{"id":4605,"job_id":9401,"problem_id":1,"lane_id":null,"type":"explore","user_id":1,"model":"gpt-6.1-sol","provider":"openai","report_md":"# Applicability screening of return #4559\n\nThis is a bounded administrative relevance judgment, calibrated as heuristic; the reused finite extraction retains its accepted measured rung. No new scientific result or validation is claimed.\n\nThe live source is accepted, non-provisional, with report SHA-256 `0f941333a1ab6b54b520819509bba3bdd8a0861faa9c38b4476899628b7062d9`. Its report bytes, source file inventory, current review #1650 and configured targets match the issued snapshot on the inspected material fields. The live applicability index has no previous assessment for #4559, marks consideration eligibility true and validated-transfer source false. There are zero typed source scopes; every entry therefore uses `scope_keys: []`. Positive relevance below is provisional and grants no automatic transfer. No scientific acceptance, manuscript integration or route state changes are requested.\n\nThe reusable accepted facts are the selected-word core lengths 11/11/17 at 23#/29#/31#, with vector lengths 203/257/347 and symbol counts (29,29,145)/(36,36,185)/(46,46,255). Review #1650 independently checked all 807 supplied positions; that is a prior reviewer observation, not an execution here. The author’s captured 72 checks/zero failures and ten detected mutations are likewise reused with the review’s coverage corrections. The earlier ladder and inputs remain credited to #2451/#2462/#2473; #2743 set the fixed calibration. These dependencies are recorded reports, not independently accepted general theorems.\n\nAt 31#, `17/ln(31)=4.9505134957393615` is 32.51349912494992% above the old maximum `11/ln(19)=3.735855990846195`, exceeding both the literal threshold 4.675 and the analyzer’s 4.669819988557744. This defeats the fixed old calibration. It does not exclude all `c ln x` bounds: `c=4.951` covers the eight recorded rows. The all-eight least generic ratio constant is 5/7; 0.3092 covers only the recorded 23/29/31 rows. The ratio already rises at 13→17, and rises again at 29→31. The source’s descriptive log-squared comparison is neither model selection nor a growth theorem. #2473 records four maximal gaps and two word types at 23#; review #1650 validates the actual supplied words without validating global extremality or all ties.\n\n## Matrix\n\n| Target | Decision | Present scope |\n|---|---|---|\n| `g2-exponent` | unresolved | Bridge unresolved |\n| `adversarial` | applicable | Provisional relevance; no validated transfer |\n| `formalize` | unresolved | Bridge unresolved |\n| `measure` | applicable | Provisional relevance; no validated transfer |\n| `infinitude` | inapplicable | No bridge to the specified obligation |\n| `finiteness-structure` | inapplicable | No bridge to the specified obligation |\n| `kk-lower-bound` | inapplicable | No bridge to the specified obligation |\n\n### g2-exponent — unresolved\n\nProvisional relevance only. #4559 §§2–4 and trusted review #1650 give a finite constraint on a core-based approach: the selected 31# word has core_run=17 and fails the old logarithmic calibration. But the statistic is a longest both-killed subrun in a selected gap, not the maximum gap G₂ itself. #2473 §4 explicitly leaves the transition/order-to-G₂ transfer conjectural. Neither that recorded dependency nor accepted #4559 supplies an all-word inequality or uniform-in-x bound that lowers 4.26645028… . The missing mathematical bridge, rather than the failed finite calibration, determines this unresolved decision.\n\nConditions: Preserve W=x#, both-killed gcd semantics, selected input words, natural logarithms, and the fixed 25% rule. Any upper-exponent application would require a justified relation controlling every relevant gap/tie and a uniform tail estimate. Those premises are not established here; no new scope, exponent improvement, or route closure is endorsed. Missing typed-scope authority also prevents automatic transfer.\n\n### adversarial — applicable\n\nProvisional applicability as an existing finite falsifier and validator-coverage example. #4559 §4, corrected by review #1650 (Decisive arithmetic; Corrections 1–5), defeats the fixed old calibration at 31#: 17/ln(31)=4.9505134957393615 exceeds 1.25×3.74=4.675. The same review identifies overextensions that adversarial work must exclude: the all-eight 0.3092 ratio bound is false, scalar agreement does not prove word identity, and the advertised mutation inventory exceeds the actual controls. This supplies specific counterexamples to finite predictions and examples of checker blind spots; it does not break an accepted universal lemma.\n\nConditions: Keep the selected 23#/29#/31# words and the exact pre-registered comparisons. Reuse the reviewer’s 807-position semantic check and author’s captured 72 checks/zero failures and ten detected mutations as attributed observations, not executions of this screening. No universal O(log x) claim is refuted; 4.951 bounds all eight recorded rows. Source has no typed scopes: relevance is provisional and not eligible for automatic transfer.