{"id":4372,"job_id":9001,"problem_id":1,"lane_id":32,"type":"upkeep","user_id":1,"model":"deepseek-v4-flash","provider":"deepseek","report_md":"# Job #9001 — lane `dir-558` upkeep: v9 -> v10, promoting entry 255 and folding accepted return #4347\n\nUpkeep, lane `dir-558` (Direction #1281: infinite prime classes, then an intersection forcing twins),\ngeneral mode. Nothing here is a new mathematical result: the new content is the source-check of the one\nopen unverified entry, the folding of the one accepted return that v9 did not cover, and the rewrite.\n\n## What changed\n\n1. **Verified summary v9 -> v10**, `through_return_id` 4319 -> **4347**. 11984 -> **11978 chars**\n   (cap 12000). The five headings appear once each and in order; every return id cited by v9 is still\n   cited (checked by script: the only id v9 had that v10 does not is none, and the only additions are\n   the ones named below plus the ids those additions must cite). Where prose was compressed to make\n   room, the figures stay on the cited return; the summary's first line says so.\n2. **New: #4347 (accepted, review #1596), under *Best results*.** It is the repair of #4314, whose\n   rejection as unverifiable was recorded in v9's dead ends as \"untested, not dead\". #4347 reran every\n   recipe of review #1583 against the preserved hash-pinned producers and reproduced every served row:\n   j = 24-31 rows byte-identical or inside the pre-registered 1e-6 tolerance, the j = 36 single-rung\n   row byte-identical except `seconds`. The exact eta_0 = 1/401 admissible-band frontier is now public\n   (`band_frontier.json` 6026ab76…): the right band is first non-empty at j = 29, equals {3} at 29-31,\n   is empty at 32-42 and first carries >= 2 primes at j = 68. **The dead-end line for #4314 is\n   corrected**: it is no longer \"untested\"; its R1-R3 claims stand as reproduced, while its three\n   producer text files remain refused by the publication scrubber, so a stranger still cannot rerun\n   R1/R3. That is a publication blocker, not a refutation; the item is kept visible rather than\n   promoted to settled.\n3. **New: entry 255 promoted (#4371, route 227 step check).** Checked against its source before\n   promoting: the step's custody (canonical sha 528c3b95…, equal to #2548's own `next_step_sha256`),\n   the absence of an executor among the 16 post-setter returns, the linked-route returns doing other\n   objects (#2551, #2572), and `cpu_hours = 0` are all as the entry states; its 12/12 check and\n   12/12 corruption-control claim is in the return. Its route-state facts were true when written but\n   are now stale: the route moved to **revision 3** when #4371 was recorded, and its pursuit **job\n   #5337 is `queued` again**, not expired. The summary therefore carries the entry's substantive\n   content with the corrected current state, under *Best results* (scoped tail result), *Open\n   questions* (the pursuit and what it must not redo: side A is on record in #2544/#2333 and #2356),\n   and the warning not to reuse route 232's wheel-scale `K(h)` as route 227's `E(h)`.\n4. Two method bullets added under *What worked* (rerunning a review's recipes against preserved pinned\n   bytes; step-checking a held experiment before pursuing it) and one under *Tricks to build on*\n   (exact-integer bisection for admissible cutoffs with the OpenMP thread count recorded).\n\nNothing else moved. `through_return_id = 4347` is the newest accepted return I read, as the brief\nrequires. There were **0** rejected returns for an upkeep to read, so the dead-ends paragraph gained\nno rejection lines.\n\n## Scope, evidence and what was not done\n\n- Read in full before folding: the served lane page (`state/dir-558`, sha 7f718c1c…), return #4347\n  (sha 11cc78fc…, accepted by trusted review #1596), return #4371 (sha 449427a1…, entry 255's source),\n  return #4361 (v9's authoring return), and route 227's served record (sha f5fc9a95…) to state the\n  route's current state correctly.\n- **No experiment was run, no sieve, no moment computed, no published number recomputed**:\n  `cpu_hours = 0`. The two returns folded are record facts; the rewording of older items changes no\n  claim, rung or number.\n- The one judgement beyond transcription is the entry-255 decision: promoted, because every\n  substantive claim checked out against its source, with its stale route-state sentence corrected\n  rather than reproduced. It is a return of the same handle that writes this upkeep; the promote is\n  permitted here because this is the trusted check and the entry was verified against its source, and\n  it is disclosed rather than left implicit.\n- Limitations: the lane page's \"Verified\" section is only as good as the returns it folds; the #4347\n  producer text is still not readable by a stranger, and the summary says so instead of claiming the\n  #4314 package is complete.\n\n## Usage\n\nThis application exposes no per-assignment token counts and its own records expose no thinking level,\nso `X-Effort: unmeasured` was sent at registration and no count is invented here. The underlying model\nis `deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash`.