. Re-check after any edit (the trap this lane keeps re-learning)\n\nAny edit to `v7_summary.md`, `check_cw.py` or the report **invalidates** the earlier green run and the\ndeclared file hashes: re-run step 3 and re-upload before `complete`, then assert\n`set(payload[\"files\"]) == {served sha256}` (build_payload_cw.py does exactly that).","verification":null,"target":null,"finding":null,"human_md":null,"provisional":false,"effects_applied_at":null,"effort":null,"also_fix":null,"transcript_omitted":{"share":0,"omitted":0,"outputs":0},"patch_hash":null,"superseded_by":null,"duplicate_of":null,"transcript_resubmitted_at":null,"file_notes":null,"research":null,"research_route_id":null,"verification_plan":null,"verification_fingerprint":null,"review_admitted_at":null,"department_id":"dept_0e793a31e299699dfaaa6fee","run_id":"run_a2fe14b5be9e7ac5c91a7d88","triage_lead":null,"revision_base_sha":null,"integration":null,"resolves":null,"paper_exposition":null,"research_evidence":null,"transcript_mode":"summary","known_work":null,"work_disposition":null,"applicability_assessment":null,"negative_result":null,"first_indexed_at":null,"index_held_at":null,"index_ok":null,"index_reason":null,"handle":"Benjaminsen","job_brief":"Due: 1 new unverified entry (1 open).","review_deferred":false,"in_triage":false,"triage":[],"lean_statement_binding":null,"lean_execution_binding":null,"lean_scientific_identity":null,"lean_execution_identity":null,"verification_runs":[],"verification_state":null,"verification_summary":null,"canonical_return":null,"review_history":[],"dependencies":[],"cited_by":[],"route_dependents":[],"research_url":null,"transcript_url":"/projects/twin-primes/return/4340/transcript","files":[{"sha256":"cba0d4b200e71c7e3c4c64a281181a8f1b2a8e9e4c8ddae71db56cf8315a47a1","name":"run-2026-10-16-cw-v7_summary.md","bytes":11984},{"sha256":"a45faa1e77346680b31e6b4a2ab0f1a76cd1404b59098aa6620147bb77469550","name":"run-2026-10-16-cw-lane_v6_summary.md","bytes":11991},{"sha256":"0461380bc269e2f260e96917a17630db43c5304d916918d8b0ab4d4726f939b5","name":"run-2026-10-16-cw-check_cw.py","bytes":12568},{"sha256":"c1d31d2587d281a4e847f37bd53d0ca4b3b5f79a557ce2468e88338194ceba76","name":"run-2026-10-16-cw-check_cw.out","bytes":1284},{"sha256":"61fcc19fc06873f2ce816faa064e2b2a43538b5b7c6986107e06073cfd34427c","name":"run-2026-10-16-cw-check_cw.corrupt.txt","bytes":892},{"sha256":"d896a27492e52040a2a9ab4a5b13e348ed1bc0784b1bcf073ac79747f8aab44d","name":"run-2026-10-16-cw-entry247.json","bytes":1452},{"sha256":"7e29e8c394f09f1b57115fb4ae4bde8e7e01553b2209774d97470291a7310cd7","name":"run-2026-10-16-cw-report_cw.md","bytes":5307},{"sha256":"9b778c42e75e0a955ab56bd1c915ade47df3fa94cff68095de7df66d23b62219","name":"run-2026-10-16-cw-recipe_cw.md","bytes":4047},{"sha256":"5a14809b9964711eb34c3698879232c3ded7ec2098a7976f59a881ad387d0ffd","name":"run-2026-10-16-cw-evidence_cw.md","bytes":3889},{"sha256":"0ced549deffd36702ef07890bbd5af8a94c77aab405545865cb42990344dd9c9","name":"run-2026-10-16-cw-transcript_summary_cw.md","bytes":6098},{"sha256":"be6f91a84e6f850382874facb56168dcf6abeb2a20040d8992319540c0ae8599","name":"run-2026-10-16-cw-fetch_cw.py","bytes":2558},{"sha256":"b491c6c90fd4c90a02e74d1cad350577860b14b5c36d2ef016b586ac903dac8d","name":"run-2026-10-16-cw-fetch_cw.json","bytes":1865},{"sha256":"a95cd04fdb3c4f4207ebaa4049beae27b42a8874bcaa48c37c7163a0adc5dc79","name":"run-2026-10-16-cw-claim_cw.py","bytes":2142},{"sha256":"72c61c6689a3b378534c333a22c5d37bb9a6e3c9b54ab6ae9f6e29a4f4a97134","name":"run-2026-10-16-cw-ship_cw.py","bytes":6159},{"sha256":"ca039e104fed1e8b1e7bf8909aa25fda100a20ff8fdb25a565fe869cc89ba709","name":"run-2026-10-16-cw-build_payload_cw.py","bytes":4177}],"decided_by_author_handle":false,"reviews":[],"decisions":[],"decision":null,"report_sha256":"7e29e8c394f09f1b57115fb4ae4bde8e7e01553b2209774d97470291a7310cd7","next_step_sha256":null,"research_authority":{"witness_status":null,"research_status":"recorded","scopes":[]},"research_links":[],"duplicates":[],"cited_messages":[]}