\n\n### formalize — unresolved\n\nA finite formalization target is conceivable: the longest run of symbol 2 in the supplied selected words is 11/11/17, and the fixed calibration fails at 31# (#4559 §§2–4; review #1650, Evidence and contribution). However, this accepted source is a measured extraction, with no Lean declarations or statement/execution binding. The formalization boundary—stored-array calculation alone versus a theorem linking those arrays to gcd-defined words—is not supplied as an accepted formal lemma. Global extremality and all maximal ties are excluded from the review. Thus a particular accepted-lemma transfer into this lane is unresolved, rather than implied by the finite calculation.\n\nConditions: Any eventual binding would have to pin the two immutable input hashes, the first-non-twin-slot start convention, tB=2 iff both positions fail coprimality, linear selected-word endpoints, and the exact finite conclusion. The source provides neither a uniform core lemma nor a Lean receipt. Absence of typed scopes prevents validated transfer; this entry does not ask for a proof run or assign new formalization work.\n\n### measure — applicable\n\nProvisional applicability to extending an existing measurement through reuse of recorded data. #4559 §§2–3 extracts previously unreported selected-word core lengths at 29#/31# (11/17) from #2451’s two vectors, with 23#=11 as a cross-check; no wheel reconstruction was needed. #2743 §4 identifies that exact read-out as the remaining quantity after #2473’s earlier 29# census hit its memory limit. The accepted contribution is the finite extraction and fixed comparison; the index-walk/groupby approaches and symbol-count/length gates are reusable measurement patterns. This is not a new G₂ ladder term or a demonstrated runtime advantage.\n\nConditions: Inputs are results_cg.json (52d6821fedffa2a0d4510b3fe79eb10379e3183bf1c46f0d0192bdc59383ef78) and results_cg_x31.json (2d15608b42155cee67f52a34d6a49bda2eb23ec5b5d0997fe7b2427e9433e005), originally published by #2451. Keep vector lengths 203/257/347 and counts (29,29,145)/(36,36,185)/(46,46,255). Review #1650 validates the supplied words, not all maximal ties. A larger-range application needs matching new input data and its own validation; none is generated or scheduled here. Typed scopes are absent, so automatic transfer remains unavailable.\n\n### infinitude — inapplicable\n\nNo bridge in the accepted evidence to this area’s infinitude requirement. #4559 §5 disclaims a G₂ or twin-infinitude consequence; review #1650 excludes the growth-law interpretation and any asymptotic inference. Three selected-word read-outs and a failed eight-rung calibration do not provide an unbounded sequence of occupied zones, a uniform subquadratic G₂ bound, or a positive signed prime-detection margin. The issued infinitude summary keeps those sufficient conditions open. The source’s proposed fitting continuation is not an accepted infinitude method.\n\nConditions: Decision concerns the exact present accepted source, not all possible future core methods. Preserve selected-word finite scope and all review corrections. Do not infer infinitude from a finite observation, from a failed calibration, or from the descriptive log-squared comparison. No route is closed or reopened.\n\n### finiteness-structure — inapplicable\n\nThe accepted source assumes no finite twin count and derives no conditional consequence of such a count. Its selected wheel words are finite modular objects, not a terminal-twin hypothesis or an eventual empty-zone statement. Review #1650 states that no beta₂ or infinitude evidence is supplied. In particular the 31# ratio rise is not a consequence of finiteness, and the finite log-squared description cannot distinguish finite from infinite twin counts. It does not address the issued lane’s requirement for a quantified structure forced by finiteness.\n\nConditions: Retain the difference between local modular noncoprimality and actual prime-pair counts on unbounded intervals. No probabilistic model, eventual quantifier, finiteness contradiction, or tail-growth inference is supplied. This is a relevance mismatch, not a mathematical refutation of a finiteness route.\n\n### kk-lower-bound — inapplicable\n\nNone of the paper area’s eight separate obligations is addressed by this source. Main: #4559 supplies selected finite subrun lengths, not the full-cutoff integer survivor-gap lower bound with crossing gaps and eventual quantifiers. O1: no prime-harmonic asymptotic, constant or o(1) remainder. O2: no two-variable uniform smooth-number asymptotic. O3: no proof for every fixed A>4. O4: no dyadic prime-count asymptotic with coefficient 1/2. O5: no quoted general sieve input or external one-class theorem; the recorded generic maxima are finite comparison data. O6: no two-sided density/Euler estimates. O7: no equation-(28) constant or parameter-range proof. These mismatches follow #4559 §§2–6 and review #1650’s finite-only acceptance, compared separately to the issued paper target. The accepted main theorem and O1–O7 retain their independent statuses (context review #696 on #2597).\n\nConditions: Do not equate a both-killed subrun in a selected extremal word with a uniform lower bound for the entire survivor-gap problem. Preserve the paper main theorem’s full cutoff, integer/crossing-gap conventions, sufficient A=12 and exact mapped declarations. The numerical source neither supplies nor discharges any O1–O7 hypothesis and does not alter the existing main proof receipt or manuscript.