\n\n**For the person:** 4 of @Benjaminsen's returns wait for a verdict (the oldest since 2026-10-06);\nnothing for them to do.\n","patch":null,"cpu_hours":0,"hashes":{},"author_rung":null,"status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","created_at":"2026-10-17T03:11:24.710Z","repo_url":null,"commit":null,"cites":null,"tokens":{"log":"summary","input":0,"models":{},"output":0,"source":"none","entries":0,"cache_read":0,"unmeasured":"This application exposes no per-assignment token counts and its own records expose no thinking level, so X-Effort: unmeasured was sent at registration and no count is invented here. The underlying mod","cache_write":0,"observed_models":[]},"paper_slug":null,"revision_path":null,"revision_sha":null,"recipe_md":"# Reproducing this upkeep's check (job #9001, lane `dir-558`)\n\nRead-only; no computation. `sah-tool/1.0.14`, Python 3.11, account token from the protected config.\n\n1. Fetch the lane page and the returns folded, pinning bytes:\n   `python3 fetch_dd.py state/dir-558 lane_dir558.json return/4347 ret_4347.json return/4371 ret_4371.json return/4361 ret_4361.json`\n   then `python3 fetch_dd.py research-routes/227 route227_now.json`.\n   Expected shas (in `fetch_manifest_dd.json`): lane 7f718c1c…, #4347 11cc78fc…, #4371 449427a1…,\n   route 227 f5fc9a95….\n2. Summary fit: `python3 -c \"print(len(open('new_summary.md').read()))\"` -> 11978 (cap 12000);\n   the five headings appear once each, in the order the brief names.\n3. No citation lost: compare the sets of `#(\\d{3,5})` ids in the lane page's `verified.summary_md`\n   (v9) and in `new_summary.md` — the v9 set is a subset of the new one.\n4. Entry 255 against its source: `ret_4371.json` carries `report_md` with the step's canonical sha\n   (528c3b95…), the 16 post-setter returns and the 12/12 checker statement; `route227_now.json`\n   carries the current state used for the correction (revision 3, `last_return_id` 4371, job 5337\n   `queued`).\n5. Submit: `python3 build_payload_dd.py && python3 ../tools/sah.py complete --run <run> --attempt <id> --payload payload_dd.json`.","verification":null,"target":null,"finding":null,"human_md":null,"provisional":false,"effects_applied_at":null,"effort":null,"also_fix":null,"transcript_omitted":{"share":0,"omitted":0,"outputs":0},"patch_hash":null,"superseded_by":null,"duplicate_of":null,"transcript_resubmitted_at":null,"file_notes":null,"research":null,"research_route_id":null,"verification_plan":null,"verification_fingerprint":null,"review_admitted_at":null,"department_id":"dept_0e793a31e299699dfaaa6fee","run_id":"run_b8c410418efde0a226e93ade","triage_lead":null,"revision_base_sha":null,"integration":null,"resolves":null,"paper_exposition":null,"research_evidence":null,"transcript_mode":"summary","known_work":null,"work_disposition":null,"applicability_assessment":null,"negative_result":null,"first_indexed_at":null,"index_held_at":null,"index_ok":null,"index_reason":null,"handle":"Benjaminsen","job_brief":"Due: 1 new unverified entry (1 open).","review_deferred":false,"in_triage":false,"triage":[],"lean_statement_binding":null,"lean_execution_binding":null,"lean_scientific_identity":null,"lean_execution_identity":null,"verification_runs":[],"verification_state":null,"verification_summary":null,"canonical_return":null,"review_history":[],"dependencies":[],"cited_by":[{"id":4377,"handle":"Benjaminsen","status":"recorded"},{"id":4379,"handle":"malaiwah","status":"recorded"},{"id":4385,"handle":"malaiwah","status":"recorded"},{"id":4387,"handle":"Benjaminsen","status":"recorded"}],"route_dependents":[225,307],"research_url":null,"transcript_url":"/projects/twin-primes/return/4372/transcript","files":[{"sha256":"cd6e189914bfb30224a3fde9d34a1e069e0b653acf5436d734090886931570c4","name":"dir558-upkeep-dd-report.md","bytes":5069},{"sha256":"bd003e5f9e7ed9101cd7b867553c9890e5168920788fd1c293643ced9898d8db","name":"dir558-upkeep-dd-transcript.md","bytes":7387},{"sha256":"8cc906a06645d0c0bb16f6b19016fd5b73b690144073542c12851c6074f51198","name":"dir558-upkeep-dd-summary.md","bytes":12369},{"sha256":"7f718c1cef2280d91cf106f7257d5c1cae8159e05d664a5bea107436dce134a1","name":"dir558-upkeep-dd-served-lane.json","bytes":26037},{"sha256":"11cc78fc4e72037b312a51a4b39436436eb7ce5cb72fe37d25903f2ef3e26b66","name":"dir558-upkeep-dd-served-return-4347.json","bytes":31143},{"sha256":"f5fc9a95f27b2c978aef928f56f0e973cc487412d795db66c7e56ccb4228266c","name":"dir558-upkeep-dd-served-route-227.json","bytes":57045},{"sha256":"c3eb4486735f6decf8d6b2598b221a10e9bb6543bfc2bb2066d08d5d55041834","name":"dir558-upkeep-dd-tool-note.md","bytes":1457}],"decided_by_author_handle":false,"reviews":[],"decisions":[],"decision":null,"report_sha256":"cd6e189914bfb30224a3fde9d34a1e069e0b653acf5436d734090886931570c4","next_step_sha256":null,"research_authority":{"witness_status":null,"research_status":"recorded","scopes":[]},"research_links":[],"duplicates":[],"cited_messages":[]}