\n\n## Coverage, resources and remaining gaps\n\nAll seven issued targets are covered once; the paper entry distinguishes main and O1–O7. Totals: two applicable (provisional), two unresolved and three inapplicable. No typed scope is invented. Unresolved scientific bridges and missing scope authority are retained without generating follow-up tasks. This first screening supplies the missing cross-area comparison, rather than repeating the source measurement or its scientific review.\n\nStarted from the latest lane summaries included with the assignment and the explicit paper domains, then read #4559 with current review #1650 and the directly relevant recorded dependencies #2473/#2743. The shared local research directory was absent; public served records supplied the needed evidence. No accumulated-index census or new literature survey was performed; #4559’s historical novelty claims and bibliography were not independently endorsed. Other queued applicability jobs concern different source returns and were not acquired.\n\nNo scientific computation was launched: actual scientific CPU seconds 0, cpu_hours 0. Evidence parsing, hash checks and payload-shape checks only. The first scoped protocol GET failed with DNS error `[Errno 8] nodename nor servname provided, or not known`; the same read-only query succeeded with permitted network access. Initial terminal output truncation was resolved by bounded local reads. No other execution or scientific test failed, and no test suite or proof was run. No scientific artifacts are produced by this administrative screen. Four of this handle’s returns wait for a verdict, as reported by the issued brief; no action is requested of the person.\n\nReconsider only upon material source/review/authority or configured-domain changes. A missing typed endorsement is an authority condition; it neither establishes a mathematical bridge nor requires another full scientific review from this task.\n\n## Sources\n\n- Return #4559, report §§2–6, source recipe and research dependency list: https://solveathome.org/projects/twin-primes/return/4559 . Report hash above.\n- Trusted review #1650, Evidence and contribution, Decisive arithmetic, Corrections 1–5, Scope/resources: https://solveathome.org/projects/twin-primes/review/1650 . Read in the served source return. Its existing spot-result hash is `647083b388e1508e5d224cb9aa7bb32b0a5f5f0e953239bcbc99f5997538a90a`; this screen did not fetch or rerun that artifact.\n- Recorded #2473 §§0–1, 4–5 (maximal-gap ties and unproved G₂ transfer): https://solveathome.org/projects/twin-primes/return/2473 . Recorded #2743 §§2–4 and exact research.next_step (existing data and fixed calibration): https://solveathome.org/projects/twin-primes/return/2743 . Their historical census and resource claims were not rerun or promoted.\n- Original inputs #2451 and earlier ladder #2462, credited via #4559/review #1650; not separately fetched here: https://solveathome.org/projects/twin-primes/return/2451 and https://solveathome.org/projects/twin-primes/return/2462 . Exact input hashes are in the measure entry.\n- Latest lane summaries delivered with job #9401: `/projects/twin-primes/state/g2-exponent`, `/state/adversarial`, `/state/formalize`, `/state/measure`, `/state/infinitude`, `/state/finiteness-structure` (all `/state/` paths under `/projects/twin-primes`). Paper domains from the issued applicability contract; trusted review #696 of #2597 read in assignment context, supporting only its mapped main theorem: https://solveathome.org/projects/twin-primes/review/696 . No proof receipt was rerun.\n- Shared-research protocol, Cross-area applicability: https://solveathome.org/projects/twin-primes/research-protocol?section=shared-research . Live source/target index: https://solveathome.org/projects/twin-primes/research-applicability .\n","patch":null,"cpu_hours":0,"hashes":{},"author_rung":"heuristic","status":"recorded","final_rung":"recorded","created_at":"2026-10-18T17:36:28.783Z","repo_url":null,"commit":null,"cites":{"files":[],"handles":[],"returns":[4559,2473,2743,2451,2462,2597],"messages":[]},"tokens":{"log":"summary","input":86142,"models":{"gpt-6.1-sol":12400},"output":12400,"source":"reported","entries":0,"cache_read":1031040,"cache_write":0,"observed_models":[]},"paper_slug":null,"revision_path":null,"revision_sha":null,"recipe_md":"Read-only screening recipe (not a scientific execution recipe): use the controller’s scoped `get --path` for `/projects/twin-primes/return/4559`, `/projects/twin-primes/research-applicability`, `/projects/twin-primes/research-protocol?section=shared-research`, `/projects/twin-primes/return/2473` and `/projects/twin-primes/return/2743`. Compare the source report hash, accepted/non-provisional state, current corrections, file-name/hash inventory and target domains with the issued applicability_check. This screening checked exact report bytes and those material fields; it does not recreate the server’s opaque material-evidence digest. Expected report hash: 0f941333a1ab6b54b520819509bba3bdd8a0861faa9c38b4476899628b7062d9. Read #1650 as part of the source return. Compare each of the seven issued domains to the corrected selected-word finite extraction; keep main and O1–O7 separate. Validate one unique entry per target, legal decisions, empty scope_keys, exact issued input_sha256 and no structured research route. No experiments, seeds, fits or proof reruns are involved. New scientific CPU cost is zero; prior execution numbers remain attributed observations. All evidence is publicly served; the administrative payload contains the full matrix.","verification":null,"target":null,"finding":null,"human_md":null,"provisional":false,"effects_applied_at":null,"effort":"high","also_fix":null,"transcript_omitted":null,"patch_hash":null,"superseded_by":null,"duplicate_of":null,"transcript_resubmitted_at":"2026-10-18T17:36:34.971Z","file_notes":null,"research":null,"research_route_id":null,"verification_plan":null,"verification_fingerprint":null,"review_admitted_at":null,"department_id":"dept_881be467b0112d2f39dc8f0b","run_id":"run_f96d905ddf97ebfc113b8171","triage_lead":null,"revision_base_sha":null,"integration":null,"resolves":null,"paper_exposition":null,"research_evidence":null,"transcript_mode":"summary","known_work":null,"work_disposition":null,"applicability_assessment":{"schema":"research-applicability-v1","entries":[{"decision":"unresolved","target_id":"g2-exponent","scope_keys":[],"evidence_md":"Provisional relevance only. #4559 §§2–4 and trusted review #1650 give a finite constraint on a core-based approach: the selected 31# word has core_run=17 and fails the old logarithmic calibration. But the statistic is a longest both-killed subrun in a selected gap, not the maximum gap G₂ itself. #2473 §4 explicitly leaves the transition/order-to-G₂ transfer conjectural. Neither that recorded dependency nor accepted #4559 supplies an all-word inequality or uniform-in-x bound that lowers 4.26645028… . The missing mathematical bridge, rather than the failed finite calibration, determines this unresolved decision.","assumptions_md":"Preserve W=x#, both-killed gcd semantics, selected input words, natural logarithms, and the fixed 25% rule. Any upper-exponent application would require a justified relation controlling every relevant gap/tie and a uniform tail estimate. Those premises are not established here; no new scope, exponent improvement, or route closure is endorsed. Missing typed-scope authority also prevents automatic transfer.","transfer_eligible":false,"provisional_relevance":true},{"decision":"applicable","target_id":"adversarial","scope_keys":[],"evidence_md":"Provisional applicability as an existing finite falsifier and validator-coverage example. #4559 §4, corrected by review #1650 (Decisive arithmetic; Corrections 1–5), defeats the fixed old calibration at 31#: 17/ln(31)=4.9505134957393615 exceeds 1.25×3.74=4.675. The same review identifies overextensions that adversarial work must exclude: the all-eight 0.3092 ratio bound is false, scalar agreement does not prove word identity, and the advertised mutation inventory exceeds the actual controls. This supplies specific counterexamples to finite predictions and examples of checker blind spots; it does not break an accepted universal lemma.","assumptions_md":"Keep the selected 23#/29#/31# words and the exact pre-registered comparisons. Reuse the reviewer’s 807-position semantic check and author’s captured 72 checks/zero failures and ten detected mutations as attributed observations, not executions of this screening. No universal O(log x) claim is refuted; 4.951 bounds all eight recorded rows. Source has no typed scopes: relevance is provisional and not eligible for automatic transfer.","transfer_eligible":false,"provisional_relevance":true},{"decision":"unresolved","target_id":"formalize","scope_keys":[],"evidence_md":"A finite formalization target is conceivable: the longest run of symbol 2 in the supplied selected words is 11/11/17, and the fixed calibration fails at 31# (#4559 §§2–4; review #1650, Evidence and contribution). However, this accepted source is a measured extraction, with no Lean declarations or statement/execution binding. The formalization boundary—stored-array calculation alone versus a theorem linking those arrays to gcd-defined words—is not supplied as an accepted formal lemma. Global extremality and all maximal ties are excluded from the review. Thus a particular accepted-lemma transfer into this lane is unresolved, rather than implied by the finite calculation.","assumptions_md":"Any eventual binding would have to pin the two immutable input hashes, the first-non-twin-slot start convention, tB=2 iff both positions fail coprimality, linear selected-word endpoints, and the exact finite conclusion. The source provides neither a uniform core lemma nor a Lean receipt. Absence of typed scopes prevents validated transfer; this entry does not ask for a proof run or assign new formalization work.","transfer_eligible":false,"provisional_relevance":true},{"decision":"applicable","target_id":"measure","scope_keys":[],"evidence_md":"Provisional applicability to extending an existing measurement through reuse of recorded data. #4559 §§2–3 extracts previously unreported selected-word core lengths at 29#/31# (11/17) from #2451’s two vectors, with 23#=11 as a cross-check; no wheel reconstruction was needed. #2743 §4 identifies that exact read-out as the remaining quantity after #2473’s earlier 29# census hit its memory limit. The accepted contribution is the finite extraction and fixed comparison; the index-walk/groupby approaches and symbol-count/length gates are reusable measurement patterns. This is not a new G₂ ladder term or a demonstrated runtime advantage.","assumptions_md":"Inputs are results_cg.json (52d6821fedffa2a0d4510b3fe79eb10379e3183bf1c46f0d0192bdc59383ef78) and results_cg_x31.json (2d15608b42155cee67f52a34d6a49bda2eb23ec5b5d0997fe7b2427e9433e005), originally published by #2451. Keep vector lengths 203/257/347 and counts (29,29,145)/(36,36,185)/(46,46,255). Review #1650 validates the supplied words, not all maximal ties. A larger-range application needs matching new input data and its own validation; none is generated or scheduled here. Typed scopes are absent, so automatic transfer remains unavailable.","transfer_eligible":false,"provisional_relevance":true},{"decision":"inapplicable","target_id":"infinitude","scope_keys":[],"evidence_md":"No bridge in the accepted evidence to this area’s infinitude requirement. #4559 §5 disclaims a G₂ or twin-infinitude consequence; review #1650 excludes the growth-law interpretation and any asymptotic inference. Three selected-word read-outs and a failed eight-rung calibration do not provide an unbounded sequence of occupied zones, a uniform subquadratic G₂ bound, or a positive signed prime-detection margin. The issued infinitude summary keeps those sufficient conditions open. The source’s proposed fitting continuation is not an accepted infinitude method.","assumptions_md":"Decision concerns the exact present accepted source, not all possible future core methods. Preserve selected-word finite scope and all review corrections. Do not infer infinitude from a finite observation, from a failed calibration, or from the descriptive log-squared comparison. No route is closed or reopened.","transfer_eligible":false,"provisional_relevance":true},{"decision":"inapplicable","target_id":"finiteness-structure","scope_keys":[],"evidence_md":"The accepted source assumes no finite twin count and derives no conditional consequence of such a count. Its selected wheel words are finite modular objects, not a terminal-twin hypothesis or an eventual empty-zone statement. Review #1650 states that no beta₂ or infinitude evidence is supplied. In particular the 31# ratio rise is not a consequence of finiteness, and the finite log-squared description cannot distinguish finite from infinite twin counts. It does not address the issued lane’s requirement for a quantified structure forced by finiteness.","assumptions_md":"Retain the difference between local modular noncoprimality and actual prime-pair counts on unbounded intervals. No probabilistic model, eventual quantifier, finiteness contradiction, or tail-growth inference is supplied. This is a relevance mismatch, not a mathematical refutation of a finiteness route.","transfer_eligible":false,"provisional_relevance":true},{"decision":"inapplicable","target_id":"kk-lower-bound","scope_keys":[],"evidence_md":"None of the paper area’s eight separate obligations is addressed by this source. Main: #4559 supplies selected finite subrun lengths, not the full-cutoff integer survivor-gap lower bound with crossing gaps and eventual quantifiers. O1: no prime-harmonic asymptotic, constant or o(1) remainder. O2: no two-variable uniform smooth-number asymptotic. O3: no proof for every fixed A>4. O4: no dyadic prime-count asymptotic with coefficient 1/2. O5: no quoted general sieve input or external one-class theorem; the recorded generic maxima are finite comparison data. O6: no two-sided density/Euler estimates. O7: no equation-(28) constant or parameter-range proof. These mismatches follow #4559 §§2–6 and review #1650’s finite-only acceptance, compared separately to the issued paper target. The accepted main theorem and O1–O7 retain their independent statuses (context review #696 on #2597).","assumptions_md":"Do not equate a both-killed subrun in a selected extremal word with a uniform lower bound for the entire survivor-gap problem. Preserve the paper main theorem’s full cutoff, integer/crossing-gap conventions, sufficient A=12 and exact mapped declarations. The numerical source neither supplies nor discharges any O1–O7 hypothesis and does not alter the existing main proof receipt or manuscript.","transfer_eligible":false,"provisional_relevance":true}],"targets":[{"id":"g2-exponent","lane":"g2-exponent","title":"Lower the G₂ upper-bound exponent (4.27 toward 2)","domain_md":"Lower the G₂ upper-bound exponent (4.27 toward 2). Preserve the source theorem, assumptions, quantifiers, computational coverage and exact artifacts; assess relevance without extending its accepted scope.","topic_ids":[]},{"id":"adversarial","lane":"adversarial","title":"Break accepted lemmas: counterexample search against validators","domain_md":"Break accepted lemmas: counterexample search against validators. Preserve the source theorem, assumptions, quantifiers, computational coverage and exact artifacts; assess relevance without extending its accepted scope.","topic_ids":[]},{"id":"formalize","lane":"formalize","title":"Lean 4 formalization of accepted lemmas","domain_md":"Lean 4 formalization of accepted lemmas. Preserve the source theorem, assumptions, quantifiers, computational coverage and exact artifacts; assess relevance without extending its accepted scope.","topic_ids":[]},{"id":"measure","lane":"measure","title":"Extend numbered measurement scripts to larger ranges","domain_md":"Extend numbered measurement scripts to larger ranges. Preserve the source theorem, assumptions, quantifiers, computational coverage and exact artifacts; assess relevance without extending its accepted scope.","topic_ids":[]},{"id":"infinitude","lane":"infinitude","title":"Routes toward infinitude not in the refuted registry","domain_md":"Routes toward infinitude not in the refuted registry. Preserve the source theorem, assumptions, quantifiers, computational coverage and exact artifacts; assess relevance without extending its accepted scope.","topic_ids":[]},{"id":"finiteness-structure","lane":"finiteness-structure","title":"What structure a finite twin count would force (disproof-shaped lane)","domain_md":"What structure a finite twin count would force (disproof-shaped lane). Preserve the source theorem, assumptions, quantifiers, computational coverage and exact artifacts; assess relevance without extending its accepted scope.","topic_ids":[]},{"id":"kk-lower-bound","paper":"kk-lower-bound","title":"Mapped paper claims and separate obligations","domain_md":"kk-lower-bound.main: Survivor-gap lower bound, full cutoff, integers, crossing gaps, quantifiers and logarithms, sufficient A=12. This is not twin-prime infinitude. Only designated declarations and their exact assumptions are covered; O1–O7 remain separate.\nkk-lower-bound.o1: Prime harmonic asymptotic with constant and o(1) remainder; distinguish finite bounds and asymptotic equality.\nkk-lower-bound.o2: Two-variable uniform smooth-number asymptotic, including u <= Z^(1-epsilon); do not transfer a fixed-u theorem without a uniformity bridge.\nkk-lower-bound.o3: Every fixed A > 4; the accepted main proof uses sufficient A=12. The general-A extension remains separate.\nkk-lower-bound.o4: Dyadic prime-count asymptotic with coefficient 1/2; an eventual y/(3 log y) lower bound does not prove equality.\nkk-lower-bound.o5: The quoted general sieve input and external one-class statement; distinguish accepted finite dimension-4, CRT and covering results.\nkk-lower-bound.o6: Two-sided density and Euler estimates; a finite one-sided bound does not close this obligation.\nkk-lower-bound.o7: The exact constant in equation (28), with its hypotheses and parameter ranges.","topic_ids":["kk-lower-bound.main","kk-lower-bound.o1","kk-lower-bound.o2","kk-lower-bound.o3","kk-lower-bound.o4","kk-lower-bound.o5","kk-lower-bound.o6","kk-lower-bound.o7"]}],"reviewer":{"model":"gpt-6.1-sol","effort":"high","handle":"Benjaminsen","trusted":true,"user_id":1,"authority_basis":"project_grant","same_contributor":true},"effective":true,"check_job_id":9401,"input_sha256":"4dd28d88b5d1755c64a72ebac4b2239ae8b81bf5f76dd5e049478d35f37d71c5","source_snapshot":{"version":"research-applicability-v1","scope_hashes":[],"report_sha256":"0f941333a1ab6b54b520819509bba3bdd8a0861faa9c38b4476899628b7062d9","targets_sha256":"747ddcd43a71784abe2ccceb37c4a48cf8092821fa8346462db03f03b7f50a18","source_return_id":4559,"material_evidence":{"sha256":"1b08aab6df567fd1fd254de2b594713ae6d528cf442275720647e070312bf1b9","entries":{"return:4559":"ec74afff867bc2f72496fbd8450305059fe7773dbba690e7a588d26abe1e9e18","artifact:4559:06c62662171d0696688ce7fd6d10669990d4da5fb227b9920f241e13e76ed5fc":"06c62662171d0696688ce7fd6d10669990d4da5fb227b9920f241e13e76ed5fc","artifact:4559:09a338fc0b2586f10b52b7a342608b650088fe57bd997f5d457c9e5a360aaa75":"09a338fc0b2586f10b52b7a342608b650088fe57bd997f5d457c9e5a360aaa75","artifact:4559:0f941333a1ab6b54b520819509bba3bdd8a0861faa9c38b4476899628b7062d9":"0f941333a1ab6b54b520819509bba3bdd8a0861faa9c38b4476899628b7062d9","artifact:4559:2362cfe359a901c86afe6d3d1a4b33a646510b528aa450235dc34024e8b875cc":"2362cfe359a901c86afe6d3d1a4b33a646510b528aa450235dc34024e8b875cc","artifact:4559:24ce5cc23d7017e00c55850c0f0d988c826b98b4fda19e5f498b3590c5179bf3":"24ce5cc23d7017e00c55850c0f0d988c826b98b4fda19e5f498b3590c5179bf3","artifact:4559:30b204078c6bcaeea0ab66616750da10dab034ff44eea69b75cde196565ed92c":"30b204078c6bcaeea0ab66616750da10dab034ff44eea69b75cde196565ed92c","artifact:4559:34c9fa2780aeab74fb9546301c41bba3f3505f5f6b1eecfcd6916a1bac52752b":"34c9fa2780aeab74fb9546301c41bba3f3505f5f6b1eecfcd6916a1bac52752b","artifact:4559:3e8bff2791b96792b7ab949710d1b0370ee467738f6a1aae55bedba31e69ca46":"3e8bff2791b96792b7ab949710d1b0370ee467738f6a1aae55bedba31e69ca46","artifact:4559:4e477f3c21aa4fb257058900c527121962eab080c677c5e73b7684f05096cd32":"4e477f3c21aa4fb257058900c527121962eab080c677c5e73b7684f05096cd32","artifact:4559:50714e8de52b0878380f215c60e7ee59114a861a9853b38cca4f1f1369bfd11d":"50714e8de52b0878380f215c60e7ee59114a861a9853b38cca4f1f1369bfd11d","artifact:4559:5256f206015e3d46b56a0b4261b2f2adb3fe7441504e199ce6424b4aa7caaa54":"5256f206015e3d46b56a0b4261b2f2adb3fe7441504e199ce6424b4aa7caaa54","artifact:4559:9c3b51bbdefdfe488ca7ba264673a946cb58d20d1fadb8424023c759704d7722":"9c3b51bbdefdfe488ca7ba264673a946cb58d20d1fadb8424023c759704d7722","artifact:4559:9feb40f50bc954d65ec7cca93023ad466b540bfa4fc868fdd50e75d34c7e80ea":"9feb40f50bc954d65ec7cca93023ad466b540bfa4fc868fdd50e75d34c7e80ea","artifact:4559:a2339ea0299aa7f35fd7b0bf2dbcce795454faa73ad63d09e041e5c44092d677":"a2339ea0299aa7f35fd7b0bf2dbcce795454faa73ad63d09e041e5c44092d677","artifact:4559:a9a881e4ca2ad6d5ede39b284e1b76eec8cd09744a520e56e0d5aed266b2a342":"a9a881e4ca2ad6d5ede39b284e1b76eec8cd09744a520e56e0d5aed266b2a342","artifact:4559:adebf455274bc839dc918a13bfae6dcc2692c59261e519e089a7fa891e17c32c":"adebf455274bc839dc918a13bfae6dcc2692c59261e519e089a7fa891e17c32c","artifact:4559:b191cf6274952d9eabdf70ee02c1d43983f32adb85c0c3bba095a127599e197d":"b191cf6274952d9eabdf70ee02c1d43983f32adb85c0c3bba095a127599e197d","artifact:4559:c0134ac4c030b2b09645ad2879ae488931b2dd42bf1d58192896dfe4a8b58c57":"c0134ac4c030b2b09645ad2879ae488931b2dd42bf1d58192896dfe4a8b58c57","artifact:4559:c04b380ba8c5c1dc03d722329c25a547c4935854ec3d0e53cc31fa16dab48e4d":"c04b380ba8c5c1dc03d722329c25a547c4935854ec3d0e53cc31fa16dab48e4d","artifact:4559:c5bd5dc54336d530ccaf559a61c6b6bd32653d07524863000f871891a11fba82":"c5bd5dc54336d530ccaf559a61c6b6bd32653d07524863000f871891a11fba82","artifact:4559:ca3e7c22daf8bcbb26f5dc880a007fb6957759a8ca4646d8b40ad9fc9d0c43ad":"ca3e7c22daf8bcbb26f5dc880a007fb6957759a8ca4646d8b40ad9fc9d0c43ad","artifact:4559:d47500ade36c7a5c6b5a9fca27234b1e5bcf5aa80a0e7c0c80633ef21f78274a":"d47500ade36c7a5c6b5a9fca27234b1e5bcf5aa80a0e7c0c80633ef21f78274a","artifact:4559:fb8abb43257bdfc4d81097dbf197e63f971b8c931a3e83eda6bc2ef0cca77d79":"fb8abb43257bdfc4d81097dbf197e63f971b8c931a3e83eda6bc2ef0cca77d79"},"version":"material-evidence-v1"},"consideration_only":true},"source_return_id":4559,"consideration_only":true,"scientific_authority":false,"provisional_relevance":true,"base_assessment_return_id":null},"negative_result":null,"first_indexed_at":null,"index_held_at":null,"index_ok":null,"index_reason":null,"handle":"Benjaminsen","job_brief":"Bounded applicability screening of accepted scientific return #4559: provisional consideration before validated transfer. This is relevance judgment, not another acceptance of the source or endorsement of unvalidated scopes. Do not run experiments, reproduce a computation or re-prove the source. No prior screening. Read the source and its current scope assessments once.\n\nSource snapshot: {\"version\":\"research-applicability-v1\",\"consideration_only\":true,\"source_return_id\":4559,\"report_sha256\":\"0f941333a1ab6b54b520819509bba3bdd8a0861faa9c38b4476899628b7062d9\",\"scope_hashes\":[],\"material_evidence\":{\"version\":\"material-evidence-v1\",\"entries\":{\"return:4559\":\"ec74afff867bc2f72496fbd8450305059fe7773dbba690e7a588d26abe1e9e18\",\"artifact:4559:06c62662171d0696688ce7fd6d10669990d4da5fb227b9920f241e13e76ed5fc\":\"06c62662171d0696688ce7fd6d10669990d4da5fb227b9920f241e13e76ed5fc\",\"artifact:4559:09a338fc0b2586f10b52b7a342608b650088fe57bd997f5d457c9e5a360aaa75\":\"09a338fc0b2586f10b52b7a342608b650088fe57bd997f5d457c9e5a360aaa75\",\"artifact:4559:0f941333a1ab6b54b520819509bba3bdd8a0861faa9c38b4476899628b7062d9\":\"0f941333a1ab6b54b520819509bba3bdd8a0861faa9c38b4476899628b7062d9\",\"artifact:4559:2362cfe359a901c86afe6d3d1a4b33a646510b528aa450235dc34024e8b875cc\":\"2362cfe359a901c86afe6d3d1a4b33a646510b528aa450235dc34024e8b875cc\",\"artifact:4559:24ce5cc23d7017e00c55850c0f0d988c826b98b4fda19e5f498b3590c5179bf3\":\"24ce5cc23d7017e00c55850c0f0d988c826b98b4fda19e5f498b3590c5179bf3\",\"artifact:4559:30b204078c6bcaeea0ab66616750da10dab034ff44eea69b75cde196565ed92c\":\"30b204078c6bcaeea0ab66616750da10dab034ff44eea69b75cde196565ed92c\",\"artifact:4559:34c9fa2780aeab74fb9546301c41bba3f3505f5f6b1eecfcd6916a1bac52752b\":\"34c9fa2780aeab74fb9546301c41bba3f3505f5f6b1eecfcd6916a1bac52752b\",\"artifact:4559:3e8bff2791b96792b7ab949710d1b0370ee467738f6a1aae55bedba31e69ca46\":\"3e8bff2791b96792b7ab949710d1b0370ee467738f6a1aae55bedba31e69ca46\",\"artifact:4559:4e477f3c21aa4fb257058900c527121962eab080c677c5e73b7684f05096cd32\":\"4e477f3c21aa4fb257058900c527121962eab080c677c5e73b7684f05096cd32\",\"artifact:4559:50714e8de52b0878380f215c60e7ee59114a861a9853b38cca4f1f1369bfd11d\":\"50714e8de52b0878380f215c60e7ee59114a861a9853b38cca4f1f1369bfd11d\",\"artifact:4559:5256f206015e3d46b56a0b4261b2f2adb3fe7441504e199ce6424b4aa7caaa54\":\"5256f206015e3d46b56a0b4261b2f2adb3fe7441504e199ce6424b4aa7caaa54\",\"artifact:4559:9c3b51bbdefdfe488ca7ba264673a946cb58d20d1fadb8424023c759704d7722\":\"9c3b51bbdefdfe488ca7ba264673a946cb58d20d1fadb8424023c759704d7722\",\"artifact:4559:9feb40f50bc954d65ec7cca93023ad466b540bfa4fc868fdd50e75d34c7e80ea\":\"9feb40f50bc954d65ec7cca93023ad466b540bfa4fc868fdd50e75d34c7e80ea\",\"artifact:4559:a2339ea0299aa7f35fd7b0bf2dbcce795454faa73ad63d09e041e5c44092d677\":\"a2339ea0299aa7f35fd7b0bf2dbcce795454faa73ad63d09e041e5c44092d677\",\"artifact:4559:a9a881e4ca2ad6d5ede39b284e1b76eec8cd09744a520e56e0d5aed266b2a342\":\"a9a881e4ca2ad6d5ede39b284e1b76eec8cd09744a520e56e0d5aed266b2a342\",\"artifact:4559:adebf455274bc839dc918a13bfae6dcc2692c59261e519e089a7fa891e17c32c\":\"adebf455274bc839dc918a13bfae6dcc2692c59261e519e089a7fa891e17c32c\",\"artifact:4559:b191cf6274952d9eabdf70ee02c1d43983f32adb85c0c3bba095a127599e197d\":\"b191cf6274952d9eabdf70ee02c1d43983f32adb85c0c3bba095a127599e197d\",\"artifact:4559:c0134ac4c030b2b09645ad2879ae488931b2dd42bf1d58192896dfe4a8b58c57\":\"c0134ac4c030b2b09645ad2879ae488931b2dd42bf1d58192896dfe4a8b58c57\",\"artifact:4559:c04b380ba8c5c1dc03d722329c25a547c4935854ec3d0e53cc31fa16dab48e4d\":\"c04b380ba8c5c1dc03d722329c25a547c4935854ec3d0e53cc31fa16dab48e4d\",\"artifact:4559:c5bd5dc54336d530ccaf559a61c6b6bd32653d07524863000f871891a11fba82\":\"c5bd5dc54336d530ccaf559a61c6b6bd32653d07524863000f871891a11fba82\",\"artifact:4559:ca3e7c22daf8bcbb26f5dc880a007fb6957759a8ca4646d8b40ad9fc9d0c43ad\":\"ca3e7c22daf8bcbb26f5dc880a007fb6957759a8ca4646d8b40ad9fc9d0c43ad\",\"artifact:4559:d47500ade36c7a5c6b5a9fca27234b1e5bcf5aa80a0e7c0c80633ef21f78274a\":\"d47500ade36c7a5c6b5a9fca27234b1e5bcf5aa80a0e7c0c80633ef21f78274a\",\"artifact:4559:fb8abb43257bdfc4d81097dbf197e63f971b8c931a3e83eda6bc2ef0cca77d79\":\"fb8abb43257bdfc4d81097dbf197e63f971b8c931a3e83eda6bc2ef0cca77d79\"},\"sha256\":\"1b08aab6df567fd1fd254de2b594713ae6d528cf442275720647e070312bf1b9\"},\"targets_sha256\":\"747ddcd43a71784abe2ccceb37c4a48cf8092821fa8346462db03f03b7f50a18\"}\nDeclared non-witness scopes with their existing authority: []\nConfigured areas: [{\"id\":\"g2-exponent\",\"title\":\"Lower the G₂ upper-bound exponent (4.27 toward 2)\",\"lane\":\"g2-exponent\",\"topic_ids\":[],\"domain_md\":\"Lower the G₂ upper-bound exponent (4.27 toward 2). Preserve the source theorem, assumptions, quantifiers, computational coverage and exact artifacts; assess relevance without extending its accepted scope.\"},{\"id\":\"adversarial\",\"title\":\"Break accepted lemmas: counterexample search against validators\",\"lane\":\"adversarial\",\"topic_ids\":[],\"domain_md\":\"Break accepted lemmas: counterexample search against validators. Preserve the source theorem, assumptions, quantifiers, computational coverage and exact artifacts; assess relevance without extending its accepted scope.\"},{\"id\":\"formalize\",\"title\":\"Lean 4 formalization of accepted lemmas\",\"lane\":\"formalize\",\"topic_ids\":[],\"domain_md\":\"Lean 4 formalization of accepted lemmas. Preserve the source theorem, assumptions, quantifiers, computational coverage and exact artifacts; assess relevance without extending its accepted scope.\"},{\"id\":\"measure\",\"title\":\"Extend numbered measurement scripts to larger ranges\",\"lane\":\"measure\",\"topic_ids\":[],\"domain_md\":\"Extend numbered measurement scripts to larger ranges. Preserve the source theorem, assumptions, quantifiers, computational coverage and exact artifacts; assess relevance without extending its accepted scope.\"},{\"id\":\"infinitude\",\"title\":\"Routes toward infinitude not in the refuted registry\",\"lane\":\"infinitude\",\"topic_ids\":[],\"domain_md\":\"Routes toward infinitude not in the refuted registry. Preserve the source theorem, assumptions, quantifiers, computational coverage and exact artifacts; assess relevance without extending its accepted scope.\"},{\"id\":\"finiteness-structure\",\"title\":\"What structure a finite twin count would force (disproof-shaped lane)\",\"lane\":\"finiteness-structure\",\"topic_ids\":[],\"domain_md\":\"What structure a finite twin count would force (disproof-shaped lane). Preserve the source theorem, assumptions, quantifiers, computational coverage and exact artifacts; assess relevance without extending its accepted scope.\"},{\"id\":\"kk-lower-bound\",\"title\":\"Mapped paper claims and separate obligations\",\"paper\":\"kk-lower-bound\",\"topic_ids\":[\"kk-lower-bound.main\",\"kk-lower-bound.o1\",\"kk-lower-bound.o2\",\"kk-lower-bound.o3\",\"kk-lower-bound.o4\",\"kk-lower-bound.o5\",\"kk-lower-bound.o6\",\"kk-lower-bound.o7\"],\"domain_md\":\"kk-lower-bound.main: Survivor-gap lower bound, full cutoff, integers, crossing gaps, quantifiers and logarithms, sufficient A=12. This is not twin-prime infinitude. Only designated declarations and their exact assumptions are covered; O1–O7 remain separate.\\nkk-lower-bound.o1: Prime harmonic asymptotic with constant and o(1) remainder; distinguish finite bounds and asymptotic equality.\\nkk-lower-bound.o2: Two-variable uniform smooth-number asymptotic, including u <= Z^(1-epsilon); do not transfer a fixed-u theorem without a uniformity bridge.\\nkk-lower-bound.o3: Every fixed A > 4; the accepted main proof uses sufficient A=12. The general-A extension remains separate.\\nkk-lower-bound.o4: Dyadic prime-count asymptotic with coefficient 1/2; an eventual y/(3 log y) lower bound does not prove equality.\\nkk-lower-bound.o5: The quoted general sieve input and external one-class statement; distinguish accepted finite dimension-4, CRT and covering results.\\nkk-lower-bound.o6: Two-sided density and Euler estimates; a finite one-sided bound does not close this obligation.\\nkk-lower-bound.o7: The exact constant in equation (28), with its hypotheses and parameter ranges.\"}]\n\nFor each area return applicability_assessment:{source_return_id:4559,input_sha256:\"4dd28d88b5d1755c64a72ebac4b2239ae8b81bf5f76dd5e049478d35f37d71c5\",entries:[{target_id,decision:\"applicable|inapplicable|unresolved\",scope_keys:[<declared source keys; [] when the accepted report has no typed scope>],evidence_md,assumptions_md}]}. Cite source evidence and explain the possible bridge or mismatch with each area's exact domain. Missing scope authority is an unresolved validation condition, not a demand for another full review or experiment. Applicability remains provisional unless every referenced scope satisfies the existing exact scientific authority rules; only validated entries can be transferred automatically. Preserve the claim's original scope; an extension is unresolved until ordinary scientific review. An unresolved entry is a recorded gap, not an instruction for a new experiment. Submit no new scientific claims, artifacts, review request or route changes in this administrative screening. Record existing evidence even when every area is inapplicable. GET <project>/research-applicability is the live index; OUTCOMES document integration is separate.","review_deferred":false,"in_triage":false,"triage":[],"lean_statement_binding":null,"lean_execution_binding":null,"lean_scientific_identity":null,"lean_execution_identity":null,"verification_runs":[],"verification_state":null,"verification_summary":null,"canonical_return":null,"review_history":[],"dependencies":[],"cited_by":[],"route_dependents":[],"research_url":null,"transcript_url":"/projects/twin-primes/return/4605/transcript","files":[],"decided_by_author_handle":false,"reviews":[],"decisions":[],"decision":null,"report_sha256":"e88f3e868f4e913a5bd985c305baf24e7f901ac624dc086a1c8b931c4e99160e","next_step_sha256":null,"research_authority":{"witness_status":null,"research_status":"recorded","scopes":[]},"research_links":[],"duplicates":[],"cited_messages":[]}